Green Bay Packers vs Detroit Lions Match Player Stats
The green bay packers vs detroit lions match player stats tell the complete story of how Green Bay opened the 2025 NFL season with an impressive 27-13 victory over Detroit in Week 1. While the final score reflects a comfortable Packers win, the individual performances reveal why Green Bay controlled the game from start to finish. Jordan Love delivered an efficient performance without committing a turnover, Josh Jacobs powered the ground game, and Green Bay’s defense consistently disrupted Detroit’s offense. On the other side, Jared Goff completed plenty of passes but struggled to generate explosive plays, while Detroit’s running game never found momentum.
For fans, analysts, fantasy football managers, and anyone interested in understanding what truly happened beyond the scoreboard, this breakdown explores every important performance from the matchup. From quarterback efficiency and rushing production to defensive dominance and special teams contributions, these statistics explain how Green Bay earned its first win of the season.
Game Overview
The NFC North rivalry between the Green Bay Packers and Detroit Lions once again delivered an entertaining contest, although Green Bay gradually separated itself as the game progressed.
| Category | Result |
| Event | NFL Week 1 |
| Date | September 7, 2025 |
| Venue | Packers Home |
| Final Score | Green Bay Packers 27, Detroit Lions 13 |
| Green Bay Record | 1-0 |
| Detroit Record | 0-1 |
Green Bay established control early by scoring ten points in the opening quarter before extending the lead during the second quarter. Detroit struggled offensively throughout most of the afternoon and managed only three points in each of the middle quarters before adding a late touchdown in the fourth quarter.
Quarter-by-Quarter Scoring
| Quarter | Detroit Lions | Green Bay Packers |
| First | 0 | 10 |
| Second | 3 | 7 |
| Third | 3 | 0 |
| Fourth | 7 | 10 |
| Final | 13 | 27 |
The opening quarter proved especially important. Green Bay’s fast start forced Detroit to chase the game, allowing the Packers’ defense to pressure Jared Goff throughout the afternoon.
Green Bay Packers vs Detroit Lions Match Player Stats: Complete Breakdown
When analyzing the green bay packers vs detroit lions match player stats, several numbers immediately stand out.
Green Bay excelled in nearly every critical category that often determines NFL games.
Packers Offensive Highlights
- Jordan Love threw two touchdown passes.
- Josh Jacobs scored on the ground.
- Zero turnovers committed.
- Efficient passing attack.
- Balanced offensive play calling.
Lions Offensive Highlights
- Jared Goff completed 31 passes.
- Sam LaPorta led all Detroit receivers.
- Isaac TeSlaa caught Detroit’s only touchdown.
- Running game averaged just over two yards per carry.
Although Detroit accumulated passing yards late in the game, Green Bay remained in control throughout most possessions.
Quarterback Performance Analysis
The quarterback matchup played a major role in determining the outcome.
Jordan Love Continues His Efficient Play
Jordan Love finished with one of the most efficient performances of Week 1.
| Statistic | Jordan Love |
| Completions | 16 |
| Attempts | 22 |
| Passing Yards | 188 |
| Passing TDs | 2 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Passer Rating | 128.6 |
Love completed nearly 73 percent of his passes while avoiding risky decisions. Although his total passing yards were modest, efficiency mattered more than volume. Every scoring opportunity was maximized, and he consistently made smart reads against Detroit’s defense.
Perhaps the most impressive statistic was his zero interceptions. Protecting possession remains one of the strongest indicators of winning football, and Love executed that responsibility perfectly.
His touchdown passes went to:
- Jayden Reed
- Tucker Kraft
Both scores demonstrated excellent timing and decision-making rather than relying solely on difficult throws.
Jared Goff’s Productive but Inefficient Afternoon
Statistically, Jared Goff accumulated more passing yards than Jordan Love.
| Statistic | Jared Goff |
| Completions | 31 |
| Attempts | 39 |
| Passing Yards | 225 |
| Passing TDs | 1 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Passer Rating | 88.6 |
At first glance, 225 passing yards appears respectable.
However, context matters.
Detroit frequently found itself trailing, forcing Goff to throw more often. His 39 pass attempts compared to Love’s 22 illustrate how game situation influenced production.
More importantly:
- One interception.
- Only one touchdown.
- Constant defensive pressure.
- Limited explosive passing plays.
Green Bay’s defense prevented Detroit from generating momentum when it mattered most.
Running Game Comparison
One of the biggest differences between both teams came on the ground.
Josh Jacobs Led a Balanced Packers Attack
Josh Jacobs carried the football 19 times for 66 yards while scoring one rushing touchdown.
| Statistic | Josh Jacobs |
| Carries | 19 |
| Rushing Yards | 66 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
While the average yards per carry was not extraordinary, Jacobs consistently converted manageable situations into positive gains.
His physical running style helped Green Bay:
- Control the clock.
- Maintain offensive balance.
- Wear down Detroit’s defensive front.
- Finish drives inside the red zone.
Those contributions often fail to appear in highlight reels but significantly influence winning football.
Detroit’s Ground Attack Never Developed
David Montgomery led Detroit’s rushing effort.
| Statistic | David Montgomery |
| Carries | 11 |
| Rushing Yards | 25 |
Detroit’s entire rushing offense produced:
- 22 carries
- 46 rushing yards
- Zero rushing touchdowns
Generating only 46 rushing yards made Detroit’s offense predictable. Once Green Bay realized the Lions could not consistently run the football, defensive coordinators were free to focus on stopping the passing game.
That imbalance ultimately placed additional pressure on Jared Goff throughout the contest.
Receiving Leaders
Although Green Bay threw fewer passes, its receivers made every opportunity count.
Packers Receiving Production
Romeo Doubs finished as Green Bay’s yardage leader.
| Player | Receptions | Yards |
| Romeo Doubs | 2 | 68 |
Touchdown catches were recorded by:
- Jayden Reed
- Tucker Kraft
The Packers demonstrated quality over quantity. Several explosive receptions helped create scoring drives without requiring high passing volume.
Lions Receiving Production
Sam LaPorta once again proved to be Jared Goff’s most reliable receiving option.
| Player | Receptions | Yards |
| Sam LaPorta | 6 | 79 |
Isaac TeSlaa added Detroit’s lone receiving touchdown.
Detroit actually finished with:
- 31 receptions
- 225 receiving yards
- One touchdown
Despite respectable receiving totals, many catches came underneath Green Bay’s defensive coverage rather than producing game-changing explosive plays.
The Packers were comfortable allowing shorter completions while preventing deep throws and forcing lengthy drives that often stalled before reaching the end zone.
Offensive Efficiency: Why Green Bay Controlled the Game
One of the biggest lessons from the green bay packers vs detroit lions match player stats is that raw yardage alone does not determine the winner. Efficiency, situational execution, and protecting the football often matter far more than total offensive production.
Green Bay demonstrated this throughout the game.
Although Detroit finished with more passing yards, the Packers converted scoring opportunities into touchdowns while limiting mistakes. Their offense remained balanced, allowing Jordan Love to throw when necessary and Josh Jacobs to keep the defense honest on the ground.
Detroit, meanwhile, became increasingly one-dimensional. With little success in the running game, the Lions relied heavily on Jared Goff’s arm, making it easier for Green Bay’s defense to anticipate passing situations.
Team Offensive Comparison
| Category | Detroit Lions | Green Bay Packers |
| Passing Yards | 225 | 188 |
| Passing TDs | 1 | 2 |
| Rushing Yards | 46 | 78 |
| Rushing TDs | 0 | 1 |
| Team Receiving | 225 YDS | 188 YDS |
| Turnovers | 1 INT | 0 INT |
This comparison highlights an important football principle. Green Bay did not need overwhelming offensive numbers because it consistently finished drives and avoided costly mistakes.
Defensive Performances That Changed the Game
Defense often wins close NFL games, and this matchup was an excellent example.
Green Bay’s defensive unit consistently disrupted Detroit’s rhythm, applying pressure at critical moments and preventing the Lions from establishing offensive balance.
Green Bay Defensive Leaders
The Packers produced one of the strongest defensive performances of Week 1.
| Category | Green Bay |
| Total Tackles | 84 |
| Sacks | 4 |
| Tackles for Loss | 9 |
| Quarterback Hits | 9 |
| Passes Defended | 2 |
These numbers reflect an aggressive defensive game plan that successfully attacked Detroit’s offensive line.
The standout performer was Edgerrin Cooper, who finished with:
- 12 total tackles
His performance demonstrated excellent instincts, consistent tackling, and an ability to impact both the running and passing game.
The Packers also recorded the game’s only interception.
Evan Williams Delivers the Only Turnover
Turnovers frequently determine NFL outcomes, and Green Bay’s lone interception proved valuable.
Evan Williams
- 1 interception
Although Detroit generally protected the football well, this takeaway halted an offensive opportunity and reinforced Green Bay’s defensive dominance.
Detroit’s Defensive Effort
Detroit’s defense played hard despite spending significant time on the field.
| Category | Detroit |
| Total Tackles | 52 |
| Sacks | 0 |
| Tackles for Loss | 2 |
| Quarterback Hits | 2 |
| Passes Defended | 1 |
The absence of quarterback pressure became one of the game’s biggest storylines.
Jordan Love faced relatively little disruption compared to Jared Goff, allowing Green Bay’s offense to operate comfortably throughout the afternoon.
Jack Campbell Continues to Impress
Detroit linebacker Jack Campbell was the Lions’ defensive leader.
His final stat line included:
- 10 total tackles
Campbell consistently found the football and prevented several gains from becoming much larger plays. Without his effort, Green Bay’s rushing attack could have produced even greater numbers.
Still, football is the ultimate team sport. Individual tackling performances cannot fully compensate for a defense that struggles to pressure the quarterback.
Special Teams Comparison
Special teams rarely receive the same attention as offense and defense, yet they often influence field position and momentum.
Both teams performed well in kicking situations, but Green Bay again held a slight advantage.
Field Goal Kickers
Brandon McManus
Green Bay’s kicker delivered a perfect afternoon.
| Statistic | Brandon McManus |
| Field Goals | 2/2 |
| Longest FG | 38 YDS |
| Extra Points | 3/3 |
| Total Points | 9 |
McManus converted every scoring opportunity presented to him, adding valuable points whenever Green Bay’s offense reached scoring range.
Jake Bates
Detroit’s kicker also performed efficiently.
| Statistic | Jake Bates |
| Field Goals | 2/2 |
| Longest FG | 30 YDS |
| Extra Points | 1/1 |
| Total Points | 7 |
Neither kicker missed an attempt, making this one of the cleaner special teams performances of the opening week.
Punting Battle
Field position can quietly influence the outcome of football games.
Green Bay received another boost through strong punting.
Daniel Whelan
| Statistic | Value |
| Punts | 3 |
| Total Yards | 164 |
| Average | 54.7 |
| Long | 65 |
A 54.7-yard average significantly helped Green Bay flip field position and force Detroit to begin several possessions deep in its own territory.
Jack Fox
Detroit’s veteran punter also delivered a quality performance.
| Statistic | Value |
| Punts | 3 |
| Total Yards | 142 |
| Average | 47.3 |
| Long | 55 |
Fox consistently gave his coverage team opportunities, although Green Bay’s offense generally managed favorable field position throughout the game.
Return Game Analysis
Neither team produced a game-changing return, but there were still notable differences.
Kick Returns
| Team | Returns | Yards | Average |
| Detroit | 5 | 116 | 23.2 |
| Green Bay | 2 | 39 | 19.5 |
Detroit handled more kick returns simply because Green Bay scored more frequently.
Punt Returns
| Team | Returns | Yards | Average |
| Detroit | 2 | 19 | 9.5 |
| Green Bay | 3 | 32 | 10.7 |
Both clubs generated respectable averages, but neither created a significant momentum-changing play.
Key Statistical Differences That Decided the Outcome
Looking beyond individual player performances, several team statistics explain why Green Bay earned a convincing victory.
1. Quarterback Efficiency
Jordan Love threw two touchdowns without an interception and finished with an outstanding passer rating of 128.6.
Jared Goff completed more passes, but one interception and fewer explosive plays limited Detroit’s offensive ceiling.
2. Defensive Pressure
Green Bay’s defense finished with:
- Four sacks
- Nine tackles for loss
- Nine quarterback hits
Detroit recorded:
- Zero sacks
- Two quarterback hits
This difference affected nearly every offensive possession.
3. Running Game Advantage
Although neither team dominated on the ground, Green Bay’s rushing attack remained productive enough to keep its offense balanced.
Detroit averaged just 46 rushing yards as a team, making its offense increasingly predictable as the game progressed.
4. Finishing Drives
The Packers consistently converted scoring opportunities into touchdowns.
Detroit frequently settled for field goals or failed to sustain drives when entering Green Bay territory.
5. Turnover Margin
The turnover battle favored Green Bay.
- Packers: 0 turnovers
- Lions: 1 interception thrown
In closely contested NFL games, protecting the football often becomes the deciding factor.
Player-by-Player Performance Grades
Statistics tell an important part of the story, but they do not always capture the overall impact each player had on the game. Based on the official numbers and each player’s influence on key moments, here is a performance evaluation.
Green Bay Packers
| Player | Grade | Analysis |
| Jordan Love | A | Efficient, accurate, and mistake-free. Two touchdown passes and no interceptions set the tone for the offense. |
| Josh Jacobs | A- | Controlled the tempo with physical running and added an important rushing touchdown. |
| Romeo Doubs | B+ | Made the most of limited opportunities with two catches for 68 yards. |
| Jayden Reed | A- | Produced one receiving touchdown and remained a reliable target in scoring situations. |
| Tucker Kraft | A- | Added another touchdown reception and helped stretch Detroit’s defense. |
| Edgerrin Cooper | A | Led all defenders with 12 tackles and consistently disrupted plays. |
| Evan Williams | A- | Recorded the game’s only interception, giving Green Bay a valuable takeaway. |
| Brandon McManus | A | Perfect on field goals and extra points. |
| Daniel Whelan | A | Outstanding punting average improved field position throughout the game. |
Green Bay received quality contributions from every phase of the game. Rather than relying on one superstar performance, the Packers won because multiple players executed their roles effectively.
Detroit Lions Player Grades
Detroit had several bright spots despite the disappointing result.
| Player | Grade | Analysis |
| Jared Goff | B- | Accurate on short throws but lacked explosive plays and threw one costly interception. |
| David Montgomery | C | Limited to just 25 rushing yards, largely due to Green Bay’s strong defensive front. |
| Sam LaPorta | A- | Detroit’s most productive receiver with six receptions for 79 yards. |
| Isaac TeSlaa | B+ | Scored Detroit’s only receiving touchdown and capitalized on his opportunity. |
| Jack Campbell | A | Finished with 10 tackles and remained active throughout the game. |
| Jake Bates | A | Converted every kick attempt. |
| Jack Fox | B+ | Solid punting performance despite difficult field-position situations. |
Although individual performances were respectable, Detroit lacked complementary football. Offensive struggles placed additional pressure on the defense, while the defense was unable to consistently slow Green Bay’s balanced attack.
Tactical Breakdown
Statistics become even more meaningful when viewed through the lens of game strategy.
Why Green Bay’s Offensive Plan Worked
Green Bay avoided unnecessary risks.
Jordan Love attempted only 22 passes, but those throws were carefully selected. Instead of forcing difficult passes into tight coverage, the offense emphasized efficiency, ball security, and smart decision-making.
Josh Jacobs’ steady rushing also prevented Detroit from focusing exclusively on stopping the pass.
This balanced approach created manageable third downs and helped sustain drives.
Why Detroit’s Offense Struggled
Detroit entered the game expecting to establish the run before opening the passing attack.
That plan quickly unraveled.
After Green Bay jumped ahead early, Detroit became increasingly dependent on Jared Goff’s passing. While Goff completed 31 passes, many were short gains that consumed time without significantly changing field position.
Without a productive rushing attack, Green Bay’s defense became more aggressive, frequently sending pressure and forcing hurried decisions.
Turning Points of the Game
Several key moments shifted momentum permanently toward Green Bay.
Fast Start in the First Quarter
Scoring 10 unanswered points in the opening quarter immediately placed Detroit under pressure.
Playing from behind limited the Lions’ offensive flexibility and forced them away from their preferred balanced approach.
Jordan Love’s Touchdown Passes
Both touchdown throws came at important moments, extending Green Bay’s advantage and preventing Detroit from building momentum.
Instead of long, mistake-filled drives, Green Bay capitalized when opportunities presented themselves.
Josh Jacobs’ Rushing Touchdown
The rushing touchdown demonstrated Green Bay’s ability to finish drives on the ground.
Successful teams often score in multiple ways, and the Packers combined efficient passing with timely rushing production.
Green Bay’s Defensive Pressure
Four sacks and nine quarterback hits continually disrupted Detroit’s offensive rhythm.
Even when Jared Goff completed passes, consistent pressure prevented the Lions from generating explosive plays.
What These Statistics Mean for Green Bay
Week 1 victories can shape the tone of an NFL season, and this performance offers several encouraging signs for Green Bay.
Jordan Love Looks Comfortable
Perhaps the most positive takeaway is Jordan Love’s efficiency.
A quarterback who completes passes at a high rate, protects the football, and delivers touchdowns without forcing unnecessary throws gives his team an excellent chance to win every week.
Balanced Offensive Identity
Green Bay demonstrated that it does not need to rely exclusively on the passing game.
With Josh Jacobs providing reliable rushing production and multiple receivers contributing, opposing defenses cannot focus on stopping a single offensive threat.
Defensive Improvement
Recording four sacks while limiting Detroit to just 46 rushing yards reflects a disciplined and aggressive defensive performance.
If this level of play continues, Green Bay could become one of the NFC’s most balanced teams.
What Detroit Can Learn
Although Week 1 losses are disappointing, they often reveal areas for improvement before the season progresses.
Reestablish the Running Game
Forty-six rushing yards will rarely be enough to win against quality opponents.
Detroit must create more consistent rushing production to reduce pressure on Jared Goff.
Improve Pass Protection
Allowing four sacks and numerous quarterback hits disrupted offensive timing throughout the afternoon.
Improved protection will help create more downfield opportunities.
Generate Defensive Pressure
One of the biggest statistical concerns was Detroit finishing without a sack.
Creating pressure forces quarterbacks into mistakes, and Jordan Love enjoyed a relatively comfortable afternoon because he was rarely hurried.
Historical Perspective
The Packers-Lions rivalry has consistently produced memorable games, but this matchup reflected a modern NFL trend: efficiency outweighs volume.
Detroit actually completed significantly more passes than Green Bay, yet the Packers controlled the game because they:
- Protected the football.
- Finished drives with touchdowns.
- Played stronger defense.
- Controlled field position.
- Executed better in key situations.
These are the characteristics typically shared by successful playoff teams.
Expert Analysis of the Matchup
Reviewing the complete green bay packers vs detroit lions match player stats reveals that Green Bay’s victory was built on disciplined execution rather than overwhelming offensive production.
Jordan Love did not need 300 passing yards because every drive emphasized efficiency over unnecessary aggression.
Similarly, Josh Jacobs did not need a 100-yard rushing performance to influence the outcome. His consistent gains kept the offense balanced and allowed Green Bay to control the pace of play.
Defensively, the Packers established themselves early by stopping Detroit’s rushing attack. Once the Lions became pass-heavy, Green Bay’s pass rush dictated the remainder of the contest.
For Detroit, the statistics suggest that the foundation of a competitive team remains intact. Jared Goff completed nearly 80 percent of his passes, Sam LaPorta continued to develop into one of the league’s dependable tight ends, and Jack Campbell led the defense with another productive outing. However, improvements in pass protection, rushing efficiency, and defensive pressure will be necessary against stronger opponents later in the season.
The official game statistics are available through the NFL, which provides comprehensive player and team data for every regular-season matchup.
FAQs
What was the final score of the Green Bay Packers vs Detroit Lions game?
The Green Bay Packers defeated the Detroit Lions 27-13 in their NFL Week 1 matchup on September 7, 2025. Green Bay improved to 1-0, while Detroit started the season 0-1.
Who had the best quarterback performance in the game?
Jordan Love delivered the more efficient performance. He completed 16 of 22 passes for 188 yards, threw two touchdowns, did not record an interception, and finished with a passer rating of 128.6. Jared Goff completed more passes and threw for 225 yards but had one touchdown, one interception, and an 88.6 passer rating.
Who led the rushing attack for both teams?
Josh Jacobs led the Packers with 19 carries for 66 yards and one rushing touchdown. For Detroit, David Montgomery was the leading rusher with 11 carries for 25 yards.
Which receiver recorded the most receiving yards?
Sam LaPorta was the game’s leading receiver with six receptions for 79 yards for the Detroit Lions. Romeo Doubs led the Packers with two receptions for 68 yards.
Which defensive player made the biggest impact?
Edgerrin Cooper was Green Bay’s standout defender, finishing with 12 total tackles. He helped lead a defensive unit that recorded four sacks, nine tackles for loss, and nine quarterback hits. For Detroit, Jack Campbell led the team with 10 total tackles.
What do the green bay packers vs detroit lions match player stats reveal about the game?
The green bay packers vs detroit lions match player stats show that Green Bay won through efficiency, balanced offense, and dominant defense. The Packers committed no turnovers, scored three touchdowns, generated consistent pressure on Jared Goff, and controlled the game despite throwing for fewer passing yards than Detroit.
Conclusion
The green bay packers vs detroit lions match player stats highlight far more than a 27-13 final score. They reveal how efficiency, disciplined execution, and complementary football helped Green Bay begin the 2025 season with an impressive victory.
Jordan Love’s mistake-free performance, Josh Jacobs’ productive rushing, and timely touchdown receptions from Jayden Reed and Tucker Kraft gave the Packers a balanced offensive attack. Defensively, Green Bay controlled the line of scrimmage, limiting Detroit’s running game while generating four sacks and constant quarterback pressure. Edgerrin Cooper’s 12 tackles and Evan Williams’ interception further demonstrated the defense’s impact.
Detroit showed flashes through Jared Goff’s accuracy, Sam LaPorta’s reliable receiving, and Jack Campbell’s defensive leadership, but the lack of a consistent rushing attack and limited defensive pressure prevented the Lions from mounting a serious comeback.
Overall, this matchup serves as an excellent example of how winning football extends beyond total yardage. Protecting the football, converting scoring opportunities, sustaining defensive pressure, and executing in critical moments ultimately made the difference and provided Green Bay with a well-earned Week 1 victory.
