Las Vegas Raiders vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats

The las vegas raiders vs washington commanders match player stats from the September 21, 2025 NFL Week 3 matchup tell a much more detailed story than the final score alone. The Washington Commanders defeated the Las Vegas Raiders 41-24, improving to 2-1 while Las Vegas fell to 1-2. Washington’s 201 rushing yards, five sacks, strong return game, and balanced offensive production helped create separation, while the Raiders produced 289 passing yards and three touchdown receptions but struggled to establish a consistent rushing attack.

The game was played in Washington, where the Commanders improved to 2-0 at home at that point in the season. Las Vegas entered the matchup 1-1 on the road. The final score suggested a comfortable Washington victory, but the individual numbers reveal several different battles within the game. Geno Smith produced an efficient passing performance for the Raiders, Tre Tucker delivered a spectacular receiving display, and Maxx Crosby remained a major defensive presence. For Washington, Marcus Mariota protected the football, the rushing attack produced 201 yards, and Bobby Wagner led a defense that consistently pressured the quarterback.

For readers examining las vegas raiders vs washington commanders match player stats, the most useful approach is to look beyond the headline numbers and compare passing, rushing, receiving, defensive pressure, special teams, and efficiency.

Game Overview

The Commanders won 41-24 on September 21, 2025, in Week 3 of the NFL regular season. Washington entered the game at 1-1 and moved to 2-1 after the victory. Las Vegas entered at 1-1 and dropped to 1-2.

The ESPN schedule and box-score record lists Washington as the 41-24 winner in the Week 3 matchup. ESPN game and schedule data

Final Score

Team	Final Score	Record After Game
Washington Commanders	41	2-1
Las Vegas Raiders	24	1-2

The 17-point margin was built through several phases rather than one overwhelming statistical advantage. Washington rushed for 201 yards compared with 93 for Las Vegas, while the Commanders recorded five sacks against one by the Raiders.

That combination is important because it shows how Washington controlled the physical side of the contest even though Las Vegas generated plenty of passing production.

Las Vegas Raiders vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats: Passing

The quarterback numbers provide one of the most interesting contrasts from the game.

Geno Smith completed 19 of 29 passes for 289 yards, averaging 10.0 yards per attempt. He threw three touchdown passes and did not throw an interception. His reported passer rating was 132.7, with a QBR of 69.0.

Marcus Mariota completed 15 of 21 passes for 207 yards. He averaged 9.9 yards per attempt and threw one touchdown without an interception. His passer rating was 118.6, with a 55.9 QBR.

Geno Smith’s Passing Performance

Smith’s 289 passing yards represented the largest passing total of the game. He also produced three touchdown passes without an interception.

His basic passing line was:

• Completions: 19
• Attempts: 29
• Completion percentage: 65.5%
• Passing yards: 289
• Yards per attempt: 10.0
• Touchdowns: 3
• Interceptions: 0
• Sacks: 5
• Sack yardage: 28
• Passer rating: 132.7
• QBR: 69.0

The most notable part of this performance is that the Raiders quarterback was productive despite Washington generating five sacks. A quarterback can post strong passing numbers while still facing significant pressure, and this game is a good example.

Smith also benefited from a major performance by Tre Tucker, whose 145 receiving yards accounted for half of the Raiders’ total receiving yardage.

Marcus Mariota’s Passing Performance

Mariota had fewer attempts and fewer total passing yards, but Washington did not need him to throw 30 or 40 times.

His numbers were:

• Completions: 15
• Attempts: 21
• Passing yards: 207
• Yards per attempt: 9.9
• Touchdowns: 1
• Interceptions: 0
• Sacks: 1
• Sack yardage: 8
• Passer rating: 118.6
• QBR: 55.9

The efficiency is especially notable. Mariota averaged almost exactly the same yards per attempt as Smith while throwing eight fewer passes.

The difference was that Washington complemented the passing game with an extremely productive rushing attack. That allowed the Commanders to remain balanced and avoid making the quarterback responsible for carrying the entire offense.

Rushing Comparison

The rushing numbers provide one of the clearest explanations for Washington’s victory.

The Commanders finished with 201 rushing yards on 32 attempts, an average of 6.3 yards per carry. They scored three rushing touchdowns and produced a longest run of 60 yards.

Las Vegas managed 93 rushing yards on 28 attempts, averaging only 3.3 yards per carry and producing no rushing touchdowns.

That created a 108-yard advantage for Washington on the ground.

Las Vegas Rushing Leaders

Ashton Jeanty led the Raiders with 17 carries for 63 yards. He averaged 3.7 yards per carry and recorded a longest run of 18 yards.

Zamir White added 19 yards on five carries, averaging 3.8 yards per attempt.

Geno Smith rushed twice for five yards, while Tre Tucker recorded one carry for four yards. Dylan Laube had three carries for two yards.

The Raiders’ complete team rushing line was:

• 28 carries
• 93 yards
• 3.3 yards per carry
• 0 rushing touchdowns
• 18-yard longest run

Jeanty’s workload stands out because he handled 17 of the team’s 28 rushing attempts. However, Washington’s defensive performance limited the efficiency of those opportunities.

Washington Rushing Leaders

Washington produced contributions from several players.

Jeremy McNichols was particularly efficient, rushing four times for 78 yards and one touchdown. His 60-yard run dramatically lifted his average to 19.5 yards per carry.

Marcus Mariota added 40 yards on six carries and scored one rushing touchdown.

Chris Rodriguez Jr. carried 11 times for 39 yards, while Jacory Croskey-Merritt had eight carries for 26 yards and one touchdown. Deebo Samuel Sr. added 18 yards on three attempts.

Washington’s team rushing line was:

• 32 carries
• 201 yards
• 6.3 yards per carry
• 3 rushing touchdowns
• 60-yard longest run

The difference between 3.3 and 6.3 yards per carry is substantial. Washington was not simply running more often. The Commanders were gaining significantly more yardage each time they ran the ball.

Receiving Statistics

The receiving statistics reveal a major reason the Raiders were able to score 24 points despite the rushing disadvantage.

Las Vegas recorded 19 receptions for 289 yards and three touchdowns. Washington recorded 15 receptions for 207 yards and one touchdown.

Interestingly, each team’s passing yardage and receiving yardage matched the quarterback’s official passing total in the supplied data.

Tre Tucker Leads the Raiders

Tre Tucker was the standout receiver for Las Vegas.

He finished with:

• 8 receptions
• 145 yards
• 18.1 yards per reception
• 3 touchdowns
• 61-yard longest reception
• 9 targets

Tucker’s three touchdown receptions accounted for all of Las Vegas’ passing touchdowns.

His 145 yards represented exactly half of the Raiders’ 289 receiving yards. That makes his contribution particularly significant.

A 61-yard reception also demonstrated the explosive element of his performance. Rather than accumulating his yardage through a large number of short receptions, Tucker consistently generated substantial gains.

Other Las Vegas Receivers

Jakobi Meyers recorded three receptions for 63 yards on four targets. His average of 21.0 yards per reception was also impressive.

Brock Bowers caught four passes for 38 yards on five targets. His longest reception was 18 yards.

Dont’e Thornton Jr. added two receptions for 29 yards on four targets.

The distribution was therefore concentrated around a small group of players, with Tucker accounting for the largest share of production.

Washington Receiving Leaders

Terry McLaurin led Washington in receiving yards with three receptions for 74 yards. He averaged 24.7 yards per reception and recorded a 56-yard reception.

Luke McCaffrey caught three passes for 56 yards and one touchdown. His 18.7-yard average showed that Washington was able to create explosive plays without relying heavily on passing volume.

Zach Ertz added three receptions for 38 yards, while Chris Moore caught two passes for 25 yards.

Washington’s receiving line was:

• 15 receptions
• 207 yards
• 13.8 yards per reception
• 1 touchdown
• 56-yard longest reception
• 18 targets

The Commanders therefore did not need a high-volume passing attack. Their 15 completions were supported by an efficient running game that produced three rushing touchdowns.

Defensive Player Stats

Defense was another major separator.

Washington recorded five sacks, eight tackles for loss, four passes defended, nine quarterback hits, and one defensive touchdown.

Las Vegas recorded one sack, six tackles for loss, two passes defended, and three quarterback hits.

The overall defensive totals were:

Defensive Category	Las Vegas	Washington
Total tackles	65	69
Solo tackles	41	43
Sacks	1	5
Tackles for loss	6	8
Pass defenses	2	4
QB hits	3	9
Defensive touchdowns	0	1
Interceptions	0	0

The absence of interceptions is also worth noting. Neither defense intercepted a pass, so Washington’s advantage came primarily through pressure, tackles behind the line, and the defensive touchdown recorded in the game data.

Maxx Crosby’s Impact

Maxx Crosby led the Raiders defense with seven total tackles, including four solo tackles. He also recorded one sack and two tackles for loss.

Crosby’s statistics demonstrate that he remained active even while Washington’s offense generated 41 points.

His one sack represented all of Las Vegas’ recorded sacks in the game.

Bobby Wagner’s Defensive Performance

Bobby Wagner led Washington with 11 total tackles, six solo tackles, two sacks, two tackles for loss, and three quarterback hits.

His numbers demonstrate involvement in both run defense and quarterback pressure.

The three quarterback hits are especially relevant when analyzing the broader defensive performance. Washington did not rely exclusively on sacks. The Commanders repeatedly disrupted the quarterback and forced the Raiders to operate under pressure.

Why Washington’s Pass Rush Mattered

The five-to-one sack advantage is one of the clearest statistical differences between the teams.

Las Vegas produced 289 passing yards, so Washington did not completely shut down the Raiders’ aerial attack. Instead, the Commanders created pressure at important moments while also limiting the effectiveness of the running game.

Washington’s nine quarterback hits compared with three from Las Vegas provide another useful measurement.

This distinction matters because sacks are only one form of pressure. A quarterback can be affected by hits, hurried throws, collapsing pockets, and reduced time to read the defense even when the play does not officially become a sack.

In this game, Washington recorded nine quarterback hits and five sacks, indicating a sustained ability to challenge the Raiders’ passing operation.

Special Teams Player Stats

Special teams also contributed several notable plays.

Kick Returns

Las Vegas received strong return production from Dylan Laube, who had three kick returns for 60 yards, averaging 20.0 yards per return.

Zamir White added one return for 27 yards, while Tre Tucker had one for 23 yards.

Washington received an even bigger boost from Deebo Samuel Sr., who returned two kicks for 93 yards at an average of 46.5 yards per return. His longest return was 69 yards.

Luke McCaffrey added one 25-yard kick return.

Punt Returns

Jaylin Lane was a major special teams contributor for Washington.

He recorded five punt returns for 127 yards, averaging 25.4 yards per return. His longest return went for 90 yards, and the supplied statistics credit him with a punt return touchdown.

Tre Tucker handled two punt returns for Las Vegas, gaining 10 yards.

The difference in punt return production created another field-position advantage for Washington.

Kicking

Daniel Carlson was perfect on his lone field-goal attempt, making a 37-yard kick. He also converted his extra-point attempt for four total points.

Matt Gay made two of three field-goal attempts, with a 56-yard long, and converted all five extra-point attempts. He finished with 11 points.

Punting

AJ Cole punted six times for Las Vegas for 294 yards, averaging 49.0 yards per punt. His longest punt traveled 56 yards.

Tress Way punted three times for Washington for 138 yards, averaging 46.0 yards. Two of his punts finished inside the 20-yard line.

The punting numbers were relatively close in average distance, but Washington’s two punts inside the 20 provided useful field-position value.

The Most Important Statistical Differences

When evaluating the las vegas raiders vs washington commanders match player stats, several categories immediately stand out.

1. Rushing Yardage

Washington gained 201 rushing yards compared with 93 for Las Vegas.

That is a 108-yard advantage.

The Commanders also averaged 6.3 yards per carry, almost twice the Raiders’ 3.3 average.

2. Rushing Touchdowns

Washington scored three rushing touchdowns.

Las Vegas scored none.

That difference gave Washington a major advantage in converting its ground production into points.

3. Defensive Pressure

Washington recorded five sacks and nine quarterback hits.

Las Vegas recorded one sack and three quarterback hits.

The Commanders consistently generated more disruption.

4. Explosive Returns

Jaylin Lane’s 90-yard punt return and Deebo Samuel Sr.’s 69-yard kick return gave Washington major special teams production.

5. Passing Efficiency

Both quarterbacks were efficient by traditional passing metrics.

Smith posted a 132.7 passer rating.

Mariota posted a 118.6 passer rating.

Neither quarterback threw an interception.

This means the final result cannot be explained simply by quarterback mistakes.

How the Game Could Be Understood Through Efficiency

A useful way to interpret this matchup is to separate volume from efficiency.

Las Vegas actually produced more passing yards than Washington. Smith threw for 289 yards, while Mariota threw for 207.

But Washington produced 201 rushing yards, while Las Vegas managed only 93.

When the two offensive categories are combined, both teams finished with 300 yards of offensive yardage from the supplied passing and rushing totals:

Las Vegas: 289 passing + 93 rushing = 382 yards.

Washington: 207 passing + 201 rushing = 408 yards.

This creates an important distinction.

Washington did not simply win because Las Vegas could not move the ball. The Raiders generated 382 combined passing and rushing yards. Instead, Washington created more efficient rushing production, scored more rushing touchdowns, generated substantially more defensive pressure, and added a major special teams advantage.

That is why the box score is more informative than looking only at passing totals.

A Closer Look at Explosive Plays

Explosive plays changed the statistical shape of the game.

Las Vegas had several significant receiving gains. Tucker’s longest catch was 61 yards, while Meyers recorded a 45-yard reception.

Washington had a 56-yard reception from McLaurin and a 60-yard rushing play from McNichols.

Special teams added even larger explosive plays, particularly for Washington.

Jaylin Lane’s 90-yard punt return was the longest return listed in the supplied statistics. Deebo Samuel Sr. also produced a 69-yard kick return.

These plays matter because a long gain can dramatically change field position and reduce the number of plays an offense needs to score.

What the Numbers Say About Each Offense

The Raiders’ offensive identity in this game was heavily influenced by the passing game.

Smith threw three touchdown passes, and Tucker caught all three. The Raiders averaged 10.0 yards per pass attempt and produced 289 passing yards.

The problem was that the rushing game did not provide the same efficiency.

Washington’s offense was more balanced. Mariota threw for 207 yards and one touchdown, while the rushing unit produced 201 yards and three touchdowns.

That balance meant the Commanders could score through multiple methods.

The result was a Washington offense that did not need an enormous passing total to reach 41 points.

What the Numbers Say About Each Defense

Washington’s defense produced the stronger pressure statistics.

Five sacks, nine quarterback hits, and eight tackles for loss created repeated negative plays.

Las Vegas’ defense was led by Crosby, but the team produced only one sack and three quarterback hits.

Neither defense recorded an interception, which means Washington’s defensive advantage was primarily generated through pressure and disruption rather than takeaway volume.

The one defensive touchdown credited to Washington added another major scoring component.

Player-by-Player Statistical Snapshot

Las Vegas Raiders

Geno Smith

• 19 completions on 29 attempts
• 289 passing yards
• 3 passing touchdowns
• 0 interceptions
• 5 sacks
• 132.7 passer rating

Ashton Jeanty

• 17 rushing attempts
• 63 rushing yards
• 3.7 yards per carry
• 18-yard longest run

Tre Tucker

• 8 receptions
• 145 receiving yards
• 3 touchdowns
• 18.1 yards per reception
• 61-yard longest reception

Jakobi Meyers

• 3 receptions
• 63 yards
• 21.0 yards per reception
• 45-yard longest reception

Brock Bowers

• 4 receptions
• 38 yards
• 5 targets

Maxx Crosby

• 7 total tackles
• 4 solo tackles
• 1 sack
• 2 tackles for loss

Washington Commanders

Marcus Mariota

• 15 completions on 21 attempts
• 207 passing yards
• 1 passing touchdown
• 0 interceptions
• 1 sack
• 118.6 passer rating
• 40 rushing yards
• 1 rushing touchdown

Jeremy McNichols

• 4 rushing attempts
• 78 yards
• 19.5 yards per carry
• 1 touchdown
• 60-yard longest run

Terry McLaurin

• 3 receptions
• 74 yards
• 24.7 yards per reception
• 56-yard longest reception

Luke McCaffrey

• 3 receptions
• 56 yards
• 1 touchdown

Bobby Wagner

• 11 total tackles
• 6 solo tackles
• 2 sacks
• 2 tackles for loss
• 3 quarterback hits

Jaylin Lane

• 5 punt returns
• 127 return yards
• 25.4 yards per return
• 90-yard longest return
• 1 punt return touchdown

What Makes These Player Stats Useful?

Box-score statistics are useful because they allow readers to separate individual contribution from team results.

For example, the Raiders lost by 17 points, but Smith’s 289 passing yards and three touchdowns show that his individual passing production was strong.

Likewise, Washington’s 41 points cannot be attributed to Mariota’s passing numbers alone. The rushing game, defense, and return game all made significant contributions.

This is one reason a detailed player-stat analysis is more useful than simply listing the final score.

It helps explain how the result developed.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between the Raiders and Commanders?

The Washington Commanders defeated the Las Vegas Raiders 41-24 on September 21, 2025, during NFL Week 3.

Who was the Raiders’ leading passer?

Geno Smith led Las Vegas with 19 completions on 29 attempts for 289 yards, three touchdowns, and no interceptions.

Who led the Raiders in receiving?

Tre Tucker led Las Vegas with eight receptions for 145 yards and three touchdowns. His longest reception was 61 yards.

Who led Washington in rushing?

Jeremy McNichols led Washington with 78 rushing yards on four carries. He averaged 19.5 yards per carry and scored one rushing touchdown.

Who had the most tackles in the game?

Bobby Wagner led Washington with 11 total tackles. He also recorded two sacks, two tackles for loss, and three quarterback hits.

Which team had more rushing yards?

Washington had 201 rushing yards, while Las Vegas had 93. The Commanders therefore held a 108-yard advantage on the ground.

Conclusion

The las vegas raiders vs washington commanders match player stats show a game in which the final score was supported by several distinct statistical advantages for Washington.

The Raiders produced 289 passing yards, three passing touchdowns, and a standout 145-yard receiving performance from Tre Tucker. Geno Smith also completed 19 of 29 passes without an interception and finished with a 132.7 passer rating.

Washington answered with a much stronger rushing attack. The Commanders gained 201 yards on 32 carries, averaged 6.3 yards per attempt, and scored three rushing touchdowns. Jeremy McNichols’ 78-yard performance was particularly explosive, while Marcus Mariota contributed both through the air and on the ground.

The defensive numbers further separated the teams. Washington recorded five sacks and nine quarterback hits, compared with one sack and three quarterback hits from Las Vegas. Bobby Wagner was a central figure in that performance with 11 tackles and two sacks.

Special teams also played an important role. Jaylin Lane produced 127 punt-return yards, including a 90-yard touchdown return, while Deebo Samuel Sr. added 93 kick-return yards.

Overall, the statistics show that Washington’s 41-24 victory was built on rushing efficiency, defensive pressure, explosive special teams plays, and enough passing production to keep the offense balanced. Las Vegas generated meaningful offensive production, especially through Smith and Tucker, but its lower rushing efficiency and smaller defensive pressure total made it difficult to match Washington’s overall production.

For the full statistical record and official game information, the ESPN reference provides the relevant record for this Week 3 matchup.