Orlando Magic vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats
The orlando magic vs phoenix suns match player stats from April 1, 2026, tell the story of a close game decided by Orlando’s first-half surge, Phoenix’s third-quarter response, and a disciplined finish from the home team. The Orlando Magic defeated the Phoenix Suns 115-111 at the Kia Center in Orlando, Florida, in a game that featured strong individual performances from Devin Booker, Desmond Bane, Paolo Banchero, Jalen Suggs, Wendell Carter Jr., and Oso Ighodaro.
Phoenix entered the game with a 42-34 record and an 18-19 road mark, while Orlando was 40-35 overall and 24-15 at home. The result also leveled the season series at 1-1 after Orlando had previously defeated Phoenix 113-110 in a double-overtime meeting on February 22, 2026.
For anyone reviewing orlando magic vs phoenix suns match player stats, the most important detail is that the box score does not tell the entire story by itself. Phoenix scored 38 points in the third quarter and made the game extremely competitive, but Orlando’s 42-point second quarter created enough separation for the Magic to withstand the Suns’ comeback attempt.
Orlando Magic vs Phoenix Suns Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The matchup took place at the Kia Center in front of 19,117 fans. Orlando finished with 115 points compared with Phoenix’s 111, giving the Magic a four-point victory.
The quarter-by-quarter scoring shows exactly how the game developed:
| Quarter | Phoenix Suns | Orlando Magic |
| Q1 | 21 | 28 |
| Q2 | 35 | 42 |
| Q3 | 38 | 24 |
| Q4 | 17 | 21 |
| Final | 111 | 115 |
Orlando established control early, leading 28-21 after the opening period. The Magic then produced their biggest offensive quarter of the game in the second, scoring 42 points while Phoenix managed 35.
That gave Orlando a 70-56 halftime advantage.
Phoenix’s response after halftime was significant. The Suns scored 38 points in the third quarter and reduced the deficit dramatically. The game entered the fourth quarter tied at 94.
The final period therefore became a four-point game in which every possession carried greater importance. Orlando scored 21 points in the fourth while Phoenix managed 17.
The NBA’s own coverage reported that Orlando won 115-111, with Desmond Bane scoring 21 points for the Magic.
Team Shooting Comparison
The shooting numbers provide an important explanation for the result.
| Category | Phoenix Suns | Orlando Magic |
| Field Goals | 35-88 | 35-79 |
| FG Percentage | 40% | 44% |
| Three-Pointers | 14-46 | 10-29 |
| 3PT Percentage | 30% | 34% |
| Free Throws | 27-35 | 35-41 |
| FT Percentage | 77% | 85% |
| Rebounds | 41 | 46 |
| Assists | 24 | 24 |
| Turnovers | 20 | 25 |
| Steals | 9 | 13 |
| Blocks | 4 | 1 |
At first glance, Phoenix’s three-point volume stands out. The Suns attempted 46 three-pointers, compared with 29 for Orlando.
However, Orlando made five more free throws and shot them at a better percentage. The Magic converted 35 of 41 attempts from the foul line, while Phoenix made 27 of 35.
That difference matters because the final margin was only four points.
Orlando also had a five-rebound advantage, collecting 46 boards compared with Phoenix’s 41. The Magic and Suns each recorded 24 assists, so neither team held an advantage in total assists.
The unusual part of the statistical profile was turnovers. Orlando committed 25 turnovers, five more than Phoenix. Normally, that would be a major warning sign for a team trying to close a tight game.
Yet Orlando compensated through better field-goal efficiency, superior free-throw production, more rebounds, and 13 steals.
Phoenix Suns Player Stats
The Suns received a major offensive performance from Devin Booker, who finished with 34 points and seven assists.
Devin Booker
Booker’s line was the clearest individual scoring highlight for Phoenix:
- 34 points
- 8-of-16 field goals
- 2-of-6 three-pointers
- 16-of-19 free throws
- 3 rebounds
- 7 assists
- 1 steal
- 4 turnovers
Booker was especially effective at the free-throw line. His 16 made free throws accounted for nearly half of Phoenix’s total free throws.
His scoring also became particularly important during Phoenix’s third-quarter comeback.
The overall shooting line shows that Booker was not simply relying on volume. He made half of his field-goal attempts and combined perimeter scoring with aggressive trips to the foul line.
His seven assists also tied his individual offensive production to the wider Suns attack.
Oso Ighodaro
Oso Ighodaro produced a useful all-around performance despite scoring only five points.
His numbers included:
- 5 points
- 2-of-2 field goals
- 10 rebounds
- 5 assists
- 1 block
- 2 turnovers
The 10 rebounds led Phoenix, while his five assists were also notable for a frontcourt player.
Ighodaro’s contribution illustrates why player statistics should not be judged solely by scoring. His rebounding and passing helped Phoenix generate possessions and maintain offensive movement.
Royce O’Neale
Royce O’Neale added 14 points while shooting 4-of-8 from the field and 4-of-7 from three-point range.
He also collected nine rebounds, four assists, one block, and one steal.
His four made three-pointers were especially useful because Phoenix attempted a high number of shots from outside.
Collin Gillespie
Collin Gillespie finished with 11 points, three assists, two rebounds, and two steals.
He shot 4-of-8 from the field and 2-of-6 from three-point range.
His two steals added defensive value to a Phoenix backcourt that needed to create extra possessions during the comeback.
Ryan Fleming
Ryan Fleming scored 11 points in 16 minutes.
He finished 4-of-9 from the field, including 1-of-5 from three-point range, and added four rebounds.
His 11 points gave Phoenix another source of bench scoring during a game where the Suns needed contributions beyond Booker.
Phoenix’s Remaining Scorers
Jalen Green finished with eight points, two assists, two rebounds, two steals, and four turnovers.
Dillon Brooks scored nine points and grabbed five rebounds. He shot 4-of-13 from the field and finished with five personal fouls.
Grayson Allen contributed 10 points, two rebounds, one assist, and six turnovers while shooting 4-of-14 from the field.
Jordan Goodwin scored nine points and added five rebounds, two assists, and three steals.
Khaman Maluach played only three minutes and did not score.
The distribution shows that Phoenix received multiple secondary contributions, but Booker’s 34 points remained the defining offensive number.
Orlando Magic Player Stats
Orlando had a more balanced scoring attack.
Desmond Bane led the team with 21 points, while Jalen Suggs scored 20. Paolo Banchero added 19, Wendell Carter Jr. recorded 15, and several bench players contributed additional points.
That balance helped Orlando survive Phoenix’s third-quarter surge.
Desmond Bane
Bane led Orlando with 21 points.
His complete line was:
- 21 points
- 6-of-16 field goals
- 2-of-6 three-pointers
- 7-of-8 free throws
- 6 rebounds
- 5 assists
- 1 block
- 1 steal
- 5 turnovers
Bane’s five assists were important because Orlando did not depend entirely on one player to create offense.
His free-throw performance was also efficient. He made seven of eight attempts, contributing to Orlando’s overall advantage at the line.
The NBA highlighted Bane’s scoring in its game coverage and noted his role in Orlando’s victory.
Jalen Suggs
Jalen Suggs produced one of the most complete performances of the game.
He finished with:
- 20 points
- 6-of-11 field goals
- 2-of-5 three-pointers
- 6-of-6 free throws
- 8 rebounds
- 7 assists
- 4 steals
- 6 turnovers
Suggs’ combination of scoring, rebounding, playmaking, and defense is one of the strongest statistical stories from this matchup.
His four steals helped Orlando create defensive pressure, while eight rebounds from the guard position added to the Magic’s overall control of the glass.
Suggs also made all six of his free throws.
Paolo Banchero
Paolo Banchero recorded 19 points, nine rebounds, and eight assists.
He shot 6-of-14 from the field, made one three-pointer, and converted six of nine free throws.
His eight assists were particularly important because they show how Orlando’s offense was not dependent only on Bane’s scoring.
Banchero came close to a triple-double, finishing just one rebound and two assists short of that mark.
His 19 points also gave Orlando another reliable scoring option when Phoenix concentrated attention on the Magic’s perimeter players.
Wendell Carter Jr.
Wendell Carter Jr. was Orlando’s leading rebounder with 12 boards.
He scored 15 points while shooting 4-of-7 from the field and making six of seven free throws.
His complete line also included:
- 12 rebounds
- 2 steals
- 6 turnovers
- 4 personal fouls
Carter’s rebounding was especially valuable because Phoenix had a strong three-point shooting volume. Extra defensive rebounds helped Orlando limit second chances.
Tristan da Silva
Tristan da Silva scored nine points and collected three rebounds.
He made three of 11 field-goal attempts and three of three free throws.
His statistical line became especially important late in the game because the Magic needed reliable free-throw shooting to protect the lead.
Orlando Bench Production
Orlando’s bench also supplied meaningful scoring.
Jamal Cain scored 12 points in 20 minutes, shooting 4-of-5 from the field and 2-of-2 from three-point range.
Jett Howard added 12 points in only 14 minutes while shooting 4-of-6 from the field and 2-of-3 from three-point range.
Moritz Wagner scored four points in four minutes.
Goga Bitadze added three points, two rebounds, one assist, and one steal.
Jevon Carter did not score, finishing 0-of-6 from the field, including 0-of-5 from three-point range.
This bench distribution helped Orlando maintain offensive variety rather than forcing every possession through its main creators.
How the Game Changed After Halftime
The most revealing part of the game can be seen by dividing it into two halves.
Orlando scored 70 points in the first half.
Phoenix scored 56.
That 14-point halftime advantage placed the Suns in a difficult position.
The third quarter completely changed the momentum.
Phoenix scored 38 points.
Orlando scored 24.
The Suns therefore gained 14 points in one quarter, exactly matching Orlando’s halftime advantage.
The game entered the fourth quarter tied at 94.
That sequence is important because the final result was not a straightforward wire-to-wire performance. Orlando built a lead, Phoenix erased it, and the Magic then had to execute again in the final period.
The fourth-quarter numbers were modest:
- Phoenix: 17 points
- Orlando: 21 points
Orlando’s four-point fourth-quarter edge became the difference in the final score.
Why Free Throws Mattered So Much
One of the strongest statistical explanations for the outcome is free-throw efficiency.
Phoenix:
- 27 made
- 35 attempts
- 77%
Orlando:
- 35 made
- 41 attempts
- 85%
Orlando made eight more free throws than Phoenix.
Because the final margin was only four points, those eight additional makes were highly relevant to the result.
Booker alone made 16 free throws, showing how aggressively Phoenix attacked the basket and earned fouls. However, Orlando spread its free-throw production across several players.
Banchero made six.
Bane made seven.
Suggs made six.
Carter made six.
Those four Magic players combined for 25 made free throws.
That is a major part of the statistical explanation for Orlando’s victory.
Three-Point Shooting Tells a Different Story
Phoenix attempted 46 three-pointers.
Orlando attempted 29.
This was a significant difference in shot profile.
The Suns made 14 threes, while the Magic made 10.
Although Phoenix made four more three-pointers, the Suns still lost the game.
That is a useful reminder that three-point volume does not automatically determine the final result.
Phoenix received 42 points from three-point shots.
Orlando received 30.
Yet Orlando’s advantages at the free-throw line, inside the overall field-goal percentage, and on the glass helped offset Phoenix’s perimeter production.
For readers studying orlando magic vs phoenix suns match player stats, this is one of the most useful lessons from the box score. Looking only at three-pointers would leave out several factors that shaped the final result.
Rebounding Battle
Orlando won the overall rebounding battle 46-41.
That five-rebound advantage was not enormous, but it was meaningful.
Carter led the Magic with 12 rebounds.
Banchero had nine.
Suggs had eight.
Phoenix was led by Ighodaro with 10, while O’Neale grabbed nine.
The frontcourt and backcourt contributions were therefore relatively balanced.
Suggs collecting eight rebounds from the guard position helped Orlando keep possessions alive and prevent Phoenix from controlling the defensive glass.
Assists Were Even
Both teams finished with 24 assists.
This is an unusual point of balance in an otherwise varied statistical profile.
Phoenix’s 24 assists showed that the Suns were not simply relying on isolation scoring from Booker.
Booker himself contributed seven assists.
Ighodaro had five.
O’Neale had four.
Orlando’s 24 assists were similarly distributed.
Banchero led the Magic with eight.
Suggs had seven.
Bane had five.
That means the primary offensive creators on both teams were actively involving teammates.
The difference was not simply about passing volume. It was about what each team did with its possessions and how efficiently those possessions turned into points.
Turnovers Were a Major Concern for Orlando
Orlando committed 25 turnovers.
Phoenix committed 20.
That gave the Suns a five-turnover advantage.
Normally, this would be one of the strongest arguments in favor of the team that forced fewer mistakes.
However, Orlando still won.
The Magic compensated by forcing 13 steals while Phoenix recorded nine.
Suggs alone had four steals, while several other Orlando players contributed additional defensive pressure.
The turnover numbers therefore show an important contrast:
- Orlando made more mistakes with the ball.
- Orlando also generated more steals.
- Phoenix protected the ball better overall.
- Orlando still produced enough efficient offense to win.
This is why a complete statistical analysis should not isolate one category from the rest of the box score.
The Season Series Was Tied
The April 1 meeting was the second matchup between the teams during the 2025-26 season.
Orlando had already defeated Phoenix 113-110 in a double-overtime game on February 22, 2026.
Phoenix therefore needed the April meeting to even the season series.
Instead, Orlando won again, 115-111, according to the game data supplied for this analysis.
The two teams therefore finished the season series tied 1-1.
That context adds significance to the individual numbers because both meetings were decided by relatively small margins.
Comparing the Leading Players
A simple comparison of the top individual performers gives a useful snapshot.
| Player | Team | Points | Rebounds | Assists |
| Devin Booker | Phoenix | 34 | 3 | 7 |
| Desmond Bane | Orlando | 21 | 6 | 5 |
| Jalen Suggs | Orlando | 20 | 8 | 7 |
| Paolo Banchero | Orlando | 19 | 9 | 8 |
| Wendell Carter Jr. | Orlando | 15 | 12 | 0 |
| Oso Ighodaro | Phoenix | 5 | 10 | 5 |
| Royce O’Neale | Phoenix | 14 | 9 | 4 |
Booker’s 34 points were easily the highest individual scoring total.
However, Orlando had several players producing across multiple statistical categories.
Suggs combined 20 points with eight rebounds, seven assists, and four steals.
Banchero contributed 19 points, nine rebounds, and eight assists.
Carter supplied 15 points and 12 rebounds.
That balance helped Orlando absorb the impact of Booker’s scoring.
What the Player Stats Reveal About Both Teams
The orlando magic vs phoenix suns match player stats reveal two contrasting offensive approaches.
Phoenix had a clear high-volume scorer in Booker and leaned heavily into three-point attempts.
Orlando distributed its production among several starters and bench players while generating more free-throw attempts.
Phoenix’s offensive profile can be summarized by:
- Booker’s 34 points
- 46 three-point attempts
- 27 made free throws
- 24 team assists
- 41 rebounds
Orlando’s profile featured:
- Bane’s 21 points
- Suggs’ 20 points
- Banchero’s 19 points
- Carter’s 15 points
- 46 rebounds
- 35 made free throws
- 13 steals
Neither approach was inherently dependent on one statistic.
The final four-point margin shows how closely matched the teams were despite the different statistical paths.
Practical Takeaways for Reading NBA Box Scores
This game is a useful example for anyone trying to understand basketball statistics beyond the points column.
Do Not Judge a Player Only by Points
Booker scored 34, but Orlando still won.
Suggs scored 20, but his eight rebounds, seven assists, and four steals made his overall contribution much broader.
Ighodaro scored only five points, yet he led Phoenix in rebounds and supplied five assists.
Shooting Percentage Matters
Phoenix attempted more field goals, 88 to Orlando’s 79.
Both teams made 35 shots.
That means Orlando needed nine fewer field-goal attempts to make the same number of field goals.
The result was a better field-goal percentage for the Magic.
Free Throws Can Decide Close Games
The eight-free-throw difference was larger than the final four-point margin.
That makes foul shooting one of the clearest areas to examine when studying this matchup.
Turnovers Need Context
Orlando had 25 turnovers, but still won.
The Magic’s 13 steals helped create defensive pressure and additional opportunities.
A turnover total should therefore be examined alongside steals, shooting efficiency, rebounding, and scoring.
Where to Find Reliable NBA Game Information
For readers who want to cross-check official league information, player statistics, standings, and game details, the official NBA website is a useful primary reference.
For this article, the core game figures are based on the supplied game data for Game ID 401810954, including the final score, team totals, leading performers, and individual statistical lines.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points in the Orlando Magic vs Phoenix Suns game?
Devin Booker was the game’s leading scorer with 34 points for the Phoenix Suns.
Who led the Orlando Magic in scoring?
Desmond Bane led Orlando with 21 points. Jalen Suggs followed with 20, while Paolo Banchero scored 19.
How many points did Devin Booker score against Orlando?
Devin Booker scored 34 points. He also recorded seven assists and three rebounds.
Who led the game in rebounds?
Wendell Carter Jr. led all players with 12 rebounds for Orlando. Oso Ighodaro led Phoenix with 10.
What was the final score?
The Orlando Magic defeated the Phoenix Suns 115-111 at the Kia Center in Orlando.
What was the season series between Orlando and Phoenix?
The season series ended tied 1-1. Orlando won the April 1 meeting 115-111 after previously defeating Phoenix 113-110 in double overtime on February 22, 2026.
Conclusion
The orlando magic vs phoenix suns match player stats from April 1, 2026, show a game in which individual scoring and team balance pulled in different directions.
Devin Booker delivered the highest-scoring performance with 34 points and seven assists, while Oso Ighodaro and Royce O’Neale provided important rebounding and perimeter contributions for Phoenix.
Orlando countered with a balanced attack. Desmond Bane scored 21 points, Jalen Suggs produced 20 points with eight rebounds, seven assists, and four steals, Paolo Banchero added 19 points with nine rebounds and eight assists, and Wendell Carter Jr. collected 12 rebounds.
The team numbers explain why Orlando finished ahead despite committing more turnovers. The Magic shot 44% from the field compared with Phoenix’s 40%, won the rebounding battle 46-41, made 35 free throws compared with Phoenix’s 27, and recorded 13 steals.
Phoenix’s 38-point third quarter erased Orlando’s 14-point halftime advantage and created a tied game heading into the fourth. Orlando then scored 21 points in the final period while limiting Phoenix to 17, securing the 115-111 result.
The matchup ultimately became a useful example of why NBA player statistics are best understood as a collection of connected indicators. Points show scoring output, but rebounds, assists, steals, shooting efficiency, free throws, turnovers, and defensive activity provide the broader picture of how the game was won.