Las Vegas Raiders vs Denver Broncos Match Player Stats
The las vegas raiders vs denver broncos match player stats from November 6, 2025, tell the story of a remarkably tight AFC West contest decided by execution rather than overwhelming offensive production. The Denver Broncos defeated the Las Vegas Raiders 10-7, improving to 8-2 overall and 5-0 at home, while Las Vegas dropped to 2-7 and 1-4 on the road. The final score was close, but the underlying numbers reveal several important differences in quarterback efficiency, pass protection, defensive pressure, rushing production, and red-zone execution.
This was not a game dominated by one superstar putting up enormous numbers. Instead, it was a defensive battle in which field position, turnovers, quarterback pressure, and a few explosive plays shaped the outcome. Denver finished with 150 passing yards and 84 rushing yards at the individual level represented in the supplied statistics, while Las Vegas generated 143 receiving yards and 74 rushing yards. Both teams struggled to create sustained offensive rhythm.
For readers studying the las vegas raiders vs denver broncos match player stats, the most useful approach is to look beyond the final score. Geno Smith completed 16 of 26 passes for 143 yards but threw an interception and was sacked six times. Bo Nix completed 16 of 28 attempts for 150 yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions while taking one recorded sack. Those figures alone show why this game cannot be evaluated simply by looking at completion percentage or passing yardage.
The statistics also show how Denver’s defense controlled the line of scrimmage. The Broncos recorded six sacks and 11 quarterback hits as a team, compared with two sacks and four quarterback hits for Las Vegas. That difference became one of the clearest statistical separators in a game where only three points separated the teams.
las vegas raiders vs denver broncos match player stats: Game Overview
The November 6, 2025 matchup ended with Denver winning 10-7.
| Category | Las Vegas Raiders | Denver Broncos |
| Final score | 7 | 10 |
| Overall record after game | 2-7 | 8-2 |
| Away/Home record | 1-4 away | 5-0 home |
| Team passing | 16/27, 114 yards | 16/28, 136 yards |
| Team rushing | 25 carries, 74 yards | 27 carries, 84 yards |
| Team receiving | 16 receptions, 143 yards | 16 receptions, 150 yards |
| Team sacks | 2 | 6 |
| Team tackles | 60 | 69 |
| Team QB hits | 4 | 11 |
| Interceptions | 2 | 1 |
| Field goals | 0/1 | 1/2 |
At first glance, the offensive totals are surprisingly similar. Both teams recorded 16 receptions. Denver had only seven more receiving yards than Las Vegas, while the rushing difference was just 10 yards.
The major difference came from defensive pressure.
Denver’s defense produced six sacks, five tackles for loss, and 11 quarterback hits. Las Vegas recorded two sacks, four tackles for loss, and four quarterback hits. In a seven-point game, those additional pressure plays had enormous value.
A Low-Scoring Game With High Defensive Influence
The 10-7 final score indicates that neither offense consistently controlled the game.
Las Vegas moved the ball through short and intermediate completions, but the offense struggled to protect the quarterback. Geno Smith’s six sacks are especially significant because they reduced the effectiveness of otherwise respectable passing production.
Denver’s offense was not dramatically better. Bo Nix threw two interceptions and finished with a 54.2 passer rating according to the supplied data. Yet Denver managed to produce the only passing touchdown of the game, and that touchdown became decisive.
This is an important lesson when analyzing individual statistics: production and efficiency are not always the same thing.
A quarterback can finish with more yards but still have a less effective overall performance if sacks, interceptions, and lost opportunities outweigh the yardage gained.
Geno Smith Passing Performance
Geno Smith was the primary Las Vegas quarterback and completed 16 of 26 attempts for 143 passing yards.
His supplied statistical line was:
| Statistic | Geno Smith |
| Completions/Attempts | 16/26 |
| Passing yards | 143 |
| Average | 5.5 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Sacks | 6 for 29 yards |
| QBR | 11.0 |
| Passer rating | 60.3 |
Smith completed approximately 61.5% of his passes, which is respectable in isolation. The problem was what happened around those completions.
Six sacks for 29 yards dramatically changed the shape of the passing game. The quarterback was repeatedly put in difficult situations, limiting the offense’s ability to stay ahead of the chains.
The 11.0 QBR figure supplied for Smith also reflects how difficult the overall performance was. His 60.3 passer rating was higher than Bo Nix’s 54.2, but that does not mean Las Vegas had the more effective passing offense.
Kenny Pickett’s Limited Appearance
Kenny Pickett appeared for one passing attempt and did not complete it.
His supplied line was:
| Statistic | Kenny Pickett |
| Completions/Attempts | 0/1 |
| Passing yards | 0 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| QBR | 3.6 |
| Passer rating | 39.6 |
With only one attempt, there is little analytical value in comparing Pickett’s performance directly with Smith’s. His appearance was too limited to meaningfully affect an evaluation of the Raiders’ passing attack.
Bo Nix Passing Performance
Bo Nix completed 16 of 28 attempts for 150 yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions.
| Statistic | Bo Nix |
| Completions/Attempts | 16/28 |
| Passing yards | 150 |
| Average | 5.4 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 2 |
| Sacks | 1 for 9 yards |
| QBR | 25.5 |
| Passer rating | 54.2 |
Nix’s performance was statistically uneven.
He threw two interceptions, which is a major negative in any game, particularly a low-scoring contest. Yet he also produced the game’s only passing touchdown and avoided the level of sack pressure that affected Smith.
That contrast is central to understanding the game.
Smith had a better listed passer rating, while Nix had the touchdown that ultimately helped Denver win. Nix’s lower rating does not erase the importance of his touchdown, just as the two interceptions do not erase the value of Denver’s ability to protect him.
Quarterback Comparison
| Metric | Geno Smith | Bo Nix |
| Completions | 16 | 16 |
| Attempts | 26 | 28 |
| Passing yards | 143 | 150 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 2 |
| Sacks | 6 | 1 |
| QBR | 11.0 | 25.5 |
| Passer rating | 60.3 | 54.2 |
The most revealing statistic may be the sack difference.
Denver allowed one recorded sack of Nix, while Las Vegas allowed six of Smith. That is a five-sack advantage for the Broncos’ defense in a game decided by three points.
Ashton Jeanty Leads Las Vegas on the Ground
Ashton Jeanty was Las Vegas’ leading rusher.
He finished with 19 carries for 60 yards and one touchdown, averaging 3.2 yards per carry. His longest run was 10 yards.
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Ashton Jeanty | 19 | 60 | 3.2 | 1 | 10 |
| Tre Tucker | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | 7 |
| Geno Smith | 3 | 7 | 2.3 | 0 | 6 |
| Raheem Mostert | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 |
| Brock Bowers | 1 | -4 | -4.0 | 0 | -4 |
| Team | 25 | 74 | 3.0 | 1 | 10 |
Jeanty’s workload was clearly the largest among Las Vegas runners. Nineteen carries represented the bulk of the team’s rushing attempts.
However, his 3.2 yards per carry illustrates the difficulty Las Vegas had creating consistent rushing efficiency. A 60-yard performance sounds substantial, but the average tells us that the Raiders generally needed multiple attempts to generate meaningful yardage.
The team rushing average of 3.0 yards per carry reinforces that point.
Denver Rushing Leaders
J.K. Dobbins led Denver with 18 carries for 77 yards.
His 4.3 yards per carry was notably higher than Jeanty’s 3.2.
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| J.K. Dobbins | 18 | 77 | 4.3 | 0 | 13 |
| RJ Harvey | 4 | 9 | 2.3 | 0 | 7 |
| Bo Nix | 5 | -2 | -0.4 | 0 | 1 |
| Team | 27 | 84 | 3.1 | 0 | 13 |
Denver’s 84 rushing yards were only 10 more than Las Vegas’ 74, so this was not a case of the Broncos completely overpowering the Raiders on the ground.
Instead, the difference was consistency.
Dobbins averaged 4.3 yards per carry and produced a 13-yard long run. That gave Denver a more efficient primary rushing option than Las Vegas had during the game.
Las Vegas Receiving Statistics
Tyler Lockett led the Raiders in receptions and receiving yards.
He caught five passes for 44 yards on six targets, averaging 8.8 yards per reception. His longest reception covered 19 yards.
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Long | Targets |
| Tyler Lockett | 5 | 44 | 8.8 | 0 | 19 | 6 |
| Brock Bowers | 1 | 31 | 31.0 | 0 | 31 | 3 |
| Tre Tucker | 2 | 28 | 14.0 | 0 | 25 | 3 |
| Michael Mayer | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 0 | 11 | 4 |
| Raheem Mostert | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 | 11 | 1 |
| Dont’e Thornton Jr. | 1 | 4 | 4.0 | 0 | 4 | 2 |
| Ashton Jeanty | 3 | 3 | 1.0 | 0 | 6 | 5 |
| Jack Bech | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Team | 16 | 143 | 8.9 | 0 | 31 | 25 |
The most interesting individual number belongs to Brock Bowers.
Bowers caught only one pass, but that reception went for 31 yards. His 31.0 yards per reception was easily the highest figure among Las Vegas players with a reception.
That illustrates how a small sample can contain significant offensive value. Bowers was not heavily involved statistically, but his lone catch generated a substantial chunk of the passing offense.
Lockett, meanwhile, provided the most reliable volume. His five catches accounted for the highest reception total on the Raiders.
Denver Receiving Statistics
Denver’s receiving group produced 150 yards on 16 receptions.
Pat Bryant led the team in yardage despite making only one reception.
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Long | Targets |
| Pat Bryant | 1 | 43 | 43.0 | 0 | 43 | 2 |
| Troy Franklin | 5 | 40 | 8.0 | 1 | 18 | 9 |
| Courtland Sutton | 3 | 24 | 8.0 | 0 | 14 | 4 |
| Adam Prentice | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 0 | 13 | 1 |
| Evan Engram | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 0 | 7 | 5 |
| RJ Harvey | 2 | 9 | 4.5 | 0 | 7 | 3 |
| J.K. Dobbins | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | 7 | 1 |
| Adam Trautman | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Tyler Badie | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Team | 16 | 150 | 9.4 | 1 | 43 | 27 |
Troy Franklin was the most productive Denver receiver by volume and scoring impact. He caught five passes for 40 yards and scored the team’s only receiving touchdown.
His nine targets were also the most on the Broncos.
Pat Bryant’s one catch for 43 yards was the biggest explosive receiving play listed for either team. That single reception exceeded the entire receiving yardage of several individual contributors.
This is why looking at long gains can add context to conventional receiving totals. Denver averaged 9.4 yards per reception as a team, compared with 8.9 for Las Vegas.
Defensive Player Stats: Where Denver Created Separation
The defensive statistics are arguably the most important part of this matchup.
Denver finished with 69 total tackles, 35 solo tackles, six sacks, five tackles for loss, three passes defended, and 11 quarterback hits.
Las Vegas recorded 60 total tackles, 32 solo tackles, two sacks, four tackles for loss, four passes defended, and four quarterback hits.
| Defensive Metric | Las Vegas | Denver |
| Total tackles | 60 | 69 |
| Solo tackles | 32 | 35 |
| Sacks | 2 | 6 |
| Tackles for loss | 4 | 5 |
| Passes defended | 4 | 3 |
| QB hits | 4 | 11 |
| Defensive TDs | 0 | 0 |
The 11-4 advantage in quarterback hits is particularly telling.
Denver was consistently able to affect the quarterback even on plays that did not end in sacks. That kind of pressure can alter timing, force hurried decisions, and shrink the quarterback’s available options.
Las Vegas Defensive Leaders
Jeremy Chinn led the Raiders with nine total tackles.
Devin White recorded seven total tackles, while Charles Snowden contributed six tackles, one sack, one tackle for loss, one pass defended, and two quarterback hits.
| Player | Total Tackles | Solo | Sacks | TFL | PD | QB Hits |
| Jeremy Chinn | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Devin White | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Charles Snowden | 6 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Maxx Crosby | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Snowden was particularly effective in the supplied defensive statistics. His one sack and two quarterback hits gave him a noticeable impact despite recording six total tackles.
Maxx Crosby finished with five total tackles. His statistical line did not include a sack or quarterback hit in the supplied data, illustrating that even prominent defensive players can have relatively quiet box-score performances in an individual game.
Denver Defensive Leaders
Talanoa Hufanga and Alex Singleton each recorded nine total tackles, giving them the highest tackle totals among Denver defenders listed.
Hufanga also recorded a sack, one tackle for loss, and one quarterback hit.
Nik Bonitto produced one of the strongest pressure performances with 1.5 sacks, two tackles for loss, and three quarterback hits.
| Player | Total Tackles | Solo | Sacks | TFL | PD | QB Hits |
| Talanoa Hufanga | 9 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Alex Singleton | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nik Bonitto | 5 | 4 | 1.5 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Brandon Jones | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Riley Moss | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Bonitto’s three quarterback hits stand out because they demonstrate pressure beyond the official sack count.
Hufanga combined tackling volume with direct quarterback disruption, while Riley Moss contributed a tackle for loss and a pass defended.
The broader picture is clear: Denver’s defense created more disruption throughout the game.
Turnovers and Hidden Swing Plays
Turnovers were another major part of the statistical story.
Las Vegas recorded two fumbles but did not lose either one according to the supplied data. The Raiders also recorded two interceptions, with Kyu Blu Kelly returning the interceptions for a combined 26 yards.
Denver recorded one interception by Dondrea Tillman, who returned it 23 yards.
| Turnover Category | Las Vegas | Denver |
| Fumbles | 2 | 0 |
| Fumbles lost | 0 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 2 | 1 |
| Interception return yards | 26 | 23 |
This creates an interesting contradiction.
Las Vegas generated more interceptions but still lost the game.
That is an important reminder that turnover totals alone do not explain every outcome. The timing of turnovers matters, as does what a team does with the resulting possessions.
In a 10-7 game, every possession carries more weight than it would in a high-scoring shootout.
Special Teams and Field Position
Special teams played an understated role in the contest.
Daniel Carlson went 0-for-1 on field goals but converted his only extra-point attempt for one point.
Wil Lutz went 1-for-2 on field goals, including a 32-yard make, and also converted his extra-point attempt. He finished with four points.
| Kicker | Field Goals | Extra Points | Points |
| Daniel Carlson | 0/1 | 1/1 | 1 |
| Wil Lutz | 1/2 | 1/1 | 4 |
The missed Las Vegas field goal is significant when analyzing a game decided by three points.
However, it would be too simplistic to say that the missed kick alone caused the defeat. The Raiders also had problems protecting Smith, struggled to generate consistent rushing efficiency, and failed to score a passing touchdown.
Punting Comparison
AJ Cole punted seven times for 299 yards, averaging 42.7 yards per punt. He placed three inside the 20 and recorded a 48-yard long.
Jeremy Crawshaw also punted seven times for Denver, producing 293 yards at an average of 41.9 yards. His longest punt traveled 54 yards, but he recorded zero punts inside the 20 according to the supplied data.
The punting statistics show that both teams repeatedly relied on field-position football.
Seven punts apiece is another indicator of how difficult it was for either offense to sustain drives.
The Most Important Statistical Matchups
When examining the las vegas raiders vs denver broncos match player stats, several individual matchups and statistical contrasts deserve more attention than the headline numbers.
Geno Smith vs Denver’s Pass Rush
This was arguably the most important matchup.
Smith was sacked six times while Denver recorded 11 quarterback hits.
The Raiders’ passing game could not fully compensate for that pressure. Even though Smith completed 16 passes and produced 143 listed passing yards, the offense repeatedly lost momentum because of negative plays.
Bo Nix vs Las Vegas’ Secondary
Nix threw two interceptions, showing that Las Vegas was capable of creating turnover opportunities.
Kyu Blu Kelly’s two interceptions were especially notable.
Yet Denver’s offense still produced the game’s only passing touchdown. That combination of mistakes and timely production helped produce a narrow victory.
Ashton Jeanty vs J.K. Dobbins
Jeanty carried the ball 19 times for 60 yards.
Dobbins carried it 18 times for 77 yards.
The workload was nearly identical, but Dobbins averaged 4.3 yards per carry compared with Jeanty’s 3.2.
That 1.1-yard difference per carry became meaningful over nearly two dozen attempts.
What the Numbers Say About Offensive Efficiency
The offensive statistics suggest that neither team consistently moved the ball with ease.
Las Vegas recorded 74 rushing yards and 143 receiving yards in the supplied individual receiving data.
Denver recorded 84 rushing yards and 150 receiving yards.
The overall production was close.
That makes Denver’s protection advantage even more important.
A five-sack difference is enormous in a contest where offensive yardage was separated by relatively small margins.
Denver’s defense also recorded seven more total tackles and seven more quarterback hits than Las Vegas. Those numbers point toward a team that spent more time actively disrupting the opposing offense.
What Las Vegas Could Have Done Better
The Raiders’ statistical profile points toward several areas for improvement.
Protect the Quarterback
Six sacks for 29 yards is the most obvious problem.
Regardless of quarterback quality, an offense will struggle to maintain rhythm when it repeatedly allows drives to end in major negative plays.
Improve Rushing Efficiency
Jeanty’s 60 yards on 19 carries produced a 3.2-yard average.
The Raiders’ team average was only 3.0 yards per carry.
A more efficient ground game could have reduced pressure on Smith and created more favorable down-and-distance situations.
Convert Offensive Opportunities
The Raiders scored only seven points.
Even with two defensive interceptions, they were unable to turn their defensive production into enough points to win.
The missed field goal also mattered because the final margin was only three points.
What Denver Did Well
Denver’s victory was built on several complementary strengths.
The Pass Rush Was the Defining Advantage
Six sacks and 11 quarterback hits were the strongest defensive numbers in the game.
Denver consistently made Smith uncomfortable.
Dobbins Provided Better Rushing Efficiency
Dobbins’ 77 yards on 18 carries gave Denver a more productive primary running attack.
His 13-yard long run also provided an explosive element.
Franklin Delivered a Touchdown
Troy Franklin caught five passes for 40 yards and scored Denver’s only receiving touchdown.
He also received nine targets, the most among Denver receivers listed.
His combination of volume and scoring production made him one of Denver’s most important offensive contributors.
Why the Final Score Was So Close
The statistics explain why this game was close.
Neither offense generated huge numbers. Both teams had 16 receptions. Their rushing totals were separated by only 10 yards. Passing yardage was also relatively close.
The major separation came from pressure and scoring efficiency.
Denver generated more sacks, more quarterback hits, more total tackles, and slightly more rushing and receiving production. At the same time, the Broncos survived two interceptions by Nix and still found enough offense to score 10 points.
This is the profile of a defensive, field-position-oriented game.
It was not about one team dominating every statistical category.
It was about Denver winning enough of the most influential categories.
Player Performance Grades Based on the Supplied Statistics
A statistical grading framework can provide another way to interpret the game. These are analytical grades based only on the supplied box-score information, not official team grades.
Las Vegas
Ashton Jeanty: B
Heavy workload and a rushing touchdown, but only 3.2 yards per carry.
Tyler Lockett: B+
Five receptions on six targets and 44 yards made him Las Vegas’ most consistent receiver.
Brock Bowers: B
Only one reception, but the 31-yard gain was highly efficient.
Charles Snowden: B+
One sack, one tackle for loss, one pass defended, and two quarterback hits gave him meaningful defensive impact.
Kyu Blu Kelly: A
Two interceptions and 26 return yards represented major defensive production.
Geno Smith: C+
Decent completion volume and 143 yards, but one interception and six sacks severely limited the overall impact.
Denver
J.K. Dobbins: A-
77 rushing yards on 18 carries at 4.3 yards per attempt.
Troy Franklin: A-
Five catches, 40 yards, nine targets, and the game’s only receiving touchdown.
Pat Bryant: B+
One reception, but it covered 43 yards and represented Denver’s biggest listed receiving play.
Talanoa Hufanga: A-
Nine tackles, one sack, one tackle for loss, and one quarterback hit.
Nik Bonitto: A
1.5 sacks, two tackles for loss, and three quarterback hits.
Bo Nix: C
150 yards and one touchdown helped Denver win, but two interceptions and a 54.2 passer rating limited his statistical grade.
Key Takeaways From the Match
The biggest lessons from this matchup can be summarized in several points:
- Denver’s pass rush was the defining statistical advantage. Six sacks compared with two for Las Vegas created a major difference in offensive efficiency.
- Geno Smith’s raw passing numbers were better than his overall impact suggested. His 143 yards and 60.3 passer rating were respectable, but six sacks and an interception made sustained offense difficult.
- Bo Nix had a mistake-filled but ultimately productive performance. Two interceptions hurt Denver, but his passing touchdown helped provide the winning margin.
- J.K. Dobbins was more efficient than Ashton Jeanty. Dobbins averaged 4.3 yards per carry, compared with Jeanty’s 3.2.
- Troy Franklin was Denver’s most important receiver by volume and scoring. He led the team with five receptions and nine targets while scoring the only receiving touchdown.
- Kyu Blu Kelly produced two interceptions for Las Vegas. Despite that defensive production, the Raiders could not convert enough opportunities into points.
- Special teams mattered. Denver’s Wil Lutz made one field goal, while Las Vegas’ Daniel Carlson missed his only field-goal attempt.
- The game was decided by small margins. The offensive yardage gap was modest, but Denver’s pressure, protection, and scoring efficiency proved more influential.
How to Read NFL Player Statistics More Effectively
A common mistake when evaluating a football game is to focus on the biggest yardage total.
That approach can miss the actual reason a team won.
A better method is to examine statistics in layers.
First, look at scoring. Then examine turnovers. After that, evaluate quarterback efficiency and pressure. Next, consider rushing efficiency and explosive plays. Finally, review field position and special teams.
For this matchup, that process immediately highlights the difference between the two teams.
The passing yardage was close.
The receiving totals were close.
The rushing totals were close.
But the quarterback pressure was not close.
Denver produced six sacks and 11 quarterback hits. Las Vegas produced two sacks and four quarterback hits.
That is the type of underlying statistic that can explain a narrow victory much better than total yardage alone.
For official NFL statistical information and broader league data, readers can consult the NFL statistics database.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Las Vegas Raiders vs Denver Broncos game on November 6, 2025?
The Denver Broncos defeated the Las Vegas Raiders 10-7 on November 6, 2025.
What were Geno Smith’s stats against the Broncos?
Geno Smith completed 16 of 26 passes for 143 yards, with no touchdowns and one interception. He was recorded as being sacked six times for 29 yards.
How did Bo Nix perform against the Raiders?
Bo Nix completed 16 of 28 passes for 150 yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions. He was recorded with one sack for nine yards.
Who was the leading rusher in the game?
J.K. Dobbins led Denver with 77 rushing yards on 18 carries. Ashton Jeanty led Las Vegas with 60 rushing yards on 19 carries and scored one rushing touchdown.
Which defense recorded more sacks?
Denver recorded six team sacks, while Las Vegas recorded two. The Broncos also registered 11 quarterback hits compared with four for the Raiders.
Who led the receiving statistics?
For Las Vegas, Tyler Lockett led the team with five receptions for 44 yards. For Denver, Troy Franklin had five receptions for 40 yards and one touchdown, while Pat Bryant recorded the team’s longest reception at 43 yards.
Conclusion
The las vegas raiders vs denver broncos match player stats reveal a game that was much more competitive than the teams’ records might suggest. Las Vegas entered the contest at 2-7, while Denver was 8-2 and unbeaten at home, yet the Raiders stayed within three points throughout a low-scoring defensive battle.
The most important statistical difference was Denver’s ability to pressure Geno Smith. Six sacks and 11 quarterback hits created repeated negative plays and made it difficult for Las Vegas to maintain offensive rhythm. Denver’s rushing attack was also slightly more efficient, with J.K. Dobbins averaging 4.3 yards per carry compared with Ashton Jeanty’s 3.2.
Las Vegas did create significant defensive opportunities. Kyu Blu Kelly recorded two interceptions, and Charles Snowden generated a sack and two quarterback hits. However, those defensive plays did not translate into enough points.
On offense, Tyler Lockett provided reliable volume for the Raiders, while Brock Bowers produced a 31-yard reception despite limited involvement. Denver received a major explosive contribution from Pat Bryant and a touchdown from Troy Franklin.
Bo Nix’s two interceptions prevented Denver from producing a clean offensive performance, but the Broncos’ defense compensated by creating consistent pressure. Wil Lutz’s field goal also proved valuable in a game where every point mattered.
Ultimately, the 10-7 result was shaped less by overwhelming offensive production and more by pressure, protection, rushing efficiency, turnovers, and special teams execution. That is what makes the statistical profile of this matchup particularly useful: the final score was close, but the underlying numbers explain exactly where Denver gained enough of an advantage to secure the victory.
