Toronto Raptors vs Oklahoma City Thunder match player stats
The Toronto Raptors vs Oklahoma City Thunder match player stats tell the story of one of the most competitive games of the 2025-26 NBA regular season. Toronto defeated Oklahoma City 103-101 at Paycom Center in a game that featured 17 lead changes, nine ties, and a dramatic fourth quarter. Immanuel Quickley led the Raptors with 23 points and 11 rebounds, while Scottie Barnes contributed 10 points, 11 rebounds, and 8 assists. For Oklahoma City, Shai Gilgeous-Alexander finished with 24 points and 6 assists, while Luguentz Dort added 19 points and made 4 of 8 attempts from three-point range.
The game is particularly interesting because Toronto entered the matchup with a 29-19 record and a strong 16-9 mark on the road, while Oklahoma City was 37-10 overall and 20-5 at home. Despite that contrast, the Raptors controlled several important areas of the game, especially rebounding and interior scoring, and held on after the Thunder produced two separate periods of offensive pressure.
There is also a date-label detail worth noting. The official NBA game page lists the contest as Sunday, January 25, 2026, while its game information records Monday, January 26, 2026 at 12:00 AM. The matchup itself took place at Paycom Center in Oklahoma City, and this article follows January 26, 2026 as the supplied game date.
Toronto Raptors vs Oklahoma City Thunder match player stats at a glance
| Category | Toronto Raptors | Oklahoma City Thunder |
| Final score | 103 | 101 |
| First quarter | 25 | 30 |
| Second quarter | 29 | 20 |
| Third quarter | 25 | 31 |
| Fourth quarter | 24 | 20 |
| Field goals | 37-86 | 33-75 |
| Field-goal percentage | 43% | 44% |
| Three-pointers | 12-34 | 11-43 |
| Three-point percentage | 35% | 26% |
| Free throws | 17-26 | 24-31 |
| Free-throw percentage | 65% | 77% |
| Rebounds | 51 | 37 |
| Assists | 28 | 21 |
| Turnovers | 11 | 11 |
| Steals | 10 | 5 |
| Blocks | 6 | 5 |
The numbers immediately show why the final score was so close. Oklahoma City shot slightly better overall, but Toronto dominated the glass by 14 rebounds and created five more assists. The Raptors also made one more three-pointer despite taking nine fewer attempts from beyond the arc.
Game summary
Toronto’s 103-101 victory was its fourth consecutive win at the time. The Raptors did not win because they completely controlled the game from start to finish. Instead, they survived several momentum swings and executed better during the final possessions.
Oklahoma City opened the game strongly, taking a 30-25 lead after the first quarter. The Thunder then struggled to maintain that advantage in the second period. Toronto scored 29 points in the second quarter while limiting Oklahoma City to 20, turning a five-point deficit into a four-point halftime lead.
The third quarter reversed the momentum again. Oklahoma City scored 31 points and Toronto scored 25, giving the Thunder a 81-79 advantage entering the final period.
The fourth quarter was ultimately decisive. Toronto scored 24 points while Oklahoma City managed 20. Neither team created much separation, and the result came down to execution in the final minute.
The NBA’s official recap noted that Quickley made two free throws with 8.2 seconds remaining to give Toronto the necessary cushion. Oklahoma City’s final-quarter production from Gilgeous-Alexander was also limited. He scored only three points in the fourth quarter and attempted one shot during the period.
Toronto Raptors player stats
Toronto’s statistical profile was balanced. Quickley supplied the biggest scoring total, but Barnes’ all-around production was arguably just as important because he contributed across multiple categories.
Immanuel Quickley
Quickley was Toronto’s leading scorer with 23 points. He shot 7 of 14 from the field, including 6 of 10 from three-point range, and converted 3 of 4 free throws.
His 11 rebounds were especially valuable for a guard. Quickley also recorded 2 assists, 2 steals, and only 1 turnover.
The six made three-pointers were a major part of Toronto’s offensive success. The Raptors did not rely on volume alone. They made 12 of 34 three-point attempts as a team, and Quickley accounted for half of those makes.
His late-game free throws were even more important. With the game essentially decided by a possession, converting both attempts under pressure gave Toronto a three-point advantage with 8.2 seconds left.
Scottie Barnes
Barnes delivered one of the most complete statistical performances of the game.
He finished with:
- 10 points
- 11 rebounds
- 8 assists
- 1 steal
- 3 blocks
- 2 turnovers
- +15 plus/minus
Barnes shot 3 of 8 from the field and made all four of his free throws.
His eight assists were particularly important because Toronto finished with 28 assists as a team. Barnes did not need to dominate the scoring column to influence the game. His rebounding, playmaking, and defensive activity allowed Toronto to remain effective even when individual possessions became difficult.
The +15 plus/minus was also the best mark among the Raptors’ starters. It reinforces how much Toronto benefited from Barnes’ overall impact while he was on the floor.
RJ Barrett
Barrett contributed 14 points, 6 rebounds, 2 assists, and 2 steals.
He shot 6 of 12 from the field and made both of his three-point attempts. His scoring efficiency was important because Toronto did not receive a highly efficient shooting performance from every starter.
Barrett’s two steals also contributed to Toronto’s defensive activity. The Raptors finished with 10 steals compared with five for Oklahoma City, a five-steal advantage that helped compensate for the Thunder’s slight edge in field-goal percentage.
Brandon Ingram
Ingram scored 13 points, adding 5 rebounds, 4 assists, and 2 blocks.
His shooting line was less efficient than Toronto would have wanted. He finished 5 of 18 from the field and 0 of 3 from three-point range. Still, his four assists and defensive contributions gave him value beyond his scoring total.
This is an important lesson when reading a single-game box score. A 13-point performance can look ordinary if points are the first statistic examined, but Ingram contributed in rebounding, passing, and rim protection as well.
Sandro Mamukelashvili
Mamukelashvili recorded 10 points, 5 rebounds, 3 assists, 1 steal, and 1 block.
He shot 3 of 8 from the field and 4 of 8 at the free-throw line.
His role was useful because Toronto needed frontcourt size against Oklahoma City’s combination of Chet Holmgren and physical wings. His contributions were not spectacular in any single category, but they helped Toronto maintain its overall balance.
Gradey Dick
Dick provided efficient perimeter scoring off the bench.
He finished with 10 points, shooting 4 of 7 from the field and 2 of 3 from three-point range. He also grabbed 3 rebounds and added 1 assist.
His 57.1% field-goal shooting and 66.7% three-point shooting made him one of Toronto’s most efficient scorers in the game.
Ja’Kobe Walter
Walter played 28 minutes and finished with 9 points, 3 rebounds, 2 assists, and 3 steals.
He shot 3 of 8 from the field and made 1 of 6 three-point attempts.
The three steals were a valuable defensive contribution, particularly in a game where turnovers were otherwise equal at 11 apiece.
Jamal Shead
Shead contributed 9 points, 4 rebounds, and 5 assists in 24 minutes.
His five assists were important for Toronto’s second unit. He also finished with a positive plus/minus of +1.
Shead missed two free throws with 13 seconds remaining, but Toronto recovered the rebound. That sequence became important because it allowed Quickley to draw a foul and convert the free throws that ultimately helped seal the win.
Ochai Agbaji
Agbaji played 15 minutes and scored 5 points, shooting 2 of 2 from the field. He also collected 3 rebounds and 1 assist.
His perfect field-goal shooting gave Toronto efficient production during his limited minutes.
Oklahoma City Thunder player stats
The Thunder had several strong individual performances, but the team’s 26% three-point shooting ultimately created a difficult offensive environment in a two-point game.
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander
Gilgeous-Alexander led Oklahoma City with 24 points and added 3 rebounds, 6 assists, 1 steal, and 2 blocks.
He shot an excellent 8 of 11 from the field and 8 of 10 from the free-throw line.
His 24 points came efficiently, but the final quarter changed the story. He scored only three points in the fourth period and attempted just one shot. Toronto’s ability to limit his late offensive involvement was one of the most important developments of the game.
Luguentz Dort
Dort scored 19 points and was Oklahoma City’s most productive three-point shooter.
He made 6 of 10 field-goal attempts, including 4 of 8 from three-point range. He also grabbed 8 rebounds, recorded 2 assists, and made 2 steals.
Dort’s shooting was one of the reasons Oklahoma City remained competitive despite the team’s overall 11-of-43 performance from three-point range.
Chet Holmgren
Holmgren finished with 11 points and 10 rebounds, giving him a double-double.
He shot 5 of 10 from the field and added 2 offensive rebounds. His 10 rebounds made him Oklahoma City’s leading rebounder.
Toronto’s 51-37 advantage on the glass, however, meant Holmgren did not receive enough rebounding support from the rest of the Thunder lineup to close the gap.
Kenrich Williams
Williams produced a strong bench performance with 15 points, 5 rebounds, and 1 assist.
He shot 4 of 11 from the field, 1 of 7 from three-point range, and a perfect 6 of 6 at the free-throw line.
His +9 plus/minus was one of Oklahoma City’s best marks. That indicates that the Thunder’s bench unit had stretches where it competed effectively even though the team eventually lost.
Aaron Wiggins
Wiggins added 11 points, 3 rebounds, and 4 assists.
He shot 3 of 10 from the field and 2 of 9 from three-point range. His scoring was useful, but his shooting efficiency was not enough to offset Oklahoma City’s poor overall perimeter percentage.
Isaiah Joe
Joe scored 10 points in 22 minutes.
He made 3 of 9 field-goal attempts, including 2 of 7 from three-point range. He also added 2 assists and 1 steal.
Jaylin Williams
Jaylin Williams started and finished with 5 points, 3 rebounds, 1 assist, 1 steal, and 1 block.
His defensive presence helped Oklahoma City remain competitive, although Toronto’s rebounding advantage eventually became one of the defining differences.
Cason Wallace
Wallace scored 3 points, with 1 rebound and 1 assist.
He played 16 minutes and was part of an Oklahoma City starting group that struggled to generate enough perimeter scoring.
Toronto’s biggest statistical advantage: rebounding
The most obvious statistical difference between the teams was rebounding.
Toronto finished with 51 rebounds, while Oklahoma City collected 37.
That is a 14-rebound advantage for the Raptors.
The difference was even more meaningful because the game was decided by only two points. In a close game, extra possessions can be more valuable than raw shooting percentages.
Toronto collected 12 offensive rebounds. Oklahoma City had only five.
That means Toronto repeatedly created second opportunities after missed shots. Even when a possession ended without a made field goal, the Raptors had a greater chance of recovering the ball and extending the possession.
Barnes and Quickley each grabbed 11 rebounds, while Barrett added six and several other Raptors contributed smaller totals.
This was not simply a center-driven rebounding performance. Toronto’s guards and wings were heavily involved on the glass.
Shooting comparison and what it means
At first glance, Oklahoma City appears to have had the better shooting night.
The Thunder shot 44% from the field, compared with Toronto’s 43%.
But the three-point numbers tell a different story.
Toronto:
- 12 of 34 from three
- 35.3%
Oklahoma City:
- 11 of 43 from three
- 25.6%
The Thunder took nine more three-point attempts but made one fewer shot.
That created an important efficiency gap.
Toronto did not need to win the overall field-goal percentage battle. It needed to avoid giving away too many possessions while making enough perimeter shots to punish Oklahoma City’s defense.
Quickley’s 6-of-10 shooting from three was the biggest individual difference.
Dort went 4-of-8 from deep for Oklahoma City, but the rest of the Thunder’s perimeter shooting was not consistent enough.
Free throws were another major difference
Oklahoma City was much better from the free-throw line.
The Thunder made 24 of 31 attempts, good for 77%.
Toronto made 17 of 26, or 65%.
That gave Oklahoma City a seven-point advantage in made free throws.
Normally, that type of edge can be enough to decide a close game. Toronto overcame it through rebounding, three-point efficiency, assists, and defensive activity.
This is a useful example of why one category should not be isolated from the rest of the box score.
Ball movement and turnovers
Both teams committed 11 turnovers.
That makes the assist comparison more interesting.
Toronto recorded 28 assists, while Oklahoma City had 21.
The Raptors therefore generated more assisted offense while committing the same number of turnovers.
Barnes was central to that difference with eight assists. Shead added five, while Ingram contributed four.
For Oklahoma City, Gilgeous-Alexander led the team with six assists. Wiggins and Dieng each added four.
Toronto’s ability to create more assists without increasing turnovers gave it a cleaner overall offensive profile.
Quarter-by-quarter analysis
First quarter: Oklahoma City establishes control
The Thunder won the opening quarter 30-25.
Gilgeous-Alexander and Dort helped Oklahoma City create early offensive pressure, while Toronto struggled to establish a consistent advantage.
The five-point margin was not large, but it allowed the home team to dictate the opening tempo.
Second quarter: Toronto changes the game
Toronto responded with its best quarter of the first half.
The Raptors scored 29 points while limiting Oklahoma City to 20.
The nine-point swing erased the Thunder’s opening advantage and sent Toronto into halftime with a 54-50 lead.
This period demonstrated the importance of Toronto’s depth. The Raptors received meaningful contributions beyond their primary scorers, helping them maintain offensive pressure.
Third quarter: Thunder respond again
Oklahoma City came out of halftime aggressively.
The Thunder scored 31 points in the third quarter compared with Toronto’s 25.
That six-point swing restored Oklahoma City’s lead.
At that point, the game had already featured multiple momentum shifts, and neither side looked capable of producing a comfortable margin.
Fourth quarter: Toronto wins the possession battle
The final period was not an offensive explosion.
Toronto scored 24 points.
Oklahoma City scored 20.
The Raptors did enough defensively to limit the Thunder’s late scoring, while Quickley delivered the decisive free throws.
The final margin was only two points, making every rebound, free throw, missed shot, and defensive stop more significant.
Why Toronto won despite Oklahoma City’s home advantage
The Thunder entered the game with a 20-5 home record, while Toronto was 16-9 on the road.
On paper, that made Oklahoma City the more difficult opponent to defeat in its own building.
Toronto nevertheless found a way to win through several complementary advantages.
1. Toronto dominated the boards
The 51-37 rebounding advantage gave the Raptors a substantial possession edge.
2. Toronto shot better from three
A 35% three-point rate was dramatically better than Oklahoma City’s 26%.
3. The Raptors moved the ball
Toronto produced 28 assists compared with Oklahoma City’s 21.
4. Barnes influenced the game everywhere
Barnes did not lead Toronto in scoring, but his 10 points, 11 rebounds, 8 assists, 1 steal, and 3 blocks showed his broad impact.
5. Quickley delivered the scoring punch
Quickley’s 23 points, 11 rebounds, and six made threes gave Toronto the perimeter production it needed.
The most important individual matchup
The most interesting statistical contrast was between Quickley and Gilgeous-Alexander.
Gilgeous-Alexander scored 24 points compared with Quickley’s 23, so the raw scoring battle was nearly even.
But their production came in different ways.
Gilgeous-Alexander shot 8 of 11 from the field and 8 of 10 at the free-throw line. Quickley shot 7 of 14 and 6 of 10 from three.
Quickley also grabbed 11 rebounds, while Gilgeous-Alexander had three.
That difference mattered because Toronto needed rebounding from its guards and wings to compete with Oklahoma City’s size.
The late-game contrast was even more important. Gilgeous-Alexander had a quiet fourth quarter, while Quickley converted the free throws that helped secure the victory.
What the plus-minus numbers reveal
Plus-minus should never be treated as a complete player evaluation, especially in a single game. Still, it can provide useful context when combined with the rest of the box score.
For Toronto, Barnes posted the team’s best plus-minus at +15, followed by Walter at +12.
Quickley finished at +2 despite leading the team in scoring.
On the Oklahoma City side, Dieng posted +17, Kenrich Williams +9, and Dort +3.
Those numbers show that some of the Thunder’s most effective stretches came with bench players on the court.
The final result, however, demonstrates why plus-minus must be viewed alongside shooting, rebounding, turnovers, and game situation.
Full Toronto player stat table
| Player | MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | +/- |
| Immanuel Quickley | 32 | 23 | 7-14 | 6-10 | 11 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +2 |
| RJ Barrett | 21 | 14 | 6-12 | 2-3 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | +2 |
| Brandon Ingram | 36 | 13 | 5-18 | 0-3 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -4 |
| Scottie Barnes | 32 | 10 | 3-8 | 0-2 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 2 | +15 |
| Sandro Mamukelashvili | 32 | 10 | 3-8 | 0-2 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -8 |
| Gradey Dick | 21 | 10 | 4-7 | 2-3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -3 |
| Jamal Shead | 24 | 9 | 4-9 | 1-5 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | +1 |
| Ja’Kobe Walter | 28 | 9 | 3-8 | 1-6 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 1 | +12 |
| Ochai Agbaji | 15 | 5 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -7 |
The NBA box score confirms Toronto’s team totals of 37 made field goals, 12 made three-pointers, 17 made free throws, 51 rebounds, 28 assists, 10 steals, and six blocks.
Full Oklahoma City player stat table
| Player | MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | +/- |
| Shai Gilgeous-Alexander | 35 | 24 | 8-11 | 0-1 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 2 | -3 |
| Luguentz Dort | 36 | 19 | 6-10 | 4-8 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | +3 |
| Kenrich Williams | 28 | 15 | 4-11 | 1-7 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +9 |
| Chet Holmgren | 29 | 11 | 5-10 | 0-3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -9 |
| Aaron Wiggins | 29 | 11 | 3-10 | 2-9 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 3 | -10 |
| Isaiah Joe | 22 | 10 | 3-9 | 2-7 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -1 |
| Jaylin Williams | 21 | 5 | 2-7 | 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | -5 |
| Cason Wallace | 16 | 3 | 1-3 | 0-2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -4 |
| Ousmane Dieng | 20 | 3 | 1-3 | 1-3 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +17 |
| Brooks Barnhizer | 3 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -7 |
The Thunder finished with 33 field goals on 75 attempts, 11 three-pointers on 43 attempts, 24 free throws on 31 attempts, 37 rebounds, 21 assists, five steals, and five blocks.
What the numbers say about Toronto’s offense
Toronto’s offensive performance was not built around one dominant scorer.
Quickley was the leading scorer, but Barnes contributed eight assists, Shead added five, Ingram had four, and Mamukelashvili recorded three.
That distribution helped Toronto survive inefficient stretches.
The Raptors also received 10 points each from Barnes, Mamukelashvili, and Dick, with Barrett and Ingram adding 14 and 13 respectively.
This balance made it harder for Oklahoma City to focus exclusively on Quickley.
Toronto also benefited from efficient three-point shooting. Quickley’s 6-of-10 performance was the centerpiece, while Dick went 2-of-3 and Barrett went 2-of-3.
What the numbers say about Oklahoma City’s offense
The Thunder’s offense was more efficient inside the arc, but the perimeter numbers were a major weakness.
Oklahoma City made 33 of 75 field-goal attempts, or 44%.
However, only 11 of 43 three-point attempts went in.
That 25.6% rate meant the Thunder needed to compensate elsewhere.
They did so partly through free throws. Oklahoma City made 24 free throws compared with Toronto’s 17.
Gilgeous-Alexander was also extremely efficient from the field, making 8 of 11 attempts.
But the Thunder did not receive enough consistent scoring around him.
Dort’s 19 points were valuable, and Kenrich Williams scored 15 off the bench, but the overall shooting distribution left Oklahoma City vulnerable to Toronto’s rebounding advantage.
Season series context
Toronto took the first meeting of the season series 103-101.
The second meeting later went Oklahoma City’s way, with the Thunder winning 116-107 on February 25, 2026.
That means the season series was split 1-1.
The first game therefore remains significant because Toronto handed Oklahoma City a narrow home defeat when the Thunder were 37-10 and had a 20-5 home record.
The second result provides useful context too. Looking at both games is more informative than using the January contest alone to describe the matchup.
Why this game matters when evaluating players
Single-game statistics can be misleading if they are treated as complete player evaluations.
For example, Ingram’s 13 points may appear modest, but he also recorded four assists, five rebounds, and two blocks.
Barnes scored only 10 points but had 11 rebounds, eight assists, and three blocks.
Meanwhile, Quickley’s 23 points were highly visible, but his 11 rebounds were arguably just as important in a game where Toronto won the rebounding battle by 14.
The same principle applies to Oklahoma City.
Gilgeous-Alexander’s 24 points were impressive, but the Thunder needed more late-game scoring from their primary offensive engine.
Holmgren’s 10 rebounds were useful, but Oklahoma City still lost the overall rebounding battle by a large margin.
A good box-score analysis therefore asks not only who scored the most, but also which statistical categories influenced the final result.
Frequently asked questions
Who led the Raptors in scoring against the Thunder?
Immanuel Quickley led Toronto with 23 points. He also collected 11 rebounds and made six three-pointers.
Who led Oklahoma City in scoring?
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander led the Thunder with 24 points. He also recorded six assists, three rebounds, one steal, and two blocks.
What was the final score?
The Toronto Raptors defeated the Oklahoma City Thunder 103-101.
Who had the most rebounds?
Scottie Barnes and Immanuel Quickley tied for Toronto’s team high with 11 rebounds each. Chet Holmgren led Oklahoma City with 10 rebounds.
Who had the most assists?
Scottie Barnes led all players with eight assists. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander led the Thunder with six.
How did Toronto beat Oklahoma City?
Toronto won through a combination of rebounding, three-point efficiency, ball movement, and late-game execution. The Raptors grabbed 51 rebounds to Oklahoma City’s 37 and made 12 three-pointers compared with 11 for the Thunder.
Conclusion
The Toronto Raptors vs Oklahoma City Thunder match player stats show why the 103-101 result was much more complicated than a simple scoring comparison.
Quickley was Toronto’s leading scorer with 23 points and delivered the decisive late free throws. Barnes supplied one of the game’s most complete performances with 10 points, 11 rebounds, eight assists, and three blocks. Barrett provided 14 points, while Toronto also received useful contributions from Ingram, Dick, Shead, Walter, and Mamukelashvili.
For Oklahoma City, Gilgeous-Alexander led all scorers with 24 points and shot 8 of 11 from the field. Dort added 19 points and four three-pointers, while Holmgren posted a double-double with 11 points and 10 rebounds.
The most important team-level difference was Toronto’s dominance on the glass. The Raptors collected 51 rebounds against 37 for Oklahoma City. Toronto also made 35% of its three-point attempts, compared with 26% for the Thunder.
Oklahoma City had advantages of its own, particularly at the free-throw line and in overall field-goal percentage. Yet Toronto’s combination of rebounding, passing, perimeter efficiency, and fourth-quarter defense proved enough to produce a two-point road victory.
The matchup is ultimately a strong example of why player statistics should be read as a complete picture. Points identify the leading scorers, but rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, shooting efficiency, turnovers, and late-game execution often explain why one team wins a close contest.
For the official box score and game record, the NBA official game page provides the underlying statistics.
