New York Liberty vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats
The new york liberty vs indiana fever match player stats from July 19, 2026, tell the story of a game that changed sharply after halftime. The Indiana Fever defeated the New York Liberty 108-88 at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis. Indiana produced its biggest offensive push in the third and fourth quarters, while New York struggled to maintain its early scoring pace.
The 20-point final margin does not fully explain how the game developed. New York led 28-22 after the opening quarter and remained ahead 49-45 at halftime. Indiana then exploded for 30 points in the third quarter and added 33 more in the fourth. The Fever turned a four-point halftime deficit into a convincing home victory.
Kelsey Mitchell led all scorers with 33 points and delivered one of the most efficient offensive performances of the game. She shot 10-of-14 from the field, made 4-of-6 three-point attempts, and converted 9-of-13 free throws. Breanna Stewart led New York with 26 points and 8 rebounds, while Caitlin Clark finished with 7 assists for Indiana.
The result also meant that the season series between the teams finished tied at 2-2. That makes the individual performances and statistical differences especially useful for understanding how Indiana controlled this particular matchup.
New York Liberty vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The basic numbers immediately show the difference between the teams.
| Category | New York Liberty | Indiana Fever |
| Final Score | 88 | 108 |
| Field Goals | 30-67 | 37-69 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 45% | 54% |
| Three-Pointers | 13-32 | 14-28 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 41% | 50% |
| Free Throws | 15-25 | 20-27 |
| Free Throw Percentage | 60% | 74% |
| Rebounds | 27 | 32 |
| Assists | 19 | 22 |
| Turnovers | 15 | 16 |
| Steals | 8 | 7 |
| Blocks | 6 | 5 |
Indiana did not win because of one statistical category alone. The Fever were more efficient from the field, more accurate from three-point range, better at the free-throw line, and stronger on the glass.
The biggest difference was shooting efficiency.
Indiana made 37 of 69 field-goal attempts, which was 54%. New York made 30 of 67, or 45%. That seven-field-goal difference was significant because both teams attempted a similar number of shots.
The three-point numbers were also important. Indiana made 14 of 28 attempts, exactly 50%. New York made 13 of 32, or 41%. The Liberty actually made only one fewer three-pointer, but Indiana needed four fewer attempts to reach that total.
Free throws created another efficiency gap. Indiana converted 20 of 27 attempts, while New York made only 15 of 25.
These numbers show why the final score became so large despite New York entering halftime with the lead.
How the Game Changed After Halftime
The most important part of the box score is the quarter-by-quarter scoring.
First Quarter
New York opened the game strongly, scoring 28 points compared with Indiana’s 22.
That six-point advantage gave the Liberty early control. Their offense was productive enough to establish a lead, and their shooting allowed them to dictate the opening pace.
Indiana was still within one possession range, however. A six-point deficit after one quarter is small enough to disappear quickly, especially when the home team can create better offensive possessions.
Second Quarter
Indiana responded in the second quarter.
The Fever scored 23 points while New York scored 21. That narrowed the gap by two points, but New York still entered halftime with a 49-45 advantage.
At this stage, the game was competitive and the eventual 20-point margin was not visible from the scoreboard.
The halftime numbers are useful because they establish an important context. Indiana did not dominate from the opening tip. The Fever’s decisive performance came after the break.
Third Quarter
The third quarter completely changed the game.
Indiana scored 30 points.
New York scored only 12.
That created an 18-point swing in one quarter.
The Fever entered the third quarter trailing by four. By the end of the period, they had transformed the deficit into a 14-point lead.
This was the decisive stretch of the contest.
Indiana’s improved shooting efficiency, combined with New York’s offensive slowdown, allowed the Fever to control both the scoreboard and momentum.
Fourth Quarter
Indiana did not allow New York to recover.
The Fever scored 33 points in the final quarter, while the Liberty scored 27.
New York improved offensively compared with the third quarter, but Indiana continued scoring at a high level.
The fourth-quarter production ensured that the third-quarter advantage was not temporary. Indiana finished the game with 108 points and won by 20.
Kelsey Mitchell’s 33-Point Performance
Kelsey Mitchell was the leading scorer and one of the clearest statistical reasons for Indiana’s offensive success.
She finished with 33 points while shooting:
- 10-of-14 from the field
- 4-of-6 from three-point range
- 9-of-13 from the free-throw line
That combination is important because Mitchell contributed efficiently from all three scoring areas.
Her four three-pointers provided spacing and perimeter scoring. Her nine made free throws added another major source of points.
Mitchell did not need a high volume of field-goal attempts to reach 33 points. She attempted 14 field goals and made 10.
That is a strong shooting conversion rate and helps explain why Indiana’s overall field-goal percentage reached 54%.
Her performance was especially important in a game where Indiana needed to overcome a halftime deficit. A high-efficiency scoring performance can change a game quickly, particularly when it comes alongside accurate perimeter shooting.
Breanna Stewart Leads New York
Breanna Stewart was New York’s leading scorer and rebounder.
She recorded:
- 26 points
- 8 rebounds
- 10-of-16 field goals
- 2-of-4 three-pointers
- 4-of-9 free throws
Stewart’s 10 made field goals were the most among New York’s listed key scorers.
Her 26 points also represented a significant portion of the Liberty’s 88-point total.
The problem for New York was not simply Stewart’s production. She produced efficiently from the field, but Indiana generated more overall scoring efficiency and received major contributions from its offensive players.
Stewart also collected eight rebounds, giving New York a strong individual presence on the glass.
However, the Liberty finished with 27 total rebounds compared with Indiana’s 32. That five-rebound difference added another advantage for the Fever.
Caitlin Clark’s Playmaking Impact
Caitlin Clark did not lead Indiana in scoring, but her seven assists were important to the overall offensive structure.
Clark shot:
- 5-of-14 from the field
- 2-of-8 from three-point range
- 5-of-5 from the free-throw line
She finished with seven assists, which was the highest listed total for Indiana.
Her shooting numbers were less efficient than Mitchell’s, but the seven assists demonstrate a different type of contribution.
Basketball production is not limited to points. A guard can influence the game through passing, ball movement, shot creation, and opportunities for teammates.
Indiana finished with 22 assists as a team. New York had 19.
The three-assist difference was not enormous, but it aligned with the broader pattern of Indiana creating a slightly more productive team offense.
Aliyah Boston’s Efficient Contribution
Aliyah Boston was Indiana’s leading rebounder with seven boards.
She also shot 6-of-11 from the field, 1-of-2 from three-point range, and 2-of-3 from the free-throw line.
Boston’s production complemented the scoring of Mitchell and the playmaking of Clark.
Her six made field goals helped Indiana maintain its offensive efficiency, while her seven rebounds contributed to the Fever’s 32-rebound team total.
This is one reason box-score analysis should not focus exclusively on the highest scorer.
Mitchell supplied the headline scoring performance. Clark supplied seven assists. Boston contributed on the glass and scored efficiently.
Those different contributions combined to produce a balanced Indiana attack.
Sabrina Ionescu and Jonquel Jones
New York also received important production from Sabrina Ionescu and Jonquel Jones.
Ionescu shot:
- 4-of-9 from the field
- 2-of-4 from three-point range
- 2-of-4 from the free-throw line
Jones shot:
- 4-of-9 from the field
- 2-of-4 from three-point range
- 3-of-3 from the free-throw line
Both players made two three-pointers.
Their perimeter shooting helped New York finish 13-of-32 from beyond the arc.
However, the Liberty attempted 32 three-pointers compared with Indiana’s 28. Indiana made 14 while using fewer attempts.
That small difference illustrates an important lesson from the game: volume and efficiency are not the same thing.
New York generated plenty of three-point attempts. Indiana simply converted its opportunities at a higher rate.
Shooting Efficiency Decided the Matchup
The clearest statistical difference between the teams was shooting efficiency.
Indiana finished at 54% from the field.
New York finished at 45%.
That nine-percentage-point gap is substantial.
Both teams attempted a similar number of field goals:
- Indiana: 69 attempts
- New York: 67 attempts
Indiana therefore did not need a dramatically higher number of possessions to score more points. The Fever simply converted a larger share of their opportunities.
The three-point comparison tells a similar story.
Indiana:
- 14 made
- 28 attempts
- 50%
New York:
- 13 made
- 32 attempts
- 41%
Indiana made only one more three-pointer, but did so on four fewer attempts.
That is a major efficiency advantage.
Free Throws Added Another Layer
Free-throw shooting also favored Indiana.
The Fever made 20 of 27 attempts.
The Liberty made 15 of 25.
That created a five-point difference in made free throws.
Indiana also converted at a higher percentage:
- Indiana: 74%
- New York: 60%
The free-throw line therefore provided Indiana with both additional scoring and better efficiency.
When a game finishes with a 20-point difference, no single category should automatically be treated as the only explanation. In this case, however, field-goal efficiency, three-point efficiency, and free-throw efficiency all pointed in the same direction.
Rebounding Comparison
Indiana finished with 32 rebounds.
New York finished with 27.
The Fever therefore held a five-rebound advantage.
Aliyah Boston led Indiana with seven rebounds, while Breanna Stewart led New York with eight.
This creates an interesting individual-versus-team contrast.
Stewart had more rebounds than any listed Indiana player, but Indiana still won the overall rebounding battle.
That suggests the Fever received more collective contribution on the glass.
Rebounding can also help maintain offensive pressure. Extra possessions can create additional scoring opportunities, while defensive rebounds can prevent the opponent from extending possessions.
The five-rebound difference was not enormous, but it contributed to Indiana’s overall statistical edge.
Assists and Ball Movement
Indiana recorded 22 assists.
New York recorded 19.
The three-assist difference was relatively small, but it fits the game’s overall offensive pattern.
Caitlin Clark led Indiana with seven assists, while Pauline Astier led New York with five.
This means Clark accounted for a substantial portion of Indiana’s recorded assists.
New York still moved the ball effectively at times, but Indiana’s slightly higher assist total accompanied its superior shooting performance.
Good passing does not guarantee efficient scoring. However, when strong ball movement is combined with accurate shooting, the offensive result can become difficult to contain.
That combination became especially visible in Indiana’s 30-point third quarter.
Turnovers Were Surprisingly Close
Turnovers did not explain the game as strongly as shooting.
Indiana committed 16 turnovers.
New York committed 15.
That means the Fever turned the ball over only one more time.
Given the 20-point final margin, this is useful context.
The game was not decided by a huge turnover disparity.
New York also recorded eight steals compared with Indiana’s seven.
So the Liberty actually had a slight advantage in steals.
This reinforces the importance of looking at multiple categories instead of assuming that the winning team must have dominated every statistical area.
Indiana won despite committing one more turnover and recording one fewer steal.
Its advantage came primarily from scoring efficiency and overall offensive execution.
The Third Quarter Was the Turning Point
If one quarter must be highlighted, it is the third.
Indiana scored 30 points.
New York scored 12.
That 18-point difference completely changed the game.
The Fever entered halftime down four points. After the third quarter, they led by 14.
The fourth quarter then extended that advantage.
This is important when analyzing a final box score because the final margin can hide the sequence of events.
A 108-88 score might suggest Indiana controlled the entire contest.
It did not.
New York actually led at halftime.
The decisive story was Indiana’s post-halftime response.
For analysts, this is one of the most useful lessons from the game. Looking only at final totals can miss when the game actually changed.
Team Records and Home-Court Context
The game was played at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis, with an attendance of 17,274.
Entering the game, Indiana had a 16-10 record and a 10-5 home record.
New York entered at 13-12 overall and 6-7 on the road.
Those records provide useful context for the result.
Indiana was playing at home and had already established a stronger home record. New York entered with a losing road record.
However, those facts should not be treated as the sole explanation for the result.
The actual game statistics provide stronger evidence about what happened on July 19.
Indiana shot 54%, made 50% of its three-point attempts, outrebounded New York by five, and scored 63 points after halftime.
Those are direct indicators from the game itself.
Season Series Finished 2-2
The July 19 result also completed a tied season series.
The teams finished 2-2 against each other.
That matters because it places this result within a broader four-game matchup rather than presenting it as an isolated head-to-head outcome.
Indiana won this particular game by 20 points.
But the season series being tied at 2-2 means neither team had a winning edge across the four meetings based on the supplied results.
For readers researching head-to-head performance, this distinction is important.
One game can show how a team performed on a particular night. A season series provides a wider sample.
What the Player Stats Reveal
The most useful way to interpret these new york liberty vs indiana fever match player stats is to connect individual performances with team outcomes.
Several patterns stand out.
Indiana Had Multiple Offensive Answers
The Fever did not depend on only one player.
Mitchell scored 33 points.
Clark contributed seven assists.
Boston grabbed seven rebounds and shot 6-of-11.
This gave Indiana different ways to produce offense.
New York Had a Strong Primary Scorer
Stewart scored 26 points and grabbed eight rebounds.
She also shot 10-of-16 from the field.
Her individual numbers were strong, but the Liberty needed more overall efficiency to match Indiana’s output.
Efficiency Was More Important Than Shot Volume
New York attempted 32 three-pointers.
Indiana attempted 28.
Yet Indiana made one more three-pointer.
That is a clear example of how accuracy can outweigh volume.
The Game Was Won After the Break
New York led at halftime.
Indiana then outscored New York 63-39 over the final two quarters.
That second-half difference explains the final result more clearly than the first-half statistics.
Key Statistical Takeaways
For readers who want the fastest possible summary, these are the most important numbers:
- Indiana won 108-88.
- New York led 49-45 at halftime.
- Indiana scored 30 points in the third quarter.
- Indiana scored 33 points in the fourth quarter.
- Kelsey Mitchell scored 33 points.
- Breanna Stewart scored 26 points and grabbed 8 rebounds.
- Caitlin Clark recorded 7 assists.
- Aliyah Boston grabbed 7 rebounds.
- Indiana shot 54% from the field.
- New York shot 45%.
- Indiana shot 50% from three-point range.
- New York shot 41% from three.
- Indiana made 20 free throws.
- New York made 15 free throws.
- Indiana outrebounded New York 32-27.
- Indiana recorded 22 assists compared with New York’s 19.
- The season series finished tied 2-2.
Why the Box Score Matters Beyond the Final Score
A box score is most useful when it answers more than one question.
The first question is simple: who won?
Indiana won 108-88.
The second question is how?
The answer is more detailed.
Indiana converted 54% of its field goals, 50% of its threes, and 74% of its free throws. The Fever also won the rebounding battle and recorded more assists.
The third question is when?
The answer is the second half, particularly the third quarter.
The fourth question is who?
Mitchell provided the biggest scoring performance. Clark provided seven assists. Boston contributed on the boards. Stewart led New York’s scoring and rebounding.
That combination of team and player statistics gives a much clearer picture than the final score alone.
How to Read Similar WNBA Match Player Stats
Readers comparing future games can use a simple process.
Start With the Score
Identify the winner and final margin.
Check Quarter Scoring
Look for the quarter where the largest scoring difference occurred.
Compare Field-Goal Efficiency
Field-goal percentage often explains broad offensive efficiency.
Examine Three-Point Shooting
Look at both attempts and percentage.
A team can attempt more threes without actually shooting better.
Check Free Throws
Free throws can add a meaningful scoring advantage.
Compare Rebounds
Rebounding shows which team controlled more missed-shot opportunities.
Review Assists and Turnovers
These numbers help explain offensive organization and possession management.
Identify the Main Individual Performers
Look beyond the top scorer.
A winning team often gets contributions from scoring, passing, and rebounding simultaneously.
This method can be applied to official box scores and league statistics. For authoritative WNBA information, readers can also consult the WNBA official website.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the New York Liberty vs Indiana Fever game on July 19, 2026?
The Indiana Fever defeated the New York Liberty 108-88 at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis.
Who was the leading scorer?
Kelsey Mitchell was the leading scorer with 33 points for Indiana.
How many points did Breanna Stewart score?
Breanna Stewart scored 26 points for New York and also led the Liberty with 8 rebounds.
How many assists did Caitlin Clark have?
Caitlin Clark recorded 7 assists for Indiana.
Which team shot better from the field?
Indiana shot 54% from the field, while New York shot 45%.
What was the season series between the teams?
The supplied game data shows that the season series finished tied 2-2.
Conclusion
The new york liberty vs indiana fever match player stats from July 19, 2026, show how quickly a competitive game can change through shooting efficiency and second-half execution.
New York started better and led 28-22 after the first quarter. The Liberty also held a 49-45 advantage at halftime. Indiana’s response after the break was the defining part of the game.
The Fever scored 30 points in the third quarter and 33 in the fourth. New York managed 12 and 27 points in those periods.
Kelsey Mitchell’s 33 points were the headline individual performance. Her 10-of-14 field-goal shooting, 4-of-6 three-point shooting, and 9-of-13 free-throw shooting demonstrated strong scoring efficiency.
Breanna Stewart remained highly productive for New York with 26 points and 8 rebounds. Caitlin Clark contributed seven assists, while Aliyah Boston added seven rebounds and efficient shooting.
At team level, Indiana finished with a 54% field-goal percentage, 50% three-point shooting, 32 rebounds, and 22 assists. New York finished at 45% from the field, 41% from three, 27 rebounds, and 19 assists.
The most important takeaway is that the final score was driven by a dramatic second-half shift rather than complete control from the opening minute. Indiana’s ability to turn a four-point halftime deficit into a 20-point victory was the defining feature of the contest.
The season series ultimately finished 2-2, adding further context to a matchup that produced another significant statistical contrast.
