Chicago Bears vs 49ers Match Player Stats
The chicago bears vs 49ers match player stats tell the story of one of the most entertaining NFL contests of the 2025 regular season. Played in Week 1 on December 29, 2025, the San Francisco 49ers defeated the Chicago Bears 42 to 38 in a game filled with explosive offense, standout quarterback performances, and momentum swings that kept fans engaged until the final whistle.
While the final score favored San Francisco, the numbers reveal a much closer battle than the scoreboard alone suggests. Caleb Williams delivered another impressive passing performance for Chicago, Brock Purdy efficiently led the 49ers’ offense, Christian McCaffrey dominated the ground game, and several young receivers stepped into the spotlight with career defining performances.
This detailed breakdown goes beyond the box score by examining how both teams performed in every phase of the game, which individual players had the biggest impact, and what the statistics reveal about the strengths and weaknesses of each team. Whether you are reviewing the game, comparing player performances, or looking for a complete statistical analysis, this guide covers every important detail.
Match Overview
The Week 1 meeting between the Chicago Bears and San Francisco 49ers lived up to expectations. Both offenses consistently moved the football, creating one of the highest scoring games of the week.
| Match Details | Result |
| Event | San Francisco 49ers vs Chicago Bears |
| League | NFL |
| Week | Week 1 |
| Date | December 29, 2025 |
| Venue | San Francisco |
| Final Score | 49ers 42, Bears 38 |
| Winner | San Francisco 49ers |
The game remained competitive from the opening kickoff. Chicago matched San Francisco score for score during the first quarter before both offenses continued producing big plays throughout the afternoon. Ultimately, the 49ers’ dominant rushing attack proved to be the deciding factor.
Quarter by Quarter Score Breakdown
Both teams scored early and often, making defensive stops extremely valuable.
| Quarter | Chicago Bears | San Francisco 49ers |
| First | 14 | 14 |
| Second | 7 | 14 |
| Third | 7 | 7 |
| Fourth | 10 | 7 |
| Total | 38 | 42 |
The first quarter immediately established the tone. Each team scored 14 points, showing that both offenses had prepared aggressive game plans.
San Francisco created separation before halftime by outscoring Chicago 14 to 7 during the second quarter. Although the Bears fought back in the second half, they were never able to completely erase the deficit.
Chicago Bears vs 49ers Match Player Stats Breakdown
The chicago bears vs 49ers match player stats highlight exceptional performances on both sides of the football.
Team Offensive Comparison
| Category | Chicago Bears | San Francisco 49ers |
| Passing Yards | 330 | 303 |
| Rushing Yards | 110 | 200 |
| Total Passing TD | 2 | 3 |
| Team Rushing TD | 2 | 3 |
| Total Points | 38 | 42 |
| Fumbles Lost | 0 | 0 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 0 | 1 |
One statistic immediately stands out. Although Chicago generated more passing yards, San Francisco controlled the game on the ground.
The 49ers rushed for 200 yards compared to Chicago’s 110, creating consistent first downs and helping sustain long scoring drives.
Caleb Williams Continues His Development
Chicago quarterback Caleb Williams produced another encouraging performance despite the loss.
Caleb Williams Passing Statistics
| Statistic | Value |
| Completions | 25 |
| Attempts | 42 |
| Passing Yards | 330 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Passer Rating | 100.3 |
Williams demonstrated excellent decision making throughout the game by avoiding turnovers while attacking every level of the field.
His connection with Luther Burden III and Colston Loveland consistently challenged the San Francisco secondary. Completing 25 passes for 330 yards against a talented defense reflects both confidence and continued growth.
Perhaps the most encouraging statistic is the zero interceptions. Protecting the football kept Chicago within striking distance throughout the contest.
Brock Purdy Delivered Another Efficient Performance
San Francisco quarterback Brock Purdy once again proved why efficiency matters more than sheer passing volume.
Brock Purdy Passing Statistics
| Statistic | Value |
| Completions | 24 |
| Attempts | 33 |
| Passing Yards | 303 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 3 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Passer Rating | 118.6 |
Although Purdy threw one interception, his three touchdown passes outweighed that mistake.
Completing 24 of 33 attempts also demonstrated outstanding accuracy, while his 118.6 passer rating ranked among the strongest performances of the week.
Most importantly, Purdy consistently capitalized on favorable field position created by San Francisco’s productive rushing attack.
Quarterback Comparison
Both quarterbacks played winning caliber football.
| Category | Caleb Williams | Brock Purdy |
| Passing Yards | 330 | 303 |
| Completion Percentage | 59.5% | 72.7% |
| Passing TD | 2 | 3 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 1 |
| Passer Rating | 100.3 | 118.6 |
Williams finished with more passing yards, but Purdy completed a higher percentage of throws while producing an additional touchdown pass.
Efficiency ultimately favored the 49ers quarterback.
Christian McCaffrey Controlled the Ground Game
No offensive player influenced the outcome more than Christian McCaffrey.
Rushing Statistics
| Statistic | Value |
| Carries | 23 |
| Rushing Yards | 140 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Long Run | 41 |
McCaffrey consistently gained positive yardage, allowing San Francisco to remain balanced throughout the game.
His longest run of 41 yards shifted momentum and helped set up another scoring opportunity.
The Bears struggled to limit explosive runs, and McCaffrey took full advantage by averaging more than six yards per carry.
D’Andre Swift Provided Balance for Chicago
Chicago relied on D’Andre Swift to complement its passing attack.
Rushing Statistics
| Statistic | Value |
| Carries | 9 |
| Rushing Yards | 54 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Long Run | 22 |
Although Swift received fewer opportunities, he maximized them by scoring twice.
His two rushing touchdowns helped keep Chicago within one possession during critical stretches of the game.
However, Chicago’s inability to establish a sustained rushing attack placed additional pressure on Caleb Williams to carry the offense through the air.
Team Rushing Comparison
The ground game became the defining difference between both teams.
| Category | Chicago Bears | San Francisco 49ers |
| Attempts | 22 | 34 |
| Rushing Yards | 110 | 200 |
| Average Production | 5.0 Yards per Carry | 5.9 Yards per Carry |
| Rushing TD | 2 | 3 |
San Francisco finished with nearly double Chicago’s rushing production.
That advantage allowed the 49ers to control the pace, shorten third down situations, and keep their offense on schedule throughout the afternoon.
Wide Receiver Performances That Changed the Game
While the quarterbacks received much of the attention, several receivers delivered outstanding individual performances. Their ability to create separation and gain yards after the catch played a major role in one of the highest scoring games of the week.
Chicago Receiving Leaders
Chicago’s passing attack featured contributions from multiple playmakers, making it difficult for the 49ers to focus on a single receiver.
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Touchdowns |
| Luther Burden III | 8 | 138 | 1 |
| Colston Loveland | 6 | 94 | 1 |
Luther Burden III was Chicago’s most productive receiver. His eight catches for 138 yards consistently moved the chains and created explosive plays. Whether working across the middle or stretching the field, he proved to be Caleb Williams’ most reliable target.
Colston Loveland also made a significant impact. His six receptions for 94 yards included a touchdown that kept Chicago within reach during the second half. His ability to find open space in key situations demonstrated why he has become an important part of the offense.
Together, Burden and Loveland accounted for 232 of Chicago’s 330 receiving yards, highlighting how heavily the passing game relied on their production.
San Francisco Receiving Leaders
The 49ers spread the football effectively instead of relying on one dominant receiver.
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Touchdowns |
| Ricky Pearsall | 5 | 85 | 0 |
| Jake Tonges | 7 | 60 | 1 |
Ricky Pearsall led the team in receiving yards with 85. Although he did not score, his receptions helped extend drives and create favorable field position.
Jake Tonges contributed seven catches for 60 yards and one touchdown. His consistent production in short and intermediate routes complemented San Francisco’s run-first approach.
Rather than forcing the ball to one player, Brock Purdy distributed passes efficiently across multiple targets, making the offense more difficult to defend.
Team Receiving Comparison
| Category | Chicago Bears | San Francisco 49ers |
| Receptions | 25 | 24 |
| Receiving Yards | 330 | 303 |
| Receiving Touchdowns | 2 | 3 |
Chicago generated slightly more receiving yards, but San Francisco finished more drives with touchdowns through the air. That difference proved valuable in a game decided by only four points.
Defensive Statistics
Although the game featured plenty of offense, several defensive players produced memorable moments.
Chicago Bears Defensive Leaders
| Category | Player | Statistics |
| Leading Tackler | Tremaine Edmunds | 9 Total, 7 Solo |
| Interception | T.J. Edwards | 34 Yard Pick Six |
Tremaine Edmunds led the Bears with nine total tackles, frequently stopping runs before they developed into even bigger gains.
The defensive highlight belonged to T.J. Edwards. His interception return for a touchdown provided one of Chicago’s biggest momentum swings and demonstrated excellent awareness and anticipation.
Overall, Chicago’s defense recorded:
- 78 total tackles
- 41 solo tackles
- 1 sack
- 3 tackles for loss
- 6 passes defended
- 1 defensive touchdown
Despite these positive moments, containing San Francisco’s rushing attack remained a challenge throughout the game.
San Francisco Defensive Leaders
| Category | Player | Statistics |
| Leading Tackler | Tatum Bethune | 11 Total, 7 Solo |
Tatum Bethune led all defenders with 11 total tackles. His performance helped limit several potential big gains by Chicago’s running backs.
San Francisco’s defense finished with:
- 58 total tackles
- 35 solo tackles
- 4 tackles for loss
- 5 passes defended
- No sacks
While the 49ers did not record a sack, they made enough timely stops to protect their narrow lead during critical moments.
Turnovers and Ball Security
Turnovers often determine close NFL games, but this matchup presented an interesting contrast.
Chicago Bears
- No fumbles
- No interceptions thrown
- One interception recorded on defense
- Defensive touchdown from the interception return
San Francisco 49ers
- No fumbles
- One interception thrown
- No defensive interceptions
Chicago actually won the turnover battle, yet San Francisco still secured the victory.
This serves as an excellent example that winning the turnover margin does not always guarantee success. The 49ers compensated through superior rushing production and greater offensive efficiency.
Special Teams Performance
Special teams quietly influenced field position throughout the game.
Chicago Bears
| Category | Player | Statistics |
| Kicker | Cairo Santos | 1 of 1 Field Goal, 5 of 5 Extra Points |
| Punter | Tory Taylor | 3 Punts, 176 Yards, 58.7 Average |
| Kick Returner | Josh Blackwell | 3 Returns, 73 Yards |
Cairo Santos converted every scoring opportunity presented to him, while Tory Taylor averaged an impressive 58.7 yards per punt, repeatedly flipping field position.
San Francisco 49ers
| Category | Player | Statistics |
| Kicker | Eddy Pineiro | 6 of 6 Extra Points |
| Punter | Thomas Morstead | 2 Punts, 81 Yards |
| Kick Returner | Skyy Moore | 4 Returns, 92 Yards |
| Punt Returner | Skyy Moore | 2 Returns, 11 Yards |
Skyy Moore contributed valuable return yardage, giving San Francisco favorable starting field position on several possessions.
Key Statistical Differences
Looking beyond individual numbers, several team statistics explain why San Francisco emerged victorious.
1. Rushing Dominance
The most significant difference came on the ground.
- Chicago rushed for 110 yards.
- San Francisco rushed for 200 yards.
That 90-yard advantage allowed the 49ers to control possession and dictate the pace of the game.
2. Red Zone Execution
Both offenses moved the ball effectively, but San Francisco consistently finished drives with touchdowns instead of settling for fewer points.
Three passing touchdowns and three rushing touchdowns reflected exceptional execution when scoring opportunities appeared.
3. Offensive Balance
Chicago relied heavily on Caleb Williams and the passing attack.
San Francisco balanced the offense between Brock Purdy’s efficient passing and Christian McCaffrey’s dominant rushing, making the unit less predictable.
4. Time Management
Although official possession time is unavailable, the rushing statistics strongly suggest that San Francisco controlled longer drives and reduced the number of possessions available to Chicago.
Sustained drives also helped keep the Bears’ offense on the sideline during important stretches of the game.
What the Statistics Reveal
The chicago bears vs 49ers match player stats show that Chicago’s offense is capable of competing with one of the league’s strongest teams. Caleb Williams continues to develop into a dependable franchise quarterback, and the young receiving corps demonstrated impressive chemistry.
For San Francisco, the numbers reinforce an identity built around balance. Brock Purdy avoided unnecessary risks for most of the game, Christian McCaffrey controlled the running game, and multiple receivers contributed when opportunities arose.
The final score reflected a contest between two efficient offenses rather than one team dominating the other. The difference came from San Francisco’s ability to generate consistent rushing production while capitalizing on scoring opportunities.
Individual Player Stats Summary
The following table highlights the top individual performances from both teams.
| Player | Team | Performance |
| Brock Purdy | San Francisco 49ers | 24/33, 303 Passing Yards, 3 TD, 1 INT, 118.6 Rating |
| Caleb Williams | Chicago Bears | 25/42, 330 Passing Yards, 2 TD, 0 INT, 100.3 Rating |
| Christian McCaffrey | San Francisco 49ers | 23 Carries, 140 Rushing Yards, 1 TD |
| D’Andre Swift | Chicago Bears | 9 Carries, 54 Rushing Yards, 2 TD |
| Luther Burden III | Chicago Bears | 8 Receptions, 138 Receiving Yards, 1 TD |
| Colston Loveland | Chicago Bears | 6 Receptions, 94 Receiving Yards, 1 TD |
| Ricky Pearsall | San Francisco 49ers | 5 Receptions, 85 Receiving Yards |
| Jake Tonges | San Francisco 49ers | 7 Receptions, 60 Receiving Yards, 1 TD |
| Tremaine Edmunds | Chicago Bears | 9 Total Tackles, 7 Solo |
| Tatum Bethune | San Francisco 49ers | 11 Total Tackles, 7 Solo |
| T.J. Edwards | Chicago Bears | 1 Interception Returned 34 Yards for a Touchdown |
What Decided the Game?
The final margin of four points reflected how evenly matched both teams were for much of the contest. However, a closer examination of the numbers reveals several factors that ultimately separated the 49ers from the Bears.
San Francisco Won the Battle on the Ground
The clearest advantage came in the running game.
San Francisco finished with 200 rushing yards and three rushing touchdowns compared to Chicago’s 110 rushing yards and two rushing touchdowns. Christian McCaffrey consistently gained positive yardage, allowing the offense to stay ahead of the chains and maintain balance throughout the game.
That success reduced pressure on Brock Purdy and created more favorable passing situations.
Brock Purdy Was More Efficient in Scoring Situations
Although Caleb Williams threw for more passing yards, Brock Purdy converted his opportunities into points more effectively.
Purdy completed 72.7 percent of his passes and threw three touchdown passes, while Williams threw two touchdowns despite leading in total passing yards.
Efficiency often matters more than volume, and this game demonstrated that principle clearly.
Chicago’s Passing Attack Was Outstanding
One positive takeaway for Chicago was the continued development of its passing offense.
Caleb Williams, Luther Burden III, and Colston Loveland combined for an explosive aerial performance that generated 330 passing yards without a single interception from Williams.
Against many opponents, that level of production would likely be enough to secure a victory.
The Turnover Battle Was Not Enough
Chicago recorded the game’s only defensive interception, and T.J. Edwards returned it 34 yards for a touchdown.
Despite winning the turnover margin, the Bears could not overcome San Francisco’s superior rushing production and balanced offensive approach.
This serves as a reminder that turnovers are important, but controlling the line of scrimmage often has an even greater impact on the outcome.
Lessons From This Match
This matchup provided valuable insights into both teams as they continued their season.
For Chicago, the game highlighted the rapid development of its young offensive core. Caleb Williams displayed poise under pressure, while Luther Burden III and Colston Loveland proved capable of producing against a strong defense. If the Bears improve their rushing consistency and defensive run stopping, they will become even more competitive in close games.
For San Francisco, the performance reinforced a formula that has delivered success for several seasons. A balanced offense, efficient quarterback play, and an elite rushing attack remain difficult for opponents to stop over four quarters.
Perhaps the biggest lesson from this game is that offensive balance can outweigh even an impressive passing performance. Chicago generated more passing yards, but San Francisco’s ability to consistently run the football ultimately created the difference.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Chicago Bears vs 49ers game?
The San Francisco 49ers defeated the Chicago Bears by a final score of 42 to 38 in Week 1 on December 29, 2025.
Who had the most passing yards in the game?
Caleb Williams led all quarterbacks with 330 passing yards, while Brock Purdy finished with 303 passing yards.
Who was the leading rusher?
Christian McCaffrey led all rushers with 140 yards on 23 carries and scored one rushing touchdown.
Which receiver had the most receiving yards?
Luther Burden III recorded a game high 138 receiving yards on eight receptions and added one touchdown.
What was the biggest statistical difference between the two teams?
The largest difference was rushing production. San Francisco rushed for 200 yards, while Chicago finished with 110 rushing yards.
Did either team lose a fumble?
No. Neither team lost a fumble during the game.
Conclusion
The chicago bears vs 49ers match player stats illustrate why this game ranked among the most exciting contests of the 2025 season. Both offenses performed at a high level, combining for 80 total points and more than 900 yards of offense. Caleb Williams continued to show growth as Chicago’s franchise quarterback, while Brock Purdy delivered another efficient performance that guided San Francisco to victory.
Christian McCaffrey’s dominance on the ground ultimately proved to be the deciding factor. His 140 rushing yards helped the 49ers control the tempo and sustain drives, giving their offense the balance needed to edge a talented Bears team. Chicago’s young playmakers also made a strong impression, suggesting the offense has the potential to become one of the league’s most productive units.
When viewed as a whole, the statistics reveal a closely contested matchup where execution in key moments mattered more than total yardage. San Francisco capitalized on its strengths, while Chicago demonstrated encouraging progress despite falling just short.
