Utah Jazz vs Sacramento Kings Match Player Stats
The utah jazz vs sacramento kings match player stats from the November 28, 2025 NBA Cup Group Play meeting tell a clear story about how Utah controlled the game for most of the night. The Jazz defeated the Kings 128-119 at Delta Center in Salt Lake City, using balanced scoring, strong rebounding, and timely offensive execution to protect a double-digit lead for much of the second half.
Keyonte George led Utah with 31 points, while Lauri Markkanen added 28 and Brice Sensabaugh contributed 20. Sacramento received a huge scoring night from Zach LaVine, who finished with 34 points. Keegan Murray added 23 points, while Russell Westbrook produced a triple-double with 16 points, 12 rebounds, and 14 assists.
The final score was closer than the overall flow of the game suggested. Utah led 62-51 at halftime and extended the advantage to 90-73 after three quarters. Sacramento scored 46 points in the fourth quarter, but the comeback attempt was not enough.
For readers studying the utah jazz vs sacramento kings match player stats, the most useful detail is not simply who scored the most. The deeper story comes from the combination of shooting efficiency, rebounding, ball movement, free throws, turnovers, and how each team’s leading players affected the game.
Game Overview
The matchup was part of NBA Cup Group Play and was played at Delta Center in Salt Lake City. The official game record lists the contest as Friday, November 28, 2025, while some game displays show November 29 because of the late-night timing and time-zone presentation.
Utah entered the game with a 6-12 record and a 5-5 home mark. Sacramento came in at 5-15 overall and 2-9 on the road.
The Jazz eventually won 128-119.
The four-quarter scoring pattern was:
| Quarter | Sacramento Kings | Utah Jazz |
| 1st | 27 | 30 |
| 2nd | 24 | 32 |
| 3rd | 22 | 28 |
| 4th | 46 | 38 |
| Final | 119 | 128 |
Utah therefore won each of the first three quarters. Sacramento only had the advantage in the fourth.
That pattern is important because it explains why the Kings’ 46-point final quarter did not produce a victory. The Jazz had already created a 17-point advantage entering the final period.
The official NBA game record confirms the 128-119 result, the quarter-by-quarter scoring, and the main statistical details from the contest.
Utah Jazz vs Sacramento Kings Match Player Stats Breakdown
The utah jazz vs sacramento kings match player stats show that Utah received more consistent production across several important areas.
Utah shot 42 of 87 from the field for 48.3 percent. Sacramento made 43 of 96 attempts for 44.8 percent.
That difference may look small, but it mattered because Utah also generated more assists and rebounds.
The Jazz finished with:
- 42 field goals on 87 attempts
- 48 percent field-goal shooting
- 13 three-pointers on 40 attempts
- 32 assists
- 49 rebounds
- 31 made free throws
- 12 turnovers
- 7 steals
- 5 blocks
Sacramento finished with:
- 43 field goals on 96 attempts
- 45 percent field-goal shooting
- 10 three-pointers on 29 attempts
- 27 assists
- 44 rebounds
- 23 made free throws
- 9 turnovers
- 9 steals
- 5 blocks
The Kings actually committed fewer turnovers, but Utah produced better overall offensive efficiency and controlled the glass.
Keyonte George Leads Utah With 31 Points
Keyonte George was the most important scorer for Utah.
He finished with 31 points and also contributed six assists and five rebounds. His scoring became especially valuable when Sacramento threatened to reduce the Jazz advantage.
George hit back-to-back three-pointers during the third quarter and followed them with a floater. Those possessions helped Utah rebuild its advantage after Sacramento had moved closer.
His performance was not limited to scoring. Six assists showed that he also helped create opportunities for teammates.
This is one reason the utah jazz vs sacramento kings match player stats should be viewed beyond the traditional points column. George combined scoring and playmaking at a critical point in the game.
Utah needed that production because Sacramento repeatedly attempted to change the game’s momentum.
George also helped Utah establish separation during a third quarter in which Sacramento briefly appeared capable of making the game competitive.
Lauri Markkanen Provides Efficient Scoring
Lauri Markkanen finished with 28 points and was another major reason Utah controlled the first half.
His impact was especially noticeable during the second quarter.
Markkanen scored 12 points in the second quarter and helped Utah create a significant advantage. His scoring contributed to a 20-2 Jazz run that pushed Utah ahead.
The Kings eventually responded and reduced the deficit, but Markkanen hit a three-pointer and then scored at the halftime buzzer.
That sequence gave Utah a 62-51 lead entering halftime.
The importance of Markkanen’s performance becomes clearer when looking at the game situation. Sacramento needed to close the gap before halftime, but Utah repeatedly answered successful Kings possessions with efficient scoring.
Markkanen’s 28 points therefore had value beyond his final total. Much of his production came during stretches when Utah needed to maintain control.
Brice Sensabaugh Adds 20 Points
Brice Sensabaugh gave Utah another important scoring option with 20 points.
He shot 6 of 11 from the field and finished with a plus-11 rating in the official box score.
His contribution reduced the pressure on George and Markkanen.
That balance is important in a game where one team consistently maintains a lead. When multiple players can score efficiently, the defense has fewer opportunities to focus entirely on the primary scorer.
Sensabaugh also provided valuable production without requiring excessive dribbling. Utah’s offense benefited from quick decisions and ball movement throughout the contest.
His 20-point performance was therefore an important part of Utah’s overall offensive balance.
Jusuf Nurkic Nearly Records a Triple-Double
Jusuf Nurkic had one of the more unusual statistical performances of the game.
He finished with 9 points, 11 rebounds, and 9 assists.
Although he missed a triple-double by only one point and one assist, his passing was particularly useful.
Utah finished the game with 32 assists, five more than Sacramento.
Nurkic’s ability to contribute as a passer from the frontcourt gave Utah another way to move the ball. His 11 rebounds also helped the Jazz control possessions and reduce Sacramento’s opportunities for second-chance scoring.
For statistical analysis, this is a good example of why points alone do not describe a player’s complete impact.
A player who scores nine points can still have a major influence through rebounding and playmaking.
Isaiah Collier Helps Utah’s Ball Movement
Isaiah Collier scored nine points and added seven assists.
His playmaking helped Utah maintain offensive flow when George was not directly creating the scoring opportunity.
The Jazz finished with 32 total assists, showing that their offense was not dependent on one player creating everything.
Collier’s seven assists were especially useful in a game where Utah repeatedly found ways to produce quality scoring opportunities.
His contribution also reflects a broader feature of the Jazz performance. Utah’s offense involved several players rather than relying on isolation possessions throughout the night.
Kevin Love Contributes Across the Box Score
Kevin Love scored nine points and collected seven rebounds.
His scoring total was modest compared with George and Markkanen, but his rebounding helped Utah finish with a 49-44 advantage on the glass.
That five-rebound team advantage mattered because Sacramento was attempting to overcome a substantial scoring deficit.
Utah also collected 13 offensive rebounds compared with 12 for Sacramento.
The Jazz therefore created additional possessions while also doing enough defensively to limit the Kings’ second opportunities.
Zach LaVine Leads Sacramento With 34 Points
Zach LaVine was Sacramento’s leading scorer with 34 points.
His scoring output was the highest individual total from either team.
LaVine was particularly important during Sacramento’s attempts to close the gap. He helped the Kings stay within reach during stretches when Utah appeared ready to pull away.
However, his 34 points were not enough to offset Utah’s more balanced offensive production.
This is an important distinction when analyzing the utah jazz vs sacramento kings match player stats.
The Kings had the game’s highest individual scorer, but Utah had the winning combination of multiple scoring contributors, rebounding, and sustained offensive execution.
LaVine’s performance should therefore be viewed as a strong individual scoring effort within a team result that went the other way.
Keegan Murray Finishes With 23 Points
Keegan Murray scored 23 points for Sacramento.
He also contributed nine rebounds, making him one of the Kings’ most productive players across multiple statistical categories.
Murray shot 9 of 18 from the field, giving him a 50 percent field-goal percentage.
His scoring became especially important during Sacramento’s third-quarter comeback attempt.
The Kings reduced Utah’s lead to 67-65 after a Murray three-pointer.
That sequence showed that Sacramento was capable of creating pressure on Utah. However, the Jazz responded with consecutive three-pointers from George and eventually rebuilt the lead.
Murray’s production was therefore significant, but Sacramento needed more sustained support around him.
Russell Westbrook Records a Triple-Double
Russell Westbrook produced one of the most notable individual statistical lines of the game.
He finished with:
- 16 points
- 12 rebounds
- 14 assists
That gave Westbrook a triple-double.
The performance also demonstrated his ability to influence multiple areas of the game.
His 14 assists were the highest total from either team. He also led Sacramento in rebounds with 12.
Despite those numbers, the Kings could not turn his all-around performance into a victory.
This illustrates an important point for anyone reviewing player statistics. A triple-double is a major individual achievement, but it does not automatically indicate that a team controlled the game.
Sacramento had the individual statistical production from Westbrook, but Utah’s overall team structure produced the better result.
Maxime Raynaud Provides 19 Points
Maxime Raynaud scored 19 points for Sacramento and added four rebounds.
His scoring gave the Kings another reliable option alongside LaVine and Murray.
Raynaud’s production became particularly useful during the fourth quarter, when Sacramento scored 46 points.
The Kings became much more efficient offensively in the final period, but the deficit created during the opening three quarters was too large to erase.
That contrast is one of the clearest lessons from this game.
Strong fourth-quarter production can change the appearance of a box score, but the first three quarters determine the size of the deficit that must be overcome.
DeMar DeRozan Finishes With 16 Points
DeMar DeRozan scored 16 points, grabbed two rebounds, and recorded three assists.
He shot 5 of 10 from the field and made all five of his free-throw attempts.
His 50 percent field-goal shooting was efficient, but Sacramento needed more total offensive production to match Utah.
DeRozan’s scoring was also important because the Kings were relying on several players to share the offensive workload.
His final numbers show that he was productive without dominating the possession count.
Team Shooting Comparison
The shooting numbers provide one of the clearest explanations for the final score.
| Statistic | Sacramento | Utah |
| Field Goals | 43-96 | 42-87 |
| FG Percentage | 44.8% | 48.3% |
| 3-Pointers | 10-29 | 13-40 |
| 3PT Percentage | 34.5% | 32.5% |
| Free Throws | 23-32 | 31-40 |
| FT Percentage | 71.9% | 77.5% |
| Total Points | 119 | 128 |
Sacramento actually had a slightly better three-point percentage.
However, Utah attempted 40 three-pointers compared with 29 for Sacramento and made three more.
The larger difference came at the free-throw line.
Utah made 31 free throws on 40 attempts. Sacramento made 23 on 32 attempts.
That produced an eight-point difference in made free throws.
When combined with Utah’s better field-goal percentage, the free-throw advantage helped the Jazz create enough scoring separation.
Rebounding Comparison
Rebounding was another important factor.
Utah collected 49 rebounds, while Sacramento finished with 44.
The Jazz also had 13 offensive rebounds and 36 defensive rebounds.
Sacramento recorded 12 offensive rebounds and 32 defensive rebounds.
The five-rebound overall advantage may not appear enormous, but extra possessions can become important when combined with efficient shooting.
Utah’s rebounding performance helped prevent Sacramento from completely controlling the second-chance opportunities.
The Jazz also generated 17 second-chance points compared with six for Sacramento, according to the official game statistics.
That 11-point advantage in second-chance scoring is one of the most useful statistics for understanding the game.
Assists and Ball Movement
Utah finished with 32 assists.
Sacramento had 27.
The five-assist difference reflects a meaningful distinction between the two offenses.
Utah’s scoring was distributed among George, Markkanen, Sensabaugh, and several supporting players.
Nurkic and Collier also provided significant playmaking.
Sacramento had strong individual production, particularly from LaVine, Murray, and Westbrook, but Utah’s offensive distribution helped maintain its lead.
The game therefore provides a useful example of why team assists can complement individual scoring statistics when evaluating offensive execution.
Turnovers and Possession Control
Sacramento committed nine turnovers.
Utah committed 12.
This was one area where the Kings had the statistical advantage.
However, the three-turnover difference was not enough to compensate for Utah’s advantages elsewhere.
Sacramento also recorded nine steals compared with seven for Utah.
Those numbers show that Sacramento was active defensively and created several opportunities through pressure.
The problem was that the Kings did not convert enough of those advantages into a complete comeback.
Utah’s superior shooting efficiency, rebounding, free-throw production, and assist total outweighed its turnover disadvantage.
Fourth Quarter Comeback Attempt
The fourth quarter deserves special attention.
Sacramento scored 46 points in the final period.
Utah scored 38.
That means the Kings outscored the Jazz by eight points during the fourth quarter.
However, Utah entered the period with a 90-73 advantage.
Sacramento therefore needed to overcome a 17-point deficit.
The Kings reduced the margin but could not completely erase it.
The official game account notes that Sacramento made a strong push early in the fourth quarter, while Utah responded to maintain enough separation.
This sequence explains why the final margin was nine points even though the game had reached a much larger difference earlier.
How Utah Built the 17-Point Lead
Utah’s biggest lead was 17 points.
The Jazz built that advantage through several stretches rather than one isolated run.
The second quarter was especially important.
Utah opened the period strongly, with Markkanen helping generate a 20-2 run.
Sacramento eventually responded, but Utah closed the half with another 7-0 run.
That produced the 62-51 halftime score.
The third quarter then followed a similar pattern.
Sacramento reduced the deficit to two points at one stage, but George responded with consecutive three-pointers.
Utah finished the third quarter on a 10-0 run.
That run changed the game again and gave the Jazz a 90-73 advantage heading into the final period.
What the Box Score Says About Both Teams
The utah jazz vs sacramento kings match player stats reveal two different styles of contribution.
Sacramento had excellent individual statistical production.
LaVine scored 34.
Murray scored 23.
Raynaud scored 19.
DeRozan and Westbrook each scored 16.
Westbrook added a triple-double.
Yet the Kings still lost.
Utah’s advantage came from distribution.
George scored 31.
Markkanen scored 28.
Sensabaugh scored 20.
Nurkic nearly recorded a triple-double.
Collier added seven assists.
Love contributed seven rebounds.
The Jazz therefore received meaningful contributions from several players across different areas.
This is one of the most useful lessons from the game.
A box score should not be read only from the highest scoring column. Rebounding, assists, free throws, shooting percentage, and second-chance points can explain why one team wins despite another team having the leading scorer.
Utah’s Free-Throw Advantage
Free throws played a major role in the final result.
Utah made 31 of 40 attempts.
Sacramento made 23 of 32.
The Jazz therefore scored eight more points from made free throws.
Their 77.5 percent free-throw percentage was also better than Sacramento’s 71.9 percent.
While free throws were not the only reason Utah won, the difference was meaningful.
In a nine-point game, an eight-point advantage from the free-throw line represents a large portion of the final margin.
This is one of the clearest statistical areas to examine when studying the matchup.
Utah’s Second-Chance Scoring
The Jazz scored 17 second-chance points.
Sacramento scored six.
That created an 11-point advantage for Utah in second-chance scoring.
This difference came from Utah’s ability to generate offensive rebounds and convert additional possessions into points.
The Jazz had 13 offensive rebounds compared with Sacramento’s 12, so the raw offensive-rebound difference was only one.
The larger difference came from what Utah did with those opportunities.
This is an important analytical distinction.
Simply counting offensive rebounds does not always explain their value. The next question should be how many points those extra possessions generated.
Why Sacramento’s Fourth Quarter Was Not Enough
Sacramento’s 46-point fourth quarter was an impressive scoring period.
The Kings shot 62.1 percent from the field during the final quarter according to the official game record.
They also made 18 of 29 field-goal attempts during the period.
However, Utah had already created too much separation.
The Jazz’s first three quarters were the decisive part of the game.
Utah scored 90 points through three quarters while Sacramento had 73.
That 17-point difference allowed the Jazz to absorb Sacramento’s late offensive surge.
For future statistical analysis, this is a useful reminder to examine scoring by quarter rather than relying only on the final score.
Previous Meeting Between the Teams
This was not the first meeting between Utah and Sacramento during the season.
The previous matchup ended with Utah defeating Sacramento 105-104 on October 25, 2025.
That means Utah won both meetings referenced in the provided season data.
The November matchup was much higher scoring than the October meeting.
Utah improved from 105 points to 128.
Sacramento increased from 104 points to 119.
The difference shows how dramatically the offensive environment changed between the two games.
The season series therefore stood at 2-0 in favor of Utah following the November contest based on the two games described here.
Season Context
The result moved Utah to 6-12 according to the supplied game data, while Sacramento moved to 5-15.
The home and away records also provide context.
Utah entered with a 5-5 home record.
Sacramento entered with a 2-9 road record.
Home-court performance and road performance can affect the way a game develops, particularly when one team is trying to build an early advantage.
Utah ultimately protected its home floor.
The attendance at Delta Center was listed at 18,186.
Most Important Player Statistics
For readers who want the essential numbers quickly, these were the standout performances.
Utah Jazz
Keyonte George: 31 points, 6 assists, 5 rebounds
Lauri Markkanen: 28 points
Brice Sensabaugh: 20 points
Jusuf Nurkic: 9 points, 11 rebounds, 9 assists
Isaiah Collier: 9 points, 7 assists
Kevin Love: 9 points, 7 rebounds
Sacramento Kings
Zach LaVine: 34 points
Keegan Murray: 23 points, 9 rebounds
Maxime Raynaud: 19 points, 4 rebounds
Russell Westbrook: 16 points, 12 rebounds, 14 assists
DeMar DeRozan: 16 points, 2 rebounds, 3 assists
These numbers show why both teams had several productive players even though the final result favored Utah.
What Makes This Box Score Interesting
The most interesting part of the matchup is the difference between individual and team production.
Sacramento’s LaVine scored more than anyone on Utah.
Westbrook recorded a triple-double.
Murray scored 23 points and grabbed nine rebounds.
Yet Utah controlled the game for most of the night.
The Jazz had better field-goal efficiency, more assists, more rebounds, more made free throws, and substantially more second-chance points.
This combination produced a nine-point victory.
The game is therefore a useful example of why player statistics need context.
A single high-scoring performance can stand out, but winning basketball often depends on several players contributing in different ways.
Key Statistical Takeaways
Several numbers stand above the rest when reviewing the game.
- Utah scored 128 points.
The Jazz produced enough offense to stay ahead despite Sacramento’s late comeback. - Keyonte George scored 31 points.
He was Utah’s leading scorer and made important plays during Sacramento’s comeback attempts. - Lauri Markkanen scored 28 points.
His second-quarter production helped Utah establish its halftime advantage. - Zach LaVine scored 34 points.
He was the game’s leading scorer. - Russell Westbrook recorded 16 points, 12 rebounds, and 14 assists.
His triple-double was one of the game’s most notable individual achievements. - Utah collected 49 rebounds.
Sacramento had 44. - Utah recorded 32 assists.
Sacramento had 27. - Utah made 31 free throws.
Sacramento made 23. - Utah scored 17 second-chance points.
Sacramento scored six. - Sacramento scored 46 fourth-quarter points.
Despite the late surge, the Kings could not overcome the 17-point deficit.
How to Read These Player Stats Correctly
When reviewing a matchup like this, start with the final score, but do not stop there.
The next step is to compare shooting efficiency.
After that, look at rebounds, assists, turnovers, and free throws.
Then examine individual performances.
Finally, review the quarter-by-quarter scoring to understand when the game was actually decided.
That approach gives a much clearer picture than simply listing the top scorers.
For example, LaVine’s 34 points are immediately impressive. However, Utah’s combined production from George, Markkanen, and Sensabaugh created 79 points from three players.
That balance helped the Jazz maintain pressure across the game.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the top scorer in the Utah vs Sacramento game?
Zach LaVine was the game’s leading scorer with 34 points for Sacramento. Utah’s leading scorer was Keyonte George with 31 points.
What was the final score between Utah and Sacramento?
The Utah Jazz defeated the Sacramento Kings 128-119 at Delta Center.
Did Russell Westbrook record a triple-double?
Yes. Westbrook finished with 16 points, 12 rebounds, and 14 assists.
Who led the Jazz in scoring?
Keyonte George led Utah with 31 points. Lauri Markkanen followed with 28 points.
Which team had more rebounds?
Utah had 49 rebounds, while Sacramento had 44.
Which team shot better from the field?
Utah shot 48.3 percent from the field. Sacramento shot 44.8 percent.
Conclusion
The utah jazz vs sacramento kings match player stats from this NBA Cup meeting show how a team can win through balanced production even when the opponent has the game’s leading scorer.
Zach LaVine’s 34 points stood out for Sacramento, while Russell Westbrook added a triple-double with 16 points, 12 rebounds, and 14 assists. Keegan Murray also delivered 23 points and nine rebounds.
For Utah, Keyonte George led the scoring with 31 points. Lauri Markkanen added 28, while Brice Sensabaugh supplied 20. Jusuf Nurkic nearly recorded a triple-double with nine points, 11 rebounds, and nine assists.
The team statistics explain the final result even more clearly. Utah shot 48.3 percent from the field, collected 49 rebounds, recorded 32 assists, and made 31 free throws. The Jazz also produced 17 second-chance points.
Sacramento responded with a 46-point fourth quarter, but Utah had already established a 90-73 advantage through three quarters.
The final 128-119 score therefore reflects more than a strong individual scoring performance. It reflects Utah’s ability to combine efficient shooting, rebounding, playmaking, free-throw production, and timely scoring throughout the game.
For anyone studying this matchup, the most useful approach is to look at the complete statistical picture rather than focusing on points alone.
