Philadelphia eagles vs Kansas city chiefs match player stats

The philadelphia eagles vs kansas city chiefs match player stats from Super Bowl LIX tell a much deeper story than the final 40-22 score. Philadelphia did not simply win because of one outstanding performance. The Eagles controlled the game through a combination of Jalen Hurts’ efficient passing, his ability to create yards on the ground, a disruptive defensive performance, timely takeaways, and reliable kicking. Kansas City, meanwhile, produced several impressive individual numbers, especially from Xavier Worthy, but struggled to turn those plays into sustained offensive success.

Super Bowl LIX was played on February 10, 2025, with Philadelphia entering the championship game at 14-3 and Kansas City at 15-2. The Eagles ultimately produced 40 points while limiting the Chiefs to 22. Looking closely at the player statistics shows why the result became so one-sided, particularly after Philadelphia’s defense began putting consistent pressure on Patrick Mahomes.

The numbers also provide an important lesson for anyone analyzing NFL box scores. A player’s biggest statistical total does not always tell the entire story. Efficiency, turnovers, explosive plays, pressure, field position, and how individual performances fit into the team’s overall strategy can be just as important.

Table of Contents

Philadelphia Eagles vs Kansas City Chiefs Match Player Stats Overview

The headline numbers immediately show Philadelphia’s overall advantage.

Team	Final Score	Record Entering Game	Team Rushing	Team Receiving	Defensive Sacks
Philadelphia Eagles	40	14-3	135 yards	221 yards	6
Kansas City Chiefs	22	15-2	49 yards	257 yards	2

One of the most interesting details is that Kansas City actually recorded more passing yards than Philadelphia. The Chiefs finished with 257 receiving yards compared with Philadelphia’s 221. Yet that advantage did not translate into a victory.

Philadelphia’s rushing production was considerably stronger. The Eagles generated 135 rushing yards, while Kansas City finished with only 49. That 86-yard difference helped Philadelphia maintain control of the game and gave the offense another way to move the ball.

The defensive numbers were even more revealing. Philadelphia recorded six sacks and 11 quarterback hits, compared with two sacks and three quarterback hits for Kansas City.

That pressure difference is critical when evaluating the performance of the two quarterbacks.

Jalen Hurts vs Patrick Mahomes

The quarterback comparison is one of the most important parts of the philadelphia eagles vs kansas city chiefs match player stats.

Jalen Hurts

Hurts completed 17 of 22 passes for 221 yards, averaging 10.0 yards per attempt. He threw two touchdowns and one interception and finished with a 119.7 passer rating.

His rushing production was equally important:

11 carries
72 rushing yards
6.5 yards per carry
1 rushing touchdown
17-yard longest run

That means Hurts directly contributed 293 yards of passing and rushing production, along with three total touchdowns.

His passing efficiency stands out. Completing 17 of 22 attempts means he completed approximately 77.3% of his passes. He also averaged 10 yards per attempt, which indicates that his completions were not simply short, low-risk throws.

The combination of passing efficiency and rushing production made Hurts particularly difficult to contain.

Patrick Mahomes

Mahomes completed 21 of 32 passes for 257 yards.

His statistical line included:

21 completions
32 attempts
257 passing yards
8.0 yards per attempt
3 passing touchdowns
2 interceptions
6-31 sacks
95.4 passer rating

Mahomes also rushed four times for 25 yards, averaging 6.3 yards per carry.

On the surface, three touchdown passes and 257 passing yards look productive. However, the two interceptions and six sacks dramatically changed the value of that production.

Kansas City also struggled to generate a consistent rushing attack, putting additional pressure on Mahomes to create offense through the air.

The quarterback efficiency gap

The passer ratings provide a useful snapshot.

Hurts: 119.7

Mahomes: 95.4

The difference was not simply about completion percentage. Hurts had fewer attempts but produced strong efficiency while also adding 72 rushing yards and a rushing touchdown.

Mahomes had more passing yards and three passing touchdowns, but his two interceptions and six sacks represented costly negative plays.

This is a good example of why quarterback evaluation should go beyond passing yards.

Xavier Worthy Was Kansas City’s Biggest Receiving Threat

Among all Kansas City receivers, Xavier Worthy produced the most impressive statistical performance.

Worthy finished with:

Statistic	Xavier Worthy
Receptions	8
Targets	8
Receiving Yards	157
Average	19.6
Touchdowns	2
Long	50 yards

Worthy caught every pass thrown his way, giving him a perfect 8-for-8 reception rate based on the supplied box score.

His 157 yards accounted for a substantial portion of Kansas City’s 257 receiving yards.

He also produced two touchdowns and a 50-yard reception, giving the Chiefs exactly the type of explosive-play threat that can change a game.

From a statistical-analysis perspective, Worthy’s performance is particularly interesting because it demonstrates how an individual can perform at a very high level while the team still loses comfortably.

The issue was not necessarily the absence of explosive plays. Kansas City had them. The bigger problem was maintaining offensive consistency around those plays.

Travis Kelce’s Numbers

Travis Kelce finished with:

4 receptions
6 targets
39 yards
9.8 yards per reception
0 touchdowns
13-yard longest reception

Kelce’s production was significantly lower than Worthy’s.

Four receptions for 39 yards is not an enormous contribution for a player who has historically been central to Kansas City’s passing attack. More importantly, he did not record a touchdown.

His six targets show that Kansas City did look in his direction, but the production per opportunity was limited compared with Worthy’s output.

This is another reason the overall receiving total needs context. Kansas City finished with 257 receiving yards, but those yards were heavily influenced by Worthy’s explosive performance.

Philadelphia’s Receiving Attack

Philadelphia did not rely on one receiver to produce all of its passing offense.

DeVonta Smith

DeVonta Smith recorded:

4 receptions
5 targets
69 yards
17.3 yards per reception
1 touchdown
46-yard longest reception

His 46-yard reception was the longest catch among Philadelphia’s listed receivers.

Smith’s combination of efficiency and explosiveness gave Philadelphia a major vertical threat.

A.J. Brown

Brown finished with:

3 receptions
5 targets
43 yards
14.3 yards per reception
1 touchdown
22-yard longest reception

Brown was targeted five times and scored a touchdown, making him another important part of Philadelphia’s scoring attack.

Jahan Dotson

Dotson had a smaller workload but produced efficient numbers:

2 receptions
3 targets
42 yards
21.0 yards per reception
27-yard longest reception

His 21.0 yards per reception was the highest average among Philadelphia’s listed receivers.

Saquon Barkley as a receiver

Barkley also contributed through the passing game with:

6 receptions
7 targets
40 yards
6.7 yards per reception
22-yard longest reception

That receiving contribution added another layer to Philadelphia’s offensive approach.

Saquon Barkley’s Rushing Performance

Saquon Barkley carried the ball 25 times for 57 yards.

His numbers were:

25 carries
57 yards
2.3 yards per carry
0 rushing touchdowns
10-yard longest run

At first glance, 57 rushing yards on 25 attempts is not an especially efficient performance.

However, looking only at Barkley’s rushing average would miss an important part of the game.

Philadelphia had other rushing production, particularly from Hurts. The Eagles finished with 135 team rushing yards, despite Barkley averaging only 2.3 yards per carry.

This illustrates an important principle when reading NFL statistics: team rushing success does not always require the lead running back to produce a huge average.

Philadelphia was able to create rushing value through multiple contributors and Hurts’ mobility.

Jalen Hurts’ Rushing Changed the Offensive Equation

Hurts’ 72 rushing yards were a major part of Philadelphia’s victory.

He averaged 6.5 yards per carry and scored one rushing touchdown.

His 17-yard longest run was also the longest rushing play listed for Philadelphia.

When a quarterback can consistently create positive rushing yardage, defenses have to account for an additional runner. That can affect defensive alignment, pursuit angles, and the number of defenders available to focus on traditional rushing plays.

Hurts’ rushing statistics therefore had value beyond the 72 yards appearing in the box score.

They helped make Philadelphia’s offense harder to predict.

Kansas City’s Rushing Attack Struggled

Kansas City finished with only 49 rushing yards on 11 team carries.

The listed rushing production was:

Player	Carries	Yards	Average	Long
Patrick Mahomes	4	25	6.3	8
Kareem Hunt	3	9	3.0	6
Samaje Perine	1	8	8.0	8
Isiah Pacheco	3	7	2.3	6
Team	11	49	4.5	8

Mahomes was actually Kansas City’s leading rusher by yardage.

That statistic says a great deal about the structure of the game.

When the quarterback becomes the team’s leading rushing contributor, the offense can become increasingly dependent on quarterback improvisation and passing efficiency.

That becomes particularly dangerous when the opposing defense is generating heavy pressure.

Philadelphia’s Six Sacks Were a Defining Statistic

One of the strongest indicators in the game was Philadelphia’s six sacks.

Kansas City recorded only two sacks against Hurts.

Philadelphia also registered 11 quarterback hits.

Kansas City recorded only three.

That means the Eagles were not merely getting occasional pressure. They were repeatedly disrupting Mahomes in the pocket.

Mahomes was listed as being sacked six times for 31 yards.

Those lost yards matter because sacks can simultaneously:

Reduce passing yardage.
Create difficult down-and-distance situations.
Interrupt offensive rhythm.
Increase turnover risk.
Push an offense away from its preferred play structure.

The two interceptions thrown by Mahomes added another layer of damage.

Turnovers Were More Important Than Raw Yardage

Kansas City finished with two team fumbles and lost one.

Mahomes was credited with one fumble, which was lost.

Kansas City also threw two interceptions.

Philadelphia, by contrast, recorded no fumbles lost and intercepted Mahomes twice.

Philadelphia’s interceptions came from Cooper DeJean and Zack Baun.

DeJean’s interception was especially impactful because he returned it 38 yards for a touchdown.

That defensive touchdown directly added points without requiring the offense to drive the length of the field.

This is one of the clearest examples of why total yardage does not always determine the winner.

Kansas City actually finished with more receiving yards, but Philadelphia generated more defensive disruption and converted turnovers into meaningful scoring opportunities.

Cooper DeJean’s Defensive Impact

Cooper DeJean recorded three defensive tackles and one interception.

The interception came with a 38-yard return and a defensive touchdown.

A defensive touchdown is statistically different from an ordinary interception.

With a normal interception, the offense receives a new possession and must still move the ball into scoring range.

With DeJean’s interception return, Philadelphia immediately turned the takeaway into seven points after the extra point.

That type of play can dramatically change the game environment.

Zack Baun’s Defensive Contribution

Zack Baun led Philadelphia with seven defensive tackles.

He also recorded an interception.

His two-sided contribution was important because he was involved both in stopping plays and creating a turnover.

Philadelphia’s defensive tackle distribution was fairly broad, with Josh Sweat recording six and Oren Burks five.

The defensive performance therefore was not based on one player alone.

Kansas City’s Leading Tacklers

Drue Tranquill led the Chiefs with 11 tackles.

Nick Bolton followed with nine.

Justin Reid recorded seven.

Chamarri Conner had six.

Several Kansas City defenders recorded five tackles, including Trent McDuffie, Tershawn Wharton, and Mike Pennel.

These numbers show that Kansas City’s defense was active, but tackle volume alone does not mean the defense controlled the game.

The Eagles still scored 40 points.

This is an important distinction in box-score analysis. A high tackle count can indicate that defenders were consistently involved in plays, but it does not automatically indicate that the defense prevented successful offensive outcomes.

Jake Elliott Provided Reliable Scoring

Jake Elliott was perfect on field goals.

He made:

4 of 4 field goals
4 of 4 extra points
Longest field goal: 50 yards
Total points: 16

Sixteen points from one kicker is a major contribution.

Elliott’s four field goals meant Philadelphia converted scoring opportunities even when drives did not end in touchdowns.

That reliability matters in a championship game because field goals can keep an offense from leaving points on the field.

His 50-yard make also demonstrates that Philadelphia had confidence in its kicking game from long range.

Philadelphia’s Offensive Balance

Philadelphia’s overall rushing and receiving numbers were relatively balanced.

The Eagles recorded:

135 rushing yards
221 receiving yards

That produced 356 yards from rushing and passing according to the supplied player totals.

Kansas City recorded:

49 rushing yards
257 receiving yards

That produced 306 yards from the same categories.

Philadelphia therefore gained 50 more combined rushing and receiving yards while also producing substantially more defensive pressure.

The balance is significant.

Kansas City leaned much more heavily toward passing production. Philadelphia was able to generate meaningful production through both the air and the ground.

Why the Final Score Was So Different From the Passing Numbers

A casual review might see:

Kansas City passing yards: 257

Philadelphia passing yards: 221

and assume the Chiefs’ passing offense performed better.

But the final score was:

Philadelphia 40, Kansas City 22.

That gap shows why individual statistical categories need to be analyzed together.

Philadelphia had:

More rushing yards
More sacks
More quarterback hits
Two interceptions
A defensive touchdown
No lost fumbles
A perfect field-goal performance
Strong quarterback rushing production

Kansas City had:

More passing yards
Three passing touchdowns
A huge receiving performance from Worthy

But Kansas City’s offensive production was interrupted by sacks and turnovers.

The difference between productive yardage and useful possessions became one of the defining themes of the game.

Philadelphia Eagles vs Kansas City Chiefs Match Player Stats: Most Important Numbers

The most meaningful statistics can be grouped into several categories.

Quarterback efficiency

Hurts posted a 119.7 passer rating compared with Mahomes’ 95.4.

Rushing advantage

Philadelphia gained 135 rushing yards compared with Kansas City’s 49.

Pressure

Philadelphia recorded six sacks and 11 quarterback hits.

Kansas City recorded two sacks and three quarterback hits.

Turnovers

Mahomes threw two interceptions, and Kansas City lost one fumble.

Philadelphia recorded two interceptions and lost no fumbles.

Defensive scoring

Cooper DeJean returned an interception 38 yards for a touchdown.

Kicking

Elliott made all four field-goal attempts and all four extra-point attempts.

Together, these numbers explain much more than the passing-yard totals alone.

What Xavier Worthy’s Performance Teaches Us

Worthy’s 157 receiving yards and two touchdowns are among the strongest individual numbers in the game.

Yet Kansas City still lost by 18 points.

This is a useful lesson for fantasy football players, sports analysts, and anyone studying box scores.

A player can produce elite fantasy-style statistics without creating enough team-level success to win.

Worthy averaged 19.6 yards per reception and caught all eight of his targets. His production was excellent.

The larger problem was whether Kansas City could repeatedly generate successful plays across the entire offense.

That distinction between individual efficiency and team efficiency is essential.

What Jalen Hurts’ Performance Teaches Us

Hurts’ performance is almost the opposite example.

His 221 passing yards were lower than Mahomes’ 257.

Yet Hurts also contributed 72 rushing yards and a rushing touchdown.

His 17 completions came on only 22 attempts, and he threw two touchdown passes.

His ability to contribute as both passer and runner made his statistical impact larger than his passing totals alone suggest.

This is particularly relevant when comparing mobile quarterbacks with traditional passing statistics.

Passing yards tell only one part of the story.

The Importance of Explosive Plays

Several players produced major explosive plays.

For Kansas City:

Worthy had a 50-yard reception.
Worthy averaged 19.6 yards per catch.

For Philadelphia:

Smith had a 46-yard reception.
Dotson averaged 21.0 yards per reception.
Barkley had a 22-yard reception.
Goedert had a 20-yard reception.

Explosive plays can quickly change field position and scoring opportunities.

However, the team that produces more explosive plays is not automatically guaranteed to win.

Philadelphia combined its explosive plays with defensive pressure and better overall balance.

Comparing the Receiving Distribution

Kansas City’s receiving production was concentrated heavily around Worthy.

Worthy’s 157 yards represented more than half of the team’s 257 receiving yards.

Philadelphia’s production was spread across several players.

Smith had 69 yards.

Brown had 43.

Dotson had 42.

Barkley had 40.

Goedert had 27.

This distribution indicates a more diversified passing contribution.

Philadelphia did not need one receiver to dominate the box score.

Instead, several players produced useful gains.

Special Teams Also Played a Role

Special teams can sometimes disappear from discussions of major games, but this box score shows why that can be a mistake.

Elliott scored 16 points.

Kansas City’s Matt Araiza punted six times for 311 yards, averaging 51.8 yards per punt, with a long of 60 yards.

Philadelphia’s Braden Mann punted twice for 96 yards, averaging 48.0 yards, with two punts inside the 20.

Kansas City’s Nikko Remigio returned three kickoffs for 84 yards, averaging 28.0 yards per return.

Philadelphia’s Will Shipley returned one kickoff for 25 yards.

Cooper DeJean also returned three punts for 27 yards.

These numbers show that Kansas City had some useful special-teams production, but Philadelphia’s kicking efficiency was particularly valuable on the scoreboard.

A Statistical Reading of the Defensive Battle

Philadelphia’s defensive performance deserves special attention because the final score cannot be explained solely through offensive statistics.

The Eagles recorded:

48 tackles
30 solo tackles
6 sacks
6 tackles for loss
4 passes defended
11 quarterback hits
1 defensive touchdown

Kansas City recorded:

76 tackles
47 solo tackles
2 sacks
10 tackles for loss
1 pass defended
3 quarterback hits
0 defensive touchdowns

Kansas City’s higher tackle total is partly explained by the amount of defensive involvement required against Philadelphia’s offense.

Philadelphia’s lower tackle total does not mean its defense was less effective.

The more meaningful indicators are pressure, turnovers, and scoring prevention.

Philadelphia excelled in those areas.

Why Tackles Alone Can Be Misleading

Suppose a defense records 70 tackles.

That number sounds impressive.

But if those tackles are made after an offense repeatedly gains first downs and moves down the field, the defense may still be struggling.

Philadelphia’s 48 tackles came alongside six sacks, two interceptions, 11 quarterback hits, and a defensive touchdown.

Those are much stronger indicators of game-changing defensive impact.

Kansas City’s 76 tackles show that its defenders were active, but the Eagles still reached 40 points.

This is why serious statistical analysis should prioritize context rather than simply ranking players by tackle totals.

Player-by-Player Statistical Leaders

Several individual leaders stand out from the box score.

Passing leader

Patrick Mahomes led in passing yards with 257.

Passing efficiency leader

Jalen Hurts produced the higher passer rating at 119.7.

Rushing leader

Jalen Hurts led Philadelphia with 72 rushing yards.

Receiving leader

Xavier Worthy dominated with 157 receiving yards.

Receiving touchdown leader

Worthy scored two receiving touchdowns.

Tackles leader

Drue Tranquill recorded 11 tackles for Kansas City, while Zack Baun led Philadelphia with seven.

Interception leaders

Cooper DeJean and Zack Baun each recorded one interception for Philadelphia.

Field-goal leader

Jake Elliott converted all four attempts and scored 16 points.

These leaders demonstrate how different statistical categories can produce very different individual winners.

A Deeper Look at Offensive Efficiency

Efficiency is often more useful than volume.

Hurts attempted 22 passes and completed 17.

Mahomes attempted 32 and completed 21.

That means Mahomes had 10 more passing attempts but only four more completions.

Hurts also averaged 10.0 yards per attempt compared with Mahomes’ 8.0.

At the same time, Hurts contributed 72 rushing yards.

This combination gave Philadelphia a highly efficient quarterback performance.

Mahomes still produced 257 yards and three touchdowns through the air, but the six sacks and two interceptions created significant negative value.

How the Game Shows the Limits of Box-Score Analysis

Box scores are extremely useful, but they do not capture every element of football.

They tell us:

Who scored
Who gained yards
Who caught passes
Who made tackles
Who created turnovers
Who recorded sacks
Who converted kicks

They do not fully explain:

Every blocking assignment
Coverage responsibilities
Pre-snap adjustments
Route combinations
Defensive disguise
Coaching decisions
How pressure affected later play calls

Therefore, the statistics should be viewed as evidence rather than a complete description of every tactical detail.

Still, the numbers from this game are unusually clear.

Philadelphia’s combination of quarterback efficiency, rushing production, defensive pressure, turnovers, and kicking was enough to overcome Kansas City’s strong passing numbers.

What the Numbers Say About Each Team

Philadelphia Eagles

Philadelphia’s statistical profile was balanced.

The Eagles had:

135 rushing yards
221 receiving yards
6 sacks
2 interceptions
1 defensive touchdown
4 made field goals
No lost fumbles

The biggest positive was the number of different ways Philadelphia could create value.

Kansas City Chiefs

Kansas City had several excellent individual performances.

The strongest offensive example was Worthy, who recorded 157 receiving yards and two touchdowns.

Mahomes also produced 257 passing yards and three touchdown passes.

But the team struggled to maintain consistency because of:

49 rushing yards
2 interceptions
1 lost fumble
6 sacks allowed
11 quarterback hits allowed

The statistical profile therefore contained impressive individual numbers alongside major team-level problems.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Philadelphia Eagles vs Kansas City Chiefs game?

The Philadelphia Eagles defeated the Kansas City Chiefs 40-22 in Super Bowl LIX on February 10, 2025.

How many passing yards did Jalen Hurts have?

Jalen Hurts completed 17 of 22 passes for 221 yards, with two touchdown passes and one interception.

How many passing yards did Patrick Mahomes have?

Patrick Mahomes completed 21 of 32 passes for 257 yards, with three touchdowns and two interceptions.

Who had the most receiving yards?

Kansas City’s Xavier Worthy led all listed receivers with 157 yards on eight receptions. He also scored two touchdowns.

How many sacks did the Eagles record?

Philadelphia recorded six sacks against Kansas City, while the Chiefs recorded two sacks against Philadelphia.

Who scored the defensive touchdown?

Philadelphia’s Cooper DeJean returned an interception 38 yards for a touchdown.

Conclusion

The philadelphia eagles vs kansas city chiefs match player stats provide a strong example of why football analysis should go beyond the most obvious numbers.

Kansas City had more passing yards, and Xavier Worthy delivered an outstanding receiving performance with 157 yards and two touchdowns. Patrick Mahomes also threw for 257 yards and three touchdowns. Those numbers demonstrate that the Chiefs were capable of producing explosive offensive plays.

Philadelphia, however, won the statistical battle in several areas that had a greater effect on the final result. The Eagles rushed for 135 yards, recorded six sacks, produced two interceptions, scored a defensive touchdown, lost no fumbles, and received a perfect kicking performance from Jake Elliott.

Jalen Hurts was central to that balance. His 221 passing yards were supported by 72 rushing yards and a rushing touchdown. His 119.7 passer rating also exceeded Mahomes’ 95.4.

The defensive pressure may have been the most important difference. Six sacks and 11 quarterback hits placed Kansas City under consistent stress, while the Eagles’ two interceptions created additional opportunities and points.

Ultimately, Philadelphia’s 40-22 victory was not built on one statistical category. It came from combining efficient quarterback play, useful rushing production, explosive receiving plays, defensive pressure, turnovers, and dependable special teams execution.

That is the clearest lesson from this box score: individual brilliance can produce impressive statistics, but championship-level results usually come from how those individual performances work together.