Orlando Magic vs Washington Wizards Match Player Stats
The orlando magic vs washington wizards match player stats from March 13, 2026, show a high-scoring overtime battle that Orlando ultimately won 136-131 at Kia Center. The Magic finished the night with a 13-8 edge in overtime, turning a close game into their third victory over Washington in the four-game season series.
The box score tells a more interesting story than the final score alone. Washington actually produced 48 field goals compared with Orlando’s 47 and finished with a strong 88% free-throw rate. Orlando, however, created separation through three-point accuracy, ball movement, extra possessions on the glass, and a more disruptive defensive performance. The Magic shot 15-of-34 from three-point range, compared with Washington’s 14-of-46, while also recording 30 assists and 12 steals.
For individual performances, Bilal Coulibaly led all scorers with 29 points for Washington, while Jalen Suggs delivered Orlando’s most complete performance with 28 points, 4 rebounds, 8 assists, and 2 steals. Tristan da Silva added 26 points for the Magic, and Wendell Carter Jr. controlled the rebounding battle with 11 boards.
Game Overview
The March 13 matchup was played at Kia Center in Orlando, Florida, with an attendance of 17,321. Orlando entered the contest at 37-28 overall and 22-12 at home, while Washington came in at 16-49 and 5-27 on the road.
The final score was:
Orlando Magic 136, Washington Wizards 131
The result required overtime after the teams remained separated by only a narrow margin through regulation. Washington scored 8 points in the extra period, but Orlando produced 13 to secure the five-point victory.
That overtime margin is important because it highlights the difference between simply surviving a close game and finishing it. Orlando generated the better late-game offensive output when every possession carried greater weight.
Match Snapshot
| Category | Washington Wizards | Orlando Magic |
| Final Score | 131 | 136 |
| Field Goals | 48-105 | 47-100 |
| Field Goal % | 46% | 47% |
| Three-Pointers | 14-46 | 15-34 |
| Three-Point % | 30% | 44% |
| Free Throws | 21-24 | 27-34 |
| Free Throw % | 88% | 79% |
| Rebounds | 49 | 52 |
| Assists | 26 | 30 |
| Turnovers | 15 | 13 |
| Steals | 7 | 12 |
| Blocks | 10 | 5 |
The numbers reveal why this was not simply a matter of one team shooting better overall. Washington’s 46% field-goal percentage was respectable, and its 88% free-throw shooting was excellent. Orlando’s advantage came from combining slightly better overall shooting with a much stronger three-point percentage, more assists, more rebounds, fewer turnovers, and five additional steals.
Orlando Magic vs Washington Wizards Match Player Stats
The orlando magic vs washington wizards match player stats are especially useful when separated into scoring, rebounding, playmaking, and defensive production.
Orlando’s Leading Performers
Jalen Suggs
Jalen Suggs was Orlando’s most complete player in the game.
He finished with:
- 28 points
- 4 rebounds
- 8 assists
- 2 steals
His eight assists were the highest total on either team, and his two steals added another layer to his overall impact.
What stands out most is the balance of his production. Suggs was not simply a scorer who happened to distribute the ball. He influenced multiple parts of the game, helping Orlando create shots while also contributing defensively.
His performance is a good example of why a traditional points leaderboard does not always identify the most influential player. Coulibaly scored one more point than Suggs, but Suggs contributed eight assists and two steals while helping Orlando maintain offensive structure.
Tristan da Silva
Tristan da Silva produced 26 points, making him Orlando’s second-highest scorer.
His scoring was particularly important because Orlando did not rely on one player to carry the offense. Having Suggs at 28 and da Silva at 26 gave the Magic two major scoring contributors while allowing other players to remain involved in rebounding and playmaking responsibilities.
A two-player scoring combination totaling 54 points gave Orlando the offensive foundation needed to reach 136 points.
Wendell Carter Jr.
Wendell Carter Jr. led Orlando in rebounding with 11 boards.
His rebounding contribution helped Orlando finish with a 52-49 team advantage on the glass. That three-rebound margin might appear modest, but in an overtime game decided by five points, small possession advantages can become meaningful.
Carter’s work was particularly important because offensive rebounds and defensive rebounds can influence the number of opportunities a team receives throughout a game.
Washington’s Leading Performers
Bilal Coulibaly
Bilal Coulibaly was Washington’s leading scorer with 29 points.
He also recorded:
- 5 rebounds
- 5 assists
- 5-of-11 from three-point range
The five made three-pointers were particularly significant. Coulibaly provided Washington with a reliable perimeter scoring threat and finished with a balanced statistical line rather than contributing only as a scorer.
His 29 points were the highest individual scoring total in the game, which makes the final result even more interesting. Washington had the game’s leading scorer but still lost.
That is a useful reminder that individual scoring output and team success are not always directly connected.
Trae Young
Trae Young finished with 15 points, 6 assists, and contributed to Washington’s offensive creation.
His six assists tied Jamir Watkins for Washington’s team-high in that category. While his scoring total was considerably lower than Coulibaly’s, his playmaking helped Washington generate offense throughout the game.
The contrast between Young’s 15 points and Coulibaly’s 29 shows how Washington’s scoring responsibilities were distributed differently from Orlando’s.
Justin Champagnie
Justin Champagnie led Washington in rebounding with 11 boards.
That matched Carter’s team-leading total for Orlando and helped Washington finish with 49 rebounds overall.
Champagnie’s rebounding was one of the reasons Washington remained competitive on the possession battle despite eventually losing the game.
What the Team Numbers Reveal
Looking beyond individual performances provides a clearer explanation of the result.
Three-Point Shooting Was a Major Separator
The biggest statistical difference was outside shooting.
Washington:
14-of-46 from three, 30%
Orlando:
15-of-34 from three, 44%
Orlando attempted 12 fewer three-pointers but made one more.
That is a major efficiency difference.
Washington’s strategy produced volume, but Orlando generated considerably better results per attempt. In a game that went to overtime, those accumulated points mattered.
This is one of the clearest lessons from the orlando magic vs washington wizards match player stats. A team does not necessarily benefit from taking more three-pointers if its efficiency falls sharply.
Orlando Won the Rebounding Battle
Orlando grabbed 52 rebounds compared with Washington’s 49.
The three-rebound advantage was not overwhelming, but it gave Orlando an edge in controlling possessions.
Wendell Carter Jr. and Washington’s Justin Champagnie both finished with 11 rebounds, making the individual rebounding battle essentially even at the top.
The difference came from the combined contributions of the rest of the rosters.
Ball Movement Favored Orlando
Orlando recorded 30 assists, while Washington finished with 26.
That four-assist advantage reflects a broader difference in offensive organization.
Jalen Suggs was central to Orlando’s playmaking with eight assists. Washington had six assists each from Trae Young and Jamir Watkins.
Orlando’s advantage was not enormous, but it complemented the Magic’s superior three-point efficiency. Better ball movement can create cleaner perimeter opportunities, and Orlando’s 44% three-point shooting suggests that the team converted those opportunities effectively.
Turnovers Also Favored Orlando
Washington committed 15 turnovers.
Orlando committed 13.
That two-turnover difference becomes more relevant when combined with Orlando’s 12 steals.
The Magic were able to create defensive disruption without giving away as many possessions themselves.
Defensive Production Tells Another Story
Washington blocked 10 shots, compared with five for Orlando.
At first glance, that looks like a clear defensive advantage for the Wizards. But blocks are only one component of defense.
Orlando recorded 12 steals compared with Washington’s seven. The Magic also committed fewer turnovers.
This produces an interesting statistical contrast:
- Washington had more blocks.
- Orlando had more steals.
- Orlando had fewer turnovers.
- Orlando scored more points.
- Orlando shot much better from three.
The lesson is that defensive impact cannot be reduced to one box-score category.
A team can produce more blocked shots while another team creates more disruption through steals and forced mistakes.
Why Orlando Won Despite Washington’s 48 Field Goals
One of the most interesting details in the box score is that Washington made 48 field goals, while Orlando made 47.
Yet Orlando scored five more points in regulation and overtime combined.
How?
The answer begins with three-point efficiency and free throws.
Washington made 48 two-point or three-point field goals but shot only 30% from three. Orlando made 47 field goals but converted 44% of its three-point attempts.
Orlando also made 27 free throws compared with Washington’s 21.
This is an excellent example of why simply counting made field goals does not tell the whole story.
Scoring value depends on the type of shot.
A made three-pointer is worth more than a made two-pointer, and free throws can add points without requiring a field goal.
Overtime Was the Decisive Stretch
The game entered overtime with both teams still within striking distance.
Washington scored eight points during overtime.
Orlando scored 13.
That five-point overtime difference exactly matched the final margin.
This means the entire final score can be understood through a simple late-game observation: the teams were competitive for the majority of the contest, but Orlando executed better during the extra five-minute period.
For analysts, overtime games require special caution. A five-point final margin can make a game appear relatively comfortable when the reality is that one or two possessions in the extra period determined the outcome.
Season Series: Orlando Won 3-1
The March 13 game was the fourth meeting between the teams during the season.
Orlando finished the season series with a 3-1 advantage.
Game 1
November 2
Orlando Magic 125, Washington Wizards 94
Orlando won by 31 points.
Game 2
January 7
Washington Wizards 120, Orlando Magic 112
Washington secured its only victory of the season series.
Game 3
March 4
Orlando Magic 126, Washington Wizards 109
Orlando won by 17 points.
Game 4
March 13
Orlando Magic 136, Washington Wizards 131
Orlando won in overtime.
The series therefore showed a clear overall trend. Washington was capable of beating Orlando, but the Magic won the other three meetings, including two games by double-digit margins and one overtime thriller.
Comparing the Four Matchups
The four-game series is more informative than examining one box score in isolation.
Orlando scored:
- 125 points in Game 1
- 112 points in Game 2
- 126 points in Game 3
- 136 points in Game 4
Washington scored:
- 94 points in Game 1
- 120 points in Game 2
- 109 points in Game 3
- 131 points in Game 4
The scoring pattern shows that the March 13 matchup was easily the highest-scoring meeting of the season.
It also suggests that the final game was considerably more competitive than the first and third meetings.
What the Records Say About the Context
Washington entered the game with a 16-49 record and a 5-27 road record.
Orlando entered at 37-28 and 22-12 at home.
Those records establish a significant contextual difference.
Orlando had demonstrated strong home performance, while Washington had struggled significantly away from home.
The venue therefore mattered.
The game was played at Kia Center, where Orlando entered with a 22-12 home record. Washington was trying to overcome a 5-27 road mark.
The final result followed that broader trend, although Washington came much closer than the records might have suggested.
The Most Important Statistical Takeaways
Several conclusions stand out from this matchup.
1. Three-Point Efficiency Beat Three-Point Volume
Washington attempted 46 threes.
Orlando attempted 34.
Yet Orlando made one more three-pointer.
That is a powerful efficiency lesson. Volume can increase scoring opportunities, but accuracy determines how effectively those opportunities are converted.
2. Suggs Provided the More Complete Individual Performance
Coulibaly led the game with 29 points.
Suggs finished with 28.
But Suggs also produced eight assists and two steals.
That made his overall statistical contribution more diverse.
3. Orlando Had Better Ball Security
The Magic committed 13 turnovers.
The Wizards committed 15.
The difference was only two possessions, but Orlando also produced 12 steals.
That combination helped the Magic win the possession and efficiency battle.
4. Washington’s Free-Throw Shooting Was Excellent
Washington made 21 of 24 free throws for 88%.
Orlando made 27 of 34 for 79%.
So although Orlando won the game, Washington was actually more efficient from the free-throw line.
This is another reason not to evaluate the contest through a single percentage.
5. The Game Was Decided at the Margins
The final five-point difference came entirely from overtime.
Orlando’s 13-8 advantage in the extra period made the difference.
That makes late-game execution one of the strongest themes of the matchup.
A Practical Way to Read NBA Player Stats
For readers trying to understand games like this beyond the headline score, a useful approach is to evaluate five categories.
Scoring
Start with points, but then examine how those points were generated.
A 29-point performance built around efficient three-point shooting is different from 29 points produced through a large number of attempts.
Shooting Efficiency
Compare field-goal percentage, three-point percentage, and free-throw percentage.
This helps distinguish scoring volume from scoring efficiency.
Possession Control
Look at rebounds and turnovers.
A team that rebounds well and protects the ball usually creates more opportunities.
Playmaking
Assists show how much an offense relies on shared creation.
In this game, Orlando’s 30 assists and Suggs’ eight assists were important indicators.
Defensive Events
Steals and blocks provide useful information, but they should not be viewed independently.
Washington’s 10 blocks did not translate into a victory, while Orlando’s 12 steals contributed to a more disruptive defensive performance.
Why the Matchup Matters for Future Analysis
The March 13 game offers a useful case study for evaluating close NBA games.
The final margin was only five points, but the teams had different strengths.
Washington demonstrated:
- Strong free-throw accuracy
- High three-point volume
- 10 blocked shots
- 49 rebounds
- A 29-point performance from Coulibaly
Orlando demonstrated:
- Superior three-point efficiency
- More assists
- More rebounds
- Fewer turnovers
- More steals
- A 28-point, 8-assist performance from Suggs
- A 26-point performance from da Silva
That combination explains why Orlando ultimately prevailed.
Data Quality and How to Use These Numbers
When researching orlando magic vs washington wizards match player stats, it is important to distinguish between confirmed game statistics and interpretation.
The core figures used here come from the game data supplied for the March 13, 2026 matchup. Interpretive statements, such as the importance of three-point efficiency or overtime execution, are based directly on those statistical relationships rather than invented player narratives.
For readers building their own statistical analysis, the most useful practice is to compare several categories at once instead of relying on points alone.
For example, Coulibaly’s 29 points make him the game’s leading scorer, but Suggs’ 28 points, eight assists, and two steals provide a broader measure of his influence.
Likewise, Washington’s 10 blocks look impressive, but Orlando’s 12 steals and lower turnover total point toward a different type of defensive impact.
Suggested Internal Links
For a basketball statistics website, this article can naturally connect to related pages such as:
- Orlando Magic player stats and season analysis
- Washington Wizards player stats and game-by-game results
- NBA overtime game analysis
- Orlando Magic vs Washington Wizards previous matchup
- NBA team shooting percentage guide
These links should be placed only where they genuinely help readers continue their research.
Recommended Schema Markup
For this article, use Article schema to identify the page as an informational sports article.
You can also use FAQPage schema for the FAQ section below if the implementation meets Google’s current structured-data requirements.
A reliable implementation should reflect the actual visible content on the page. Avoid adding structured data for information that is not present in the article.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points in the Orlando Magic vs Washington Wizards game?
Bilal Coulibaly led all scorers with 29 points for Washington. Jalen Suggs led Orlando with 28 points.
Who was Orlando’s best player in the game?
Jalen Suggs produced Orlando’s most complete statistical performance with 28 points, 4 rebounds, 8 assists, and 2 steals.
Who led the Wizards in rebounds?
Justin Champagnie led Washington with 11 rebounds.
Who led the Magic in rebounds?
Wendell Carter Jr. led Orlando with 11 rebounds.
Did Orlando win the season series against Washington?
Yes. Orlando won three of the four meetings against Washington during the season.
What was the final score?
The Orlando Magic defeated the Washington Wizards 136-131 in overtime on March 13, 2026.
Conclusion
The orlando magic vs washington wizards match player stats from March 13, 2026, describe a game that was much closer than the teams’ season records might have suggested.
Washington received a major scoring performance from Bilal Coulibaly, who finished with 29 points, while Trae Young and Jamir Watkins each contributed six assists. Justin Champagnie added 11 rebounds, and the Wizards shot an excellent 88% from the free-throw line.
Orlando answered with a balanced attack. Jalen Suggs posted 28 points, 4 rebounds, 8 assists, and 2 steals, while Tristan da Silva added 26 points and Wendell Carter Jr. collected 11 rebounds.
The most decisive statistical difference was outside shooting. Washington attempted 46 three-pointers but converted only 30%. Orlando attempted 34 and made 44% of them. The Magic also finished with more assists, rebounds, and steals while committing fewer turnovers.
Ultimately, the game came down to overtime. Washington scored eight points in the extra period, but Orlando scored 13, producing the five-point victory and completing a 3-1 season-series advantage.
