Washington Wizards vs Cleveland Cavaliers Match Player Stats

The washington wizards vs cleveland cavaliers match player stats from the November 8, 2025 NBA Cup Group Play meeting tell the story of a game that was controlled by Cleveland almost from start to finish. The Cavaliers defeated the Wizards 148-115 at Capital One Arena in Washington, winning by 33 points and producing one of their most complete offensive performances of the early season. Cleveland shot 47% from the field, made 20 three-pointers, collected 57 rebounds, recorded 34 assists and forced Washington into 20 turnovers.

The final score alone explains the result, but the player numbers reveal why the gap became so large. Donovan Mitchell led Cleveland with 24 points, Darius Garland added 20 points and nine assists, Evan Mobley produced 18 points and 10 rebounds, while Jarrett Allen controlled the glass with 14 rebounds. Cleveland also received important production from its bench, including 17 points from Tyrese Proctor and 14 from Sam Merrill.

Washington had individual positives despite the heavy defeat. CJ McCollum led all Wizards scorers with 25 points while shooting 8-for-16 from the field and 6-for-13 from three-point range. Alex Sarr scored 20 points, Tre Johnson added 19, Tristan Vukcevic grabbed 11 rebounds, and Bub Carrington finished with 11 assists.

The difference was that Cleveland’s production was more balanced across scoring, rebounding, passing, defense and second-chance opportunities. Washington generated 115 points, but 20 turnovers and a 25-16 disadvantage in offensive rebounds gave Cleveland too many additional possessions.

Game Overview

The matchup was part of NBA Cup Group Play and took place at Capital One Arena. Cleveland entered the contest with a 6-3 record, including a 3-2 mark on the road. Washington came in at 1-8 and was still searching for its first home victory of the season.

The Cavaliers established control immediately.

Cleveland scored 39 points in the first quarter compared with 26 for Washington. The Wizards responded with 34 points in the second quarter, but Cleveland still entered halftime with a 76-60 advantage.

That second-quarter response briefly gave Washington a chance to reduce the deficit. Instead, Cleveland rebuilt its advantage after halftime.

The Cavaliers scored 33 points in the third quarter while limiting Washington to 27. Cleveland then closed the game with another 39-point quarter, while Washington scored 28.

The quarter-by-quarter scoring was:

Quarter	Cleveland Cavaliers	Washington Wizards
1st	39	26
2nd	37	34
3rd	33	27
4th	39	28
Total	148	115

The most important feature of the scoring pattern is consistency. Cleveland did not rely on one huge quarter and then survive the rest of the game. The Cavaliers scored at least 33 points in every quarter.

That made Washington’s comeback opportunities extremely limited.

Washington Wizards vs Cleveland Cavaliers Match Player Stats

The most useful way to understand this game is to look beyond the leading scorers. Points matter, but the distribution of rebounds, assists, turnovers, steals and shooting efficiency explains why Cleveland won by such a wide margin.

Cleveland Cavaliers Player Statistics

Player	MIN	PTS	FG	3PT	FT	REB	AST	STL	BLK	TO	+/-
Donovan Mitchell	26	24	8-20	4-10	4-4	5	5	4	1	2	+22
Darius Garland	28	20	7-16	4-9	2-2	2	9	1	0	2	+24
Evan Mobley	28	18	7-16	0-4	4-7	10	3	1	1	1	+20
Jarrett Allen	26	16	7-13	0-0	2-4	14	3	2	1	1	+27
De’Andre Hunter	21	8	2-9	0-3	4-4	5	2	1	0	2	+16
Khris Middleton	22	4	2-3	0-1	0-0	2	4	0	0	2	-16
Sam Merrill	18	14	5-6	4-5	0-0	2	2	1	0	0	+10
Tyrese Proctor	19	17	5-6	5-6	2-3	2	3	0	0	1	+7

The larger Cleveland rotation also included productive minutes from other bench players, helping the team maintain pressure after the starters had created a comfortable advantage.

Donovan Mitchell’s Efficient Leadership

Donovan Mitchell finished with 24 points in only 26 minutes.

His shooting line was 8-for-20 from the field, 4-for-10 from three-point range and 4-for-4 from the free throw line. He also contributed five rebounds, five assists, four steals and one block.

The four steals stand out because Mitchell’s influence was not limited to scoring.

His 24 points tied him for Cleveland’s highest individual scoring total in the game, but his passing and defensive activity made his overall contribution much broader.

The Cavaliers also benefited from Mitchell’s willingness to attack without having to carry every offensive possession. Garland handled much of the playmaking responsibility, while Mobley and Allen created interior pressure.

This balance is important when evaluating Cleveland’s performance. Mitchell did not need a 40-point night because the surrounding players consistently converted their opportunities.

Darius Garland Controls the Offense

Darius Garland produced one of the most important statistical performances of the game with 20 points and nine assists.

He shot 7-for-16 from the field and 4-for-9 from three-point range. He also made both of his free throws.

Garland’s nine assists were the highest total for either team.

That number illustrates Cleveland’s ability to create shots through multiple actions rather than depending exclusively on isolation scoring. Garland could score when Washington backed away, but he could also create opportunities for teammates.

His +24 plus-minus was another strong indicator of Cleveland’s control during his minutes.

The combination of 20 points and nine assists gave Garland a major role in both the scoring output and the distribution of that scoring.

Evan Mobley’s Two-Way Contribution

Evan Mobley finished with 18 points, 10 rebounds, three assists, one steal and one block.

His 10 rebounds gave Cleveland another strong interior presence alongside Allen.

Mobley shot 7-for-16 from the field. He struggled from long range, going 0-for-4 from three, but his interior scoring and rebounding reduced the importance of that weakness.

His contribution also demonstrates why box score analysis should not focus only on shooting percentages. A player can have an imperfect shooting night and still have a significant effect through rebounding, defense, passing and efficient two-point scoring.

Mobley’s +20 plus-minus shows how effectively Cleveland controlled the game while he was on the floor.

Jarrett Allen Owns the Glass

Jarrett Allen was Cleveland’s top rebounder with 14 boards.

He scored 16 points on 7-for-13 shooting and added three assists, two steals and one block.

His 14 rebounds were especially valuable because eight came on the offensive glass.

That is a major part of the story behind Cleveland’s 25 offensive rebounds as a team.

Offensive rebounds create extra possessions. Extra possessions create additional scoring opportunities. Against a team that already committed 20 turnovers, those additional opportunities made it extremely difficult for Washington to stay within striking distance.

Allen’s +27 was also the highest plus-minus among the Cleveland players listed in the supplied data.

Tyrese Proctor Provides a Major Bench Spark

Tyrese Proctor was one of Cleveland’s most efficient scorers.

He scored 17 points in 19 minutes while going 5-for-6 from the field and 5-for-6 from three-point range.

That is an exceptional shooting performance.

Proctor’s five made three-pointers came from only six attempts. His ability to convert those opportunities helped Cleveland continue producing points beyond its primary starters.

Sam Merrill also made a major contribution, scoring 14 points on 5-for-6 shooting and 4-for-5 from three-point range.

Together, Proctor and Merrill showed the importance of Cleveland’s bench efficiency.

The Cavaliers did not simply win because their stars played well. Their reserves converted open opportunities and prevented Washington from finding a comfortable defensive rhythm.

Washington Wizards Player Performance

Washington had several players who produced useful individual numbers despite the 33-point loss.

CJ McCollum Leads Washington

CJ McCollum led the Wizards with 25 points.

He shot 8-for-16 from the field, 6-for-13 from three-point range and 3-for-4 from the free throw line.

His six made three-pointers were the highest total for either team from an individual Washington player.

McCollum’s 25 points were also the most points scored by any player in the game.

However, the overall team result demonstrates an important distinction between individual scoring success and team offensive efficiency.

McCollum scored effectively, but Washington still committed 20 turnovers and struggled to generate enough defensive stops. His individual offensive production could not compensate for Cleveland’s broader statistical advantage.

His final plus-minus was -28, which reflected the overall difference in team performance during his minutes.

Alex Sarr Shows Offensive Promise

Alex Sarr scored 20 points while shooting 10-for-17 from the field.

He also recorded four rebounds, four assists, one steal and four blocks.

The four blocks were especially notable because they were the highest individual block total in the game.

Sarr’s offensive efficiency was one of Washington’s strongest positives. He made 10 of his 17 field goal attempts, although he went 0-for-4 from three-point range and 0-for-2 at the free throw line.

His statistical profile showed a player who could contribute in several areas even when the overall team performance was uneven.

The challenge for Washington was converting individual contributions into collective defensive resistance and better possession management.

Tre Johnson Adds Efficient Scoring

Tre Johnson finished with 19 points in 29 minutes.

He shot 7-for-11 from the field and 3-for-4 from three-point range. He also added three rebounds and one assist.

His field goal efficiency was one of the clearest positives for Washington.

Johnson did not need a high volume of attempts to reach 19 points. His 7-for-11 shooting showed that he was able to take advantage of his opportunities.

The issue was that Cleveland’s overall offensive efficiency and depth created a much higher team scoring ceiling.

Bub Carrington’s Playmaking

Bub Carrington recorded 11 assists, which was the highest total for Washington.

He also had four rebounds, two points, two three-pointers and one block.

The 11 assists demonstrate that Carrington was actively creating opportunities for teammates even though his own shooting was difficult.

He shot 2-for-12 overall and 2-for-7 from three-point range.

This is a useful example of why a player’s box score should be viewed in context. Carrington’s scoring efficiency was poor, but his playmaking was a genuine positive.

Washington needed his passing because Cleveland’s defense created pressure on the ball and forced the Wizards into difficult possessions.

Tristan Vukcevic Controls the Offensive Glass

Tristan Vukcevic grabbed 11 rebounds in 19 minutes.

Six of those rebounds came on the offensive glass.

That was an excellent individual rebounding effort, especially considering his limited playing time.

His rebounding helped Washington create extra possessions, but Cleveland still dominated the offensive rebounding battle 25-16 as a team.

That difference is important.

Washington had individual players capable of winning possessions, but Cleveland had more players doing it consistently.

Corey Kispert Adds Bench Scoring

Corey Kispert scored 16 points in 20 minutes.

He shot 5-for-8 from the field, 2-for-4 from three-point range and 4-for-4 from the free throw line.

Kispert provided efficient scoring from the bench and helped keep Washington’s offense productive.

His performance was one of the reasons Washington reached 115 points despite losing by 33.

The issue was not simply Washington’s ability to score. The larger problem was preventing Cleveland from scoring even more.

The Team Statistics That Decided the Game

The player numbers become much easier to understand when the team statistics are compared directly.

Category	Cavaliers	Wizards
Points	148	115
Field Goals	52-110	41-91
FG Percentage	47%	45%
Three-Pointers	20-45	15-41
3PT Percentage	44%	37%
Free Throws	24-31	18-23
FT Percentage	77%	78%
Rebounds	57	44
Assists	34	32
Turnovers	10	20
Steals	15	5
Blocks	6	7
Offensive Rebounds	25	16
Defensive Rebounds	32	28

Several numbers immediately stand out.

Cleveland Won the Possession Battle

Cleveland committed only 10 turnovers.

Washington committed 20.

That is a 10-turnover difference in a game decided by 33 points.

Turnovers are particularly damaging because they can create transition opportunities for the opponent while simultaneously eliminating a team’s own scoring possession.

Cleveland also recorded 15 steals compared with five for Washington.

The combination of 15 steals and only 10 turnovers shows how effectively the Cavaliers protected the ball while creating defensive pressure.

Washington’s 20 turnovers gave Cleveland a major opportunity to increase its scoring volume.

Offensive Rebounding Created Extra Chances

Cleveland collected 25 offensive rebounds.

Washington collected 16.

That nine-rebound advantage on the offensive glass gave Cleveland repeated opportunities after missed shots.

Allen alone contributed eight offensive rebounds.

Mobley added four, while several Cleveland bench players also contributed to the team’s total.

This is one of the most important statistics for understanding how Cleveland reached 148 points.

The Cavaliers did not simply shoot well. They also created additional possessions.

Three-Point Shooting Increased the Margin

Cleveland made 20 of 45 three-point attempts.

Washington made 15 of 41.

That gave Cleveland five more made three-pointers.

At three points per basket, those five additional makes represent a 15-point advantage from three-point makes alone.

Cleveland’s 44% three-point shooting was also seven percentage points better than Washington’s 37%.

The Cavaliers combined volume with efficiency.

That combination is difficult to defend because reducing attempts can leave a team vulnerable inside, while allowing open perimeter looks can produce rapid scoring runs.

The Free Throw Difference Was Small

Washington actually shot slightly better from the free throw line.

The Wizards converted 78% of their attempts compared with 77% for Cleveland.

This statistic shows why free throw percentage was not a deciding factor.

Washington went 18-for-23, while Cleveland went 24-for-31.

Cleveland attempted eight more free throws and made six more.

The difference came from generating more opportunities rather than having a major accuracy advantage.

Why Cleveland Won by 33 Points

The final margin can be explained through several connected advantages.

First, Cleveland scored consistently. The Cavaliers posted 39, 37, 33 and 39 points across the four quarters.

Second, Cleveland protected the ball. Ten turnovers compared with Washington’s 20 gave the Cavaliers a significant possession advantage.

Third, Cleveland dominated the offensive glass. The 25-16 edge created extra scoring chances.

Fourth, Cleveland shot 44% from three while making 20 three-pointers.

Fifth, the Cavaliers received scoring from multiple players.

Mitchell scored 24.

Garland scored 20.

Mobley scored 18.

Allen scored 16.

Proctor scored 17.

Merrill scored 14.

That is six players reaching at least 14 points.

Washington also had several strong scorers, but its production was less effective in the context of the overall possession battle.

McCollum had 25.

Sarr had 20.

Johnson had 19.

Kispert had 16.

The Wizards had enough individual scoring to reach 115 points, but not enough defensive control to slow Cleveland.

A Deeper Look at Efficiency

One of the most useful lessons from this game is that field goal percentage alone does not explain the result.

Washington actually shot 45% from the field.

Cleveland shot 47%.

That is only a two-percentage-point difference.

If someone looked only at field goal percentage, the game would not appear to be a 33-point blowout.

The larger difference came from what happened around those shots.

Cleveland:

• Made 20 three-pointers.
• Grabbed 25 offensive rebounds.
• Committed only 10 turnovers.
• Recorded 15 steals.
• Finished with 34 assists.
• Collected 57 total rebounds.

Washington:

• Made 15 three-pointers.
• Grabbed 16 offensive rebounds.
• Committed 20 turnovers.
• Recorded five steals.
• Finished with 32 assists.
• Collected 44 rebounds.

This is a classic example of why advanced game analysis needs more than one shooting percentage.

The Cavaliers were better at creating possessions, preserving possessions and converting high-value opportunities.

The Importance of Cleveland’s Ball Movement

Cleveland finished with 34 assists.

That number was only two higher than Washington’s 32, so the assist gap itself was not enormous.

The difference was how Cleveland combined its assists with shooting efficiency.

Garland recorded nine assists.

Mitchell recorded five.

Mobley recorded three.

Allen recorded three.

Proctor recorded three.

This distribution indicates that playmaking responsibilities were spread across the roster.

Washington also had a strong individual playmaker in Carrington, who finished with 11 assists.

However, the Wizards were unable to turn that playmaking into enough efficient team offense to keep pace.

The Cavaliers’ passing worked particularly well because their perimeter shooting and interior scoring gave defenders multiple problems.

What the Plus-Minus Numbers Tell Us

Plus-minus should never be treated as a complete measure of individual performance, but in a 33-point game it provides useful context.

Cleveland’s leading plus-minus figures among the supplied players included:

• Jarrett Allen: +27
• Darius Garland: +24
• Donovan Mitchell: +22
• Evan Mobley: +20
• De’Andre Hunter: +16

The numbers show that Cleveland’s starters were not merely collecting statistics during a close game. They were on the floor during substantial stretches of team dominance.

Washington’s main rotation players had negative plus-minus figures:

• CJ McCollum: -28
• Alex Sarr: -23
• Bub Carrington: -22
• Tre Johnson: -18
• Khris Middleton: -16

These numbers reflect the overall game environment.

A player can perform well individually while still posting a negative plus-minus because basketball is a five-player sport. McCollum’s 25 points and Sarr’s 20 points were legitimate positives, but Cleveland’s overall advantage remained too large.

What Washington Did Well

A 33-point defeat does not mean everything was negative for Washington.

There were several individual positives.

Strong Individual Shooting

McCollum shot 50% from the field and made six three-pointers.

Sarr shot nearly 59% from the field.

Johnson shot nearly 64% from the field.

Kispert shot 63% from the field.

These numbers show that Washington had players capable of scoring efficiently.

Playmaking From Carrington

Carrington’s 11 assists were a major positive.

He created opportunities for teammates even though his own shot was not falling.

That ability can be important over the course of a season because a point guard who can continue creating when scoring efficiency drops provides value beyond the scoring column.

Interior Rebounding

Vukcevic collected 11 rebounds in limited minutes.

Sarr added four.

Washington’s 16 offensive rebounds also demonstrate that the team did not completely lose the physical battle.

The problem was that Cleveland won the same battle by an even wider margin.

What Cleveland Did Especially Well

Cleveland’s greatest strength was balance.

The Cavaliers did not require one player to produce an extraordinary individual scoring total.

Mitchell led the team with 24, but five other Cleveland players reached at least 14 points.

The Cavaliers also had strong contributions in every major statistical area.

Scoring was balanced.

Rebounding was strong.

Three-point shooting was efficient.

Turnovers were limited.

Steals were high.

Assists were plentiful.

Offensive rebounding was dominant.

That is the statistical profile of a team that controls a game rather than simply surviving it.

Key Takeaways for Evaluating Player Stats

When analyzing a game like this, the most useful approach is to move through the box score in layers.

Start With the Score

The 148-115 final score establishes the basic outcome.

Check Scoring Distribution

Cleveland had six players with at least 14 points among the highlighted rotation.

That immediately shows that the offense was not dependent on one scorer.

Check Possessions

The turnover difference and offensive rebounding difference explain why Cleveland had more chances.

Check Shooting Value

The Cavaliers made five more three-pointers.

Check Playmaking

Cleveland had 34 assists, with Garland leading the team at nine.

Check Defensive Activity

Cleveland recorded 15 steals.

Check Individual Context

Mitchell, Garland, Mobley and Allen all posted strong all-around contributions, while Proctor and Merrill supplied highly efficient bench scoring.

This layered approach provides a much better understanding than simply listing the top scorer.

What the Game Means for Future Matchups

The result also provides useful clues for future meetings between these teams.

For Washington, reducing turnovers would be one of the clearest areas for improvement.

Twenty turnovers against a high-scoring opponent can quickly become a major problem.

The Wizards also need to limit second-chance opportunities.

Giving Cleveland 25 offensive rebounds is especially costly when Allen and Mobley are available to attack the glass.

For Cleveland, the challenge in future games is maintaining the same balance.

A team cannot expect every night to produce 20 made three-pointers, but the underlying principles are repeatable.

Protect the ball.

Create good shots.

Attack the offensive glass.

Share the ball.

Use multiple scorers.

Defend without giving away easy possessions.

Those factors are more sustainable than relying on one player to score at an extreme level.

How to Read the Box Score Correctly

A box score is most useful when it answers questions rather than simply providing numbers.

For this game, several questions have clear answers.

Who led Cleveland in scoring?

Donovan Mitchell with 24 points.

Who led Washington in scoring?

CJ McCollum with 25 points.

Who had the most rebounds?

Jarrett Allen with 14.

Who had the most assists?

Bub Carrington led Washington with 11, while Darius Garland led Cleveland with nine.

Who had the best three-point shooting among the highlighted Cleveland players?

Tyrese Proctor went 5-for-6 from three.

Who had the most steals?

Donovan Mitchell recorded four.

Who had the most blocks?

Alex Sarr recorded four for Washington.

Which team controlled the glass?

Cleveland, with 57 total rebounds compared with Washington’s 44.

Which team protected the ball better?

Cleveland, with 10 turnovers compared with Washington’s 20.

These answers collectively explain the result far better than the final score alone.

Reference for the Official Box Score

For readers who want to verify the official game record, player lines and team totals, the ESPN box score provides the underlying statistical record for the matchup. ESPN box score

FAQs

Who scored the most points in the Cavaliers vs Wizards game?

CJ McCollum scored the most points for either team with 25. Donovan Mitchell led Cleveland with 24 points.

What was the final score between the Cavaliers and Wizards?

Cleveland defeated Washington 148-115, winning by 33 points.

Who led the Cavaliers in rebounds?

Jarrett Allen led Cleveland with 14 rebounds, including eight offensive rebounds.

Who led the Cavaliers in assists?

Darius Garland led Cleveland with nine assists.

How many three-pointers did Cleveland make?

Cleveland made 20 of 45 three-point attempts, shooting 44% from beyond the arc.

Which team had more turnovers?

Washington committed 20 turnovers, twice Cleveland’s total of 10.

Conclusion

The washington wizards vs cleveland cavaliers match player stats show that Cleveland’s 148-115 victory was about much more than individual scoring.

Donovan Mitchell led Cleveland with 24 points and added five rebounds, five assists and four steals. Darius Garland contributed 20 points and nine assists. Evan Mobley posted 18 points and 10 rebounds, while Jarrett Allen delivered 16 points and a game-high 14 rebounds.

The bench was equally important. Tyrese Proctor scored 17 points while making five of six three-point attempts, and Sam Merrill added 14 points on five-for-six shooting.

Washington had strong individual performances of its own. CJ McCollum scored 25 points, Alex Sarr scored 20 and blocked four shots, Tre Johnson added 19 points on efficient shooting, Corey Kispert scored 16, Tristan Vukcevic grabbed 11 rebounds and Bub Carrington delivered 11 assists.

The deciding factors were the team numbers.

Cleveland shot 47% from the field and 44% from three. The Cavaliers made 20 three-pointers, collected 57 rebounds, grabbed 25 offensive boards, recorded 34 assists and produced 15 steals.

Washington shot 45% overall and 37% from three, but the Wizards committed 20 turnovers and finished with 44 rebounds.

The nine-rebound advantage on the offensive glass, 10-turnover advantage and five-made-three advantage explain why Cleveland created such a large scoring gap.

The game is therefore best understood as a complete team performance from Cleveland rather than a one-player takeover. The Cavaliers combined efficient perimeter shooting, interior rebounding, ball security, defensive pressure and balanced scoring to turn a competitive early-season matchup into a 33-point victory.