Sacramento Kings vs Timberwolves Match Player Stats

The sacramento kings vs timberwolves match player stats from the November 9, 2025 meeting tell a much deeper story than the final 144-117 score. Minnesota did not simply win because Anthony Edwards scored 26 points. The Timberwolves controlled the game through efficient shooting, interior scoring, defensive disruption, ball movement, and contributions from several players at once. Sacramento had three major scorers reach at least 20 points, yet still lost by 27 because its offense could not match Minnesota’s efficiency or prevent the Timberwolves from repeatedly attacking the paint.

This game was played at Golden 1 Center in Sacramento, with an attendance of 15,227. Minnesota entered the matchup at 5-4 and improved to 6-4 after the victory, while Sacramento dropped to 3-7. The Timberwolves scored 31, 40, 40 and 33 points across the four quarters, while Sacramento produced 25, 29, 30 and 33. The final quarter was even at 33-33, but Minnesota had already created a decisive advantage during the first three periods.

Sacramento Kings vs Timberwolves Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The clearest way to understand this matchup is to look beyond the leading scorers. Minnesota shot 52-of-97 from the field, good for 54 percent, while Sacramento made 40 of 90 attempts, or 44 percent. The Timberwolves also made 18 of 46 three-point attempts, compared with Sacramento’s 13 of 29.

Interestingly, Sacramento had the better three-point percentage at 45 percent compared with Minnesota’s 39 percent. That statistic shows why looking at one category alone can be misleading. Minnesota took 46 three-point attempts, but its major advantage came from overall shot-making and its ability to score inside.

Minnesota finished with 64 points in the paint, compared with 46 for Sacramento. The Timberwolves also scored 32 fast-break points to Sacramento’s 20 and generated 51 bench points compared with 34 for the Kings.

The overall team numbers were:

Category	Timberwolves	Kings
Final Score	144	117
Field Goals	52-97	40-90
Field Goal %	54%	44%
Three-Pointers	18-46	13-29
Three-Point %	39%	45%
Free Throws	22-24	24-31
Free Throw %	92%	77%
Rebounds	44	43
Assists	28	25
Turnovers	10	16
Steals	11	8
Blocks	9	3
Points in Paint	64	46
Fast-Break Points	32	20
Bench Points	51	34

These numbers reveal the main difference. Sacramento was not completely overwhelmed on the glass and actually shot a higher percentage from three. The biggest problems were field-goal efficiency, turnovers, interior defense and Minnesota’s ability to convert those advantages into points.

Anthony Edwards Leads Minnesota With 26 Points

Anthony Edwards was Minnesota’s leading scorer with 26 points. He shot 7-of-16 from the field, 5-of-11 from three and 7-of-8 from the free-throw line. He also recorded 4 rebounds, 5 assists and 2 steals.

His plus-minus of +25 is particularly useful when evaluating his overall impact. Minnesota was not merely winning when Edwards scored. The team was also controlling his minutes by a substantial margin.

Edwards had a slow beginning, missing his first five shots. That did not prevent him from becoming one of the game’s most important offensive players. According to the official game recap, he scored 16 points in the second quarter and helped Minnesota establish a 71-54 halftime lead.

That sequence illustrates something important about Edwards’ value. His impact was not dependent on making every early attempt. Once he found his rhythm, Sacramento had difficulty keeping him away from efficient scoring opportunities.

His five made three-pointers also stretched Sacramento’s defense. When a primary scorer can create pressure from outside while still attacking the basket, defensive schemes become harder to maintain.

Jaden McDaniels Provides Efficient Scoring

Jaden McDaniels delivered one of the most efficient performances of the game.

He scored 21 points on 8-of-10 shooting, including 2-of-3 from three-point range. He also made all three of his free throws, grabbed 5 rebounds, recorded 3 assists and blocked 2 shots.

The 80 percent field-goal shooting stands out immediately. Unlike a high-volume scoring performance that depends on many attempts, McDaniels produced 21 points while taking only 10 field-goal attempts.

His +15 plus-minus also reflected Minnesota’s strong overall control during his minutes.

For analysts studying sacramento kings vs timberwolves match player stats, McDaniels is an important example of why the box score should not be reduced to the highest scoring player. Edwards led Minnesota in scoring, but McDaniels’ efficiency helped make the offense difficult to defend.

Rudy Gobert Controls the Interior

Rudy Gobert finished with 19 points, 12 rebounds and 5 blocks.

He shot 9-of-10 from the field and converted 1-of-2 free throws. His 12 rebounds included 11 defensive boards, and his +21 plus-minus was one of Minnesota’s strongest marks.

The five blocks were especially significant because Sacramento had to deal with a large defensive presence around the rim throughout the game.

Gobert’s offensive efficiency also mattered. Nine made field goals from 10 attempts meant Sacramento could not simply focus on stopping Minnesota’s perimeter players. When the Kings shifted defensive attention toward Edwards and Minnesota’s shooters, Gobert could punish them around the basket.

This is one of the clearest explanations for Minnesota’s 64-46 advantage in points in the paint.

Julius Randle Adds Another 19-Point Performance

Julius Randle scored 19 points on 8-of-16 shooting. He added 6 rebounds, 4 assists and 1 steal while committing only 1 turnover.

His 4 assists are worth noting because Randle was not simply functioning as a scorer. His ability to contribute as a passer gave Minnesota another way to create offense when Sacramento concentrated on its primary scorers.

Randle also posted a +19 plus-minus.

When four Timberwolves players score at least 19 points, it becomes much harder for an opponent to solve the offense through a single defensive matchup.

Minnesota’s Supporting Cast Made a Major Difference

The Timberwolves received useful contributions throughout their rotation.

Naz Reid scored 13 points and made 3-of-9 three-point attempts. He also recorded 4 rebounds, 2 assists, 2 steals and 1 block.

Johnny Juzang was particularly efficient off the bench. He scored 11 points on 3-of-4 shooting from the field, made all three of his three-point attempts and converted both free throws.

Mike Conley scored 6 points while shooting 2-of-3 from the field and 2-of-3 from three. He also recorded 3 rebounds, 3 assists and 1 steal.

Donte DiVincenzo scored 8 points and added 4 rebounds, 4 assists, 2 steals and 1 block.

Bones Hyland scored 4 points, while the Minnesota bench and supporting rotation helped the team maintain its offensive pressure.

The overall bench advantage was 51-34 in Minnesota’s favor. That is an important part of the result because Sacramento’s starters produced respectable scoring numbers, but Minnesota received more support beyond its primary names.

Zach LaVine Leads Sacramento With 26 Points

Zach LaVine was Sacramento’s leading scorer with 26 points.

He shot an excellent 10-of-17 from the field and 6-of-9 from three-point range. He also grabbed 4 rebounds, recorded 2 assists and had 1 steal.

From a pure individual scoring perspective, LaVine had an efficient game. His 26 points matched Edwards’ total, and his six made three-pointers were the most by any Sacramento player.

Yet his +/− was -21.

That contrast is important. Individual scoring efficiency can coexist with a team-level defensive problem. LaVine’s offense was productive, but Sacramento still struggled to contain Minnesota’s overall attack.

This is why serious game analysis should distinguish between individual production and overall lineup performance.

DeMar DeRozan Scores 22 Points

DeMar DeRozan finished with 22 points on 7-of-11 shooting.

He was also perfect from outside the arc, making all three of his three-point attempts, and went 5-of-5 at the free-throw line. He added 3 rebounds, 2 assists and 1 steal.

Like LaVine, DeRozan was efficient individually.

However, his plus-minus was -19, another sign that Sacramento’s overall performance was the bigger issue.

The Kings had three players score at least 20 points, but the team still scored only 117. That means the production was concentrated among a relatively small group rather than spread across the full rotation.

Domantas Sabonis Records 20 Points and 13 Rebounds

Domantas Sabonis recorded 20 points and 13 rebounds.

He shot 5-of-17 from the field, made 10-of-12 free throws and added 3 assists and 1 steal.

His 13 rebounds were a team-high for Sacramento, and his five offensive rebounds helped the Kings create additional possessions.

However, the shooting efficiency was a major concern. Sabonis needed 17 field-goal attempts to make five baskets.

That does not mean his performance was poor in every area. His rebounding and ability to draw free throws were valuable. But against a Minnesota team shooting 54 percent, Sacramento needed more efficient scoring from its interior focal point.

Sabonis finished with a -19 plus-minus.

Precious Achiuwa Provides Energy

Precious Achiuwa contributed 12 points and 10 rebounds.

He shot 5-of-7 from the field and added a block. His 10 rebounds gave Sacramento another strong presence on the glass.

His performance is easy to overlook because LaVine, DeRozan and Sabonis occupied most of the scoring attention. But Achiuwa’s double-double showed that Sacramento did have productive individual performances beyond its three leading scorers.

The problem was that those contributions did not collectively translate into enough defensive resistance.

Nique Clifford Shows Promise From the Bench

Nique Clifford scored 10 points on 4-of-7 shooting.

He also recorded 5 rebounds and 5 assists, giving Sacramento a useful all-around contribution. His three turnovers were a negative, but the combination of scoring, rebounding and passing made his stat line one of the more versatile performances among the Kings’ reserves.

Keon Ellis added 5 points, 3 rebounds and 2 assists.

Russell Westbrook scored 6 points and added 1 assist, 2 turnovers, 1 steal and 1 block.

Malik Monk scored 2 points but recorded 5 assists.

These numbers demonstrate why the final score cannot be explained simply by Sacramento’s top three scorers.

Sacramento’s Biggest Problem Was Not Three-Point Shooting

One of the most interesting elements of the sacramento kings vs timberwolves match player stats is that Sacramento actually shot better from three.

The Kings made 45 percent of their three-point attempts.

Minnesota made 39 percent.

If someone looked only at three-point percentage, Sacramento would appear to have the advantage.

But basketball games are not decided by three-point percentage alone.

Minnesota made 52 field goals compared with Sacramento’s 40. The Timberwolves also generated 64 points in the paint, 32 fast-break points and 51 bench points.

The Kings had 16 turnovers compared with Minnesota’s 10. That six-turnover difference gave the Timberwolves more opportunities to attack before Sacramento could establish its defense.

This is a useful lesson when reading box scores: a team can win an individual statistical category while losing the larger possession battle.

Minnesota Won the Efficiency Battle

Minnesota’s 54 percent shooting was perhaps the most important basic statistic.

The Timberwolves attempted seven more field goals than Sacramento and made 12 more.

That means the shooting percentage difference produced a substantial number of additional made baskets.

Minnesota also shot 92 percent from the free-throw line, converting 22 of 24 attempts.

Sacramento got to the line more often and attempted 31 free throws, but made only 24.

So Minnesota had the advantage in both field-goal efficiency and free-throw efficiency.

That combination is extremely difficult to overcome.

Turnovers Created Extra Opportunities

Minnesota committed only 10 turnovers.

Sacramento committed 16.

That six-turnover gap may look modest in isolation, but it becomes more meaningful when combined with Minnesota’s transition scoring.

The Timberwolves scored 32 fast-break points, while Sacramento scored 20.

Minnesota also recorded 11 steals.

The Kings’ 16 turnovers therefore had a direct relationship with the type of game Minnesota wanted to play. Every live-ball mistake created opportunities for the Timberwolves to attack a defense that was not fully organized.

The Paint Was the Deciding Battlefield

The 64-46 advantage in points in the paint is one of the strongest clues in the entire box score.

Minnesota’s interior production came from several sources.

Gobert shot 9-of-10.

McDaniels shot 8-of-10.

Randle shot 8-of-16.

Those numbers show that Minnesota was not relying on one big man or one guard to generate offense.

The Timberwolves had multiple players capable of converting efficiently near the basket.

Sacramento’s defense therefore faced a difficult choice. Overcommit to Edwards and perimeter shooters, and Minnesota could attack inside. Collapse toward the paint, and the Timberwolves could create outside opportunities.

Why the Game Was Essentially Decided Before the Fourth Quarter

The fourth quarter ended 33-33.

That statistic might initially make the final score seem surprising.

But the game had already been decided.

Minnesota led 31-25 after the first quarter, then exploded for 40 points in the second. The Timberwolves added another 40 in the third.

At halftime, Minnesota led 71-54.

After three quarters, the advantage had become even larger.

The official game recap reported that Minnesota reached its largest lead at 99-71 in the third quarter.

This is an important distinction between a close fourth quarter and a competitive game. Sacramento matched Minnesota during the final period, but it was trying to recover from a deficit that had already become too large.

Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

First Quarter

Minnesota led 31-25.

The six-point advantage was meaningful but not decisive.

Sacramento remained within striking distance, and the game was still competitive.

Second Quarter

Minnesota scored 40 points while Sacramento scored 29.

This was the first major separation point.

Edwards became particularly influential during this period, scoring 16 points in the second quarter according to the official recap.

Minnesota went into halftime ahead 71-54.

Third Quarter

The Timberwolves again scored 40 points.

Sacramento managed 30, but that was not enough to stop Minnesota’s momentum.

The Timberwolves extended their advantage to 31 points at one stage.

Fourth Quarter

Both teams scored 33.

Sacramento avoided losing the final period, but the game was already effectively decided.

This is why the full game should be viewed as a 27-point Minnesota victory rather than simply a dominant fourth-quarter performance.

A Closer Look at Plus-Minus

Plus-minus can be misunderstood, but in this particular game it provides useful context.

Minnesota’s major contributors posted strong numbers:

• Anthony Edwards: +25
• Rudy Gobert: +21
• Julius Randle: +19
• Mike Conley: +17
• Jaden McDaniels: +15
• Donte DiVincenzo: +15

Sacramento’s main starters were mostly negative:

• Zach LaVine: -21
• DeMar DeRozan: -19
• Domantas Sabonis: -19
• Dennis Schroder: -15
• Precious Achiuwa: -10

The numbers reinforce the broader story. Minnesota’s best players were collectively winning their minutes, while Sacramento’s leading scorers were unable to overcome the team’s defensive problems.

Plus-minus should never be treated as a standalone measure of individual quality, but in a 27-point game it can help illustrate how the game developed across lineups.

What the Player Stats Say About Minnesota’s Offense

The Timberwolves’ offensive performance was unusually balanced.

Four players scored at least 19 points.

Edwards led the way with 26, but McDaniels scored 21 while Randle and Gobert each added 19.

That means Sacramento could not simply remove one scorer from the game and expect Minnesota’s offense to collapse.

The team’s 28 assists also demonstrate that the scoring was not entirely isolation-based.

Minnesota moved the ball effectively enough to create efficient attempts across multiple players.

The official NBA game data confirms the team’s 28 assists, 44 rebounds, 10 turnovers and 9 blocks.

What the Player Stats Say About Sacramento’s Offense

Sacramento had three players at or above 20 points.

LaVine scored 26.

DeRozan scored 22.

Sabonis scored 20.

That sounds productive, and individually it was.

But the Kings still scored 27 fewer points than Minnesota.

The issue was not an inability to find individual scorers. It was the inability to maintain the same overall efficiency and defensive consistency.

Sacramento’s 16 turnovers also limited its offensive opportunities.

The Kings produced 25 assists, which was only three fewer than Minnesota, so the passing numbers were not dramatically different.

The larger distinction was what happened after those possessions developed.

Minnesota converted its opportunities more efficiently.

The Most Important Statistical Takeaways

The key numbers from this matchup can be summarized as follows:

1. Minnesota shot 54 percent from the field.
2. Sacramento shot 44 percent.
3. Minnesota scored 64 points in the paint.
4. Minnesota scored 32 fast-break points.
5. Minnesota’s bench produced 51 points.
6. Sacramento committed 16 turnovers.
7. Minnesota committed only 10 turnovers.
8. Gobert recorded 12 rebounds and 5 blocks.
9. Edwards scored 26 points and made five threes.
10. LaVine scored 26 points and made six threes.

The most revealing point is that the two leading scorers both finished with 26 points, yet their teams had completely different results.

That is why player statistics need to be evaluated within the team context.

How to Read This Box Score More Intelligently

If you are using sacramento kings vs timberwolves match player stats to evaluate player performance, start with scoring but do not stop there.

A better process is:

Step 1: Identify the leading scorers

This tells you who carried the scoring burden.

Step 2: Check shooting efficiency

Compare field goals made and attempted, not just total points.

Step 3: Look at rebounds and assists

These reveal contributions that scoring totals can miss.

Step 4: Review turnovers

Turnovers can create additional possessions for the opponent.

Step 5: Examine plus-minus carefully

It can provide context about how the team performed during a player’s minutes.

Step 6: Compare team-level statistics

Look at field-goal percentage, points in the paint, transition points, turnovers and bench scoring.

This approach gives a much more complete picture than simply asking who scored the most.

Real-World Fantasy Basketball and Performance Analysis

These numbers are also useful for fantasy basketball analysis.

A fantasy player might see Edwards’ 26 points and focus exclusively on scoring. But his 5 assists, 4 rebounds and 2 steals add significant value.

Gobert’s 19 points might initially appear less impressive than Edwards’ total, yet his 12 rebounds and 5 blocks provide a completely different type of production.

McDaniels’ 21 points on 8-of-10 shooting demonstrate the value of efficiency.

Sabonis’ 20 points and 13 rebounds show how a player can generate strong counting statistics despite shooting only 5-of-17 from the field.

For fantasy analysis, the lesson is simple: scoring is only one part of the player profile.

Season Series Context

This November meeting was the first game of the season series, and Minnesota won 144-117.

The later meetings produced very different results.

The Kings won 124-110 on November 15, 2025.

Sacramento then won again, defeating Minnesota 117-112 in overtime on November 25.

Minnesota responded with a 117-103 victory on December 15.

That made the four-game season series 2-2.

The schedule records confirm the later results, including Minnesota’s 124-110 loss to Sacramento on November 14 in the schedule listing and the subsequent overtime result in Sacramento.

The broader season-series picture is useful because it prevents this 144-117 result from being treated as a complete description of the matchup between the teams.

Why the November 9 Performance Still Matters

Even though the season series later became much more competitive, the first meeting provides a useful snapshot of Minnesota’s strengths.

The Timberwolves demonstrated:

• Efficient interior scoring
• Multiple reliable scorers
• Strong transition offense
• Low turnover volume
• Rim protection
• Bench production
• High free-throw efficiency
• Strong ball movement

Sacramento demonstrated:

• High-level individual scoring from LaVine
• Efficient three-point shooting
• Strong rebounding from Sabonis
• Useful bench contributions
• The ability to score efficiently in certain stretches

But the Kings could not combine those strengths into enough two-way consistency to stay competitive.

Official Data and Source Verification

For readers who want to verify the numbers, the official NBA box score is the best primary reference for the game’s player-by-player statistics. Official NBA Box Score

The official record lists Minnesota at 144 points and Sacramento at 117, with the game played at Golden 1 Center. It also confirms the individual statistics for Edwards, McDaniels, Randle, Gobert, LaVine, DeRozan, Sabonis and the rest of both rotations.

Using the primary box score is particularly important when publishing sports statistics because small errors in field-goal attempts, three-point attempts, rebounds or plus-minus figures can make an otherwise useful article unreliable.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who was the leading scorer in the Timberwolves vs Kings game?

Anthony Edwards and Zach LaVine both scored 26 points. Edwards led Minnesota, while LaVine led Sacramento.

What was the final score between the Timberwolves and Kings?

Minnesota defeated Sacramento 144-117.

How many points did Anthony Edwards score?

Anthony Edwards scored 26 points on 7-of-16 shooting, including 5-of-11 from three-point range. He also recorded 4 rebounds, 5 assists and 2 steals.

How many points did Zach LaVine score?

Zach LaVine scored 26 points on 10-of-17 shooting and made 6 of his 9 three-point attempts.

Did Domantas Sabonis record a double-double?

Yes. Sabonis finished with 20 points and 13 rebounds.

Which team shot better from the field?

Minnesota shot better overall. The Timberwolves made 54 percent of their field-goal attempts, compared with 44 percent for Sacramento. Sacramento did shoot a higher three-point percentage, 45 percent compared with Minnesota’s 39 percent.

Conclusion

The sacramento kings vs timberwolves match player stats from this matchup show why a box score needs to be read as a complete statistical story rather than a list of scoring totals.

Anthony Edwards led Minnesota with 26 points, while Jaden McDaniels added 21 and Julius Randle and Rudy Gobert each scored 19. Gobert’s 12 rebounds and 5 blocks were particularly important, while McDaniels delivered exceptional efficiency by shooting 8-of-10 from the field.

Sacramento received 26 points from Zach LaVine, 22 from DeMar DeRozan and 20 from Domantas Sabonis. Sabonis also collected 13 rebounds, while Precious Achiuwa added 12 points and 10 rebounds.

The deciding factors were largely team-based. Minnesota shot 54 percent from the field, scored 64 points in the paint, produced 32 fast-break points and committed only 10 turnovers. Sacramento shot 44 percent overall, turned the ball over 16 times and allowed Minnesota to generate sustained pressure across the first three quarters.

The final 33-33 fourth quarter is also an important reminder that the game was decided earlier. Minnesota’s 40-point second and third quarters created a lead that Sacramento could not erase.

Ultimately, the numbers show a Minnesota team that combined star scoring with efficient secondary production, interior dominance, transition offense and defensive disruption. Sacramento had several strong individual performances, but those performances were not enough to overcome Minnesota’s greater efficiency and balance.