Chargers vs Jacksonville Jaguars Match Player Stats
The chargers vs jacksonville jaguars match player stats from November 16, 2025, tell the story of a game that became increasingly one-sided as the afternoon progressed. Jacksonville defeated Los Angeles 35-6 at EverBank Stadium, using a balanced rushing attack, efficient quarterback play, defensive pressure, and sustained second-half control. The Chargers scored in each of the first two quarters but were held scoreless after halftime, while Jacksonville added three touchdowns after the break.
For readers looking beyond the final score, the box score provides several important details. Justin Herbert completed 10 of 18 passes for 81 yards with one interception, while Trey Lance added 37 passing yards. Jacksonville quarterback Trevor Lawrence completed 14 of 22 passes for 153 yards, one touchdown, and one interception. The biggest statistical difference, however, came on the ground. Jacksonville rushed for 192 yards and four touchdowns compared with only 42 rushing yards for Los Angeles.
This article breaks down the major individual performances, team statistics, passing, rushing, receiving, defense, special teams, scoring sequence, and the numbers that explain why the game developed the way it did.
Chargers vs Jacksonville Jaguars Match Player Stats at a Glance
The chargers vs jacksonville jaguars match player stats can be understood most clearly by starting with the major team numbers.
| Category | Los Angeles Chargers | Jacksonville Jaguars |
| Final Score | 6 | 35 |
| Passing Yards | 93 | 153 |
| Rushing Yards | 42 | 192 |
| Total Passing Attempts | 26 | 22 |
| Completions | 13 | 14 |
| Passing TDs | 0 | 1 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 1 | 1 |
| Rushing TDs | 0 | 4 |
| Receiving Yards | 118 | 153 |
| Defensive Sacks | 0 | 3 |
| Quarterback Hits | 2 | 6 |
| Tackles | 76 | 52 |
| Defensive Passes Defended | 3 | 7 |
| Field Goals | 2 | 0 |
| Final Score | 6 | 35 |
The overall statistical contrast is straightforward. Jacksonville gained 345 yards through passing and rushing combined, while Los Angeles produced 135 total yards from those two categories.
That difference explains much of the final margin.
The Jaguars were not simply winning because of one explosive play. They consistently moved the football on the ground, protected Lawrence from sacks, created pressure on the Chargers, and controlled the game after halftime.
Game Summary and Final Score
Jacksonville won 35-6, with the scoring developing across all four quarters.
The Chargers opened the scoring with a Cameron Dicker field goal in the first quarter. Jacksonville responded with a rushing touchdown from rookie Bhayshul Tuten to take a 7-3 lead.
Dicker added another field goal during the second quarter, but Jacksonville answered with Travis Etienne Jr.’s short rushing touchdown. The Jaguars therefore entered halftime with a 14-6 advantage.
The third quarter became an important turning point. Lawrence scored on a one-yard rushing touchdown, extending the Jaguars’ lead to 21-6.
Jacksonville then added two touchdowns in the fourth quarter. Tim Patrick caught a one-yard touchdown pass from Lawrence, and Etienne scored his second rushing touchdown of the game on a 13-yard run.
The scoring sequence was:
- Chargers: Cameron Dicker, 41-yard field goal
- Jaguars: Bhayshul Tuten, 4-yard rushing touchdown
- Chargers: Cameron Dicker, 46-yard field goal
- Jaguars: Travis Etienne Jr., 2-yard rushing touchdown
- Jaguars: Trevor Lawrence, 1-yard rushing touchdown
- Jaguars: Tim Patrick, 1-yard receiving touchdown
- Jaguars: Travis Etienne Jr., 13-yard rushing touchdown
The official game record confirms the 35-6 final score and the quarter-by-quarter scoring pattern.
Chargers Passing Statistics
The Chargers’ passing production was one of the clearest problems in the game.
Justin Herbert started at quarterback and finished with 10 completions on 18 attempts for 81 yards. He averaged 4.5 yards per attempt and did not throw a touchdown. He also threw one interception and was sacked twice for 18 yards.
His listed passer rating was 44.0, while his QBR was 22.0.
Trey Lance also played and completed three of eight passes for 37 yards. He did not throw an interception or touchdown but was sacked once for seven yards.
Together, the Chargers finished with:
- 13 completions
- 26 attempts
- 93 passing yards
- 4.5 yards per attempt
- 0 passing touchdowns
- 1 interception
- 3 sacks for 25 yards
Justin Herbert’s Numbers
Herbert’s 81 passing yards were particularly notable because Los Angeles entered the game with a 7-3 record according to the game-week standings shown in the official box score.
His passing line:
| Statistic | Justin Herbert |
| Completions | 10 |
| Attempts | 18 |
| Completion Rate | 55.6% |
| Passing Yards | 81 |
| Yards per Attempt | 4.5 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Sacks | 2 |
| Sack Yards | 18 |
| QBR | 22.0 |
| Passer Rating | 44.0 |
The completion percentage alone does not explain the problem. Herbert completed more than half of his attempts, but the offense generated very little yardage from those completions.
That distinction matters.
A quarterback can have an acceptable completion percentage while an offense remains ineffective if the passing game is unable to consistently create first downs or substantial gains.
Trey Lance’s Contribution
Lance completed three of eight attempts for 37 yards.
His statistical line was:
- 3 completions
- 8 attempts
- 37 yards
- 4.6 yards per attempt
- 0 touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
- 1 sack for seven yards
- 52.6 passer rating
The 37 yards did not materially change the Chargers’ offensive production, but Lance’s appearance was part of the broader quarterback usage during a game that had become heavily tilted toward Jacksonville.
Jaguars Passing Statistics
Trevor Lawrence delivered a much more productive passing performance.
He completed 14 of 22 attempts for 153 yards, averaging 7.0 yards per attempt. He threw one touchdown and one interception and was not sacked.
His QBR was 60.8 and his passer rating was 80.3.
| Statistic | Trevor Lawrence |
| Completions | 14 |
| Attempts | 22 |
| Completion Rate | 63.6% |
| Passing Yards | 153 |
| Yards per Attempt | 7.0 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Sacks | 0 |
| QBR | 60.8 |
| Passer Rating | 80.3 |
The difference between the quarterbacks becomes more meaningful when sacks are included.
Lawrence was not sacked, while Chargers quarterbacks were sacked three times. Jacksonville’s ability to keep Lawrence upright allowed the Jaguars to maintain offensive rhythm and continue using the passing game without putting their quarterback in constant recovery situations.
Lawrence also contributed as a runner, which added another layer to Jacksonville’s offensive approach.
Jaguars Rushing Statistics
The rushing numbers were arguably the most important statistical feature of the game.
Jacksonville finished with 47 rushing attempts for 192 yards, an average of 4.1 yards per carry, and four rushing touchdowns.
The Chargers finished with only 16 carries for 42 yards, averaging 2.6 yards per carry with no rushing touchdowns.
That is a difference of 150 rushing yards and four rushing touchdowns.
Bhayshul Tuten
Bhayshul Tuten was one of Jacksonville’s most productive runners.
He recorded:
- 15 carries
- 74 rushing yards
- 4.9 yards per carry
- 1 touchdown
- 15-yard long
His touchdown came on a four-yard run in the first quarter.
Tuten’s 74 yards were the highest rushing total by an individual player in the game.
Travis Etienne Jr.
Etienne produced 73 rushing yards on 19 carries.
His line included:
- 19 carries
- 73 yards
- 3.8 yards per carry
- 2 touchdowns
- 13-yard long
The two touchdowns were particularly significant because they came at different stages of the game.
His second touchdown arrived in the fourth quarter and helped Jacksonville turn a comfortable lead into a decisive 35-point performance.
Etienne also appeared in the receiving statistics but did not record a reception.
LeQuint Allen Jr.
LeQuint Allen Jr. contributed eight carries for 36 yards.
He averaged 4.5 yards per carry and produced a 12-yard long run.
His contribution helped Jacksonville maintain a multi-player rushing rotation instead of relying on a single back.
Trevor Lawrence as a Runner
Lawrence added five carries for nine yards and scored a rushing touchdown.
His touchdown came on a one-yard run in the third quarter.
That play was important because it extended Jacksonville’s lead immediately after halftime and kept the Chargers from gaining momentum.
Chargers Rushing Statistics
Los Angeles struggled to establish a comparable ground game.
The Chargers recorded only 42 rushing yards on 16 attempts.
Justin Herbert led the team with 21 rushing yards on three carries, averaging 7.0 yards per carry.
Kimani Vidal carried five times for 13 yards.
Amar Johnson had two carries for eight yards.
Trey Lance added three carries for one yard.
Trayveon Williams recorded three carries for negative one yard.
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD |
| Justin Herbert | 3 | 21 | 7.0 | 0 |
| Kimani Vidal | 5 | 13 | 2.6 | 0 |
| Amar Johnson | 2 | 8 | 4.0 | 0 |
| Trey Lance | 3 | 1 | 0.3 | 0 |
| Trayveon Williams | 3 | -1 | -0.3 | 0 |
The lack of rushing production put additional pressure on the passing game.
When a team produces only 42 rushing yards and is also struggling to generate passing yards, there are fewer ways to sustain drives consistently.
Chargers Receiving Statistics
The Chargers recorded 12 receptions for 118 receiving yards, with no receiving touchdowns.
Keenan Allen led the team with four receptions for 53 yards.
Oronde Gadsden had two catches for 41 yards and averaged an impressive 20.5 yards per reception.
Ladd McConkey caught three passes but managed only 13 yards.
Tre’ Harris added one reception for 12 yards.
Trayveon Williams had one catch for no gain.
Keenan Allen
Allen was the Chargers’ leading receiver by both receptions and yardage.
His line:
- 4 receptions
- 53 yards
- 13.3 yards per reception
His production represented a substantial portion of the Chargers’ receiving yardage.
However, even with Allen contributing more than 50 yards, the offense still finished with only 93 passing yards because the quarterback group struggled to distribute the ball efficiently across the entire passing attack.
Oronde Gadsden
Gadsden’s two receptions produced 41 yards.
That gave him a 20.5-yard average, the highest average among Chargers players with multiple receptions.
His production shows why individual efficiency can sometimes be hidden inside a low-output offensive performance. The Chargers had a few useful gains, but they did not generate enough of them consistently.
Jaguars Receiving Statistics
Jacksonville recorded 14 receptions for 153 yards and one touchdown.
Jakobi Meyers led the team with five receptions for 64 yards.
Johnny Mundt caught two passes for 25 yards.
Tim Patrick recorded three receptions for 20 yards and a touchdown.
Parker Washington added two catches for 20 yards.
Austin Trammell and Quintin Morris each added one reception.
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD |
| Jakobi Meyers | 5 | 64 | 12.8 | 0 |
| Johnny Mundt | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 0 |
| Tim Patrick | 3 | 20 | 6.7 | 1 |
| Parker Washington | 2 | 20 | 10.0 | 0 |
| Austin Trammell | 1 | 13 | 13.0 | 0 |
| Quintin Morris | 1 | 11 | 11.0 | 0 |
Jakobi Meyers
Meyers was Jacksonville’s leading receiver.
His five catches for 64 yards gave him the largest receiving workload on the team and accounted for more than 40 percent of Jacksonville’s receiving yards.
That production helped complement a rushing attack that was already controlling the game.
Tim Patrick
Patrick finished with three receptions for 20 yards and caught the Jaguars’ only passing touchdown.
His one-yard touchdown reception came during Jacksonville’s long fourth-quarter drive.
Defensive Player and Team Statistics
The defensive numbers provide another explanation for the final margin.
Jacksonville recorded three sacks, five tackles for loss, seven passes defended, and six quarterback hits.
The Chargers recorded no sacks, two tackles for loss, three passes defended, and two quarterback hits.
| Defensive Category | Chargers | Jaguars |
| Total Tackles | 76 | 52 |
| Solo Tackles | 43 | 24 |
| Sacks | 0 | 3 |
| Tackles for Loss | 2 | 5 |
| Passes Defended | 3 | 7 |
| QB Hits | 2 | 6 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 1 |
The higher Chargers tackle total should not automatically be interpreted as superior defensive production.
In this game, Jacksonville had fewer total tackles partly because its offense controlled possession and its defense produced more disruptive plays.
The Jaguars’ six quarterback hits and three sacks indicate more direct pressure on the Chargers’ quarterbacks.
Interceptions and Turnovers
Each team recorded one interception.
Donte Jackson intercepted Trevor Lawrence for Los Angeles.
Antonio Johnson intercepted Justin Herbert for Jacksonville and returned the interception 44 yards.
Neither team lost a fumble.
That means the turnover difference was not caused by multiple giveaways. Instead, the game was shaped more strongly by offensive efficiency, rushing production, field position, and defensive pressure.
Antonio Johnson’s interception was especially notable because it came late in the game, when Los Angeles was already trailing heavily.
The Chargers therefore did not benefit from a turnover advantage that could have helped them reverse the game’s momentum.
Special Teams Statistics
Special teams were not the primary reason for the final score, but there were still useful individual performances.
Cameron Dicker
Dicker made both of his field-goal attempts.
He converted:
- 41 yards
- 46 yards
He finished with six points.
Those were the only points scored by Los Angeles.
Cam Little
Jacksonville’s Cam Little did not attempt a field goal but converted all five extra-point attempts.
He therefore finished with five points.
Derius Davis
Derius Davis handled four Chargers kick returns for 101 yards.
His average was 25.3 yards per return, with a long return of 27 yards.
Trayveon Williams added one return for 22 yards.
The Chargers finished with 123 kick-return yards on five returns.
LeQuint Allen Jr.
Allen returned two kicks for Jacksonville for 55 yards.
He averaged 27.5 yards per return and had a long return of 32 yards.
Time of Possession and Game Control
One of the most revealing statistics was time of possession.
The Chargers had the ball for approximately 22:05.
Jacksonville controlled possession for approximately 37:55.
That is a difference of nearly 16 minutes.
This is important because Jacksonville did more than simply score quickly. The Jaguars were able to sustain drives and keep the Chargers’ offense on the sideline.
Jacksonville’s third-quarter possession was particularly important. The Jaguars held the ball for more than 13 minutes during that quarter, compared with less than two minutes for Los Angeles.
That type of possession imbalance can dramatically affect a game.
A defense that stays on the field for long stretches can become increasingly vulnerable, while an offense that repeatedly gets the ball back may establish a more comfortable rhythm.
How the Game Changed After Halftime
The halftime score was 14-6, meaning the Chargers were still within one-score-plus territory.
The second half looked completely different.
Jacksonville scored seven points in the third quarter and 14 in the fourth.
Los Angeles scored zero points in both quarters.
The Jaguars also ran the ball effectively throughout the second half.
Lawrence’s rushing touchdown made the score 21-6. The fourth-quarter touchdowns from Patrick and Etienne then pushed the advantage to 35-6.
This is one reason the final score should be examined alongside the quarter-by-quarter numbers.
The Jaguars did not need a huge opening quarter to create the margin. Instead, they steadily increased control as the game progressed.
What the Numbers Say About Jacksonville’s Offensive Approach
The Jaguars finished with 192 rushing yards, 153 passing yards, and 345 yards from scrimmage through those two categories.
The distribution was important.
Jacksonville did not have to rely exclusively on Lawrence’s arm. The rushing attack consistently produced positive yardage, while Lawrence contributed both as a passer and runner.
The Jaguars’ four rushing touchdowns were especially significant.
Tuten scored once.
Etienne scored twice.
Lawrence scored once.
That meant Jacksonville’s running game directly accounted for 24 points before the passing touchdown was added.
This balanced approach also helped protect Lawrence. He was not sacked once despite attempting 22 passes.
What the Numbers Say About Los Angeles
The Chargers finished with 93 passing yards and 42 rushing yards.
That is only 135 yards from the two primary offensive categories.
The passing game did not produce a touchdown, and the rushing attack did not produce a touchdown either.
Los Angeles therefore relied entirely on field goals for its scoring.
The two Dicker field goals accounted for all six points.
The Chargers also faced three sacks and six fewer quarterback hits than Jacksonville’s defense recorded.
The combination of limited rushing production and low passing efficiency made it difficult for Los Angeles to maintain scoring opportunities.
A Closer Look at Efficiency
Raw yardage is useful, but efficiency adds more context.
Jacksonville averaged 4.1 yards per rushing attempt.
Los Angeles averaged 2.6.
Jacksonville averaged 7.0 yards per passing attempt through Lawrence.
The Chargers’ team passing average was only 4.5 yards per attempt.
That creates a substantial difference in offensive efficiency.
There was also a major difference in sack production.
Jacksonville allowed zero sacks.
Los Angeles allowed three.
So Jacksonville simultaneously produced more rushing efficiency, better passing efficiency, and stronger defensive pressure.
Those three factors provide a clearer statistical explanation for the 29-point margin than any individual statistic by itself.
Important Individual Performances
Several players stand out when examining the complete box score.
Trevor Lawrence
Lawrence completed 14 of 22 passes for 153 yards, one touchdown, and one interception.
He also ran five times for nine yards and scored a rushing touchdown.
His ability to contribute in both phases was important to Jacksonville’s balanced offense.
Travis Etienne Jr.
Etienne rushed 19 times for 73 yards and two touchdowns.
His two rushing scores were the most by any player in the game.
Bhayshul Tuten
Tuten added 74 yards on 15 carries and scored once.
His 4.9-yard average was the best rushing average among Jacksonville’s primary ball carriers with substantial workloads.
Jakobi Meyers
Meyers led the Jaguars with five receptions and 64 receiving yards.
Justin Herbert
Herbert completed 10 of 18 attempts for 81 yards and threw one interception.
He also rushed for 21 yards.
Keenan Allen
Allen led Los Angeles with four catches for 53 yards.
Oronde Gadsden
Gadsden produced 41 yards on only two catches, giving him a team-high 20.5 yards per reception among Chargers receivers with multiple catches.
Antonio Johnson
Johnson intercepted Herbert and returned the ball 44 yards.
His interception was Jacksonville’s only defensive takeaway.
Key Statistical Differences
When comparing both teams side by side, several differences immediately stand out.
Passing: Jacksonville had 153 passing yards compared with 93 for Los Angeles.
Rushing: Jacksonville had 192 rushing yards compared with 42 for Los Angeles.
Total offensive production: Jacksonville generated 345 passing and rushing yards compared with 135 for Los Angeles.
Rushing touchdowns: Jacksonville scored four. Los Angeles scored none.
Sacks: Jacksonville recorded three. Los Angeles recorded none.
Quarterback hits: Jacksonville had six. Los Angeles had two.
Time of possession: Jacksonville held the ball for approximately 37:55 compared with 22:05 for Los Angeles.
These figures show that the Jaguars controlled the game in several connected areas rather than relying on one statistical advantage.
Why the Rushing Difference Matters So Much
A 150-yard difference in rushing production is not simply a box-score curiosity.
It affects the entire offensive structure.
Jacksonville’s ability to run the ball helped create manageable situations and maintain possession. It also allowed the Jaguars to continue attacking without putting the entire burden on Lawrence.
Meanwhile, the Chargers’ 42 rushing yards meant their passing game had to carry more of the offensive workload.
But Los Angeles’ passing game produced only 93 yards.
That combination created a difficult situation: limited rushing production plus limited passing production.
The Jaguars, by contrast, had strong production in both areas.
The Role of Defensive Pressure
Jacksonville’s defense also made life difficult for the Chargers’ quarterbacks.
Three sacks and six quarterback hits demonstrate consistent pressure.
The Chargers recorded no sacks against Lawrence.
That difference matters because sacks can end drives, create lost yardage, and place an offense behind the chains.
Jacksonville’s pressure also contributed to the interception of Herbert.
The defensive performance therefore worked together with the offensive performance.
The Jaguars’ offense controlled possession, while the defense limited the Chargers’ ability to respond.
Chargers vs Jacksonville Jaguars Match Player Stats: The Main Takeaways
The chargers vs jacksonville jaguars match player stats show a game defined by balance and control rather than one isolated performance.
Jacksonville’s 192 rushing yards were the foundation of its offense. Tuten and Etienne combined for 147 rushing yards and three touchdowns, while Lawrence added another rushing touchdown.
Lawrence also produced 153 passing yards and a touchdown pass.
On defense, Jacksonville generated three sacks, six quarterback hits, five tackles for loss, and seven passes defended.
Los Angeles struggled to generate comparable production.
Herbert finished with 81 passing yards, Lance added 37, and the Chargers had only 42 rushing yards. Their offense produced no touchdowns and scored only through Dicker’s two field goals.
The 35-6 score therefore matches the broader statistical picture.
It was not simply a case of Jacksonville finishing a few drives better. The Jaguars produced more yardage, ran the football more effectively, protected their quarterback, created defensive pressure, controlled possession, and scored touchdowns in both halves.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Chargers and Jaguars?
The Jacksonville Jaguars defeated the Los Angeles Chargers 35-6 on November 16, 2025.
How many passing yards did Justin Herbert have?
Justin Herbert completed 10 of 18 passes for 81 yards, with no touchdowns and one interception.
How many rushing yards did the Jaguars have?
Jacksonville finished with 192 rushing yards on 47 attempts and scored four rushing touchdowns.
Who led the Jaguars in rushing?
Bhayshul Tuten led Jacksonville with 74 rushing yards on 15 carries. Travis Etienne Jr. had 73 yards and two touchdowns.
Who led the Chargers in receiving?
Keenan Allen led Los Angeles with four receptions for 53 yards.
How many sacks did the Jaguars record?
Jacksonville recorded three sacks and six quarterback hits against the Chargers.
Conclusion
The chargers vs jacksonville jaguars match player stats from November 16, 2025, reveal a decisive difference in offensive efficiency, rushing production, defensive pressure, and possession control.
Jacksonville rushed for 192 yards compared with 42 from Los Angeles and scored four rushing touchdowns. Trevor Lawrence added 153 passing yards and a passing touchdown while avoiding a sack. Travis Etienne Jr. scored twice on the ground, Bhayshul Tuten added another rushing touchdown, and Lawrence contributed a rushing score of his own.
For Los Angeles, Justin Herbert finished with 81 passing yards, while the Chargers’ quarterbacks combined for 93 passing yards. The offense produced no touchdowns and was held scoreless in the second half.
The defensive numbers reinforced the result. Jacksonville recorded three sacks, six quarterback hits, five tackles for loss, and seven passes defended. The Chargers managed two quarterback hits and no sacks.
Ultimately, the 35-6 final score was supported by the statistical details across the game. Jacksonville controlled the rushing battle, protected its quarterback, generated pressure, sustained possession, and converted its opportunities into touchdowns.
