Washington Commanders vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats

The washington commanders vs philadelphia eagles match player stats reveal far more than the final score. While the Washington Commanders secured an impressive 24 to 17 victory over the Philadelphia Eagles on January 4, 2026, the box score tells a detailed story of efficient rushing, timely defensive plays, and a dominant fourth quarter. For fans, analysts, fantasy football players, and sports bettors, understanding these numbers provides valuable insight into how the game unfolded beyond the scoreboard.

Although Philadelphia entered the contest with an 11 and 6 record compared to Washington’s 5 and 12 mark, records alone did not determine the outcome. Washington executed a disciplined game plan, controlled the rushing attack, and capitalised on defensive opportunities when the game reached its most important moments. Philadelphia generated more passing yards, but turnovers, an inability to pressure the quarterback, and a scoreless final quarter proved costly.

This detailed breakdown examines every important aspect of the matchup using the official game statistics. Instead of simply listing numbers, we will explain what each statistic means, how it affected the game’s momentum, and what lessons can be taken from the performance of both teams.

Washington Commanders vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats

The official numbers highlight an interesting contrast between offensive styles. Philadelphia leaned heavily on the passing game, while Washington relied on physical rushing football, efficient quarterback play, and timely defensive execution.

Game Summary

Category	Washington Commanders	Philadelphia Eagles
Final Score	24	17
Record	5 to 12	11 to 6
Passing Yards	131	227
Rushing Yards	143	80
Passing TD	1	1
Rushing TD	2	1
Interceptions Thrown	1	1
Team Sacks	3	0
Total Defensive Tackles	55	76

The statistics immediately show why Washington emerged victorious despite recording fewer passing yards. Their rushing efficiency, defensive pressure, and fourth-quarter execution ultimately decided the contest.

Match Overview

The game remained competitive throughout the first three quarters.

Quarter by Quarter Score

Quarter	Washington	Philadelphia
First	0	0
Second	10	7
Third	0	10
Fourth	14	0
Final	24	17

Neither team scored during the opening quarter as both defences settled into the game.

Washington gained momentum before halftime, entering the break with a narrow advantage.

Philadelphia responded strongly in the third quarter, briefly taking control through improved offensive rhythm.

However, Washington completely dominated the fourth quarter, scoring two touchdowns while preventing Philadelphia from adding another point.

Quarterback Performance Analysis

Quarterback statistics often receive the most attention, but context matters as much as raw numbers.

Josh Johnson

Washington trusted veteran Josh Johnson to manage the offence efficiently rather than forcing difficult throws.

Passing Statistics

• 14 completions
• 22 attempts
• 131 passing yards
• 1 touchdown
• 1 interception
• Quarterback rating of 76.1

Although Johnson finished with relatively modest yardage, he avoided costly mistakes for most of the afternoon and allowed Washington’s rushing attack to dictate the pace.

His touchdown pass came at an important stage of the game, helping maintain offensive balance.

Tanner McKee

Philadelphia’s Tanner McKee accumulated more passing production.

Passing Statistics

• 21 completions
• 40 attempts
• 227 passing yards
• 1 touchdown
• 1 interception
• Quarterback rating of 68.9

At first glance, McKee’s higher passing total appears impressive.

However, he required almost twice as many pass attempts as Johnson to reach those numbers. Lower efficiency combined with Washington’s defensive pressure prevented Philadelphia from sustaining drives when the game mattered most.

Running Game Comparison

One of the biggest differences between the two teams appeared on the ground.

Washington’s Ground Attack

Chris Rodriguez Jr. led an effective rushing offence.

Chris Rodriguez Jr.

• 16 carries
• 65 rushing yards
• 1 rushing touchdown

Washington finished with:

• 41 rushing attempts
• 143 rushing yards
• 2 rushing touchdowns

Those numbers demonstrate a commitment to controlling possession and wearing down Philadelphia’s defensive front.

Rather than relying on explosive gains, Washington consistently produced manageable second and third downs.

Philadelphia’s Running Game

Tank Bigsby delivered a respectable individual performance.

Tank Bigsby

• 16 carries
• 75 rushing yards
• 1 touchdown

However, Philadelphia rushed only 19 times as a team.

Final rushing totals:

• 19 carries
• 80 rushing yards
• 1 touchdown

The imbalance between rushing attempts tells an important story.

Washington nearly doubled Philadelphia’s rushing volume, allowing the Commanders to control the game’s physical nature and keep the Eagles’ offence on the sideline.

Receiving Leaders

Although neither offence produced massive receiving totals, several players made important contributions.

Washington Receiving Leader

Terry McLaurin once again demonstrated why he remains Washington’s most reliable receiving option.

Statistics:

• 4 receptions
• 57 receiving yards

His ability to convert important downs helped extend drives throughout the afternoon.

Philadelphia Receiving Leader

DeVonta Smith led the Eagles.

Statistics:

• 3 receptions
• 52 receiving yards

Philadelphia spread the football among multiple receivers rather than relying heavily on one target.

Even so, Washington limited explosive passing plays throughout much of the contest.

Team Passing Comparison

Passing efficiency often matters more than total yardage.

Washington

• 14 completions
• 22 attempts
• 131 yards
• 1 touchdown
• 1 interception

Johnson completed over sixty percent of his throws while avoiding unnecessary risks.

Philadelphia

• 21 completions
• 40 attempts
• 227 yards
• 1 touchdown
• 1 interception

Philadelphia generated significantly more passing yards but required many additional attempts.

That reduced efficiency ultimately limited scoring opportunities.

Offensive Philosophy

Watching games like this reinforces an important lesson that experienced football analysts often mention.

Winning football is not always about producing the highest passing total.

Washington focused on:

• Controlling possession
• Winning at the line of scrimmage
• Running the football consistently
• Avoiding unnecessary offensive risks
• Finishing drives in the fourth quarter

Philadelphia relied more heavily on passing production, but Washington’s balanced approach proved more effective over four quarters.

Why Washington Won Despite Fewer Passing Yards

Many fans naturally assume the team with more passing yards controlled the game.

This matchup demonstrates why football is more complex.

Several factors worked in Washington’s favour.

Superior Rushing Production

Washington rushed for 143 yards compared with Philadelphia’s 80.

That difference consistently placed Washington in favourable down-and-distance situations.

Better Pass Rush

Washington recorded:

• 3 sacks
• 6 quarterback hits

Philadelphia managed:

• 0 sacks
• 4 quarterback hits

Consistent pressure disrupted Philadelphia’s offensive rhythm during critical possessions.

Fourth Quarter Execution

Championship-calibre teams often separate themselves late in games.

Washington scored 14 unanswered points in the fourth quarter while their defence completely shut down Philadelphia’s offence.

That decisive finish transformed a close contest into a deserved victory.

Defensive Performance Breakdown

Defence played a major role in determining the outcome of this contest. While offensive statistics often receive the spotlight, several defensive performances directly influenced Washington’s victory.

Washington Commanders Defensive Statistics

Team totals:

• 55 total tackles
• 33 solo tackles
• 3 sacks
• 3 tackles for loss
• 3 passes defended
• 6 quarterback hits

These numbers reflect an aggressive and disciplined defensive approach. Washington consistently pressured the quarterback and disrupted Philadelphia’s offensive timing.

A key factor was their ability to generate pressure without sacrificing coverage responsibilities. This balance forced Philadelphia into difficult passing situations throughout the game.

Philadelphia Eagles Defensive Statistics

Team totals:

• 76 total tackles
• 33 solo tackles
• 0 sacks
• 2 tackles for loss
• 5 passes defended
• 4 quarterback hits

At first glance, Philadelphia’s higher tackle total may appear positive. However, a large number of tackles often indicates that a defence spent significant time on the field.

Washington’s commitment to the running game forced the Eagles defence to defend numerous plays, leading to increased tackle opportunities but also greater fatigue as the game progressed.

Jeremy Reaves’ Game-Changing Interception

One of the most significant defensive plays came from Jeremy Reaves.

Jeremy Reaves

• 1 interception
• 28 return yards

Turnovers frequently determine close NFL games, and Reaves delivered a momentum-shifting play when Washington needed it most.

The interception not only prevented a potential Eagles scoring opportunity but also gave Washington favourable field position.

Experienced football observers understand that interceptions often create a double impact:

1. They stop the opposing offence.
2. They immediately benefit the offence taking possession.

Reaves’ contribution exemplified this principle.

Philadelphia’s Defensive Highlight

Despite the loss, Philadelphia also generated a takeaway.

Jalyx Hunt

• 1 interception

Hunt’s interception helped keep the Eagles competitive and prevented Washington from building an earlier advantage.

However, Philadelphia could not convert that turnover into enough points to alter the final outcome.

Turnover Analysis

Turnovers often tell the story behind NFL results.

Washington

• 1 interception thrown
• 3 fumbles
• 1 fumble lost

Philadelphia

• 1 interception thrown
• 0 lost fumbles

On paper, Washington’s turnover numbers appear concerning.

Losing a fumble while also throwing an interception typically creates challenges.

However, Washington compensated by dominating other critical areas, particularly rushing production and defensive pressure.

This demonstrates an important football lesson.

A team can overcome turnover issues when it consistently wins:

• Field position battles
• Time of possession
• Red-zone opportunities
• Fourth-quarter execution

Washington succeeded in all four areas.

Special Teams Analysis

Special teams rarely dominate headlines, yet hidden yardage often determines field position throughout a game.

Jake Moody’s Performance

Washington kicker Jake Moody contributed important points.

Statistics:

• 1 of 2 field goals
• Longest field goal: 56 yards
• 3 of 3 extra points
• 6 total points

The 56-yard field goal demonstrated exceptional leg strength and provided valuable scoring production.

Long-distance kicks can significantly influence momentum because they turn drives that might otherwise end empty-handed into points.

Jake Elliott’s Performance

Philadelphia kicker Jake Elliott also performed efficiently.

Statistics:

• 1 of 1 field goals
• Longest field goal: 39 yards
• 2 of 2 extra points
• 5 total points

Elliott converted every attempt but simply had fewer scoring opportunities than Moody.

Punting Comparison

Field position often begins with punting efficiency.

Tress Way

Washington’s veteran punter delivered an outstanding performance.

Statistics:

• 3 punts
• 159 yards
• 53.0-yard average
• Longest punt: 71 yards

A 53-yard average is highly impressive and consistently flipped field position in Washington’s favour.

Braden Mann

Philadelphia statistics:

• 3 punts
• 115 yards
• 38.3-yard average
• Longest punt: 44 yards

The difference between the two punters contributed to Washington’s field-position advantage.

Over several possessions, those hidden yards accumulate and create meaningful advantages.

Return Game Impact

Washington Return Leaders

Treylon Burks

• 1 kick return
• 22 yards

River Cracraft

• 1 punt return
• 1 yard

Washington did not generate explosive return plays but avoided costly mistakes.

Philadelphia Return Leaders

Will Shipley

• 2 kick returns
• 55 yards
• 27.5-yard average

Britain Covey

• 2 punt returns
• 20 yards

Philadelphia enjoyed greater production in the return game, but those gains were not enough to overcome Washington’s advantages elsewhere.

Advanced Statistical Insights

When analysing NFL games, raw totals only reveal part of the story.

Several advanced observations emerge from this matchup.

Efficiency Over Volume

Philadelphia accumulated:

• 227 passing yards
• 241 receiving yards

Washington produced:

• 131 passing yards
• 131 receiving yards

Yet Washington won.

This outcome reinforces a fundamental football principle.

Efficiency frequently matters more than volume.

A team that consistently gains productive yardage in key situations often outperforms a team that accumulates larger totals without converting them into points.

The Importance of Rushing Attempts

Washington recorded:

• 41 rushing attempts

Philadelphia recorded:

• 19 rushing attempts

That difference is enormous in modern NFL football.

A rushing advantage of this magnitude typically reflects:

• Better clock management
• More sustained drives
• Greater physical control
• Reduced pressure on the quarterback

Washington benefited from each of these factors.

Pass Rush Production

Washington:

• 3 sacks
• 6 quarterback hits

Philadelphia:

• 0 sacks
• 4 quarterback hits

Quarterback pressure remains one of the strongest indicators of defensive success.

Washington repeatedly forced Philadelphia’s offence to operate under stress.

Key Individual Performers

Best Washington Performers

Josh Johnson

Johnson did not post eye-catching numbers, but he managed the game effectively and delivered the passing touchdown Washington needed.

Chris Rodriguez Jr.

His 65 rushing yards and touchdown helped establish offensive balance.

Terry McLaurin

McLaurin remained the team’s most dependable receiving option.

Jeremy Reaves

The interception and return yardage made him one of the game’s most impactful defenders.

Tress Way

Field position frequently favoured Washington because of his punting performance.

Best Philadelphia Performers

Tanner McKee

Despite the loss, McKee led all quarterbacks in passing yardage.

Tank Bigsby

His 75 rushing yards represented one of Philadelphia’s most productive offensive contributions.

DeVonta Smith

Smith led the receiving corps and provided several important gains.

Will Shipley

His kick returns consistently improved field position.

What This Game Revealed About Washington

From an analytical perspective, this victory highlighted several strengths.

Physical Offensive Identity

Washington demonstrated a willingness to run the football regardless of situation.

Resilience

The Commanders trailed after Philadelphia’s strong third quarter but responded decisively.

Defensive Playmaking

Key defensive stops and turnovers changed momentum.

Strong Finish

Scoring 14 unanswered fourth-quarter points reflects excellent late-game execution.

What This Game Revealed About Philadelphia

The Eagles showed positive traits but also exposed areas requiring improvement.

Passing Potential

The passing game generated solid yardage.

Need for Greater Balance

The offence became too reliant on passing production.

Lack of Pass Rush

Failing to record a sack placed additional pressure on the secondary.

Fourth-Quarter Struggles

The inability to score during the final quarter ultimately determined the result.

Statistical Lessons for Fans and Analysts

The washington commanders vs philadelphia eagles match player stats offer an excellent example of why deeper analysis matters.

A quick glance at passing yardage suggests Philadelphia performed better offensively.

A complete review reveals a different reality:

• Washington ran the ball more effectively.
• Washington pressured the quarterback more consistently.
• Washington controlled field position.
• Washington executed better in the fourth quarter.
• Washington scored more touchdowns on the ground.

Those factors outweighed Philadelphia’s passing-yard advantage and produced the 24 to 17 final score.

Final Analysis of the Match

Looking at the complete statistics, this game serves as an excellent reminder that football is rarely decided by a single category. Passing yards, rushing production, turnovers, defensive pressure, and special teams all combine to influence the final result.

The washington commanders vs philadelphia eagles match player stats illustrate how Washington won by playing efficient, disciplined football rather than relying on explosive offensive numbers. Philadelphia finished with more passing yards and more total receiving yards, yet Washington consistently controlled the most valuable situations throughout the game.

The Commanders’ ability to maintain offensive balance, protect leads, and execute during the closing minutes separated them from the Eagles. Their rushing attack shortened the game, their defence produced timely pressure, and their special teams helped create favourable field position.

From an analytical standpoint, this was not a victory built on spectacular individual performances. Instead, it was a complete team effort where every phase contributed to the final outcome.

Biggest Factors Behind Washington’s Victory

Several statistical categories explain why Washington secured the win despite entering the game with a poorer season record.

Dominant Fourth Quarter

The final quarter proved decisive.

Washington scored 14 unanswered points while holding Philadelphia scoreless.

Closing games successfully is one of the strongest indicators of a well-disciplined football team, and the Commanders demonstrated exactly that.

Superior Rushing Attack

Washington recorded:

• 143 rushing yards
• 41 rushing attempts
• 2 rushing touchdowns

Philadelphia managed:

• 80 rushing yards
• 19 rushing attempts
• 1 rushing touchdown

Running the football effectively helped Washington control possession and reduce pressure on quarterback Josh Johnson.

Defensive Pressure

Washington’s defensive front consistently disrupted Philadelphia’s offence.

Key defensive totals included:

• 3 sacks
• 6 quarterback hits
• 3 tackles for loss
• 1 interception

Philadelphia failed to record a sack, allowing Washington’s offence to operate with greater comfort throughout the afternoon.

Winning Field Position

Tress Way’s punting performance repeatedly forced Philadelphia to begin drives deeper in its own territory.

Meanwhile, Jake Moody contributed six points through field goals and extra points, ensuring Washington capitalised on scoring opportunities.

Complete Team Statistical Comparison

Category	Washington Commanders	Philadelphia Eagles
Final Score	24	17
Passing Yards	131	227
Rushing Yards	143	80
Passing Touchdowns	1	1
Rushing Touchdowns	2	1
Team Sacks	3	0
Quarterback Hits	6	4
Tackles for Loss	3	2
Interceptions	1	1
Total Tackles	55	76
Fumbles Lost	1	0
Longest Field Goal	56 yards	39 yards
Punting Average	53.0 yards	38.3 yards

The table highlights an interesting balance.

Philadelphia led several volume categories, but Washington dominated many of the efficiency categories that often determine NFL games.

Individual Player Statistics Summary

Washington Commanders

Player	Performance
Josh Johnson	14 of 22, 131 passing yards, 1 TD, 1 INT
Chris Rodriguez Jr.	16 carries, 65 rushing yards, 1 TD
Terry McLaurin	4 receptions, 57 receiving yards
Jeremy Reaves	1 interception, 28 return yards
Jake Moody	1 of 2 FG, longest 56 yards
Tress Way	53.0-yard punting average

Philadelphia Eagles

Player	Performance
Tanner McKee	21 of 40, 227 passing yards, 1 TD, 1 INT
Tank Bigsby	16 carries, 75 rushing yards, 1 TD
DeVonta Smith	3 receptions, 52 receiving yards
Jalyx Hunt	1 interception
Jake Elliott	1 of 1 FG
Braden Mann	38.3-yard punting average

Lessons From This Match

This game offers several lessons for coaches, players, fantasy football managers, and fans.

Balance Wins Games

Teams do not need to dominate every offensive category to secure victories.

Washington demonstrated that controlling the rushing game and winning defensively can outweigh a passing-yard deficit.

Defence Still Matters

Modern NFL discussions often focus on passing offences, but defensive pressure remains equally valuable.

Washington’s three sacks and consistent quarterback pressure limited Philadelphia’s effectiveness during critical possessions.

Finishing Strong Is Essential

The Commanders entered the fourth quarter trailing but finished the game with authority.

Strong late-game execution often separates winning teams from losing ones, regardless of earlier statistics.

Efficiency Beats Volume

Philadelphia accumulated more passing yards, yet Washington converted its opportunities more effectively.

Football is ultimately decided by points rather than total yardage.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Washington Commanders vs Philadelphia Eagles game?

The Washington Commanders defeated the Philadelphia Eagles by a final score of 24 to 17 on January 4, 2026.

Who was the leading passer in the game?

Tanner McKee led all quarterbacks with 227 passing yards, while Josh Johnson threw for 131 yards and one touchdown for Washington.

Which player led the rushing attack?

Tank Bigsby led all rushers with 75 yards, while Chris Rodriguez Jr. scored a rushing touchdown and finished with 65 rushing yards for Washington.

Who recorded an interception?

Jeremy Reaves intercepted one pass for Washington and returned it 28 yards. Jalyx Hunt also recorded an interception for Philadelphia.

Why did Washington win despite fewer passing yards?

Washington controlled the rushing game, generated three sacks, played stronger defence in the fourth quarter, and scored two rushing touchdowns. Those advantages outweighed Philadelphia’s passing-yard lead.

Where can I verify the official game statistics?

The official box score is available on the ESPN box score, which provides the complete player and team statistics used in this analysis.

Conclusion

The washington commanders vs philadelphia eagles match player stats demonstrate that winning football depends on far more than passing production. Washington combined an effective rushing attack, disciplined quarterback play, timely defensive stops, quality special teams, and an outstanding fourth quarter to earn a deserved 24 to 17 victory. Although Philadelphia produced more passing yards, the Commanders excelled in the areas that most directly influence the outcome of NFL games, including rushing efficiency, quarterback pressure, and late-game execution. For anyone analysing this matchup, the statistics provide a clear picture of how balanced team football can overcome advantages in individual offensive categories.