New England Patriots vs New York Giants Match Player Stats
The new england patriots vs new york giants match player stats from December 2, 2025, tell a much clearer story than the 33-15 final score alone. The New England Patriots defeated the New York Giants 33-15, but the most useful part of the box score is understanding how individual performances, efficiency, turnovers, field position, and special teams combined to create that result. Drake Maye led the Patriots with 282 passing yards and two touchdowns, while Jaxson Dart finished with 139 passing yards and one touchdown for New York. Devin Singletary supplied the Giants’ leading rushing performance with 68 yards and a touchdown, while TreVeyon Henderson led New England with 67 rushing yards.
This breakdown examines the new england patriots vs new york giants match player stats in detail, focusing on what the numbers actually reveal about the game. Rather than simply repeating the box score, the goal is to connect the passing, rushing, receiving, kicking, return, and defensive numbers to the way the game unfolded.
New England Patriots vs New York Giants Match Player Stats at a Glance
The Patriots entered the matchup with an 11-2 record and a 5-2 home record, while the Giants were 2-11 and 0-8 away. The final score reflected that difference in overall team performance.
| Category | New York Giants | New England Patriots |
| Final Score | 15 | 33 |
| Passing | 17/24, 139 yards, 1 TD, 0 INT | 24/31, 282 yards, 2 TD, 0 INT |
| Sacks Taken | 2 | 3 |
| Rushing | 27 carries, 111 yards, 1 TD | 29 carries, 119 yards, 0 TD |
| Receptions | 17, 139 yards, 1 TD | 24, 282 yards, 2 TD |
| Team Sacks | 3 | 2 |
| Tackles | 72 | 65 |
| Tackles for Loss | 5 | 5 |
| QB Hits | 5 | 7 |
| Passes Defended | 4 | 7 |
| Turnovers | 1 lost fumble | 0 |
| Punt Return TDs | 0 | 1 |
The biggest statistical difference is obvious. New England produced 282 passing yards compared with 139 for New York. That 143-yard advantage through the air gave the Patriots considerably more offensive production even though both teams were relatively close on the ground.
How the Final Score Was Built
A 33-15 result can sometimes suggest that one team dominated every statistical category. That was not exactly the case here.
The Giants rushed for 111 yards on 27 attempts, while the Patriots produced 119 yards on 29 attempts. That is only an eight-yard difference.
The real separation came through the passing game and special teams.
New England’s offense generated 282 passing yards, twice the Giants’ 139 yards. The Patriots also received a major contribution from Marcus Jones, who returned a punt 94 yards for a touchdown.
That return alone created seven points without requiring the offense to move the ball down the field.
The Giants also committed a lost fumble. Although the provided data does not specify the exact scoring sequence resulting from that turnover, giving the opponent an additional possession is particularly costly when playing a team that is already producing more efficiently through the air.
This is one of the most important lessons from these new england patriots vs new york giants match player stats. The final score was not simply the result of rushing yards. It was driven by passing efficiency, scoring opportunities, field position, and a decisive special teams play.
Drake Maye’s Passing Performance
Drake Maye was the most productive offensive player in the matchup based on the supplied passing statistics.
He completed 24 of 31 attempts for 282 yards, with two touchdowns and no interceptions.
That gives him a completion rate of approximately 77.4 percent.
His 282 passing yards also represented a major advantage over Jaxson Dart’s 139 yards.
Drake Maye Passing Breakdown
| Statistic | Drake Maye |
| Completions | 24 |
| Attempts | 31 |
| Completion Rate | 77.4% |
| Passing Yards | 282 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 3 |
The combination of accuracy and volume stands out.
Maye attempted only 31 passes, but completed 24 of them. That means New England was not relying on an unusually high number of attempts to accumulate its passing production.
His average passing yards per attempt was approximately 9.1 yards based on the supplied statistics.
That is a strong figure and helps explain why New England’s passing attack generated such a large statistical advantage.
The absence of an interception is also important. New England’s quarterback gave the Giants no interception-based possession opportunity while still throwing for 282 yards.
Maye did take three sacks, so the performance was not flawless. However, the overall passing output was highly effective.
Jaxson Dart’s Passing Performance
Jaxson Dart completed 17 of 24 passes for 139 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions.
His completion rate was approximately 70.8 percent.
At first glance, a completion percentage above 70 percent looks positive. The problem was the amount of yardage generated from those completions.
Jaxson Dart Passing Breakdown
| Statistic | Jaxson Dart |
| Completions | 17 |
| Attempts | 24 |
| Completion Rate | 70.8% |
| Passing Yards | 139 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 2 |
Dart’s average yards per attempt was approximately 5.8 yards.
That is substantially lower than Maye’s 9.1 yards per attempt.
This difference helps explain why the Giants could maintain reasonable completion efficiency but still struggle to keep pace on the scoreboard.
The Giants did avoid throwing an interception, which is a positive part of Dart’s performance. However, avoiding turnovers was not enough to compensate for the large passing-yardage gap.
Passing Efficiency Was the Biggest Offensive Difference
When comparing the quarterbacks directly, three numbers deserve special attention:
- Maye completed 24 passes compared with Dart’s 17.
- Maye produced 282 passing yards compared with Dart’s 139.
- Maye threw two touchdowns compared with Dart’s one.
The 143-yard passing difference was particularly significant.
The Patriots averaged approximately 9.1 yards per attempt, while the Giants averaged approximately 5.8.
This means the difference was not merely that New England threw more often. The Patriots also generated substantially more yardage from each passing attempt.
That is one of the clearest conclusions from the matchup.
Devin Singletary Led the Giants’ Rushing Attack
Devin Singletary was the Giants’ leading rusher.
He carried the ball 12 times for 68 yards and scored one touchdown.
His average was approximately 5.7 yards per carry.
Devin Singletary’s Rushing Numbers
| Statistic | Value |
| Carries | 12 |
| Rushing Yards | 68 |
| Yards per Carry | 5.7 |
| Rushing TDs | 1 |
Singletary’s performance was productive on an individual level.
The Giants as a team rushed for 111 yards on 27 attempts, which works out to approximately 4.1 yards per carry.
Singletary therefore accounted for a substantial portion of the Giants’ rushing production.
His 68 yards represented roughly 61 percent of the team’s 111 rushing yards.
That is an important detail when evaluating the Giants’ offense. The team had some success running the football, but the overall offensive output was still limited because the passing attack could not produce enough yardage.
TreVeyon Henderson Led the Patriots in Rushing
TreVeyon Henderson led New England’s rushing attack with 11 carries for 67 yards.
He averaged approximately 6.1 yards per carry.
TreVeyon Henderson’s Rushing Numbers
| Statistic | Value |
| Carries | 11 |
| Rushing Yards | 67 |
| Yards per Carry | 6.1 |
| Rushing TDs | 0 |
Henderson’s efficiency was slightly better than Singletary’s based on yards per carry.
The important difference is that New England did not need its rushing attack to carry the entire offense.
The Patriots had balance. Their rushing attack produced 119 yards, while their passing game generated 282.
That combination created 401 combined offensive yards based on the supplied passing and rushing figures.
The Giants, by comparison, produced 250 combined passing and rushing yards.
Rushing Comparison
The rushing numbers are surprisingly close.
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD |
| Devin Singletary | 12 | 68 | 5.7 | 1 |
| TreVeyon Henderson | 11 | 67 | 6.1 | 0 |
| Giants Team | 27 | 111 | 4.1 | 1 |
| Patriots Team | 29 | 119 | 4.1 | 0 |
This comparison shows why looking only at rushing statistics would give an incomplete picture of the game.
New England gained only eight more rushing yards than New York.
Yet the Patriots won by 18 points.
The major statistical separation came elsewhere.
Darius Slayton Provided the Giants’ Biggest Receiving Contribution
Darius Slayton was the Giants’ leading receiver according to the supplied statistics.
He recorded two receptions for 41 yards and one touchdown.
That means he accounted for a significant portion of the Giants’ receiving production despite making only two catches.
Darius Slayton’s Receiving Numbers
| Statistic | Value |
| Receptions | 2 |
| Receiving Yards | 41 |
| Average per Reception | 20.5 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
His 20.5 yards per reception indicates that his catches were valuable in terms of yardage.
The challenge for New York was consistency.
The Giants finished with 17 receptions for 139 yards. That works out to approximately 8.2 yards per reception across the team.
Slayton’s 41 yards represented nearly 30 percent of the Giants’ receiving yardage.
His touchdown was also the only receiving touchdown listed for New York.
Hunter Henry Led the Patriots in Receiving
Hunter Henry was the Patriots’ leading receiver with four receptions for 73 yards.
His average was approximately 18.3 yards per reception.
Hunter Henry’s Receiving Numbers
| Statistic | Value |
| Receptions | 4 |
| Receiving Yards | 73 |
| Average per Reception | 18.3 |
| Touchdowns | Not listed |
Henry’s 73 receiving yards accounted for more than a quarter of New England’s 282 receiving yards.
That production helped support Maye’s strong passing performance.
Unlike the Giants, the Patriots generated much more total passing yardage. As a result, their receiving production was spread across a much more productive passing attack.
Team Receiving Comparison
The team receiving figures are essentially the passing totals provided in the box score.
| Category | Giants | Patriots |
| Receptions | 17 | 24 |
| Receiving Yards | 139 | 282 |
| Receiving TDs | 1 | 2 |
| Average Yards per Reception | 8.2 | 11.8 |
The Patriots averaged approximately 11.8 yards per reception, compared with 8.2 for New York.
That is a difference of roughly 3.6 yards every time a reception was recorded.
Over 24 Patriots receptions, that type of efficiency can create a substantial difference in total production.
Turnovers Played an Important Role
Turnovers are often one of the easiest statistics to overlook when reading an individual player box score.
The Giants recorded one fumble that was lost.
Gunner Olszewski was credited with one fumble and one lost fumble.
The Patriots had no listed lost fumble. Elijah Ponder was credited with zero fumbles and one fumble recovery.
Neither team recorded an interception.
Turnover Summary
| Category | Giants | Patriots |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 0 |
| Interceptions Made | 0 | 0 |
| Fumbles Listed | 1 | 0 |
| Fumbles Lost | 1 | 0 |
| Fumble Recoveries | Not listed | 1 |
This created a clean turnover advantage for New England.
The Patriots protected the football while the Giants gave up one possession through a lost fumble.
In a game where New England already had a significant passing advantage, that additional possession margin made the Giants’ task even harder.
Marcus Jones Changed the Game on Special Teams
One of the most striking numbers in the entire box score belongs to Marcus Jones.
He recorded three punt returns for 124 yards and scored a 94-yard punt return touchdown.
His average was 41.3 yards per return.
That is an enormous special teams contribution.
Marcus Jones Punt Return Numbers
| Statistic | Value |
| Punt Returns | 3 |
| Return Yards | 124 |
| Average | 41.3 |
| Long Return | 94 yards |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
The 94-yard touchdown was particularly important because it gave New England seven points without requiring its offense to produce a scoring drive.
This is exactly why special teams statistics should not be treated as secondary information when analyzing an NFL game.
A single return can completely alter field position, momentum, and scoring.
Giants Kick Returns
The Giants recorded six kick returns for 142 yards.
Their average was 23.7 yards per return, with a long return of 34 yards.
Giants Kick Return Numbers
| Statistic | Value |
| Returns | 6 |
| Return Yards | 142 |
| Average | 23.7 |
| Long | 34 yards |
The Giants actually accumulated more total kick return yards than the Patriots.
However, total kick return yards do not automatically translate into points.
New England’s punt return touchdown was much more impactful because it directly added seven points to the scoreboard.
Patriots Kick Returns
The Patriots recorded three kick returns for 79 yards.
Their average was 26.3 yards per return, with a long return of 39 yards.
| Statistic | Patriots |
| Kick Returns | 3 |
| Return Yards | 79 |
| Average | 26.3 |
| Long | 39 yards |
The Patriots had fewer opportunities but averaged more yards per return.
The most important special teams number, however, remained Marcus Jones’ 94-yard punt return touchdown.
Kicking Performance
The Patriots also received a strong scoring contribution from Andy Borregales.
He converted four of five field-goal attempts and all three extra-point attempts.
That gave him 15 points.
Andy Borregales
| Statistic | Value |
| Field Goals | 4/5 |
| Extra Points | 3/3 |
| Total Points | 15 |
Fifteen points from one kicker is a major contribution.
It also means the Patriots did not need every offensive possession to end in a touchdown.
Four successful field goals provided reliable scoring opportunities.
The Giants’ Younghoe Koo converted his only extra-point attempt for one point.
Patriots Defense vs Giants Defense
The defensive numbers provide another interesting comparison.
The Giants recorded 72 total tackles, 43 solo tackles, three sacks, five tackles for loss, four passes defended, and five quarterback hits.
The Patriots recorded 65 tackles, 33 solo tackles, two sacks, five tackles for loss, seven passes defended, and seven quarterback hits.
Defensive Comparison
| Statistic | Giants | Patriots |
| Total Tackles | 72 | 65 |
| Solo Tackles | 43 | 33 |
| Sacks | 3 | 2 |
| Tackles for Loss | 5 | 5 |
| Passes Defended | 4 | 7 |
| QB Hits | 5 | 7 |
The Giants had more total tackles and more sacks.
That does not necessarily mean their defense performed better.
Tackle totals can increase when an opponent runs more plays or when defenders are forced to make more stops after allowing completions.
The Patriots had fewer total tackles but recorded more passes defended and quarterback hits.
That suggests their defensive pressure and coverage activity contributed to limiting New York’s overall offensive production.
Why the Defensive Numbers Need Context
A common mistake when reviewing box scores is to assume that the team with more tackles automatically played better defense.
That is not how defensive statistics should be interpreted.
The Giants recorded 72 tackles, compared with 65 for New England.
But the Patriots won 33-15.
The more meaningful question is what happened before those tackles were recorded.
New England’s defense limited the Giants to 139 passing yards while allowing 111 rushing yards.
The Giants therefore finished with only 250 combined passing and rushing yards based on the supplied statistics.
New England’s offense, meanwhile, generated 282 passing yards and 119 rushing yards.
That is a 151-yard difference in combined passing and rushing production.
The defensive numbers therefore make more sense when viewed alongside offensive efficiency.
Comparing Jaxson Dart and Drake Maye
The quarterback comparison is arguably the most important individual matchup in the game.
| Statistic | Jaxson Dart | Drake Maye |
| Completions | 17 | 24 |
| Attempts | 24 | 31 |
| Completion Rate | 70.8% | 77.4% |
| Passing Yards | 139 | 282 |
| Passing TDs | 1 | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 0 |
| Sacks | 2 | 3 |
| Yards per Attempt | 5.8 | 9.1 |
Maye had the advantage in every major production category except sacks taken.
Dart completed a respectable percentage of his passes and avoided interceptions, but New York’s passing attack lacked the explosive production needed to keep pace.
Maye’s 282 yards on 31 attempts were the foundation of New England’s offensive advantage.
Comparing the Leading Running Backs
Singletary and Henderson produced remarkably similar yardage totals.
Singletary had 68 yards on 12 carries.
Henderson had 67 yards on 11 carries.
That means the Patriots did not win the rushing matchup because Henderson dramatically outperformed Singletary.
Instead, both backs were productive.
The larger difference was that New England combined similar rushing production with far greater passing production.
That balance made the Patriots offense much harder to contain.
Comparing the Leading Receivers
Hunter Henry and Darius Slayton also provide an interesting comparison.
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD |
| Darius Slayton | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 1 |
| Hunter Henry | 4 | 73 | 18.3 | Not listed |
Slayton averaged more yards per reception.
Henry, however, produced more total receiving yardage because he caught twice as many passes.
This is a useful reminder that efficiency and volume are different measurements.
A player can have a higher yards-per-catch average without being the team’s most productive receiver overall.
The Role of Field Position
Field position is not always visible in a standard player-stat table, but the special teams numbers give us clues about its importance.
The Giants averaged 23.7 yards on six kick returns.
The Patriots averaged 26.3 yards on three kick returns.
More importantly, Marcus Jones averaged 41.3 yards on punt returns and produced a 94-yard touchdown.
That single play was far more valuable than a collection of ordinary returns because it directly created points.
New England also had only two punts for 54 yards, while the Giants punted four times for 199 yards.
The Giants’ Jamie Gillan averaged 49.8 yards per punt, with a long of 54.
The Patriots’ Bryce Baringer averaged 27.0 yards per punt across two punts.
These numbers should not be interpreted as a simple punting quality comparison because the number of punts and circumstances surrounding each punt matter. Still, they demonstrate that the Giants were forced into more punting situations.
Punting Comparison
| Statistic | Giants | Patriots |
| Punts | 4 | 2 |
| Punt Yards | 199 | 54 |
| Average | 49.8 | 27.0 |
| Long | 54 | 32 |
The Giants punted twice as often as New England.
That difference is meaningful.
A team that produces more sustained offensive success generally has fewer possessions ending in punts.
The Patriots’ two punts indicate that more of their drives reached situations where they could score, turn the ball over, or otherwise continue moving the offense.
What the Box Score Says About the Giants
The Giants’ statistics reveal a team that had some positive individual performances but struggled to turn them into enough overall production.
There were several encouraging elements:
- Jaxson Dart completed 70.8 percent of his passes.
- Dart did not throw an interception.
- Devin Singletary averaged 5.7 yards per carry.
- Singletary scored a rushing touchdown.
- Darius Slayton averaged 20.5 yards per reception.
- The Giants recorded three sacks.
- The Giants produced 111 rushing yards.
- Their kick return unit generated 142 yards.
But there were also clear limitations.
The passing attack generated only 139 yards.
The team lost one fumble.
The Giants punted four times.
Their opponent produced 282 passing yards.
Those factors combined to create a difficult path to victory.
What the Box Score Says About the Patriots
New England’s statistics show a more balanced and efficient performance.
The Patriots:
- Passed for 282 yards.
- Completed 24 of 31 attempts.
- Threw two touchdowns.
- Avoided interceptions.
- Rushed for 119 yards.
- Produced 401 combined passing and rushing yards.
- Lost no fumbles based on the supplied data.
- Recorded seven passes defended.
- Produced seven quarterback hits.
- Scored a punt return touchdown.
- Received 15 points from Andy Borregales.
The most impressive part is how many different areas contributed to the win.
The Patriots did not rely solely on their quarterback.
Their rushing attack was productive, their passing attack was significantly better than New York’s, their defense created pressure, and their special teams generated a touchdown.
A Closer Look at Offensive Balance
The Patriots produced 401 combined passing and rushing yards based on the supplied statistics.
Their offense generated approximately 70 percent of that production through the passing game.
The Giants produced 250 combined passing and rushing yards, with approximately 56 percent coming through the air.
The problem was not simply the Giants’ run game.
Their 111 rushing yards were respectable.
The issue was that the passing attack did not provide enough complementary production.
When a team can run for more than 100 yards but throws for only 139, the offense can become easier to defend because the opponent does not have to respect the same level of passing production.
New England had no such limitation.
The Importance of Explosive Plays
The numbers also highlight the importance of explosive plays.
Darius Slayton averaged 20.5 yards per reception.
Hunter Henry averaged 18.3.
Marcus Jones averaged 41.3 yards per punt return and had a 94-yard touchdown.
These plays can change a game quickly.
However, explosive plays become even more valuable when they are supported by consistent offensive execution.
New England combined explosive passing production with 119 rushing yards and strong field-position contributions.
That combination made its scoring output sustainable rather than dependent on one isolated play.
What Fans Should Look at Beyond the Final Score
When reviewing an NFL matchup, the final score is only the beginning.
For this game, the most informative statistics are:
- Passing yards: New England 282, New York 139.
- Passing efficiency: Maye produced approximately 9.1 yards per attempt.
- Combined yardage: New England generated 401 passing and rushing yards compared with New York’s 250.
- Turnovers: New York lost one fumble while New England did not lose one.
- Punt returns: Marcus Jones produced a 94-yard touchdown.
- Kicking: Andy Borregales scored 15 points.
- Quarterback pressure: New England recorded seven QB hits, while New York recorded five.
- Passing defense: New England recorded seven passes defended compared with four for New York.
These numbers provide a much better explanation for the 33-15 result than simply looking at total rushing yards.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the leading passer in the Patriots vs Giants game?
Drake Maye was the leading passer. He completed 24 of 31 attempts for 282 yards, two touchdowns, and no interceptions.
How many passing yards did Jaxson Dart have?
Jaxson Dart completed 17 of 24 passes for 139 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions.
Who was the Giants’ leading rusher?
Devin Singletary led New York with 12 carries for 68 yards and one rushing touchdown.
Who led the Patriots in receiving?
Hunter Henry led the Patriots in receiving with four receptions for 73 yards.
Who scored the Patriots’ punt return touchdown?
Marcus Jones returned a punt 94 yards for a touchdown. He finished with three punt returns for 124 yards.
What was the final score between the Giants and Patriots?
The New England Patriots defeated the New York Giants 33-15 on December 2, 2025.
Conclusion
The new england patriots vs new york giants match player stats show that New England’s 33-15 victory was built on much more than one statistical category.
The rushing numbers were relatively close, with the Patriots gaining 119 yards and the Giants producing 111. Devin Singletary and TreVeyon Henderson both had productive performances, but neither rushing attack alone explains the final result.
The decisive difference was the passing game.
Drake Maye completed 24 of 31 passes for 282 yards and two touchdowns without throwing an interception. Jaxson Dart completed 17 of 24 for 139 yards and one touchdown without an interception. Maye’s 143-yard advantage through the air created a substantial offensive gap.
New England also benefited from strong complementary football. Marcus Jones delivered a 94-yard punt return touchdown, Andy Borregales scored 15 points, and the Patriots defense recorded seven passes defended and seven quarterback hits.
The Giants had individual positives, including Singletary’s 68 rushing yards and touchdown, Slayton’s 41 receiving yards and touchdown, and three team sacks. But those contributions were not enough to overcome the Patriots’ superior passing production, cleaner turnover profile, and special teams impact.
Ultimately, the box score presents a straightforward picture: New England was more productive through the air, generated more total offensive yardage, protected the football better, and received significant scoring contributions from both its kicker and return game. Those combined advantages explain why the Patriots finished with a convincing 33-15 victory.
