76ers vs detroit pistons match player stats

The 76ers vs detroit pistons match player stats tell a much deeper story than the final 116 to 93 score. Detroit controlled the game through efficient shooting, strong rebounding, ball movement, and a dominant opening quarter, while Philadelphia struggled to create enough offense after halftime. Tobias Harris led Detroit with 19 points, while Daniss Jenkins delivered one of the most influential all around performances with 16 points and 14 assists. For Philadelphia, Tyrese Maxey scored 23 points, Paul George added 20, and VJ Edgecombe finished with 19, but the 76ers could not maintain their offensive rhythm over four quarters.

One important data correction is necessary before examining the numbers. The official NBA record lists this game as taking place on April 4, 2026, at Xfinity Mobile Arena in Philadelphia, rather than April 5. The official box score confirms the 116 to 93 Detroit victory, the player statistics, the team totals, and the attendance of 19,746.

Table of Contents

76ers vs detroit pistons match player stats at a glance

Detroit finished with 116 points on 43 made shots from 87 attempts, good for 49.4 percent shooting. Philadelphia made 35 of 79 shots, or 44.3 percent. The difference became much larger from three point range, where Detroit converted 11 of 28 attempts while Philadelphia made only 8 of 29.

The Pistons also created a significant advantage on the glass. They collected 45 rebounds compared with 33 for Philadelphia. Their 16 offensive rebounds were particularly important because they generated additional possessions and helped Detroit maintain pressure even when individual shots did not fall.

Category	Detroit Pistons	Philadelphia 76ers
Final Score	116	93
Field Goals	43/87	35/79
Field Goal %	49.4%	44.3%
Three Pointers	11/28	8/29
Three Point %	39.3%	27.6%
Free Throws	19/24	15/19
Free Throw %	79.2%	78.9%
Rebounds	45	33
Assists	33	17
Turnovers	11	15
Steals	12	8
Blocks	4	2
Offensive Rebounds	16	10
Defensive Rebounds	29	23
Fouls	15	17

These numbers show why the result was more than a simple shooting battle. Detroit won in several connected areas at once. The Pistons shot better, passed the ball more effectively, protected possessions better, rebounded better, and generated more defensive activity.

Detroit Pistons player stats

=”font-weight: 400;”>Detroit’s starting group combined scoring with efficient possession management. Tobias Harris led the team in points, but the most interesting statistical performance came from Daniss Jenkins because his 14 assists directly reflected Detroit’s superior offensive organization.

Tob

ias Harris

e=”font-weight: 400;”>Tobias Harris finished with 19 points, 4 rebounds, 2 assists, and 4 steals=”font-weight: 400;”>. He shot 7 of 13 from the field, 1 of 3 from three point range, and a perfect 4 of 4 at the free throw line.

His 53.8 percent field goal percentage was one of the reasons Detroit remained efficient throughout the game. Harris also posted a plus 26, meaning Detroit outscored Philadelphia by 26 points during his minutes on the floor.

His contribution is easy to overlook when focusing only on scoring. Harris did not need a huge number of attempts to become Detroit’s leading scorer. Seven made field goals on 13 attempts gave him a strong scoring return without forcing the offense to revolve around him.

Daniss Jenkins

Daniss Jenkins produced perhaps the most important individual stat line for Detroit.

He recorded:

16 points
14 assists
4 rebounds
1 steal
1 block
1 turnover

Jenkins shot 4 of 11 from the field, including 2 of 5 from three point range, and made 6 of 7 free throws.

The 14 assists stand out immediately. Detroit finished with 33 team assists, so Jenkins was directly responsible for a very large portion of the team’s playmaking production.

His plus 25 also shows how effectively Detroit performed while he was on the court.

This is an important lesson when interpreting player statistics. A guard does not need to score 30 points to control a game. Jenkins created advantages through passing, helped teammates find efficient opportunities, and kept Detroit’s offense moving.

Jalen Duren

Jalen Duren finished with 16 points and 7 rebounds, shooting 5 of 8 from the field and 6 of 7 from the free throw line.

His 62.5 percent field goal percentage reflects an efficient interior role. Duren did not need to take a large number of shots because Detroit’s offense generated opportunities for him around the basket.

He also finished with a plus 15.

His seven rebounds contributed to Detroit’s 45 rebound total, which was one of the major statistical advantages of the game.

Ausar Thompson

Ausar Thompson scored 14 points and grabbed 5 rebounds while shooting 7 of 11 from the field.

That translated to a 63.6 percent field goal percentage, the best mark among Detroit players with significant offensive volume.

Thompson also recorded 3 steals and 1 block. His defensive activity helped Detroit turn stops into transition opportunities.

The combination of 14 points, 5 rebounds, 3 steals, and a block demonstrates why his value cannot be measured by scoring alone.

Duncan Robinson

Duncan Robinson added 11 points and shot 4 of 7 from the field.

His biggest contribution came from outside. He made 3 of 6 three point attempts, giving Detroit an additional perimeter scoring option.

That mattered because Philadelphia could not simply collapse its defense toward Detroit’s interior players. When Robinson converted from outside, Detroit’s spacing became more difficult to defend.

Paul Reed

Paul Reed led Detroit’s bench with 10 points and 7 rebounds.

He was extremely efficient, making 4 of 5 field goal attempts. Reed also added 2 steals and 1 block.

His plus 8 was another indication that Detroit received useful production from its reserve group.

Ronald Holland II

Ronald Holland II scored 11 points and grabbed 6 rebounds.

He made 4 of 10 field goal attempts and hit 2 of 3 three point attempts.

His six rebounds were valuable from the second unit because Detroit’s advantage on the glass was not limited to its starters.

Other Detroit contributors

Caris LeVert scored 7 points, grabbed 2 rebounds, recorded 3 assists and 1 steal.

Kevin Huerter finished with 5 points and 5 rebounds while contributing 6 assists.

Marcus Sasser scored 5 points and made his only three point attempt.

Javonte Green added 2 points.

Chaz Lanier played limited minutes and did not score.

Tolu Smith did not play because of the coach’s decision.

The overall picture is clear. Detroit did not depend on one player to produce everything. The team received scoring from multiple starters and reserves while also getting significant playmaking from Jenkins.

Philadelphia 76ers player stats

Philadelphia’s leading scorers were productive individually, but the team’s overall offensive structure did not generate enough consistency.

Tyrese Maxey

Tyrese Maxey led Philadelphia with 23 points.

He shot 8 of 17 from the field, 2 of 5 from three point range, and 5 of 7 from the free throw line.

Maxey’s 47.1 percent field goal shooting was respectable, and he was clearly Philadelphia’s most productive scorer.

However, he also finished with only 1 assist and 1 rebound. Detroit’s ability to limit the broader offensive impact around Maxey made it difficult for Philadelphia to turn his scoring into sustained team production.

His plus minus was minus 27, the lowest figure among the 76ers players with meaningful minutes.

That number should not be treated as an isolated judgment of Maxey’s performance. Plus minus reflects the team’s point differential while a player is on the court. In this case, it reflects how effectively Detroit controlled those stretches.

Paul George

Paul George scored 20 points, grabbed 5 rebounds, and recorded 4 assists.

He shot 7 of 14 from the field and was particularly effective from three point range, making 3 of 5 attempts.

That gave him a 50 percent overall field goal percentage and a 60 percent three point percentage.

George’s statistical efficiency was one of Philadelphia’s brighter points. The problem was that his performance could not compensate for the team’s larger offensive and possession problems.

He also finished with 3 turnovers.

VJ Edgecombe

VJ Edgecombe contributed 19 points and 6 rebounds.

He made 7 of 18 field goal attempts and 2 of 8 from three point range.

His scoring total was strong, but the 38.9 percent field goal percentage shows the difficulty he had converting his opportunities efficiently.

Edgecombe also recorded 2 steals and 1 block, providing defensive activity in addition to his scoring.

Andre Drummond

Andre Drummond finished with 4 points and 3 rebounds.

He shot 2 of 5 from the field.

For a player traditionally associated with interior rebounding, the three rebound total was modest, especially when compared with Detroit’s 45 total rebounds.

That did not mean Drummond alone caused Philadelphia’s rebounding deficit. Team rebounding depends on positioning, box outs, guards crashing the glass, and overall defensive structure. Still, Detroit’s collective advantage around the basket was significant.

Adem Bona

Adem Bona was one of Philadelphia’s most efficient players.

He scored 10 points on 5 of 5 shooting and added 4 rebounds and 2 assists.

His 100 percent field goal shooting was the best among Philadelphia players with multiple attempts.

The interesting part is that his efficiency did not translate into a large scoring role. Philadelphia needed more players to combine efficiency with volume as the game progressed.

Dominick Barlow

Dominick Barlow scored 8 points and grabbed 2 rebounds.

He made 3 of 6 field goal attempts and both of his free throws.

Barlow also recorded 2 assists, 1 block, and 2 turnovers.

Cameron Payne

Cameron Payne scored 6 points in 8 minutes and 30 seconds.

He made 1 of 3 field goal attempts and finished with 1 assist.

Jabari Walker and other reserves

Jabari Walker played limited minutes and did not score, while MarJon Beauchamp also finished scoreless.

Trendon Watford scored 4 points in limited action.

Justin Edwards did not score.

Kyle Lowry did not play because of the coach’s decision.

The bench distribution illustrates another major difference between the teams. Detroit received useful production from multiple reserves, while Philadelphia had fewer reliable scoring contributions outside its primary players.

The first quarter changed the shape of the game

Detroit opened the game with 41 points in the first quarter.

Philadelphia scored 31.

A 10 point first quarter advantage does not automatically decide an NBA game, but it immediately forced Philadelphia to play from behind.

The second quarter was much closer. Detroit scored 30 while Philadelphia scored 29.

At halftime, however, Detroit had created enough separation to take control.

The official game summary notes that Detroit used a 15 to 4 run to close the first half.

That sequence is important because it explains why the final score was not simply the result of four evenly played quarters.

Detroit built an early advantage, responded when Philadelphia pushed back, and then closed the half strongly.

The third and fourth quarters exposed Philadelphia’s offensive problem

Detroit scored 24 points in the third quarter compared with 21 for Philadelphia.

The fourth quarter was even more decisive.

Detroit scored 21.

Philadelphia scored only 12.

A team can recover from a poor first half if it generates efficient offense after halftime. Philadelphia did not do that here.

The 12 point fourth quarter is particularly important when analyzing the match because the 23 point final margin was created by sustained offensive separation rather than one isolated scoring burst.

Detroit continued to find productive possessions while Philadelphia’s scoring output declined.

Detroit won the shooting battle

The Pistons shot 49.4 percent from the field.

The 76ers shot 44.3 percent.

That is a difference of 5.1 percentage points.

The gap became more pronounced from three point range.

Detroit shot 39.3 percent from three.

Philadelphia shot 27.6 percent.

Detroit made 11 threes on 28 attempts, while Philadelphia made 8 on 29 attempts.

That means Philadelphia took one more three point attempt but made three fewer.

In a 23 point loss, no single statistical category explains everything. However, three point efficiency was an important part of the overall result.

Detroit also shot 79.2 percent from the free throw line, almost identical to Philadelphia’s 78.9 percent. Free throw shooting therefore was not a major separator.

The rebounding advantage was even more important

Detroit collected 45 rebounds.

Philadelphia collected 33.

That is a 12 rebound advantage.

More importantly, Detroit secured 16 offensive rebounds compared with Philadelphia’s 10.

Offensive rebounds matter because they can produce additional possessions without requiring a team to create a new defensive stop.

Detroit’s 16 offensive rebounds represented a significant source of second chance opportunities.

Philadelphia’s 10 offensive rebounds were useful, but they were not enough to offset Detroit’s overall control of the glass.

This is one reason box score analysis should look beyond points and shooting percentage. A team can survive a small shooting disadvantage if it dominates extra possessions. In this game, Detroit managed to combine shooting efficiency with extra possessions.

Ball movement separated the teams

Perhaps the clearest statistical difference was assists.

Detroit finished with 33 assists.

Philadelphia finished with 17 assists.

That is nearly double the Philadelphia total.

The difference becomes even more interesting when compared with turnovers.

Detroit had 11 turnovers.

Philadelphia had 15.

Detroit therefore created more assisted offense while also giving the ball away less often.

Daniss Jenkins was the central figure in that area with 14 assists.

The Pistons’ passing numbers suggest that their offense was not dependent on difficult individual possessions. The team consistently generated opportunities for teammates.

Philadelphia, by contrast, had four players reach double figures, but the team produced only 17 assists.

That combination suggests a more individual scoring burden.

Detroit’s defensive activity created extra pressure

Detroit recorded 12 steals and 4 blocks.

Philadelphia recorded 8 steals and 2 blocks.

The Pistons therefore produced more defensive plays that directly disrupted Philadelphia’s offense.

The turnover numbers tell the same story.

Philadelphia committed 15 turnovers.

Detroit committed 11.

The four turnover difference may appear modest, but combined with the rebounding advantage and better shooting, it contributed to Detroit’s control of possessions.

Detroit also scored 22 fast break points compared with 12 for Philadelphia, according to the official game summary.

That is another sign that Detroit’s defense was feeding its offense.

Why the plus minus numbers matter

Plus minus is often misunderstood.

It represents the team’s net point difference while a player is on the court. It does not mean that a player personally scored or prevented that exact number of points.

Detroit had several outstanding plus minus figures.

Ausar Thompson finished at plus 27.

Duncan Robinson was also plus 27.

Tobias Harris finished plus 26.

Daniss Jenkins was plus 25.

Jalen Duren was plus 15.

Those numbers are consistent with the broader team result.

Philadelphia had a more difficult set of numbers.

Tyrese Maxey finished minus 27.

Kelly Oubre Jr. was minus 28.

Paul George finished minus 9.

VJ Edgecombe was minus 9.

These figures should be interpreted alongside minutes, lineups, matchups, and game context rather than treated as independent player grades.

A closer look at Detroit’s offensive formula

Detroit’s offense worked because several components supported each other.

First, the team shot efficiently.

Second, it moved the ball.

Third, it attacked the glass.

Fourth, it converted enough three point attempts to prevent Philadelphia from concentrating entirely on interior defense.

Fifth, it protected possessions better than Philadelphia.

That combination is more meaningful than any individual scoring total.

The Pistons had five starters score at least 11 points.

Harris had 19.

Duren had 16.

Jenkins had 16.

Thompson had 14.

Robinson had 11.

That balanced scoring made it difficult for Philadelphia to eliminate Detroit’s primary offensive option.

A closer look at Philadelphia’s offensive formula

Philadelphia’s offense relied more heavily on a smaller group.

Maxey scored 23.

George scored 20.

Edgecombe scored 19.

Those three players combined for 62 of Philadelphia’s 93 points.

That means they accounted for approximately two thirds of the team’s scoring.

The concentration was not necessarily a problem by itself. Many NBA offenses rely heavily on star scorers.

The problem was that the supporting production and team creation were not enough on this night.

Philadelphia finished with only 17 assists.

Detroit had 33.

That difference suggests that Philadelphia needed more collective offensive creation to keep pace.

Why the bench comparison matters

Detroit’s bench produced several useful contributions.

Paul Reed scored 10 points and grabbed 7 rebounds.

Ronald Holland II scored 11 points and collected 6 rebounds.

Caris LeVert added 7 points and 3 assists.

Kevin Huerter contributed 5 points, 5 rebounds, and 6 assists.

Marcus Sasser added 5 points.

Philadelphia’s reserves had some useful moments, especially Adem Bona’s perfect shooting and Dominick Barlow’s 8 points.

But Detroit’s second unit contributed more consistently to the statistical profile that eventually produced the victory.

The lesson is important for evaluating team depth. Bench quality is not simply the sum of bench points. Rebounding, passing, defense, shooting efficiency, and possession control also matter.

Season series: Detroit swept Philadelphia

The four game season series was completely one sided.

Detroit won all four meetings:

Game	Result
Game 1	Detroit 111, Philadelphia 108
Game 2	Detroit 114, Philadelphia 105
Game 3	Detroit 131, Philadelphia 109
Game 4	Detroit 116, Philadelphia 93

Detroit therefore finished the regular season 4 and 0 against Philadelphia.

The margins were 3, 9, 22, and 23 points.

That progression is notable because the first matchup was competitive, while the final two meetings produced increasingly comfortable Detroit victories.

The NBA’s team matchup data also confirms Detroit’s four wins against Philadelphia during the 2025 to 26 regular season.

What the season sweep tells us

A four game sweep does not automatically mean that one roster is universally better than the other.

Matchups, injuries, availability, scheduling, and game circumstances all matter.

However, four wins do establish a meaningful regular season pattern.

Detroit consistently found ways to score efficiently against Philadelphia.

The Pistons scored 111, 114, 131, and 116 points in the four games.

That is an average of 118 points per game across the series.

Philadelphia scored 108, 105, 109, and 93.

That is an average of 103.75 points per game.

The final meeting was therefore consistent with the larger season series trend. Detroit’s offense remained productive while Philadelphia’s scoring dropped sharply.

The impact of player availability

Player availability is essential when interpreting this game.

The official NBA game summary reported that Philadelphia played without Joel Embiid because of right oblique injury maintenance and illness in the second half of a back to back.

That context matters.

A box score can tell us what happened, but it cannot fully explain why a team’s lineup looked different.

Philadelphia’s frontcourt options were therefore asked to handle responsibilities that would normally be distributed differently.

On Detroit’s side, the official report noted that both Jalen Duren and Tobias Harris had been listed as questionable before the game.

Both ultimately played and contributed important performances.

This is why responsible sports analysis should distinguish between the statistics of the game and broader conclusions about team strength.

What stood out most from the match

Several numbers deserve special attention.

33 assists for Detroit

This was arguably the clearest sign of Detroit’s offensive organization.

Thirty three assists on 43 made field goals means a very high proportion of Detroit’s baskets involved direct passing contributions.

14 assists for Daniss Jenkins

Jenkins nearly matched Philadelphia’s entire team assist total by himself.

That is an extraordinary playmaking impact for a single game.

45 rebounds for Detroit

The 12 rebound advantage helped Detroit create additional possessions and limit Philadelphia’s second chance opportunities.

39.3 percent three point shooting

Detroit did not rely exclusively on interior scoring.

Its perimeter shooting remained efficient enough to punish defensive overcommitment.

27.6 percent three point shooting for Philadelphia

Philadelphia’s three point accuracy was one of the clearest offensive weaknesses in the game.

12 Philadelphia points in the fourth quarter

The fourth quarter scoring collapse turned a competitive contest into a decisive victory.

What the player statistics do not tell you

Box scores are powerful, but they have limitations.

e=”font-weight: 400;”>The

y do not fully capture defensive positioning.

They do not show ever

y screen that created an open shot.

They do no

t record every successful closeout.

>They do not quantify how often a player forced a

teammate into a difficult deci

sion.

They also can

not fully explain lineup chemistry.

That is why a good player stats article should use the numbers as evidence rather than pretending that the numbers explain every tactical detail.

For example, Jenkins’ 14 assists clearly show elite playmaking production in this game. They do not independently tell us whether every assist came from pick and roll action, transition, post entry, drive and kick sequences, or another offensive action.

Similarly, Maxey’s 23 points clearly show that he was Philadelphia’s leading scorer. They do not prove that he played poorly.

The better interpretation is that his scoring was not enough to overcome Detroit’s collective advantages.

Statistical lessons for fans and analysts

There are several useful lessons from this matchup.

Do not judge the game only by the top scorer

Maxey scored more than every Detroit player except Harris, but Detroit won by 23.

The result demonstrates the difference between individual scoring and team efficiency.

Look at possession control

Detroit had 45 rebounds and 11 turnovers.

Philadelphia had 33 rebounds and 15 turnovers.

Those numbers reveal a substantial possession advantage.

Compare assists with field goals

Detroit made 43 field goals and recorded 33 assists.

Philadelphia made 35 field goals and recorded 17 assists.

The difference provides useful evidence about offensive ball movement.

Check shooting efficiency before raw attempts

Philadelphia attempted 79 field goals and Detroit attempted 87.

The Pistons did not simply win because they shot more.

They made more of their attempts and produced more efficient offense.

Consider context before interpreting plus minus

Maxey’s minus 27 does not mean he personally caused a 27 point deficit.

It means Philadelphia was outscored by 27 during his time on the floor.

The distinction matters.

How this game can be evaluated from an NBA analytics perspective

A useful analytical framework combines four areas:

Shooting efficiency
Turnover control
Rebounding
Free throw generation

These categories provide a quick way to understand possession quality.

Detroit had the advantage in field goal percentage, three point percentage, rebounds, offensive rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, and turnovers.

Free throw accuracy was almost identical.

That means Detroit did not need one lucky statistical category to win.

>The Pistons won across several connected dimensions.

Their

shooting created efficient scoring.

Their rebound

ing created additional possessions.

Their passing

created better shot opportunities.

>le=”font-weight: 400;”>Their defense created turnovers.

“font-weight: 400;”>Their lower turnover total prot

ected the advantages they had already established.

That is what makes this victory statistically convincing.

The biggest individual performances ranked by impact

If the goal is to identify the most influential performances rather than simply list the highest scorers, the order looks different.

Daniss Jenkins</li>

His 16 points and 14 assists gave Detroit exceptional offensive creation.

Tobias Harris</li>

e=”font-weight: 400;”>His 19 points, 53.8 percent shooting, and plus 26 made him a major contributor.

Ausar Thompson

=”font-weight: 400;”>His 14 points, 5 rebounds, 3 steals, 1 block, and plus 27 showed two way impact.

Jalen Duren</li>

His 16 points and 7 rebounds came with 62.5 percent shooting.

1. i> Tyrese Maxey</li>

</ol>

His 23 points made him Philadelphia’s leading scorer, although Detroit’s team defense limited the overall impact of that production.

1. > Paul George

His 20 points on 50 percent shooting and 4 assists represented one of Philadelphia’s most efficient offensive performances.

This ranking is not an official award list. It is an interpretation of how the statistical contributions connected to the final result.

What Philadelphia could have done differently

The statistics suggest several areas Philadelphia needed to improve.

First, the team needed better three point efficiency.

Eight made threes from 29 attempts created limited value from the perimeter.

Second, Philadelphia needed more ball movement.

Seventeen assists compared with Detroit’s 33 was a major gap.

Third, the 76ers needed to compete more effectively on the glass.

A 12 rebound deficit is difficult to overcome against a team that is also shooting nearly 50 percent.

Fourth, Philadelphia needed a stronger fourth quarter.

Scoring only 12 points in the final period prevented any realistic comeback.

None of these observations require speculation about coaching decisions. They are directly connected to the box score.

What Detroit did particularly well

Detroit’s strongest characteristic was balance.

The team did not need Harris to score 30.

It did not need Duren to dominate the glass by himself.

It did not need Jenkins to score 25.

Instead, multiple players performed specific roles.

Harris provided efficient scoring.

Duren provided interior scoring and rebounding.

Jenkins created offense.

Thompson contributed efficient scoring and defense.

Robinson provided perimeter shooting.

Reed and Holland helped the second unit.

That distribution made Detroit difficult to contain.

Final statistical verdict

The final score of Detroit 116, Philadelphia 93 was supported by nearly every major statistical category.

1. - Detroit shot 49.4 percent compared with Philadelphia’s 44.3 percent.
  - Detroit shot 39.3 percent from three compared with Philadelphia’s 27.6 percent.
  - Detroit outrebounded Philadelphia 45 to 33.
  - Detroit recorded 33 assists compared with 17.
  - Detroit committed 11 turnovers compared with Philadelphia’s 15.
  - Detroit recorded 12 steals compared with 8.
  - Detroit scored 22 fast break points compared with Philadelphia’s 12.

The official NBA game summary also records a 54 to 44 Detroit advantage in points in the paint and a 40 to 24 advantage in bench points.

Those numbers explain why the game became a comfortable Detroit victory.

The Pistons were not merely more accurate shooters. They were more efficient with possessions, more effective on the glass, more productive in transition, and much better at creating offense through passing.

Philadelphia had three major scoring contributors in Maxey, George, and Edgecombe, but the overall team structure could not match Detroit’s balance.

FAQs

Who led the Pistons in scoring against the 76ers?

Tobias Harris led Detroit with 19 points. He shot 7 of 13 from the field and added 4 rebounds, 2 assists, and 4 steals.

Who led the 76ers in scoring against Detroit?

Tyrese Maxey led Philadelphia with 23 points. He made 8 of 17 field goal attempts and 2 of 5 three point attempts.

How many assists did Daniss Jenkins have?

Daniss Jenkins recorded 14 assists along with 16 points, 4 rebounds, 1 steal, and 1 block.

What was the final score between Detroit and Philadelphia?

Detroit defeated Philadelphia 116 to 93 at Xfinity Mobile Arena in Philadelphia.

Which team won the rebounding battle?

Detroit won the rebounding battle 45 to 33. The Pistons also collected 16 offensive rebounds compared with 10 for Philadelphia.

Did Detroit sweep Philadelphia during the regular season?

Yes. Detroit won all four regular season meetings against Philadelphia during the 2025 to 26 season, finishing the series 4 and 0.

Conclusion

The 76ers vs detroit pistons match player stats show that Detroit’s victory was built on collective execution rather than one extraordinary scoring performance.

Tobias Harris led the Pistons with 19 points, but Daniss Jenkins may have been the most influential statistical player because of his 14 assists. Jalen Duren added efficient interior scoring and seven rebounds, while Ausar Thompson combined efficient shooting with defensive activity. Detroit’s bench also supplied useful production.

Philadelphia’s Maxey led all 76ers scorers with 23 points, followed by Paul George with 20 and VJ Edgecombe with 19. Their individual scoring numbers were respectable, but Philadelphia struggled to generate enough team offense.

The biggest statistical differences were Detroit’s 33 assists to Philadelphia’s 17, 45 rebounds to 33, 11 turnovers to 15, and 39.3 percent three point shooting compared with 27.6 percent for the 76ers.

The fourth quarter provided the final separation. Detroit scored 21 points while Philadelphia managed only 12.

Taken together, the numbers provide a clear explanation for the 116 to 93 result. Detroit controlled the game through efficient shooting, ball movement, rebounding, defensive activity, and better possession management. Philadelphia’s leading scorers produced useful individual numbers, but the team could not sustain that production across all four quarters.

For readers checking the official record, the NBA’s box score and game summary are the most reliable references for the final player statistics and game information. Official NBA box score and game summary