Charlotte Hornets vs Knicks Match Player Stats

The charlotte hornets vs knicks match player stats from the March 27, 2026 matchup tell a much deeper story than the final score alone. Charlotte defeated New York 114-103 at Spectrum Center, but the 11-point margin does not fully explain why the Hornets controlled the game for long stretches. Charlotte combined efficient shooting, a major rebounding advantage, strong three-point production, and balanced scoring to overcome a strong performance from Jalen Brunson.

The game featured several standout individual performances. Kon Knueppel led Charlotte with 26 points, 11 rebounds, and 8 assists, coming close to a triple-double. LaMelo Ball added 22 points, while Brandon Miller scored 21. For New York, Brunson produced 26 points and 13 assists, while Josh Hart contributed 16 points, 7 rebounds, and 5 steals according to the supplied game data.

The result was especially significant because New York entered the matchup with a 48-26 record and had won seven straight games. Charlotte improved to 39-34 and continued its push in the Eastern Conference. The game also demonstrated why individual statistics should always be viewed alongside team-level numbers such as rebounding, shooting efficiency, turnovers, and three-point volume.

Charlotte Hornets vs Knicks Match Player Stats at a Glance

Here are the most important numbers from the matchup:

Category	New York Knicks	Charlotte Hornets
Final Score	103	114
Field Goals	42-82	41-78
Field Goal Percentage	51%	53%
Three-Pointers	11-29	16-41
Three-Point Percentage	38%	39%
Free Throws	8-9	16-20
Rebounds	24	43
Assists	26	28
Turnovers	10	16
Steals	8	5
Blocks	2	4
Offensive Rebounds	5	12
Defensive Rebounds	19	31
Fouls	21	19

The most striking number is the rebounding difference. Charlotte collected 43 rebounds compared with only 24 for New York. That is a 19-rebound advantage, and it played a major role in giving the Hornets additional possessions.

The shooting numbers were much closer. New York actually shot 51 percent from the field, while Charlotte shot 53 percent. That tells us this was not simply a case of the Knicks missing everything. Instead, Charlotte created more opportunities and converted enough of them to build a decisive advantage.

The Hornets also made 16 three-pointers compared with 11 for New York. That five-made-three difference represents 15 additional points from behind the arc before considering the other differences in scoring.

The official NBA game summary provides the core result and quarter-by-quarter scoring for the matchup. NBA official game summary

Final Score and Game Result

Charlotte won the game 114-103.

The quarter-by-quarter scoring shows that the Hornets established control early:

Quarter	Knicks	Hornets
First	36	38
Second	19	27
Third	21	29
Fourth	27	20
Total	103	114

The first quarter was competitive, with Charlotte holding a two-point advantage. The second quarter changed the direction of the contest. Charlotte outscored New York 27-19, taking a 10-point lead into halftime.

The Hornets then extended their advantage again in the third quarter. Charlotte scored 29 points while limiting New York to 21. That gave the home team a 18-point advantage entering the final period.

New York did respond in the fourth quarter, outscoring Charlotte 27-20. However, the deficit had become too large to overcome.

This sequence is important when analyzing the game. The Hornets did not need to win every quarter. They needed to build enough separation during the middle portions of the game and then withstand the Knicks’ late push. That is exactly what happened.

Kon Knueppel Delivers an All-Around Performance

Kon Knueppel was the most complete statistical performer on the Charlotte roster.

He finished with:

• 26 points
• 11 rebounds
• 8 assists
• 6 made three-pointers

His scoring matched Brunson’s 26 points, but Knueppel’s influence extended beyond scoring. His 11 rebounds gave Charlotte another important advantage on the glass, while his 8 assists showed that he was also creating opportunities for teammates.

That combination is what makes his performance particularly valuable.

A player who scores 26 points through high-volume shooting can have a major impact, but a player who scores 26 while also contributing double-digit rebounds and eight assists affects several parts of the game.

Knueppel came within two assists of a triple-double.

His three-point shooting was also a major part of Charlotte’s offensive success. The supplied data credits him with six made three-pointers, while the official game recap also highlights his six threes.

From an analytical standpoint, his performance demonstrates why a simple points-per-game comparison can miss important details. Knueppel was simultaneously a scorer, rebounder, and facilitator.

That versatility made it harder for New York to contain Charlotte’s offense with a single defensive strategy.

Jalen Brunson Leads the Knicks

Jalen Brunson was New York’s primary offensive creator and finished with 26 points and 13 assists.

His 13 assists were the highest total among the players listed in the supplied data, and they show how heavily the Knicks relied on him to generate offense.

Brunson’s performance was particularly notable because Charlotte still managed to win despite allowing him to score 26 points.

This is an important lesson when interpreting player statistics. A high-scoring performance does not automatically translate into a team victory. Basketball is a possession-based team sport, and the opposing team can compensate for an individual scoring performance by winning other areas of the game.

In this matchup, Charlotte did that through rebounding, three-point production, and balanced scoring.

Brunson also helped New York maintain offensive pressure, especially early in the game. But Charlotte’s advantage in the second and third quarters created too much separation.

For the Knicks, the challenge was not simply finding more scoring from Brunson. They needed stronger collective production around him and a better response to Charlotte’s physical presence on the glass.

LaMelo Ball Provides 22 Points

LaMelo Ball finished with 22 points for Charlotte.

His scoring was important because it prevented the Hornets from becoming overly dependent on Knueppel.

When a team has multiple players capable of reaching 20 or more points, opposing defenses face a difficult decision. Focusing too heavily on one scorer can create open opportunities for another.

Ball’s 22 points complemented Knueppel’s 26 and Brandon Miller’s 21.

That gave Charlotte three players with at least 20 points.

This balance was one of the clearest differences between the teams. New York had Brunson leading the offense, but Charlotte consistently generated scoring from multiple primary options.

Ball’s ability to create shots and attack defensive gaps also helped Charlotte maintain offensive pressure during the middle quarters.

Brandon Miller Adds 21 Points

Brandon Miller scored 21 points and also contributed 8 rebounds.

His rebounding contribution is easy to overlook because his scoring was the headline number, but it mattered in a game where Charlotte dominated the boards.

Miller was one of several Hornets players who contributed beyond his primary statistical category.

His 21 points meant that Charlotte had three major offensive contributors rather than relying on a single player.

The combination of Miller’s scoring, Knueppel’s all-around production, and Ball’s offensive output gave New York multiple problems to solve.

Josh Hart’s Defensive Impact

Josh Hart produced 16 points, 7 rebounds, and 5 steals according to the supplied statistics.

The five steals were particularly notable.

Steals can change the possession battle quickly because they create opportunities without requiring a team to secure an offensive rebound. Hart’s activity helped New York remain competitive defensively even though Charlotte ultimately won the possession battle through rebounding.

Hart also led the Knicks in rebounds with 7.

That was a team-high according to the supplied game data, but it illustrates another problem for New York. Seven rebounds from the team’s leading rebounder is respectable individually, yet Charlotte collected 19 more rebounds as a team.

This is why team context matters.

A player can have a good rebounding performance while the team still loses the overall rebounding battle badly.

Knicks Starting Lineup Performance

New York’s listed starters were:

• OG Anunoby
• Karl-Anthony Towns
• Josh Hart
• Mikal Bridges
• Jalen Brunson

The lineup contained plenty of scoring, shooting, size, and defensive experience.

Brunson led the group with 26 points and 13 assists.

Josh Hart contributed 16 points, 7 rebounds, and 5 steals.

OG Anunoby was another important contributor, while Mikal Bridges and Karl-Anthony Towns were part of a starting group that entered the game with significant expectations.

However, the team-level numbers reveal that the Knicks did not get enough collective production to overcome Charlotte’s advantages.

New York shot an impressive 51 percent from the field, so field-goal efficiency was not the main problem.

The larger issue was possession control.

The Knicks collected only 24 rebounds and five offensive rebounds. Charlotte collected 43 total rebounds and 12 offensive rebounds.

That difference gave the Hornets more opportunities to attack.

Hornets Starting Lineup Performance

Charlotte’s listed starters were:

• Miles Bridges
• Moussa Diabate
• Brandon Miller
• LaMelo Ball
• Kon Knueppel

The starting group produced the foundation for the victory.

Knueppel led the team with 26 points, 11 rebounds, and 8 assists.

Ball scored 22 points.

Miller scored 21 points and added 8 rebounds.

The starting lineup therefore had three players reaching at least 20 points.

That kind of offensive balance is difficult to defend because the opposing team cannot simply overload on one player.

Charlotte also received meaningful contributions from other players, including Miles Bridges and the bench unit.

The result was an offense that could continue producing even when one player was not the primary scorer.

The Rebounding Battle Decided the Possession Battle

The most important statistic in this game may not be points, assists, or shooting percentage.

It may be rebounds.

Charlotte won the rebounding battle 43-24.

That is a difference of 19 rebounds.

The offensive rebounding numbers were also heavily tilted toward Charlotte:

• Hornets: 12 offensive rebounds
• Knicks: 5 offensive rebounds

Charlotte therefore had seven more offensive rebounds.

Those extra possessions can have a major impact on a game.

An offensive rebound can turn a missed shot into another scoring opportunity. It can also force defenders to work for longer possessions and create opportunities for kick-out passes or second-chance baskets.

This is particularly important when shooting percentages are relatively close.

If one team shoots 53 percent and the other shoots 51 percent, the difference is not enormous. But if the first team also generates substantially more possessions, the small shooting advantage can become much more meaningful.

That is essentially what happened here.

Charlotte’s Three-Point Advantage

Charlotte made 16 of 41 three-point attempts.

New York made 11 of 29.

Both teams shot at similar rates from three:

• Charlotte: 39 percent
• New York: 38 percent

The difference was volume.

Charlotte attempted 12 more three-pointers and made five more.

Those five additional makes produced 15 extra points.

This is an important analytical distinction.

A team does not necessarily need to shoot dramatically better from three to benefit from three-point shooting. If it creates more attempts while maintaining similar efficiency, it can generate significantly more scoring.

Charlotte managed to do exactly that.

The Hornets’ 16 made threes were a major part of their 114-point total.

Field-Goal Efficiency Was Not the Main Difference

The Hornets shot 41 of 78 from the field.

The Knicks shot 42 of 82.

That translates to approximately:

• Charlotte: 53 percent
• New York: 51 percent

Those numbers show that both teams were relatively efficient from the floor.

New York actually made one more field goal overall.

Yet Charlotte still scored 11 more points.

Why?

The answer is a combination of three-point volume, free throws, and additional possessions.

Charlotte made 16 three-pointers compared with New York’s 11. Charlotte also made 16 free throws compared with New York’s 8.

So although New York made one more field goal, Charlotte generated more points from outside the arc and at the free-throw line.

This is why box-score analysis should never stop at field-goal percentage.

Free-Throw Difference

Charlotte went 16-20 from the free-throw line.

New York went 8-9.

The Hornets therefore attempted 11 more free throws and made eight more.

Charlotte’s free-throw percentage was 80 percent, compared with 89 percent for New York.

The Knicks were slightly more accurate, but Charlotte had far more opportunities.

This is another example of why percentage alone can be misleading.

A team can shoot a higher percentage from the line and still lose the free-throw scoring battle because it gets fewer attempts.

Charlotte’s ability to get to the line more often added another layer to its scoring advantage.

Assists Showed Strong Ball Movement

Charlotte recorded 28 assists.

New York recorded 26.

The difference was not huge, but it supports the idea that both teams had capable offensive creators.

Knueppel’s eight assists were especially important for Charlotte.

Brunson’s 13 assists were even more impressive individually for New York.

However, Charlotte did not need one player to dominate the playmaking category because the team’s overall distribution was effective.

The Hornets received eight assists from Knueppel and still reached 28 team assists.

That indicates contributions from multiple creators.

New York’s 26 assists also show that the offense was not entirely dependent on isolation scoring.

The problem was that good ball movement did not fully compensate for the team’s disadvantages on the boards and from three-point volume.

Turnovers Tell a More Complicated Story

New York committed 10 turnovers.

Charlotte committed 16.

At first glance, this is an advantage for the Knicks.

The Hornets gave the ball away six more times.

Normally, limiting turnovers is an important part of maintaining offensive efficiency. However, Charlotte still won comfortably.

That tells us the Hornets generated enough extra value elsewhere to offset their turnover disadvantage.

Their 43 rebounds, 12 offensive rebounds, and 16 made threes were powerful counterbalances.

This is a useful lesson for anyone studying box scores.

There is rarely one statistic that explains the entire result.

Charlotte was worse in turnovers but better in rebounding, three-point makes, and free-throw scoring.

The overall combination favored the Hornets.

Defensive Activity From Both Teams

The Knicks recorded 8 steals and 2 blocks.

Charlotte recorded 5 steals and 4 blocks.

New York therefore generated more steals, while Charlotte protected the rim more effectively in the supplied team statistics.

The Knicks’ 8 steals also reinforce the idea that they were active defensively.

Yet the defensive activity did not translate into enough control of the game.

Charlotte’s offensive rebounding advantage meant that even when New York forced difficult possessions or missed shots, the Hornets frequently had the ability to recover the ball.

This is one reason defensive rebounding is so important.

A defensive possession is not fully completed until the defending team secures the rebound or otherwise gains possession.

Why the Second and Third Quarters Mattered

The game effectively shifted during the second and third quarters.

Charlotte outscored New York:

• 27-19 in the second quarter
• 29-21 in the third quarter

Across those two quarters, Charlotte produced a 56-40 scoring advantage.

That 16-point difference created the foundation for the victory.

New York’s fourth-quarter response was strong, but the Knicks could not erase the deficit.

This is a useful way to interpret the final score. Charlotte did not dominate every minute. Instead, it built its advantage during the middle of the game and then managed the late response.

The second and third quarters were therefore more important to the final outcome than the fourth-quarter scoring margin suggests.

What the Numbers Say About Charlotte’s Offensive Approach

Charlotte’s offensive profile was balanced.

The Hornets:

• Shot 53 percent from the field
• Made 16 three-pointers
• Made 16 free throws
• Recorded 28 assists
• Had three players score at least 20 points

That is a strong combination.

The most impressive aspect is that Charlotte did not have to sacrifice efficiency to increase its three-point volume.

The team attempted 41 threes and still shot 39 percent from that distance.

The result was a scoring attack that stretched the Knicks’ defense while maintaining enough inside production to remain efficient overall.

What the Numbers Say About New York’s Offense

New York’s offense was also productive in several areas.

The Knicks:

• Shot 51 percent overall
• Shot 38 percent from three
• Made 26 assists
• Committed only 10 turnovers
• Shot 89 percent from the free-throw line

Those are not poor offensive numbers.

The biggest issue was that Charlotte produced more scoring opportunities.

The Knicks scored 103 points despite shooting 51 percent from the field. That suggests they were reasonably efficient with their opportunities but did not have enough opportunities compared with Charlotte.

The rebounding deficit was especially damaging.

New York’s five offensive rebounds compared with Charlotte’s 12 meant the Hornets had more chances to recover missed shots.

Bench Contributions Matter in a Game Like This

The supplied data lists several important bench players for both teams.

For New York, the bench highlights included:

• Mohamed Diawara
• Mitchell Robinson
• Jordan Clarkson
• Jose Alvarado
• Tyler Kolek

For Charlotte, the listed bench highlights included:

• Grant Williams
• Ryan Kalkbrenner
• Coby White
• Josh Green
• Sion James

Bench production becomes particularly important when the starters are facing a physically demanding game.

Charlotte’s ability to maintain offensive pressure helped prevent New York from fully capitalizing on its late fourth-quarter push.

The supplied data also indicates that the Knicks’ bench was outscored 26-17, another advantage for Charlotte.

Why the Game Was More Competitive Than the Final Margin Suggests

An 11-point victory can sometimes look comfortable in a box score.

This game was more competitive than the final margin alone suggests.

New York entered the fourth quarter facing a significant deficit, but the Knicks outscored Charlotte 27-20 in the final period.

The late push showed that New York had enough offensive quality to make the game interesting.

However, Charlotte had already created enough separation.

This is why quarter-by-quarter analysis is valuable.

The final score tells you who won and by how much. The quarter breakdown tells you when the game was actually decided.

In this matchup, the second and third quarters were the turning point.

Key Statistical Takeaways

The most important lessons from the game can be summarized in several points.

1. Rebounding created extra opportunities

Charlotte won the boards 43-24.

That 19-rebound advantage was enormous.

2. Three-point volume created separation

Charlotte made 16 threes compared with 11 for New York.

The five additional makes were worth 15 points.

3. Knueppel was the most complete Hornets performer

His 26 points, 11 rebounds, and 8 assists made him the game’s most versatile statistical contributor.

4. Brunson remained highly productive

His 26 points and 13 assists demonstrated why he remained central to New York’s offense despite the loss.

5. Charlotte had balanced scoring

Ball scored 22 and Miller scored 21 alongside Knueppel’s 26.

Three 20-point scorers made Charlotte difficult to defend.

6. Shooting percentages were relatively close

Charlotte shot 53 percent and New York 51 percent.

The game was not decided simply because one team shot dramatically better.

7. Turnovers did not tell the whole story

Charlotte committed 16 turnovers compared with New York’s 10 but still won by 11.

Other statistical advantages outweighed the turnover disadvantage.

Charlotte Hornets vs Knicks Match Player Stats: Who Stood Out Most?

If the question is which individual performances mattered most, three Charlotte players and one New York player deserve particular attention.

Kon Knueppel was the standout because he contributed across scoring, rebounding, and playmaking.

LaMelo Ball provided 22 points and helped ensure the Hornets had another reliable scoring option.

Brandon Miller added 21 points and 8 rebounds, contributing both scoring and work on the glass.

For New York, Jalen Brunson was clearly the offensive leader with 26 points and 13 assists.

The contrast is interesting.

Brunson produced the game’s highest assist total, but Knueppel’s broader statistical contribution helped Charlotte win the overall matchup.

What This Game Reveals About Team Construction

The matchup also provides a useful lesson about roster balance.

Charlotte had multiple players capable of scoring 20 or more points and a player in Knueppel who could also rebound and create offense.

New York had an elite primary creator in Brunson and several experienced starters around him.

But the Hornets’ collective statistical profile was stronger on this night.

This does not mean one game proves one roster is better than another.

It means the matchup highlighted the value of having multiple pathways to victory.

Charlotte could win through shooting.

It could win through rebounding.

It could win through balanced scoring.

It could create offense through Knueppel and Ball.

That flexibility made it difficult for New York to eliminate every threat.

Season Series Context

The supplied data lists the following matchups:

Game	Result
Game 1	Knicks 129, Hornets 101
Game 2	Knicks 119, Hornets 104
Game 3	Knicks 103, Hornets 114
Game 4 listed in supplied data	Hornets 110, Knicks 96

The first three results show that Charlotte had already demonstrated an ability to compete with New York despite losing the first two meetings.

The March matchup was particularly important because Charlotte reversed the earlier pattern and defeated the Knicks by 11 points.

There is one date and season-series detail in the supplied dataset that should be treated carefully: the listed Game 4 is April 13, which occurs after the March 27 game. Therefore, it should not be used to describe the March game as if that later result had already occurred. The March matchup itself is independently documented as a 114-103 Charlotte victory.

That distinction matters when publishing sports content because chronological accuracy is essential.

How to Read Player Statistics Correctly

A good box-score analysis should answer more than “Who scored the most?”

When reviewing a matchup like this, look at five layers.

Scoring

Points identify who converted possessions into offense.

In this game, Knueppel and Brunson both scored 26.

Efficiency

Field-goal and three-point percentages help explain how efficiently those points were produced.

Charlotte shot 53 percent overall and 39 percent from three.

Possession control

Rebounds and turnovers help explain how many opportunities each team received.

Charlotte’s 43 rebounds were particularly important.

Playmaking

Assists show how much players contributed to creating scoring opportunities for teammates.

Brunson’s 13 and Knueppel’s 8 were standout individual totals.

Defensive activity

Steals and blocks provide additional context about defensive disruption.

Hart’s five steals led the Knicks in the supplied data, while Charlotte finished with four team blocks.

Looking at all five categories produces a much clearer picture than focusing only on scoring.

Practical Lessons for Future Matchup Analysis

Anyone analyzing future NBA games can use this matchup as a simple framework.

Start with the final score.

Then compare shooting percentages.

Next, examine three-point attempts and makes.

After that, look at the rebounding margin.

Then compare turnovers, assists, free throws, steals, and blocks.

Finally, examine the quarter-by-quarter scoring.

This process prevents one statistic from dominating the analysis.

For example, if someone looked only at turnovers in this game, they might conclude New York had the advantage because the Knicks committed six fewer turnovers.

But the broader analysis shows that Charlotte dominated the rebounding battle and made five more three-pointers.

That is why statistical context matters.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who was the top scorer in the Charlotte vs Knicks game?

Kon Knueppel and Jalen Brunson both scored 26 points. Knueppel also recorded 11 rebounds and 8 assists for Charlotte, while Brunson finished with 13 assists for New York.

Who won the Charlotte Hornets vs New York Knicks game?

The Charlotte Hornets defeated the New York Knicks 114-103 at Spectrum Center.

How many points did LaMelo Ball score against the Knicks?

LaMelo Ball scored 22 points for Charlotte.

How many points did Brandon Miller score?

Brandon Miller scored 21 points and also recorded 8 rebounds according to the supplied game data.

Who had the most assists?

Jalen Brunson led all listed players with 13 assists. Kon Knueppel led Charlotte with 8 assists.

Which team won the rebounding battle?

Charlotte won the rebounding battle decisively, collecting 43 rebounds compared with 24 for New York.

Conclusion

The charlotte hornets vs knicks match player stats show why the Hornets were able to defeat a team that entered the game with a 48-26 record.

Charlotte’s victory was built on several connected advantages rather than one isolated performance.

Kon Knueppel was the headline performer with 26 points, 11 rebounds, and 8 assists. LaMelo Ball added 22 points, while Brandon Miller contributed 21 points and 8 rebounds. Together, those performances gave Charlotte three players with at least 20 points.

Jalen Brunson was equally important for New York from an individual perspective. His 26 points and 13 assists demonstrated his role as the Knicks’ primary offensive engine. Josh Hart also contributed 16 points, 7 rebounds, and 5 steals.

The biggest team-level difference was rebounding. Charlotte collected 43 boards compared with 24 for New York. The Hornets also secured a significant advantage in offensive rebounds, three-point makes, and free-throw scoring.

Interestingly, the Knicks shot 51 percent from the field, only two percentage points below Charlotte’s 53 percent. That shows the loss was not simply a result of poor shooting. Charlotte generated more opportunities and converted enough of them to turn those extra possessions into a double-digit victory.

The quarter-by-quarter numbers provide the final piece of the puzzle. The Hornets created their separation in the second and third quarters, building a lead that New York could not erase despite winning the fourth quarter 27-20.

For readers studying NBA box scores, this matchup is a useful example of why individual player numbers should always be considered alongside team statistics. Points tell you who scored. Rebounds tell you who controlled missed shots. Assists reveal creation. Three-point numbers show spacing and shot volume. Turnovers reveal possession losses. When those categories are considered together, the reasons behind a result become much easier to understand.