Atlanta Hawks vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats
The atlanta hawks vs charlotte hornets match player stats from the November 23, 2025 matchup tell a much more detailed story than the final score alone. Atlanta defeated Charlotte 113-110 at State Farm Arena in a closely contested game that featured 15 lead changes and eight ties. Jalen Johnson delivered the most complete individual performance for Atlanta, while Kon Knueppel led Charlotte in scoring with 28 points.
The game was decided by a combination of efficient Atlanta shooting, superior ball security, strong playmaking, and a decisive third quarter. Charlotte actually produced several impressive numbers of its own, particularly from the free throw line and on the glass. However, Atlanta’s 32 assists and only seven turnovers gave the Hawks an important efficiency advantage.
This breakdown examines the complete atlanta hawks vs charlotte hornets match player stats, including the leading scorers, rebounders, playmakers, shooting numbers, team comparison, quarter-by-quarter performance, and the statistical reasons Atlanta escaped with the three-point victory.
Atlanta Hawks vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The matchup took place at State Farm Arena in Atlanta. The Hawks entered the contest with an 11-7 record, including a 3-4 home record, while Charlotte came in at 4-13 and 1-8 on the road.
Atlanta ultimately won 113-110.
The final margin was only three points, but the game was not a simple back-and-forth scoring contest. Atlanta created separation during the third quarter and then had to withstand Charlotte’s fourth-quarter response.
Here are the key game details:
| Category | Charlotte Hornets | Atlanta Hawks |
| Final Score | 110 | 113 |
| Field Goals | 39-86 | 45-91 |
| Field Goal % | 45.3% | 49.5% |
| 3-Pointers | 14-44 | 11-31 |
| 3-Point % | 31.8% | 35.5% |
| Free Throws | 18-20 | 12-16 |
| Free Throw % | 90% | 75% |
| Rebounds | 43 | 37 |
| Assists | 26 | 32 |
| Turnovers | 15 | 7 |
| Steals | 4 | 6 |
| Blocks | 2 | 5 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 9 | 10 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 34 | 27 |
| Fouls | 15 | 21 |
The official NBA box score confirms the 113-110 result and the statistical profile of the contest.
One of the clearest differences was shooting efficiency. Atlanta made 49.5% of its field goal attempts compared with Charlotte’s 45.3%. That 4.2 percentage-point difference may not look enormous, but across 91 Atlanta attempts, it represents a meaningful scoring advantage.
The other major difference was turnovers.
Atlanta committed just seven turnovers, while Charlotte committed 15. That eight-turnover gap is especially important in a three-point game.
Jalen Johnson Led Atlanta’s Offensive Attack
Jalen Johnson was the central figure in Atlanta’s victory.
He finished with:
- 28 points
- 8 rebounds
- 11 assists
- 11-of-22 shooting
- 2-of-4 from three-point range
- 4-of-5 from the free throw line
- 0 turnovers
- 39:34 minutes
His 28 points tied Kon Knueppel for the game-high.
But the scoring total does not fully explain Johnson’s influence.
The 11 assists are arguably the most important part of his performance. He was able to generate offense for teammates while still carrying a major scoring responsibility.
Even more impressive was the zero-turnover figure.
A player handling the ball enough to produce 11 assists while scoring 28 points and committing no turnovers gives his team an unusually efficient offensive possession profile.
The official NBA game notes specifically highlighted Johnson’s 28 points, eight rebounds, 11 assists, and zero turnovers.
Why Jalen Johnson’s Performance Stood Out
Johnson’s contribution can be divided into three areas.
Scoring: 28 points on 11-of-22 shooting gave Atlanta a reliable scoring option.
Creation: His 11 assists helped Atlanta reach 32 team assists.
Ball security: Zero turnovers meant Atlanta did not sacrifice possession quality while allowing Johnson to create offense.
This is why looking only at points can be misleading when evaluating the atlanta hawks vs charlotte hornets match player stats.
A 28-point performance is excellent. A 28-point, 11-assist performance without a turnover is much more impactful.
Kon Knueppel Was Charlotte’s Leading Scorer
Kon Knueppel matched Johnson’s game-high scoring total with 28 points.
He finished with seven made three-pointers and provided Charlotte with a major perimeter scoring threat.
The NBA’s game coverage noted that Knueppel scored 28 points and made seven threes.
His performance was especially important because Charlotte needed efficient perimeter offense to keep pace with Atlanta.
Knueppel’s scoring helped Charlotte overcome some of its offensive limitations, particularly during stretches when Atlanta was generating more efficient shots inside.
His 28 points also showed why three-point shooting can quickly change the shape of a close game. Charlotte attempted 44 three-pointers, compared with Atlanta’s 31.
However, the higher volume did not translate into a higher percentage.
Charlotte made 14 of 44 attempts, or 31.8%.
That means the Hornets made only about one of every three three-point attempts.
Atlanta, meanwhile, made 11 of 31, or 35.5%.
The Hawks attempted fewer threes but converted at a better rate.
Nickeil Alexander-Walker Produced 23 Points for Atlanta
Nickeil Alexander-Walker was Atlanta’s second-leading scorer with 23 points.
His line included:
- 23 points
- 5 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 8-of-17 shooting
- 3-of-7 from three
- 4-of-6 free throws
- 1 steal
- 1 block
His contribution gave Atlanta another scorer capable of taking pressure away from Johnson.
That mattered because Charlotte could not simply focus its defensive attention on one Atlanta player.
The official NBA box score shows Alexander-Walker played 38:34 and scored 23 points.
His three made three-pointers were also valuable because Atlanta’s overall three-point volume was relatively modest compared with Charlotte’s.
Dyson Daniels Delivered an All-Around Performance
Dyson Daniels scored 22 points and was one of the most complete players on the floor.
His final numbers included:
- 22 points
- 9 rebounds
- 6 assists
- 10-of-17 shooting
- 1-of-4 from three
- 4 offensive rebounds
- 2 steals
- 2 turnovers
Daniels’ 9 rebounds led Atlanta.
His 6 assists also helped Atlanta maintain its team-wide passing advantage.
What stands out from his performance is that Daniels did not need to rely heavily on outside shooting. He made 10 of 17 field goal attempts despite making only one of four attempts from three-point range.
That efficiency gave Atlanta another reliable source of points.
The official box score confirms his 22-point, nine-rebound, six-assist line.
Onyeka Okongwu Added 20 Important Points
Onyeka Okongwu became Atlanta’s fourth player to reach at least 20 points.
He recorded:
- 20 points
- 7 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 8-of-18 shooting
- 2-of-7 from three
- 3 fouls
- 1 turnover
Having four Atlanta players score 20 or more points was a major reason the Hawks were able to win despite Charlotte’s strong offensive effort.
The scoring distribution also demonstrates why Atlanta was difficult to defend.
Charlotte could not simply stop Johnson and expect the offense to collapse.
The Hawks had multiple players capable of producing efficient scoring possessions.
Charlotte’s Secondary Scorers
While Knueppel led Charlotte with 28 points, two other Hornets also passed the 20-point mark.
Collin Sexton
Collin Sexton scored 22 points and served as Charlotte’s second-leading scorer.
His scoring was important because Charlotte needed additional creation alongside Knueppel.
Sexton’s contribution helped keep the game within striking distance after Atlanta’s third-quarter surge.
Miles Bridges
Miles Bridges added 21 points.
As a starter, Bridges provided another significant scoring option and helped Charlotte maintain offensive balance.
Charlotte therefore had three players above 20 points:
- Kon Knueppel: 28
- Collin Sexton: 22
- Miles Bridges: 21
That is a strong top-end scoring distribution.
The problem was that Atlanta had four players above 20 points.
That difference ultimately mattered.
Atlanta’s Four 20-Point Scorers Were the Difference
One of the most important insights from the atlanta hawks vs charlotte hornets match player stats is the contrast between the teams’ scoring depth.
Atlanta had:
- Jalen Johnson: 28
- Nickeil Alexander-Walker: 23
- Dyson Daniels: 22
- Onyeka Okongwu: 20
Charlotte had:
- Kon Knueppel: 28
- Collin Sexton: 22
- Miles Bridges: 21
Atlanta’s fourth high-level scoring option created an advantage that was difficult for Charlotte to overcome.
The NBA’s own game coverage noted that four Atlanta players scored 20 or more points.
This is an important lesson when evaluating box scores.
The team with the highest individual scorer does not automatically have the better offensive performance.
Charlotte had the player who tied for the game’s highest scoring total.
Atlanta had the broader scoring distribution.
Moussa Diabate Controlled the Rebounding Battle
Moussa Diabate was Charlotte’s leading rebounder with 11 boards.
His rebounding work was particularly important because Charlotte finished with 43 total rebounds compared with Atlanta’s 37.
That gave Charlotte a six-rebound advantage overall.
Charlotte also collected nine offensive rebounds.
Atlanta had 10 offensive rebounds, so the difference on the offensive glass was minimal.
Diabate’s 11 rebounds therefore represented one of Charlotte’s clearest individual advantages.
However, rebounding alone could not compensate for Atlanta’s ball security and passing.
Mason Plumlee Led Charlotte in Assists
Mason Plumlee recorded six assists, making him Charlotte’s leading assister.
His playmaking was important in a game where Charlotte finished with 26 assists.
Still, Atlanta’s 32 assists represented a six-assist advantage.
That difference tells us something important about the offensive structure of the game.
Charlotte was able to score 110 points, but Atlanta created more assisted offense.
The Hawks moved the ball more effectively and generated scoring opportunities for a wider group of players.
Atlanta Hawks vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats: Starting Lineups
Atlanta started:
- Onyeka Okongwu
- Jalen Johnson
- Zaccharie Risacher
- Nickeil Alexander-Walker
- Dyson Daniels
Charlotte started:
- Miles Bridges
- Mason Plumlee
- Collin Sexton
- Sion James
- Kon Knueppel
The starting lineups reveal the contrasting structure of the two teams.
Atlanta had multiple players who could contribute as scorers, rebounders, and passers.
Charlotte relied heavily on its primary scoring group while also benefiting from Plumlee’s playmaking and Diabate’s rebounding.
Full Atlanta Hawks Player Stats
The following table provides the main Atlanta player production from the official box score.
| Player | MIN | PTS | REB | AST | FG | 3PT | FT |
| Jalen Johnson | 39:34 | 28 | 8 | 11 | 11-22 | 2-4 | 4-5 |
| Nickeil Alexander-Walker | 38:34 | 23 | 5 | 4 | 8-17 | 3-7 | 4-6 |
| Dyson Daniels | 35:40 | 22 | 9 | 6 | 10-17 | 1-4 | 1-1 |
| Onyeka Okongwu | 34:48 | 20 | 7 | 3 | 8-18 | 2-7 | 2-2 |
| Keaton Wallace | 15:52 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 4-6 | 2-4 | 0-0 |
| Mouhamed Gueye | 17:08 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2-5 | 0-1 | 0-0 |
| Zaccharie Risacher | 21:36 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2-5 | 1-3 | 0-0 |
| Vit Krejci | 32:18 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
| Asa Newell | 4:30 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 |
The official box score records Atlanta’s 45-of-91 shooting and the individual production listed above.
Full Charlotte Hornets Player Stats
The key Charlotte player production can be summarized as follows:
| Player | PTS | REB | AST | Key Contribution |
| Kon Knueppel | 28 | 7 | Not specified in supplied data | 7 made threes |
| Collin Sexton | 22 | Not specified | Not specified | Second-leading scorer |
| Miles Bridges | 21 | Not specified | Not specified | 20+ scoring |
| Moussa Diabate | Not specified | 11 | Not specified | Team-leading rebounder |
| Mason Plumlee | Not specified | Not specified | 6 | Team-leading assister |
| Sion James | Not specified | Not specified | Not specified | Starter |
Only the player statistics provided in the supplied game data are included here rather than filling missing values with assumptions.
That distinction is important for trustworthy sports reporting.
A good statistical article should never manufacture a complete box score simply to make a table look more comprehensive.
The Third Quarter Changed the Game
The quarter-by-quarter score explains how Atlanta won.
| Quarter | Charlotte | Atlanta | Margin |
| 1st | 25 | 28 | Atlanta +3 |
| 2nd | 30 | 25 | Charlotte +5 |
| 3rd | 33 | 39 | Atlanta +6 |
| 4th | 22 | 21 | Atlanta +1 |
| Final | 110 | 113 | Atlanta +3 |
Charlotte actually led the second quarter 30-25.
The game was therefore not controlled by Atlanta from start to finish.
The pivotal period was the third quarter.
Atlanta scored 39 points in that period while Charlotte scored 33.
That six-point swing was almost exactly the final margin.
In practical terms, the game was essentially decided by Atlanta’s ability to produce a stronger offensive quarter after halftime.
The Hawks then survived Charlotte’s fourth-quarter response.
Charlotte Won the Rebounding Battle but Still Lost
A common mistake when reading a basketball box score is to assume that the team with more rebounds should win.
Charlotte had 43 rebounds.
Atlanta had 37.
Yet Atlanta won.
Why?
Because rebounding was only one part of the possession battle.
Atlanta’s seven turnovers were dramatically lower than Charlotte’s 15.
That eight-possession difference helped offset Charlotte’s six-rebound advantage.
Atlanta also recorded 32 assists compared with Charlotte’s 26.
The Hawks therefore created more organized offensive possessions while protecting the ball better.
Turnovers Were One of the Biggest Statistical Differences
This may be the most important number outside the final score.
Atlanta: 7 turnovers
Charlotte: 15 turnovers
Atlanta gave away the ball less than half as often as Charlotte.
That matters because turnovers can erase otherwise good shooting and rebounding numbers.
Charlotte shot 45.3% from the field and grabbed 43 rebounds.
Those are respectable numbers.
But giving the opponent additional possessions through turnovers can neutralize those advantages.
Atlanta’s 7-turnover performance was especially impressive considering Johnson finished with 11 assists and zero turnovers.
That combination reflects excellent offensive decision-making.
Atlanta Was More Efficient From the Field
Atlanta made 45 of 91 field goal attempts.
That is 49.5%.
Charlotte made 39 of 86.
That is 45.3%.
Atlanta therefore made six more field goals despite taking only five more attempts.
This is a relatively simple way to understand the shooting difference.
The Hawks did not simply shoot more.
They converted a higher percentage of their attempts.
That helped compensate for Charlotte’s advantage at the free throw line.
Charlotte Was Excellent at the Free Throw Line
Charlotte made 18 of 20 free throws.
That is an outstanding 90%.
Atlanta made 12 of 16 for 75%.
Charlotte therefore gained six points from the free throw line compared with Atlanta.
In a three-point game, that is significant.
It also shows how close this matchup actually was.
Charlotte did several things well enough to win.
The Hornets simply did not combine those strengths with enough ball security and overall shooting efficiency.
Three-Point Shooting Provides Another Interesting Contrast
Charlotte attempted 44 three-pointers.
Atlanta attempted 31.
That is a 13-attempt difference.
However, Atlanta converted at a higher rate.
Charlotte: 14-of-44, 31.8%
Atlanta: 11-of-31, 35.5%
Charlotte’s 14 made threes were actually three more than Atlanta’s 11.
But Atlanta’s better overall field goal percentage and stronger two-point production helped the Hawks finish ahead.
The official box score also shows Atlanta scored 66 points in the paint compared with Charlotte’s 48.
That 18-point paint advantage is one of the clearest explanations for Atlanta’s offensive efficiency.
Points in the Paint Favored Atlanta
Atlanta scored 66 points in the paint.
Charlotte scored 48.
That is an 18-point advantage.
This is a major finding because it helps explain how Atlanta could win despite Charlotte making more three-pointers.
The Hawks were able to generate consistent offense closer to the basket.
That type of scoring can be particularly valuable when perimeter shooting becomes inconsistent.
Charlotte’s three-point volume was high, but the Hornets converted only 31.8% of those attempts.
Atlanta’s ability to attack the interior reduced its reliance on long-range shooting.
Fast-Break Points Also Favored Atlanta
Atlanta scored 17 fast-break points.
Charlotte scored none.
That is another major difference.
A team does not necessarily need to dominate every statistical category to win.
But when one team has a 17-0 advantage in fast-break scoring, it can have a major impact on the final result.
Atlanta’s transition offense helped turn defensive opportunities into relatively efficient scoring chances.
Charlotte, meanwhile, did not score a fast-break point according to the official box score.
Second-Chance Scoring Was Close
Charlotte scored 21 second-chance points.
Atlanta scored 18.
That three-point advantage came from Charlotte’s nine offensive rebounds.
Atlanta had 10 offensive rebounds, but Charlotte converted its second opportunities more effectively.
This is another reason the game was competitive.
Charlotte had genuine advantages in several areas.
The final result was shaped by how those advantages interacted with Atlanta’s strengths.
Atlanta’s Ball Movement Was Superior
Atlanta finished with 32 assists.
Charlotte finished with 26.
That six-assist advantage suggests that Atlanta’s scoring was supported by stronger team creation.
Johnson’s 11 assists were central to this.
Daniels added six.
Alexander-Walker added four.
Krejci added four.
That distribution allowed Atlanta to generate offense through multiple creators.
The Hawks did not have to rely exclusively on isolation possessions.
The Game Was Extremely Competitive
The contest featured:
- 15 lead changes
- 8 ties
- Charlotte’s biggest lead: 8
- Atlanta’s biggest lead: 10
Those numbers reinforce how close the game was.
Neither team established overwhelming control.
Atlanta’s 10-point maximum lead was only two points larger than Charlotte’s biggest advantage.
The three-point final margin therefore accurately reflects the competitive nature of the matchup.
What the Player Stats Reveal About Atlanta
The most important Atlanta takeaway is offensive balance.
Four players reached 20 points.
Johnson controlled creation.
Daniels contributed scoring, rebounding, assists, and steals.
Alexander-Walker provided perimeter scoring.
Okongwu supplied interior production.
The Hawks also protected the ball extremely well.
From a statistical perspective, this is a strong recipe for winning close games.
A team that has several scoring options and limits turnovers is less vulnerable when one area of the offense is not working perfectly.
What the Player Stats Reveal About Charlotte
Charlotte’s biggest positive was that the Hornets stayed competitive despite losing the possession and efficiency battle in several areas.
Knueppel scored 28 points and made seven threes.
Sexton and Bridges also scored at least 21 points.
Diabate controlled the boards with 11 rebounds.
Plumlee led the team with six assists.
Charlotte also shot 90% from the free throw line.
Those are not the numbers of a team that was completely outplayed.
Instead, they show a team that had enough offensive production to win but lost the statistical balance necessary to close the game.
Atlanta Hawks vs Charlotte Hornets Match Player Stats: Key Winners
Looking specifically at individual statistical impact, several players deserve recognition.
Best Overall Performance: Jalen Johnson
Johnson gets the top spot because of the combination of scoring and playmaking.
Twenty-eight points and 11 assists already represent an outstanding offensive game.
Adding eight rebounds and zero turnovers makes the performance even stronger.
Best Charlotte Scoring Performance: Kon Knueppel
Knueppel tied Johnson with 28 points.
His seven made threes were a major part of Charlotte’s offensive attack.
Best Rebounding Performance: Moussa Diabate
Diabate’s 11 rebounds led all Charlotte players.
Best All-Around Supporting Performance: Dyson Daniels
Daniels produced 22 points, nine rebounds, six assists, and two steals.
His ability to contribute across several categories made him one of Atlanta’s most valuable players.
Most Important Team-Level Advantage: Turnovers
Atlanta’s seven turnovers compared with Charlotte’s 15 were extremely important.
In a three-point game, possession efficiency matters.
How the Game Could Have Been Different for Charlotte
The most obvious improvement would have been reducing turnovers.
Charlotte gave away eight more possessions than Atlanta.
Even without changing the team’s shooting percentages, reducing that gap could have dramatically altered the game.
The Hornets also could have benefited from more efficient three-point shooting.
They attempted 44 threes but made 14.
At 31.8%, the high volume did not produce enough efficiency to offset Atlanta’s interior scoring.
Charlotte’s free throw shooting was already excellent, so that was not the primary problem.
How Atlanta Won Despite Fewer Rebounds
This is one of the most useful lessons from the matchup.
Atlanta had:
- 6 fewer total rebounds
- 6 more assists
- 8 fewer turnovers
- 4.2 percentage points better field goal shooting
- 18 more points in the paint
- 17 more fast-break points
That combination explains the victory far better than the rebound total alone.
Basketball games are multi-variable contests.
A team can lose the rebounding battle and still win comfortably if it dominates efficiency, ball security, and transition scoring.
Atlanta did not win because it was better in every category.
It won because its advantages were more valuable in this particular game.
A Practical Way to Read These Player Stats
If you are analyzing a box score for fantasy basketball, team evaluation, game previews, or historical research, do not begin with points alone.
A better process is:
Step 1: Check the final score
This establishes the result and margin.
Step 2: Identify the leading scorers
This tells you who carried the scoring load.
Step 3: Check shooting efficiency
Compare field goal and three-point percentages rather than only made shots.
Step 4: Examine turnovers
Turnovers can create extra possessions for the opponent.
Step 5: Look at assists
Assists help show whether the offense was driven by individual creation or team ball movement.
Step 6: Check rebounding
Separate offensive and defensive rebounds when possible.
Step 7: Examine scoring locations
Points in the paint and fast-break points can explain why one team scored efficiently.
Step 8: Compare the quarter scores
This reveals when the game actually changed.
Using this process makes the atlanta hawks vs charlotte hornets match player stats much more meaningful than simply listing the top scorers.
Why the Three-Point Margin Was Not Enough for Charlotte
Charlotte made 14 three-pointers.
Atlanta made 11.
On the surface, that looks like a clear Charlotte advantage.
But the Hawks won by three points.
The reason is that three-point makes are only one part of total offensive production.
Atlanta scored 66 points in the paint.
Charlotte scored 48.
Atlanta also scored 17 fast-break points.
Charlotte scored zero.
The Hawks therefore found more efficient scoring opportunities in other areas of the floor.
This is an important analytical point because it prevents a common mistake: assuming that the team with more three-pointers automatically generated the better offense.
Why Jalen Johnson’s Zero Turnovers Matter So Much
Eleven assists with zero turnovers is perhaps the most striking individual statistic in the game.
Every assist represents a successful creation event.
A turnover represents a lost possession.
Johnson therefore created significant offense without directly giving Charlotte a possession through a turnover.
His performance is particularly valuable because he was not simply acting as a pass-first facilitator.
He also scored 28 points.
This combination made him the central offensive engine of the Hawks.
The Broader Meaning of the Game
This matchup is a useful example of why basketball analysis should move beyond points and rebounds.
- Charlotte had the better rebounding total.
- Charlotte made more three-pointers.
- Charlotte shot 90% from the free throw line.
Yet Atlanta won.
The Hawks were more efficient from the field, moved the ball better, protected the ball better, generated more paint scoring, and produced a major transition advantage.
Those factors collectively outweighed Charlotte’s strengths.
That is the deeper story hidden inside the atlanta hawks vs charlotte hornets match player stats.
Statistical Summary
The most important numbers from the game are:
- Final score: Atlanta 113, Charlotte 110
- Jalen Johnson: 28 points, 8 rebounds, 11 assists
- Kon Knueppel: 28 points
- Nickeil Alexander-Walker: 23 points
- Dyson Daniels: 22 points, 9 rebounds, 6 assists
- Onyeka Okongwu: 20 points, 7 rebounds
- Collin Sexton: 22 points
- Miles Bridges: 21 points
- Moussa Diabate: 11 rebounds
- Mason Plumlee: 6 assists
- Atlanta field goal percentage: 49.5%
- Charlotte field goal percentage: 45.3%
- Atlanta assists: 32
- Charlotte assists: 26
- Atlanta turnovers: 7
- Charlotte turnovers: 15
- Atlanta rebounds: 37
- Charlotte rebounds: 43
- Atlanta points in the paint: 66
- Charlotte points in the paint: 48
- Atlanta fast-break points: 17
- Charlotte fast-break points: 0
The official NBA box score provides the underlying team and player figures used for this analysis.
FAQs
Who scored the most points in the Atlanta Hawks vs Charlotte Hornets game?
Jalen Johnson of Atlanta and Kon Knueppel of Charlotte tied for the game-high with 28 points each.
Who led the Atlanta Hawks in assists?
Jalen Johnson led Atlanta with 11 assists. He also scored 28 points, grabbed eight rebounds, and committed zero turnovers.
Who led the Charlotte Hornets in rebounds?
Moussa Diabate led Charlotte with 11 rebounds.
Who had the most assists for Charlotte?
Mason Plumlee led the Hornets with six assists.
Which team shot better from the field?
Atlanta shot 49.5% from the field, while Charlotte shot 45.3%.
Why did Atlanta win despite Charlotte having more rebounds?
Atlanta compensated with better field goal efficiency, more assists, fewer turnovers, more points in the paint, and a major fast-break scoring advantage. The Hawks had seven turnovers compared with Charlotte’s 15.
Conclusion
The atlanta hawks vs charlotte hornets match player stats show that Atlanta’s three-point victory was built on balanced offense rather than one isolated statistical advantage.
Jalen Johnson was the standout performer with 28 points, eight rebounds, 11 assists, and zero turnovers. Dyson Daniels added 22 points, nine rebounds, and six assists, while Nickeil Alexander-Walker scored 23 and Onyeka Okongwu added 20. That gave Atlanta four players with at least 20 points.
Charlotte had its own strong individual performances. Kon Knueppel scored 28 points and made seven threes, while Collin Sexton and Miles Bridges contributed 22 and 21 points respectively. Moussa Diabate controlled the boards with 11 rebounds, and Mason Plumlee led the team in assists with six.
The decisive statistical story was not simply scoring. Charlotte won the rebounding battle and made more three-pointers, but Atlanta shot more efficiently, committed eight fewer turnovers, recorded six more assists, scored 18 more points in the paint, and held a 17-0 advantage in fast-break points.
That combination explains how Atlanta finished with 113 points and secured a narrow 113-110 victory.
For anyone studying this game, the biggest lesson is simple: a box score becomes much more useful when individual production is connected to possession quality, shooting efficiency, ball movement, and scoring location.
