Utah Jazz vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats
The utah jazz vs dallas mavericks match player stats from their January 17, 2026 meeting tell a much more detailed story than the final score alone. Dallas defeated Utah 138-120 at American Airlines Center, controlling the game from the opening quarter and never allowing the Jazz to fully recover. Keyonte George led all scorers with 29 points, Brice Sensabaugh added 25, while Klay Thompson scored 23 points and helped Dallas establish its early advantage.
One date clarification is important for anyone publishing or archiving this game. The official NBA record identifies the matchup as Saturday, January 17, 2026. Some datasets may display January 18 depending on how the date is handled, but the NBA game page and official game information list January 17.
This was not simply a case of Dallas scoring more points. The Mavericks combined efficient three-point shooting, better ball movement, more transition production, and a much stronger opening quarter. Utah actually shot 53.9% from the field, but Dallas matched that overall efficiency while making 18 three-pointers compared with Utah’s 10. That difference became one of the clearest statistical separators.
Utah Jazz vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats
The most useful way to understand this game is to separate the basic box score from the factors that actually shaped the result.
| Category | Utah Jazz | Dallas Mavericks |
| Final Score | 120 | 138 |
| Field Goals | 48-89 | 49-91 |
| Field Goal % | 53.9% | 53.8% |
| 3-Pointers | 10-31 | 18-41 |
| 3-Point % | 32.3% | 43.9% |
| Free Throws | 14-20 | 22-36 |
| Rebounds | 41 | 44 |
| Assists | 30 | 36 |
| Turnovers | 15 | 11 |
| Steals | 5 | 8 |
| Blocks | 3 | 2 |
| Points in the Paint | 54 | 54 |
| Fast-Break Points | 13 | 32 |
The numbers reveal an important detail. Dallas did not win because it was dramatically better at finishing inside. Both teams scored 54 points in the paint.
The separation came largely from the perimeter and transition game.
Dallas made eight more three-pointers and converted them at a substantially higher rate. The Mavericks also produced 32 fast-break points, compared with only 13 for Utah. That 19-point difference in transition production is significant in a game decided by 18 points.
Dallas also committed four fewer turnovers while recording three more steals. Those possessions mattered because the Mavericks were able to turn defensive activity into immediate offense.
Final Score and Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown
Dallas won 138-120, but the game was effectively shaped during the first quarter.
| Quarter | Utah Jazz | Dallas Mavericks |
| 1st | 29 | 42 |
| 2nd | 30 | 29 |
| 3rd | 35 | 35 |
| 4th | 26 | 32 |
| Final | 120 | 138 |
Dallas opened with a 42-point first quarter while Utah scored 29.
That created a 13-point gap almost immediately.
Utah did respond in the second quarter, scoring 30 points to Dallas’ 29. The Jazz also matched Dallas 35-35 in the third quarter. However, neither stretch erased the damage created in the opening period.
Dallas then finished the fourth quarter with 32 points while Utah scored 26.
The official NBA game record describes the Mavericks’ victory as a wire-to-wire win. There were no lead changes, and Dallas’ largest lead reached 23 points.
That context is useful because it explains why Utah’s strong shooting percentage did not translate into a competitive finish.
Keyonte George Leads Utah With 29 Points
Keyonte George was Utah’s leading scorer and the game’s highest individual scorer.
He finished with:
- 29 points
- 9-of-15 field goals
- 4-of-6 three-pointers
- 7-of-8 free throws
- 6 assists
- 2 steals
- 1 block
- 1 rebound
George shot 60% from the field and 66.7% from three-point range. His free-throw shooting was also excellent at 87.5%.
This was one of the strongest individual offensive performances in the game.
The important distinction is that George’s efficiency was not the problem. Utah’s challenge was that his production could not compensate for Dallas’ broader offensive output.
George generated 29 points and six assists, giving him a direct role in at least a large portion of Utah’s offense. Yet Dallas had multiple players producing at a high level simultaneously.
That difference between individual production and team-wide production became central to the outcome.
Brice Sensabaugh Provides 25 Points
Brice Sensabaugh was another major contributor for Utah.
He recorded:
- 25 points
- 10-of-20 field goals
- 1-of-7 three-pointers
- 4-of-6 free throws
- 6 rebounds
- 2 assists
Sensabaugh shot 50% from the field and provided Utah with an important secondary scoring option.
His game also illustrates one of the most interesting aspects of the Jazz performance.
Sensabaugh scored efficiently overall, but his three-point shooting was only 1-of-7.
For a team that needed to overcome a large early deficit, additional perimeter efficiency could have changed the shape of the offensive attack. Instead, Utah received much of its production through two-point scoring while Dallas repeatedly punished the Jazz from outside.
Kyle Filipowski Controls the Glass
Kyle Filipowski did not lead Utah in scoring, but his rebounding performance was important.
He finished with 13 points and 12 rebounds, giving him a double-double. The official Jazz game page identifies him as Utah’s leading rebounder.
His 12 rebounds helped Utah remain competitive on the glass despite Dallas finishing with 44 total rebounds compared with Utah’s 41.
The three-rebound difference was relatively small.
That is another reason the final margin cannot be explained simply through rebounding.
Utah competed reasonably well in that area, but Dallas created a much larger advantage through shooting range, transition offense, assists, and turnover control.
Dallas Gets Balanced Scoring From Multiple Players
Klay Thompson led Dallas with 23 points.
Brandon Williams and Max Christie each scored 22, while Naji Marshall added 16 points. Jaden Hardy contributed 12 and Dwight Powell scored 10.
That meant Dallas had six players in double figures.
This balance is one of the clearest themes in the game.
Utah had two players at 25 or more points, but Dallas had three players at 22 or more and three additional players in double figures.
Instead of depending heavily on one offensive creator, Dallas repeatedly found scoring from different parts of its rotation.
That made it harder for Utah to concentrate its defensive attention on one player.
Klay Thompson’s 23-Point Performance
Klay Thompson’s 23 points came entirely in the first half.
He finished 7-of-12 from the field and 6-of-11 from three-point range. He also reached the 17,000-point milestone during the game.
His first-half shooting was particularly damaging because Dallas was already building its advantage.
Thompson scored 23 points in only 20 minutes, giving Dallas an explosive offensive contribution without requiring him to carry the entire game.
His six made three-pointers were also a major part of the Mavericks’ perimeter advantage.
The official Dallas report noted that Thompson’s shooting gravity created additional space for teammates. That is an important tactical point when interpreting a box score. A player’s influence is not limited to his own points. High-volume perimeter threats can change defensive spacing and create better opportunities for other players.
Brandon Williams Adds 22 Points
Brandon Williams matched Max Christie with 22 points.
He also contributed five assists, making his performance more than a pure scoring effort. The official NBA recap listed Williams among Dallas’ major contributors during the win.
His contribution was particularly useful because Dallas did not need to rely exclusively on Thompson’s outside shooting.
When Utah focused more attention on perimeter threats, Dallas still had players capable of creating offense.
That type of secondary production helped the Mavericks maintain their lead after the opening quarter.
Max Christie Delivers 22 Points
Max Christie also finished with 22 points.
His return to the lineup was notable because he had missed the previous two games due to illness. In this matchup, he made four of his six three-point attempts and helped Dallas maintain its perimeter efficiency.
Christie’s performance is a good example of why shooting percentages need context.
Dallas did not merely attempt more three-pointers. The Mavericks also had players capable of converting those attempts efficiently.
Christie’s 4-of-6 shooting from outside gave Dallas another reliable perimeter option alongside Thompson.
That spacing made it more difficult for Utah to collapse defensively.
Jeremiah Robinson-Earl’s Rebounding Impact
Jeremiah Robinson-Earl was Dallas’ leading rebounder according to the supplied game data, with 10 rebounds.
His work on the glass helped Dallas finish with a 44-41 rebounding advantage.
That margin was not huge, but it supported the larger team performance. Dallas did not need to dominate rebounding to win because its strongest advantages came in other areas.
The combination of adequate rebounding and superior perimeter shooting allowed the Mavericks to keep Utah from turning its efficient two-point scoring into a comeback.
Naji Marshall Leads Dallas in Assists
Naji Marshall recorded six assists, matching the highest assist total listed for Dallas.
Dallas finished with 36 assists as a team, compared with Utah’s 30.
That six-assist difference is meaningful because it indicates how effectively Dallas shared offensive responsibility.
The Mavericks also finished with only 11 turnovers.
Utah had 15.
The resulting assist-to-turnover profile favored Dallas, particularly when combined with its 44% three-point shooting.
Shooting Efficiency Explains the Biggest Difference
At first glance, both teams appear almost identical in field-goal percentage.
Utah shot 48-of-89, or 53.9%.
Dallas shot 49-of-91, or 53.8%.
That is essentially the same overall shooting efficiency.
So why did Dallas score 18 more points?
The answer is largely three-point volume and accuracy.
Utah made 10 of 31 three-point attempts.
Dallas made 18 of 41.
That produced an eight-three-pointer advantage.
Because each made three-pointer is worth an additional point compared with a made two-point field goal, that difference alone accounts for a large part of the scoring gap.
Dallas also attempted 36 free throws and made 22.
Utah attempted only 20 and made 14.
So Dallas had advantages both beyond the arc and at the free-throw line.
The Transition Advantage Was Significant
Another major difference was fast-break scoring.
Dallas scored 32 fast-break points.
Utah scored 13.
That gave Dallas a 19-point advantage in transition scoring.
This is one of the most important statistics for anyone studying the game beyond the standard box score.
Transition opportunities often come from defensive rebounds, steals, turnovers, long rebounds and quick changes of possession.
Dallas had eight steals compared with Utah’s five and committed four fewer turnovers.
That combination helped the Mavericks generate more possessions in which Utah’s defense was not fully organized.
The result was a faster and more efficient offensive game for Dallas.
Turnovers Helped Dallas Control Possessions
Utah committed 15 turnovers.
Dallas committed 11.
The four-turnover difference might look modest, but it became more important because Dallas also converted more of its opportunities into transition offense.
Dallas recorded eight steals.
Utah recorded five.
This means Dallas was not simply avoiding mistakes. It was also creating defensive events that could lead to immediate scoring opportunities.
That is reflected in the fast-break numbers.
Points in the Paint Were Even
Both teams scored 54 points in the paint.
That statistic is particularly useful because it removes one possible explanation for the final score.
Dallas did not win because it overwhelmed Utah around the basket.
Instead, the Mavericks matched Utah’s interior scoring while creating a large advantage outside the paint.
This creates a useful contrast:
- Paint scoring: tied at 54-54
- Overall field-goal percentage: essentially tied
- Rebounding: Dallas by 3
- Assists: Dallas by 6
- Turnovers: Dallas committed 4 fewer
- Three-pointers: Dallas made 8 more
- Fast-break points: Dallas by 19
When these numbers are viewed together, the reason for the 138-120 result becomes much clearer.
Why Utah’s 54% Shooting Was Not Enough
A common mistake when reading basketball statistics is to focus on one efficiency number.
Utah shot nearly 54% from the field, which normally looks excellent.
But field-goal percentage treats a made two-point basket and a made three-point basket as if they have the same value.
They do not.
Utah’s 10-of-31 three-point performance produced a 32.3% rate.
Dallas shot 18-of-41 from three, or 43.9%.
That difference gave Dallas significantly more scoring value from the same general level of shooting efficiency.
The Mavericks also had more free-throw attempts.
So although the basic field-goal percentages were almost identical, the value of Dallas’ successful shots was greater.
Utah’s Offensive Distribution
Utah’s leading scorers were George and Sensabaugh.
George produced 29.
Sensabaugh produced 25.
Ace Bailey added 18.
Kyle Filipowski scored 13 while grabbing 12 rebounds.
Cody Williams scored 11.
That provided a reasonable distribution, but the team still struggled to match Dallas‘ volume from outside.
George was particularly efficient from deep, but Utah did not receive enough high-efficiency perimeter production from the rest of the lineup.
Sensabaugh’s 1-of-7 three-point shooting is the clearest example.
Dallas’ Offensive Distribution
Dallas had a wider scoring base.
Thompson scored 23.
Williams and Christie scored 22 each.
Marshall added 16.
Hardy scored 12.
Powell scored 10.
Six Mavericks reached double figures.
That distribution allowed Dallas to maintain offensive pressure throughout the game.
Even when Thompson’s scoring slowed after halftime, the Mavericks still had enough production from other players to prevent Utah from making a serious comeback.
This is especially important because Thompson scored all 23 of his points in the first half.
Dallas did not need him to keep scoring at that rate after halftime because the rest of the roster continued to contribute.
The First Quarter Changed the Game
The 42-29 opening quarter deserves special attention.
Dallas scored 42 points in 12 minutes.
Utah scored 29.
That created a 13-point deficit before the Jazz had enough time to establish a comfortable offensive rhythm.
Utah did not collapse after that.
In fact, the Jazz scored 30 in the second quarter and 35 in the third.
The problem was that Dallas continued scoring at a high level.
The Mavericks produced 29 points in the second, 35 in the third and 32 in the fourth.
So Utah never found the sustained defensive stop sequence required to turn the game around.
Injuries and Availability Context
Availability is important when interpreting individual statistics.
According to the official NBA recap, Lauri Markkanen was unavailable for Utah after being listed as the team’s scoring leader at 27.9 points per game. Walker Kessler was also sidelined with a shoulder issue.
Dallas was also missing important players.
The NBA reported that Cooper Flagg missed his second straight game because of a left ankle sprain. Anthony Davis and Kyrie Irving were also unavailable, while P.J. Washington missed the game for personal reasons.
This context matters because the final box score reflects the players who actually participated.
It should not automatically be treated as a full-strength comparison of both rosters.
What the Matchup Says About Team Offense
The most revealing aspect of this game was that Dallas produced a strong offensive result without relying on one extraordinary individual scoring performance.
Thompson led the team with 23 points, but Williams and Christie each scored 22.
Six players reached double figures.
Dallas also generated 36 assists.
That suggests an offense that consistently found different scoring options.
Utah, meanwhile, received excellent individual performances from George and Sensabaugh, but the overall scoring distribution did not match Dallas’ depth.
The distinction is subtle but important.
A team can have excellent individual scoring and still lose if the opposing team creates more efficient offense across the entire rotation.
What the Game Says About Three-Point Strategy
Three-point shooting was arguably the most visible statistical separator.
Utah attempted 31 three-pointers.
Dallas attempted 41.
Dallas therefore took 10 more shots from beyond the arc and made eight more.
That combination is difficult to overcome.
Utah’s 32.3% three-point shooting meant the Jazz needed to win other areas decisively.
They did not.
Dallas matched Utah in paint scoring, held a small rebounding edge, created more assists, committed fewer turnovers, and generated significantly more transition points.
The result was a complete statistical advantage rather than dependence on one category.
A Practical Way to Read These Player Stats
When analyzing a matchup like this, readers should avoid asking only, “Who scored the most?”
A better approach is to examine five questions:
- Who scored efficiently?
- Who created additional scoring opportunities for teammates?
- Which team generated more valuable shot attempts?
- Which team controlled turnovers and transition possessions?
- Which players influenced the game beyond points?
Using that framework, George had an outstanding offensive game.
Filipowski had a strong rebounding performance.
Sensabaugh provided valuable scoring and secondary playmaking.
For Dallas, Thompson supplied elite first-half shooting, Christie added efficient perimeter scoring, Williams provided scoring and playmaking, Marshall facilitated offense, and Robinson-Earl contributed on the glass.
The game therefore had several meaningful individual performances even though Dallas controlled the overall result.
Official Game Information
The game was played at American Airlines Center in Dallas, Texas, with an announced attendance of 20,031. The officials were Kevin Cutler, Kevin Scott and John Conley.
The official NBA record can be used as the primary reference for the box score and game details: NBA official game box score and summary
Important Date and Series Correction
There are two details in some supplied datasets that should be handled carefully before publication.
First, the official NBA record lists the game date as January 17, 2026.
Second, the NBA’s official recap says Dallas completed a two-game sweep of Utah after Utah had won the January 8 meeting. The January 17 game therefore should not be described as a 2-2 season-series game based on the official record available for this matchup.
For an SEO article, these corrections matter because inaccurate dates or series records can undermine trust even when the main box-score statistics are correct.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who led the Jazz in scoring against the Mavericks?
Keyonte George led Utah with 29 points. He shot 9-of-15 from the field, made four three-pointers and added six assists.
Who was Dallas’ leading scorer?
Klay Thompson led Dallas with 23 points. He scored all 23 in the first half and made six three-pointers.
What was the final score of Jazz vs Mavericks?
Dallas defeated Utah 138-120 at American Airlines Center. The Mavericks led 42-29 after the first quarter and never surrendered the lead.
How many three-pointers did Dallas make?
Dallas made 18 of 41 three-point attempts, a 43.9% success rate. Utah made 10 of 31, or 32.3%.
Who led Utah in rebounds?
Kyle Filipowski led the Jazz with 12 rebounds while also scoring 13 points.
Who led Dallas in assists?
Naji Marshall led the Mavericks with six assists. Dallas finished with 36 team assists.
Conclusion
The utah jazz vs dallas mavericks match player stats show that Dallas’ 138-120 victory was built on several connected advantages rather than one isolated statistic.
Utah shot 53.9% from the field, matched Dallas with 54 points in the paint and received 29 points from Keyonte George plus 25 from Brice Sensabaugh. Kyle Filipowski also produced a double-double with 13 points and 12 rebounds.
Dallas, however, created more offensive value from outside. The Mavericks made 18 three-pointers compared with Utah’s 10, finished with 36 assists, committed only 11 turnovers, recorded eight steals and produced 32 fast-break points.
Klay Thompson’s 23 points, all scored in the first half, set the tone. Brandon Williams and Max Christie each added 22, while six Mavericks reached double figures.
The biggest lesson from the box score is that overall field-goal percentage does not tell the entire story. Both teams shot around 54%, but Dallas generated more points through three-point accuracy, free-throw opportunities, transition offense and balanced playmaking.
For anyone researching this matchup, the most useful statistics are therefore not limited to the scoring leaders. The combination of perimeter efficiency, assists, turnovers, transition scoring and player distribution explains much more clearly why Dallas finished with an 18-point victory.
