Milwaukee Brewers vs Chicago Cubs Match Player Stats
The milwaukee brewers vs chicago cubs match player stats from June 27, 2026, tell a clear story about a game in which Milwaukee combined timely power, stronger overall contact, and an effective starting pitching performance to defeat Chicago 6-2 at American Family Field. The Brewers finished with 11 hits and two home runs, while the Cubs managed only three hits and one home run. J. Misiorowski delivered six innings of two-hit, one-run baseball with eight strikeouts, earning the win as Milwaukee improved to 50-29 at the time of the game.
For anyone studying this matchup beyond the final score, the numbers offer several useful details. Chicago actually drew seven walks and struck out eight times, while Milwaukee drew five walks and also struck out eight times. The Cubs went 0-for-4 with runners in scoring position, while the Brewers went 2-for-15. That means Milwaukee did not need to convert a high percentage of its opportunities to create separation because its 11-hit attack and two home runs provided enough offensive pressure.
The game also had important National League Central context. Milwaukee entered the contest with a 50-29 record and a 26-15 home mark, while Chicago was 44-38 overall and 21-21 on the road. The attendance of 41,021 added to the significance of the matchup at American Family Field.
Milwaukee Brewers vs Chicago Cubs Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The June 27 matchup between the Chicago Cubs and Milwaukee Brewers ended with Milwaukee winning 6-2. The Brewers played at home at American Family Field in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Here are the core numbers from the game:
| Category | Chicago Cubs | Milwaukee Brewers |
| Runs | 2 | 6 |
| Hits | 3 | 11 |
| Errors | 1 | 0 |
| Home Runs | 1 | 2 |
| Runs Batted In | 2 | 6 |
| Walks | 7 | 5 |
| Strikeouts | 8 | 8 |
| Runners in Scoring Position | 0-for-4 | 2-for-15 |
The difference in total hits was the most obvious offensive separation. Milwaukee collected 11 hits compared with only three for Chicago. That 8-hit advantage gave the Brewers substantially more opportunities to advance runners and score.
Chicago’s offense did produce one home run, with S. Suzuki hitting his 11th of the season. However, the Cubs did not generate enough additional contact to turn their seven walks into a larger offensive total.
Milwaukee received home runs from W. Contreras and G. Mitchell. Contreras hit his ninth homer, while Mitchell hit his sixth.
The Brewers also recorded several extra-base hits. C. Yelich, J. Chourio, and C. Pratt each produced doubles, while D. Hamilton recorded a triple. Milwaukee also stole bases through D. Hamilton, S. Frelick, and C. Pratt.
These details show that Milwaukee’s offense was not dependent on home runs alone. The Brewers combined home-run power with doubles, a triple, stolen bases, and 11 total hits.
Starting Pitching Comparison
Starting pitching was one of the most important statistical differences in this matchup.
Milwaukee starter J. Misiorowski worked six innings and allowed two hits and one earned run. He walked four batters but struck out eight. His final pitching line was:
- 6.0 innings
- 2 hits allowed
- 1 earned run
- 4 walks
- 8 strikeouts
- 68 game score
- 9-3 record after the win
Chicago starter C. Rea also provided a respectable outing, particularly in terms of limiting early damage. Rea pitched five innings and allowed five hits and one earned run. He walked three and struck out four.
His line was:
- 5.0 innings
- 5 hits allowed
- 1 earned run
- 3 walks
- 4 strikeouts
- 54 game score
The important distinction is that Rea’s five innings gave Chicago less starting-pitcher coverage than Misiorowski’s six innings. Misiorowski also generated twice as many strikeouts.
J. Misiorowski’s Performance
Misiorowski’s six-inning performance stands out in the milwaukee brewers vs chicago cubs match player stats because he limited Chicago to just two hits.
The four walks were the main area of concern in his line. Walks can extend innings and create scoring opportunities even when a pitcher is avoiding hits. However, the Cubs were unable to turn those opportunities into enough production.
Eight strikeouts also helped Misiorowski escape potential trouble. His 68 game score was higher than Rea’s 54, reflecting the stronger overall starting performance recorded in the supplied statistics.
The key point is that Misiorowski did not need a perfect control performance to be effective. He allowed four walks, but the limited number of hits and eight strikeouts kept Chicago from producing sustained offensive pressure.
C. Rea’s Performance
- Rea’s five innings included only one earned run, which is a relatively controlled pitching line considering Milwaukee eventually scored six runs.
The challenge for Chicago was what happened after the starting pitcher left the game.
The Cubs’ pitching staff ultimately allowed 11 hits, six runs, six earned runs, five walks, eight strikeouts, and two home runs across eight innings. The contrast between Rea’s individual line and the overall pitching line shows that Milwaukee’s offensive production increased after the game moved beyond the starting pitching matchup.
Rea’s five innings therefore cannot be evaluated simply from the final 6-2 score. His individual line shows that he limited Milwaukee to one earned run during his five innings, while the rest of the pitching staff absorbed the larger share of the damage.
Chicago Cubs Offensive Performance
Chicago finished the game with only three hits, two runs, two RBIs, and one home run.
The Cubs’ team batting line was:
- 28 at-bats
- 2 runs
- 3 hits
- 2 RBIs
- 1 home run
- 7 walks
- 8 strikeouts
One of the most interesting parts of this line is the relationship between walks and hits.
Chicago reached base through seven walks, but only three hits were recorded. The Cubs therefore had opportunities to put runners on base without producing many balls in play that became hits.
The biggest problem came with runners in scoring position. Chicago went 0-for-4 in those situations.
That statistic matters because a team can sometimes overcome a low hit total by converting its limited scoring opportunities. Chicago did not do that in this game.
S. Suzuki’s Home Run
- Suzuki provided Chicago’s only home run, his 11th of the season.
That home run accounted for an important portion of the Cubs’ offensive output, but one long ball could not compensate for the team’s overall lack of hits.
The broader offensive picture is therefore more important than the home run itself. Chicago finished with three total hits, and Suzuki’s home run was the only homer among them.
Seven Walks for Chicago
The seven walks deserve attention because they show that the Cubs were not completely shut down at the plate.
A team can create offensive pressure through several routes, including hits, walks, extra-base hits, and baserunning. Chicago’s seven walks gave the lineup opportunities to extend innings.
However, those walks did not lead to enough scoring.
This is one of the clearest lessons from the box score. Reaching base is valuable, but the final offensive result depends on what happens after runners reach.
Milwaukee Brewers Offensive Performance
Milwaukee produced a much more diverse offensive attack.
The Brewers recorded:
- 33 at-bats
- 6 runs
- 11 hits
- 6 RBIs
- 2 home runs
- 5 walks
- 8 strikeouts
The 11-hit total was the foundation of the victory.
Milwaukee also generated three doubles and one triple from the players identified in the supplied game data. C. Yelich, J. Chourio, and C. Pratt recorded doubles, while D. Hamilton recorded a triple.
The Brewers also stole three bases, with D. Hamilton, S. Frelick, and C. Pratt credited with stolen bases.
This combination created multiple ways for Milwaukee to advance runners.
W. Contreras’ Ninth Home Run
- Contreras hit his ninth home run of the season for Milwaukee.
His home run was one of two Brewers homers in the game and contributed to the team’s six-run total.
Milwaukee’s two home runs were important, but the team’s 11-hit total provides a broader explanation of its offensive success. The Brewers were able to create production through both power and base hits.
G. Mitchell’s Sixth Home Run
- Mitchell also homered, recording his sixth home run of the season.
Having two different players hit home runs gave Milwaukee additional power within the lineup. When combined with the doubles, triple, and stolen bases listed in the game statistics, the Brewers’ offensive approach was not limited to one type of production.
Extra-Base Hits Made a Difference
Extra-base hits are particularly useful for understanding this matchup.
The Brewers recorded doubles from C. Yelich, J. Chourio, and C. Pratt. D. Hamilton added a triple.
That means Milwaukee created significant advancement opportunities without requiring multiple singles in every scoring sequence.
An extra-base hit can move a runner several bases at once. It can also put the hitter into scoring position immediately.
Chicago did have a home run from S. Suzuki, but the Cubs did not generate the same volume of extra-base production across the lineup.
The difference between three total Cubs hits and 11 Brewers hits ultimately made it difficult for Chicago to sustain offensive innings.
Baserunning and Stolen Bases
The Brewers also used their speed.
- Hamilton, S. Frelick, and C. Pratt each recorded a stolen base.
Three stolen bases can influence the shape of an inning even when they do not directly appear as runs on the scoreboard. Moving a runner into scoring position can reduce the number of productive plays needed to score.
Hamilton’s contribution was particularly notable because the supplied statistics credit him with both a triple and a stolen base.
- Pratt also appears in multiple categories, with a double and a stolen base listed. These are examples of how individual contributions can extend beyond a single batting statistic.
Milwaukee Brewers vs Chicago Cubs Match Player Stats: RISP Analysis
The runners-in-scoring-position numbers present an unusual part of this game.
Milwaukee went 2-for-15 with runners in scoring position.
Chicago went 0-for-4.
At first glance, Milwaukee’s 2-for-15 result may look inefficient. Yet the Brewers still scored six runs.
That tells us that RISP conversion alone does not explain the final score.
Milwaukee created enough offensive opportunities through 11 hits, home runs, extra-base hits, walks, and stolen bases that it could score six runs despite going 2-for-15 in the specific RISP category.
Chicago had fewer total opportunities because it managed only three hits. Even with seven walks, the Cubs could not convert their four recorded RISP opportunities.
This is why looking at one statistic in isolation can give an incomplete picture of a baseball game.
Pitching Staff Comparison
The full pitching lines provide another useful perspective.
Cubs Pitching
Chicago’s pitching staff recorded:
- 8.0 innings
- 11 hits allowed
- 6 runs allowed
- 6 earned runs
- 5 walks
- 8 strikeouts
- 2 home runs allowed
The pitching staff produced eight strikeouts, matching Milwaukee’s total, but the 11 hits allowed were the major problem.
Chicago also surrendered two home runs.
Brewers Pitching
Milwaukee’s staff recorded:
- 9.0 innings
- 3 hits allowed
- 2 runs allowed
- 2 earned runs
- 7 walks
- 8 strikeouts
- 1 home run allowed
The Brewers allowed more walks than Chicago, seven compared with five, but they allowed dramatically fewer hits.
That difference is central to understanding the game.
Milwaukee gave up seven walks but only three hits. Chicago gave up five walks and 11 hits.
The contrast shows why simply comparing walk totals would not adequately describe the pitching performance.
What the Box Score Says About Contact Quality
The supplied statistics do not include detailed exit velocity, launch angle, barrel percentage, or other advanced ball-tracking measurements, so those metrics should not be invented or assumed.
However, the traditional box score still provides a useful picture.
Milwaukee had:
- 11 hits
- 2 home runs
- 3 doubles
- 1 triple
- 3 stolen bases
Chicago had:
- 3 hits
- 1 home run
- 7 walks
The Brewers therefore generated substantially more offensive activity through balls that resulted in hits and extra bases.
Chicago’s seven walks indicate that the lineup found ways to reach base, but the limited hit total prevented those opportunities from producing enough runs.
Game Flow and Why the Score Reached 6-2
The final score of 6-2 can be understood through three broad statistical differences.
First, Milwaukee produced eight more hits.
Second, Milwaukee hit two home runs compared with Chicago’s one.
Third, the Brewers’ pitching staff allowed only three hits while Chicago’s staff surrendered 11.
Those three differences created a strong statistical foundation for Milwaukee’s victory.
The RISP figures add an important layer. Neither team was especially efficient in those situations, but Milwaukee had far more overall offensive production to work with.
Chicago’s 0-for-4 RISP performance meant that its limited scoring opportunities were not converted.
Home and Road Context
The teams entered the game with different records.
Chicago was 44-38 overall and 21-21 on the road.
Milwaukee was 50-29 overall and 26-15 at home.
These records provide context for the June 27 matchup without needing to interpret them beyond the numbers.
Milwaukee’s 26-15 home record meant the Brewers had won 26 of their first 41 home games at the time. Chicago’s 21-21 road record was exactly even.
The game was therefore played in a venue where Milwaukee had already recorded a positive home record, while Chicago entered with an even road record.
National League Central Context
The supplied standings information also places the game within the National League Central race.
The Brewers were listed as the division leader at 98-59 with a .624 winning percentage, while the Cubs were second at 87-70 with a .554 winning percentage and 11 games behind.
These figures are separate from the teams’ records listed around the June 27 game and appear to represent a later standings snapshot. They should therefore not be confused with the records immediately surrounding the game.
That distinction is important when publishing historical sports content. A game played on June 27 should be described using the records applicable to that game when discussing its immediate context. Later-season standings can be included only when clearly labeled as later information.
Attendance and Game Details
The game attracted 41,021 spectators at American Family Field.
The contest lasted 2 hours and 55 minutes.
Apple TV provided coverage.
The home plate umpire was Nic Lentz. The first base umpire was Hunter Wendelstedt, the second base umpire was Vic Carapazza, and the third base umpire was Edwin Moscoso.
These details are not directly responsible for the final score, but they are useful for readers looking for a complete game record.
The attendance figure also shows that the matchup attracted more than 40,000 spectators.
Player Contributions That Stand Out
A useful way to study the game is to separate individual contributions by category rather than simply listing the final score.
J. Misiorowski
Misiorowski was the winning pitcher and finished with a 9-3 record.
His six innings, two hits allowed, one earned run, and eight strikeouts made him the strongest starting-pitching contributor in the supplied statistics.
His four walks were the main source of baserunners, but Chicago did not turn those walks into enough scoring.
C. Rea
Rea worked five innings for Chicago and allowed one earned run.
His four strikeouts and three walks produced a solid individual pitching line, and his 54 game score was below Misiorowski’s 68.
The difference between Rea’s individual line and the overall Cubs pitching line demonstrates that Milwaukee’s larger offensive output came after the starting pitcher had completed his five innings.
S. Suzuki
Suzuki recorded the Cubs’ only home run, his 11th.
That provided Chicago with one of its two runs but did not change the larger offensive problem created by the team’s three-hit total.
W. Contreras
Contreras hit his ninth home run of the season for Milwaukee.
His long ball was one of the two Brewers homers.
G. Mitchell
Mitchell recorded his sixth home run of the season, giving Milwaukee another source of power.
D. Hamilton
Hamilton’s statistical contributions included a triple and a stolen base.
A triple combined with a stolen base illustrates how Milwaukee received production from both power and speed.
C. Pratt
Pratt recorded a double and a stolen base according to the supplied statistics.
His involvement in both extra-base hitting and baserunning is another example of Milwaukee’s varied offensive production.
C. Yelich and J. Chourio
Both Yelich and Chourio recorded doubles.
Their extra-base hits contributed to Milwaukee’s 11-hit offensive performance.
S. Frelick
Frelick was credited with one of Milwaukee’s three stolen bases.
His contribution fits into the broader pattern of the Brewers using baserunning as another method of creating pressure.
Why the Three-Hit Difference Matters
Baseball games can sometimes be decided by one or two plays, but the box score here shows a larger statistical gap.
Milwaukee had 11 hits.
Chicago had three.
That is an eight-hit difference.
Even though Chicago drew two more walks than Milwaukee, the Cubs did not produce enough hits to match the Brewers’ offensive volume.
The difference also affected how often each team could create extra-base situations. Milwaukee’s doubles and triple provided additional advancement opportunities, while Chicago’s only listed home run accounted for its primary power contribution.
Why the Seven Chicago Walks Did Not Change the Result
Seven walks can normally give an offense opportunities.
The issue is what follows those walks.
Chicago’s three hits and 0-for-4 performance with runners in scoring position indicate that the team could not consistently turn baserunners into productive scoring sequences.
This is a useful example of why on-base opportunities and scoring production are related but not identical.
The Cubs did enough to reach base, but they did not produce enough subsequent hits or successful scoring situations.
What Milwaukee Did Differently
Milwaukee’s offensive profile was more balanced.
The Brewers had five walks, 11 hits, two home runs, three doubles, one triple, and three stolen bases in the supplied game statistics.
This means the Brewers did not rely on a single offensive mechanism.
They created opportunities through contact.
They added power through home runs.
They gained extra bases through doubles and a triple.
They added pressure through stolen bases.
That variety helped Milwaukee score six runs even though the team’s RISP figure was only 2-for-15.
A Closer Look at the Pitching Numbers
The pitching statistics also reveal an important difference between limiting baserunners and limiting hits.
Milwaukee’s pitchers issued seven walks, which is not a low number.
Yet they allowed only three hits and two runs.
Chicago’s pitchers issued five walks, but allowed 11 hits and six runs.
The eight-hit difference overwhelmed the two-walk advantage Chicago had in the pitching comparison.
This is why a complete statistical review should examine multiple categories together instead of selecting one number as the entire explanation for the game.
How to Read This Box Score Correctly
Readers looking at milwaukee brewers vs chicago cubs match player stats should separate the statistics into several categories.
1. Run production
Milwaukee scored six runs compared with Chicago’s two.
2. Offensive volume
Milwaukee had 11 hits compared with Chicago’s three.
3. Power
Milwaukee hit two home runs, while Chicago hit one.
4. Starting pitching
Misiorowski worked six innings with eight strikeouts and one earned run. Rea worked five innings with four strikeouts and one earned run.
5. Baserunning
Milwaukee recorded three stolen bases.
6. Situational hitting
Milwaukee went 2-for-15 with runners in scoring position, while Chicago went 0-for-4.
7. Defensive result
Milwaukee finished without an error, while Chicago was charged with one error.
Together, these categories give a more complete understanding of the 6-2 result.
Defensive Difference
The defensive line was simple.
Chicago committed one error.
Milwaukee committed none.
The Brewers therefore finished the game without a recorded defensive error.
The one Cubs error is part of the complete box-score picture, although the supplied statistics do not specify the exact play or inning in which it occurred.
Because no detailed play description was provided, it would be inappropriate to claim that the error directly caused a particular run.
This is an important distinction when analyzing sports statistics. A team error can be relevant to the game, but its exact impact should be described only when the underlying play-by-play information confirms it.
The Importance of Context When Comparing Players
Individual baseball statistics should always be interpreted in context.
For example, Misiorowski’s four walks might look like a weakness when viewed alone. However, his two hits allowed and eight strikeouts show that he limited the quality and frequency of contact effectively enough to complete six innings with only one earned run.
Similarly, Rea’s five innings and one earned run look strong when isolated. But the complete Cubs pitching line shows that Milwaukee produced six runs against the staff overall.
The same principle applies to batting.
Suzuki’s home run was an important individual achievement, but the Cubs finished with only three total hits.
Milwaukee’s two home runs were useful, but the team’s 11-hit total provides a stronger explanation of its six-run output.
What the Matchup Teaches About Baseball Statistics
This game provides a good example of why box-score analysis should not focus only on the final score.
A 6-2 result can appear straightforward, but the underlying statistics reveal several different stories.
Chicago reached base seven times through walks and hit one home run. Milwaukee had five walks but produced 11 hits.
Milwaukee’s starting pitcher allowed four walks but surrendered only two hits.
Chicago’s starting pitcher allowed five hits but only one earned run in five innings.
The Brewers’ offense then continued to produce against the remainder of the Cubs pitching staff.
The RISP figures add another layer because Milwaukee was only 2-for-15 in those situations. That statistic shows that a team can score six runs without posting a particularly high RISP conversion rate if it creates enough opportunities through other methods.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Cubs and Brewers on June 27, 2026?
The Milwaukee Brewers defeated the Chicago Cubs 6-2 at American Family Field in Milwaukee.
Who was the winning pitcher?
- Misiorowski earned the win and improved to 9-3. He pitched six innings, allowed two hits and one earned run, walked four, and struck out eight.
Who hit home runs in the game?
- Suzuki hit his 11th home run for Chicago. W. Contreras hit his ninth home run and G. Mitchell hit his sixth home run for Milwaukee.
How many hits did each team have?
The Cubs recorded three hits, while the Brewers recorded 11 hits.
Which team had more walks?
The Cubs drew seven walks, compared with five walks for Milwaukee.
What were the teams’ records listed for the matchup?
Chicago entered with a 44-38 overall record and a 21-21 road record. Milwaukee entered with a 50-29 overall record and a 26-15 home record.
Conclusion
The milwaukee brewers vs chicago cubs match player stats from June 27, 2026, show how Milwaukee built a 6-2 victory through a combination of strong starting pitching, consistent contact, extra-base production, home-run power, and aggressive baserunning.
The Brewers finished with 11 hits compared with three for Chicago and hit two home runs compared with one. J. Misiorowski supplied six innings of two-hit, one-run pitching with eight strikeouts, while C. Rea limited Milwaukee to one earned run over five innings before the Cubs’ pitching staff surrendered additional production.
Chicago did have seven walks and a home run from S. Suzuki, but the Cubs went 0-for-4 with runners in scoring position. Milwaukee also had a low RISP conversion rate at 2-for-15, yet its 11 hits, three doubles, one triple, two home runs, and three stolen bases provided enough offensive activity to produce six runs.
The defensive numbers also favored Milwaukee, which finished without an error compared with one for Chicago.
Taken together, the box score shows that the difference was not simply one big inning or one individual performance. Milwaukee generated more hits, more extra-base production, more power, and fewer defensive mistakes while receiving a strong starting performance from Misiorowski. Those combined statistical differences explain the final 6-2 result more clearly than any single number.
