Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chargers Match Player Stats

Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chargers match player stats from the November 9, 2025 meeting show how Los Angeles turned a 25-10 victory into a controlled defensive and offensive performance. The Chargers finished with 314 total yards compared with Pittsburgh’s 221, while Justin Herbert completed 20 of 33 passes for 220 yards and one touchdown without an interception. Aaron Rodgers completed 16 of 31 passes for 161 yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions. The official NFL game record confirms the 25-10 final score at SoFi Stadium.

The final score does not fully explain how the game developed. Pittsburgh opened the scoring with a 59-yard Chris Boswell field goal, but Los Angeles answered with a safety, two field goals, a passing touchdown, and a rushing touchdown. The Chargers also produced two interceptions and controlled the ball for 37:35, compared with 22:25 for Pittsburgh.

For readers looking for a complete player-by-player breakdown, this game offers several useful points of comparison. Herbert was more efficient through the air, Kimani Vidal provided the Chargers with a steady rushing workload, Ladd McConkey created the game’s biggest receiving play, and the Los Angeles defense repeatedly disrupted Pittsburgh’s passing game.

Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chargers match player stats: Game overview

The Steelers entered the game with a 5-4 record and a 2-2 road mark. Los Angeles entered at 7-3 with a 4-2 home record.

The game was played on November 9, 2025, at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood, California. The Chargers won 25-10.

The scoring progression explains the changing shape of the contest:

• Pittsburgh scored 3 points in the first quarter.
• Los Angeles scored 2 points in the first quarter.
• Los Angeles scored 10 points in the second quarter.
• Los Angeles added 3 points in the third quarter.
• Los Angeles scored 10 points in the fourth quarter.
• Pittsburgh scored its only touchdown late in the fourth quarter.

The Steelers therefore led 3-2 after one quarter but did not score again until the final quarter.

Los Angeles created separation in the second quarter and maintained it through the remainder of the game. Pittsburgh’s late touchdown reduced the final margin, but it came with only 2:57 remaining.

The Chargers finished with 18 first downs, while Pittsburgh recorded 11. Los Angeles also converted 6 of 17 third downs, compared with 2 of 11 for Pittsburgh.

Those numbers are important because they show that the result was not simply determined by one explosive play. Los Angeles consistently produced more sustained offensive possessions.

Quarter-by-quarter scoring breakdown

First quarter

Pittsburgh started the scoring with Chris Boswell’s 59-yard field goal. The kick gave the Steelers a 3-0 lead.

Los Angeles responded with a safety to make the score 3-2.

The safety was significant because it gave the Chargers points without requiring a touchdown drive. It also prevented Pittsburgh from carrying its early lead into the second quarter.

Second quarter

Cameron Dicker tied the game with a 32-yard field goal.

The Chargers then moved into the lead when Justin Herbert connected with Ladd McConkey for a 15-yard touchdown.

At halftime, Los Angeles led 12-3.

That nine-point advantage was built through a combination of field-position pressure and an efficient scoring sequence rather than repeated long touchdown drives.

Third quarter

Dicker added another field goal, this time from 59 yards.

The kick extended Los Angeles’ advantage to 15-3.

Pittsburgh remained within two possessions, but its offense could not produce a scoring drive during the quarter.

Fourth quarter

The Chargers opened the final quarter with their second touchdown.

Kimani Vidal scored on a 2-yard rushing attempt, putting Los Angeles ahead 22-3.

Dicker later added a 42-yard field goal, giving the Chargers a 25-3 advantage.

Pittsburgh finally found the end zone when Aaron Rodgers threw a 27-yard touchdown pass to Roman Wilson with 2:57 remaining.

The Steelers did not have enough time to mount a comeback, and the Chargers finished with a 25-10 victory.

Pittsburgh Steelers passing statistics

Aaron Rodgers was Pittsburgh’s primary passer and completed 16 of 31 attempts for 161 passing yards.

His passing line included:

Statistic	Aaron Rodgers
Completions	16
Attempts	31
Completion rate	51.6%
Passing yards	161
Yards per attempt	5.2
Touchdowns	1
Interceptions	2
Sacks	3
Sack yards lost	13
QBR	4.2
Passer rating	50.6

The 16 completions produced 161 gross passing yards, but three sacks cost Pittsburgh 13 yards. The official team statistics list Pittsburgh with 148 net passing yards after sack yardage.

Rodgers’ 5.2 yards per attempt also indicates that Pittsburgh did not consistently generate large gains through the passing game.

The two interceptions were particularly damaging because Los Angeles finished the game without throwing an interception.

Pittsburgh also had difficulty sustaining drives. The Steelers converted only 2 of 11 third-down opportunities.

That third-down number helps explain why 161 passing yards did not translate into a competitive offensive total.

Justin Herbert’s passing performance

Justin Herbert completed 20 of 33 passes for 220 yards and one touchdown.

His statistical line was:

Statistic	Justin Herbert
Completions	20
Attempts	33
Completion rate	60.6%
Passing yards	220
Yards per attempt	6.7
Touchdowns	1
Interceptions	0
Sacks	5
Sack yards lost	21
QBR	30.5
Passer rating	90.5

Herbert’s 220 gross passing yards became 199 net passing yards after the Chargers lost 21 yards on five sacks.

That distinction matters when examining the overall offensive production. Los Angeles still finished with 314 total net yards because its rushing attack added another 115 yards.

Herbert also avoided turnovers through the air. That gave the Chargers a major advantage in possession security.

Although Pittsburgh recorded five sacks, Los Angeles continued to generate enough offense to control the game.

Pittsburgh rushing statistics

Pittsburgh’s running game was led by Jaylen Warren.

Player	Carries	Yards	Average	TD	Long
Jaylen Warren	14	70	5.0	0	14
Kaleb Johnson	2	3	1.5	0	5
Team	16	73	4.6	0	14

Warren accounted for 14 of Pittsburgh’s 16 rushing attempts and 70 of its 73 rushing yards.

His 5.0 yards per carry was the strongest rushing efficiency on either team among players with a substantial workload.

The problem was volume.

Pittsburgh ran the ball only 16 times. Los Angeles ran 31 rushing plays.

That difference gave the Chargers substantially more opportunities to control possession and keep their defense fresh.

Pittsburgh averaged 4.6 yards per rushing attempt as a team, which was actually higher than Los Angeles’ 3.7 average. However, the Chargers had 115 rushing yards because they carried the ball almost twice as often.

This is an important lesson when reading football box scores: rushing efficiency and rushing production are related, but they are not identical.

Kimani Vidal’s rushing impact

Kimani Vidal carried the ball 25 times for 95 yards and one touchdown.

Statistic	Kimani Vidal
Carries	25
Rushing yards	95
Average	3.8
Touchdowns	1
Long run	12 yards

Vidal’s 25 carries represented the largest rushing workload of the game.

He did not need a huge average to influence the game. His 3.8 yards per carry was enough to consistently keep the Chargers moving while Herbert handled the passing game.

His most important rushing play came in the fourth quarter when he scored on a 2-yard run.

That touchdown extended the Chargers’ lead to 22-3 and effectively removed the possibility of a realistic Pittsburgh comeback.

Vidal also contributed as a receiver, catching one pass for 13 yards.

Justin Herbert’s rushing contribution

Herbert was also useful on the ground.

He carried five times for 19 yards, averaging 3.8 yards per attempt. His longest run was 15 yards.

That contribution gave Los Angeles another way to gain yardage when passing opportunities were limited.

The Chargers therefore finished with three primary rushing contributors:

• Vidal with 95 yards
• Herbert with 19 yards
• Jaret Patterson with 1 yard

Together, they produced 115 rushing yards on 31 attempts.

Pittsburgh receiving statistics

Pittsburgh completed 16 passes for 161 receiving yards and one touchdown.

The receiving distribution was:

Player	Receptions	Yards	Average	TD	Long	Targets
Roman Wilson	2	35	17.5	1	27	3
DK Metcalf	3	35	11.7	0	19	7
Pat Freiermuth	3	33	11.0	0	15	3
Jaylen Warren	2	21	10.5	0	18	2
Darnell Washington	1	15	15.0	0	15	1
Calvin Austin III	2	14	7.0	0	8	7
Jonnu Smith	1	4	4.0	0	4	2
Kenneth Gainwell	2	4	2.0	0	2	3
Team	16	161	10.1	1	19	28

Roman Wilson finished as Pittsburgh’s touchdown receiver.

His two receptions produced 35 yards, including a 27-yard touchdown that accounted for Pittsburgh’s only touchdown of the night.

DK Metcalf and Pat Freiermuth each recorded three receptions.

Metcalf received seven targets and finished with 35 yards.

Freiermuth also caught three passes, gaining 33 yards.

Calvin Austin III received seven targets as well but finished with 14 yards on two receptions.

That contrast illustrates how target volume does not automatically translate into receiving production.

Roman Wilson’s touchdown

Roman Wilson’s 27-yard touchdown was Pittsburgh’s biggest scoring play.

It came with 2:57 remaining in the fourth quarter and reduced the Chargers’ lead to 25-10.

Wilson finished with only two receptions, but one became a touchdown and the other contributed to his 35 receiving yards.

His 17.5 yards per reception was the highest average among Pittsburgh players with multiple catches.

From a box-score perspective, Wilson’s numbers were limited in volume but significant in scoring impact.

DK Metcalf and Pat Freiermuth

DK Metcalf caught three passes for 35 yards from seven targets.

His longest reception covered 19 yards.

Pat Freiermuth also caught three passes, gaining 33 yards on three targets.

Freiermuth’s 11.0 yards per reception was slightly lower than Metcalf’s 11.7, but his catch rate was perfect on the listed targets.

Together, they provided 68 receiving yards.

However, neither player scored, and Pittsburgh’s passing offense remained limited for most of the game.

Los Angeles Chargers receiving statistics

Los Angeles finished with 20 receptions for 220 yards and one receiving touchdown.

Player	Receptions	Yards	Average	TD	Long	Targets
Ladd McConkey	4	107	26.8	1	58	6
Quentin Johnston	5	42	8.4	0	15	10
Keenan Allen	2	19	9.5	0	12	5
Kimani Vidal	1	13	13.0	0	13	1
Oronde Gadsden	3	13	4.3	0	6	6
Tyler Conklin	1	12	12.0	0	12	1
Tucker Fisk	1	7	7.0	0	7	1
Tre’ Harris	2	4	2.0	0	5	2
Derius Davis	1	3	3.0	0	3	1
Team	20	220	11.0	1	58	33

The headline number is Ladd McConkey’s 107 receiving yards.

He was the only Chargers receiver to surpass 100 yards.

His four receptions averaged 26.8 yards each, and his longest catch covered 58 yards.

That 58-yard reception was especially important because it helped set up Vidal’s fourth-quarter touchdown.

Ladd McConkey’s 107-yard performance

McConkey was the biggest individual receiving producer in the game.

He caught four of six targets for 107 yards and one touchdown.

His touchdown came on a 15-yard pass from Herbert in the second quarter.

His 58-yard reception later became one of the game’s most important explosive plays.

The combination of volume and efficiency made his performance unusual. McConkey did not need a large number of receptions to reach 100 yards.

His 107 yards represented nearly half of Herbert’s gross passing yardage.

That makes him one of the clearest examples of how a single receiver can shape the statistical profile of an NFL game.

Quentin Johnston and the Chargers’ supporting receivers

Quentin Johnston led the Chargers in receptions with five.

He caught five of 10 targets for 42 yards.

His longest reception was 15 yards.

Keenan Allen added two receptions for 19 yards on five targets.

Oronde Gadsden recorded three receptions for 13 yards on six targets.

The Chargers therefore received contributions from several players rather than relying exclusively on McConkey.

However, McConkey was clearly responsible for the largest chunk of explosive receiving production.

Pittsburgh defensive statistics

Pittsburgh’s defense recorded:

• 82 total tackles
• 36 solo tackles
• 5 sacks
• 11 tackles for loss
• 5 passes defended
• 9 quarterback hits

Five sacks is a substantial defensive production number.

The Steelers also recorded nine quarterback hits, showing that their pass rush created pressure against Herbert.

However, the pressure did not lead to an interception.

Herbert finished with zero interceptions and maintained enough efficiency to guide Los Angeles to 25 points.

The Steelers’ defensive performance therefore contained several strong individual statistical elements without producing the turnovers needed to change the game’s direction.

Los Angeles defensive statistics

The Chargers recorded:

• 46 total tackles
• 30 solo tackles
• 3 sacks
• 4 tackles for loss
• 5 passes defended
• 5 quarterback hits
• 2 interceptions

The most important difference was the turnover production.

Los Angeles intercepted Rodgers twice.

Donte Jackson recorded one interception for 21 return yards.

RJ Mickens recorded another interception for 10 return yards.

Those two turnovers helped compensate for Pittsburgh’s ability to generate five sacks.

In a game where the Steelers struggled to convert third downs, giving the ball away twice made sustained offensive momentum even harder.

Turnovers and possession

Turnovers were one of the clearest statistical separators.

Pittsburgh recorded two fumbles and lost one.

Aaron Rodgers had one fumble that Pittsburgh recovered.

Ke’Shawn Williams also fumbled and lost possession.

Los Angeles recorded no fumbles and recovered one fumble.

The Chargers also intercepted Rodgers twice.

That gave Los Angeles a clear turnover advantage.

The possession figures reinforce the same story.

Team	Time of Possession
Pittsburgh Steelers	22:25
Los Angeles Chargers	37:35

Los Angeles held the ball for more than 15 additional minutes.

That extra possession time helped the Chargers run 69 offensive plays compared with Pittsburgh’s 50.

The official game statistics list Los Angeles with 314 total net yards and Pittsburgh with 221.

Third-down and fourth-down efficiency

Third-down performance provides another useful explanation.

Pittsburgh converted 2 of 11 third downs.

That equals an 18.2 percent conversion rate.

Los Angeles converted 6 of 17 third downs, or 35.3 percent.

Neither figure represents dominant third-down efficiency, but Los Angeles converted twice as many third downs.

The fourth-down results were also different.

Pittsburgh went 0 for 1.

Los Angeles converted its only fourth-down attempt.

These situations matter because they determine whether drives continue or end.

The Chargers were therefore more successful at extending possessions.

Total offense comparison

The overall team numbers were:

Statistic	Steelers	Chargers
First downs	11	18
Rushing first downs	4	11
Passing first downs	6	7
Third down	2/11	6/17
Fourth down	0/1	1/1
Total net yards	221	314
Offensive plays	50	69
Yards per play	4.4	4.6
Rushing yards	73	115
Rushing attempts	16	31
Net passing yards	148	199
Turnovers lost	3 listed possessions lost	0 interceptions or fumbles lost
Time of possession	22:25	37:35

The difference in offensive plays is especially important.

Los Angeles ran 69 plays.

Pittsburgh ran only 50.

That 19-play advantage created more opportunities for the Chargers to accumulate yards, convert downs, and score.

Special teams player statistics

Special teams also influenced the final result.

Pittsburgh kicking

Chris Boswell:

• Field goals: 1 of 2
• Field-goal percentage: 50 percent
• Long: 59 yards
• Extra points: 1 of 1
• Points: 4

Boswell’s 59-yard field goal gave Pittsburgh its early lead.

However, Pittsburgh missed its other field-goal opportunity.

Los Angeles kicking

Cameron Dicker:

• Field goals: 3 of 4
• Field-goal percentage: 75 percent
• Long: 59 yards
• Extra points: 2 of 2
• Points: 11

Dicker accounted for 11 points.

His three successful field goals provided valuable points while the Chargers’ offense was still establishing control.

Pittsburgh returns

Kenny Gainwell recorded two kickoff returns for 61 yards.

His average was 30.5 yards per return, with a long of 36.

Ke’Shawn Williams added one kickoff return for 23 yards.

Pittsburgh finished with 84 kickoff return yards on three returns.

Williams also recorded two punt returns for 11 yards.

Los Angeles returns

Trayveon Williams recorded two kickoff returns for 51 yards.

Derius Davis had one for 25 yards.

Los Angeles totaled 76 kickoff return yards.

Davis also returned one punt for five yards.

Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chargers match player stats: What the numbers reveal

The most useful way to understand this game is to connect the individual statistics with the team totals.

The Chargers did not win because Herbert threw for an enormous number of yards.

He threw for 220 yards.

Instead, Los Angeles combined several moderate advantages.

First, Herbert avoided interceptions.

Second, Vidal carried the ball 25 times.

Third, McConkey produced 107 receiving yards.

Fourth, the Chargers created two interceptions.

Finally, Los Angeles controlled possession for 37:35.

These factors worked together.

Pittsburgh, meanwhile, had some positive individual numbers.

Warren averaged 5.0 yards per carry.

The Steelers recorded five sacks.

Metcalf and Freiermuth each caught three passes.

Wilson produced a 27-yard touchdown.

Yet those individual contributions did not translate into enough sustained drives.

That distinction is essential when analyzing player statistics.

A box score can contain several strong individual performances on a team that still loses comfortably.

Why the rushing volume mattered

One of the clearest statistical differences was rushing volume.

Pittsburgh ran 16 times.

Los Angeles ran 31 times.

The Chargers therefore had 15 more rushing attempts.

Interestingly, Pittsburgh had the better rushing average.

The Steelers averaged 4.6 yards per carry.

The Chargers averaged 3.7.

But Los Angeles still gained 115 rushing yards compared with Pittsburgh’s 73.

The reason is volume.

This is an important point for anyone using player stats to analyze a game. A higher yards-per-carry figure does not necessarily mean a team had the more productive rushing offense.

Workload matters.

Game situation matters.

First downs matter.

And scoring opportunities matter.

Vidal’s 25 carries allowed the Chargers to keep the offense balanced while maintaining pressure on the Pittsburgh defense.

Why McConkey’s receiving numbers stand out

McConkey’s 107 receiving yards came on only four receptions.

That produces a remarkable 26.8 yards per catch.

His 58-yard reception was the game’s longest play listed in the receiving statistics.

His touchdown added another layer of value.

The Chargers therefore had an efficient vertical element even though their passing offense also relied on shorter completions.

This is different from a receiver accumulating 100 yards through 10 or 12 catches.

McConkey’s production came through explosive plays.

That helped Los Angeles gain substantial yardage without needing an extremely high number of completed passes.

Why Pittsburgh’s passing offense struggled

Rodgers completed 16 passes, but Pittsburgh’s offense generated only 148 net passing yards after sacks.

The Steelers also lost two interceptions.

Their third-down conversion rate was only 18.2 percent.

Those numbers created a difficult combination.

The offense struggled to stay on the field, while turnovers provided Los Angeles with additional opportunities.

Pittsburgh also did not score a touchdown until the fourth quarter.

That meant the Steelers spent most of the game attempting to overcome a growing deficit.

The importance of field position and scoring efficiency

The Chargers did not need to score touchdowns on every drive.

Dicker converted three field goals.

The Chargers also scored a safety.

Those smaller scoring plays helped build a lead before the offense produced the fourth-quarter touchdown that pushed the margin to 22-3.

This is another reason why a final-score analysis should include special teams and defensive scoring.

A team can win comfortably without dominating every offensive statistic.

Los Angeles accumulated points through multiple phases of the game.

Pittsburgh’s defensive pressure versus Los Angeles’ turnovers

There is an interesting contrast in the defensive statistics.

Pittsburgh recorded five sacks.

Los Angeles recorded three.

Pittsburgh also had nine quarterback hits compared with five for the Chargers.

Yet Los Angeles forced two interceptions.

This illustrates the difference between pressure and turnovers.

Pressure can disrupt an offense without necessarily creating a possession change.

Turnovers immediately end possessions and give the other team another opportunity to score.

In this game, Los Angeles converted that advantage into a 15-point victory.

What the final player statistics tell us

The most significant individual numbers were:

Justin Herbert

20 completions, 220 yards, one touchdown, zero interceptions.

Aaron Rodgers

16 completions, 161 yards, one touchdown, two interceptions.

Kimani Vidal

25 carries, 95 yards, one touchdown.

Jaylen Warren

14 carries, 70 yards, 5.0 yards per carry.

Ladd McConkey

4 receptions, 107 yards, one touchdown.

Roman Wilson

2 receptions, 35 yards, one touchdown.

Chris Boswell

One made field goal, including a 59-yard attempt.

Cameron Dicker

Three made field goals and two extra points for 11 total points.

These numbers give a much clearer picture than the final score alone.

A practical way to read this box score

If you are comparing these Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chargers match player stats with another NFL game, focus on five areas first.

1. Passing efficiency

Look beyond passing yards.

Completion percentage, yards per attempt, interceptions, and sacks provide a more complete picture.

2. Rushing workload

A running back’s yards per carry are useful, but carries matter too.

Vidal’s 25 carries were central to Los Angeles’ offensive control.

3. Explosive receiving plays

McConkey’s 58-yard reception significantly changed the field position and helped set up a touchdown.

4. Third-down performance

Pittsburgh’s 2-for-11 conversion rate made sustained drives difficult.

5. Turnover margin

Los Angeles intercepted Rodgers twice and did not lose a fumble.

That advantage helped protect the Chargers’ lead.

Final statistical summary

The Chargers finished with 314 total yards, 115 rushing yards, and 199 net passing yards.

The Steelers finished with 221 total yards, 73 rushing yards, and 148 net passing yards.

Los Angeles ran 69 offensive plays.

Pittsburgh ran 50.

The Chargers produced 18 first downs.

The Steelers produced 11.

Los Angeles controlled possession for 37:35.

Pittsburgh had the ball for 22:25.

The Chargers also recorded two interceptions and committed no lost fumbles.

Pittsburgh recorded one lost fumble and two interceptions thrown.

The final score of 25-10 was therefore supported by several connected statistical advantages rather than a single category.

FAQs

Who led the Steelers in rushing against the Chargers?

Jaylen Warren led Pittsburgh with 70 rushing yards on 14 carries. He averaged 5.0 yards per carry and had a longest run of 14 yards.

Who led the Chargers in rushing?

Kimani Vidal led Los Angeles with 95 rushing yards on 25 carries. He averaged 3.8 yards per carry and scored one touchdown.

Who was the leading receiver in the game?

Ladd McConkey led all receivers with 107 yards. He caught four passes on six targets and scored one touchdown.

How did Aaron Rodgers perform against the Chargers?

Rodgers completed 16 of 31 passes for 161 yards, one touchdown, and two interceptions. He was also sacked three times for 13 yards.

How did Justin Herbert perform?

Herbert completed 20 of 33 passes for 220 yards and one touchdown without an interception. He was sacked five times for 21 yards and also rushed for 19 yards.

What was the final score between the Steelers and Chargers?

The Los Angeles Chargers defeated the Pittsburgh Steelers 25-10 on November 9, 2025.

Conclusion

The Pittsburgh Steelers vs Chargers match player stats show a game shaped by possession, turnover control, rushing workload, and explosive receiving production.

Justin Herbert delivered 220 passing yards without an interception, while Aaron Rodgers finished with 161 yards and two interceptions.

Kimani Vidal supplied 95 rushing yards and a touchdown on 25 carries.

Ladd McConkey was the game’s most productive receiver, finishing with 107 yards and one touchdown.

For Pittsburgh, Jaylen Warren produced 70 rushing yards on 14 carries, while Roman Wilson supplied the team’s only touchdown through a 27-yard reception.

The Chargers also ran 19 more offensive plays than Pittsburgh and held the ball for more than 15 additional minutes.

The Steelers generated five sacks and nine quarterback hits, but Los Angeles created the more favorable turnover profile.

Taken together, the statistics explain why the Chargers finished with a 25-10 victory despite Pittsburgh producing some strong individual defensive and rushing numbers.