Cleveland Guardians vs New York Yankees Match Player Stats

The cleveland guardians vs new york yankees match player stats from the June 2, 2026 game at Yankee Stadium tell a much more interesting story than the final score alone. Cleveland defeated New York 9-4 in a game that featured 20 combined hits, two home runs, several momentum swings, and a decisive late offensive burst. The Guardians finished with 12 hits and went 7-for-15 with runners in scoring position, while the Yankees collected eight hits but managed only 1-for-8 with runners in scoring position.

The game was especially notable for the contrast between individual production and overall offensive efficiency. Paul Goldschmidt accounted for all four Yankees runs, while José Ramírez and Travis Bazzana were central to Cleveland’s comeback and late separation. Kyle Manzardo also supplied a crucial two-run home run, and Cleveland’s bullpen held New York scoreless over the final five innings after Joey Cantillo’s four-inning outing.

The official game coverage and contemporary reports confirm the 9-4 Cleveland victory, Cam Schlittler’s 4 1/3-inning loss, Colin Holderman’s winning relief appearance, Ramírez’s three doubles, and Bazzana’s four-RBI performance.

Cleveland Guardians vs New York Yankees Match Player Stats: Game Overview

The matchup took place at Yankee Stadium in the Bronx in front of 41,045 fans. Cleveland entered the contest with a 35-27 record and an 18-13 mark on the road. New York was 36-24 overall and 17-10 at home.

Cleveland eventually won the game 9-4, improving its position in a series that the Guardians ultimately won 2-1.

Final Score and Team Production

Team	Runs	Hits	Errors	RISP	Left on Base
Cleveland Guardians	9	12	1	7-for-15	6
New York Yankees	4	8	1	1-for-8	8

The most important number in this table may be the difference in situational hitting.

Cleveland converted 7 of 15 opportunities with runners in scoring position, a .467 success rate. New York went 1-for-8, producing a .125 success rate.

That difference explains much of the four-run margin.

The Yankees actually received outstanding production from one of their middle-order hitters. Goldschmidt produced four RBIs by himself, but New York did not receive enough complementary production when opportunities appeared. Cleveland, by comparison, spread its offense across multiple hitters and repeatedly delivered in important situations.

A Game That Changed Direction Several Times

The scoring sequence shows how competitive the game was before Cleveland separated itself.

Cleveland opened the scoring in the third inning when Brayan Rocchio’s sacrifice fly brought Patrick Bailey home. New York answered with a two-run home run from Paul Goldschmidt, giving the Yankees a 2-1 advantage.

In the fourth, Kyle Manzardo hit a two-run homer that moved Cleveland back in front 3-2. New York responded again, with Goldschmidt delivering a two-run single that restored a 4-3 Yankees lead.

Cleveland tied the game in the fifth when Bazzana’s sacrifice fly scored Steven Kwan. Ramírez then doubled home Bailey, putting Cleveland ahead 5-4.

That one-run advantage became three in the seventh when Ramírez doubled home Rocchio.

The decisive blow arrived in the eighth. Bazzana delivered a bases-clearing double that scored Kwan, Angel Martínez and Daniel Schneemann, pushing the Cleveland advantage to 9-4.

From there, the Guardians’ bullpen completed the job.

Cleveland Guardians Batting Performance

Cleveland’s 12-hit attack was not simply a product of one outstanding hitter. The offense combined extra-base hitting, situational execution and timely contact throughout the game.

José Ramírez

José Ramírez was arguably the most complete offensive performer in the matchup.

His line was:

• 5 at-bats
• 3 hits
• 1 run
• 2 RBIs
• 3 doubles
• 0 strikeouts
• 0 walks

Ramírez’s three doubles were particularly important because they were not empty-base hits. Each one helped move Cleveland’s offense forward.

His first RBI double gave the Guardians a 5-4 lead in the fifth. His second RBI double extended the advantage to 6-4 in the seventh.

The three-double performance also demonstrated why extra-base production can matter more than simply counting total hits. Ramírez’s three hits generated substantial offensive value because all three went for extra bases.

He consistently put the ball in play and avoided a strikeout, allowing Cleveland to keep pressure on the Yankees’ pitching staff.

Travis Bazzana

Bazzana delivered the biggest single offensive moment of the game.

His final line was:

• 4 at-bats
• 1 hit
• 4 RBIs
• 1 sacrifice fly
• 1 double
• 0 walks
• 1 strikeout

The raw batting line does not immediately look spectacular because Bazzana collected only one hit.

The RBI total tells a different story.

His sacrifice fly in the fifth tied the game at 4-4. His bases-clearing double in the eighth produced three more runs and transformed a close 6-4 game into a 9-4 Cleveland lead.

That is a classic example of why player evaluation should not rely solely on batting average or hit totals.

Bazzana had one hit, but that hit was extremely valuable.

Contemporary reporting confirmed that the four RBIs represented a career high for Bazzana.

Kyle Manzardo

Manzardo supplied Cleveland’s home-run power.

His line was:

• 4 at-bats
• 2 hits
• 1 run
• 2 RBIs
• 1 home run
• 1 walk
• 2 strikeouts

His two-run home run in the fourth inning was particularly important because it prevented New York from controlling the game after Goldschmidt’s earlier homer.

Manzardo’s performance also gave Cleveland a different offensive dimension from Ramírez’s doubles and Bazzana’s situational hitting.

The Guardians did not need to rely on one type of offense.

They used power, doubles, sacrifice flies and base running to create pressure.

Steven Kwan

Kwan added two hits and scored twice:

• 4 at-bats
• 2 hits
• 2 runs
• 0 RBIs
• 0 walks
• 0 strikeouts

His production mattered because he repeatedly reached base and became part of Cleveland’s scoring sequence.

Kwan later scored in the eighth inning on Bazzana’s bases-clearing double, helping turn the game into a five-run Cleveland advantage.

Patrick Bailey and Brayan Rocchio

Patrick Bailey’s contribution was important even though his complete offensive line was less prominent than Ramírez’s or Bazzana’s.

Bailey produced a triple and scored twice during the game.

Rocchio also contributed with a sacrifice fly and two stolen bases were recorded for Cleveland, with Rocchio responsible for both of those steals according to the supplied game data.

These details illustrate how Cleveland generated offense without needing every player to produce a home run or multiple hits.

New York Yankees Batting Performance

New York recorded eight hits and four runs, but the offensive story was heavily concentrated around Paul Goldschmidt.

Paul Goldschmidt

Goldschmidt was clearly the Yankees’ standout hitter.

His line was:

• 5 at-bats
• 3 hits
• 1 run
• 4 RBIs
• 1 home run
• 1 double
• 0 walks
• 2 strikeouts

Most importantly, he drove in every Yankees run.

His two-run home run gave New York a 2-1 lead in the third inning.

His two-run single in the fourth restored the Yankees’ lead to 4-3.

From an individual perspective, this was an excellent performance.

From a team perspective, however, the Yankees needed more production around him.

When one hitter accounts for 100 percent of a team’s RBIs, it becomes much easier for the opposing pitching staff to limit the rest of the lineup.

Cody Bellinger

Bellinger recorded two hits in five at-bats.

His line included:

• 5 at-bats
• 2 hits
• 0 runs
• 0 RBIs
• 0 walks
• 0 strikeouts

Bellinger made consistent contact, but the Yankees could not turn those hits into enough scoring opportunities.

That distinction is important.

A hitter can perform well individually while the team’s offense still struggles.

The Yankees’ Situational Problem

The clearest weakness in New York’s offensive performance was its 1-for-8 record with runners in scoring position.

The Yankees had eight hits, but only one successful hit with runners in scoring position.

Cleveland, meanwhile, was 7-for-15.

That does not mean RISP performance is always stable or predictive. It can vary significantly from game to game.

But for this particular matchup, it was decisive.

The Yankees left eight runners on base compared with six for Cleveland, meaning New York had several opportunities but did not consistently convert them into runs.

Pitching Comparison

The pitching statistics reveal an unusual pattern.

Neither starting pitcher completed five innings, but the two bullpens produced very different outcomes.

Joey Cantillo

Cantillo started for Cleveland and worked four innings.

His line:

• 4.0 innings
• 6 hits
• 4 runs
• 4 earned runs
• 3 walks
• 4 strikeouts
• 1 home run

Cantillo’s outing was not dominant.

Allowing four runs in four innings normally places significant pressure on the bullpen.

Yet Cleveland’s relief corps responded exactly as the team needed.

Cantillo avoided giving up more than four runs, and the offense kept the game within reach.

His lack of length therefore became manageable because the bullpen did not allow the Yankees to add to their total.

Colin Holderman

Holderman was the winning pitcher.

His line:

• 1.0 inning
• 1 hit
• 0 runs
• 0 walks
• 2 strikeouts

The win is especially notable because Holderman entered after Cantillo had completed only four innings.

He immediately stabilized the game.

For a reliever, that can be more valuable than a conventional save situation because it prevents the opponent from taking control while the offense is still capable of producing runs.

Cleveland’s Bullpen

Cleveland received five scoreless innings from its relief pitchers.

The combined relief work included:

• Colin Holderman: 1.0 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 2 K
• Tim Herrin: 1.0 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 1 K
• Hunter Gaddis: 1.0 IP, 1 H, 0 R, 2 K
• Shawn Armstrong: 1.0 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 1 K
• Matt Festa: 1.0 IP, 0 H, 0 R, 1 K

That sequence was a major reason Cleveland won.

The bullpen combined to allow only two hits and no runs over the final five innings.

This is where the pitching story becomes more interesting than simply looking at the winning pitcher.

Holderman received the win, but the victory was a collective bullpen performance.

Cam Schlittler

Schlittler entered the game with an impressive record, but Cleveland managed to force him out before the completion of the fifth inning.

His final line:

• 4.1 innings
• 5 hits
• 5 runs
• 4 earned runs
• 0 walks
• 3 strikeouts
• 1 home run

The zero walks are important.

Schlittler did not lose because of poor control.

Instead, Cleveland’s hitters found ways to make damaging contact.

That distinction matters when analyzing the game.

A pitcher can throw strikes and still struggle if opposing hitters consistently produce quality contact.

Yankees Relief Pitching

New York’s bullpen produced mixed results.

Brent Headrick delivered 1.2 scoreless innings with four strikeouts, giving the Yankees a chance to keep the game close.

Tim Hill then allowed one run in one inning.

Camilo Doval had the most damaging relief appearance, allowing four hits and three earned runs in one inning.

Doval’s eighth inning was especially costly because Cleveland turned a 6-4 game into a 9-4 game.

Ryan Yarbrough completed the ninth without allowing a run.

The difference between the two bullpens was therefore not simply about strikeouts. It was about when the damage occurred.

Why Cleveland Won

The cleveland guardians vs new york yankees match player stats reveal five major reasons behind Cleveland’s victory.

1. Cleveland Won the RISP Battle

The Guardians went 7-for-15 with runners in scoring position.

The Yankees went 1-for-8.

That is a massive difference in offensive conversion.

Cleveland repeatedly turned opportunities into runs.

New York often failed to finish innings.

2. Cleveland Got More Production From Multiple Hitters

Ramírez produced three hits.

Manzardo produced two hits and a home run.

Kwan produced two hits.

Bazzana delivered four RBIs.

Bailey contributed extra-base contact.

This distribution made Cleveland’s offense difficult to neutralize.

New York’s offense was much more dependent on Goldschmidt.

3. Cleveland’s Bullpen Completely Changed the Game

The Guardians’ relief pitchers combined for five scoreless innings.

After the Yankees scored four runs through the first four innings, they were shut down for the remainder of the contest.

That allowed Cleveland’s offense to work with time and opportunities.

4. Cleveland Created a Decisive Eighth Inning

The eighth inning was the turning point.

Cleveland entered the inning leading only 6-4.

Doval then allowed a series of hits that loaded the bases.

Bazzana followed with a three-run double.

Suddenly, the Yankees needed five runs to tie.

The game effectively ended at that point.

5. Cleveland Produced More Extra-Base Damage

Cleveland recorded multiple doubles, a triple and a home run.

The Yankees also had extra-base production, especially from Goldschmidt, but Cleveland’s extra-base hits were more evenly distributed.

This gave the Guardians a stronger offensive rhythm throughout the game.

The Most Important Player Matchups

Individual matchups often explain why a baseball game shifts.

Ramírez vs Yankees Pitching

Ramírez repeatedly found ways to punish New York pitching.

His three doubles were the most notable offensive statistic in the game.

He did not need a home run to control the game.

Instead, he consistently produced hard extra-base contact and moved runners into scoring position.

Manzardo vs Schlittler

Manzardo’s two-run home run in the fourth inning was a critical response to New York’s two-run Goldschmidt homer.

The Yankees had just taken the lead.

Manzardo immediately answered.

That kept Cleveland from falling behind psychologically and strategically.

Bazzana vs Doval

This was the most important late-game matchup.

With the bases loaded in the eighth, Bazzana produced a three-run double.

The result was a five-run Cleveland lead.

For Doval, the inning represented the point at which the game moved beyond a realistic comeback scenario.

For Bazzana, it became the defining moment of his four-RBI performance.

Team Statistics That Tell the Real Story

Traditional box-score statistics can sometimes hide the reason a team won.

This game does not require complicated advanced metrics to understand, but several simple comparisons are revealing.

Hits

Cleveland had 12 hits.

New York had eight.

That four-hit advantage is meaningful, but it does not fully explain the result.

Runs

Cleveland scored nine.

New York scored four.

The five-run difference was created largely through better timing and situational execution.

Home Runs

Both teams hit one home run.

Cleveland’s homer came from Manzardo.

New York’s came from Goldschmidt.

Because the home-run count was even, this was not a game decided by Cleveland simply hitting more balls over the fence.

Strikeouts

Cleveland hitters struck out 12 times.

Yankees hitters struck out 11 times.

Interestingly, Cleveland won despite striking out slightly more often.

That is another reminder that strikeout totals alone do not determine offensive success.

Walks

Cleveland drew two walks.

New York drew three.

The Yankees therefore had a small advantage in walks but still lost by five runs.

This reinforces the importance of what happens after players reach base.

Player-by-Player Statistical Takeaways

Guardians

José Ramírez: 5 AB, 3 H, 1 R, 2 RBI, 3 doubles

Travis Bazzana: 4 AB, 1 H, 4 RBI, 1 double, 1 sacrifice fly

Kyle Manzardo: 4 AB, 2 H, 1 R, 2 RBI, 1 HR, 1 BB

Steven Kwan: 4 AB, 2 H, 2 R

Patrick Bailey: contributed a triple and scored twice

Brayan Rocchio: contributed a sacrifice fly and two stolen bases

The most interesting aspect of Cleveland’s batting was the variety of contributions.

Yankees

Paul Goldschmidt: 5 AB, 3 H, 1 R, 4 RBI, 1 HR, 1 double

Cody Bellinger: 5 AB, 2 H

Goldschmidt was the clear offensive leader for New York, but the rest of the lineup could not generate enough run production.

What the Game Says About Offensive Efficiency

One of the most useful lessons from this matchup is that offensive success is not simply about accumulating hits.

Cleveland had 12 hits, but its 7-for-15 RISP performance was arguably more important.

The Guardians repeatedly converted favorable situations.

New York had eight hits and three walks, yet finished 1-for-8 with runners in scoring position.

That means the Yankees reached enough base to create opportunities, but the final step was missing.

For analysts, this distinction matters.

A team can have a respectable number of baserunners and still lose because those baserunners are not converted into runs.

Cleveland was better at completing the sequence.

What the Pitching Numbers Tell Us

The starting pitching numbers also require context.

Cantillo gave Cleveland only four innings.

Schlittler gave New York 4.1 innings.

At first glance, neither performance looks particularly strong.

But Cleveland’s bullpen responded with five scoreless innings.

New York’s bullpen allowed four runs across its relief appearances.

That created a major late-game advantage.

The Guardians effectively turned a game that was tied 4-4 into a five-run victory without allowing another Yankees run after the fourth inning.

That is an important example of why baseball games are often decided by the interaction between starters and relievers rather than by one pitcher alone.

The Turning Point: Cleveland’s Eighth Inning

The eighth inning deserves special attention because it changed the statistical shape of the game.

Cleveland entered the inning with a 6-4 lead.

That is not an insurmountable advantage at Yankee Stadium.

A two-run deficit can disappear quickly.

Instead, Cleveland attacked Doval and created a bases-loaded situation.

Bazzana then produced the three-run double.

The score moved from 6-4 to 9-4.

The Yankees had no answer in the bottom of the inning and could not recover in the ninth.

This sequence demonstrates the value of maintaining pressure even after taking a lead.

Cleveland did not simply protect its advantage.

It expanded it.

Historical Context of the Matchup

The Guardians and Yankees have a long history of postseason and regular-season meetings, which gives games between these clubs an additional layer of interest.

However, individual-game analysis should remain focused on the actual performance in front of us.

It would be misleading to assume that previous meetings automatically predict future results.

What this particular game demonstrates is that Cleveland’s approach was effective against New York’s pitching on this night.

Ramírez’s extra-base hitting, Bazzana’s situational production and the Guardians’ relief pitching were the defining factors.

For broader statistical research, readers should distinguish between historical head-to-head trends and the specific evidence from a single game.

How to Read These Player Stats Correctly

When reviewing a box score, it is tempting to identify the player with the most hits and immediately call that player the best performer.

This game provides a useful counterexample.

Ramírez had three hits and was arguably Cleveland’s most consistent hitter.

Bazzana had only one hit but drove in four runs.

Manzardo had two hits, including a home run.

All three contributed differently.

The same applies to Goldschmidt.

His three hits and four RBIs were outstanding, yet the Yankees lost because the rest of the offense did not convert enough opportunities.

The best analysis therefore combines:

1. Hits
2. Runs
3. RBIs
4. Extra-base hits
5. Situational hitting
6. Pitching efficiency
7. Bullpen performance
8. Defensive execution
9. Base running
10. Timing of production

Looking at all ten gives a much clearer picture than focusing on one statistic.

Defensive and Base-Running Details

Cleveland and New York each committed one error.

The Guardians’ fielding error was charged to Patrick Bailey.

New York’s error was charged to Amed Rosario.

The game also featured several stolen bases.

Cleveland recorded steals by Brayan Rocchio and Angel Martínez, while New York recorded steals by Cody Bellinger, José Caballero and Anthony Volpe.

These plays did not dominate the final score, but they demonstrate how both teams attempted to create additional offensive value beyond traditional hitting.

Base running becomes especially useful in close games because advancing without requiring a hit can create scoring opportunities.

What Cleveland Did Better Than New York

The simplest summary is that Cleveland played the complete game more effectively.

The Guardians:

• Collected more hits
• Produced more extra-base hits
• Converted more RISP opportunities
• Scored in several different innings
• Held New York scoreless after the fourth
• Received a major late-game contribution from Bazzana
• Got three doubles from Ramírez
• Used their bullpen effectively

The Yankees:

• Received four RBIs from Goldschmidt
• Produced eight hits
• Had three walks
• Hit one home run
• Struggled with RISP opportunities
• Could not add a run after the fourth inning
• Allowed Cleveland to create a three-run eighth inning

That combination explains the 9-4 result.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who was the best hitter in the Guardians vs Yankees game?

José Ramírez was Cleveland’s most consistent offensive performer, going 3-for-5 with three doubles and two RBIs. Travis Bazzana was also crucial because he produced four RBIs.

How many hits did the Guardians have?

Cleveland recorded 12 hits in the 9-4 victory.

How many RBIs did Paul Goldschmidt have?

Paul Goldschmidt drove in all four Yankees runs, finishing with four RBIs, three hits and a home run.

Who won the Guardians vs Yankees game?

The Cleveland Guardians won 9-4 at Yankee Stadium.

Who was the winning pitcher?

Colin Holderman earned the win after pitching one scoreless inning with one hit allowed and two strikeouts.

Why did the Yankees lose despite Goldschmidt’s performance?

New York struggled with runners in scoring position, going 1-for-8, while Cleveland went 7-for-15. The Guardians also received five scoreless innings from their bullpen.

Conclusion

The cleveland guardians vs new york yankees match player stats show a game decided by more than the final 9-4 score.

Cleveland’s offense was deeper and more timely. José Ramírez produced three doubles and two RBIs, Kyle Manzardo supplied a two-run homer, Steven Kwan reached base twice and scored twice, while Travis Bazzana delivered the decisive four-RBI performance.

For New York, Paul Goldschmidt was exceptional. His three hits, home run and four RBIs accounted for every Yankees run. Cody Bellinger also collected two hits, but the lineup did not convert enough opportunities.

The largest statistical difference was situational hitting. Cleveland went 7-for-15 with runners in scoring position, while New York went 1-for-8. That gap, combined with Cleveland’s five scoreless relief innings, explains why the Guardians were able to turn a competitive game into a comfortable victory.

The pitching story is equally important. Joey Cantillo did not provide length, but Holderman and the rest of Cleveland’s bullpen prevented New York from scoring after the fourth inning. Schlittler, meanwhile, allowed five runs over 4 1/3 innings, and Doval’s eighth-inning struggles allowed Cleveland to create the final five-run margin.

Ultimately, this was a strong example of how baseball games are shaped by timing. Cleveland did not simply collect more hits. The Guardians made their hits matter when runners were in scoring position, answered New York’s scoring bursts, and then delivered the decisive blow in the eighth inning.