Atlanta Hawks vs Denver Nuggets Match Player Stats
The atlanta hawks vs denver nuggets match player stats from January 10, 2026, tell a much clearer story than the final score alone. Atlanta defeated Denver 110-87 at Ball Arena, turning a competitive first half into a dominant second-half finish. The Hawks shot 49% from the field, made 16 three-pointers, committed only six turnovers, and recorded 14 steals. Denver, despite winning the rebounding battle 44-40 and shooting 80% from the free-throw line, struggled to maintain offensive efficiency and gave the ball away 19 times.
Jalen Johnson led Atlanta with 29 points, while Nickeil Alexander-Walker added 22. Dyson Daniels produced one of the most complete statistical performances of the game with 17 points, 11 rebounds, 10 assists, and four steals. Onyeka Okongwu also contributed 15 points, five rebounds, five assists, two steals, and a block.
For Denver, Peyton Watson was the leading scorer and rebounder with 25 points and 11 rebounds. Aaron Gordon added 14 points, while Zeke Nnaji scored 12. However, Denver’s 19 turnovers and 42% shooting made it difficult to keep pace with Atlanta.
This game was also important in the season series. Atlanta’s victory tied the matchup at 1-1 after Denver had previously beaten the Hawks 134-133 on December 6, 2025.
Atlanta Hawks vs Denver Nuggets Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The January 10 meeting took place at Ball Arena in Denver, Colorado, with an announced attendance of 19,650. Atlanta entered the game with a 19-21 overall record and a 12-10 record on the road. Denver entered at 25-13 and had a 10-6 home record.
The final score was:
Atlanta Hawks 110, Denver Nuggets 87
The scoring pattern is especially useful when analyzing how the game developed.
| Quarter | Atlanta Hawks | Denver Nuggets |
| 1st | 30 | 28 |
| 2nd | 28 | 22 |
| 3rd | 16 | 25 |
| 4th | 36 | 12 |
| Final | 110 | 87 |
Atlanta led 58-50 at halftime. Denver responded in the third quarter by outscoring Atlanta 25-16, cutting into the deficit. That made the fourth quarter particularly important.
Instead of allowing Denver to complete the comeback, Atlanta produced its strongest offensive quarter of the night, scoring 36 points while holding the Nuggets to just 12.
That 24-point fourth-quarter margin essentially decided the game.
The box score also shows a major contrast in ball security. Atlanta committed only six turnovers, while Denver committed 19. That 13-turnover difference gave the Hawks substantially more opportunities to control possessions and create defensive pressure.
Jalen Johnson Leads Atlanta With 29 Points
Jalen Johnson was Atlanta’s leading scorer, finishing with 29 points. He also contributed nine rebounds, six assists, one steal, and one block.
His overall line was:
- 29 points
- 9 rebounds
- 6 assists
- 1 steal
- 1 block
- +11 plus/minus
The scoring total was the highest individual mark for either team except Peyton Watson’s 25 points came second. Johnson’s contribution was not limited to scoring, though.
Nine rebounds and six assists show that his impact extended into other areas of the offense. Atlanta did not need him to operate strictly as a scorer. He also helped generate opportunities for teammates and contributed on the glass.
His +11 plus/minus indicates that Atlanta had a positive scoring margin during his time on the floor.
From a box-score perspective, Johnson was one of the central pieces behind Atlanta’s 23-point victory.
Dyson Daniels Records a Triple-Double
Dyson Daniels produced one of the most notable statistical lines of the game.
He finished with:
- 17 points
- 11 rebounds
- 10 assists
- 4 steals
That gave Daniels a triple-double while also making him Atlanta’s leading rebounder, leading assist provider, and leading steals contributor.
His four steals were particularly important in a game where Atlanta generated 14 steals as a team.
Daniels also finished with a +25 plus/minus, the second-highest figure among the listed Atlanta starters behind Onyeka Okongwu’s +32.
The combination of scoring, rebounding, playmaking, and defense makes Daniels’ performance stand out when looking beyond the leading scorer.
A player can lead a team in points without controlling several parts of a game. Daniels affected multiple statistical categories at once.
His 10 assists were also important because Atlanta finished with 31 team assists. That means Daniels accounted for a substantial portion of the Hawks’ recorded assists.
Nickeil Alexander-Walker Adds 22 Points
Nickeil Alexander-Walker was Atlanta’s second-leading scorer with 22 points.
His complete listed line included:
- 22 points
- 8 rebounds
- 3 assists
- 2 steals
- +9 plus/minus
The eight rebounds are notable for a player whose primary contribution in this game was scoring.
Alexander-Walker also recorded two steals, contributing to Atlanta’s strong defensive activity. His +9 plus/minus shows that Atlanta maintained a positive scoring margin during his listed minutes.
Together, Johnson, Alexander-Walker, and Daniels accounted for 68 of Atlanta’s 110 points.
That means these three players supplied more than half of the Hawks’ total scoring.
Onyeka Okongwu Provides an Efficient All-Around Line
Onyeka Okongwu finished with 15 points, five rebounds, five assists, two steals, and one block.
His listed line was:
15 PTS, 5 REB, 5 AST, 2 STL, 1 BLK, +32
The +32 figure was the highest plus/minus among the listed Atlanta starters.
Okongwu’s statistical contribution was balanced. He did not lead the team in any major offensive category, but he contributed across scoring, rebounding, passing, steals, and blocks.
That type of production matters when examining why Atlanta was able to build such a large fourth-quarter advantage.
The Hawks did not depend on one statistical category. Their leading players contributed in different ways, and the team collectively finished with 31 assists and 14 steals.
Vit Krejci’s Defensive Contribution
Vit Krejci did not score in the game, but his box-score line was not empty.
He recorded:
- 0 points
- 0 rebounds
- 1 assist
- 2 steals
- 2 blocks
- +7 plus/minus
The two steals and two blocks are particularly notable considering that he finished without a point.
This is a useful reminder when evaluating atlanta hawks vs denver nuggets match player stats. A player’s contribution cannot always be measured by points alone.
Krejci’s defensive statistics provided value even without offensive scoring.
Peyton Watson Leads Denver’s Scoring
Peyton Watson was Denver’s leading scorer and rebounder.
He finished with:
- 25 points
- 11 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 3 steals
- 1 block
- +2 plus/minus
Watson was the only Denver player listed with at least 20 points.
His 25 points represented a significant portion of Denver’s 87-point total. He also tied Atlanta’s Dyson Daniels for the game-high in rebounds with 11.
Watson’s four assists and three steals added additional value, while his one block gave him a defensive contribution as well.
Despite his individual production, Denver’s overall offense struggled. The Nuggets finished with 30 made field goals on 72 attempts, compared with Atlanta’s 46 made field goals on 94 attempts.
Aaron Gordon Scores 14 Points
Aaron Gordon was Denver’s second-leading scorer with 14 points.
Although the supplied data does not provide a full statistical line for Gordon, his 14 points placed him behind Watson and ahead of the other listed Denver scorers.
The larger issue for Denver was not simply the lack of a second 20-point scorer. The team’s overall offensive output was limited to 87 points.
When a team shoots 42% from the field and turns the ball over 19 times, individual scoring becomes more difficult to translate into a competitive team total.
Zeke Nnaji Adds 12 Points
Zeke Nnaji scored 12 points for Denver.
His contribution helped give the Nuggets another double-digit scorer, but Denver still lacked the collective offensive production needed to match Atlanta.
The Hawks had three players score at least 17 points among the listed starters, while Denver’s leading individual scorer had 25 points and the next listed scorer had 14.
That difference in scoring distribution was one part of the larger statistical contrast between the teams.
Denver’s Starting Lineup Statistics
Denver’s listed starters produced the following numbers:
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Other |
| Hunter Tyson | 10 | 4 | 4 | 1 steal, +5 |
| DaRon Holmes II | 6 | 1 | 0 | -5 |
| Jalen Pickett | 7 | 6 | 6 | 1 steal, -12 |
| Christian Braun | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 block, -8 |
| Peyton Watson | 25 | 11 | 4 | 3 steals, 1 block, +2 |
Watson clearly stood out as the leading scorer and rebounder from the group.
Jalen Pickett’s six assists tied him for Denver’s team-high in assists. His six rebounds also gave him a useful contribution outside of scoring.
Hunter Tyson added 10 points, four rebounds, and four assists.
Christian Braun did not score but contributed four rebounds and one block.
DaRon Holmes II finished with six points and one rebound.
The plus/minus figures also show that several Denver starters were on the negative side during the game, including Pickett at -12 and Braun at -8.
Atlanta’s Starting Lineup Statistics
Atlanta’s listed starters had a broader statistical impact.
| Player | Points | Rebounds | Assists | Other |
| Onyeka Okongwu | 15 | 5 | 5 | 2 steals, 1 block, +32 |
| Jalen Johnson | 29 | 9 | 6 | 1 steal, 1 block, +11 |
| Nickeil Alexander-Walker | 22 | 8 | 3 | 2 steals, +9 |
| Vit Krejci | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 steals, 2 blocks, +7 |
| Dyson Daniels | 17 | 11 | 10 | 4 steals, +25 |
This group demonstrates how differently the game was distributed statistically.
Johnson led scoring.
Daniels recorded the triple-double.
Okongwu had the highest listed plus/minus.
Alexander-Walker provided secondary scoring and rebounding.
Krejci contributed defensively despite scoring zero points.
That variety helped Atlanta build a more balanced statistical profile.
Shooting Efficiency Created a Major Difference
One of the clearest differences in the game came from field-goal shooting.
Atlanta made 46 of 94 field-goal attempts, which was 49%.
Denver made 30 of 72, or 42%.
The seven-percentage-point difference matters because Atlanta also attempted more shots.
The Hawks therefore combined volume with better shooting efficiency.
Atlanta’s three-point shooting was also strong. The team made 16 of 43 attempts from beyond the arc, a 37% rate.
Denver made 11 of 32 three-point attempts, or 34%.
Neither team was overwhelmingly dominant from three-point range, but Atlanta made five more three-pointers.
Those additional made threes accounted for 15 points of scoring difference by themselves.
Free Throws Tell a Different Story
Denver was clearly more efficient from the free-throw line.
The Nuggets made 16 of 20 free throws, good for 80%.
Atlanta made only 2 of 4, shooting 50%.
This is one area where Denver had the statistical advantage.
However, free-throw efficiency alone could not overcome the broader differences in field goals, three-pointers, turnovers, and steals.
Atlanta actually attempted only four free throws during the game.
That means the Hawks generated most of their 110 points through field goals and three-point shots rather than frequent trips to the line.
Denver’s 16 made free throws contributed meaningfully to its scoring total, but the Nuggets still finished 23 points behind.
Rebounding Favored Denver
Denver won the overall rebounding battle.
The Nuggets recorded 44 rebounds compared with Atlanta’s 40.
Peyton Watson led Denver with 11 rebounds, while Dyson Daniels also recorded 11 for Atlanta.
Jalen Johnson added nine rebounds, and Nickeil Alexander-Walker had eight.
The rebounding numbers show that Denver did not lose because Atlanta dominated the glass.
In fact, Denver collected four more rebounds.
This is an important part of understanding the game because it prevents an overly simple explanation of the final score.
The Hawks’ advantage came from other areas, especially shooting, ball security, assists, and defensive activity.
Atlanta’s 31 Assists Showed Strong Ball Movement
Atlanta finished with 31 assists.
Denver recorded 22.
The nine-assist difference provides useful context for Atlanta’s 49% shooting.
The Hawks were not simply making difficult individual shots. Their high assist total indicates that a large amount of their offense involved creating scoring opportunities for teammates.
Dyson Daniels led Atlanta with 10 assists.
Jalen Johnson followed with six, while Onyeka Okongwu contributed five.
Those three players alone accounted for 21 of Atlanta’s 31 team assists.
That distribution illustrates how multiple players participated in creating offense.
Turnovers Were One of the Biggest Differences
The turnover numbers were among the strongest indicators of why Atlanta won.
Atlanta committed:
6 turnovers
Denver committed:
19 turnovers
The difference was 13 turnovers.
That is a substantial gap over a single game.
Turnovers can affect both sides of the game. They remove offensive possessions for the team committing them and can create transition opportunities for the opponent.
Atlanta also recorded 14 steals, compared with six for Denver.
That means the Hawks were active defensively while simultaneously protecting the ball better on offense.
The combination of six turnovers by Atlanta and 19 by Denver is one of the clearest statistical explanations for the 23-point final margin.
Atlanta’s Defense Created Extra Pressure
The Hawks recorded 14 steals and six blocks.
Denver recorded six steals and two blocks.
Atlanta therefore led in both categories.
Dyson Daniels accounted for four steals by himself.
Nickeil Alexander-Walker and Onyeka Okongwu each recorded two steals, while Vit Krejci also had two.
That defensive activity was not concentrated in a single player.
Instead, several Hawks contributed to the team’s ability to disrupt Denver’s possessions.
The 14 steals also align with Denver’s 19 turnovers, although steals do not account for every turnover.
The Fourth Quarter Changed the Game
The first three quarters tell a more complicated story than the final score.
Atlanta led 30-28 after the opening period.
The Hawks then extended the advantage by winning the second quarter 28-22.
At halftime, Atlanta was ahead 58-50.
Denver responded in the third quarter, winning that period 25-16.
After three quarters, Atlanta’s lead had been reduced to just one point:
Atlanta 74, Denver 73
That made the fourth quarter the decisive period.
Atlanta then scored 36 points.
Denver scored only 12.
The Hawks therefore won the fourth quarter by 24 points.
The final margin was 23 points.
This means almost the entire final separation was created during the last 12 minutes.
For anyone studying the atlanta hawks vs denver nuggets match player stats, this is one of the most important pieces of context. Looking only at the final score can make the game appear one-sided from the beginning, but the quarter-by-quarter numbers show that Denver was within one point entering the fourth quarter.
What Happened to Denver in the Fourth Quarter?
The supplied box-score data does not identify every possession-level reason for Denver’s fourth-quarter decline, so it would be inaccurate to assign a specific tactical cause without additional play-by-play evidence.
What the statistics do establish is that Denver scored only 12 points in the final quarter.
At the same time, Atlanta scored 36.
That 24-point difference transformed a one-point game after three quarters into a 23-point Atlanta victory.
Denver’s overall 42% field-goal shooting and 19 turnovers provide broader context, but they should not automatically be treated as the sole explanation for the fourth-quarter result.
The strongest factual conclusion is that Atlanta produced a dramatically better final quarter on both ends of the scoreboard.
Atlanta’s Offensive Distribution Was More Balanced
Atlanta finished with 110 points.
Its listed leading scorers were:
- Jalen Johnson: 29
- Nickeil Alexander-Walker: 22
- Dyson Daniels: 17
- Onyeka Okongwu: 15
Those four players combined for 83 points.
That represents 83 of Atlanta’s 110 total points.
The scoring was therefore concentrated among several important contributors rather than depending on only one player.
Denver, meanwhile, had Peyton Watson at 25 points, Aaron Gordon at 14, and Zeke Nnaji at 12 among the listed key scorers.
Watson’s 25 points were strong individually, but Atlanta’s broader scoring output helped produce the higher team total.
Plus/Minus Provides Additional Context
The plus/minus figures from the supplied data provide another way to understand the game.
Atlanta’s listed starters recorded:
- Onyeka Okongwu: +32
- Dyson Daniels: +25
- Jalen Johnson: +11
- Nickeil Alexander-Walker: +9
- Vit Krejci: +7
Every listed Atlanta starter had a positive plus/minus.
Denver’s listed starters recorded:
- Hunter Tyson: +5
- DaRon Holmes II: -5
- Jalen Pickett: -12
- Christian Braun: -8
- Peyton Watson: +2
Four of the five listed Denver starters were at or below negative territory except Watson and Tyson.
Plus/minus should not be treated as a standalone measure of individual performance because it reflects team scoring margin while a player is on the floor. Still, in this particular box-score review, the distribution supports the broader picture of Atlanta controlling the game during the decisive stretches.
Comparing the Main Statistical Categories
A direct team comparison makes the differences easier to understand.
| Category | Atlanta | Denver |
| Points | 110 | 87 |
| Field Goals | 46-94 | 30-72 |
| Field-Goal % | 49% | 42% |
| Three-Pointers | 16-43 | 11-32 |
| Three-Point % | 37% | 34% |
| Free Throws | 2-4 | 16-20 |
| Free-Throw % | 50% | 80% |
| Rebounds | 40 | 44 |
| Assists | 31 | 22 |
| Turnovers | 6 | 19 |
| Steals | 14 | 6 |
| Blocks | 6 | 2 |
Several observations stand out.
Atlanta led in points, field-goal percentage, three-point makes, assists, steals, and blocks.
Denver led in rebounds and free-throw efficiency.
The largest numerical difference came in turnovers.
The largest scoring difference came from overall field-goal production.
Why the 23-Point Margin Matters
The final margin was:
Atlanta +23
That margin should be considered alongside the quarter-by-quarter progression.
Atlanta did not lead by 23 points for the entire game. Instead, the teams were separated by only one point after three quarters.
The fourth-quarter explosion created the final margin.
This is why game analysis should include both full-game statistics and quarter-level data.
A final box score tells you who won and by how much. Quarter scores explain when the game changed.
In this matchup, the fourth quarter was clearly the major turning point.
The December Meeting Adds Context
The January 10 game was not the first meeting between the teams during the 2025-26 season.
Denver won the previous meeting on December 6, 2025, by a score of 134-133.
That was a completely different type of game.
The December meeting featured a combined 267 points and was decided by a single point.
The January rematch finished 110-87, with Atlanta winning by 23.
As a result, the season series became tied at 1-1.
The contrast between the two meetings is notable because the games produced very different scoring environments and margins.
Atlanta’s Statistical Profile in This Game
Atlanta’s performance can be summarized through several measurable strengths.
Efficient Field-Goal Shooting
The Hawks shot 49% from the field.
That was seven percentage points higher than Denver’s 42%.
Strong Three-Point Production
Atlanta made 16 three-pointers compared with Denver’s 11.
Ball Security
Atlanta committed only six turnovers.
Defensive Disruption
The Hawks recorded 14 steals and six blocks.
Ball Movement
Atlanta recorded 31 assists.
These numbers combine to create a strong statistical profile even though the Hawks did not win the rebounding battle or the free-throw efficiency battle.
Denver’s Statistical Profile in This Game
Denver’s strengths were more concentrated.
Rebounding
The Nuggets recorded 44 rebounds.
Free-Throw Shooting
Denver made 16 of 20 free throws for 80%.
Peyton Watson’s Production
Watson led Denver with 25 points and 11 rebounds.
Jalen Pickett’s Playmaking
Pickett led Denver in assists with six.
However, the team also had several areas where the numbers were less favorable.
Denver shot 42% from the field, made 11 three-pointers, recorded 22 assists, and committed 19 turnovers.
Those figures help explain why strong performances from individual players did not translate into a competitive final score.
What the Player Stats Tell Us About the Match
The biggest lesson from this game is that scoring totals alone do not explain a team result.
Peyton Watson scored 25 points, only four fewer than Jalen Johnson.
Watson also had 11 rebounds, matching Daniels for the game-high.
Yet Atlanta won by 23 points.
The difference came from the combined statistical picture.
Atlanta had:
- More made field goals
- A higher field-goal percentage
- More three-pointers
- More assists
- More steals
- More blocks
- Far fewer turnovers
Denver had:
- More rebounds
- More made free throws
- A higher free-throw percentage
The balance of these categories favored Atlanta strongly enough to produce the final result.
How to Read the Box Score Correctly
When researching a game such as this one, it is useful to avoid focusing only on the highest scorer.
A better approach is to review the numbers in stages.
First, check the final score and quarter scores.
Second, compare shooting efficiency.
Third, examine three-point production.
Fourth, check turnovers and assists.
Fifth, review rebounding.
Finally, examine individual player lines and plus/minus.
Using that process with this game produces a much more complete understanding.
For example, Denver’s 44 rebounds might initially suggest a strong overall performance. But once the 19 turnovers and 42% shooting are considered, the broader picture changes.
Similarly, Atlanta’s 40 rebounds were four fewer than Denver’s, but the Hawks compensated through shooting, passing, and defensive pressure.
Key Player Comparison
The most useful individual comparison is between the two leading scorers and the two most statistically complete players.
Jalen Johnson vs Peyton Watson
Johnson:
- 29 points
- 9 rebounds
- 6 assists
- 1 steal
- 1 block
Watson:
- 25 points
- 11 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 3 steals
- 1 block
Both players contributed across several categories.
Johnson had the higher scoring total and more assists.
Watson had more rebounds and steals.
Dyson Daniels vs Jalen Pickett
Daniels:
- 17 points
- 11 rebounds
- 10 assists
- 4 steals
Pickett:
- 7 points
- 6 rebounds
- 6 assists
- 1 steal
Daniels had a much larger statistical footprint in this particular game.
His triple-double was one of the defining individual performances.
Pickett led Denver in assists among the listed players, but Daniels produced significantly more scoring, rebounding, passing, and steals.
Important Numbers to Remember
For a quick reference, the most important figures from the game are:
Final score: Atlanta 110, Denver 87
Largest individual scorer: Jalen Johnson, 29 points
Denver’s leading scorer: Peyton Watson, 25 points
Triple-double: Dyson Daniels, 17 points, 11 rebounds, 10 assists
Game-high rebounds: Dyson Daniels and Peyton Watson, 11 each
Game-high assists: Dyson Daniels, 10
Game-high steals: Dyson Daniels, 4
Atlanta field-goal percentage: 49%
Denver field-goal percentage: 42%
Atlanta turnovers: 6
Denver turnovers: 19
Atlanta assists: 31
Denver assists: 22
Fourth-quarter score: Atlanta 36, Denver 12
Final margin: Atlanta by 23
These numbers provide a concise statistical snapshot of the matchup.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score of the Atlanta Hawks vs Denver Nuggets game on January 10, 2026?
The Atlanta Hawks defeated the Denver Nuggets 110-87 at Ball Arena in Denver. Atlanta led 58-50 at halftime and entered the fourth quarter ahead 74-73 before outscoring Denver 36-12 in the final period.
Who was the leading scorer for the Atlanta Hawks?
Jalen Johnson led Atlanta with 29 points. He also recorded nine rebounds, six assists, one steal, and one block.
Who led the Denver Nuggets in scoring?
Peyton Watson led Denver with 25 points. He also recorded 11 rebounds, four assists, three steals, and one block.
Did Dyson Daniels record a triple-double?
Yes. Dyson Daniels recorded 17 points, 11 rebounds, and 10 assists. He also had four steals, making his performance one of the most complete individual statistical lines of the game.
Which team had more turnovers?
Denver had more turnovers. The Nuggets committed 19 turnovers, while Atlanta committed only six.
Who won the rebounding battle?
Denver won the rebounding battle 44-40. Peyton Watson and Dyson Daniels each recorded 11 rebounds, tying for the game-high.
Conclusion
The atlanta hawks vs denver nuggets match player stats from January 10, 2026, show a game that was much closer through three quarters than the final score suggests.
Atlanta’s 110-87 victory was built around efficient shooting, strong ball movement, defensive pressure, and excellent ball security. The Hawks shot 49% from the field, made 16 three-pointers, recorded 31 assists, generated 14 steals, and committed only six turnovers.
Jalen Johnson led the scoring with 29 points, while Nickeil Alexander-Walker added 22. Dyson Daniels produced a triple-double with 17 points, 11 rebounds, and 10 assists, along with four steals. Onyeka Okongwu also made an impact across several categories and finished with a team-best listed plus/minus of +32.
Denver had its own strong individual performance from Peyton Watson, who scored 25 points and grabbed 11 rebounds. The Nuggets also won the rebounding battle and shot 80% from the free-throw line.
The decisive difference came elsewhere.
Atlanta shot more efficiently from the field, made more three-pointers, generated more assists, created more steals, and protected the basketball far better. The six-to-19 turnover difference was particularly significant.
Most importantly, the game changed dramatically in the fourth quarter. After Denver had reduced Atlanta’s lead to one point entering the final period, the Hawks scored 36 points while limiting the Nuggets to 12.
The result also tied the season series at 1-1 after Denver’s one-point victory in the December 6 meeting.
Taken together, the statistics show why a complete box-score analysis requires more than identifying the highest scorer. Shooting, turnovers, assists, defensive activity, rebounding, and quarter-by-quarter performance all contributed to the final result.
