Milwaukee Bucks vs Lakers Match Player Stats

The milwaukee bucks vs lakers match player stats from November 16, 2025, tell the story of a game that was much more one-sided than the final individual scoring numbers might suggest. The Los Angeles Lakers defeated the Milwaukee Bucks 119-95 at Fiserv Forum, improving to 10-4 overall and 7-2 on the road, while Milwaukee fell to 8-6 and 5-3 at home. Luka Doncic led all scorers with 41 points, while Giannis Antetokounmpo produced 32 points and 10 rebounds for Milwaukee. The Lakers also received major contributions from Austin Reaves and Deandre Ayton, creating a balanced offensive performance that helped them build a large early advantage.

The final score does not fully explain how the game developed. Los Angeles started strongly, scoring 30 points in the first quarter and 35 in the second. Milwaukee managed only 18 and 16 points in those opening periods. By halftime, the Lakers had created a 65-34 advantage. The Bucks responded with a 38-point third quarter, but the deficit was already too large to overcome.

This breakdown looks beyond the final score and examines the player statistics, shooting efficiency, rebounding, playmaking, turnovers, quarter-by-quarter performance, plus/minus numbers, and the individual contributions that shaped the result.

Table of Contents

Milwaukee Bucks vs Lakers Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The November 16 meeting took place at Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, in front of 17,341 spectators.

Category	Lakers	Bucks
Final Score	119	95
Field Goals	38-77	32-80
Field Goal Percentage	49%	40%
Three-Pointers	13-33	15-39
Three-Point Percentage	39%	38%
Free Throws	30-33	16-24
Free Throw Percentage	91%	67%
Rebounds	47	39
Assists	23	20
Turnovers	15	17
Steals	13	6
Blocks	4	4

The most important statistical difference was shooting efficiency. Milwaukee actually made more three-pointers than Los Angeles, 15 compared with 13, but the Lakers were much more effective inside the three-point line and at the free throw line.

Los Angeles converted 38 of 77 field-goal attempts for 49 percent. Milwaukee shot 32 of 80, or 40 percent. That nine-percentage-point difference represented a substantial gap over a full game.

The free-throw numbers created another major separation. The Lakers made 30 of 33 attempts, while the Bucks made only 16 of 24. That gave Los Angeles 14 more made free throws.

Rebounding also favored the Lakers, 47 to 39. The Lakers collected eight more rebounds and combined that advantage with six more steals.

Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

The game can be understood clearly by looking at the scoring in each period.

Quarter	Lakers	Bucks	Lakers Lead
First	30	18	12
Second	35	16	19
Third	27	38	8
Fourth	27	23	24

First Quarter

Los Angeles opened the game with 30 points, while Milwaukee scored only 18.

The 12-point first-quarter difference immediately put the Bucks under pressure. A strong start from the Lakers also allowed their leading scorers to operate without needing to chase the game from behind.

The first quarter was important because the Lakers did not rely on one explosive scoring burst. They established an advantage through efficient offense and defensive activity.

Milwaukee’s 18 points represented a difficult offensive opening. The Bucks eventually found their rhythm, but the slow beginning became important when the second quarter produced an even larger Lakers advantage.

Second Quarter

The second quarter was the decisive stretch.

Los Angeles scored 35 points and held Milwaukee to just 16. The Lakers therefore won the first half 65-34.

A 31-point scoring difference across the second quarter alone explains why Milwaukee faced such a difficult second half. Even a strong comeback after halftime would have required an extraordinary turnaround.

This period also highlights why individual scoring totals should be viewed in context. Giannis Antetokounmpo eventually finished with 32 points, but Milwaukee’s team offense could not generate enough production during the first half to keep pace with Los Angeles.

Third Quarter

Milwaukee responded strongly after halftime.

The Bucks scored 38 points in the third quarter, their highest-scoring period of the game. Los Angeles scored 27.

That gave Milwaukee a 11-point advantage in the quarter and showed that the Bucks could still produce efficient offense after the halftime deficit had become substantial.

However, the third-quarter comeback did not erase the damage from the opening half. Entering the final quarter, Los Angeles still held a 92-72 advantage.

Fourth Quarter

The Lakers controlled the fourth quarter, scoring 27 points to Milwaukee’s 23.

The Bucks were unable to produce another major comeback. Los Angeles maintained its advantage and eventually finished with a 24-point victory.

The quarter-by-quarter pattern is therefore straightforward:

Lakers establish an early advantage.
Lakers dominate the second quarter.
Bucks respond after halftime.
Lakers stabilize the game and close it out.

Luka Doncic Leads the Lakers With 41 Points

Luka Doncic was the standout scorer for Los Angeles, finishing with 41 points, nine rebounds, and six assists.

His shooting line was:

41 points
9 rebounds
6 assists
9-of-19 field goals
5-of-11 three-pointers
18-of-20 free throws

Doncic’s 41 points accounted for more than one-third of the Lakers’ total 119 points.

His free-throw shooting was particularly important. He made 18 of 20 attempts from the line, giving him 18 points from free throws alone.

That efficiency helped him produce a huge scoring total despite making nine field goals.

His five made three-pointers also forced Milwaukee to respect his perimeter shooting. The combination of outside shooting, free-throw production, rebounding, and six assists made his performance much broader than a simple scoring display.

Why Doncic’s Shooting Line Matters

A 9-of-19 field-goal performance works out to roughly 47 percent from the field. He also converted five of his 11 three-point attempts.

The free throws changed the overall scoring picture. His 18-of-20 performance at the line gave him a major source of efficient points.

For readers examining player statistics, this is an important distinction. A player’s scoring total should not be considered independently of how those points were produced.

Doncic did not need to make an unusually high percentage of his field goals to reach 41 points because he combined field goals, three-pointers, and free throws effectively.

Austin Reaves Provides a Major Secondary Performance

Austin Reaves finished with 25 points, six rebounds, and eight assists.

His shooting numbers were:

25 points
6 rebounds
8 assists
9-of-17 field goals
5-of-9 three-pointers
2-of-3 free throws

Reaves’ eight assists were particularly useful because they showed his contribution was not limited to scoring.

He also shot 5-of-9 from three-point range. That gave the Lakers another reliable perimeter threat alongside Doncic.

The Lakers therefore had two players combining high scoring with playmaking responsibilities.

Doncic recorded 41 points and six assists.

Reaves recorded 25 points and eight assists.

Together, they produced 66 points and 14 assists.

That combination helps explain why Los Angeles could continue generating offense even when Milwaukee focused defensive attention on its primary scorer.

Deandre Ayton Adds Interior Production

Deandre Ayton recorded 20 points and 10 rebounds.

His shooting line was especially efficient:

20 points
10 rebounds
9-of-13 field goals
2-of-2 free throws

Ayton made nine of 13 shots from the field, which is approximately 69 percent.

His double-double was valuable because it gave the Lakers strong production in the frontcourt while Doncic and Reaves handled much of the perimeter creation.

Ayton’s 10 rebounds also contributed to Los Angeles winning the overall rebounding battle 47-39.

The Lakers therefore received strong performances from both their perimeter players and their interior scorer.

Other Lakers Player Performances

The supporting cast produced mixed individual numbers.

Jake LaRavia finished with four points, six rebounds, and one assist while shooting 1-of-10 from the field.

His scoring efficiency was poor in this particular game, but his overall contribution was not captured completely by his points total.

LaRavia recorded the Lakers’ best plus/minus at +26.

That means the Lakers outscored Milwaukee by 26 points during his time on the floor.

Bronny James finished with zero points, one rebound, and one assist on 0-of-2 shooting.

Dalton Knecht led the Lakers bench with 10 points.

The distribution shows that Los Angeles did not need every player to score heavily. The main offensive load was concentrated among Doncic, Reaves, and Ayton, while other players contributed through rebounding, defense, ball movement, or limited scoring roles.

Giannis Antetokounmpo Leads Milwaukee

Giannis Antetokounmpo led the Bucks with 32 points, 10 rebounds, and five assists.

His shooting statistics were:

32 points
10 rebounds
5 assists
9-of-15 field goals
1-of-1 three-pointers
13-of-18 free throws

Antetokounmpo shot 60 percent from the field, making nine of his 15 attempts.

He also made all 13 of his free throws.

His performance therefore combined strong scoring efficiency with double-digit rebounding and five assists.

Despite those numbers, Milwaukee could not close the team-level gap created during the first half.

This is an important lesson when interpreting match statistics. A strong individual performance can exist inside a losing team performance. The final result is influenced by the collective output of the entire rotation, not only the highest scorer.

AJ Green Provides Milwaukee’s Perimeter Scoring

AJ Green scored 15 points and made five three-pointers.

His shooting line was:

15 points
3 rebounds
5-of-10 field goals
5-of-10 three-pointers

Every made field goal listed in his statistics came from behind the three-point line.

His five successful three-pointers helped Milwaukee finish with 15 total three-pointers, compared with 13 for Los Angeles.

This is one of the more interesting statistical details from the game.

The Bucks won the three-point makes category, but still lost by 24 points.

That shows that three-point volume alone did not determine the result.

Ryan Rollins Contributes 10 Points

Ryan Rollins finished with 10 points, one rebound, and three assists.

He shot 4-of-11 from the field.

His contribution provided additional scoring outside Milwaukee’s two leading individual performers.

However, the Bucks needed more consistent production across the lineup, particularly during the opening half.

Myles Turner and Kyle Kuzma

Myles Turner recorded three points, eight rebounds, and one assist on 1-of-4 shooting.

His eight rebounds were useful, especially considering Milwaukee finished with 39 total rebounds.

Kyle Kuzma had a difficult offensive night, finishing with one point and one rebound while going 0-of-6 from the field.

The contrast between individual performances was significant.

Antetokounmpo produced 32 points.

Green added 15.

Rollins added 10.

But Kuzma’s one point and Turner’s three points meant Milwaukee received limited offensive production from several other players.

Shooting Efficiency Decided More Than Three-Point Volume

One of the clearest findings in the game data is that the Lakers did not win because they made more three-pointers.

They did not.

Milwaukee made 15 three-pointers compared with 13 for Los Angeles.

The difference came from the broader shooting profile.

Los Angeles:

38-of-77 overall
49 percent field goal shooting
13-of-33 from three
39 percent from three
30-of-33 free throws
91 percent from the line

Milwaukee:

32-of-80 overall
40 percent field goal shooting
15-of-39 from three
38 percent from three
16-of-24 free throws
67 percent from the line

The Lakers made six more field goals overall despite attempting three fewer shots.

That is a major efficiency difference.

They also made 14 more free throws.

Therefore, looking only at three-point statistics would provide an incomplete explanation of the game.

Rebounding Gave the Lakers Additional Possessions

Los Angeles collected 47 rebounds compared with Milwaukee’s 39.

The eight-rebound difference matters because rebounds can create additional opportunities while limiting second-chance opportunities for the opponent.

Ayton contributed 10 rebounds.

Doncic added nine.

The Lakers therefore received 19 rebounds from two of their most important offensive players.

Milwaukee’s leading rebounder was Antetokounmpo with 10, while Turner added eight.

The Lakers still finished with an eight-rebound team advantage.

This helped support their control of the game, particularly when combined with their better field-goal efficiency.

Turnovers and Defensive Activity

Turnovers were another area where Los Angeles had an advantage.

The Lakers committed 15 turnovers.

The Bucks committed 17.

That two-turnover difference is not enormous by itself, but it worked alongside the Lakers’ 13 steals compared with six for Milwaukee.

Los Angeles recorded seven more steals.

The Lakers also finished with four blocks, matching Milwaukee’s four.

The defensive statistics therefore show a broader pattern:

Lakers steals: 13
Bucks steals: 6
Lakers blocks: 4
Bucks blocks: 4
Lakers turnovers: 15
Bucks turnovers: 17

The biggest defensive separation came from steals.

The Free-Throw Gap Was Significant

Free throws were one of the clearest statistical separators.

Los Angeles attempted 33 free throws and made 30.

Milwaukee attempted 24 and made 16.

The Lakers therefore scored 14 more points at the free-throw line.

Their 91 percent accuracy was also substantially higher than Milwaukee’s 67 percent.

Doncic was responsible for 18 Lakers free-throw makes by himself.

Antetokounmpo made 13 for Milwaukee.

Both stars therefore generated significant free-throw production, but Doncic’s total was five points higher.

When the final margin was 24 points, those additional free-throw points became especially relevant.

Plus/Minus Adds Context to the Box Score

Traditional box-score statistics do not always explain which lineups controlled the game.

Plus/minus provides another piece of information.

Jake LaRavia recorded the Lakers’ best plus/minus at +26.

On Milwaukee’s side, Gary Trent Jr. recorded the lowest listed plus/minus at -27.

These numbers should be interpreted carefully.

Plus/minus measures the team’s point differential while a player is on the court. It does not independently measure a player’s complete performance.

For example, LaRavia scored only four points but finished at +26.

That does not mean he was the Lakers’ leading offensive player. It indicates that Los Angeles had a strong point differential during his minutes.

Similarly, a negative plus/minus does not automatically explain why a team lost. It is most useful when viewed alongside shooting, rebounding, assists, turnovers, defensive plays, and lineup context.

Lakers Offensive Balance Was a Major Factor

The Lakers’ offensive distribution was one of the defining features of the game.

Three players reached at least 20 points:

Luka Doncic: 41
Austin Reaves: 25
Deandre Ayton: 20

Together, they scored 86 of Los Angeles’ 119 points.

That is roughly 72 percent of the team’s total scoring.

At the same time, the Lakers received 10 points from Dalton Knecht and additional contributions from other players.

This structure gave Los Angeles multiple scoring options.

Milwaukee also had a clear primary scorer in Antetokounmpo, but the supporting production did not match the combined output of Los Angeles’ top three scorers.

Comparing the Two Leading Stars

The most obvious individual comparison is Doncic versus Antetokounmpo.

Statistic	Luka Doncic	Giannis Antetokounmpo
Points	41	32
Rebounds	9	10
Assists	6	5
FG	9-19	9-15
3PT	5-11	1-1
FT	18-20	13-18

The numbers show two different scoring profiles.

Doncic generated 41 points with significant perimeter and free-throw production.

Antetokounmpo scored 32 points with efficient field-goal shooting and strong free-throw production.

Antetokounmpo had one more rebound.

Doncic had one more assist.

The biggest statistical difference was scoring, with Doncic finishing nine points ahead.

The game also demonstrates why individual star statistics should be connected to team context. Both players posted major numbers, but Los Angeles received more complementary production from its supporting players.

Comparing the Backcourt and Perimeter Production

Los Angeles received substantial perimeter scoring from Doncic and Reaves.

Doncic made five three-pointers.

Reaves also made five.

Together, they accounted for 10 of the Lakers’ 13 made three-pointers.

Milwaukee’s three-point scoring was more distributed.

AJ Green made five.

Antetokounmpo made one.

The Bucks finished with 15 made threes overall.

The interesting point is that Milwaukee’s higher three-point total did not translate into a closer game because Los Angeles created advantages elsewhere.

What the Team Statistics Reveal

Several statistical themes stand out from the game.

1. Field-goal efficiency favored Los Angeles

The Lakers shot 49 percent.

The Bucks shot 40 percent.

2. Free throws strongly favored Los Angeles

The Lakers made 30.

The Bucks made 16.

3. Rebounding favored Los Angeles

The Lakers collected 47.

The Bucks collected 39.

4. Defensive activity favored Los Angeles

The Lakers recorded 13 steals compared with six for Milwaukee.

5. Milwaukee actually made more three-pointers

The Bucks made 15.

The Lakers made 13.

This prevented the game from being a simple story about superior perimeter shooting.

Why Milwaukee’s Third Quarter Was Not Enough

Milwaukee’s 38-point third quarter was the strongest offensive period by either team.

The problem was the size of the halftime deficit.

At halftime:

Lakers 65, Bucks 34.

After the third quarter:

Lakers 92, Bucks 72.

Milwaukee reduced the gap by 11 points in the third quarter, but still entered the fourth quarter down 20.

A comeback from that position requires another sustained scoring advantage.

The Lakers prevented that from happening.

This is why quarter-by-quarter data is important. Looking only at the final score could make the game appear consistently competitive, but the scoring pattern shows that Los Angeles controlled the first half and Milwaukee’s comeback came too late.

What the Player Statistics Say About the Lakers

The Lakers’ numbers suggest a team performance built around several complementary strengths.

Doncic provided elite scoring and playmaking.

Reaves supplied scoring and eight assists.

Ayton gave the team efficient interior scoring and 10 rebounds.

The team also produced 13 steals and won the overall rebounding battle.

The Lakers did not need to dominate every statistical category.

Instead, they created advantages in several areas at the same time.

Their 49 percent field-goal shooting, 91 percent free-throw shooting, 47 rebounds, and 13 steals created a statistical profile that supported a large margin.

What the Player Statistics Say About the Bucks

Milwaukee’s numbers show that the team had individual production but struggled to translate it into an effective full-game performance.

Antetokounmpo had 32 points and 10 rebounds.

Green made five three-pointers.

Rollins scored 10 points.

The Bucks also made 15 three-pointers as a team.

However, the team shot only 40 percent overall and 67 percent from the free-throw line.

The first-half scoring total of 34 points was particularly damaging.

Milwaukee’s 38-point third quarter demonstrated that the offense could recover, but the game had already moved too far in Los Angeles’ favor.

A Statistical View of the 24-Point Margin

The final margin was 24 points.

Several differences contributed to that margin:

14 more Lakers free throws made
8 more Lakers rebounds
7 more Lakers steals
6 more Lakers field goals made
6 more Lakers overall shooting percentage points
2 fewer Lakers turnovers

These categories overlap in their effects, so they should not simply be added together to explain the margin.

Instead, they show that Los Angeles created advantages across multiple areas.

The game was not decided by a single statistic.

It was the combination of shooting efficiency, free throws, rebounding, defensive activity, and early scoring.

Key Player Stats at a Glance

For readers who want the most important numbers without going through the entire box score, these were the major individual performances.

Lakers

Luka Doncic: 41 points, 9 rebounds, 6 assists, 9-of-19 shooting, 5-of-11 from three, 18-of-20 free throws.

Austin Reaves: 25 points, 6 rebounds, 8 assists, 9-of-17 shooting, 5-of-9 from three.

Deandre Ayton: 20 points, 10 rebounds, 9-of-13 shooting, 2-of-2 free throws.

Dalton Knecht: 10 points off the bench.

Jake LaRavia: 4 points, 6 rebounds, 1 assist, +26 plus/minus.

Bronny James: 0 points, 1 rebound, 1 assist.

Bucks

Giannis Antetokounmpo: 32 points, 10 rebounds, 5 assists, 9-of-15 shooting, 1-of-1 from three, 13-of-18 free throws.

AJ Green: 15 points, 3 rebounds, 5-of-10 shooting, 5-of-10 from three.

Ryan Rollins: 10 points, 1 rebound, 3 assists.

Myles Turner: 3 points, 8 rebounds, 1 assist.

Kyle Kuzma: 1 point, 1 rebound, 0-of-6 shooting.

Season Matchup Context

The matchup record shown in the provided data lists Los Angeles as leading the season series 1-0 after the November 16 meeting.

The previous listed matchup was the Lakers’ 119-95 victory over the Bucks on November 16, 2025.

The next listed matchup was Milwaukee’s 105-101 victory over Los Angeles on January 10, 2026.

That means the two listed games produced different results, making the individual and team statistics from each meeting important when examining the broader matchup.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who led the Lakers in scoring against the Bucks?

Luka Doncic led the Lakers with 41 points. He also recorded nine rebounds and six assists.

Who led the Bucks in scoring against the Lakers?

Giannis Antetokounmpo led Milwaukee with 32 points, 10 rebounds, and five assists.

What was the final score between the Lakers and Bucks on November 16, 2025?

The Lakers defeated the Bucks 119-95 at Fiserv Forum in Milwaukee.

How many three-pointers did the Lakers and Bucks make?

The Lakers made 13 three-pointers on 33 attempts, while the Bucks made 15 on 39 attempts.

Which team had more rebounds?

The Lakers had 47 rebounds, compared with 39 for Milwaukee.

Which Lakers player had the best plus/minus?

Jake LaRavia recorded the Lakers’ best listed plus/minus at +26.

Conclusion

The November 16, 2025 meeting between Los Angeles and Milwaukee produced a clear statistical profile. The Lakers won 119-95 after establishing a large advantage during the first half, particularly in the second quarter.

Luka Doncic led all scorers with 41 points and added nine rebounds and six assists. Austin Reaves contributed 25 points and eight assists, while Deandre Ayton recorded 20 points and 10 rebounds. Together, the three gave Los Angeles a strong combination of perimeter scoring, playmaking, and interior production.

Giannis Antetokounmpo remained Milwaukee’s leading individual performer with 32 points, 10 rebounds, and five assists. AJ Green added 15 points and five three-pointers, while Ryan Rollins reached double figures with 10 points.

The team statistics provide additional context. Los Angeles shot 49 percent from the field compared with Milwaukee’s 40 percent, made 30 of 33 free throws compared with 16 of 24 for the Bucks, and won the rebounding battle 47-39. The Lakers also recorded 13 steals against six for Milwaukee.

Milwaukee’s 38-point third quarter showed a strong response after halftime, but the Lakers’ 31-point halftime advantage was too large to erase. The game ultimately illustrates how several moderate statistical advantages can combine into a decisive result.

The most useful way to understand the matchup is therefore not to focus on the scoring of one player alone. The complete box score shows how shooting efficiency, free-throw accuracy, rebounding, defensive activity, turnovers, and supporting production worked together to produce the 24-point difference.