Miami Heat vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats
The miami heat vs san antonio spurs match player stats from the October 30, 2025 meeting tell a much more detailed story than the final score alone. San Antonio defeated Miami 107-101 at Frost Bank Center, improving to 5-0 while Miami fell to 3-2. The Spurs survived a major fourth-quarter comeback because their third-quarter performance created enough separation, while Victor Wembanyama controlled the game on both ends of the floor with 27 points, 18 rebounds, 6 assists, and 5 blocks.
The game was especially interesting because both teams had stretches where they looked in control. Miami opened with 31 points in the first quarter and stayed within striking distance through halftime. San Antonio then produced a decisive 28-point third quarter while holding Miami to only 14 points. Miami responded with 29 points in the fourth, including a 17-1 run early in the period, but San Antonio finished with an 8-3 closing stretch to protect the win.
For anyone researching player performance, the box score shows that this was not simply a Wembanyama versus Bam Adebayo scoring contest. Adebayo led Miami with 31 points and 10 rebounds, Andrew Wiggins added 24, and Simone Fontecchio gave Miami 18 points from the bench. San Antonio received 27 from Wembanyama, 21 from Stephon Castle, 17 from Devin Vassell, and 13 from rookie Dylan Harper.
Miami Heat vs San Antonio Spurs Match Player Stats
Here is the central statistical picture from the game.
| Team | Final Score | FG | 3PT | FT | Rebounds | Assists | Turnovers | Steals | Blocks |
| Miami Heat | 101 | 39-90 | 15-38 | 8-11 | 41 | 29 | 14 | 6 | 2 |
| San Antonio Spurs | 107 | 38-86 | 14-41 | 17-23 | 48 | 26 | 11 | 10 | 8 |
The basic shooting numbers were surprisingly close. Miami shot 43.3% from the field and 39.5% from three, while San Antonio shot 44.2% overall and 34.1% from three. The major difference came at the free-throw line, where the Spurs made 17 of 23 attempts compared with Miami’s 8 of 11.
That difference matters. San Antonio made nine more free throws than Miami and finished the game with a six-point advantage. In a game decided by exactly six points, those free throws were not a minor detail.
The other major statistical gap was rebounding. San Antonio collected 48 rebounds compared with Miami’s 41. The Spurs also produced 10 steals and 8 blocks, while Miami recorded 6 steals and 2 blocks. Those defensive events helped compensate for San Antonio’s lower three-point percentage.
How the Game Was Decided
The final 107-101 score can make the game appear close from beginning to end, but the quarter-by-quarter numbers reveal a different pattern.
Miami scored 31 points in the opening quarter, compared with 33 for San Antonio. The Heat then won the second quarter 27-26, leaving the Spurs ahead by only one point at halftime.
The third quarter changed everything.
San Antonio scored 28 points while Miami managed just 14. That 14-point swing created a 15-point advantage heading into the final period. The Spurs did not need to dominate the fourth quarter. They simply needed to withstand Miami’s response.
Miami nearly did enough to make the comeback complete.
The Heat scored 29 points in the fourth quarter while San Antonio scored 20. According to the NBA’s game recap, Miami opened the final period with a 17-1 run over the first 4:35.
That is the biggest piece of context behind the final score. San Antonio’s third-quarter dominance won the game, but Miami’s fourth-quarter response nearly erased it.
The Spurs ultimately closed the contest with an 8-3 run, preventing Miami from completing the comeback.
Bam Adebayo’s 31-Point Performance
Bam Adebayo was Miami’s most productive offensive player.
He finished with:
- 31 points
- 12-for-27 shooting
- 4-for-13 from three
- 3-for-4 from the free-throw line
- 10 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 1 steal
- 1 block
He played 37 minutes and 10 seconds and finished with a plus-7 rating, which was the best plus-minus among Miami’s listed players.
The most interesting element was his shot volume. Adebayo attempted 27 field goals, 9 more than Wiggins and 15 more than Fontecchio. That tells you how heavily Miami relied on him offensively.
His four made three-pointers were also significant. Adebayo attempted 13 shots from beyond the arc, showing how much the Heat were willing to stretch the matchup and pull San Antonio’s defense away from the paint.
Yet his shooting efficiency was not outstanding. He made 12 of 27 attempts, or 44.4%. His three-point shooting was 4-for-13, or 30.8%. The scoring total was excellent, but it required substantial usage.
This is an important distinction when reading player statistics. A 31-point performance can be highly valuable without necessarily being an efficient scoring night.
Adebayo also grabbed 10 rebounds, giving Miami a genuine two-way interior presence. His three assists show that he contributed as a passer as well, although Miami’s offense ultimately could not produce enough points during the third quarter.
Andrew Wiggins Provides Efficient Scoring
Andrew Wiggins was arguably Miami’s most efficient high-volume scorer.
He scored 24 points on 11-for-18 shooting. That works out to 61.1% from the field. He also made 2 of 5 three-point attempts and collected 6 rebounds, 2 assists, and 2 steals.
The contrast between Wiggins and Adebayo is useful.
Adebayo scored 31 points on 27 shots.
Wiggins scored 24 points on 18 shots.
That does not mean Wiggins had the bigger offensive impact. Adebayo had to carry more creation responsibility. It does show, however, that Wiggins generated his scoring with considerably fewer attempts.
Wiggins also finished with a neutral plus-minus, while Adebayo finished at plus-7. That suggests his individual efficiency did not fully translate into a team advantage during his minutes.
His two steals were tied for Miami’s highest total. That gave the Heat some additional defensive value beyond his scoring.
Simone Fontecchio Gives Miami a Major Bench Boost
Simone Fontecchio was one of the most important secondary contributors for Miami.
He scored 18 points in 27 minutes and 39 seconds while shooting 5-for-9 from the field. Most notably, he made 5 of 7 three-point attempts.
That is a 71.4% three-point shooting night.
He also went 3-for-3 at the free-throw line.
Fontecchio’s performance matters because Miami needed reliable perimeter production while Adebayo carried a large offensive workload.
His 18 points were the third-highest total on the Heat. His plus-3 rating was also positive.
The problem for Miami was not that Fontecchio failed to contribute. It was that the Heat could not consistently combine his shooting with enough production during the third quarter.
Other Miami Contributions
Davion Mitchell finished with 11 points and 4 assists, while Dru Smith added 6 points and 5 assists. Jaime Jaquez Jr. scored 6 points and grabbed 8 rebounds while also recording 6 assists.
Kel’el Ware had a difficult offensive night, finishing scoreless on 0-for-4 shooting. He did contribute 7 rebounds, 3 assists, 1 steal, and 1 block.
The team distribution helps explain the outcome. Miami received strong scoring from its top three contributors, but the Heat needed more efficient production across the rotation to overcome San Antonio’s balanced attack.
Victor Wembanyama Controls Both Ends
Victor Wembanyama was the defining player in the game.
His final line was:
- 27 points
- 10-for-23 shooting
- 1-for-5 from three
- 6-for-8 from the free-throw line
- 18 rebounds
- 6 assists
- 1 steal
- 5 blocks
- 3 turnovers
He played 40 minutes and finished with a plus-3 rating.
The 18 rebounds are particularly important.
San Antonio finished with a seven-rebound advantage as a team, and Wembanyama accounted for 18 of the Spurs’ 48 total rebounds. His 16 defensive rebounds were especially valuable because they ended Miami possessions and reduced second-chance opportunities.
His five blocks also demonstrate how much defensive influence he had beyond the official block statistic.
A player can affect shots without recording a block. Opponents may alter their release, avoid the rim, or pass out of a driving lane simply because a seven-foot-plus defender is waiting near the basket.
In this game, Wembanyama did both. He altered possessions through his presence and directly recorded five blocks.
The NBA’s official recap also noted that Wembanyama’s performance helped San Antonio start 5-0 for the first time in franchise history.
Stephon Castle’s Two-Way Impact
Stephon Castle produced one of the most complete supporting performances for San Antonio.
He recorded:
- 21 points
- 7-for-12 shooting
- 2-for-4 from three
- 5-for-7 from the free-throw line
- 6 rebounds
- 8 assists
- 4 steals
- 1 block
Castle played 35 minutes and 18 seconds and finished with a plus-9 rating.
The eight assists were the highest total in the game.
His four steals were also the most by any player.
That combination is what makes Castle’s performance particularly valuable. He was not simply a scorer playing next to Wembanyama. He helped create offense, pressure the ball, and generate extra possessions.
The 21 points on 12 field-goal attempts were also efficient. He converted 58.3% of his shots from the field.
When assessing this game through a player-impact lens, Castle deserves more attention than a basic points leaderboard would provide.
Devin Vassell’s Rebounding and Scoring
Devin Vassell scored 17 points and grabbed 9 rebounds.
He shot 6-for-16 from the field and made 4 of 12 three-point attempts. His three-point percentage was only 33.3%, but his rebounding was important for a guard-sized perimeter scorer.
Vassell also recorded one block and one assist. He finished with a plus-5 rating.
His nine rebounds were tied for the second-highest total on San Antonio.
That is another reason the Spurs were able to control the possession battle. Wembanyama dominated the glass, but Vassell and the rest of the roster contributed enough to keep Miami from creating a major rebounding advantage.
Dylan Harper Adds Useful Bench Production
Rookie Dylan Harper scored 13 points in 24 minutes and 50 seconds.
He shot 5-for-10 from the field, including 2-for-5 from three, and added 4 assists.
Harper’s contribution gave San Antonio another ball-handler and scorer outside the starting group.
His 13 points were important because the Spurs did not need Wembanyama and Castle to carry every possession. San Antonio had six players score in double figures, according to the game recap.
That balance became especially valuable late in the game when Miami increased its defensive pressure.
San Antonio’s Depth Made a Difference
San Antonio’s scoring distribution was one of the clearest differences between the teams.
The Spurs had six players in double figures. Wembanyama scored 27, Castle 21, Vassell 17, Harper 13, Keldon Johnson 11, and Harrison Barnes 10.
Miami had three players reach 18 or more points, with Adebayo at 31, Wiggins at 24, and Fontecchio at 18.
That does not mean Miami lacked offensive talent. It means San Antonio had more contributors consistently producing at useful levels.
This is one of the strongest lessons from the box score.
A team does not always win because its best player has the highest scoring total. San Antonio won because its star production was combined with strong secondary creation and defensive activity.
The Rebounding Battle
The Spurs won the rebounding battle 48-41.
That seven-rebound advantage is meaningful because both teams shot the ball at similar overall rates.
San Antonio grabbed 9 offensive rebounds and 39 defensive rebounds. Miami collected 5 offensive rebounds and 36 defensive rebounds.
Wembanyama was the centerpiece, with 18 rebounds.
Vassell added 9, while Castle collected 6.
For Miami, Adebayo led with 10, while Ware had 7 and Jaquez Jr. had 8.
The Heat were not destroyed on the glass, but the Spurs consistently secured enough rebounds to prevent Miami from gaining additional possessions.
Turnovers and Defensive Activity
San Antonio committed 11 turnovers compared with Miami’s 14.
That three-turnover difference is modest, but it moved in the same direction as the rebounding advantage.
The Spurs also recorded 10 steals and 8 blocks.
Miami had 6 steals and 2 blocks.
That means San Antonio generated 18 combined steals and blocks, compared with 8 for Miami.
This is not a perfect measure of defense, but it provides a useful snapshot of how aggressively the Spurs disrupted Miami’s possessions.
Castle was especially important with four steals, while Wembanyama contributed five blocks.
Free Throws Were a Hidden Difference
The free-throw numbers deserve more attention than they usually receive.
Miami attempted 11 free throws and made 8.
San Antonio attempted 23 and made 17.
That produced a nine-point advantage in made free throws for the Spurs.
Because the final margin was six points, San Antonio’s free-throw advantage was larger than the final winning margin.
This does not mean free throws alone decided the game. Basketball outcomes are the product of many possessions. But it shows how a relatively small number of high-value scoring opportunities can determine a close contest.
Wembanyama made 6 of 8 free throws. Castle made 5 of 7. Those two players combined for 11 made free throws.
Three-Point Shooting Was Not the Whole Story
Miami actually had the better three-point percentage.
The Heat made 15 of 38 attempts, or 39.5%.
San Antonio made 14 of 41, or 34.1%.
Miami therefore had a five-percentage-point advantage from outside.
Yet San Antonio still won.
This is useful because it prevents an overly simplistic reading of modern NBA games. Three-point shooting is important, but it is only one part of the scoring equation.
San Antonio offset its lower three-point percentage through:
- More free throws made.
- More rebounds.
- Fewer turnovers.
- More steals.
- More blocks.
- More balanced scoring.
The Spurs also scored 18 fast-break points compared with 9 for Miami, according to the NBA’s game summary.
That suggests San Antonio converted defensive success into easier scoring opportunities.
Why the Third Quarter Mattered So Much
If you want to understand the game quickly, focus on the third quarter.
Miami entered halftime only one point behind.
Then San Antonio outscored the Heat 28-14.
A 14-point quarter differential is enormous in a game that ended with a six-point margin.
The third quarter therefore explains why Miami needed such a dramatic fourth-quarter comeback.
The Heat eventually found the offense needed to make the score competitive again, but the deficit created in the third period forced Miami to spend the rest of the game chasing.
This is a useful way to read box scores beyond the headline numbers. Instead of only asking who scored the most points, ask when the points were scored.
Fourth-Quarter Comeback Nearly Changes the Story
Miami’s 29-20 fourth-quarter advantage shows that the Heat did not simply fade after falling behind.
They fought back.
The NBA recap reported a 17-1 Miami run during the first 4:35 of the fourth quarter.
That run changed the pressure of the game.
San Antonio had been in control after its third-quarter surge, but suddenly every possession mattered. The Spurs eventually responded with an 8-3 closing run and escaped with the victory.
For Miami, the comeback demonstrated resilience.
For San Antonio, the closing stretch demonstrated composure.
Both observations can be true at the same time.
What the Plus-Minus Numbers Tell Us
Plus-minus should never be treated as a complete player evaluation, but it can provide useful context.
Adebayo finished at plus-7.
Wiggins finished at 0.
Fontecchio finished at plus-3.
On the Spurs, Castle was plus-9, Vassell plus-5, Wembanyama plus-3, Harper plus-6, and Barnes minus-15.
Barnes’ minus-15 is particularly interesting because San Antonio still won the game.
That demonstrates why plus-minus requires context. A player can have a poor on-court differential in a particular rotation without being solely responsible for the team’s result.
Likewise, a positive plus-minus does not automatically mean a player was the team’s best performer.
The broader statistical profile matters more.
What These Player Stats Reveal About Each Team
The miami heat vs san antonio spurs match player stats reveal two very different paths to success.
Miami relied heavily on individual scoring from Adebayo and Wiggins, with Fontecchio providing efficient perimeter support.
San Antonio relied on a more distributed attack.
Wembanyama was the central force, but Castle created offense, Vassell contributed scoring and rebounding, Harper supplied bench offense, and other Spurs players reached double figures.
The Heat had the better three-point percentage.
The Spurs had the better free-throw production.
Miami had more assists.
San Antonio had fewer turnovers.
Miami had 41 rebounds.
San Antonio had 48.
Those differences collectively explain the six-point result much better than simply saying Wembanyama outscored Adebayo.
Head-to-Head Comparison: Adebayo vs Wembanyama
The individual matchup was one of the most compelling parts of the game.
| Category | Bam Adebayo | Victor Wembanyama |
| Points | 31 | 27 |
| Rebounds | 10 | 18 |
| Assists | 3 | 6 |
| Field Goals | 12-27 | 10-23 |
| Three-Pointers | 4-13 | 1-5 |
| Free Throws | 3-4 | 6-8 |
| Steals | 1 | 1 |
| Blocks | 1 | 5 |
| Turnovers | 2 | 3 |
| Plus-Minus | +7 | +3 |
Adebayo won the scoring battle by four points.
Wembanyama dominated the rebounding battle by eight.
Wembanyama also produced four more assists and four more blocks.
The comparison demonstrates why points alone cannot determine who had the stronger all-around game.
Adebayo was Miami’s leading scorer and posted a double-double.
Wembanyama produced a 27-point, 18-rebound, 6-assist, 5-block performance that influenced almost every major area of the game.
Why San Antonio’s Defense Was Effective
San Antonio’s eight blocks and ten steals are the obvious defensive numbers, but the larger story is possession disruption.
The Spurs made Miami work for shots around the basket.
Wembanyama’s rim protection gave San Antonio a defensive safety net. Castle’s point-of-attack pressure added another layer.
The result was a Heat offense that shot 43.3% overall despite making 39.5% of its threes.
Miami’s offensive numbers were respectable, but the third-quarter collapse shows that the Spurs were able to create a stretch where the Heat struggled to score consistently.
That stretch ultimately determined the result.
Why Miami Still Had Positive Signs
A six-point loss does not mean Miami played badly.
The Heat shot better from three.
They finished with 29 assists.
Adebayo produced 31 points and 10 rebounds.
Wiggins shot 61.1% from the field.
Fontecchio made five threes.
And Miami mounted a 17-1 fourth-quarter run.
Those are meaningful positives.
The primary problem was consistency.
The Heat needed to avoid the 14-point third-quarter output and find a way to generate more defensive resistance against San Antonio’s balanced attack.
The Most Important Numbers at a Glance
For readers who want the fastest summary of the miami heat vs san antonio spurs match player stats, these are the numbers that matter most:
- Final score: Spurs 107, Heat 101
- Wembanyama: 27 points, 18 rebounds, 6 assists, 5 blocks
- Adebayo: 31 points, 10 rebounds, 3 assists
- Wiggins: 24 points on 11-for-18 shooting
- Fontecchio: 18 points on 5-for-7 three-point shooting
- Castle: 21 points, 8 assists, 6 rebounds, 4 steals
- Vassell: 17 points, 9 rebounds
- Harper: 13 points, 4 assists
- Spurs rebounds: 48
- Heat rebounds: 41
- Spurs turnovers: 11
- Heat turnovers: 14
- Spurs free throws made: 17
- Heat free throws made: 8
- Spurs blocks: 8
- Heat blocks: 2
- Spurs third-quarter points: 28
- Heat third-quarter points: 14
These numbers explain the game more clearly than the final score alone.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the top scorer in the Miami Heat vs San Antonio Spurs game?
Bam Adebayo led all scorers with 31 points for Miami. Victor Wembanyama led San Antonio with 27 points.
What were Victor Wembanyama’s stats against Miami?
Wembanyama finished with 27 points, 18 rebounds, 6 assists, 1 steal, and 5 blocks while shooting 10-for-23 from the field.
How many points did Bam Adebayo score?
Adebayo scored 31 points and added 10 rebounds and 3 assists. He shot 12-for-27 from the field and made 4 of 13 three-point attempts.
Who had the most assists in the game?
Stephon Castle led all players with 8 assists. He also scored 21 points, grabbed 6 rebounds, and recorded 4 steals.
Who won the Miami Heat vs San Antonio Spurs game?
The San Antonio Spurs defeated the Miami Heat 107-101 at Frost Bank Center.
What was the biggest difference between the teams?
San Antonio’s advantages in rebounding, free throws, turnovers, steals, and blocks helped offset Miami’s superior three-point percentage. The Spurs also dominated the third quarter 28-14.
Conclusion
The miami heat vs san antonio spurs match player stats show why San Antonio left Frost Bank Center with a 107-101 victory despite Miami having the better three-point percentage.
Bam Adebayo led the game in scoring with 31 points and added 10 rebounds. Andrew Wiggins delivered 24 efficient points, while Simone Fontecchio provided an outstanding 18-point shooting performance from the bench.
San Antonio answered with a broader statistical attack.
Victor Wembanyama produced 27 points, 18 rebounds, 6 assists, and 5 blocks. Stephon Castle added 21 points and led the game with 8 assists and 4 steals. Devin Vassell supplied 17 points and 9 rebounds, while Dylan Harper contributed 13 points and 4 assists.
The most important team numbers were equally revealing. San Antonio outrebounded Miami 48-41, committed three fewer turnovers, made nine more free throws, and recorded six more blocks. Miami’s 39.5% three-point shooting was better than San Antonio’s 34.1%, but that advantage was not enough to overcome the Spurs’ work on the glass and their defensive activity.
Most importantly, San Antonio controlled the third quarter 28-14. Miami’s 29-20 fourth-quarter advantage and 17-1 comeback run made the finish competitive, but the Spurs recovered when it mattered most.
The result was San Antonio’s first 5-0 start in franchise history, while Miami’s three-game winning streak came to an end.
For anyone studying this game, the clearest lesson is simple: the box score becomes much more useful when individual production is connected to timing, efficiency, possession control, rebounding, and defensive disruption.
