Lakers vs 76ers Match Player Stats

Lakers vs 76ers match player stats from the December 8, 2025 meeting tell the story of a close game that was decided by shot-making, star production, and a dramatic fourth-quarter response from Los Angeles. The Lakers defeated the Philadelphia 76ers 112-108 at Xfinity Mobile Arena in Philadelphia, improving to 17-6 overall and 10-3 on the road, while Philadelphia moved to 13-10 and 7-7 at home. Luka Doncic recorded a triple-double with 31 points, 15 rebounds, and 11 assists, while LeBron James added 29 points and delivered the decisive scoring stretch late in the fourth quarter.

The final margin was only four points, but the underlying numbers reveal a much more interesting contest. Philadelphia won the rebounding battle 54-52, grabbed 17 offensive rebounds, committed only six turnovers, and shot 88% from the free-throw line. Yet the Lakers won because they were dramatically more efficient from the field. Los Angeles shot 48% overall compared with Philadelphia’s 35%, and that difference outweighed the 76ers’ advantages in second-chance opportunities and free throws.

This game is especially useful to study because neither team dominated every statistical category. Instead, the Lakers won the categories that had the biggest influence on overall scoring efficiency.

Table of Contents

Game Overview

The Lakers entered the matchup with a 16-6 record before the victory and finished the night at 17-6. Philadelphia entered at 13-9 and dropped to 13-10 after the loss.

The final score was:

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Final
Los Angeles Lakers	30	23	34	25	112
Philadelphia 76ers	30	30	24	24	108

The quarter-by-quarter pattern explains why the game remained competitive for so long.

Philadelphia matched Los Angeles 30-30 in the opening quarter and then created separation by winning the second quarter 30-23. At halftime, the 76ers had a seven-point advantage.

The Lakers changed the game in the third quarter. They scored 34 points while limiting Philadelphia to 24, producing a 10-point swing. That turned a seven-point halftime deficit into a three-point Lakers lead entering the fourth.

Neither side produced a huge offensive quarter in the final period. Los Angeles scored 25 points and Philadelphia scored 24. The difference was that the Lakers were able to make the most important shots when the game was still within reach.

The most important individual performance belonged to Luka Doncic. He finished with 31 points, 15 rebounds, and 11 assists, producing a triple-double while also leading the Lakers with a plus-12 plus/minus.

LeBron James was almost as influential in a different way. He scored 29 points on 12-of-17 shooting and connected on four of six three-point attempts. His efficiency was particularly important because Philadelphia could not afford to give him clean perimeter opportunities late in the game.

The complete leading-player comparison looks like this:

Player	PTS	REB	AST	FG	3PT	FT
Luka Doncic	31	15	11	9-24	2-9	11-14
LeBron James	29	7	6	12-17	4-6	1-2
Rui Hachimura	17	6	1	7-12	3-7	0-0
Deandre Ayton	14	12	2	7-7	0-0	0-0
Austin Reaves	11	4	4	3-16	2-6	3-5
Tyrese Maxey	28	7	9	11-24	5-8	1-2
Joel Embiid	16	7	2	4-21	0-6	8-8
VJ Edgecombe	15	5	3	5-13	2-3	3-3
Paul George	12	6	3	3-8	1-3	5-5
Dominick Barlow	7	4	0	2-7	1-2	2-2

The table highlights the central contrast. Doncic had a relatively inefficient shooting night by his own standards, but his rebounding, passing, and free-throw production made his overall contribution enormous. James, meanwhile, produced outstanding shooting efficiency and supplied the late-game scoring that ultimately separated the teams.

Luka Doncic’s Triple-Double Was the Statistical Foundation

Doncic finished with 31 points, 15 rebounds, and 11 assists. It was the type of performance that affects nearly every part of a game.

His nine made field goals came on 24 attempts, and he made two of nine three-point attempts. Those numbers alone do not fully explain his impact.

His 15 rebounds were crucial because Philadelphia actually won the overall rebounding battle. Doncic’s individual work helped the Lakers compete on the glass despite Philadelphia’s aggressive offensive-rebounding approach.

His 11 assists also show that his influence was not limited to scoring. The Lakers were able to generate offense through his playmaking, particularly when Philadelphia’s defense focused on stopping his scoring opportunities.

Doncic also made 11 of 14 free throws. That gave him an additional scoring route on a night when his three-point shot was not especially efficient.

His plus-12 was the best mark among Lakers players. That means Los Angeles was 12 points better than Philadelphia during his time on the floor.

The most revealing aspect of his performance is therefore not simply the 31 points. It is the combination of scoring, rebounding, playmaking, and free-throw generation.

LeBron James Delivered the Late Difference

LeBron James scored 29 points on 12-of-17 shooting. His 70.6% field-goal rate was one of the most efficient high-volume scoring performances in the game.

He also made four of six three-pointers.

That perimeter accuracy mattered because Philadelphia had to respect his outside shot while also dealing with his ability to attack the basket.

The fourth quarter became the defining portion of James’ performance. According to the game recap, James scored 10 straight points in the fourth quarter, including the go-ahead three-pointer with 1:12 remaining and a subsequent 20-foot basket that pushed the Lakers further ahead. ESPN game recap and box score

This is an important distinction when evaluating player statistics. A player’s final point total tells you what happened over 48 minutes, but it does not always tell you when those points mattered most.

James’ 29 points were not evenly distributed in terms of importance. His late scoring arrived when the outcome was still undecided.

Rui Hachimura Provided Efficient Secondary Scoring

Rui Hachimura finished with 17 points, six rebounds, and one assist.

His 7-of-12 shooting was efficient, and he made three of seven three-point attempts. That combination gave the Lakers another player capable of converting opportunities without requiring a large number of possessions.

Hachimura also finished with a plus-7.

His performance was valuable because the Lakers did not have to rely entirely on Doncic and James for scoring. When a team has two primary offensive stars, efficient secondary scoring can make defensive game planning much more difficult.

Philadelphia could not simply concentrate all defensive attention on Doncic and James. Hachimura’s shooting created another problem for the defense.

Deandre Ayton Was Perfect From the Field

Deandre Ayton delivered one of the most efficient performances of the night.

He scored 14 points on 7-of-7 shooting while adding 12 rebounds and two assists. He also finished with a plus-10.

The perfect field-goal percentage is the obvious headline, but the rebounding numbers may have been just as important.

Philadelphia had 17 offensive rebounds as a team. That created additional possessions and helped the 76ers remain in the game despite their poor overall shooting. Ayton’s 12 rebounds helped the Lakers limit the damage and maintain control of the interior battle.

His two offensive rebounds and 10 defensive rebounds also show that his contribution was balanced.

For a center, seven made shots without a miss is an unusually clean offensive performance. Ayton did not need a large number of touches to have an impact.

Austin Reaves Had an Inefficient Shooting Night

Austin Reaves scored 11 points with four rebounds and four assists.

His shooting was considerably less efficient than that of several other Lakers players. He made only three of 16 field-goal attempts and two of six three-point attempts.

However, looking only at his shooting would miss part of his contribution.

Reaves still produced four assists and four rebounds. He also made three of five free throws.

His plus/minus was plus-1, suggesting that despite his offensive inefficiency, his overall minutes did not significantly hurt the Lakers’ final result.

This is a useful lesson when interpreting box scores. A low shooting percentage should be considered important, but it should not automatically be treated as a complete evaluation of a player’s performance.

Tyrese Maxey Led Philadelphia’s Offense

Tyrese Maxey was Philadelphia’s leading scorer with 28 points.

He shot 11-of-24 from the field and was especially effective from three-point range, making five of eight attempts. He also added seven rebounds and nine assists.

Those nine assists show how important Maxey was as a creator. He was not simply Philadelphia’s scoring option. He was also responsible for creating opportunities for teammates.

His five made threes helped Philadelphia maintain offensive pressure even while the team struggled to convert overall.

Maxey finished with a minus-9, however. That does not mean he played poorly. Instead, it reflects the larger challenge Philadelphia faced during his minutes.

The 76ers needed Maxey’s scoring, but the Lakers were still able to win the minutes in which he was on the floor.

Joel Embiid’s Shooting Was the Biggest Offensive Problem

Joel Embiid finished with 16 points, seven rebounds, and two assists.

His free-throw shooting was perfect at 8-of-8, but his field-goal shooting was the clearest weakness in Philadelphia’s offensive performance.

Embiid made only four of 21 field-goal attempts and missed all six of his three-point attempts.

That means he scored 16 points despite making only four shots from the field. The free-throw line accounted for half of his total scoring.

For a player with Embiid’s offensive role, that level of shooting inefficiency creates a significant burden for the rest of the lineup.

There is also an important contextual point. Embiid still finished with a plus-11, the best plus/minus among Philadelphia’s listed players.

That tells us that the game cannot be reduced to shooting percentage alone. Philadelphia’s minutes with Embiid on the floor were still positive in terms of point differential, even though his personal field-goal shooting was poor.

This is exactly why player evaluation should combine traditional statistics rather than relying on one number.

VJ Edgecombe Made a Useful Contribution

VJ Edgecombe scored 15 points, collected five rebounds, and recorded three assists.

He shot 5-of-13 overall and 2-of-3 from three-point range. He also made all three of his free throws.

His plus-6 was the second-best mark among Philadelphia’s listed starters.

Edgecombe’s performance was particularly useful because Philadelphia needed contributions beyond Maxey. His three-point shooting helped stretch the Lakers’ defense, while his rebounding and passing added value beyond scoring.

Paul George Added Efficiency but Not Enough Volume

Paul George finished with 12 points, six rebounds, and three assists.

He shot 3-of-8 from the field, including 1-of-3 from three-point range, while making all five of his free throws.

The free-throw accuracy helped him maintain an efficient scoring total despite limited field-goal volume.

However, Philadelphia needed more offensive production from its secondary scorers because Embiid struggled from the floor.

George’s 12 points were useful, but the overall team shooting problem was too large to overcome.

Dominick Barlow’s Numbers

Dominick Barlow recorded seven points, four rebounds, and no assists.

He shot 2-of-7 from the field, including 1-of-2 from three-point range, and made both free throws.

His role was more limited than that of Philadelphia’s primary offensive players, but his minutes were part of a larger rotation that had to deal with the Lakers’ size and star power.

Team Shooting Explains the Four-Point Result

The strongest statistical argument for the Lakers’ victory is field-goal efficiency.

Los Angeles:

41-of-85 from the field
48% field-goal shooting
13-of-36 from three
36% from three
17-of-27 from the line
63% free-throw shooting

Philadelphia:

36-of-102 from the field
35% field-goal shooting
13-of-36 from three
36% from three
23-of-26 from the line
88% free-throw shooting

The three-point percentage was identical at 36%.

That is important.

Philadelphia did not lose because it was worse from three-point range. Both teams made 13 threes.

Instead, the largest shooting difference came inside the overall field-goal numbers. The Lakers made five more field goals despite attempting 17 fewer shots.

That is an enormous efficiency advantage.

Philadelphia took 102 field-goal attempts compared with 85 for Los Angeles. Normally, extra attempts can compensate for poor shooting. In this case, the 76ers did not get enough efficiency from those additional attempts.

The Rebounding Battle Favored Philadelphia

Philadelphia won the total rebounding battle 54-52.

The more striking number was offensive rebounds.

The 76ers grabbed 17 offensive rebounds, while the Lakers collected eight.

That is a nine-rebound advantage on the offensive glass.

Philadelphia’s offensive rebounding helped create second opportunities and contributed to the team’s ability to remain competitive despite shooting only 35% from the field.

The Lakers responded by collecting 44 defensive rebounds.

This prevented Philadelphia’s strong offensive-rebounding effort from becoming an even bigger advantage.

The Lakers therefore lost the overall rebounding category but still won the game because their shooting efficiency was more valuable than Philadelphia’s extra possessions.

Turnovers Tell Another Interesting Story

Philadelphia committed only six turnovers.

The Lakers committed 10.

On the surface, that should have favored Philadelphia.

It did not.

The Lakers’ 10 turnovers were costly, but their shooting advantage more than compensated for the difference.

The 76ers also generated five steals compared with three for Los Angeles.

This is another example of why one statistical category rarely determines a basketball game.

Philadelphia won:

Rebounds
Offensive rebounds
Turnovers
Steals
Free-throw percentage

Yet the Lakers won the game.

The reason is that the Lakers were significantly more efficient at converting their offensive opportunities into points.

Assists Showed the Lakers’ Offensive Connectivity

Los Angeles recorded 25 assists compared with 21 for Philadelphia.

The four-assist advantage is not enormous, but it supports the broader picture of a Lakers offense that produced efficient shots.

Doncic led the Lakers with 11 assists.

James added six.

Reaves contributed four.

That distribution shows how multiple players were involved in creating offense.

Philadelphia was led by Maxey’s nine assists, while Edgecombe and George each added three.

The difference was that Los Angeles received elite playmaking from both of its major stars.

The Third Quarter Changed the Game

The third quarter was arguably the most important team-level stretch.

Philadelphia entered halftime with a seven-point lead after winning the second quarter 30-23.

Then the Lakers scored 34 points in the third while Philadelphia scored only 24.

That 10-point advantage was enough to erase the halftime deficit and establish a three-point Lakers lead heading into the fourth.

This was not a game where one team simply controlled the opening tip through the final buzzer.

Instead, the momentum shifted.

Philadelphia had the better second quarter.

Los Angeles had the better third.

Then the Lakers made enough high-value plays in the fourth to preserve the lead.

Fourth-Quarter Execution Separated the Teams

The final period was close statistically.

The Lakers scored 25.

Philadelphia scored 24.

That one-point quarter advantage does not look dramatic, but the timing of the Lakers’ scoring mattered more than the raw total.

James’ late three-pointer gave Los Angeles the lead, followed by another basket that extended the advantage.

Philadelphia still had opportunities, but its earlier shooting problems meant that the margin for error was extremely small.

A team shooting 35% from the field has less room to recover from late-game possessions that do not produce points.

Why the Lakers Won Despite Several Statistical Disadvantages

The Lakers’ victory can be explained through four major factors.

1. Superior overall field-goal efficiency

The Lakers shot 48%.

Philadelphia shot 35%.

That 13-percentage-point difference was the largest statistical gap in the game.

2. Elite star production

Doncic produced a 31-point triple-double.

James scored 29 points on 12-of-17 shooting.

Together, they accounted for 60 Lakers points.

3. Ayton’s perfect shooting

Ayton went 7-for-7 while adding 12 rebounds.

That gave Los Angeles highly efficient interior production.

4. Late-game shot-making

James’ fourth-quarter scoring surge helped the Lakers convert a close game into a four-point victory.

These factors were strong enough to offset Philadelphia’s advantages in rebounding, turnovers, steals, and free-throw accuracy.

What Philadelphia Did Well

The 76ers should not be judged solely by the final score.

They created 17 offensive rebounds, nine more than the Lakers.
They committed only six turnovers.
They shot 88% from the free-throw line.

Maxey produced 28 points and nine assists.

Embiid still posted a plus-11 despite his inefficient field-goal shooting.

Edgecombe finished with 15 points and a plus-6.

Philadelphia also led after the first half and remained within striking distance throughout the fourth quarter.

The biggest problem was not effort or opportunity generation. It was conversion.

The 76ers created extra possessions but did not turn enough of those possessions into efficient field goals.

What Los Angeles Did Well

The Lakers were more efficient in several critical areas.

Their 48% shooting gave them a reliable scoring base.
Their 13 three-pointers matched Philadelphia’s total.
Their 25 assists demonstrated effective offensive distribution.
Their eight blocks helped protect the interior.

Most importantly, their leading players combined volume with efficiency in different ways.

Doncic provided all-around production.

James provided elite shooting and late-game scoring.

Hachimura delivered efficient secondary offense.

Ayton was perfect from the field.

That balance made the Lakers difficult to contain.

Plus/Minus Provides Useful Context

The Lakers’ leading plus/minus players were:

Luka Doncic: +12
Deandre Ayton: +10
Rui Hachimura: +7

For Philadelphia:

Joel Embiid: +11
VJ Edgecombe: +6
Jared McCain: +3

The most interesting number is Embiid’s +11.

His 16 points on 4-of-21 shooting might lead someone to conclude that he was a major negative. The plus/minus tells a more complicated story.

Plus/minus should never be treated as a standalone measure of individual quality, but it can reveal whether a player’s minutes coincided with successful team stretches.

In this game, Embiid’s minutes were positive despite his difficult shooting.

Doncic’s +12, however, aligned more closely with his complete statistical contribution because he combined scoring, rebounding, and assists.

Bench Production

The Lakers did not receive a massive scoring contribution from their bench.

Jake LaRavia scored four points.

Jaxson Hayes scored three.

Gabe Vincent scored three.

Jarred Vanderbilt did not score but recorded one assist.

Philadelphia received:

Andre Drummond: 11 points, 12 rebounds
Jared McCain: 8 points, 1 rebound, 1 assist
Quentin Grimes: 7 points, 8 rebounds, 3 assists
Jabari Walker: 4 points, 4 rebounds

Drummond’s 11 points and 12 rebounds were particularly valuable. His eight offensive rebounds created additional opportunities for Philadelphia.

Yet the Lakers’ starting lineup produced enough offense to compensate for the bench scoring difference.

The Deeper Meaning of the Matchup

The game demonstrates an important basketball principle: efficiency can overcome volume.

Philadelphia had more rebounds.
Philadelphia had more offensive rebounds.
Philadelphia committed fewer turnovers.
Philadelphia shot free throws much better.
Philadelphia even had more steals.

But Los Angeles made five more field goals while attempting 17 fewer shots.

That is the clearest explanation for the final result.

The Lakers did not need to win every category. They needed to win the categories that generated the most efficient scoring.

A Practical Way to Read Player Stats From This Game

If you are analyzing a box score like this one, avoid starting with points alone.

Instead, use a five-step process.

Step 1: Identify the high-volume scorers

Look for players taking a significant number of shots.

Here, Doncic attempted 24 field goals, Maxey attempted 24, and Embiid attempted 21.

Step 2: Check efficiency

Compare field goals made with attempts.

James’ 12-of-17 stands out immediately.

Ayton’s 7-of-7 is even more efficient.

Embiid’s 4-of-21 is the opposite extreme.

Step 3: Check creation

Look at assists.

Doncic had 11.

Maxey had nine.

James had six.

That tells you who was creating offense rather than simply finishing possessions.

Step 4: Check rebounding

Doncic had 15 rebounds.

Ayton had 12.

Drummond had 12.

Those numbers can significantly affect possession control.

Step 5: Examine the team context

Finally, compare shooting, turnovers, rebounding, and free throws at the team level.

This prevents one player’s statistics from being interpreted without understanding the game around them.

Key Statistical Takeaways

The most important numbers from the matchup can be summarized as follows:

Category	Lakers	76ers	Advantage
Final score	112	108	Lakers
Field goals	41-85	36-102	Lakers
FG percentage	48%	35%	Lakers
Three-pointers	13-36	13-36	Even
Free throws	17-27	23-26	76ers
Rebounds	52	54	76ers
Offensive rebounds	8	17	76ers
Assists	25	21	Lakers
Turnovers	10	6	76ers
Steals	3	5	76ers
Blocks	8	4	Lakers

This table captures the central tension of the game.

Philadelphia won more possession-related categories.

Los Angeles won shooting efficiency and ultimately won the game.

Lakers vs 76ers Match Player Stats: Who Had the Best Performance?

There are two strong candidates for the Lakers.

Luka Doncic had the most complete statistical performance. His 31 points, 15 rebounds, and 11 assists produced a triple-double, and his plus-12 was the best mark on either team.

LeBron James had the most efficient high-volume scoring performance. His 29 points came on 12-of-17 shooting, and his fourth-quarter scoring directly influenced the final result.

If the question is who produced the most complete box score, Doncic has the strongest case.

If the question is who made the most decisive late-game offensive plays, James has the strongest case.

For Philadelphia, Maxey was the standout offensive performer. His 28 points and nine assists gave the 76ers a consistent scoring and playmaking engine.

Season Series Context

The Lakers took a 1-0 lead in the season series with this victory.

The next listed matchup was scheduled for February 6, 2026, with Philadelphia visiting Los Angeles.

For matchup analysis, the first meeting provides a useful baseline. The Lakers showed that their combination of star playmaking and shooting efficiency could overcome Philadelphia’s strength on the offensive glass.

At the same time, Philadelphia demonstrated that it could create extra possessions and pressure the Lakers through rebounding.

That makes the matchup interesting because the teams achieved success through different statistical paths.

Final Player-by-Player Assessment

Los Angeles Lakers

Luka Doncic: Outstanding all-around performance. The triple-double and plus-12 make him the statistical centerpiece of the win.

LeBron James: Highly efficient scorer who delivered the most important fourth-quarter stretch.

Rui Hachimura: Efficient secondary scorer who made three three-pointers and finished plus-7.

Deandre Ayton: Perfect shooting night with 14 points and 12 rebounds.

Austin Reaves: Struggled from the field but contributed four assists and remained close to neutral in plus/minus.

Bench: Limited scoring, but enough supporting production to allow the starters to carry the offensive workload.

Philadelphia 76ers

Tyrese Maxey: Strong offensive performance with 28 points and nine assists.

Joel Embiid: Poor field-goal efficiency but perfect free-throw shooting and a team-best plus-11.

VJ Edgecombe: Solid two-way statistical contribution with 15 points, five rebounds, and three assists.

Paul George: Efficient enough from the free-throw line but did not provide enough field-goal scoring.

Dominick Barlow: Limited offensive production.

Bench: Drummond provided excellent rebounding and 11 points, while Grimes and McCain added useful contributions.

FAQs

Who was the Lakers’ leading scorer against the 76ers?

Luka Doncic led the Lakers with 31 points. He also recorded 15 rebounds and 11 assists for a triple-double.

How many points did LeBron James score against Philadelphia?

LeBron James scored 29 points. He shot 12-of-17 from the field and made four of six three-point attempts.

How many points did Tyrese Maxey score?

Tyrese Maxey led Philadelphia with 28 points. He also recorded seven rebounds and nine assists.

Did Joel Embiid have a good shooting game?

No. Embiid scored 16 points but made only 4 of 21 field-goal attempts and missed all six of his three-point attempts. He did make all eight of his free throws.

Which team won the rebounding battle?

Philadelphia won the rebounding battle 54-52 and had a major advantage on the offensive glass, grabbing 17 offensive rebounds compared with eight for Los Angeles.

What was the final score?

The Lakers defeated the 76ers 112-108. Los Angeles overcame a seven-point halftime deficit by outscoring Philadelphia 34-24 in the third quarter.

Conclusion

The Lakers’ 112-108 victory over Philadelphia was a strong example of how efficiency and late-game execution can overcome disadvantages in other statistical categories.

The 76ers won the rebounding battle, produced 17 offensive rebounds, committed only six turnovers, and shot 88% from the free-throw line. Those numbers normally provide a strong foundation for winning.

The Lakers countered with superior field-goal efficiency, stronger overall passing numbers, eight blocks, and elite production from their two biggest stars.

Luka Doncic’s 31-point triple-double gave Los Angeles an all-around offensive engine, while LeBron James supplied 29 points on highly efficient shooting and delivered the decisive fourth-quarter scoring sequence. Deandre Ayton’s perfect 7-of-7 shooting and 12 rebounds also provided valuable interior production.

For Philadelphia, Tyrese Maxey’s 28 points and nine assists were the clearest offensive positives. Embiid’s 16 points came with severe shooting inefficiency, although his plus-11 demonstrates why his complete impact cannot be judged by field-goal percentage alone.

Ultimately, the most revealing number in the game was the shooting difference. Los Angeles made 41 of 85 field goals, while Philadelphia made 36 of 102. Both teams made 13 three-pointers, so the decisive separation came from overall shot conversion rather than three-point volume.

That is the main lesson from this matchup. A team can win rebounds, force turnovers, and shoot free throws well, but if it cannot convert enough field-goal attempts, those advantages may not be enough. The Lakers produced the more efficient offense when it mattered most and left Philadelphia with a four-point defeat.