Las Vegas Raiders vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats
The Las Vegas Raiders vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats from December 14, 2025, tell a much clearer story than the final score alone. Philadelphia dominated the Raiders 31-0, combining efficient passing, steady rushing, strong red-zone execution, and a disruptive defensive performance. Jalen Hurts completed 12 of 15 passes for 175 yards and three touchdowns without an interception, while Saquon Barkley added 78 rushing yards and a touchdown on 22 carries. Dallas Goedert was especially productive, catching six passes for 70 yards and two touchdowns. For Las Vegas, Kenny Pickett completed 15 of 25 passes for only 64 yards, threw one interception, and was sacked four times. Ashton Jeanty led the Raiders on the ground with 35 yards on nine carries, while Brock Bowers caught six passes for 28 yards.
The numbers reveal an important difference between the two teams. Philadelphia did not simply win because it created one or two big plays. The Eagles controlled multiple phases of the game. They produced 204 passing yards, 183 rushing yards, three passing touchdowns, and one rushing touchdown. Las Vegas finished with just 64 passing yards and 46 rushing yards. That 118-yard difference in total offense was accompanied by four Eagles sacks and an interception from Zack Baun.
This makes the game particularly useful for anyone studying individual production, team efficiency, offensive balance, defensive pressure, and the relationship between player statistics and the final result.
Las Vegas Raiders vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The game took place on December 14, 2025, with Philadelphia entering the matchup at 8-5 and Las Vegas at 2-11 based on the supplied game data. After the result, the Eagles moved to 9-5, while the Raiders dropped to 2-12.
The final score was:
Philadelphia Eagles 31, Las Vegas Raiders 0
A shutout immediately suggests defensive dominance, but the underlying numbers make the result even more convincing.
| Category | Las Vegas Raiders | Philadelphia Eagles |
| Final Score | 0 | 31 |
| Passing Yards | 64 | 204 |
| Passing TDs | 0 | 3 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 0 |
| Rushing Yards | 46 | 183 |
| Rushing Attempts | 13 | 47 |
| Rushing TDs | 0 | 1 |
| Receiving Yards | 64 | 208 |
| Receptions | 15 | 15 |
| Sacks | 1 | 4 |
| Team Tackles | 84 | 48 |
One of the most striking figures is the rushing disparity. Philadelphia ran the ball 47 times for 183 yards, while Las Vegas had only 13 rushing attempts for 46 yards.
That difference matters because rushing production is not only about yards. A productive running game can help control the clock, create manageable down and distance situations, support the quarterback, and keep the opposing defense from attacking every passing situation aggressively.
Philadelphia achieved that balance.
Jalen Hurts Delivered the Most Efficient Passing Performance
Jalen Hurts was the central figure in Philadelphia’s passing attack.
His statistical line was:
- 12 completions
- 15 attempts
- 175 passing yards
- 3 touchdowns
- 0 interceptions
That works out to an impressive 80 percent completion rate.
More importantly, Hurts did not need a large number of attempts to make a major impact. He averaged approximately 11.7 yards per completion and 11.7 passing yards per attempt.
His three touchdown passes accounted for nearly all of Philadelphia’s passing touchdowns in the game because the Eagles finished with three passing touchdowns overall.
This is an excellent example of why completion percentage by itself does not tell the entire story. A quarterback can complete a high percentage of short throws without generating much offensive value. Hurts combined accuracy with significant yardage production.
The absence of an interception is also important.
Philadelphia finished with zero turnovers through the passing game, while Las Vegas threw one interception. When one team is already producing more yards and also protects the football better, the margin for the opposing team becomes extremely small.
Hurts Compared With Kenny Pickett
The quarterback comparison was heavily tilted toward Philadelphia.
| Statistic | Jalen Hurts | Kenny Pickett |
| Completions | 12 | 15 |
| Attempts | 15 | 25 |
| Completion Rate | 80.0% | 60.0% |
| Passing Yards | 175 | 64 |
| Passing TDs | 3 | 0 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 1 |
| Sacks | Not specified in supplied individual line | 4 |
| Yards per Attempt | 11.7 | 2.6 |
Interestingly, Pickett completed more passes than Hurts, but that statistic was misleading without the surrounding numbers.
Pickett completed 15 passes compared with Hurts’ 12, yet Philadelphia gained 111 more passing yards.
That is a powerful reminder that completion totals should always be evaluated alongside attempts, yards, touchdowns, turnovers, and offensive context.
Kenny Pickett Faced a Difficult Afternoon
Kenny Pickett’s 15-for-25 performance produced 64 yards, no touchdowns, and one interception.
His completion rate was 60 percent, but his average gain was only 2.6 yards per attempt.
That number is particularly revealing.
A quarterback averaging 2.6 yards per attempt has very little opportunity to sustain drives unless the offense compensates through a strong rushing attack, explosive plays, defensive turnovers, or exceptional third-down efficiency.
The Raiders did not have that compensation.
Their rushing attack produced only 46 yards. They did not score a touchdown. They threw an interception. Pickett was also sacked four times for 35 yards.
The result was an offense that struggled to create sustained forward progress.
What the Sack Numbers Tell Us
Philadelphia recorded four sacks for 35 yards.
Las Vegas recorded one sack for four yards.
The sack difference was not enormous in raw count, but its effect was significant because Philadelphia was already limiting the Raiders’ passing production.
Four sacks meant additional lost yardage, disrupted passing situations, and fewer opportunities for Las Vegas to develop offensive rhythm.
The Raiders’ one sack against Hurts showed that Philadelphia’s quarterback was considerably less affected by the opposing pass rush.
Saquon Barkley Powered the Eagles’ Ground Game
Saquon Barkley was Philadelphia’s leading rusher with:
- 22 carries
- 78 yards
- 1 touchdown
His average was approximately 3.5 yards per carry.
At first glance, 3.5 yards per carry may not appear spectacular. However, rushing efficiency should not be interpreted in isolation.
Barkley carried the ball 22 times, which gave Philadelphia a reliable workload and helped establish a physical offensive identity. The Eagles as a team finished with 183 rushing yards on 47 attempts, an average of approximately 3.9 yards per carry.
The larger story is therefore the volume and balance.
Philadelphia did not need Barkley to produce a touchdown on every long run. The Eagles consistently returned to the running game while also finding success through Hurts and the passing attack.
Ashton Jeanty’s Production for Las Vegas
Ashton Jeanty led the Raiders’ rushing statistics:
- 9 carries
- 35 yards
- 3.9 yards per carry
His average was almost identical to Philadelphia’s team rushing average.
The major difference was volume.
Jeanty received only nine carries, and Las Vegas had just 13 rushing attempts as a team.
That meant the Raiders never established the same ground-game presence that Philadelphia did.
When an offense has only 13 rushing attempts, it becomes much easier for the defense to anticipate passing situations. That can create a difficult cycle: limited rushing success leads to more obvious passing situations, which allows the defense to increase pressure, which then makes sustaining drives even harder.
Dallas Goedert Was the Eagles’ Most Productive Receiver
Dallas Goedert produced one of the game’s strongest individual receiving performances.
He recorded:
- 6 receptions
- 70 yards
- 2 touchdowns
Goedert accounted for two of Philadelphia’s three passing touchdowns.
His six receptions were also tied for the most receptions by any player listed in the supplied statistics.
The performance demonstrates how valuable a tight end can become when an offense successfully mixes formations and creates favorable matchups.
Goedert’s 70 yards represented roughly one-third of Philadelphia’s 208 receiving yards.
That is a substantial share of the team’s receiving production.
Brock Bowers Led the Raiders in Receptions
Brock Bowers also finished with six receptions, matching Goedert’s reception total.
However, the yardage difference was dramatic.
Bowers:
- 6 receptions
- 28 yards
- 4.7 yards per reception
Goedert:
- 6 receptions
- 70 yards
- 11.7 yards per reception
Both players caught the same number of passes, but Goedert generated 42 more receiving yards.
That comparison highlights one of the most important lessons from these player statistics: reception totals alone cannot explain offensive effectiveness.
Bowers was involved in the passing game, but Las Vegas struggled to turn those completions into substantial yardage.
Las Vegas Raiders vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats: Receiving Comparison
The team receiving numbers further demonstrate the difference between the offenses.
Philadelphia recorded 15 receptions for 208 yards and three touchdowns.
Las Vegas recorded 15 receptions for 64 yards and zero touchdowns.
The reception totals were exactly the same.
The production was not.
Philadelphia averaged approximately 13.9 yards per reception, while Las Vegas averaged approximately 4.3 yards per reception.
That is an enormous efficiency gap.
| Receiving Category | Raiders | Eagles |
| Receptions | 15 | 15 |
| Receiving Yards | 64 | 208 |
| Touchdowns | 0 | 3 |
| Yards per Reception | 4.3 | 13.9 |
This is one of the clearest statistical explanations for the 31-0 result.
The Eagles were not simply completing more passes. They were generating substantially more yardage from the same number of receptions.
Philadelphia’s Offensive Balance Was the Defining Factor
Philadelphia finished with:
- 204 passing yards
- 183 rushing yards
- 387 total offensive yards
The Raiders finished with:
- 64 passing yards
- 46 rushing yards
- 110 total offensive yards
That means Philadelphia produced 277 more total yards.
The difference is enormous.
Philadelphia generated almost 3.5 times as many total yards as Las Vegas.
This balance is especially notable because the Eagles did not rely exclusively on one offensive method.
They could move the ball through the air.
They could move the ball on the ground.
And they converted that production into touchdowns.
Las Vegas struggled in both major offensive categories.
Defensive Statistics Explain Why the Raiders Were Shut Out
Offensive numbers tell only half the story.
Philadelphia’s defense recorded four sacks and one interception.
Zack Baun was credited with the Eagles’ interception.
The Raiders recorded one sack.
Neither team recorded a fumble, according to the supplied game data.
The Eagles therefore created five significant negative or possession-changing defensive plays through sacks and an interception without giving up a turnover through a fumble.
That combination helped keep the Raiders from generating scoring opportunities.
Zack Baun’s Interception
Zack Baun’s interception was the only interception recorded in the game.
That play mattered because turnovers can dramatically change expected scoring opportunities.
The Raiders had already struggled to move the football. Giving Philadelphia an additional possession through an interception further reduced their ability to stay competitive.
A shutout does not always require a defense to force several turnovers. Philadelphia demonstrated that pressure, coverage, and field-position control can be enough to produce a dominant result.
Team Tackles Need to Be Interpreted Carefully
The Raiders were credited with 84 total tackles, including 44 solo tackles.
Philadelphia recorded 48 total tackles, including 24 solo tackles.
At first glance, the Raiders having 36 more tackles might seem surprising given the 31-0 defeat.
But tackle totals are not automatically indicators of defensive quality.
A defense that spends a large amount of time on the field can accumulate many tackles simply because the opposing offense runs more plays and completes more possessions.
In this game, the higher Raiders tackle total should therefore not be interpreted as evidence that Las Vegas controlled the game defensively.
Philadelphia’s lower tackle total existed alongside a 31-0 win, four sacks, and a defensive interception.
Context matters.
Special Teams Production
Special teams also played a role in the overall statistical picture.
Jake Elliott handled Philadelphia’s kicking duties and finished with:
- 1 field goal made on 1 attempt
- 27-yard field goal
- 4 extra points made
- 7 total points
Britain Covey returned three punts for 22 yards.
Will Shipley recorded one kickoff return for 31 yards.
For Las Vegas, Dylan Laube returned four kickoffs for 99 yards, while Raheem Mostert had one kickoff return for 18 yards.
AJ Cole punted five times for 223 yards, averaging 44.6 yards per punt.
Philadelphia’s Braden Mann punted once for 43 yards.
The Raiders therefore had substantially more punting volume, which is consistent with an offense that struggled to sustain drives.
Field Position and Offensive Rhythm
Punting five times is not automatically a negative. Teams punt strategically in many situations.
However, when five punts occur alongside 64 passing yards, 46 rushing yards, no touchdowns, and an interception, they become part of a larger pattern.
The Raiders struggled to maintain offensive momentum.
Philadelphia, by contrast, needed only one punt in the supplied statistics.
That contrast provides useful context for understanding possession quality.
The Eagles were repeatedly able to keep drives productive enough to avoid frequent fourth-down failures or punts.
The Raiders repeatedly found themselves unable to generate enough offensive progress.
Las Vegas Raiders vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats: What the Numbers Really Mean
The most useful way to study this game is not to isolate individual statistics.
Instead, connect them.
Hurts produced 175 passing yards and three touchdowns.
Goedert caught six passes for 70 yards and two touchdowns.
Barkley carried 22 times for 78 yards and one touchdown.
Philadelphia’s offense generated 204 passing yards and 183 rushing yards.
At the same time, the Eagles’ defense held Las Vegas to 64 passing yards and 46 rushing yards.
This creates a complete statistical picture.
The Eagles were productive with the ball and restrictive without it.
The Raiders had difficulty in both directions.
That is why the final score was so decisive.
Why Completion Percentage Can Be Misleading
One of the most interesting comparisons from the game is quarterback completion percentage.
Hurts completed 80 percent of his passes.
Pickett completed 60 percent.
That difference is meaningful, but the yardage gap tells an even bigger story.
Hurts averaged 11.7 yards per attempt.
Pickett averaged only 2.6.
Therefore, the Eagles’ passing attack was both more accurate and more productive on a per-attempt basis.
This distinction is useful when evaluating quarterback performance in any game.
A quarterback who completes 70 percent of passes may still produce a poor offensive performance if most completions occur behind the line of scrimmage or for very short gains.
Conversely, a quarterback with fewer completions can still produce an excellent game if those completions consistently create first downs and touchdowns.
Why Rushing Volume Matters
Philadelphia ran 47 times.
Las Vegas ran 13 times.
That 34-attempt difference is enormous.
The Eagles had opportunities to establish their running game and control the pace.
The Raiders did not.
Barkley’s 22 carries represented nearly half of Philadelphia’s rushing attempts. Jeanty’s nine carries represented the majority of Las Vegas’ nine listed individual carries, with the team totaling 13 attempts.
The difference suggests that Philadelphia had the luxury of remaining committed to its offensive plan, while Las Vegas struggled to create enough overall offense to maintain balance.
A Closer Look at Offensive Efficiency
Philadelphia’s offensive efficiency can be summarized through several simple calculations.
The Eagles produced 387 total yards.
The Raiders produced 110.
Philadelphia gained 277 more yards.
The Eagles also produced four total touchdowns, including three passing touchdowns and one rushing touchdown.
Las Vegas produced zero touchdowns.
The difference in touchdowns is even more important than the yardage difference.
Yards create opportunities.
Touchdowns convert those opportunities into points.
Philadelphia did both.
The Importance of Turnover Margin
The turnover picture was simple.
Philadelphia recorded one interception.
Las Vegas recorded none.
The Eagles did not lose a fumble, and the Raiders also recorded no fumbles.
Therefore, Philadelphia won the turnover margin through the interception.
A single turnover is not enough by itself to explain a 31-0 result, but in a low-output offense such as the Raiders’ attack in this matchup, an interception can be especially damaging.
When an offense is already struggling to produce yards, losing a possession can have an outsized effect.
Player Production Versus Team Production
A common mistake when reading game statistics is assuming that the best individual statistical performance always determines the outcome.
Football is different.
Hurts was excellent, but his performance depended on protection, receiving options, blocking, and rushing support.
Barkley was productive, but his performance was part of a larger 183-yard rushing effort.
Goedert was a major receiving threat, but his touchdowns were made possible by the Eagles’ overall offensive execution.
On defense, Baun’s interception was important, but Philadelphia’s four sacks and overall defensive performance involved the entire unit.
The same principle applies to Las Vegas.
Bowers caught six passes, and Jeanty averaged 3.9 yards per carry, but those individual numbers could not overcome the Raiders’ limited team production.
Las Vegas Raiders vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways
Several conclusions stand out from the numbers.
1. Philadelphia won on both sides of the ball
The Eagles generated 387 total yards while holding Las Vegas to 110.
That is the foundation of the victory.
2. Hurts was extremely efficient
His 12-for-15 passing line produced 175 yards and three touchdowns with no interceptions.
3. Goedert converted opportunities into points
Six receptions produced 70 yards and two touchdowns.
4. Barkley provided rushing volume
His 22 carries helped Philadelphia maintain a balanced offensive attack.
5. The Raiders’ passing game struggled
Pickett’s 64 yards from 25 attempts shows how difficult it was for Las Vegas to generate meaningful passing production.
6. Philadelphia’s pass rush created pressure
Four sacks for 35 yards contributed to the Raiders’ offensive problems.
7. The Raiders lacked offensive balance
Only 13 rushing attempts and 46 rushing yards made it difficult to complement the passing game.
8. Equal receptions did not mean equal receiving production
Both teams had 15 receptions, but Philadelphia gained 208 receiving yards compared with 64 for Las Vegas.
What Fans Can Learn From the Individual Player Numbers
For fans analyzing a box score, this game provides a useful framework.
Start with the quarterback.
Then examine rushing volume.
After that, compare receiving efficiency.
Finally, evaluate sacks, turnovers, and team yardage.
This approach prevents one statistic from dominating the analysis.
For example, looking only at receptions would make the teams appear identical because each recorded 15.
Looking only at total tackles could even make the Raiders appear more active defensively.
But once the statistics are connected, the actual story becomes obvious.
Philadelphia produced more explosive and efficient offense while preventing Las Vegas from developing any consistent scoring threat.
How to Evaluate a Player’s Performance From a Box Score
A useful five-step approach is:
- Check opportunity. Look at attempts, carries, and targets.
- Check efficiency. Calculate yards per attempt, carry, or reception.
- Check scoring impact. Identify touchdowns and field goals.
- Check mistakes. Look for interceptions, fumbles, and sacks.
- Compare individual production with team performance.
This method provides much more context than simply searching for the player with the most yards.
For this matchup, it explains why Goedert’s six receptions were more impactful than Bowers’ six receptions, and why Hurts’ 12 completions were more productive than Pickett’s 15.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the best player in the Raiders vs Eagles game?
Jalen Hurts was one of the most influential players in the game. He completed 12 of 15 passes for 175 yards and three touchdowns without an interception. Saquon Barkley and Dallas Goedert also played major roles.
What were Jalen Hurts’ stats against the Raiders?
Hurts completed 12 of 15 passes for 175 yards, three touchdowns, and zero interceptions.
How did Kenny Pickett perform against Philadelphia?
Pickett completed 15 of 25 passes for 64 yards, no touchdowns, and one interception. He was also sacked four times for 35 yards.
Who led the Eagles in rushing?
Saquon Barkley led Philadelphia with 22 carries for 78 yards and one touchdown.
Who led the Eagles in receiving?
Dallas Goedert led the Eagles with six receptions for 70 yards and two touchdowns.
What was the final score of Raiders vs Eagles?
Philadelphia defeated Las Vegas 31-0 on December 14, 2025.
Conclusion
The Las Vegas Raiders vs Philadelphia Eagles Match Player Stats provide a detailed explanation for Philadelphia’s 31-0 victory. The Eagles were more effective in virtually every major statistical category that directly influences scoring.
Jalen Hurts completed 80 percent of his passes and threw three touchdowns without an interception. Saquon Barkley supplied 22 rushing attempts and a touchdown, while Dallas Goedert turned six receptions into 70 yards and two scores.
The team numbers reinforce those individual performances. Philadelphia accumulated 204 passing yards and 183 rushing yards for 387 total yards. Las Vegas managed only 64 passing yards and 46 rushing yards for 110 total yards.
Defensively, Philadelphia recorded four sacks and Zack Baun’s interception. The Raiders managed one sack and could not force a turnover. The receiving comparison was equally revealing, with both teams recording 15 receptions but Philadelphia gaining 208 yards compared with only 64 for Las Vegas.
The biggest lesson from this matchup is that a box score becomes much more useful when individual statistics are connected to team efficiency. Completion totals, receptions, tackles, and rushing averages all need context. In this game, that context clearly shows a Philadelphia team that controlled offensive production, protected the football, generated defensive pressure, and converted opportunities into points.
