Portland Trail Blazers vs Houston Rockets Match Player Stats

The portland trail blazers vs houston rockets match player stats from January 10, 2026, tell a much more detailed story than the final score alone. Portland defeated Houston 111-105 at Moda Center in a game that changed direction several times, with the Rockets controlling much of the third quarter before the Trail Blazers produced a decisive fourth-quarter response. Toumani Camara led Portland with 25 points, while Deni Avdija and Shaedon Sharpe each scored 20. For Houston, Kevin Durant finished with 30 points, Amen Thompson added 24, and Dorian Finney-Smith contributed 20.

The result was particularly notable because Houston entered the game with a 22-13 record, including an 11-11 mark on the road, while Portland was 19-20 overall and 10-9 at home. The matchup also formed part of a tightly contested season series between the two teams. Portland had already won the November meeting 140-116, Houston answered with a 103-102 victory on January 8, and Portland took the January 10 meeting 111-105. The later March meeting was won by Houston 106-99, leaving Portland with a 2-1 season-series lead at the point covered by the supplied game data.

This article breaks down the numbers behind the result, explains which players made the biggest statistical impact, and looks at why Portland was able to overcome Houston’s strong third quarter.

Portland Trail Blazers vs Houston Rockets Match Player Stats

The January 10 matchup was decided by a combination of late-game execution, shooting efficiency from the free-throw line, and Portland’s fourth-quarter scoring surge.

CategoryHouston RocketsPortland Trail Blazers
Final Score	105	111
Field Goals	40-96	37-89
Field Goal Percentage	42%	42%
3-Pointers	10-44	16-44
3-Point Percentage	23%	36%
Free Throws	15-24	21-23
Free-Throw Percentage	63%	91%
Rebounds	56	43
Assists	21	26
Turnovers	13	13
Steals	8	9
Blocks	8	3

At first glance, Houston’s 56 rebounds stand out. The Rockets controlled the glass by a considerable margin, yet Portland still won the game. That is one of the most useful lessons from this matchup: winning a major statistical category does not necessarily translate into winning the game when another team is significantly more efficient in other areas.

Portland made 16 of its 44 three-point attempts compared with Houston’s 10 of 44. The Trail Blazers also converted 21 of 23 free throws, while Houston made only 15 of 24.

Those differences were enough to offset Houston’s rebounding advantage.

How the Game Developed Quarter by Quarter

The final score hides how different the four quarters were.

QuarterHoustonPortland
First	29	28
Second	27	27
Third	34	22
Fourth	15	34
Final	105	111

Houston had the better third quarter by a wide margin, scoring 34 points while limiting Portland to 22. That gave the Rockets a strong position entering the final period.

Portland, however, completely reversed the momentum in the fourth quarter.

The Trail Blazers scored 34 points in the final period while Houston managed only 15. That 19-point swing in the fourth quarter was the central statistical reason Portland finished with the six-point victory.

First Half: A Closely Balanced Contest

The first two quarters were almost perfectly even.

Houston scored 29 points in the opening period compared with Portland’s 28. Both teams then scored 27 points in the second quarter.

That left Houston ahead 56-55 at halftime.

There was no major separation during the opening half. Both teams were able to create scoring opportunities, and neither side managed to establish sustained control.

For Houston, Durant was already providing the primary scoring threat. Portland received important production from Camara and its supporting group.

The first half established a pattern that continued throughout the game: Houston had enough offensive firepower to stay close, but Portland had multiple players capable of contributing.

Third Quarter: Houston Creates Separation

The third quarter was Houston’s strongest period.

The Rockets scored 34 points, their highest total of the four quarters, while Portland scored only 22. Houston therefore entered the fourth quarter with an 86-77 advantage.

That nine-point margin was significant, especially because Houston had already shown that it could generate efficient scoring stretches.

Durant remained central to Houston’s attack, while Amen Thompson continued to provide scoring pressure.

The third quarter also demonstrated why simply looking at the final score can be misleading. Houston had a clear advantage heading into the final 12 minutes, and Portland needed a major adjustment to change the outcome.

Fourth Quarter: Portland Takes Control

The fourth quarter was where the game changed.

Portland scored 34 points, matching its entire first-quarter total and producing 12 more points than it had scored in the third.

Houston, meanwhile, dropped from 34 points in the third quarter to only 15 in the fourth.

That 34-15 quarter allowed Portland to erase the nine-point deficit and finish six points ahead.

The difference was not simply about one player scoring repeatedly. Portland’s offense produced contributions from several players, and its free-throw shooting remained extremely reliable.

The Trail Blazers ultimately finished the game at 91% from the free-throw line, making 21 of 23 attempts.

Kevin Durant Leads Houston’s Scoring

Kevin Durant was Houston’s leading scorer with 30 points.

His scoring output was the highest individual total in the game, and he was the main offensive reference point for the Rockets.

Durant’s 30 points were followed by Amen Thompson’s 24 and Dorian Finney-Smith’s 20.

Together, those three players accounted for 74 of Houston’s 105 points.

That means approximately 70% of Houston’s total scoring came from those three players.

The concentration of scoring shows both the strength and limitation of Houston’s offensive production in this game. The Rockets had three players producing at a high level, but the team ultimately needed more scoring efficiency during the fourth quarter.

Durant also finished with 12 rebounds according to the official game box score, giving him a double-double while maintaining his role as Houston’s primary scorer.

Amen Thompson Adds 24 Points

Amen Thompson finished with 24 points, making him Houston’s second-highest scorer.

His contribution was important because he provided another major scoring option alongside Durant.

Thompson also recorded nine rebounds, placing him just one rebound short of a double-double.

The combination of 24 points and nine rebounds illustrates how Thompson contributed beyond pure scoring. His ability to create an impact around the basket and on the boards helped Houston maintain its advantage through portions of the game.

However, the fourth-quarter scoring decline ultimately prevented Houston from converting that production into a victory.

Dorian Finney-Smith Scores 20

Dorian Finney-Smith was Houston’s third-highest scorer with 20 points.

His 20-point contribution gave the Rockets another player capable of reaching a substantial scoring total.

With Durant at 30, Thompson at 24, and Finney-Smith at 20, Houston had three 20-point contributors.

Despite that, the Rockets finished with 105 points because the team’s offensive output fell sharply in the final quarter.

This is an important distinction when evaluating individual performance. A player can produce an impressive scoring night while the team still struggles to maintain offensive efficiency for all four quarters.

Toumani Camara Leads Portland With 25 Points

Toumani Camara was Portland’s leading scorer with 25 points.

His scoring total was five points higher than the next two Portland scorers, Deni Avdija and Shaedon Sharpe, who each finished with 20.

Camara’s 25-point performance was particularly valuable because Portland needed contributions from multiple players rather than relying on one dominant scorer.

The distribution was much more balanced than Houston’s top-heavy scoring pattern.

Portland had three players score at least 20 points:

• Toumani Camara: 25 points
• Deni Avdija: 20 points
• Shaedon Sharpe: 20 points

That gave Portland 65 points from its three leading scorers.

The balance between those three players helped Portland remain competitive even when Houston controlled the third quarter.

Deni Avdija Provides Important Scoring

Deni Avdija finished with 20 points and played an important role in Portland’s late comeback.

The game situation made his scoring particularly meaningful because Portland needed consistent offense during the fourth quarter.

Avdija’s contribution was not simply about reaching the 20-point mark. His scoring helped Portland maintain pressure when Houston was trying to protect its lead.

The Trail Blazers needed several players to contribute during the final period, and Avdija was one of the players who helped make that comeback possible.

Shaedon Sharpe Adds Another 20-Point Performance

Shaedon Sharpe also finished with 20 points.

His scoring gave Portland a third player at the 20-point level, making the Trail Blazers’ offensive production more evenly distributed.

This balance is important when studying the game statistically.

Houston’s top three scorers combined for 74 points. Portland’s top three combined for 65. Houston therefore received more scoring from its top three players, but Portland’s overall shooting efficiency and fourth-quarter performance helped compensate.

The game is a strong example of why player statistics should be examined together with team-level numbers.

Donovan Clingan Controls the Rebounding Battle

Donovan Clingan was one of Portland’s most important contributors despite not leading the team in scoring.

He finished as Portland’s leading rebounder with 15 boards and also led the team in assists with six.

That combination is notable for a center.

Clingan’s 15 rebounds helped Portland compete despite Houston’s overall 56-43 advantage on the glass.

The Rockets collected 13 more rebounds than Portland as a team, so Clingan’s individual work was particularly valuable.

A strong rebounding performance can prevent additional possessions, create second chances, and reduce the impact of an opponent’s size advantage.

In this matchup, Portland did not win the overall rebounding category, but Clingan’s work helped keep the deficit from becoming even more damaging.

Sidy Cissoko Makes an Impact Defensively

Sidy Cissoko led Portland with three steals.

Steals do not always appear in the headline statistics, but they can become especially valuable during a close game.

Portland finished with nine steals compared with Houston’s eight. The difference was small, but Cissoko’s three steals represented a significant portion of Portland’s defensive disruption.

The late stages of the game were especially important because Houston needed reliable possessions while attempting to protect or regain its lead.

Creating turnovers can change possession value quickly, particularly when a team is trying to complete a comeback.

Shooting Efficiency Explains a Major Part of the Result

One of the clearest differences between the teams came from outside shooting.

Both teams attempted 44 three-pointers.

Houston made 10.

Portland made 16.

That means Portland converted six more three-point attempts despite both teams taking the exact same number of attempts.

At the percentages level, Houston shot 23% from three-point range, while Portland shot 36%.

That difference created an important scoring advantage.

The Trail Blazers also finished with a much better free-throw percentage.

Portland converted 21 of 23 attempts for 91%.

Houston made 15 of 24 for 63%.

Portland therefore made six more free throws while also making six more three-pointers.

Those two differences created 24 additional made points from those scoring methods before considering the rest of the field-goal production.

That helps explain how Portland could win despite Houston’s superior rebounding numbers.

Both Teams Had the Same Field-Goal Percentage

An interesting aspect of the portland trail blazers vs houston rockets match player stats is that both teams finished with approximately the same overall field-goal percentage.

Houston made 40 of 96 field-goal attempts, or 42%.

Portland made 37 of 89, also approximately 42%.

This means the game was not decided by a major difference in overall field-goal accuracy.

Instead, the difference came from the types of shots each team converted and how effectively each team performed at the free-throw line.

Portland made fewer total field goals than Houston but scored more points.

That is a useful statistical reminder that field-goal percentage alone does not explain offensive efficiency.

Three-point shooting and free throws can dramatically change the scoring outcome even when overall field-goal percentages are similar.

Houston Wins the Rebounding Battle

Houston collected 56 rebounds compared with Portland’s 43.

That 13-rebound advantage was one of the strongest statistical areas for the Rockets.

The Rockets also recorded eight blocks, compared with Portland’s three.

These numbers show that Houston had a clear presence around the basket.

Steven Adams, Amen Thompson, Jabari Smith Jr., and Kevin Durant all contributed to Houston’s rebounding effort, while the team’s interior size helped produce the overall advantage.

However, the Rockets could not turn that rebounding edge into enough points during the final quarter.

This is a key takeaway from the matchup: possession advantages only become decisive when they are converted into efficient offense.

Portland Wins the Assist Battle

Portland recorded 26 assists compared with Houston’s 21.

The five-assist advantage suggests that Portland generated a slightly more connected offensive performance.

Assists do not capture every element of ball movement, but they can help show how effectively a team creates scoring opportunities for teammates.

Portland also had only 13 turnovers, exactly the same number as Houston.

That combination gave the Trail Blazers a favorable balance between ball movement and ball security.

Portland finished with more assists without committing fewer turnovers, which is a useful indicator of the team’s offensive organization in this particular game.

Turnovers Were Even

Both teams committed 13 turnovers.

That means neither side gained an advantage from simply taking better care of the ball.

The turnover numbers are especially interesting because Portland still won the game despite Houston producing more rebounds and blocks.

The Trail Blazers instead gained advantages in shooting, assists, steals, and free-throw efficiency.

This reinforces the importance of evaluating the complete statistical profile rather than identifying a single category as the reason for the result.

The Fourth Quarter Was the Defining Statistical Battle

If one quarter had to be identified as the most important, it would be the fourth.

Houston entered the period leading 86-77.

Portland then outscored Houston 34-15.

The Trail Blazers therefore won the final period by 19 points.

A nine-point deficit became a six-point victory.

That represents a 15-point swing in Portland’s favor relative to the pre-fourth-quarter margin.

The comeback required more than scoring. Portland needed to prevent Houston from maintaining its offensive rhythm.

Houston’s 15 fourth-quarter points were its lowest total of the game.

That combination of Portland’s 34 points and Houston’s 15 explains almost the entire final result.

Comparing the Three Leading Scorers on Each Team

A simple comparison of the top three scorers provides another useful perspective.

TeamPlayerPoints
Houston	Kevin Durant	30
Houston	Amen Thompson	24
Houston	Dorian Finney-Smith	20
Portland	Toumani Camara	25
Portland	Deni Avdija	20
Portland	Shaedon Sharpe	20

Houston’s top three produced 74 points.

Portland’s top three produced 65.

The Rockets therefore had the stronger scoring output from their three highest scorers.

Yet Portland scored 111 points to Houston’s 105.

That difference demonstrates the importance of contributions across the full rotation.

Portland did not need one player to match Durant’s 30-point total. Instead, it received a balanced scoring attack combined with better three-point and free-throw conversion.

Season Series Context

The January 10 meeting was the third game between these teams in the season series at that point.

The first meeting took place on November 15, when Portland won 140-116.

The second meeting came on January 8, when Houston won 103-102.

The third meeting was the January 10 contest, which Portland won 111-105.

That gave Portland a 2-1 advantage in the series at that stage.

The fourth meeting later took place on March 7, with Houston winning 106-99.

Across the four listed meetings, each team recorded two wins.

This sequence also shows how quickly the matchup changed.

The November game produced 256 combined points.

The January 8 game produced only 205.

The January 10 game produced 216.

The March 7 meeting produced 205.

That variation suggests that the matchup could produce very different statistical profiles depending on game context, shooting performance, and defensive execution.

What the Numbers Say About Portland’s Victory

The statistical profile of Portland’s win can be summarized through five major points.

First, the Trail Blazers shot the three-pointer more effectively. Both teams attempted 44 threes, but Portland made 16 while Houston made 10.

Second, Portland was much more accurate from the free-throw line. The Trail Blazers converted 91% of their attempts, while Houston converted 63%.

Third, Portland created more assists. Its 26 assists compared with Houston’s 21.

Fourth, Portland finished with one more steal and avoided giving away any turnover advantage. Both teams committed 13 turnovers.

Fifth, the fourth quarter completely changed the game. Portland scored 34 points while Houston scored only 15.

Houston still had meaningful statistical advantages.

The Rockets won the rebounding battle 56-43 and the blocks battle 8-3.

Those advantages, however, were not enough to overcome Portland’s shooting efficiency and late-game execution.

What the Numbers Say About Houston’s Performance

Houston’s statistics show that the Rockets were competitive for most of the game.

They had three players score at least 20 points, led by Durant’s 30.

The team also won the rebounding battle by 13 and recorded eight blocks.

Houston scored 34 points in the third quarter, its strongest offensive period.

The main problem was maintaining that production in the fourth.

The Rockets scored only 15 points during the final period.

That decline was particularly costly because Portland’s offense went in the opposite direction.

The Rockets therefore entered the fourth with a nine-point lead but finished the game six points behind.

Why Player Stats Need Context

Individual statistics are most useful when combined with team statistics and game flow.

For example, Durant’s 30 points were an excellent scoring total, but looking only at that number would not explain why Houston lost.

Similarly, Clingan’s 15 rebounds were impressive, but Portland still lost the overall rebounding battle.

The same applies to three-point shooting.

Portland’s 36% rate was clearly better than Houston’s 23%, but the significance becomes more obvious when we note that both teams attempted exactly 44 threes.

This type of context turns a basic box-score summary into a more meaningful statistical analysis.

Key Statistical Takeaways

The most important numbers from the game are:

1. Portland won 111-105.
2. Houston led 86-77 entering the fourth quarter.
3. Portland outscored Houston 34-15 in the fourth.
4. Kevin Durant led all scorers with 30 points.
5. Toumani Camara led Portland with 25 points.
6. Amen Thompson scored 24 points and grabbed nine rebounds.
7. Deni Avdija and Shaedon Sharpe each scored 20 points.
8. Dorian Finney-Smith scored 20 points for Houston.
9. Donovan Clingan collected 15 rebounds and six assists.
10. Portland made 16 of 44 three-pointers.
11. Houston made 10 of 44 three-pointers.
12. Portland shot 91% from the free-throw line.
13. Houston shot 63% from the free-throw line.
14. Houston won the rebounding battle 56-43.
15. Both teams committed 13 turnovers.
16. Portland finished with 26 assists compared with Houston’s 21.
17. Portland recorded nine steals compared with Houston’s eight.
18. Houston recorded eight blocks compared with Portland’s three.

Together, these numbers explain why the final score was not simply the result of one star player’s performance.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between Portland and Houston?

Portland defeated Houston 111-105 at Moda Center on January 10, 2026.

Who was the leading scorer in the game?

Kevin Durant led all scorers with 30 points for Houston. Toumani Camara was Portland’s leading scorer with 25 points.

Who led Portland in rebounds?

Donovan Clingan led Portland with 15 rebounds.

Who led Portland in assists?

Donovan Clingan also led Portland in assists with six.

How did Portland win despite having fewer rebounds?

Portland compensated with better three-point and free-throw shooting. The Trail Blazers made 16 of 44 three-pointers and 21 of 23 free throws, while Houston made 10 of 44 threes and 15 of 24 free throws.

What happened in the fourth quarter?

Portland outscored Houston 34-15 in the fourth quarter. Houston entered the period with an 86-77 lead but ultimately lost 111-105.

Conclusion

The portland trail blazers vs houston rockets match player stats show that the January 10, 2026 game was decided by efficiency and late-game execution rather than one statistical category.

Houston produced several strong numbers. The Rockets collected 56 rebounds, recorded eight blocks, and received 30 points from Kevin Durant, 24 from Amen Thompson, and 20 from Dorian Finney-Smith.

Portland answered with a more balanced scoring attack. Toumani Camara led the team with 25 points, while Deni Avdija and Shaedon Sharpe each scored 20. Donovan Clingan added 15 rebounds and six assists, giving Portland valuable production outside the scoring column.

The biggest difference came from shooting. Both teams attempted 44 three-pointers, but Portland made 16 compared with Houston’s 10. The Trail Blazers were also far more accurate at the free-throw line, converting 21 of 23 attempts.

Most importantly, Portland finished the game with a dramatic fourth-quarter advantage. After trailing 86-77, the Trail Blazers scored 34 points while holding Houston to 15.

The final 111-105 score therefore reflects a game in which Houston controlled important parts of the matchup, but Portland produced the more effective closing performance.