cleveland browns vs philadelphia eagles match player stats
The cleveland browns vs philadelphia eagles match player stats from the August 16, 2025 NFL preseason game tell a much more interesting story than the final score alone. Cleveland defeated Philadelphia 22 to 13, but the numbers show that the Browns won primarily through a stronger rushing attack, more efficient passing production, and a defense that created a decisive scoring play. Philadelphia, meanwhile, struggled to move the ball consistently, especially on the ground, and finished with only 55 passing yards.
For readers looking beyond the scoreboard, this game offers a useful preseason snapshot of quarterback efficiency, rushing depth, receiving production, defensive pressure, turnovers, and field-position plays. Cleveland finished with 331 yards of total offense, while Philadelphia produced only 88 yards. That 243-yard difference was the clearest statistical indicator of how the game developed.
The game also featured two defensive interception returns for touchdowns. Cleveland’s KJ Henry returned an interception 45 yards for a touchdown, while Philadelphia’s Andrew Mukuba returned an interception 75 yards for a touchdown. Those plays helped shape a game in which offensive production was uneven but defensive impact was significant.
Cleveland Browns vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The Cleveland Browns entered the preseason matchup with a 1-0 record and improved to 2-0 after the 22 to 13 victory. Philadelphia moved to 1-1 after the loss.
The game was played on August 16, 2025, as part of the NFL preseason.
Final Score
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| Cleveland Browns | 6 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 22 |
| Philadelphia Eagles | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
The scoring pattern is important.
Cleveland scored in every quarter. Philadelphia scored all 13 of its points in the second quarter and was held scoreless in the first, third, and fourth quarters.
That second-half split provides one of the strongest clues about the game’s flow. Philadelphia had a productive stretch in the second quarter, but Cleveland controlled the scoreboard after halftime.
The Biggest Statistical Difference: Total Offense
The overall offensive numbers heavily favored Cleveland.
The Browns produced:
- 23 completions on 31 passing attempts
- 199 passing yards
- 132 rushing yards
- 331 total offensive yards
- 4.6 yards per rushing attempt
- 6.9 yards per passing attempt
- One rushing touchdown
- One interception thrown
Philadelphia produced:
- 13 completions on 24 passing attempts
- 55 passing yards
- 33 rushing yards
- 88 total offensive yards
- 1.7 yards per rushing attempt
- 2.7 yards per passing attempt
- One passing touchdown
- One interception thrown
The 331 to 88 total-yard difference is substantial.
Cleveland gained nearly four times as many yards as Philadelphia. The Browns also averaged almost three yards more per rushing attempt and more than four yards more per passing attempt.
This was not simply a case of one or two explosive plays deciding everything. Cleveland’s offense consistently produced more yardage across the major categories.
Cleveland’s Passing Performance
Cleveland completed 23 of 31 passes for 199 yards. The team averaged 6.9 yards per attempt and finished with a 79.2 passer rating.
The Browns did not throw a touchdown pass, and they did throw one interception. Their quarterbacks were also sacked three times for a combined loss of 15 yards.
Those numbers show a passing attack that was productive in volume but not flawless.
The completion rate was approximately 74.2 percent, which indicates solid accuracy across the team’s passing attempts. At the same time, the absence of a passing touchdown and the interception kept the passing performance from being dominant.
The most useful way to evaluate the passing numbers is in combination with Cleveland’s rushing production. The Browns did not need their quarterbacks to carry the entire offense because the running game consistently created yardage.
Dillon Gabriel’s Passing Stats
Dillon Gabriel led Cleveland in passing attempts and completions.
His line was:
| Statistic | Dillon Gabriel |
| Completions | 13 |
| Attempts | 18 |
| Completion Rate | 72.2% |
| Passing Yards | 143 |
| Yards per Attempt | 7.9 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Sack Yards | 11 |
| Passer Rating | 72.2 |
Gabriel completed 13 of 18 attempts, giving him a 72.2 percent completion rate. His 143 passing yards represented the majority of Cleveland’s passing production.
His 7.9 yards per attempt also stood out. That figure was higher than Cleveland’s overall team average of 6.9 because the other quarterback’s numbers were less productive on a per-attempt basis.
However, Gabriel’s performance included one interception and two sacks. That means the raw yardage should not be viewed in isolation.
The positive takeaway is efficiency and accuracy. The concern is turnover and pressure management.
In a preseason setting, those are exactly the types of details that can matter when evaluating quarterback play beyond the final score.
Tyler Huntley’s Passing Stats
Tyler Huntley completed 10 of 13 attempts for 71 yards.
His numbers were:
| Statistic | Tyler Huntley |
| Completions | 10 |
| Attempts | 13 |
| Completion Rate | 76.9% |
| Passing Yards | 71 |
| Yards per Attempt | 5.5 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Sack Yards | 4 |
| Passer Rating | 88.9 |
Huntley’s completion percentage was higher than Gabriel’s, and he avoided an interception.
His 88.9 passer rating was also higher than Gabriel’s 72.2 rating.
The tradeoff was yardage efficiency. Huntley averaged 5.5 yards per attempt compared with Gabriel’s 7.9.
That creates an interesting contrast. Gabriel generated more downfield production, while Huntley was more efficient in avoiding mistakes and completing a higher percentage of his attempts.
For preseason analysis, both characteristics can be meaningful.
Cleveland’s Rushing Attack Was a Major Advantage
The Browns rushed 29 times for 132 yards, averaging 4.6 yards per carry.
That was one of the most important statistical differences in the game.
Philadelphia rushed only 19 times for 33 yards, averaging 1.7 yards per carry.
The Browns therefore had a 99-yard advantage on the ground.
Cleveland also recorded the longest rushing play of the game at 54 yards.
That explosive run had a major effect on the overall rushing numbers. It demonstrates why total rushing yards should always be examined alongside long plays and average production.
Pierre Strong Jr. Leads Cleveland’s Rushing Numbers
Pierre Strong Jr. was Cleveland’s leading rusher.
His statistics were:
| Statistic | Pierre Strong Jr. |
| Carries | 13 |
| Rushing Yards | 89 |
| Average | 6.8 yards |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Long Run | 54 yards |
Strong accounted for 89 of Cleveland’s 132 rushing yards.
That means he produced roughly two-thirds of the team’s rushing yardage despite not scoring a rushing touchdown.
His 6.8 yards per carry was also well above Cleveland’s overall 4.6 average.
The 54-yard run is particularly important when interpreting his performance. It accounted for a large portion of his total yardage, so the most balanced assessment is that Strong produced an explosive play while also carrying a significant workload.
His performance was one of the clearest individual statistical highlights of the game.
Cleveland’s Receiving Production
The Browns recorded 23 receptions for 214 receiving yards.
They averaged 9.3 yards per reception and had a longest reception of 29 yards.
No Cleveland receiver recorded a touchdown.
Kaden Davis led the team in receiving production based on the supplied box score, recording:
- 3 receptions
- 44 receiving yards
- 14.7 yards per reception
- 29-yard long reception
- 0 touchdowns
Davis’s 44 yards represented a team-high in receiving yardage.
The receiving numbers also help explain why Cleveland was able to produce 199 passing yards despite not recording a passing touchdown. The offense distributed its production through completions rather than relying on one major scoring reception.
Philadelphia’s Passing Numbers
Philadelphia’s passing offense was considerably less productive.
The Eagles completed 13 of 24 passes for only 55 yards.
They averaged 2.7 yards per attempt and finished with a 52.1 passer rating.
Philadelphia recorded one passing touchdown and one interception.
The Eagles were also sacked once for nine yards.
The 55 passing yards are especially striking when compared with Cleveland’s 199.
Philadelphia attempted 24 passes, only seven fewer than Cleveland, but produced 144 fewer passing yards.
That means the issue was not simply a lack of passing volume. The larger problem was passing efficiency and the inability to generate meaningful yardage from those attempts.
Kyle McCord’s Passing Stats
Kyle McCord completed 8 of 16 passes for 47 yards.
His statistical line:
| Statistic | Kyle McCord |
| Completions | 8 |
| Attempts | 16 |
| Completion Rate | 50.0% |
| Passing Yards | 47 |
| Yards per Attempt | 2.9 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 0 |
| Passer Rating | 77.1 |
McCord accounted for the majority of Philadelphia’s passing yardage.
His 47 yards were produced without throwing an interception, and he recorded the team’s passing touchdown.
However, his 2.9 yards per attempt show how limited the passing offense was in terms of yardage generation.
A quarterback can produce a touchdown and still have a statistically modest overall game. That is what happened here.
Dorian Thompson-Robinson’s Passing Stats
Dorian Thompson-Robinson completed 5 of 8 passes for 17 yards.
His numbers were:
| Statistic | Dorian Thompson-Robinson |
| Completions | 5 |
| Attempts | 8 |
| Completion Rate | 62.5% |
| Passing Yards | 17 |
| Yards per Attempt | 2.1 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Sack Yards | 9 |
| Passer Rating | 27.1 |
The 17 passing yards were limited, and the interception further reduced the efficiency of the performance.
The 27.1 passer rating was the lowest among the quarterbacks listed in the game data.
Again, preseason statistics require context, particularly because playing time, personnel combinations, and game circumstances can vary. Still, the numbers clearly show that Philadelphia’s passing game struggled to generate yardage during this matchup.
Philadelphia’s Running Game Struggled Even More
Philadelphia finished with 19 rushing attempts for only 33 yards.
The Eagles averaged 1.7 yards per carry and had a longest run of only eight yards.
That is a significant weakness compared with Cleveland’s 132 rushing yards.
The difference between the two teams was 99 rushing yards.
Philadelphia also failed to record a rushing touchdown.
Montrell Johnson Jr. Leads Philadelphia’s Rushing
Montrell Johnson Jr. led Philadelphia with:
- 6 carries
- 20 yards
- 3.3 yards per carry
- 0 touchdowns
- 6-yard long run
Johnson accounted for 20 of Philadelphia’s 33 rushing yards.
His 3.3 yards per carry was better than the team average of 1.7, but the overall ground attack still lacked explosive production.
Philadelphia’s longest run was only eight yards, which shows that the Eagles struggled to create big gains on the ground.
This is one of the clearest areas where the team fell behind Cleveland statistically.
Philadelphia’s Receiving Production
The Eagles recorded 13 receptions for 64 yards.
They averaged 4.9 yards per reception and had a longest reception of 12 yards.
Philadelphia’s receiving leader was Ainias Smith.
His line was:
| Statistic | Ainias Smith |
| Receptions | 2 |
| Receiving Yards | 19 |
| Average | 9.5 yards |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Long Reception | 10 yards |
Smith’s touchdown was one of Philadelphia’s offensive highlights.
However, the team’s overall 64 receiving yards show how difficult it was for the Eagles to consistently create yardage through the air.
Cleveland’s defense did not simply prevent touchdowns. It limited Philadelphia’s ability to string together productive plays.
Defensive Plays Changed the Game
The defensive statistics provide another important layer to the cleveland browns vs philadelphia eagles match player stats.
Cleveland’s defense recorded:
- 50 tackles
- 31 solo tackles
- 1 sack
- 6 tackles for loss
- 5 passes defended
- 6 quarterback hits
- 1 defensive touchdown
Philadelphia’s defense recorded:
- 72 tackles
- 49 solo tackles
- 3 sacks
- 6 tackles for loss
- 4 passes defended
- 4 quarterback hits
- 1 defensive touchdown
Philadelphia recorded more total tackles and sacks, but that did not translate into a better defensive result.
This is an important lesson when reading defensive box scores.
More tackles do not automatically mean better defensive performance.
A defense may record a high number of tackles because it is on the field frequently or because opponents are successfully completing plays. More useful indicators often include turnovers, explosive plays allowed, points surrendered, tackles for loss, quarterback pressure, and scoring efficiency.
KJ Henry’s Defensive Touchdown
KJ Henry produced one of Cleveland’s most important individual defensive plays.
He recorded an interception and returned it 45 yards for a touchdown.
That single play converted a defensive takeaway into seven points and significantly affected the scoring margin.
It also demonstrates why interception totals alone do not tell the complete story.
An interception that ends a drive is valuable.
An interception returned for a touchdown is even more impactful because it simultaneously stops the opponent and directly adds points.
Henry’s 45-yard return therefore deserves special attention in any detailed review of the game.
Andrew Mukuba Answers With a 75-Yard Return
Philadelphia also generated a defensive touchdown.
Andrew Mukuba intercepted a pass and returned it 75 yards for a touchdown.
His return was 30 yards longer than Henry’s.
That was Philadelphia’s biggest individual defensive scoring play in the game.
The two defensive touchdowns created an unusual statistical balance.
Both teams had one interception return for a touchdown.
Both teams also finished with one defensive touchdown.
The difference came from offensive production.
Cleveland’s offense generated enough yardage to maintain control, while Philadelphia’s offense struggled to sustain drives.
Comparing the Quarterbacks
The quarterback comparison is one of the most searched aspects of the cleveland browns vs philadelphia eagles match player stats, but the numbers should be read carefully.
| Quarterback | Comp/Att | Yards | YPA | TD | INT | Rating |
| Dillon Gabriel | 13/18 | 143 | 7.9 | 0 | 1 | 72.2 |
| Tyler Huntley | 10/13 | 71 | 5.5 | 0 | 0 | 88.9 |
| Kyle McCord | 8/16 | 47 | 2.9 | 1 | 0 | 77.1 |
| Dorian Thompson-Robinson | 5/8 | 17 | 2.1 | 0 | 1 | 27.1 |
Gabriel led all quarterbacks in passing yardage.
Huntley posted the highest passer rating among the four quarterbacks listed.
McCord was the only quarterback to throw a passing touchdown.
Thompson-Robinson had the lowest passer rating and threw one interception.
This comparison illustrates why quarterback evaluation cannot rely on one statistic.
Gabriel’s 143 yards show strong production, but the interception and sacks affected his overall rating.
Huntley’s 88.9 rating reflects efficient execution with no interceptions, although his 71 yards and 5.5 yards per attempt indicate a more conservative statistical output.
McCord’s touchdown helped his line, but his 2.9 yards per attempt reflected Philadelphia’s broader offensive struggles.
Cleveland’s Offensive Efficiency Was the Defining Difference
The most revealing numbers can be summarized in a simple comparison.
| Category | Cleveland | Philadelphia |
| Passing Yards | 199 | 55 |
| Rushing Yards | 132 | 33 |
| Total Offensive Yards | 331 | 88 |
| Passing TDs | 0 | 1 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 1 | 1 |
| Rushing TDs | 1 | 0 |
| Rushing Average | 4.6 | 1.7 |
| Passing Average | 6.9 | 2.7 |
| Sacks Allowed | 3 | 1 |
Philadelphia had a few defensive advantages, particularly in sacks.
But Cleveland won the offensive yardage battle by a huge margin.
The Browns generated 243 more total yards.
They gained 144 more passing yards.
They gained 99 more rushing yards.
They also averaged 2.9 more yards per rushing attempt and 4.2 more yards per passing attempt.
Those differences explain the final result much better than the raw score alone.
Why the Second Quarter Matters
Philadelphia scored all 13 of its points in the second quarter.
That is significant because it shows the Eagles had a stretch where they were able to convert opportunities into points.
However, they were unable to maintain that production.
Cleveland scored six points in the first quarter, six in the second, seven in the third, and three in the fourth.
That distribution indicates consistent scoring throughout the game.
Philadelphia’s scoring pattern was much more concentrated.
For analysts, this is an important distinction.
A team that scores in multiple quarters demonstrates a different type of offensive consistency from a team that produces one strong scoring period but goes quiet afterward.
Turnovers and Defensive Scoring
Each team recorded one interception.
Each team also had a defensive touchdown.
However, the offensive impact of those turnovers was not identical.
Cleveland’s interception became a 45-yard touchdown return.
Philadelphia’s interception became a 75-yard touchdown return.
The two defensive scores essentially canceled each other in the scoring comparison.
That means the decisive statistical advantage came from what the offenses did after accounting for those defensive touchdowns.
Cleveland’s offense produced 331 yards.
Philadelphia’s offense produced only 88.
This is perhaps the most important analytical takeaway from the game.
The final score was not driven solely by defensive mistakes. Cleveland created a substantial offensive production advantage as well.
What the Rushing Numbers Tell Us
Rushing statistics often reveal the physical side of a football game more clearly than passing totals.
Cleveland’s 132 rushing yards on 29 attempts produced a 4.6-yard average.
Philadelphia’s 33 rushing yards on 19 attempts produced a 1.7-yard average.
The Browns therefore had both more volume and better efficiency.
The difference of 99 rushing yards meant Cleveland had considerably more success creating positive yardage on the ground.
Pierre Strong Jr.’s 89 yards were central to that advantage.
Philadelphia’s leading rusher, Montrell Johnson Jr., produced 20 yards.
Strong alone therefore had 69 more rushing yards than Philadelphia’s leading individual rusher.
That is an enormous difference in a single preseason matchup.
What the Passing Numbers Tell Us
The passing comparison is equally clear.
Cleveland threw for 199 yards.
Philadelphia threw for 55.
The Browns averaged 6.9 yards per attempt.
The Eagles averaged only 2.7.
The 4.2-yard gap per passing attempt is substantial.
Philadelphia did manage one passing touchdown, but the low yardage total suggests the Eagles had difficulty sustaining meaningful passing production.
Cleveland, meanwhile, moved the ball more effectively even without a passing touchdown.
That distinction matters because touchdowns are only one part of offensive efficiency.
A team can produce strong passing yardage without throwing a touchdown if its running game or defense contributes points.
That is essentially what happened to Cleveland.
A Deeper Look at the Defensive Comparison
Philadelphia recorded three sacks compared with Cleveland’s one.
On the surface, that gives the Eagles an advantage in quarterback pressure.
Philadelphia also recorded 72 total tackles compared with Cleveland’s 50.
But Cleveland produced six quarterback hits despite having fewer sacks.
The Browns also recorded five passes defended compared with Philadelphia’s four.
Both teams had six tackles for loss.
Both defenses created one interception return touchdown.
The defensive comparison therefore does not show a simple winner in every category.
Instead, it shows two defenses that made splash plays while their offenses produced very different results.
That distinction is especially important for preseason evaluation.
A team can lose the sack battle while still winning the game because it controls other parts of the matchup.
Why Total Yardage Should Not Be Ignored
Modern football analysis often focuses heavily on turnovers, explosive plays, quarterback ratings, and individual stars.
Those metrics are useful, but total yardage still provides valuable context.
Cleveland’s 331 yards compared with Philadelphia’s 88 is too large a difference to ignore.
The Browns generated more yardage through both the air and on the ground.
They also produced a 54-yard run.
Philadelphia’s longest rush was only eight yards.
The Eagles’ longest reception was 12 yards, while Cleveland’s longest reception was 29 yards.
Those explosive-play differences helped explain why Cleveland repeatedly created more opportunities to move the football.
The Importance of Explosive Plays
Cleveland’s longest rushing play was 54 yards.
Its longest reception was 29 yards.
Philadelphia’s longest rushing play was eight yards.
Its longest reception was 12 yards.
That creates a major difference in offensive potential.
Explosive plays can change field position quickly and force defenses to respond differently.
The Browns were able to generate explosive gains on the ground and through the passing game.
Philadelphia did not match that level of big-play production.
Even without a large number of touchdowns from the offense, Cleveland’s ability to generate longer gains helped produce its 331-yard total.
Special Teams and Field Position
Cleveland also recorded three kickoff returns for 98 yards.
The team averaged 32.7 yards per return.
Kaden Davis recorded two kickoff returns for 60 yards.
Trayveon Williams recorded one return for 38 yards.
These numbers add another layer to the game.
Good return production can improve field position and reduce the distance an offense must travel to score.
While the supplied data does not provide a complete field-position breakdown for every drive, Cleveland’s 32.7-yard kickoff return average indicates that the Browns had opportunities to begin possessions with strong starting field position.
Fumbles and Ball Security
Cleveland recorded one fumble and lost it.
Philadelphia recorded no fumbles and lost none.
This gives Philadelphia a clear advantage in fumble security.
Yet the Eagles still lost the game by nine points.
That reinforces a broader point about football statistics.
Ball security matters, but it is only one part of the overall performance.
Philadelphia avoided a lost fumble, but its offense generated only 88 total yards.
Cleveland had one lost fumble but still produced 331 yards.
The difference in offensive production was large enough to outweigh the Eagles’ advantage in fumble security.
The Most Important Individual Performances
Several players stand out from the supplied statistics.
Pierre Strong Jr.
Strong was Cleveland’s leading rusher with 89 yards on 13 carries.
His 54-yard run was the game’s longest rushing play.
His 6.8-yard average was also significantly higher than Cleveland’s team average.
Dillon Gabriel
Gabriel led Cleveland’s passing attack with 143 yards on 18 attempts.
He completed 72.2 percent of his passes and averaged 7.9 yards per attempt.
His main negative was the interception and two sacks.
Tyler Huntley
Huntley completed 10 of 13 passes and finished with an 88.9 passer rating.
He avoided an interception and completed 76.9 percent of his attempts.
Kaden Davis
Davis led Cleveland in receiving with 44 yards on three receptions.
He also contributed 60 kickoff return yards on two returns.
That gave him an impact in both the passing and return phases.
KJ Henry
Henry produced Cleveland’s defensive touchdown with a 45-yard interception return.
Kyle McCord
McCord threw Philadelphia’s only passing touchdown and finished with 47 passing yards.
Ainias Smith
Smith recorded two catches for 19 yards and Philadelphia’s receiving touchdown.
Andrew Mukuba
Mukuba produced Philadelphia’s defensive touchdown with a 75-yard interception return.
What the Game Reveals About Preseason Statistics
Preseason statistics should be treated differently from regular-season statistics.
The numbers are real, but their meaning requires context.
Teams use preseason games to evaluate players, test combinations, distribute playing time, and assess depth.
That means a box score does not always tell us who will have the biggest role when the regular season begins.
Still, the statistics are useful for identifying what actually happened during the game.
In this matchup, the data clearly establishes several facts:
- Cleveland moved the ball much more effectively.
- Cleveland’s rushing attack was substantially stronger.
- Cleveland generated more passing yardage.
- Philadelphia struggled to create explosive offensive plays.
- Both teams produced one defensive touchdown.
- Philadelphia recorded more sacks.
- Cleveland had the better overall offensive output.
- Pierre Strong Jr. was Cleveland’s leading rusher.
- Dillon Gabriel led Cleveland in passing yardage.
- Andrew Mukuba and KJ Henry each produced defensive touchdowns for their respective teams.
These conclusions come directly from the supplied game statistics rather than speculation about future roster decisions.
What Fans Should Watch in the Numbers
Anyone reviewing this matchup should avoid focusing only on who scored touchdowns.
A more useful approach is to examine several categories together.
Quarterback efficiency
Look at completion percentage, yards per attempt, interceptions, sacks, and passer rating together.
Running back efficiency
Carries matter, but yards per carry and explosive runs provide additional context.
Receiver production
Receptions show involvement, while receiving yards, average, and longest catch show how productive those opportunities were.
Defensive impact
Sacks, quarterback hits, tackles for loss, interceptions, passes defended, and defensive touchdowns can all reveal different forms of impact.
Ball security
Fumbles and interceptions can change games quickly, especially when they produce points.
Explosive plays
Long runs and long receptions can dramatically affect total offensive output.
Using all of these categories provides a much more complete picture than looking at the final score.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score of Cleveland vs Philadelphia?
The Cleveland Browns defeated the Philadelphia Eagles 22 to 13 in the August 16, 2025 NFL preseason game.
Who was Cleveland’s leading rusher?
Pierre Strong Jr. led Cleveland with 13 carries for 89 yards. He averaged 6.8 yards per carry and had a 54-yard long run.
Who led Cleveland in passing?
Dillon Gabriel led Cleveland in passing, completing 13 of 18 attempts for 143 yards, with one interception and a 72.2 passer rating.
Who led Philadelphia in passing?
Kyle McCord completed 8 of 16 passes for 47 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions. He finished with a 77.1 passer rating.
Which team had more total yards?
Cleveland had 331 total offensive yards, while Philadelphia had 88. The Browns therefore held a 243-yard advantage.
Did both teams score defensive touchdowns?
Yes. Cleveland’s KJ Henry returned an interception 45 yards for a touchdown, while Philadelphia’s Andrew Mukuba returned an interception 75 yards for a touchdown.
Conclusion
The cleveland browns vs philadelphia eagles match player stats show a game in which Cleveland’s overall offensive production was the biggest difference.
The Browns finished with 331 total yards compared with Philadelphia’s 88. Cleveland was especially effective on the ground, rushing for 132 yards at 4.6 yards per carry. Philadelphia managed only 33 rushing yards at 1.7 yards per carry.
Pierre Strong Jr. was Cleveland’s leading rusher with 89 yards, including a 54-yard run. Dillon Gabriel led the Browns in passing with 143 yards, while Tyler Huntley posted the team’s highest passer rating at 88.9.
Philadelphia’s passing game produced only 55 yards, although Kyle McCord did throw a touchdown. Dorian Thompson-Robinson added 17 passing yards and threw one interception.
Defensively, both teams made a major scoring play through an interception return. KJ Henry returned one 45 yards for Cleveland, while Andrew Mukuba produced a 75-yard return for Philadelphia.
The game therefore provides a useful example of why football box scores need to be read as a collection of connected numbers. Philadelphia had more tackles and sacks, and both teams produced a defensive touchdown, but Cleveland’s substantial advantage in total offense, rushing production, passing efficiency, and explosive plays ultimately separated the teams.
For anyone studying this matchup, the clearest takeaway is simple: Cleveland consistently created more opportunities to move the football, while Philadelphia struggled to sustain offensive production. The final 22 to 13 score reflects that broader statistical difference.
