Los Angeles Rams vs Atlanta Falcons Match Player Stats
The los angeles rams vs atlanta falcons match player stats tell the story of one of the most dramatic games of the 2025 NFL regular season. Atlanta defeated Los Angeles 27-24 at Mercedes-Benz Stadium on December 29, 2025, after building a 21-0 halftime lead and then surviving a furious Rams comeback. The final score was close, but the underlying numbers reveal a much more complicated game. Los Angeles produced 363 total yards to Atlanta’s 345, yet the Falcons controlled the ground game, forced three turnovers, and received a career-best rushing performance from Bijan Robinson.
For anyone researching the los angeles rams vs atlanta falcons match player stats, the most important point is that the box score does not tell just one story. Matthew Stafford threw for 269 yards and two touchdowns, but three interceptions changed the game. Kirk Cousins produced only 126 passing yards, yet he avoided turnovers and made enough important throws to keep Atlanta in control. Robinson was the standout offensive player with 195 rushing yards, a rushing touchdown, 34 receiving yards, and another touchdown through the air.
The Rams actually won the yardage battle and dominated the second half. Atlanta still won because its early defensive pressure, explosive rushing plays, and turnover margin created a lead that Los Angeles almost erased but could not overcome.
Game Overview
The matchup took place at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta and finished with the Falcons ahead 27-24. The Rams entered the contest at 11-5, while Atlanta was 7-9. The result was significant because Los Angeles was already headed toward the postseason, while Atlanta had been eliminated from playoff contention but continued playing competitively late in the season.
Final Score by Quarter
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| Los Angeles Rams | 0 | 0 | 17 | 7 | 24 |
| Atlanta Falcons | 7 | 14 | 3 | 3 | 27 |
The scoring pattern is one of the clearest ways to understand the game.
Atlanta led 7-0 after the first quarter and extended that advantage to 21-0 by halftime. Los Angeles then exploded for 17 points in the third quarter and added another touchdown in the fourth to tie the game at 24.
That comeback made the final three-point margin misleading. For most of the opening half, Atlanta controlled the game.
The Falcons ultimately secured the victory when Zane Gonzalez converted a 51-yard field goal with 21 seconds remaining.
los angeles rams vs atlanta falcons match player stats: Quarterback Comparison
The quarterback statistics provide perhaps the biggest contrast between individual production and winning football.
Matthew Stafford
Matthew Stafford finished with:
- 22 completions on 38 attempts
- 269 passing yards
- 2 passing touchdowns
- 3 interceptions
- 7.1 yards per attempt
- 41.0 QBR
- 64.5 passer rating
- 3 sacks for 21 yards
Stafford’s final yardage total looks respectable, and his two touchdown passes helped lead the second-half comeback. However, the three interceptions were decisive.
Two of Stafford’s interceptions came during the first half. Jessie Bates III returned one 34 yards for a touchdown, while rookie safety Xavier Watts intercepted another pass. Watts later added a second interception in the fourth quarter.
The first interception was particularly damaging because it immediately became points. A quarterback can sometimes recover from an interception if the defense holds the opponent to a field goal or forces a punt. A pick-six is different. It creates a 14-point swing in one play.
Stafford also deserves credit for the comeback. After the Rams fell behind 21-0, he continued attacking the Falcons defense and helped Los Angeles produce 17 third-quarter points.
He threw touchdown passes to Terrance Ferguson and Puka Nacua during the comeback, and the latter tied the game 24-24 with 2:46 remaining.
So the correct assessment is not simply that Stafford played poorly. His performance was volatile. The turnovers were costly, but his second-half passing helped transform a seemingly finished game into a one-possession contest.
Kirk Cousins
Kirk Cousins finished with:
- 13 completions on 20 attempts
- 126 passing yards
- 1 passing touchdown
- 0 interceptions
- 6.3 yards per attempt
- 71.0 QBR
- 99.2 passer rating
Cousins did not come close to Stafford’s passing yardage, but he played a cleaner turnover-free game.
His most important contribution was efficiency within Atlanta’s offensive plan. The Falcons did not need Cousins to throw 35 or 40 passes because Robinson was dominating the ground game.
Cousins also connected with Robinson for a four-yard touchdown in the first quarter, giving Atlanta its initial 7-0 advantage.
This is an important lesson when interpreting player statistics. More passing yards do not automatically mean better quarterback play. Stafford had 143 more passing yards than Cousins, but Atlanta won the game.
Bijan Robinson Was the Game’s Defining Player
If one player explains why Atlanta won, it is Bijan Robinson.
Robinson rushed 22 times for 195 yards and one touchdown. He also caught five passes for 34 yards and a touchdown, giving him 229 total yards from scrimmage.
His rushing average was an outstanding 8.9 yards per carry.
The most memorable play came late in the first half.
Robinson took a handoff and broke loose for a 93-yard touchdown run. The play extended Atlanta’s lead to 21-0 and was the longest rushing touchdown in Falcons history. It was also the longest rushing play of Robinson’s career at that point.
That single play illustrates why raw rushing totals sometimes need context.
Robinson’s 195 yards did not come from simply grinding out four or five yards at a time. He combined consistent production with a massive explosive play. Remove the 93-yard touchdown, and his remaining 21 carries produced 102 yards, which is still an excellent 4.9 yards per carry.
That is a much more useful way to evaluate his performance.
Robinson’s Complete Statistical Impact
| Category | Stat |
| Rushing attempts | 22 |
| Rushing yards | 195 |
| Rushing average | 8.9 |
| Longest run | 93 yards |
| Rushing touchdowns | 1 |
| Receptions | 5 |
| Receiving yards | 34 |
| Receiving touchdowns | 1 |
| Total scrimmage yards | 229 |
| Total touchdowns | 2 |
Robinson’s 229 scrimmage yards were not just impressive for this game. The performance also contributed to a record-setting 2025 season for the running back. The Falcons reported that he finished the game with the most rushing yards by a Falcon in a game since Michael Turner ran for 208 yards in 2008, also against the Rams.
Kyren Williams Provided a Strong Counter for Los Angeles
Kyren Williams led the Rams in rushing with 13 carries for 92 yards.
His 7.1 yards-per-carry average was excellent, and his longest run covered 22 yards.
The contrast between Williams and Robinson is interesting. Williams was highly efficient, but Atlanta gave Robinson more volume and received a much larger total impact from its running back.
Los Angeles finished with 115 rushing yards on 20 attempts, averaging 5.8 yards per carry. Atlanta finished with 219 rushing yards on 33 attempts at 6.6 yards per carry.
The difference was 104 rushing yards.
That is enormous.
It also explains why Atlanta could keep its passing workload relatively modest. When a team can run for 219 yards, it does not need to win the game through a high-volume passing attack.
Rams Receiving Production
The Rams’ passing game eventually became a major part of the comeback.
Xavier Smith led the team in receiving yardage from the supplied game data, finishing with four receptions for 67 yards. His average was 16.8 yards per reception, and he produced a 36-yard reception.
More broadly, Stafford’s 269 passing yards show that Los Angeles was able to move the ball through the air despite the early turnovers.
Puka Nacua was particularly important late in the contest.
Nacua caught an 11-yard touchdown pass from Stafford with 2:46 remaining in the fourth quarter, tying the game at 24-24. That score completed a comeback from a 21-point deficit.
The Rams also appeared to have a potential 41-yard touchdown connection between Stafford and Nacua during the fourth-quarter comeback, but the play was erased by a holding penalty on D.J. Humphries.
That sequence matters because it demonstrates how small execution details can decide an NFL game.
The Rams were not simply beaten by talent. They lost opportunities.
Falcons Receiving Production
Atlanta’s passing volume was considerably lower.
The Falcons completed 13 passes for 126 yards, compared with Los Angeles completing 22 passes for 269 yards.
David Sills V was listed as Atlanta’s receiving leader in the supplied data, with three catches for 37 yards.
However, the most important receiving contribution came from Robinson. His five receptions for 34 yards and a receiving touchdown made him the central figure in Atlanta’s offensive production.
This is another reason traditional receiving leaderboards can sometimes miss the bigger picture.
A running back who catches five passes may not lead the team in receiving yards, but if those catches extend drives, create favorable matchups, or produce touchdowns, his overall impact can exceed that of a conventional wide receiver.
Team Offensive Statistics
The broader numbers provide a useful explanation for the final result.
| Statistic | Rams | Falcons |
| Total yards | 363 | 345 |
| Passing yards | 248 | 126 |
| Rushing yards | 115 | 219 |
| Total plays | 61 | 53 |
| Yards per play | 6.0 | 6.5 |
| Time of possession | 30:15 | 29:45 |
| Turnovers | 3 | 0 |
Los Angeles gained 18 more total yards and held the ball slightly longer. Yet Atlanta averaged more yards per play and, most importantly, committed no turnovers.
This is one of the strongest examples of why looking only at total yardage can produce the wrong conclusion.
The Rams gained more yards overall, but Atlanta converted its opportunities more effectively.
The Turnover Battle Decided the Game
The turnover margin was Atlanta +3.
That statistic is arguably more important than the 18-yard advantage Los Angeles had in total offense.
Stafford threw three interceptions.
Atlanta threw none.
The Falcons converted one of those interceptions directly into a touchdown through Jessie Bates III’s 34-yard return. Xavier Watts added two interceptions of his own.
The timing of those turnovers was even more damaging for Los Angeles.
Jessie Bates III’s Pick-Six
Bates intercepted Stafford in the second quarter and returned the ball 34 yards for a touchdown.
That made the score 14-0.
It was not just a defensive statistic. It was an immediate scoring possession without Atlanta needing to run an offensive play.
Xavier Watts’ Two Interceptions
Watts had two interceptions.
His first came in the second quarter and was followed immediately by Robinson’s 93-yard touchdown run.
His second arrived in the fourth quarter when Los Angeles was attempting to convert a fourth down from the Atlanta 27-yard line.
Watts returned that interception 32 yards.
The second interception was especially important because the Rams were already in comeback mode.
Instead of potentially scoring points, Los Angeles handed Atlanta another possession.
Defensive Player Stats Tell Another Story
Atlanta’s defense recorded:
- 60 total tackles
- 38 solo tackles
- 3 sacks
- 4 tackles for loss
- 8 passes defended
- 5 quarterback hits
- 1 defensive touchdown
Los Angeles recorded:
- 75 total tackles
- 27 solo tackles
- 0 sacks
- 3 tackles for loss
- 1 pass defended
- 7 quarterback hits
- 1 defensive touchdown
The Rams’ defensive touchdown came from Jared Verse.
After Atlanta’s third-quarter field-goal attempt was blocked, Verse recovered the loose opportunity and returned it 76 yards for a touchdown. That play cut Atlanta’s advantage to 24-17.
It was arguably the most important defensive play of Los Angeles’ comeback.
Atlanta’s defense, however, created more traditional disruption. Three sacks, eight passes defended, and three interceptions gave the Falcons a decisive advantage in high-impact defensive plays.
Jared Verse and the Special Teams Swing
The 76-yard return by Jared Verse deserves special attention because it was technically a defensive score created through a special teams mistake.
Atlanta attempted a 37-yard field goal.
Los Angeles blocked it.
Verse then returned the blocked kick 76 yards for a touchdown.
That sequence turned what could have been three Atlanta points into seven Los Angeles points, creating a 10-point swing.
It also changed the emotional tone of the game.
Atlanta had led 24-3 earlier in the third quarter. After the block-and-return touchdown, the score was 24-17.
Suddenly, the Falcons were under pressure.
Zane Gonzalez Delivered When It Mattered Most
Zane Gonzalez had an uneven night by pure field-goal percentage.
He converted two of three field-goal attempts, including a 56-yarder and the decisive 51-yarder.
His final kick came with 21 seconds remaining and gave Atlanta a 27-24 lead.
The missed attempt earlier in the game became less important because Atlanta’s defense and offense eventually created another scoring opportunity.
This is a good example of why kickers should be evaluated by game context rather than percentage alone.
A 2-for-3 performance can still be decisive when the successful kicks come from long distance and one directly determines the final result.
How the Game Changed in the Second Half
The first half and second half almost looked like two different games.
Atlanta controlled the opening half.
Los Angeles controlled much of the comeback.
The Rams scored 17 points in the third quarter. That included a field goal, a touchdown pass to Terrance Ferguson, and Verse’s defensive touchdown.
The fourth quarter continued the momentum.
Stafford eventually found Nacua for an 11-yard touchdown to make it 24-24.
At that point, the Falcons had surrendered a 21-point advantage.
Yet Atlanta did not collapse.
Cousins completed a key pass to Kyle Pitts during the final drive, and Robinson added a 10-yard run that helped move Atlanta into field-goal range. Gonzalez then converted from 51 yards.
That final sequence is important because it shows that Atlanta’s victory was not purely about surviving.
The Falcons produced enough offense after the Rams tied the game to create one final scoring opportunity.
What the Player Statistics Reveal That the Score Does Not
The los angeles rams vs atlanta falcons match player stats reveal several deeper lessons.
1. Passing yardage was not the deciding factor
Stafford threw for 269 yards.
Cousins threw for 126.
Atlanta still won.
The difference was that Cousins avoided interceptions while Robinson created explosive rushing production.
2. Explosive plays overwhelmed overall efficiency
Robinson’s 93-yard touchdown was the obvious example.
One play produced nearly half of the yardage needed for a typical scoring drive and immediately changed the scoreboard.
3. Turnovers outweighed yardage
Los Angeles gained more total yards but lost the turnover battle 3-0.
That is the statistical backbone of the result.
4. Atlanta’s rushing attack changed the structure of the game
The Falcons ran 33 times for 219 yards.
That allowed them to keep Stafford’s offense on the sideline and reduce the burden on Cousins.
5. The Rams’ comeback was real, not cosmetic
It would be inaccurate to say Los Angeles simply scored late after Atlanta relaxed.
The Rams produced 17 third-quarter points, tied the game at 24, and had legitimate opportunities to win.
The comeback was a major part of the game’s story.
A Note About Reading Box Scores Correctly
One issue that often causes confusion when researching NFL statistics is mixing passing totals with receiving totals.
Stafford’s 269 passing yards are not the Rams’ receiving yards for one player. They represent the quarterback’s completed passing production.
Likewise, a team receiving table should not be interpreted as though every passing yard belongs to one receiver.
For this matchup, the safest approach is to separate the statistics into four categories:
- Quarterback passing
- Individual rushing
- Individual receiving
- Team offense and defense
That makes the numbers easier to interpret and prevents common box-score mistakes.
The Most Important Individual Performances
Bijan Robinson
Robinson was the clear offensive standout.
His 195 rushing yards, 34 receiving yards, and two total touchdowns gave him 229 scrimmage yards.
Xavier Watts
Watts recorded two interceptions and played a major role in preventing the Rams from completing their comeback.
Jessie Bates III
Bates produced a 34-yard pick-six that helped establish Atlanta’s early advantage.
Matthew Stafford
Stafford’s three interceptions hurt the Rams, but his 269 passing yards and two touchdowns helped fuel a remarkable comeback.
Kyren Williams
Williams averaged 7.1 yards per carry and provided the Rams with an efficient rushing option despite limited volume.
Jared Verse
Verse’s 76-yard return of a blocked field goal for a touchdown was one of the most unusual and influential plays of the night.
Zane Gonzalez
Gonzalez’s 51-yard field goal with 21 seconds left ultimately decided the contest.
Why Atlanta Won Despite Being Outgained
The final numbers make the result look unusual.
Los Angeles had:
- More total yards
- More passing yards
- More plays
- Slightly more possession time
Atlanta had:
- More rushing yards
- More yards per play
- Zero turnovers
- Three takeaways
- A stronger first half
- The game’s most productive individual runner
The difference was efficiency in high-value moments.
Atlanta turned interceptions into points and field position. Robinson created explosive plays. The defense forced Stafford into difficult situations. Gonzalez then delivered the final kick.
That combination was enough.
What Los Angeles Can Learn From the Performance
The Rams’ biggest issue was not a lack of offensive ability.
It was the cost of mistakes.
A team can overcome one turnover.
Three turnovers are much harder to overcome, especially when one becomes a defensive touchdown and another is followed by a 93-yard touchdown run.
The Rams also needed a stronger defensive response to Atlanta’s rushing attack.
Giving up 219 rushing yards meant Atlanta could control the game without requiring Cousins to throw frequently.
There were positives, though.
The Rams showed tremendous resilience.
A 21-0 halftime deficit became a 24-24 game.
That tells us the team had the offensive ability and competitive character to recover. The problem was that the early deficit left almost no margin for error during the final minutes.
What Atlanta Can Take From the Performance
Atlanta’s victory demonstrated the value of complementary football.
The offense did not need to produce 300 passing yards.
The defense did not need to shut the Rams out for four quarters.
Special teams did not have to be perfect.
Instead, different units produced at different moments.
The offense established the early lead.
The defense forced turnovers.
Robinson delivered explosive runs.
Special teams produced both a missed opportunity and, ultimately, the winning field goal.
That balance is why Atlanta survived after surrendering the 21-point advantage.
A Practical Way to Analyze NFL Player Stats
If you are comparing players from this game or evaluating similar NFL matchups, do not stop at the headline numbers.
Use this five-step approach:
Step 1: Check volume
Look at carries, targets, pass attempts, and defensive opportunities.
A player with 20 carries has a different statistical workload from one with five.
Step 2: Check efficiency
Compare yards per carry, yards per reception, yards per attempt, and other efficiency measures.
Williams’ 7.1 rushing average, for example, shows that his 92 yards came on relatively efficient production.
Step 3: Find explosive plays
Long runs, long receptions, interceptions returned for touchdowns, and blocked-kick returns can dramatically alter the outcome.
Robinson’s 93-yard touchdown is the clearest example from this matchup.
Step 4: Track turnovers
Turnovers often have more direct scoring impact than modest differences in yardage.
Atlanta’s 3-0 turnover advantage was central to the result.
Step 5: Put the statistics into game context
Ask when the production happened.
A touchdown during a 21-point lead and a touchdown that ties the game with 2:46 remaining are both worth seven points, but their competitive context is very different.
Key Takeaways From the Match
The biggest conclusions from the game are straightforward.
First, Bijan Robinson was the dominant individual offensive performer.
Second, Matthew Stafford’s three interceptions were the defining negative statistic for Los Angeles.
Third, Atlanta’s 219 rushing yards gave the Falcons a reliable offensive foundation.
Fourth, Xavier Watts and Jessie Bates III made game-changing defensive plays.
Fifth, the Rams’ 21-point comeback proved that their offense could recover from a disastrous opening half.
Finally, Zane Gonzalez’s 51-yard field goal turned a dramatic comeback into an Atlanta victory.
The box score therefore tells a more nuanced story than the final score alone.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Rams vs Falcons game in 2025?
The Atlanta Falcons defeated the Los Angeles Rams 27-24 on December 29, 2025, at Mercedes-Benz Stadium.
How many yards did Matthew Stafford throw for against Atlanta?
Matthew Stafford completed 22 of 38 passes for 269 yards, two touchdowns, and three interceptions.
How many rushing yards did Bijan Robinson have against the Rams?
Bijan Robinson rushed for 195 yards on 22 carries, averaging 8.9 yards per carry. He also scored one rushing touchdown.
How many touchdowns did Bijan Robinson score?
Robinson scored two total touchdowns. He scored once on a 93-yard run and once on a four-yard reception from Kirk Cousins.
How many interceptions did Matthew Stafford throw?
Stafford threw three interceptions. Xavier Watts recorded two of them, while Jessie Bates III recorded the other and returned it for a touchdown.
What was the final score of the Rams vs Falcons game?
Atlanta defeated Los Angeles 27-24. The Falcons led 21-0 at halftime, while the Rams tied the game 24-24 in the fourth quarter before Atlanta kicked the winning field goal with 21 seconds remaining.
Conclusion
The los angeles rams vs atlanta falcons match player stats show why NFL games cannot be judged by one number.
Los Angeles finished with more total yards and significantly more passing production. Stafford threw for 269 yards and two touchdowns, while Kyren Williams averaged 7.1 yards per carry. The Rams also produced a remarkable second-half comeback that erased a 21-point deficit.
Atlanta, however, controlled the statistics that mattered most.
The Falcons ran for 219 yards, averaged 6.6 yards per carry, committed no turnovers, and intercepted Stafford three times. Bijan Robinson delivered 229 scrimmage yards and two touchdowns, while Xavier Watts and Jessie Bates III created critical defensive plays.
The final 27-24 result was therefore not simply an upset caused by one lucky play. It was the result of Atlanta establishing an early advantage, exploiting turnovers, producing explosive rushing plays, and responding after Los Angeles completed its comeback.
The most useful lesson from this game is that player statistics become far more meaningful when they are connected to timing, efficiency, field position, turnovers, and game situation. That is the difference between simply reading a box score and actually understanding what happened on the field.
