Los Angeles Sparks vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats
The los angeles sparks vs indiana fever match player stats tell the story of a dominant Indiana Fever performance in a high-scoring WNBA regular season matchup played on June 28, 2026. Indiana secured a convincing 111 to 87 victory at Gainbridge Fieldhouse by combining efficient shooting, balanced scoring, strong rebounding, and excellent ball movement. While the final score highlights the difference between the two teams, the player statistics reveal exactly how Indiana controlled the game from the opening quarter and never allowed Los Angeles to build momentum.
From Kelsey Mitchell’s outstanding scoring display to Aliyah Boston’s all-around contribution and the Sparks’ struggle to defend the perimeter, this complete statistical analysis explains the biggest performances, key numbers, team comparisons, and what the result means for both franchises moving forward.
Match Overview
| Match Detail | Information |
| Competition | WNBA Regular Season |
| Match | Los Angeles Sparks vs Indiana Fever |
| Date | June 28, 2026 |
| Venue | Gainbridge Fieldhouse, Indianapolis, Indiana |
| Attendance | 16,018 |
| Final Score | Indiana Fever 111, Los Angeles Sparks 87 |
| Broadcast | CBS |
| Streaming | Paramount+ |
Indiana entered the game with an 11 to 8 record, while Los Angeles arrived at 8 to 10. The Fever used home-court advantage to produce one of their strongest offensive performances of the season.
Los Angeles Sparks vs Indiana Fever Match Player Stats Summary
The los angeles sparks vs indiana fever match player stats clearly show Indiana’s efficiency on both ends of the floor.
Final Team Statistics
| Category | Los Angeles Sparks | Indiana Fever |
| Points | 87 | 111 |
| Field Goals | 33 of 77 (43%) | 37 of 67 (55%) |
| Three Pointers | 4 of 20 (20%) | 10 of 19 (53%) |
| Free Throws | 17 of 21 (81%) | 27 of 33 (82%) |
| Total Rebounds | 25 | 41 |
| Assists | 21 | 23 |
| Turnovers | 9 | 12 |
| Steals | 4 | 6 |
| Blocks | 4 | 6 |
The numbers explain the outcome immediately.
Indiana shot significantly better from both the field and beyond the three-point line while also controlling the rebounding battle by 16 boards.
Quarter by Quarter Breakdown
| Quarter | Los Angeles | Indiana |
| First | 21 | 27 |
| Second | 16 | 30 |
| Third | 21 | 32 |
| Fourth | 29 | 22 |
| Final | 87 | 111 |
First Quarter
Indiana established an early rhythm with efficient shooting and entered the second quarter holding a six-point advantage.
Second Quarter
This proved to be the turning point. The Fever outscored Los Angeles 30 to 16, stretching the lead into double digits through excellent transition offense and accurate perimeter shooting.
Third Quarter
Indiana continued attacking aggressively, scoring another 32 points and effectively putting the contest out of reach.
Fourth Quarter
Los Angeles improved offensively, but Indiana had already built a comfortable lead and managed the game effectively until the final buzzer.
Indiana Fever Player Statistics
Indiana featured balanced production throughout the lineup.
| Player | Points |
| Kelsey Mitchell | 26 |
| Aliyah Boston | 17 |
| Tyasha Harris | 16 |
| Monique Billings | 15 |
Kelsey Mitchell
Mitchell finished with 26 points, making her the game’s leading scorer.
Her offensive performance stood out because she consistently found quality scoring opportunities, attacked the basket, and stretched the defense with perimeter shooting. She remained efficient throughout the game and was the biggest offensive difference-maker.
Aliyah Boston
Boston contributed 17 points while also helping Indiana dominate the rebounding battle.
Her presence inside forced Los Angeles to commit extra defensive attention, creating additional scoring opportunities for teammates.
Tyasha Harris
Harris added 16 points and played an important role in Indiana’s offensive flow.
She consistently moved the ball, attacked gaps in the defense, and provided valuable scoring support behind Mitchell.
Monique Billings
Billings contributed 15 points, giving Indiana another reliable interior scoring option.
Her physical play around the basket helped the Fever maintain offensive pressure throughout the game.
Los Angeles Sparks Player Statistics
Although the Sparks lost by 24 points, several players delivered respectable individual performances.
| Player | Points |
| Nneka Ogwumike | 17 |
| Dearica Hamby | 15 |
| Ariel Atkins | 12 |
| Rae Burrell | 11 |
Nneka Ogwumike
Ogwumike led Los Angeles with 17 points.
She remained productive despite facing consistent defensive pressure and continued competing throughout the game.
Dearica Hamby
Hamby scored 15 points, providing energy in transition and around the basket.
Ariel Atkins
Atkins added 12 points, but Indiana limited her perimeter opportunities for much of the evening.
Rae Burrell
Burrell finished with 11 points, contributing useful minutes off the offensive attack.
Shooting Efficiency Comparison
One of the biggest reasons for Indiana’s victory was shooting efficiency.
Field Goal Percentage
- Indiana: 55%
- Los Angeles: 43%
A 12 percent difference in field goal accuracy created a major scoring advantage.
Three Point Shooting
Indiana converted:
- 10 of 19
- 53%
Los Angeles converted:
- 4 of 20
- 20%
This represents one of the largest statistical gaps in the game.
Indiana outscored Los Angeles by 18 points from three-point range alone.
Free Throw Shooting
Both teams performed similarly.
- Indiana: 82%
- Los Angeles: 81%
Free throws were not the deciding factor.
Rebounding Battle
Indiana dominated the glass.
| Team | Total Rebounds |
| Indiana | 41 |
| Los Angeles | 25 |
Winning the rebounding battle by sixteen rebounds allowed Indiana to generate additional possessions while limiting second-chance opportunities for Los Angeles.
This advantage influenced nearly every phase of the contest.
Ball Movement and Team Play
Indiana recorded 23 assists, reflecting excellent offensive chemistry.
The Fever consistently created open looks through:
- Quick passing
- Strong spacing
- Effective ball movement
- Interior and perimeter balance
Los Angeles also recorded 21 assists, showing that the offense moved the ball reasonably well, but lower shooting efficiency prevented those possessions from becoming points.
Turnover Analysis
Interestingly, Indiana committed more turnovers.
| Team | Turnovers |
| Indiana | 12 |
| Los Angeles | 9 |
Normally this would favor Los Angeles.
However, Indiana’s outstanding shooting percentage completely offset those extra mistakes.
This serves as a reminder that turnovers matter, but efficient scoring can often outweigh a small turnover disadvantage.
Defensive Impact
Indiana also led the defensive categories.
| Category | Indiana | Los Angeles |
| Steals | 6 | 4 |
| Blocks | 6 | 4 |
The Fever protected the rim effectively while generating additional defensive stops throughout the game.
Injury Report
Several important players were unavailable.
Los Angeles Sparks
- Cameron Brink (Left Ankle)
- Kelsey Plum (Left Leg Injury)
Missing both players reduced the Sparks’ overall scoring depth and defensive versatility.
Indiana Fever
- Caitlin Clark (Back)
Even without Caitlin Clark, Indiana produced one of its strongest offensive performances of the season, highlighting the team’s balanced roster and depth.
Season Series Results
The two teams split competitive contests throughout the season.
| Game | Winner |
| May 14, 2026 | Los Angeles Sparks 87, Indiana Fever 78 |
| June 28, 2026 | Indiana Fever 111, Los Angeles Sparks 87 |
| July 9, 2026 | Los Angeles Sparks 106, Indiana Fever 92 |
Although Indiana delivered the most dominant single-game victory, the season series remained competitive with both teams demonstrating the ability to win convincingly.
Biggest Reasons Indiana Won
Several statistical advantages combined to produce the final result.
Elite Shooting
Indiana converted 55 percent of its field goals while shooting an exceptional 53 percent from three-point range.
Rebounding Dominance
A plus-16 rebounding margin provided additional possessions and reduced second-chance opportunities for Los Angeles.
Balanced Scoring
Four Indiana players scored at least 15 points, making the offense difficult to defend.
Fast Offensive Pace
The Fever maintained offensive pressure throughout the first three quarters, scoring:
- 27 points
- 30 points
- 32 points
This consistency prevented the Sparks from closing the gap.
What the Statistics Reveal
Looking beyond the final score, several important observations emerge.
Indiana did not rely on a single superstar performance. Instead, multiple players contributed efficiently, creating a balanced offensive attack.
The Fever also demonstrated that they can remain highly productive even without Caitlin Clark in the lineup. The team’s spacing, passing, and scoring depth allowed them to maintain offensive efficiency against a competitive opponent.
For Los Angeles, the statistics highlight areas requiring improvement. Better three-point shooting, stronger rebounding, and improved interior defense would have significantly reduced Indiana’s offensive advantage.
Key Takeaways
The statistical profile of this game highlights several lessons.
- Efficient shooting often outweighs a slight turnover disadvantage.
- Winning the rebounding battle creates valuable extra possessions.
- Balanced scoring makes defensive adjustments much more difficult.
- Strong three-point accuracy can completely change the outcome of a game.
- Team basketball remains one of the most reliable paths to consistent success.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points in the game?
Kelsey Mitchell led all players with 26 points for the Indiana Fever.
What was the final score?
Indiana Fever defeated the Los Angeles Sparks 111 to 87.
Who led the Sparks in scoring?
Nneka Ogwumike finished as Los Angeles’ leading scorer with 17 points.
Which team shot better from three-point range?
Indiana shot 53 percent from three compared to Los Angeles’ 20 percent.
Who won the rebounding battle?
Indiana controlled the boards with 41 rebounds, while Los Angeles collected 25.
Which injured players missed the game?
Los Angeles played without Cameron Brink and Kelsey Plum, while Indiana was without Caitlin Clark.
Conclusion
The los angeles sparks vs indiana fever match player stats highlight one of Indiana’s most complete team performances of the 2026 WNBA regular season. Superior shooting efficiency, dominant rebounding, balanced scoring, and consistent execution allowed the Fever to build a large lead before halftime and maintain control throughout the contest.
Kelsey Mitchell’s 26-point performance led the offense, while strong contributions from Aliyah Boston, Tyasha Harris, and Monique Billings demonstrated the depth that made Indiana difficult to defend. On the opposite side, Nneka Ogwumike and Dearica Hamby fought hard for Los Angeles, but the Sparks were unable to overcome Indiana’s outstanding offensive efficiency and rebounding advantage.
For analysts, fans, and anyone studying team performance, this matchup serves as an excellent example of how shooting accuracy, rebounding, and balanced scoring can determine the outcome of a professional basketball game.
