Atlanta Hawks vs Orlando Magic Match Player Stats
The Atlanta Hawks vs Orlando Magic match player stats from the October 2025 meeting tell a much more interesting story than the 111-107 final score alone. Atlanta overcame a 12-point fourth-quarter deficit, outscored Orlando 33-21 in the final period, and received a decisive late-game contribution from Trae Young. Orlando had the more productive individual scorer in Franz Wagner, who finished with 27 points, but Atlanta’s combination of shot-making, ball security in key moments, and late-game execution ultimately produced the win.
The game was played at Kia Center in Orlando and ended with Atlanta improving to 1-1 overall and 1-0 on the road, while Orlando also moved to 1-1. The official NBA box score records the game as October 24, 2025, although some listings display it as October 25 depending on time-zone or database conventions. For statistical accuracy, this article uses the official game data associated with ESPN Game ID 401809943 and NBA game ID 0022500090.
What makes this matchup worth studying is the contrast between individual production and team execution. Wagner led all scorers with 27 points and shot 10-for-17 from the field. Young scored 25 points and added six assists, but his most important contribution came late, when he scored six points during the final 46 seconds to help Atlanta close the game. The Hawks also received 19 points from Nickeil Alexander-Walker, 17 from Onyeka Okongwu, and 13 points from Mouhamed Gueye off the bench.
Atlanta Hawks vs Orlando Magic Match Player Stats: Complete Game Breakdown
The headline numbers show a four-point Atlanta victory, but the underlying statistics explain why the result changed so dramatically during the final quarter.
| Category | Atlanta Hawks | Orlando Magic |
| Final score | 111 | 107 |
| Field goals | 41-85 | 37-78 |
| Field-goal percentage | 48.2% | 47.4% |
| Three-pointers | 8-29 | 9-31 |
| Three-point percentage | 27.6% | 29.0% |
| Free throws | 21-28 | 24-37 |
| Free-throw percentage | 75.0% | 64.9% |
| Rebounds | 40 | 45 |
| Assists | 26 | 21 |
| Turnovers | 16 | 22 |
| Steals | 9 | 7 |
| Blocks | 5 | 3 |
| Points in the paint | 58 | 52 |
One of the clearest statistical differences was ball security. Orlando committed 22 turnovers compared with Atlanta’s 16. That six-turnover gap mattered because the Hawks converted their possessions more effectively when the game tightened.
Orlando also won the rebounding battle 45-40 and attempted nine more free throws. On paper, those are strong indicators for the home team. Yet Atlanta’s superior assist total, lower turnover count, and stronger fourth-quarter performance offset those advantages.
This is an important lesson when reading basketball box scores: the team with more rebounds or free throws does not automatically control the game. Basketball outcomes often come from how efficiently those advantages are converted into points and how well a team protects possessions.
Atlanta Hawks Player Statistics
Trae Young
Trae Young finished with 25 points, six assists, one rebound, three steals, and one turnover in 34 minutes. He shot 7-for-18 from the field, 1-for-6 from three-point range, and 10-for-12 from the free-throw line.
The shooting percentages were not extraordinary, particularly from outside. His 1-for-6 three-point performance produced a 16.7% success rate from deep. Yet the box score does not fully capture his influence.
Young’s 10-for-12 free-throw shooting was critical. More importantly, his late-game production changed the contest.
According to the game recap, Young scored six points in the final 46 seconds. That sequence illustrates why raw shooting percentage should not be treated as the only measure of a point guard’s impact. A player can have an inefficient shooting night while still becoming the most important offensive decision-maker during the closing possessions.
Young also recorded six assists against only one turnover. That 6-to-1 assist-to-turnover ratio is particularly useful when evaluating his performance because it shows that his playmaking remained controlled despite Orlando’s defensive pressure.
His final plus/minus was +8, the best mark among Atlanta’s starters.
Nickeil Alexander-Walker
Nickeil Alexander-Walker produced one of Atlanta’s most valuable supporting performances.
He scored 19 points on 8-for-18 shooting and added four assists and one steal. His biggest weakness was perimeter efficiency: he made only 1 of 10 attempts from three-point range.
That statistic might look alarming in isolation. However, Alexander-Walker still provided 19 points and helped carry the scoring burden alongside Young and Okongwu.
His plus/minus was -1, which also demonstrates why plus/minus should be interpreted carefully. Atlanta won by four, yet one of its leading scorers finished slightly negative in that category.
Onyeka Okongwu
Okongwu scored 17 points, shooting 5-for-10 from the field and 6-for-7 at the free-throw line. He added four rebounds, three assists, one steal, and three blocks.
The three blocks stand out.
Atlanta did not dominate Orlando on the glass, but Okongwu’s defensive presence gave the Hawks rim protection without requiring him to score at an elite volume.
His 6-for-7 free-throw performance was also important because Orlando’s defense could not completely eliminate his scoring opportunities around the basket.
Jalen Johnson
Jalen Johnson finished with 12 points and eight rebounds in 26 minutes.
He shot 5-for-10 from the field and made both of his free-throw attempts. He also contributed one assist and one steal.
Johnson’s eight rebounds were particularly useful because Orlando finished with a five-rebound team advantage. His individual work helped Atlanta remain competitive in a game where the Magic generated more overall rebounding opportunities.
However, his plus/minus was -12. That is a reminder that individual box-score production and overall lineup impact can tell different stories.
Dyson Daniels
Dyson Daniels had a quieter scoring night but delivered one of the most useful all-around performances for Atlanta.
He recorded six points, nine rebounds, four assists, two steals, and one block.
Nine rebounds from a perimeter player are significant in a game where Atlanta was outrebounded overall. Daniels also contributed four assists and two steals, giving him influence across several statistical categories.
His plus/minus was +10, the best among Atlanta’s starters.
That combination is one of the strongest examples from the game of why evaluating only points can produce an incomplete picture.
Mouhamed Gueye
Gueye came off the bench and scored 13 points in approximately 30 minutes according to the ESPN box score data associated with the game.
He shot 5-for-9 from the field, made 2 of 5 three-point attempts, and collected eight rebounds and three assists.
His +21 plus/minus was the highest figure recorded by either team.
That number deserves attention. Gueye was not Atlanta’s leading scorer, but his minutes coincided with a substantial positive scoring margin for the Hawks. His rebounding and two-way contribution gave Atlanta additional flexibility while the game moved through its decisive stages.
Atlanta’s Bench Production
Atlanta’s bench also received contributions from Luke Kennard, Asa Newell, N’Faly Dante, Vit Krejci, and Keaton Wallace.
Kennard scored six points, while Newell scored five points in limited minutes. Krejci added five points and Wallace contributed three.
The bench was not simply about total points. The Hawks benefited from having several players capable of contributing without requiring every possession to run through Young.
That becomes especially important in a close game where defensive adjustments can limit a primary scorer.
Orlando Magic Player Statistics
Franz Wagner
Franz Wagner was the standout individual scorer of the game.
He finished with 27 points, six rebounds, two assists, and one steal in 35 minutes.
His shooting line was excellent: 10-for-17 from the field, 2-for-5 from three, and 5-for-6 from the free-throw line.
That translates to a 58.8% field-goal percentage and 40% shooting from three.
Wagner’s performance was arguably the most efficient high-volume scoring display in the game. He was also one of the main reasons Orlando controlled large portions of the contest.
Yet his -2 plus/minus shows the difference between individual production and the final team result. Wagner played well enough statistically to lead the game in scoring, but Atlanta’s late rally prevented that performance from producing a victory.
Paolo Banchero
Paolo Banchero had a difficult offensive night.
He finished with 11 points, six rebounds, one assist, and three turnovers.
His shooting line was 4-for-15 from the field, 0-for-5 from three, and 3-for-5 from the free-throw line.
His 26.7% field-goal percentage was the lowest among Orlando’s major scoring options.
The five missed three-point attempts were particularly important because Banchero’s perimeter shooting could have helped Orlando punish Atlanta’s defensive adjustments.
Instead, Atlanta was able to survive the difficult shooting performance from one of Orlando’s primary offensive weapons.
Banchero’s -10 plus/minus further reflects the difficult night, although plus/minus alone should never be used to determine whether a player played well.
Desmond Bane
Desmond Bane recorded 15 points, seven rebounds, five assists, and three turnovers.
He shot 5-for-14 from the field and 1-for-7 from three.
The seven rebounds and five assists added value beyond his scoring.
Bane’s five assists tied him with the highest assist total for Orlando. His ability to contribute across multiple categories was one of the stronger parts of the Magic’s performance.
However, the 1-for-7 three-point shooting reduced the spacing benefit Orlando expected from its perimeter attack.
Jalen Suggs
Jalen Suggs scored 11 points in 19 minutes while shooting 4-for-5 from the field and 3-for-4 from three-point range.
He also contributed three rebounds and four assists.
His shooting efficiency was excellent, especially from long range. The interesting part of his stat line is that Orlando received efficient scoring from Suggs but did not receive enough overall offensive consistency across the lineup to preserve its fourth-quarter advantage.
Suggs finished with a +4 plus/minus, one of only two Orlando starters to finish positive.
Wendell Carter Jr.
Wendell Carter Jr. posted 10 points and eight rebounds.
He shot 2-for-4 from the field but went 6-for-11 from the free-throw line.
His eight rebounds were tied for Orlando’s team lead among the players listed in the supplied game data, and his two steals added defensive value.
The free-throw performance was the biggest weakness in his offensive line. Converting even a few additional attempts could have changed the scoring margin in a four-point game.
Tristan da Silva
Tristan da Silva was one of Orlando’s strongest bench contributors.
He scored 15 points on 5-for-10 shooting, including 2-for-4 from three-point range. He also added six rebounds and three assists.
His plus/minus was +8, the best mark among Orlando players in the box score.
That makes his performance particularly noteworthy. Orlando received efficient bench scoring and positive possession impact from da Silva, but the Magic could not maintain the same level of effectiveness during the closing stretch.
Orlando’s Other Bench Contributions
Goga Bitadze scored three points and grabbed five rebounds while blocking two shots.
Tyus Jones added four points, two assists, and one steal.
Anthony Black scored eight points, three rebounds, two assists, and one steal.
Jett Howard scored three points in limited action.
These contributions mattered because Orlando used multiple players to support its primary offensive group. The problem was not a complete lack of depth. The bigger issue was that Atlanta executed better when the margin became small.
Atlanta Hawks vs Orlando Magic Match Player Stats: Who Actually Controlled the Game?
The simplest answer is that Orlando controlled much of the game through the first three quarters, while Atlanta controlled the part that mattered most.
The scoring by quarter tells the story:
- First quarter: Atlanta 25, Orlando 24
- Second quarter: Atlanta 26, Orlando 37
- Third quarter: Atlanta 27, Orlando 25
- Fourth quarter: Atlanta 33, Orlando 21
Orlando’s second-quarter surge created a 61-51 halftime lead.
The Magic then extended their advantage in the third and entered the fourth quarter with a substantial position of control.
But Atlanta produced its best offensive quarter of the night when the game became most urgent.
The Hawks scored 33 points in the fourth quarter while holding Orlando to 21.
That 12-point fourth-quarter swing erased the Magic’s advantage and turned a likely Orlando victory into an Atlanta win.
The Fourth Quarter Was the Defining Statistical Story
The most important number in this matchup is not Young’s 25 points or Wagner’s 27.
It is 33-21.
That was Atlanta’s fourth-quarter scoring advantage.
The Hawks did not simply outscore Orlando by four over the full game. They recovered from a major deficit by producing their strongest offensive quarter at exactly the right time.
The NBA’s official game recap noted that Orlando led by 12 early in the fourth quarter but shot only 7-for-21 in the period.
That decline in efficiency opened the door for Atlanta.
Young then delivered six points during the final 46 seconds, turning late possessions into a decisive advantage.
This is a useful way to read close-game statistics. A team’s overall shooting percentage can hide when its best or worst possessions occurred.
Atlanta’s 48.2% shooting was solid but not dominant.
Its 27.6% three-point shooting was below ideal.
Its 16 turnovers were higher than a team would prefer.
Yet those flaws became less damaging because the Hawks executed better during the closing possessions.
Shooting Efficiency Explains Part of the Result
Atlanta finished 41-for-85 from the field, or 48.2%.
Orlando went 37-for-78, or approximately 47.4%.
The difference is small.
Neither team shot the ball exceptionally well from three.
Atlanta made 8 of 29 three-point attempts, while Orlando made 9 of 31.
That means the game was not decided by a dramatic three-point shooting gap.
Instead, the difference came from several smaller factors working together.
Atlanta generated 26 assists compared with Orlando’s 21. The Hawks also converted 21 of 28 free throws, while Orlando made 24 of 37.
Interestingly, Orlando attempted nine more free throws but made only three more.
That means the Magic’s free-throw volume advantage did not translate into a major scoring advantage.
Turnovers Were a Major Difference
Orlando committed 22 turnovers.
Atlanta committed 16.
That six-possession difference is significant in a game decided by four points.
The Hawks also generated 9 steals compared with Orlando’s 7.
This created additional opportunities for Atlanta to score before Orlando’s defense could become fully organized.
The lesson is straightforward: possession value becomes more important as games become closer.
A missed shot can be recovered through a rebound.
A turnover ends the possession immediately and can create an offensive opportunity for the opponent.
In this game, Orlando’s turnover total became particularly costly because Atlanta was able to capitalize during the comeback.
Rebounding Favored Orlando
Orlando won the overall rebounding battle 45-40.
The Magic also collected 12 offensive rebounds compared with Atlanta’s nine.
That gave Orlando extra opportunities and helped explain why the home team was able to control stretches of the game.
Wendell Carter Jr. and Desmond Bane each made meaningful contributions on the glass, while Franz Wagner added six rebounds.
Atlanta’s response came from several players contributing rather than one dominant rebounder.
Dyson Daniels led the Hawks with nine rebounds, while Jalen Johnson and Mouhamed Gueye each contributed eight.
That distribution helped offset Orlando’s five-rebound team advantage.
Assists Showed Atlanta’s Better Offensive Connectivity
Atlanta recorded 26 assists.
Orlando recorded 21.
The five-assist difference matters because it indicates Atlanta created more scoring opportunities through shared offensive actions.
Young led the Hawks with six assists.
Daniels added four, while several other players contributed secondary playmaking.
Orlando received five assists from Bane and four from Suggs.
The Magic were not completely stagnant offensively, but Atlanta’s extra passing connections helped create a more balanced attack.
This is especially relevant when a team faces a late-game comeback. If the offense depends too heavily on one scorer, defensive pressure can become easier to organize.
Atlanta had multiple players capable of attacking or finishing possessions.
Why Franz Wagner’s 27 Points Were Not Enough
Wagner was the game’s leading scorer.
He was also one of its most efficient shooters.
So why did Orlando lose?
Because scoring volume is only one part of winning basketball.
Wagner’s 27 points were excellent, but Orlando’s other major scoring options were less consistent.
Banchero scored 11 points on 4-for-15 shooting.
Bane scored 15 on 5-for-14 shooting.
Carter Jr. scored 10.
Suggs scored 11 but played only 19 minutes.
The Magic also turned the ball over 22 times.
When a team loses a 12-point fourth-quarter lead, the issue is rarely one isolated player. It is usually a combination of shot selection, turnovers, defensive execution, rebounding, and late-game decision-making.
Why Trae Young’s 25 Points Mattered More Than the Number Suggests
Young’s 25 points were not the most efficient scoring performance in the game.
Wagner’s 27 points came on 10-for-17 shooting.
Young made 7 of 18 field goals.
Yet Young’s value increased because of timing.
His six points in the final 46 seconds directly influenced the outcome.
He also made 10 of 12 free throws and finished with six assists against one turnover.
That combination gave Atlanta a reliable late-game creator who could score or create opportunities for teammates.
This is one of the strongest practical insights from the matchup: when evaluating a player’s performance, ask when the production occurred, not only how much production occurred.
Plus/Minus Provides Another Layer of Context
Plus/minus is often misunderstood.
It measures the team’s point differential while a player is on the floor. It does not isolate individual performance.
That distinction is important in this game.
For Atlanta:
- Mouhamed Gueye: +21
- Dyson Daniels: +10
- Trae Young: +8
- Onyeka Okongwu: -11
- Jalen Johnson: -12
- Nickeil Alexander-Walker: -1
For Orlando:
- Tristan da Silva: +8
- Jalen Suggs: +4
- Franz Wagner: -2
- Anthony Black: +2
- Tyus Jones: -9
- Paolo Banchero: -10
- Wendell Carter Jr.: -10
- Desmond Bane: -7
These numbers should not be read as a simple ranking of who played well.
For example, Wagner was clearly productive offensively despite a negative plus/minus.
Likewise, Gueye’s +21 suggests Atlanta performed extremely well during his minutes, but it does not mean he was individually 23 points better than every player with a negative figure.
The best approach is to combine plus/minus with traditional statistics, shooting efficiency, turnovers, rebounding, and the game situation.
The Most Important Player Comparisons
Trae Young vs. Jalen Suggs
Young provided the superior overall offensive workload.
He scored 25 points and produced six assists.
Suggs was far more efficient as a shooter, going 4-for-5 from the field and 3-for-4 from three.
The contrast is revealing.
Young was Atlanta’s primary offensive organizer.
Suggs provided highly efficient scoring and secondary playmaking but played a smaller total role.
Franz Wagner vs. Jalen Johnson
Wagner clearly won the scoring comparison with 27 points against Johnson’s 12.
However, Johnson contributed eight rebounds, while Wagner had six.
Wagner was the more important scorer, but Johnson provided valuable physical production for Atlanta.
The matchup ultimately favored Atlanta because the Hawks did not need Johnson to match Wagner’s scoring output.
They needed him to contribute in other areas.
Dyson Daniels vs. Desmond Bane
This is one of the most interesting statistical comparisons.
Daniels:
- 6 points
- 9 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 2 steals
- 1 block
Bane:
- 15 points
- 7 rebounds
- 5 assists
- 3 turnovers
Bane produced more offense.
Daniels produced a broader defensive and rebounding impact.
Neither player dominated every category, which illustrates how differently their roles affected the game.
What the Box Score Says About Atlanta’s Winning Formula
The Atlanta performance suggests a formula built around several complementary strengths.
First, the Hawks had multiple scoring options.
Young scored 25.
Alexander-Walker scored 19.
Okongwu scored 17.
Gueye scored 13.
Johnson scored 12.
That distribution prevented Orlando from relying on one defensive matchup to control the game.
Second, Atlanta moved the ball effectively.
Twenty-six assists are a strong number compared with 21 for Orlando.
Third, Atlanta protected possessions better.
Six fewer turnovers in a four-point game is a major difference.
Fourth, the Hawks delivered their best offensive performance in the fourth quarter.
That final point may be the most important.
What Orlando Can Take From the Game
The Magic’s statistics were not those of a team that played badly for four quarters.
They shot 47.4% from the field.
They outrebounded Atlanta.
They attempted more free throws.
Wagner had an excellent game.
The problem was maintaining those advantages late.
The fourth quarter exposed three areas that changed the outcome.
Closing efficiency
Orlando shot 7-for-21 in the final quarter.
That is approximately 33.3%.
For a team trying to protect a double-digit lead, that level of shooting leaves too much room for a comeback.
Turnovers
Twenty-two turnovers are too many in a close game.
Even if Orlando had retained its rebounding advantage, the possession deficit created by turnovers made it harder to survive Atlanta’s late push.
Late-game execution
The Magic had the lead but could not finish the game.
Atlanta’s late offensive execution, especially Young’s production, shifted the momentum.
How to Read Player Stats More Intelligently
A good box-score analysis should follow a process rather than simply identify the highest scorer.
Start with the final score.
Then examine quarter-by-quarter scoring.
Next, compare shooting efficiency.
After that, look at turnovers, rebounds, assists, free throws, and defensive statistics.
Finally, use plus/minus as supporting evidence rather than the primary conclusion.
For this game, that process produces a much clearer answer:
- Orlando built a significant advantage during the second quarter.
- The Magic maintained a lead deep into the game.
- Atlanta’s offense became more effective in the fourth quarter.
- Orlando’s fourth-quarter shooting declined.
- Orlando committed six more turnovers overall.
- Young delivered decisive late-game scoring.
- Atlanta had enough secondary production to support Young.
- The Hawks won despite losing the rebounding battle.
That is much more informative than simply saying Atlanta won 111-107.
Key Takeaways From the Matchup
The Atlanta Hawks vs Orlando Magic match player stats reveal several practical lessons for anyone analyzing NBA games.
The leading scorer does not always play for the winning team
Wagner scored 27, the most points in the game.
Atlanta still won.
Efficiency and timing both matter
Young’s field-goal percentage was lower than Wagner’s, but his late-game impact was decisive.
Turnovers can outweigh rebounding advantages
Orlando won the rebound battle 45-40 but committed 22 turnovers.
Atlanta committed 16.
Supporting players can determine the outcome
Gueye’s 13 points, eight rebounds, three assists, and +21 plus/minus were highly valuable.
Daniels’ nine rebounds and defensive contributions also mattered.
Fourth-quarter execution is often more revealing than full-game averages
Atlanta scored 33 points in the fourth.
Orlando scored 21.
That was the difference between losing and winning.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the leading scorer in the Atlanta Hawks vs Orlando Magic game?
Franz Wagner led all scorers with 27 points for Orlando. Trae Young led Atlanta with 25 points.
How many points did Trae Young score against Orlando?
Trae Young scored 25 points. He also recorded six assists, three steals, one rebound, and only one turnover.
Who had the most rebounds in the game?
Dyson Daniels led Atlanta with nine rebounds. Orlando’s leading rebounder was Wendell Carter Jr. with eight rebounds, with several other Magic players also making strong contributions on the glass.
Did the Hawks or Magic shoot better from three-point range?
Orlando shot slightly better from three, making 9 of 31 attempts for 29.0%. Atlanta made 8 of 29 for 27.6%.
Why did Atlanta win despite Orlando having more rebounds?
Atlanta compensated for the rebounding disadvantage with more assists, fewer turnovers, and stronger fourth-quarter execution. The Hawks also received decisive late scoring from Trae Young.
What was the biggest difference in the game?
The fourth quarter was the clearest difference. Atlanta outscored Orlando 33-21 in the final period. Orlando also committed six more turnovers overall, which reduced the value of its rebounding advantage.
Conclusion
The Atlanta Hawks vs Orlando Magic match player stats provide a strong example of why NBA games should be analyzed beyond points per game or the name at the top of the scoring column.
Franz Wagner was the game’s leading scorer and one of its most efficient players. Orlando also won the rebounding battle and attempted more free throws. Those numbers explain why the Magic were in position to win for much of the night.
Atlanta’s advantage came from the details.
The Hawks produced 26 assists, committed six fewer turnovers, received contributions from several players, and saved their strongest offensive quarter for the fourth. Dyson Daniels contributed nine rebounds and four assists. Mouhamed Gueye delivered an excellent all-around performance from the bench. Onyeka Okongwu provided 17 points and three blocks. Most importantly, Trae Young combined 25 points with six assists and made the decisive plays during the final moments.
The final 111-107 score therefore understates how dramatically the game changed.
Orlando controlled important stretches, but Atlanta finished better.
For readers studying player performance, the matchup demonstrates the value of combining traditional box-score numbers with context. Points identify production. Shooting percentages identify efficiency. Rebounds reveal possession opportunities. Assists show offensive connection. Turnovers expose lost possessions. Plus/minus adds lineup context. The game situation explains why some statistics matter more than others.
Taken together, those numbers make the result much easier to understand: Orlando had the stronger individual scoring performance at the top, but Atlanta had the more effective overall closing performance when the game was decided.
