Portland Trail Blazers vs Lakers Match Player Stats
The portland trail blazers vs lakers match player stats from the January 18, 2026 matchup tell a much more interesting story than the final 132-116 score alone. Portland defeated Los Angeles at Moda Center by controlling the glass, creating more second-chance opportunities, spreading its scoring across several players, and producing a strong third-quarter response when the Lakers tried to close the gap. Shaedon Sharpe led Portland with 25 points, while Jerami Grant and Caleb Love each scored 22. For Los Angeles, Marcus Smart scored 25 points, Drew Timme added 21, and LeBron James finished with 20 points, 9 rebounds and 8 assists. The official NBA record lists the matchup as a January 17 game in Portland, while the game information and reporting also identify January 18 in the overnight UTC date context. Official NBA box score and game details
Portland Trail Blazers vs Lakers Match Player Stats: Game Overview
Portland entered the game with a 21-22 record and a 12-10 home mark, while Los Angeles arrived at 24-16 and 13-8 on the road. Those records made the matchup more competitive on paper than the eventual 16-point margin suggested.
The Trail Blazers ultimately won 132-116 and took the season series 2-1. Portland had already defeated Los Angeles 122-108 on October 28 before the Lakers responded with a 123-115 victory on November 4. The third meeting gave Portland the decisive edge in the season series.
The game was played at Moda Center in Portland, Oregon, in front of 19,335 spectators.
The final score was built through four very different quarters:
| Quarter | Lakers | Trail Blazers |
| 1st | 27 | 40 |
| 2nd | 34 | 31 |
| 3rd | 29 | 36 |
| 4th | 26 | 25 |
| Final | 116 | 132 |
Portland’s 40-point opening quarter immediately changed the shape of the game. Los Angeles recovered in the second period, scoring 34 points, but Portland still went into halftime ahead 71-61.
The Lakers made another push in the third quarter. They reduced the deficit during stretches of the period, but Portland answered with 36 points. That response mattered because the Trail Blazers did not allow Los Angeles to turn the game into a one-possession contest.
By the fourth quarter, Portland had enough separation to manage the game rather than chase it.
Team Statistical Comparison
The team numbers explain why Portland won even though both teams shot the ball efficiently.
| Statistic | Lakers | Trail Blazers |
| Points | 116 | 132 |
| Field Goals | 42-85 | 45-86 |
| FG Percentage | 49% | 52% |
| 3-Pointers | 13-31 | 16-42 |
| 3PT Percentage | 42% | 38% |
| Free Throws | 19-21 | 26-34 |
| Rebounds | 27 | 42 |
| Assists | 25 | 24 |
| Turnovers | 15 | 15 |
| Steals | 8 | 9 |
| Blocks | 6 | 5 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 7 | 12 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 20 | 30 |
| Fouls | 25 | 17 |
One of the clearest differences was rebounding.
Portland collected 42 rebounds compared with only 27 for Los Angeles. That is a 15-rebound advantage, and it included a five-rebound advantage on the offensive glass.
That matters because offensive rebounds create extra possessions. Portland finished with 12 offensive rebounds, while the Lakers collected only 7.
The shooting numbers also deserve closer attention.
Los Angeles shot 49% from the field and 42% from three-point range. Those are respectable offensive numbers. Portland, however, made 45 of 86 field-goal attempts for approximately 52% shooting.
The Lakers actually had the better three-point percentage, but Portland attempted 42 three-pointers and made 16. Los Angeles attempted 31 and made 13.
Free throws provided another difference. Portland made 26 of 34 attempts, while Los Angeles converted 19 of 21.
The Lakers were more accurate at the line, but Portland reached the line more often.
Shaedon Sharpe Leads Portland
Shaedon Sharpe was Portland’s leading scorer with 25 points in 29 minutes.
His shooting line was:
- 25 points
- 9-for-18 from the field
- 4-for-8 from three
- 3-for-4 from the free-throw line
- 3 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 2 steals
- 2 turnovers
- Plus/minus of +20
Sharpe’s 4-for-8 shooting from three was particularly important because it forced the Lakers to respect Portland’s perimeter attack.
He was also one of Portland’s strongest players in terms of plus/minus. His +20 indicates that Portland controlled the game strongly during his minutes.
The most important part of his performance was not simply the 25-point total. It was the combination of scoring efficiency, three-point production, playmaking and defensive activity.
A player who scores 25 points while also contributing four assists and two steals gives his team several ways to win possessions.
Caleb Love Provides Scoring and Playmaking
Caleb Love produced one of the most complete offensive performances for Portland.
He finished with:
- 22 points
- 8-for-15 shooting
- 4-for-8 from three
- 2-for-2 at the free-throw line
- 1 rebound
- 7 assists
- 4 turnovers
- 2 steals
- Plus/minus of +23
The seven assists stand out.
Love was not simply another scorer next to Sharpe and Grant. He also helped create opportunities for teammates.
His four made three-pointers were equally important. Portland received perimeter scoring from multiple players instead of relying on one shooter.
The +23 plus/minus was the best mark among the players listed in the game data. That makes Love’s performance especially significant when evaluating his overall impact rather than looking only at his 22 points.
His four turnovers are a negative, but the seven assists and two steals helped offset some of that inefficiency.
Jerami Grant Adds 22 Points
Jerami Grant also scored 22 points for Portland.
His line:
- 22 points
- 6-for-12 field goals
- 3-for-4 three-pointers
- 7-for-9 free throws
- 3 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 1 turnover
- Plus/minus of +19
Grant was extremely efficient from three-point range, making 75% of his attempts from beyond the arc.
He also created value at the free-throw line, where he made seven of nine.
His +19 plus/minus reinforces the impression that Portland’s offensive success was not concentrated around one player.
Sharpe, Love and Grant combined for 69 points.
That is more than half of Portland’s 132 points.
Donovan Clingan Controls the Interior
Donovan Clingan’s numbers provide another explanation for Portland’s advantage.
He finished with:
- 18 points
- 7-for-14 shooting
- 1-for-7 from three
- 3-for-5 free throws
- 11 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 1 turnover
- Plus/minus of +16
The 11 rebounds were especially important.
Clingan produced a double-double while helping Portland dominate the overall rebounding battle. His four assists also show that his contribution was not limited to finishing near the basket.
There is one unusual part of his shooting line: he attempted seven three-pointers and made one.
That means his value should not be judged solely through his perimeter efficiency. His biggest influence came from his rebounding, interior scoring and ability to generate extra possessions.
Sidy Cissoko Gives Portland a Strong Supporting Performance
Sidy Cissoko scored 14 points in 29 minutes.
He shot 5-for-7 from the field and added:
- 1-for-3 from three
- 3-for-5 free throws
- 5 rebounds
- 1 turnover
- 2 blocks
- Plus/minus of +1
His 14 points were useful because Portland received meaningful production beyond its three leading scorers.
Cissoko also contributed five rebounds and two blocks.
That type of two-way contribution can become especially valuable in a game where the opposing team has high-level offensive players.
Portland’s Bench and Rotation Contributions
Robert Williams III scored 8 points and collected 6 rebounds in 17 minutes.
He was perfect from the field at 2-for-2 and perfect at the free-throw line at 4-for-4. His plus/minus was +6.
Toumani Camara contributed 9 points, 2 rebounds, 1 assist, 1 steal and 1 block in 26 minutes. He also shot 3-for-5 from the field and 2-for-4 from three.
Jrue Holiday added 9 points, 3 rebounds and 4 assists in 20 minutes.
Duop Reath contributed 5 points and 5 rebounds in 13 minutes.
Rayan Rupert did not score, going 0-for-4 from the field and 0-for-3 from three, but he recorded four steals in 21 minutes. Four steals are notable because defensive events do not always appear in a basic scoring summary.
Yang Hansen played only three minutes and finished without a point.
Javonte Cooke played one minute and recorded one rebound.
This distribution shows why the final score should not be interpreted as a single-player victory. Portland received contributions across the rotation.
Lakers Player Stats and Marcus Smart’s 25 Points
Marcus Smart led Los Angeles with 25 points.
His numbers were:
- 25 points
- 9-for-17 field goals
- 4-for-6 three-pointers
- 3-for-5 free throws
- 2 rebounds
- 2 turnovers
- 1 steal
- Plus/minus of -14
Smart shot approximately 53% from the field and 67% from three.
From an individual scoring perspective, that was an excellent performance.
The problem for Los Angeles was that Smart’s production did not translate into a team win. Portland’s broader statistical advantages were large enough to outweigh his scoring efficiency.
The game report also noted that Smart left the court during the fourth quarter after appearing to limp and did not return. That affected the Lakers’ available scoring and ball-handling options during the closing stretch.
LeBron James’ All-Around Contribution
LeBron James finished with 20 points, 9 rebounds and 8 assists.
His full line was:
- 20 points
- 6-for-16 field goals
- 1-for-3 three-pointers
- 7-for-7 free throws
- 9 rebounds
- 8 assists
- 1 steal
- 2 blocks
- 4 turnovers
- Plus/minus of -16
The 20-point total does not fully describe his performance.
James was close to a triple-double and contributed in almost every major statistical category.
His nine rebounds were tied with his strong passing contribution, while eight assists show how heavily he influenced Los Angeles’ offense as a creator.
The biggest issue was efficiency. He made six of 16 field-goal attempts, or 37.5%.
His perfect 7-for-7 free-throw shooting helped his scoring efficiency, but Portland still managed to build a substantial advantage while he was on the court.
The -16 plus/minus is also important context. Plus/minus is not a perfect measure of individual performance, but when combined with the team rebounding gap and Portland’s offensive production, it helps explain the overall result.
Drew Timme Provides a Major Spark
Drew Timme was one of the most interesting Lakers performers.
He scored 21 points in 29 minutes while shooting 9-for-12 from the field and 3-for-4 from three.
His complete line included:
- 21 points
- 9-for-12 field goals
- 3-for-4 three-pointers
- 2 rebounds
- 4 assists
- 2 turnovers
- 2 steals
- Plus/minus of -2
Timme’s 75% field-goal shooting was outstanding.
He also provided three-point shooting from a frontcourt position, adding another layer to Los Angeles’ offense.
His -2 plus/minus was much better than several other Lakers players, suggesting that the game was relatively competitive during his minutes.
That is an important distinction when analyzing player stats. A player’s scoring total can tell you what happened individually, but his other numbers can reveal how his minutes fit into the overall game.
Other Lakers Contributions
Maxi Kleber scored 11 points and added five rebounds in 21 minutes.
He shot 4-for-8 from the field and 1-for-2 from three.
Rui Hachimura also scored 11 points, shooting 4-for-7 from the field and 1-for-3 from beyond the arc. He added two steals and one block.
Kobe Bufkin recorded 9 points, 1 rebound, 1 assist and 2 blocks in 22 minutes.
Jarred Vanderbilt was efficient from the floor, going 3-for-3 and finishing with 6 points, 2 rebounds, 1 assist and 1 block.
Nick Smith Jr. scored 5 points and added 3 assists in 10 minutes.
Gabe Vincent scored 3 points but struggled with his shooting, making only 1 of 6 field-goal attempts.
Jake LaRavia scored 2 points but contributed five rebounds and four assists.
Dalton Knecht played only five minutes and made his lone field-goal attempt, a three-pointer.
Bronny James played eight minutes and finished without a point, recording one assist.
Chris Manon did not play due to a coach’s decision.
The Rebounding Battle Decided More Than the Shooting Battle
A superficial reading of the game could focus on Portland’s 52% shooting compared with Los Angeles’ 49%.
That difference matters, but it was not the entire story.
The more dramatic difference came on the boards.
Portland had:
- 42 total rebounds
- 12 offensive rebounds
- 30 defensive rebounds
Los Angeles had:
- 27 total rebounds
- 7 offensive rebounds
- 20 defensive rebounds
That 15-rebound gap gave Portland additional opportunities while limiting the Lakers’ ability to extend possessions.
Portland’s 12 offensive rebounds were particularly useful because they allowed the Trail Blazers to recover some of their missed shots.
This is one of the most practical lessons from the game. When two teams are both shooting close to 50%, possession volume becomes extremely important.
A team does not necessarily need to shoot dramatically better to win. It can also win by generating more opportunities.
Portland Won the Possession Battle in Important Ways
Both teams committed 15 turnovers.
That means turnovers were not the major reason for the difference.
Instead, Portland gained an advantage through rebounding, particularly offensive rebounding.
The Trail Blazers also generated 9 steals compared with 8 for Los Angeles.
The Lakers had more blocks, 6 compared with Portland’s 5, but blocks alone could not compensate for the rebounding disadvantage.
Portland also committed fewer fouls, 17 compared with 25.
The free-throw numbers were interesting because the Lakers were more accurate, but Portland attempted 34 free throws compared with 21 for Los Angeles.
Portland therefore benefited from both more free-throw opportunities and more offensive rebounds.
Why Portland’s Three-Point Volume Mattered
Portland made 16 three-pointers.
Los Angeles made 13.
The difference was only three made threes, but Portland attempted 11 more shots from behind the arc.
That volume gave Portland more opportunities to create high-value scoring possessions.
The Trail Blazers were not as accurate from three as the Lakers. Portland shot 38%, while Los Angeles shot 42%.
Yet Portland still produced more made threes because it attempted more.
This is a useful distinction when evaluating shooting statistics.
A higher percentage does not always mean greater total production. Shot volume matters too.
The First Quarter Set the Tone
Portland scored 40 points in the opening quarter.
Los Angeles scored 27.
That 13-point gap immediately placed the Lakers in a difficult position.
The Lakers did not collapse. They responded with 34 points in the second quarter while Portland scored 31.
But the first-quarter deficit meant Los Angeles had to spend much of the rest of the game trying to recover ground.
The halftime score was 71-61.
Portland’s 10-point lead was not insurmountable, but it gave the home team control over the game’s rhythm.
The Third Quarter Stopped the Comeback
The third quarter was arguably the most important period after Portland’s fast start.
Los Angeles scored 29 points, but Portland scored 36.
Instead of allowing the Lakers to complete a comeback, Portland expanded the lead.
This was a sign of offensive resilience.
The Trail Blazers did not need to rely on their first-quarter advantage. They produced another high-scoring quarter when Los Angeles increased its pressure.
That is one reason the final margin reached 16 points.
Injuries and Missing Players Matter to the Context
The game cannot be evaluated properly without considering availability.
Los Angeles played without Luka Doncic, who was unavailable because of left groin soreness. Deandre Ayton was also out because of left knee soreness.
Portland was without Deni Avdija because of a back injury. Matisse Thybulle was also unavailable because of right knee tendinitis, while Kris Murray was listed with a back muscle strain.
These absences changed the rotations on both sides.
Doncic’s absence was particularly significant because he had been the Lakers’ primary scoring option. The game report noted that he was leading the league in scoring at the time.
Portland was also missing Avdija, who had been averaging 26.1 points per game according to the game report.
That makes Portland’s balanced scoring even more notable. The Trail Blazers did not have their top scorer available, yet three players reached at least 22 points.
Season Series: Portland Wins 2-1
The matchup was the third and final meeting between the teams during the season.
The results were:
| Game | Result |
| October 28 | Portland 122, Los Angeles 108 |
| November 4 | Los Angeles 123, Portland 115 |
| January 18 | Portland 132, Los Angeles 116 |
Portland therefore won the season series 2-1.
The margins also show that the meetings were not identical.
Portland won the first meeting by 14 points.
Los Angeles won the second by 8.
Portland then won the final meeting by 16.
The third game was therefore Portland’s most decisive victory in the series.
What the Player Stats Say About Portland’s Offense
Portland’s offense was effective because it did not depend on one scorer.
Sharpe scored 25.
Love scored 22.
Grant scored 22.
Clingan scored 18.
Cissoko scored 14.
That gives Portland five players with at least 14 points.
This balance makes a defense’s job harder.
If one scorer is struggling, another can take on more responsibility.
The assists also tell an interesting story. Portland recorded 24 assists, only one fewer than Los Angeles’ 25.
The difference was not a massive advantage in passing volume.
Instead, Portland’s edge came from combining ball movement with rebounding, shooting volume and multiple scoring options.
What the Player Stats Say About the Lakers
Los Angeles had three major scoring contributors.
Smart scored 25.
Timme scored 21.
James scored 20.
That is 66 points from three players.
The Lakers also shot 49% from the field and 42% from three.
Those figures are strong enough to win many games.
The problem was the surrounding possession battle.
Los Angeles had only 27 rebounds.
Its seven offensive rebounds limited second-chance opportunities.
The Lakers also committed 25 fouls, compared with Portland’s 17.
So the Lakers’ offense was not completely ineffective. The bigger problem was that Portland consistently found additional ways to accumulate possessions and points.
Understanding Plus/Minus in This Game
Plus/minus can be useful, but it should never be treated as a standalone player rating.
In this matchup, the numbers provide some interesting context.
Portland’s leading marks included:
- Caleb Love: +23
- Shaedon Sharpe: +20
- Jerami Grant: +19
- Donovan Clingan: +16
- Toumani Camara: +12
For Los Angeles, the most favorable marks included:
- Gabe Vincent: +4
- Dalton Knecht: +3
- Kobe Bufkin: 0
- Drew Timme: -2
LeBron James finished at -16, while Marcus Smart was -14.
These numbers do not mean that Love was automatically better than James as a player. Plus/minus measures the team’s point differential while a player is on the floor, not a complete individual performance.
James’ 20 points, 9 rebounds and 8 assists clearly show substantial individual value.
The correct approach is to combine plus/minus with efficiency, rebounding, playmaking, turnovers and the game situation.
A Closer Look at Efficiency
Efficiency is one of the best ways to move beyond basic scoring totals.
Drew Timme’s 9-for-12 shooting was excellent.
Jerami Grant’s 6-for-12 shooting was solid, while his 3-for-4 three-point shooting gave him additional scoring efficiency.
Caleb Love’s 8-for-15 shooting and 4-for-8 three-point performance was also strong.
Shaedon Sharpe’s 9-for-18 shooting was exactly 50% from the field.
Marcus Smart made 9 of 17 shots and 4 of 6 three-pointers, making him one of Los Angeles’ most efficient high-volume scorers.
LeBron James, by comparison, made 6 of 16 field goals.
The contrast is important because Los Angeles needed James to carry more offensive responsibility without Doncic.
Why the Final 16-Point Margin Was Significant
The game was not a wire-to-wire blowout.
Los Angeles had stretches where it challenged Portland.
The Lakers scored 34 points in the second quarter and 29 in the third.
But Portland repeatedly responded.
The Trail Blazers established an early lead, survived Los Angeles’ best offensive quarter, and then produced another strong third quarter.
The final 132-116 score therefore reflected sustained execution rather than one isolated scoring run.
The Trail Blazers also reportedly extended the lead to 24 points late in the game.
That gave Portland enough control to close out the contest without needing a dramatic final possession.
Key Takeaways From the Match
The most important lessons from the statistical record are straightforward.
1. Portland’s depth mattered
Five Trail Blazers scored at least 14 points.
2. The rebounding gap was enormous
Portland won the rebound battle 42-27.
3. Offensive rebounding created extra chances
Portland collected 12 offensive rebounds compared with seven for Los Angeles.
4. Portland had multiple perimeter threats
Sharpe, Love and Grant combined for 11 made three-pointers.
5. LeBron still produced across the stat sheet
James recorded 20 points, 9 rebounds and 8 assists.
6. Marcus Smart carried major scoring responsibility
Smart led Los Angeles with 25 points and made four three-pointers.
7. Drew Timme was highly efficient
Timme scored 21 points on 9-for-12 shooting.
8. Portland converted more free throws by volume
The Trail Blazers made 26 free throws compared with 19 for Los Angeles.
9. Turnovers were even
Both teams committed 15 turnovers, so turnovers did not explain the final margin.
10. Portland won the season series
The Trail Blazers finished the three-game series with a 2-1 advantage.
Portland Trail Blazers vs Lakers Match Player Stats: Who Had the Biggest Impact?
If the question is simply who scored the most, the answer is a tie between Shaedon Sharpe and Marcus Smart at 25 points each.
But if the question is who had the biggest overall impact on the winning team, Sharpe has a strong case.
His 25 points came with four made threes, four assists, two steals and a +20 plus/minus.
Caleb Love also deserves special recognition because his seven assists and +23 plus/minus show how much he influenced Portland’s overall offense.
Donovan Clingan was another major factor because his 18 points and 11 rebounds helped Portland control the interior.
Jerami Grant provided efficient scoring, especially from three and the free-throw line.
For Los Angeles, Smart was the leading scorer, Timme was arguably the most efficient scorer, and James was the most complete all-around contributor.
That distinction is important. There was not one single statistic that explained this game.
Full Portland Player Statistics
| Player | MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | +/- |
| Shaedon Sharpe | 29 | 25 | 9-18 | 4-8 | 3-4 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | +20 |
| Caleb Love | 31 | 22 | 8-15 | 4-8 | 2-2 | 1 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 4 | +23 |
| Jerami Grant | 22 | 22 | 6-12 | 3-4 | 7-9 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +19 |
| Donovan Clingan | 27 | 18 | 7-14 | 1-7 | 3-5 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | +16 |
| Sidy Cissoko | 29 | 14 | 5-7 | 1-3 | 3-5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | +1 |
| Toumani Camara | 26 | 9 | 3-5 | 2-4 | 1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +12 |
| Jrue Holiday | 20 | 9 | 4-8 | 1-5 | 0-0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -3 |
| Robert Williams III | 17 | 8 | 2-2 | 0-0 | 4-4 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | +6 |
| Duop Reath | 13 | 5 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 3-3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | -3 |
| Rayan Rupert | 21 | 0 | 0-4 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | -2 |
| Yang Hansen | 3 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | -6 |
| Javonte Cooke | 1 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -3 |
Full Lakers Player Statistics
| Player | MIN | PTS | FG | 3PT | FT | REB | AST | STL | BLK | TO | +/- |
| Marcus Smart | 25 | 25 | 9-17 | 4-6 | 3-5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -14 |
| Drew Timme | 29 | 21 | 9-12 | 3-4 | 0-0 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | -2 |
| LeBron James | 32 | 20 | 6-16 | 1-3 | 7-7 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 4 | -16 |
| Maxi Kleber | 21 | 11 | 4-8 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -19 |
| Rui Hachimura | 19 | 11 | 4-7 | 1-3 | 2-2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | -11 |
| Kobe Bufkin | 22 | 9 | 3-8 | 1-5 | 2-2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Jarred Vanderbilt | 18 | 6 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | -10 |
| Nick Smith Jr. | 10 | 5 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 1-1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -5 |
| Gabe Vincent | 23 | 3 | 1-6 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | +4 |
| Dalton Knecht | 5 | 3 | 1-1 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +3 |
| Jake LaRavia | 28 | 2 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -10 |
| Bronny James | 8 | 0 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the leading scorer in the Portland vs Lakers game?
Shaedon Sharpe and Marcus Smart were the leading scorers, with 25 points each. Sharpe led Portland, while Smart led Los Angeles.
What was the final score between Portland and the Lakers?
The Trail Blazers defeated the Lakers 132-116 at Moda Center.
How did LeBron James perform against Portland?
LeBron James scored 20 points, grabbed 9 rebounds and recorded 8 assists. He also had 1 steal, 2 blocks and 4 turnovers.
Who had the most rebounds in the game?
Donovan Clingan led all listed players with 11 rebounds. LeBron James was next among the featured players with 9.
How many three-pointers did Portland make?
Portland made 16 three-pointers on 42 attempts, while Los Angeles made 13 on 31 attempts.
Did Portland win the season series?
Yes. Portland won the three-game season series 2-1, taking the October and January meetings while Los Angeles won the November matchup.
Conclusion
The portland trail blazers vs lakers match player stats reveal a game in which Portland’s collective performance was more important than any single scoring number.
Shaedon Sharpe led the Trail Blazers with 25 points, while Caleb Love and Jerami Grant each scored 22. Donovan Clingan added 18 points and 11 rebounds, and Sidy Cissoko supplied 14 points. The balanced attack helped Portland overcome the absence of Deni Avdija.
Los Angeles received strong individual performances from Marcus Smart, Drew Timme and LeBron James. Smart scored 25, Timme produced 21 on highly efficient shooting, and James came close to a triple-double with 20 points, 9 rebounds and 8 assists.
The biggest statistical difference was on the glass. Portland outrebounded Los Angeles 42-27 and won the offensive-rebounding battle 12-7. The Trail Blazers also made three more three-pointers, attempted more free throws and committed the same number of turnovers as the Lakers.
The 132-116 result therefore makes sense when the full box score is considered. Portland combined efficient field-goal shooting with greater possession volume, multiple scoring options and a major rebounding advantage. The victory also gave the Trail Blazers a 2-1 season-series win over Los Angeles.
