Utah Jazz vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats
The utah jazz vs golden state warriors match player stats from the January 4, 2026 matchup tell a much more interesting story than the final score alone. Golden State defeated Utah 123-114 at Chase Center in San Francisco, but the Warriors had to overcome a strong opening stretch from the Jazz and a major scoring performance from Lauri Markkanen. Stephen Curry eventually changed the game with a spectacular third quarter, while Golden State’s supporting cast helped turn a competitive contest into a nine-point victory.
The game was played at Chase Center in front of 18,064 fans. Utah entered the matchup at 12-22 overall and 4-11 on the road, while Golden State improved to 19-17 and 11-5 at home with the win. The official NBA game record confirms the 123-114 final score and the quarter-by-quarter progression.
For anyone studying the utah jazz vs golden state warriors match player stats, the most important lesson is that Utah actually produced several impressive individual numbers. Markkanen scored 35 points, Keyonte George added 22 points and nine assists, and Kevin Love contributed 10 rebounds. Golden State, however, generated the more decisive combination of three-point shooting, second-half execution, rebounding and Curry’s third-quarter scoring burst.
Game Overview
The Warriors did not dominate this game from the opening tip.
Utah led 29-25 after the first quarter and extended that advantage by halftime. The Jazz scored 36 points in the second period, compared with 33 from Golden State, giving Utah a 65-58 halftime lead.
That seven-point halftime advantage was significant because it showed that Golden State’s eventual victory was a comeback rather than a wire-to-wire performance.
The third quarter changed everything.
Golden State scored 42 points in the period while limiting Utah to 31. That 11-point swing erased the Jazz’s halftime advantage and gave the Warriors an 11-point lead heading into the fourth quarter. Golden State then controlled the final period 23-18.
| Game Detail | Utah Jazz | Golden State Warriors |
| Final Score | 114 | 123 |
| First Quarter | 29 | 25 |
| Second Quarter | 36 | 33 |
| Third Quarter | 31 | 42 |
| Fourth Quarter | 18 | 23 |
| Field Goals | 45-86 | 43-87 |
| Field Goal % | 52% | 49% |
| Three-Pointers | 13-35 | 19-45 |
| Three-Point % | 37% | 42% |
| Free Throws | 11-17 | 18-24 |
| Rebounds | 37 | 45 |
| Assists | 32 | 32 |
| Turnovers | 15 | 14 |
| Steals | 7 | 9 |
| Blocks | 2 | 2 |
The statistical contrast is particularly revealing. Utah shot better overall from the field, but Golden State made six more three-pointers and eight more free throws. That combination gave the Warriors enough scoring efficiency to overcome Utah’s superior overall field-goal percentage.
Utah Jazz vs Golden State Warriors Match Player Stats: Utah’s Top Performers
The utah jazz vs golden state warriors match player stats show that Utah’s offensive attack was not the reason the team lost.
The Jazz scored 114 points and shot 52% from the field. Their 32 assists also indicate that the offense was capable of creating quality opportunities. The problem was that Golden State produced more efficient high-value scoring and controlled the game better after halftime.
Lauri Markkanen
Lauri Markkanen was Utah’s standout scorer.
He finished with:
| Statistic | Markkanen |
| Points | 35 |
| Field Goals | 15-27 |
| FG% | 55.6% |
| Three-Pointers | 2-8 |
| Three-Point % | 25% |
| Free Throws | 3-4 |
| Rebounds | 6 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Turnovers | 1 |
| Fouls | 3 |
Markkanen’s 35 points came on 15 made field goals, giving him one of the most efficient high-volume scoring performances on either side.
The official NBA box score lists him at 40:45 of playing time, with 15 made shots on 27 attempts.
His performance was especially strong early. According to the game report, Markkanen scored 21 points in the first half while shooting 9-for-12 during that stretch.
That matters because Utah’s first-half success was closely connected to Markkanen’s ability to score efficiently before Golden State adjusted.
His three-point shooting, however, was less effective. He made only two of eight attempts from deep. That created an important contrast: Markkanen was highly productive overall, but Golden State’s broader three-point attack generated greater value from outside.
Keyonte George
Keyonte George delivered one of Utah’s most complete offensive performances.
He recorded:
- 22 points
- 9 assists
- Strong involvement in Utah’s half-court creation
His nine assists were particularly important because they show that George was not simply looking for his own scoring opportunities.
George helped organize Utah’s offense while Markkanen served as the primary scoring threat. When a young guard can combine 22 points with nine assists against a team featuring experienced defenders and an elite offensive creator such as Curry, it becomes one of the more meaningful individual takeaways from the game.
The challenge for Utah was sustaining that production after Golden State increased its pressure and offensive pace in the third quarter.
Brice Sensabaugh
Brice Sensabaugh scored 12 points.
He was Utah’s third-highest scorer and provided another source of offensive production behind Markkanen and George.
His 12 points were important in keeping Utah’s offense balanced. However, the Jazz needed more scoring from the remainder of the rotation once Golden State began pulling away.
Kevin Love
Kevin Love provided one of Utah’s most useful all-around stat lines:
- 5 points
- 10 rebounds
- 5 assists
His scoring contribution was modest, but the rebounding and passing numbers added value.
The five assists are especially notable because Utah finished with 32 total assists. Love’s ability to facilitate from the frontcourt gave the Jazz another passing option and helped prevent the offense from becoming completely dependent on Markkanen and George.
His 10 rebounds also made him Utah’s leading rebounder in the game.
Isaiah Collier
Isaiah Collier produced an intriguing multi-category performance:
- 8 points
- 5 rebounds
- 7 assists
- 3 steals
- 1 block
The scoring number does not immediately stand out, but the defensive activity and playmaking do.
Three steals and a block indicate that Collier contributed beyond scoring. Seven assists also made him an important secondary creator.
For evaluating a young guard, this is exactly why a basic points-only comparison can be misleading. A player can have a relatively quiet scoring night while still influencing possession quality, ball movement and defensive pressure.
Svi Mykhailiuk
Svi Mykhailiuk scored 10 points on 4-of-6 shooting, including two made three-pointers.
His shooting efficiency was useful for Utah because the Jazz needed perimeter players capable of converting opportunities created by Markkanen and George.
He also finished with three rebounds and two assists.
Other Utah Contributors
Kyle Filipowski scored seven points and added one rebound and one assist.
Cody Williams finished with six points and three rebounds.
Walter Clayton Jr. recorded eight points, three rebounds and two assists.
Taylor Hendricks contributed one point, two rebounds and three assists.
Individually, these numbers were not enough to match Golden State’s collective scoring depth. That became increasingly important once the Warriors found their rhythm in the third quarter.
Golden State Warriors Player Performance
Golden State’s biggest advantage was not simply Curry.
The Warriors received meaningful contributions from multiple players, allowing the team to survive Utah’s strong first half and eventually take control.
Stephen Curry
Stephen Curry was the game’s most important player.
He finished with:
| Statistic | Stephen Curry |
| Points | 31 |
| Three-Pointers | 6 |
| Assists | 5 |
| Rebounds | 5 |
Curry’s 31 points led Golden State, and his six three-pointers were central to the Warriors’ offensive turnaround. The official NBA report also confirms that Curry scored 20 points in the third quarter.
That third quarter is the clearest explanation for the final result.
Golden State entered halftime trailing 65-58. Curry then became the focal point of the comeback, scoring 20 points during the third period. He made six of seven shots in that quarter and hit multiple three-pointers that shifted momentum toward Golden State.
This is why simply looking at Curry’s final 31-point total does not fully explain his impact.
The timing of those points mattered.
Twenty of his 31 points came in a single quarter when Golden State needed to erase a deficit. That made his scoring disproportionately influential to the game’s outcome.
Jimmy Butler III
Jimmy Butler III scored 15 points and added seven assists.
His scoring matched Quinten Post for second place on Golden State, but his passing contribution made his overall impact broader.
Seven assists helped Golden State maintain offensive movement while Curry attracted defensive attention.
Butler’s value in this game therefore extended beyond his 15 points. His playmaking helped connect Golden State’s primary offensive threats with its supporting players.
Quinten Post
Quinten Post also scored 15 points.
His production gave Golden State another reliable scoring option and helped prevent the Jazz from focusing exclusively on Curry.
When an opposing defense has to account for several credible scoring threats, double teams become more difficult to sustain. That principle was visible here as Golden State’s offense became increasingly effective after halftime.
De’Anthony Melton
De’Anthony Melton recorded:
- 13 points
- 7 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 2 steals
His seven rebounds were valuable for a guard-sized perimeter player, while two steals added defensive pressure.
Melton’s performance illustrates the difference between a team’s leading scorer and its overall winning formula. Curry supplied the headline scoring, but contributions like Melton’s helped Golden State win more possessions.
Gary Payton II
Gary Payton II finished with:
- 10 points
- 8 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 1 steal
- 1 block
His eight rebounds were particularly valuable.
Golden State finished with 45 total rebounds compared with 37 for Utah. Payton’s contribution therefore fit directly into one of the Warriors’ statistical advantages.
Trayce Jackson-Davis
Trayce Jackson-Davis added nine points and six rebounds.
His interior presence helped Golden State generate additional possessions and maintain a physical advantage on the glass.
Draymond Green
Draymond Green scored eight points, with three rebounds, two assists and one block.
His offensive statistics were not spectacular, but his game was unusual because he was ejected in the second quarter after receiving consecutive technical fouls. The official game report confirms that Green was ejected with 2:25 remaining in the second period.
That makes Golden State’s third-quarter performance even more noteworthy. The Warriors did not have Green available after halftime, yet they produced their best scoring quarter of the game.
Brandin Podziemski
Brandin Podziemski recorded six points, six rebounds and eight assists.
His eight assists were tied to Golden State’s strong ball movement and gave the Warriors another high-level facilitator.
Moses Moody and Will Richard
Moses Moody finished with eight points, two rebounds and two assists.
Will Richard added eight points and two rebounds.
These contributions mattered because Golden State did not rely entirely on its headline stars to produce offense.
Gui Santos
Gui Santos recorded no points, one rebound, two assists and one steal.
Although his scoring output was zero, the defensive and passing statistics show that not every rotation contribution should be evaluated through points alone.
How the Game Changed in the Third Quarter
The third quarter was the defining statistical event.
Utah had scored 65 points by halftime.
Golden State had scored only 58.
The Jazz were therefore in control of the game for the first 24 minutes.
Then the Warriors produced 42 points in the third quarter.
That was an 11-point advantage in one period.
The simplest way to understand the comeback is to compare the two teams’ offensive efficiency during that stretch.
Utah’s offense had been successful enough to create a seven-point halftime lead. But Golden State increased its scoring output at exactly the moment the game required a response.
Curry was the catalyst.
His 20-point third quarter forced Utah to react to a dramatically different offensive environment. Once Curry began hitting shots from outside, the Jazz had to account for him at greater distance.
That creates a secondary effect.
When defenders extend toward Curry, driving lanes and passing opportunities can open elsewhere.
Golden State’s supporting players then become more dangerous.
This is one reason Curry’s final 31-point total does not tell the entire story. His third-quarter scoring changed the geometry of the game.
Shooting Efficiency: Utah Was Better Overall, Golden State Was Better From Three
One of the most interesting elements of the utah jazz vs golden state warriors match player stats is the shooting comparison.
Utah made 45 of 86 field-goal attempts.
That equals roughly 52%.
Golden State made 43 of 87 attempts, or roughly 49%.
At first glance, that looks like an advantage for Utah.
But basketball scoring is not determined by field-goal percentage alone.
Golden State made 19 three-pointers on 45 attempts.
Utah made 13 three-pointers on 35 attempts.
That is a six-three-pointer advantage for Golden State.
The Warriors also made 18 free throws compared with 11 for Utah.
The difference becomes even clearer when considering total scoring from outside the paint and at the free-throw line.
Golden State’s 19 three-pointers accounted for 57 points.
Utah’s 13 three-pointers accounted for 39 points.
That is an 18-point advantage from made threes alone.
Golden State also had a seven-point advantage at the free-throw line.
Those numbers explain how the Warriors could shoot a lower overall field-goal percentage and still win by nine points.
Rebounding and Possession Control
Golden State won the rebounding battle 45-37.
That eight-rebound advantage matters because every extra rebound creates an opportunity to either extend a possession or end an opponent’s possession.
Golden State collected 13 offensive rebounds and 32 defensive rebounds.
Utah had 10 offensive rebounds and 27 defensive rebounds.
The Warriors therefore had an advantage on both sides of the glass.
Golden State also committed 14 turnovers compared with 15 for Utah.
The difference was small, but the Warriors gained nine steals compared with seven for the Jazz.
These numbers show that the game was not decided by one simple category.
Golden State won through a combination of:
- Three-point volume and accuracy
- Free-throw production
- Rebounding
- Defensive activity
- Second-half scoring
- Curry’s third-quarter explosion
Utah’s Offensive Success Still Deserves Attention
It would be inaccurate to describe the Jazz as having an ineffective offensive game.
They scored 114 points.
They shot 52% from the field.
They made 13 three-pointers.
They recorded 32 assists.
Markkanen scored 35.
George scored 22 and produced nine assists.
The bigger issue was maintaining that offensive effectiveness after Golden State changed the game’s rhythm.
Utah’s fourth-quarter output fell to 18 points.
That was its lowest-scoring quarter.
Meanwhile, Golden State scored 23.
The Warriors therefore won the final two quarters by a combined 16 points after entering halftime down seven.
This is a useful lesson when analyzing NBA game statistics: the final score can hide when the game was actually decided.
In this case, the game was essentially transformed during the third quarter.
Ball Movement Was Surprisingly Even
Both teams finished with 32 assists.
That is an important detail because it demonstrates that the Warriors did not win simply because they passed the ball better.
The difference was what happened after those possessions created scoring opportunities.
Golden State converted more of its high-value scoring chances.
Utah’s 32 assists were evidence of strong offensive connectivity. George’s nine assists, Collier’s seven and Love’s five gave Utah multiple playmaking sources.
Golden State had Butler with seven assists and Podziemski with eight, while Curry added five.
So the passing battle was essentially even.
The scoring efficiency battle was not.
Free-Throw Shooting Gave Golden State Another Edge
Golden State made 18 of 24 free throws.
That is 75%.
Utah made 11 of 17, or approximately 65%.
The difference was seven made free throws.
That is not enough by itself to explain the nine-point margin, but it contributed significantly.
Combined with the Warriors’ three-point advantage, it created a strong scoring foundation.
Utah’s 52% field-goal shooting was excellent, but Golden State’s superior conversion from the three-point line and free-throw line produced more points from the same basic possession structure.
Turnovers Were Close, But the Context Matters
Utah committed 15 turnovers.
Golden State committed 14.
That is a one-turnover difference.
However, the official game report noted that Golden State’s turnovers led to 22 Utah points, an area the Warriors would have wanted to improve.
This is a useful reminder that turnover totals alone do not always explain their impact.
A turnover can become especially costly when it creates a transition opportunity.
Utah scored 19 fast-break points according to the official game summary, compared with 10 for Golden State.
So even though Utah lost the game, it was capable of punishing Golden State when the Warriors gave the ball away.
The Most Important Individual Matchup
The headline matchup was naturally Stephen Curry against Lauri Markkanen.
Markkanen finished with 35 points.
Curry finished with 31.
On pure scoring volume, Markkanen won the individual comparison.
But Curry’s points arrived at a more decisive moment.
Markkanen’s 35 points helped Utah establish its halftime advantage.
Curry’s 20-point third quarter helped Golden State erase that advantage.
That difference is critical.
Individual statistics should be evaluated alongside game context. A player who scores heavily during a team’s strongest offensive stretch can have a different impact than a player who accumulates similar numbers while his team is losing control of the game.
This does not make Markkanen’s performance less impressive.
It makes Curry’s timing particularly important.
What Keyonte George’s Nine Assists Tell Us
George’s nine assists deserve special attention.
Twenty-two points and nine assists means he was directly involved in a large portion of Utah’s offensive creation.
The Jazz were able to generate 114 points despite losing the game.
That suggests the team’s offensive process was not fundamentally broken.
The bigger problem was defensive resistance.
When a team scores 114 points and still loses by nine, the investigation should move toward defensive execution, opponent efficiency and possession value rather than simply criticizing offensive production.
Golden State’s Bench and Secondary Scoring
Another reason the Warriors won was the number of useful contributions outside Curry.
Butler scored 15.
Post scored 15.
Melton scored 13.
Payton II scored 10.
Jackson-Davis scored nine.
Moody scored eight.
Richard scored eight.
Podziemski contributed six points alongside eight assists and six rebounds.
This distribution made Golden State harder to defend.
Utah could not simply build its defensive game plan around stopping Curry because too many other players were capable of converting opportunities.
That is an important team-level insight from the box score.
What the Stats Say About Utah
The Jazz’s numbers suggest a team capable of producing offense but vulnerable when the opponent creates a sustained scoring run.
The positive indicators included:
- 52% field-goal shooting
- 114 total points
- 32 assists
- 13 made three-pointers
- Markkanen’s 35 points
- George’s 22 points and nine assists
The negative indicators included:
- Eight fewer rebounds
- Four fewer made three-pointers
- Seven fewer made free throws
- A fourth-quarter scoring drop
- 15 turnovers
- Difficulty containing Golden State’s third-quarter attack
The overall profile is therefore more nuanced than simply saying Utah lost.
The Jazz demonstrated substantial offensive ability.
The Warriors demonstrated superior second-half control.
What the Stats Say About Golden State
Golden State’s profile was almost the opposite.
The Warriors shot only 49% from the field, lower than Utah.
Yet they won because they created more value through three-point shooting, free throws and rebounding.
Their 45 rebounds gave them an eight-board advantage.
Their 19 made threes gave them 57 points from behind the arc.
Their 18 made free throws added another 18 points.
Curry’s third-quarter performance then provided the momentum necessary to convert those advantages into a comeback.
Previous and Later Meetings
The January 4 matchup was part of a broader 2025-26 season series.
The previous meeting listed in the supplied data was a Warriors 134-117 victory on November 25, 2025.
The January meeting therefore gave Golden State a 2-0 season-series advantage at that stage.
The supplied schedule also lists another meeting on January 29, 2026, which Golden State won 140-124, followed by a March 10 meeting in which Utah won 119-116.
That later result is important when looking at the matchup as a season-long sample rather than a single game.
A single box score can tell us who performed on one night.
Multiple meetings can reveal whether the same matchup problems repeatedly appeared.
Why These Player Stats Matter
For fans, the value of detailed player statistics is obvious: they explain who actually influenced the game.
For analysts, the value goes further.
The numbers help separate:
- Scoring volume from scoring efficiency
- Individual production from team success
- First-half performance from second-half impact
- Raw rebounds from possession control
- Assists from overall offensive organization
- Three-point volume from overall field-goal percentage
That is why a serious game analysis should not stop with the top scorer.
The Warriors won because several statistical advantages worked together.
A Practical Way to Analyze Future NBA Matchups
If you are using game statistics to evaluate future matchups, a useful process is:
Step 1: Start With the Score by Quarter
Determine whether the game was close throughout or decided in one period.
Step 2: Identify High-Volume Scorers
Look at who took the most shots and whether those attempts were efficient.
Step 3: Separate Two-Point and Three-Point Production
A team can shoot better overall while losing the three-point battle badly.
Step 4: Check Free Throws
Free-throw attempts and conversion can create a hidden scoring advantage.
Step 5: Examine Rebounding
Offensive rebounds can generate additional possessions, while defensive rebounds prevent second chances.
Step 6: Look at Turnover Impact
Do not only count turnovers. Consider how many points they produced for the opponent.
Step 7: Study Timing
Ask when the leading scorers produced their points.
This final step is often overlooked.
Curry’s 20-point third quarter is a perfect example of why timing matters.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who led the Utah Jazz in scoring against the Warriors?
Lauri Markkanen led Utah with 35 points. He shot 15-for-27 from the field and added six rebounds.
Who led the Golden State Warriors in scoring?
Stephen Curry led Golden State with 31 points. He made six three-pointers and scored 20 points during the third quarter.
What was the final score of the Jazz vs Warriors game?
Golden State defeated Utah 123-114 at Chase Center in San Francisco.
How many points did Keyonte George score?
Keyonte George scored 22 points and added nine assists for Utah.
Which team shot better from the field?
Utah shot better overall, making 45 of 86 field-goal attempts for approximately 52%. Golden State made 43 of 87 for approximately 49%.
Which team made more three-pointers?
Golden State made 19 three-pointers, while Utah made 13. The Warriors therefore made six more threes.
Conclusion
The utah jazz vs golden state warriors match player stats from January 4, 2026 show why NBA games cannot be accurately understood from the final score or leading scorer alone.
Lauri Markkanen delivered Utah’s biggest scoring performance with 35 points, while Keyonte George added 22 points and nine assists. Utah also shot an impressive 52% from the field and produced 32 assists.
Golden State’s advantage came from a different combination of strengths.
Stephen Curry’s 31 points, including 20 in the third quarter, provided the defining individual performance. The Warriors also made 19 three-pointers, shot 75% from the free-throw line, won the rebounding battle 45-37 and received meaningful contributions from Jimmy Butler III, Quinten Post, De’Anthony Melton, Gary Payton II and others.
The most important statistical story was the third quarter. Utah entered halftime ahead 65-58, but Golden State responded with a 42-point third period. That single quarter changed the game’s direction and demonstrated the importance of timing, shot quality and star-level shot creation.
The utah jazz vs golden state warriors match player stats therefore reveal a competitive game in which Utah’s offensive efficiency was strong, but Golden State’s three-point production, rebounding and second-half execution ultimately produced the nine-point victory.
