Philadelphia Eagles vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats

Philadelphia Eagles vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats from the January 4, 2026 matchup tell a clear story about how Washington overcame Philadelphia 24-17 despite entering the game with a 5-12 record against an Eagles team that finished 11-6. The final score was decided by a strong fourth quarter from Washington, which produced 14 unanswered points after Philadelphia had taken a 17-10 lead through three quarters.

The game is particularly interesting when the individual numbers are examined rather than the final score alone. Philadelphia produced more passing yards and completed more passes, while Washington generated a stronger rushing output and made the most of key defensive and turnover moments. The quarterback statistics, rushing production, receiving numbers, defensive totals, kicking performance, and quarter-by-quarter scoring all help explain why the Commanders won.

This detailed breakdown examines the player statistics from the game and explains what the numbers reveal about the performance of both teams.

Philadelphia Eagles vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats

The Philadelphia Eagles entered the matchup with an 11-6 record, including a 5-3 home record. Washington entered at 5-12 overall and 3-6 on the road. On paper, Philadelphia had the stronger season record, but the individual statistics from this game show that Washington was able to compete in several important areas.

The final result was:

Washington Commanders 24, Philadelphia Eagles 17

The scoring progression was also important:

Quarter	Washington	Philadelphia
1st	0	0
2nd	10	7
3rd	0	10
4th	14	0
Final	24	17

The fourth quarter was the decisive period. Philadelphia had a seven-point advantage entering the final quarter, but Washington scored 14 points while holding the Eagles scoreless.

That fourth-quarter swing is one of the most important facts to remember when evaluating the game.

Game Overview and Statistical Context

The matchup produced an unusual contrast between offensive volume and actual scoreboard success.

Philadelphia’s passing game generated:

• 21 completions
• 40 passing attempts
• 241 passing yards
• 1 touchdown
• 1 interception
• 3 sacks allowed
• 68.9 passer rating
• 22.2 QBR

Washington’s passing production was smaller:

• 14 completions
• 22 passing attempts
• 131 passing yards
• 1 touchdown
• 1 interception
• 0 sacks
• 76.1 passer rating
• 88.8 QBR

Philadelphia therefore produced considerably more passing yardage, but that advantage did not translate into a win.

Washington also had the stronger rushing production.

The Commanders recorded 41 rushing attempts for 143 yards and two touchdowns. Philadelphia ran 19 times for 80 yards and one touchdown.

That difference is significant because Washington finished with 63 more rushing yards despite attempting 22 more rushing plays.

The statistics suggest that Washington’s offense relied more heavily on the ground game, while Philadelphia placed a much greater share of its offensive workload on the passing game.

This creates an important lesson when reading an NFL box score: the team with the larger passing total does not automatically control the game. Offensive balance, scoring efficiency, defensive pressure, and situational execution can matter more than raw yardage.

Josh Johnson’s Performance for Washington

Josh Johnson completed 14 of 22 passes for 131 yards, with one touchdown and one interception.

His average gain was listed at 6.0 yards per attempt. He was not sacked during the game.

His statistical line was:

Statistic	Josh Johnson
Completions	14
Attempts	22
Completion percentage	63.6%
Passing yards	131
Average	6.0
Touchdowns	1
Interceptions	1
Sacks	0
QBR	88.8
Passer rating	76.1

Johnson did not produce a high-volume passing performance, but Washington did not require one.

His 22 attempts represented a relatively small passing workload compared with Philadelphia’s 40 attempts. Washington’s ability to run the football 41 times reduced the need for Johnson to carry the offense through the air.

The absence of a sack is also notable. Philadelphia recorded no sacks despite producing four quarterback hits. Washington’s passing attack therefore avoided the negative plays associated with quarterback sacks.

The interception prevented Johnson’s performance from being considered completely clean, but the overall passing numbers were enough to support a winning offensive performance.

Johnson’s Efficiency Compared With Volume

One of the biggest differences between the quarterbacks was volume.

Tanner McKee attempted 18 more passes than Johnson and produced 110 more passing yards. Yet Philadelphia still lost.

That does not mean passing volume was the reason Philadelphia lost. Instead, it shows that production has to be evaluated alongside the rest of the offense.

Washington’s 143 rushing yards and two rushing touchdowns allowed Johnson to operate within a more run-heavy offensive structure.

His job was not necessarily to throw for 300 yards. The statistical evidence shows that Washington won while asking its quarterback to throw less frequently than Philadelphia’s quarterback.

Tanner McKee’s Numbers for Philadelphia

Tanner McKee completed 21 of 40 passes for 241 yards, one touchdown, and one interception.

His statistical line was:

Statistic	Tanner McKee
Completions	21
Attempts	40
Completion percentage	52.5%
Passing yards	241
Average	6.0
Touchdowns	1
Interceptions	1
Sacks	3
QBR	22.2
Passer rating	68.9

McKee’s 241 passing yards were the highest individual passing total listed in the game.

However, his completion percentage was 52.5%, meaning Philadelphia needed 40 attempts to produce those 241 yards.

The three sacks are another important part of the story. Washington’s defense recorded three sacks, while Philadelphia did not record any.

This created a clear defensive advantage for Washington in quarterback pressure.

The 22.2 QBR listed for McKee was substantially below Johnson’s 88.8 QBR. The passer rating difference was smaller, with McKee at 68.9 and Johnson at 76.1, but both measurements favored Washington’s quarterback in this particular game.

What McKee’s Numbers Tell Us

McKee’s statistics demonstrate the difference between accumulating yards and converting offensive production into a winning result.

Philadelphia’s quarterback threw for 241 yards, 110 more than Washington’s quarterback. The Eagles also completed seven more passes.

Yet Philadelphia scored only 17 points.

That is the key context.

Passing yardage alone cannot explain the result. Philadelphia needed to convert its offensive opportunities into points while avoiding negative plays and turnovers. Washington ultimately did a better job of turning its overall offensive performance into a 24-point total.

Washington’s Rushing Attack

The Commanders ran the ball 41 times for 143 yards.

Their average was 3.5 yards per rushing attempt, and they scored two rushing touchdowns. Their longest run was 13 yards.

The team rushing line was:

Statistic	Washington
Attempts	41
Yards	143
Average	3.5
Touchdowns	2
Longest run	13 yards

The most important feature is the workload.

Washington attempted more than twice as many rushing plays as Philadelphia.

That allowed the Commanders to establish a different offensive rhythm. Rather than relying heavily on the quarterback, Washington distributed a large amount of its offensive workload through the running game.

Chris Rodriguez Jr. Leads Washington’s Rushers

Chris Rodriguez Jr. was Washington’s leading rusher.

He recorded:

• 16 carries
• 65 yards
• 4.1 yards per carry
• 1 touchdown
• 12-yard longest run

Rodriguez accounted for a substantial portion of Washington’s rushing workload.

His 65 yards represented roughly 45% of the team’s 143 rushing yards. He also averaged more yards per carry than Washington’s overall rushing average.

The touchdown was particularly valuable because rushing scores directly contributed to Washington’s 24-point total.

Rodriguez’s performance illustrates why individual rushing efficiency should be considered alongside workload. A player carrying the ball 16 times for 65 yards is providing consistent volume even without producing a huge breakaway run.

Philadelphia’s Rushing Performance

Philadelphia recorded 19 rushing attempts for 80 yards.

The Eagles averaged 4.2 yards per carry and scored one rushing touchdown. Their longest run was 13 yards.

Statistic	Philadelphia
Attempts	19
Yards	80
Average	4.2
Touchdowns	1
Longest run	13 yards

Philadelphia actually averaged 0.7 yards more per rushing attempt than Washington.

That is an important detail.

If the analysis focused only on efficiency, Philadelphia would appear to have the better rushing performance. But Washington had 22 more rushing attempts, which gave the Commanders 63 more total rushing yards.

This is a good example of why both efficiency and volume matter.

Tank Bigsby’s Contribution

Tank Bigsby was Philadelphia’s leading rusher.

He recorded:

• 16 carries
• 75 yards
• 4.7 yards per carry
• 1 touchdown
• 13-yard longest run

Bigsby accounted for nearly all of Philadelphia’s rushing production.

His 75 yards represented 93.8% of the Eagles’ 80 rushing yards. That makes his role particularly significant.

He also averaged 4.7 yards per carry, which was the strongest rushing average among the leading rushers identified in the supplied statistics.

Despite that production, Philadelphia did not maintain enough rushing volume to match Washington’s ground-game workload.

Comparing the Two Ground Games

The rushing comparison provides one of the clearest statistical contrasts in the game.

Category	Washington	Philadelphia
Rushing attempts	41	19
Rushing yards	143	80
Yards per carry	3.5	4.2
Rushing TDs	2	1
Longest run	13	13

Philadelphia was more efficient per attempt, but Washington had much more volume.

Washington’s 41 attempts also helped create 22 more rushing opportunities than Philadelphia.

That difference matters because rushing plays can help control offensive tempo, create short-yardage opportunities, and reduce reliance on passing.

The numbers do not prove that rushing volume alone caused Washington’s victory. They do show that the Commanders adopted a much more run-heavy approach and received enough production from it to complement their passing game.

Washington Receiving Statistics

Washington recorded 14 receptions for 131 yards.

The team averaged 9.4 yards per reception and produced one receiving touchdown. The longest reception was 25 yards.

Statistic	Washington
Receptions	14
Receiving yards	131
Average	9.4
Touchdowns	1
Longest reception	25 yards

Terry McLaurin was the leading receiver.

He finished with:

• 4 receptions
• 57 yards
• 14.3 yards per reception
• 0 touchdowns
• 25-yard longest reception

McLaurin’s 57 yards represented about 43.5% of Washington’s receiving yardage.

His 14.3-yard average per reception was significantly higher than the team’s 9.4-yard average.

Although he did not score a touchdown, his four receptions gave Washington an important source of receiving production.

The 25-yard reception was also the longest Washington completion recorded in the supplied team statistics.

Philadelphia Receiving Statistics

Philadelphia completed 21 passes, and those completions produced 241 receiving yards.

The Eagles averaged 11.5 yards per reception and recorded one receiving touchdown. Their longest reception was 31 yards.

Statistic	Philadelphia
Receptions	21
Receiving yards	241
Average	11.5
Touchdowns	1
Longest reception	31 yards

DeVonta Smith was Philadelphia’s leading receiver.

He recorded:

• 3 receptions
• 52 yards
• 17.3 yards per reception
• 0 touchdowns
• 27-yard longest reception

Smith’s 17.3 yards per reception was higher than Philadelphia’s team average of 11.5.

However, three receptions is a relatively small number of catches for the team’s leading receiver in a game where the quarterback attempted 40 passes.

This is another example of why the box score should be read as a collection of connected numbers rather than isolated statistics.

Philadelphia generated 241 passing yards, but its leading receiver had only 52 yards.

Receiving Comparison: Philadelphia Had the Volume Advantage

The receiving numbers clearly favored Philadelphia in total production.

Category	Washington	Philadelphia
Receptions	14	21
Receiving yards	131	241
Yards per reception	9.4	11.5
Receiving TDs	1	1
Longest reception	25	31

Philadelphia produced 110 more receiving yards.

That is a large difference.

Yet the Eagles did not win.

This is one of the strongest reminders from the game that yardage totals do not always correspond directly with the final score.

Washington compensated for its receiving disadvantage through greater rushing volume and two rushing touchdowns.

Philadelphia, meanwhile, had more passing production but also faced three sacks and finished with one interception.

Defensive Player Stats and Turnovers

The defensive statistics add another layer to the matchup.

Washington recorded:

• 55 total tackles
• 33 solo tackles
• 3 sacks
• 3 tackles for loss
• 3 passes defended
• 6 quarterback hits

Philadelphia recorded:

• 76 total tackles
• 33 solo tackles
• 0 sacks
• 2 tackles for loss
• 5 passes defended
• 4 quarterback hits

Philadelphia recorded more total tackles, but Washington generated the stronger quarterback-pressure numbers.

The three sacks are especially important because Philadelphia recorded none.

Washington’s Defensive Pressure

Washington’s six quarterback hits and three sacks indicate that its defense was able to create pressure on McKee.

The Eagles had four quarterback hits but no sacks.

That distinction matters because sacks can end drives, reduce field position, and create long-yardage situations.

Washington also recorded three tackles for loss compared with Philadelphia’s two.

The defensive statistics therefore show that Washington’s advantage was not simply a matter of offensive production.

The Commanders also generated more direct negative plays against the opposing quarterback.

Interceptions and Defensive Playmaking

Both teams recorded one interception.

Washington’s interception came from Jeremy Reaves.

His statistical contribution included:

• 1 interception
• 28 interception return yards
• 0 interception return touchdowns

Philadelphia’s interception came from Jalyx Hunt.

His line included:

• 1 interception
• 0 return yards
• 0 interception return touchdowns

The interception totals were therefore equal.

Neither team turned an interception into a defensive touchdown.

That makes the distinction between the two turnovers less dramatic in the scoring column, but interceptions still represent major changes in possession.

The supplied statistics also show a fumble difference.

Washington recorded three fumbles, losing one, while Philadelphia recorded zero fumbles and recovered one.

So Washington did not have a clean turnover profile despite winning the game.

This is important because it prevents an oversimplified conclusion that Washington simply won because Philadelphia committed more turnovers. The supplied numbers do not support that explanation.

Fumble Statistics

The fumble totals were:

Category	Washington	Philadelphia
Fumbles	3	0
Fumbles lost	1	0
Fumbles recovered	2	1

Washington had more fumbles and lost one.

Philadelphia had no fumbles listed and still lost.

Again, the broader lesson is that the result came from several statistical areas working together rather than from one simple advantage.

Special Teams Statistics

Special teams also contributed to the overall statistical picture.

Kick Returns

Washington’s Treylon Burks recorded one kick return for 22 yards.

Philadelphia’s Will Shipley had two kick returns for 55 yards, averaging 27.5 yards per return. His longest return was 29 yards.

Player	Returns	Yards	Average	Long
Treylon Burks	1	22	22.0	22
Will Shipley	2	55	27.5	29

Philadelphia had the stronger kick-return production in the supplied statistics.

Punt Returns

Washington’s River Cracraft recorded one punt return for one yard.

Philadelphia’s Britain Covey recorded two punt returns for 20 yards, averaging 10.0 yards per return. His longest return was 12 yards.

This again gives Philadelphia an advantage in return production.

However, those special teams numbers did not overcome Washington’s advantages in other areas.

Kicking Performance

Washington’s Jake Moody attempted two field goals and made one.

His longest successful field goal was 56 yards.

He also made all three extra-point attempts.

His total scoring contribution was six points.

Philadelphia’s Jake Elliott attempted one field goal and made it.

His successful kick was 39 yards, and he converted both extra-point attempts.

His total scoring contribution was five points.

Kicker	FG	FG %	Long	XP	Points
Jake Moody	1/2	50.0%	56	3/3	6
Jake Elliott	1/1	100%	39	2/2	5

Moody’s missed field goal means Washington left some potential points on the field.

Elliott was perfect on his field-goal attempt and extra points.

Despite that, Washington still finished with the higher score.

Punting Comparison

Washington’s Tress Way punted three times for 159 yards.

His average was 53.0 yards per punt, with a 71-yard long and one punt inside the 20-yard line.

Philadelphia’s Braden Mann also punted three times.

He recorded 115 total yards, averaging 38.3 yards per punt. His longest was 44 yards, and one punt was placed inside the 20.

Statistic	Tress Way	Braden Mann
Punts	3	3
Total yards	159	115
Average	53.0	38.3
Inside 20	1	1
Long	71	44

Way had a significant advantage in raw punting distance.

His 53.0-yard average was 14.7 yards higher than Mann’s 38.3-yard average.

While punting does not directly appear in the final score, field position is one of the reasons special teams statistics can be useful when analyzing a close game.

Quarter-by-Quarter Breakdown

The scoring pattern is perhaps the most revealing part of the game.

First Quarter: Scoreless

Both teams finished the opening quarter without scoring.

The 0-0 start meant neither offense gained an early scoreboard advantage.

Second Quarter: Washington Takes a 10-7 Lead

Washington scored 10 points in the second quarter, while Philadelphia scored seven.

At halftime, the Commanders held a 10-7 advantage.

The seven-point difference was small, but it gave Washington the first meaningful lead of the game.

Third Quarter: Philadelphia Takes Control

Philadelphia responded strongly in the third quarter.

The Eagles scored 10 points while Washington scored none.

That turned the halftime deficit into a 17-10 Philadelphia lead entering the fourth quarter.

At that stage, Philadelphia appeared to have control of the scoreboard.

Fourth Quarter: Washington’s Decisive Response

Washington scored 14 points in the fourth quarter.

Philadelphia scored zero.

That produced the final 24-17 result.

The fourth-quarter scoring differential was therefore:

Washington +14

Philadelphia 0

This was the decisive statistical event of the game.

Why Philadelphia’s 241 Passing Yards Did Not Produce a Win

At first glance, Philadelphia’s passing production might suggest that the Eagles should have won.

They had:

• 110 more passing yards
• 7 more completions
• 110 more receiving yards
• Better rushing efficiency per attempt
• More total tackles
• Better kick-return production
• Better field-goal accuracy

Yet Washington won.

The explanation becomes clearer when the statistics are considered together.

Washington had:

• 143 rushing yards compared with 80
• Two rushing touchdowns compared with one
• Three sacks compared with zero
• Six quarterback hits compared with four
• A 14-point fourth quarter
• A seven-point final winning margin

Philadelphia also attempted 40 passes compared with Washington’s 22.

That means Philadelphia’s offense was significantly more pass-heavy.

The Eagles generated more passing yardage, but Washington produced a more balanced statistical profile.

A Closer Look at Offensive Balance

Washington’s offense produced 274 yards when combining its listed passing and rushing totals:

131 passing + 143 rushing = 274 yards

Philadelphia produced 321 yards:

241 passing + 80 rushing = 321 yards

Philadelphia therefore produced 47 more combined passing and rushing yards.

Yet Washington scored seven more points.

That is an important statistical finding.

It shows that Washington gained less total yardage but produced more points.

In simple terms, the Commanders were more efficient at converting their available offensive production into the final scoreboard result.

This is why a box score should never be reduced to the question, “Which team had more yards?”

The more useful questions are:

1. How were the yards distributed?
2. How many touchdowns resulted?
3. Which team controlled the ground game?
4. Which defense generated pressure?
5. When did the scoring happen?
6. Which team executed better in the decisive period?

For this game, those questions provide a much better explanation than total yardage alone.

What the Player Stats Reveal About Each Team

Washington Commanders

Washington’s statistical identity in this game was built around balance and late-game scoring.

The Commanders did not dominate the passing game. They did not lead in total yardage. They did not avoid every turnover.

Instead, they combined:

• Heavy rushing volume
• Two rushing touchdowns
• Efficient enough quarterback play
• Three sacks
• Six quarterback hits
• A strong fourth quarter
• 24 total points

Chris Rodriguez Jr. was the leading rusher, while Terry McLaurin led the receiving group.

Josh Johnson provided enough passing production to complement the running game.

Defensively, Washington’s ability to sack McKee three times was a notable advantage.

Philadelphia Eagles

Philadelphia’s statistical profile was more pass-oriented.

The Eagles produced 241 passing yards and 21 completions.

Tanner McKee threw 40 passes, while DeVonta Smith led the receiving group with 52 yards.

Tank Bigsby was highly efficient as the primary rusher, producing 75 yards on 16 carries.

However, Philadelphia’s 19 rushing attempts were far below Washington’s 41.

The Eagles also failed to record a sack despite generating four quarterback hits.

The biggest issue visible in the statistics was not a lack of offensive yardage. It was the inability to turn that production into enough points, particularly after halftime and especially in the fourth quarter.

Most Important Player Performances

Several players stand out when the statistics are ranked by impact.

1. Chris Rodriguez Jr.

Rodriguez led Washington in rushing with 65 yards and one touchdown on 16 carries.

His 4.1-yard average was above Washington’s overall 3.5-yard rushing average.

2. Tank Bigsby

Bigsby produced 75 yards and a touchdown on 16 carries.

His 4.7-yard average was the strongest among the leading rushing performances listed.

3. Tanner McKee

McKee produced the game’s highest passing yardage total with 241 yards.

However, he completed only 52.5% of his attempts, threw one interception, and was sacked three times.

4. Josh Johnson

Johnson completed 63.6% of his passes for 131 yards, one touchdown, and one interception.

He was not sacked and operated behind a much heavier rushing workload.

5. Terry McLaurin

McLaurin led Washington’s receivers with 57 yards on four receptions.

His 14.3-yard average and 25-yard longest reception provided Washington with its strongest listed receiving contribution.

6. DeVonta Smith

Smith led Philadelphia’s receivers with 52 yards on three receptions.

His 17.3-yard average was the highest receiving average among the two teams’ leading receivers listed in the supplied data.

The Biggest Statistical Lessons From the Game

The numbers support several broader lessons for anyone analyzing NFL player statistics.

Total Yardage Does Not Decide the Winner

Philadelphia produced 321 combined passing and rushing yards, compared with Washington’s 274.

Washington still won 24-17.

Efficiency and Volume Are Different

Philadelphia averaged 4.2 yards per rushing attempt.

Washington averaged 3.5.

But Washington ran 41 times compared with Philadelphia’s 19.

The Commanders therefore finished with more rushing yards and more rushing touchdowns.

Passing Volume Can Be Misleading

McKee attempted 40 passes.

Johnson attempted 22.

McKee threw for 110 more yards.

But Washington scored seven more points.

More passing attempts and passing yards do not automatically indicate a better offensive performance.

Defensive Pressure Matters

Washington recorded three sacks.

Philadelphia recorded zero.

That difference is meaningful because sacks are negative plays that can disrupt offensive drives.

The Fourth Quarter Can Change the Entire Game

Philadelphia led 17-10 after three quarters.

Washington scored 14 points in the fourth quarter.

Philadelphia scored none.

The final result was therefore determined by a dramatic fourth-quarter turnaround.

How to Read Philadelphia Eagles vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats

When evaluating this matchup or any NFL box score, it is useful to follow a consistent process.

Step 1: Start With the Final Score

Washington won 24-17.

This establishes the outcome but does not explain it.

Step 2: Check Quarter Scoring

The quarter totals show that Washington won the fourth quarter 14-0.

That immediately identifies the decisive period.

Step 3: Compare Quarterback Workloads

McKee attempted 40 passes.

Johnson attempted 22.

This reveals a major difference in offensive approach.

Step 4: Examine the Rushing Game

Washington ran 41 times for 143 yards.

Philadelphia ran 19 times for 80.

The difference in rushing volume becomes obvious.

Step 5: Look at Touchdowns

Washington scored two rushing touchdowns and one passing touchdown.

Philadelphia scored one rushing touchdown and one passing touchdown.

That gives Washington three offensive touchdowns compared with Philadelphia’s two.

Step 6: Check Defensive Pressure

Washington recorded three sacks.

Philadelphia recorded none.

That is a major defensive distinction.

Step 7: Review Turnovers

Both teams recorded one interception.

Washington also had three fumbles and lost one, while Philadelphia had no fumbles listed.

This prevents an inaccurate conclusion that one team dominated the turnover battle.

Step 8: Review Special Teams

Washington had the stronger punting average, while Philadelphia had stronger return numbers and perfect field-goal accuracy on its lone attempt.

The complete box score is more informative than any single category.

Statistical Comparison Table

For readers who want the essential numbers in one place, this comparison provides a quick reference.

Category	Washington Commanders	Philadelphia Eagles
Final score	24	17
Record	5-12	11-6
Passing yards	131	241
Passing attempts	22	40
Completions	14	21
Passing TDs	1	1
Interceptions thrown	1	1
Sacks allowed	0	3
Rushing attempts	41	19
Rushing yards	143	80
Rushing TDs	2	1
Receptions	14	21
Receiving yards	131	241
Receiving TDs	1	1
Total tackles	55	76
Sacks	3	0
QB hits	6	4
Passes defended	3	5
Interceptions	1	1
Field goals	1/2	1/1
Extra points	3/3	2/2

This table makes the central contrast easy to see.

Philadelphia had stronger passing production, more total tackles, more return yardage, and better field-goal accuracy.

Washington had more rushing production, more rushing touchdowns, more sacks, and a decisive fourth quarter.

The latter group of advantages was enough to produce the win.

What Makes These Stats Useful for Future Analysis?

Player statistics become more valuable when they are used to identify patterns rather than simply copied from a box score.

For example, a fantasy football researcher might care most about:

• Passing attempts
• Passing touchdowns
• Rushing attempts
• Rushing touchdowns
• Receiving volume
• Receiving yards

A coaching analyst may focus more on:

• Rushing efficiency
• Sacks
• Quarterback hits
• Third-down tendencies
• Turnovers
• Red-zone production

A casual fan may simply want to know which players performed best.

This game provides useful information for all three perspectives.

The most important principle is to match the statistic to the question being asked.

If the question is “Who threw for more yards?” the answer is clearly Tanner McKee.

If the question is “Who ran the ball more effectively by average?” Tank Bigsby had the stronger listed average among the leading rushers.

If the question is “Which team generated more rushing production?” Washington did.

If the question is “Which defense created more quarterback pressure?” Washington did.

If the question is “Who won?” Washington did, 24-17.

Each question produces a different statistical answer.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who won the Eagles vs Commanders game on January 4, 2026?

The Washington Commanders defeated the Philadelphia Eagles 24-17.

Who was the leading passer in the game?

Philadelphia quarterback Tanner McKee led in passing yards with 241 yards on 21 completions from 40 attempts. He threw one touchdown and one interception.

Who was Washington’s leading rusher?

Chris Rodriguez Jr. led Washington with 16 carries for 65 yards and one rushing touchdown.

Who was Philadelphia’s leading rusher?

Tank Bigsby led Philadelphia with 16 carries for 75 yards and one touchdown.

Who had the most receiving yards?

Tanner McKee’s Philadelphia passing attack produced 241 receiving yards as a team. Terry McLaurin led Washington’s individual receivers with 57 yards, while DeVonta Smith led Philadelphia’s listed receivers with 52 yards.

Which team had more rushing yards?

Washington had more rushing yards, finishing with 143 compared with Philadelphia’s 80. The Commanders also had 41 rushing attempts compared with the Eagles’ 19.

Conclusion

The Philadelphia Eagles vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats from January 4, 2026 show why the final score cannot be explained by passing yards alone.

Philadelphia produced 241 passing yards and 80 rushing yards, giving the Eagles more combined passing and rushing yardage than Washington. Tanner McKee also threw for 110 more yards than Josh Johnson.

Washington nevertheless found the areas that mattered most to the final result.

The Commanders ran the football 41 times for 143 yards and two touchdowns. Chris Rodriguez Jr. led that rushing attack with 65 yards and a touchdown, while Josh Johnson contributed 131 passing yards and a passing touchdown.

Defensively, Washington recorded three sacks and six quarterback hits while Philadelphia recorded no sacks. That pressure difference was another important part of the matchup.

The most decisive statistic, however, was the fourth-quarter scoring. Philadelphia led 17-10 after three quarters, but Washington scored 14 points in the final quarter and shut Philadelphia out.

The result was a 24-17 Washington victory.

For anyone studying Philadelphia Eagles vs Washington Commanders Match Player Stats, the central lesson is that NFL games are rarely explained by one statistical category. Passing production, rushing volume, scoring efficiency, defensive pressure, turnovers, special teams, and quarter-by-quarter execution all have to be considered together.

The January 4 matchup is a strong example of that principle. Philadelphia produced more total offensive yardage, but Washington produced the combination of rushing touchdowns, defensive pressure, and fourth-quarter scoring necessary to turn its statistical profile into a victory.