49ers vs Texans Match Player Stats
The 49ers vs texans match player stats from the October 26, 2025 meeting tell a clear story about how Houston turned a balanced offensive performance into a 26-15 victory over San Francisco. The Texans finished with 318 passing yards and 157 rushing yards, while the 49ers produced 193 passing yards and only 48 rushing yards. The final score was Houston Texans 26, San Francisco 49ers 15, and the individual numbers help explain why the game developed the way it did.
This was not simply a game decided by one quarterback or one spectacular play. Houston controlled several important statistical areas, particularly offensive volume, rushing production, third-down style efficiency reflected through sustained possession, field-goal production, and pressure on the San Francisco passing game.
For anyone researching the 49ers vs texans match player stats, the most useful approach is to look beyond the final score. The box score shows where each team generated production, which players carried the workload, and how the individual performances contributed to the overall result.
49ers vs Texans Match Player Stats at a Glance
The game ended with Houston winning 26-15.
| Category | San Francisco 49ers | Houston Texans |
| Final Score | 15 | 26 |
| Passing Yards | 193 | 318 |
| Rushing Yards | 48 | 157 |
| Total Offensive Yards | 241 | 475 |
| Passing Completions | 19 | 30 |
| Passing Attempts | 32 | 39 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 2 | 2 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 1 | 1 |
| Team Rushing Attempts | 10 | 36 |
| Defensive Sacks | 0 | 2 |
| Field Goals Made | 0 | 4 |
| Extra Points Made | 1 | 2 |
The most striking difference is total offensive production. Houston generated 475 yards compared with 241 for San Francisco. That 234-yard advantage gave the Texans considerably more opportunities to sustain drives and create scoring chances.
Houston also had a major advantage on the ground. The Texans rushed 36 times for 157 yards, while San Francisco recorded just 10 team carries for 48 yards.
That imbalance matters because rushing volume can affect the entire structure of a game. A team that can consistently run the football has more opportunities to control tempo, keep its defense off the field, and create manageable situations for its quarterback.
Quarterback Comparison
C.J. Stroud’s 318-Yard Passing Performance
C.J. Stroud delivered one of the strongest statistical performances of the game for Houston.
He completed 30 of 39 passes for 318 yards, averaging 8.2 yards per attempt. He threw two touchdowns and one interception. His listed QBR was 90.3, while his passer rating was 106.6.
Those numbers show why Houston was able to move the ball consistently through the air.
Stroud completed 76.9 percent of his attempts, calculated from 30 completions on 39 passes. More importantly, the passing game was not limited to short checkdowns. Houston’s receivers combined for several substantial gains, including a 50-yard reception by Woody Marks and a 44-yard catch by Jaylin Noel.
Stroud also avoided being sacked. The supplied statistics show 0 sacks and 0 sack yards against him.
That is an important part of the quarterback story. Passing production is much easier to maintain when the quarterback has enough time to operate without losing yardage on sacks.
Mac Jones and the San Francisco Passing Game
Mac Jones completed 19 of 32 passes for 193 yards, averaging 6.0 yards per attempt.
He threw two touchdowns and one interception. His listed QBR was 78.0, with a passer rating of 84.5. He was also credited with two sacks for 18 yards.
Jones’ completion rate was 59.4 percent, compared with 76.9 percent for Stroud.
The difference in passing efficiency was significant. San Francisco needed 32 attempts to produce 193 yards, while Houston generated 318 yards on 39 attempts.
Jones did make contributions outside the passing game. He rushed twice for 23 yards, including a 13-yard run. That gave him an impressive 11.5-yard rushing average on those two attempts.
However, the overall San Francisco offense struggled to establish a consistent rushing foundation.
The Biggest Statistical Difference: Rushing Production
The rushing numbers are among the most important parts of the game.
Houston:
- 36 carries
- 157 rushing yards
- 4.4 yards per carry
- 0 rushing touchdowns
San Francisco:
- 10 carries
- 48 rushing yards
- 4.8 yards per carry
- 0 rushing touchdowns
At first glance, San Francisco’s 4.8 yards per carry appears better than Houston’s 4.4. But the much larger issue is volume.
Houston ran the ball 36 times. San Francisco ran it only 10 times.
That created a major difference in offensive balance.
Houston did not need every rushing attempt to be highly productive because the Texans consistently returned to the ground game. That volume helped them accumulate 157 rushing yards.
San Francisco, meanwhile, had only 10 team rushing attempts.
Woody Marks Leads Houston’s Rushing Attack
Woody Marks carried the ball 11 times for 62 yards, averaging 5.6 yards per carry. His longest run covered 23 yards.
Marks also contributed in the passing game with four receptions for 49 yards. His longest reception was 50 yards.
That made him one of Houston’s most productive all-around offensive contributors.
His combined rushing and receiving production demonstrates why looking only at rushing statistics can miss an important part of a running back’s impact.
Nick Chubb Adds 56 Rushing Yards
Nick Chubb received 17 carries and gained 56 yards.
His average was 3.3 yards per carry, with a longest run of nine yards.
While the average was not particularly high, the workload was important. Chubb accounted for the largest number of Houston rushing attempts, with 17 carries.
A running back does not have to produce a huge average on every carry to influence a game. Repeated carries can help maintain offensive balance and force a defense to respect the running game.
Christian McCaffrey’s Limited Rushing Output
Christian McCaffrey carried eight times for 25 yards.
He averaged 3.1 yards per carry, with a longest run of nine yards.
His rushing production was therefore modest compared with his normal importance as a multidimensional offensive player.
McCaffrey did contribute as a receiver, catching three passes for 43 yards. His longest reception went for 27 yards.
His combined rushing and receiving totals were more useful than his rushing numbers alone, but San Francisco still lacked the overall rushing volume that Houston established.
Receiving Statistics Breakdown
The receiving numbers provide another clear contrast between the teams.
San Francisco’s receiving production totaled 193 yards on 19 receptions and 31 targets.
Houston’s receiving production totaled 318 yards on 30 receptions and 38 targets.
Houston therefore produced 11 more receptions and 125 more receiving yards.
Xavier Hutchinson Leads Houston Receivers
Xavier Hutchinson was Houston’s leading receiver by yardage.
He caught five passes for 69 yards and one touchdown on six targets.
His average was 13.8 yards per reception, and his longest catch covered 30 yards.
Hutchinson’s touchdown was particularly important because Houston received scoring production from multiple areas rather than depending on one receiver.
Jaylin Noel Provides Explosive Yardage
Jaylin Noel caught five passes for 63 yards.
His average was 12.6 yards per reception, and his longest reception was 44 yards.
That 44-yard play stands out in the receiving statistics because it represented a major chunk of Houston’s passing production on a single completion.
Noel also returned two punts for 11 yards.
Jayden Higgins Scores a Receiving Touchdown
Jayden Higgins caught four passes for 34 yards and one touchdown on eight targets.
His longest reception was 12 yards.
Although his yardage total was lower than Hutchinson’s and Noel’s, the touchdown gave him a direct role in Houston’s scoring production.
San Francisco’s Receiving Leaders
Jauan Jennings led San Francisco in receiving yardage.
He recorded four receptions for 45 yards on seven targets, averaging 11.3 yards per reception. His longest reception covered 25 yards.
Kendrick Bourne added three receptions for 44 yards on four targets. He averaged 14.7 yards per reception and had an 18-yard long.
George Kittle caught four passes for 43 yards and one touchdown on five targets.
Kittle’s touchdown was especially notable because it gave San Francisco one of its two passing touchdowns.
Christian McCaffrey added three catches for 43 yards on six targets.
The receiving workload was therefore distributed across several San Francisco players rather than concentrated in one dominant performer.
George Kittle’s Touchdown Contribution
George Kittle finished with four receptions for 43 yards and one touchdown.
His 10.8-yard average per reception was solid, and he was targeted five times.
The touchdown gave San Francisco an important scoring contribution from its tight end position.
However, Kittle’s performance was not enough to offset Houston’s overall offensive production.
San Francisco’s receiving unit collectively recorded 19 receptions for 193 yards. Houston reached 30 receptions for 318 yards.
The difference in total receiving output was therefore substantial.
Defensive Player Stats
The defensive numbers reveal another important difference.
San Francisco recorded:
- 91 total tackles
- 46 solo tackles
- 0 sacks
- 3 tackles for loss
- 2 passes defended
- 2 quarterback hits
- 1 interception
Houston recorded:
- 45 total tackles
- 26 solo tackles
- 2 sacks
- 4 tackles for loss
- 5 passes defended
- 6 quarterback hits
- 1 interception
San Francisco had more recorded tackles, but that does not necessarily indicate superior defensive performance.
The number of tackles can rise when a defense spends a large amount of time on the field and allows more offensive plays to develop.
Houston’s defense recorded more quarterback hits, more passes defended, and two sacks.
That pressure helped limit San Francisco’s passing efficiency.
Deommodore Lenoir Records an Interception
Deommodore Lenoir recorded San Francisco’s interception.
He returned it 26 yards and did not score.
That turnover represented an important defensive play for the 49ers, but San Francisco was unable to turn its defensive takeaway into enough overall offensive production to close the scoring gap.
Kamari Lassiter Intercepts Mac Jones
Houston’s Kamari Lassiter recorded one interception.
He had zero return yards.
The takeaway gave Houston an important defensive contribution in a game where the Texans also recorded two sacks and six quarterback hits.
Turnovers and Ball Security
Each team threw one interception.
San Francisco’s Mac Jones threw one interception, while Houston’s C.J. Stroud also threw one.
San Francisco also recorded one team fumble, although it was not lost.
Mykel Williams recorded a fumble recovery for the 49ers.
Houston was listed with no fumbles.
Therefore, the turnover statistics were relatively balanced in terms of interceptions, but Houston avoided the additional fumble issue.
The final game result was not driven by a massive turnover differential. Instead, the larger statistical story was offensive production.
Special Teams Production
Special teams also contributed to the final scoring difference.
Houston’s Kicking Advantage
Ka’imi Fairbairn made all four of his field-goal attempts.
He made kicks from the field without a recorded miss and had a longest field goal of 37 yards.
He also made both extra-point attempts.
Fairbairn finished with 14 points.
That is a major contribution in a game Houston won by 11 points.
San Francisco’s Eddy Pineiro attempted no field goals and made one extra point, finishing with one point.
The difference was therefore 13 points in kicker scoring alone.
This is one of the clearest examples of why a box-score analysis should not focus exclusively on quarterback and skill-position statistics.
Punting
San Francisco’s Thomas Morstead punted five times for 238 yards.
His average was 47.6 yards per punt, with three punts landing inside the 20-yard line. His longest punt traveled 54 yards.
Houston’s Tommy Townsend punted twice for 96 yards.
His average was 48.0 yards, with one punt inside the 20-yard line and a longest punt of 53 yards.
The similar punting averages show that the biggest special teams difference was not punting distance. It was Houston’s field-goal production.
Kick Return and Punt Return Numbers
San Francisco received strong kick-return production from Brian Robinson Jr.
He returned three kicks for 99 yards, averaging 33.0 yards per return. His longest return was 46 yards.
Skyy Moore added two returns for 52 yards, averaging 26.0 yards per return.
Houston’s Dameon Pierce returned three kicks for 70 yards, averaging 23.3 yards per return, with a longest return of 26 yards.
On punt returns, Houston’s Jaylin Noel recorded two returns for 11 yards.
San Francisco had no punt returns listed.
These numbers show that San Francisco had some positive special teams field-position contributions, particularly from Robinson Jr., even though Houston ultimately produced more points.
Why Houston Scored 26 Points
Houston’s scoring total can be understood through three main statistical factors.
1. Efficient Passing Production
Stroud completed 30 of 39 passes for 318 yards and two touchdowns.
That provided a strong foundation for the offense.
2. Consistent Rushing Volume
The Texans ran 36 times for 157 yards.
Even though the average was 4.4 yards per carry, the sustained workload gave Houston a reliable second dimension.
3. Four Made Field Goals
Fairbairn converted all four field-goal attempts.
That produced 12 points from field goals alone, followed by two extra points.
The ability to convert scoring opportunities into points was a major part of the final 26-point total.
Why San Francisco Finished With 15 Points
San Francisco produced two passing touchdowns but did not generate a rushing touchdown.
Mac Jones threw for 193 yards and two touchdowns.
George Kittle accounted for one receiving touchdown.
The supplied team statistics also list two total passing touchdowns for San Francisco.
However, the 49ers struggled to maintain the same level of offensive volume as Houston.
The biggest numerical issue was the 241-to-475 difference in total offense.
San Francisco also had only 48 rushing yards.
Without a stronger ground contribution, the offense placed more responsibility on the passing game.
Total Offense Tells the Story
The most important statistical comparison may be total yardage.
Houston:
475 total yards
San Francisco:
241 total yards
That is a difference of 234 yards.
Houston gained almost twice as much total offense as San Francisco.
The Texans produced 318 passing yards and 157 rushing yards.
The 49ers produced 193 passing yards and 48 rushing yards.
The difference in rushing yards was 109.
The difference in passing yards was 125.
That means Houston’s advantage was not isolated to one part of the offense. The Texans outproduced San Francisco both through the air and on the ground.
Efficiency Versus Volume
One interesting detail in the box score is that San Francisco’s team rushing average was actually higher.
San Francisco averaged 4.8 yards per carry.
Houston averaged 4.4 yards per carry.
Yet Houston had the better rushing output by a wide margin.
Why?
Because Houston ran the ball 36 times compared with 10 San Francisco attempts.
This is an important lesson when interpreting football statistics.
Averages can tell you how efficiently a team performed on individual attempts. Volume tells you how often the team created those opportunities.
Both numbers matter.
A 4.8-yard average over 10 attempts produces 48 yards.
A 4.4-yard average over 36 attempts produces 158.4 yards mathematically, which is very close to Houston’s listed 157-yard total because individual player and team statistics are subject to the exact accounting of the box score.
The practical takeaway is that Houston’s commitment to the rushing game created substantially more production.
The Importance of Offensive Balance
Houston’s offensive balance was one of the defining features of the game.
The Texans recorded:
- 318 passing yards
- 157 rushing yards
- 475 total yards
San Francisco recorded:
- 193 passing yards
- 48 rushing yards
- 241 total yards
Houston’s offense therefore generated production from both phases.
That makes a defense prepare for more possibilities.
If a team can throw for more than 300 yards while also rushing for more than 150, defenders cannot focus exclusively on stopping one dimension.
San Francisco did not have the same statistical balance.
A Closer Look at the Target Distribution
Houston’s 38 passing targets were distributed among several players.
Hutchinson received six targets.
Noel received six.
Woody Marks received four.
Braxton Berrios received five.
Jayden Higgins received eight.
That distribution indicates that Houston was able to involve multiple receiving options.
San Francisco’s 31 targets were also distributed across several players.
Jennings received seven.
Bourne received four.
Kittle received five.
McCaffrey received six.
The difference was therefore not necessarily about one team having a single receiver dominate the entire game.
Instead, Houston’s passing attack generated more completions and significantly more total yards.
Explosive Plays That Changed the Statistical Picture
Several long gains stand out.
For Houston:
- Woody Marks had a 50-yard reception.
- Jaylin Noel had a 44-yard reception.
- Hutchinson had a 30-yard reception.
- Marks had a 23-yard rushing attempt.
For San Francisco:
- McCaffrey had a 27-yard reception.
- Jennings had a 25-yard reception.
- Bourne had an 18-yard reception.
- Kittle had a 17-yard reception.
Houston’s longest passing play was therefore substantially longer than San Francisco’s.
The Texans’ ability to generate explosive plays helped explain the 125-yard advantage in passing production.
What the Player Stats Reveal About Each Offense
The 49ers vs texans match player stats reveal two very different offensive profiles.
San Francisco relied heavily on the passing game because its rushing volume was limited.
Houston used a more balanced attack, combining 39 pass attempts with 36 rushing attempts.
The Texans also got significant contributions from their running backs as receivers.
Woody Marks is the clearest example. He produced 62 rushing yards and 49 receiving yards, giving him 111 yards from scrimmage based on the listed statistics.
That kind of dual-threat contribution can create matchup problems because a player can remain involved regardless of whether the offense is running or passing.
What the Defensive Stats Reveal
Houston’s defense recorded two sacks and six quarterback hits.
San Francisco recorded zero sacks and two quarterback hits.
That difference matters because quarterback pressure can affect offensive efficiency even when it does not produce a turnover.
Houston also defended five passes compared with two for San Francisco.
The Texans therefore showed greater statistical disruption against the opposing passing game.
San Francisco did record one interception, matching Houston’s total, but the overall pressure numbers favored Houston.
A Statistical Summary of the Key Players
Houston Texans
C.J. Stroud: 30/39, 318 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT, 106.6 rating
Woody Marks: 11 carries, 62 yards; 4 receptions, 49 yards
Nick Chubb: 17 carries, 56 yards
Xavier Hutchinson: 5 receptions, 69 yards, 1 TD
Jaylin Noel: 5 receptions, 63 yards
Jayden Higgins: 4 receptions, 34 yards, 1 TD
Ka’imi Fairbairn: 4/4 field goals, 2/2 extra points, 14 points
Kamari Lassiter: 1 interception
San Francisco 49ers
Mac Jones: 19/32, 193 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT, 84.5 rating
Christian McCaffrey: 8 carries, 25 yards; 3 receptions, 43 yards
Jauan Jennings: 4 receptions, 45 yards
Kendrick Bourne: 3 receptions, 44 yards
George Kittle: 4 receptions, 43 yards, 1 TD
Deommodore Lenoir: 1 interception
Brian Robinson Jr.: 3 kick returns, 99 yards
Thomas Morstead: 5 punts, 238 yards
What Fans Should Look At Beyond the Box Score
A traditional box score gives you the raw numbers, but the relationship between those numbers provides more useful insight.
The first thing to examine is offensive volume.
Houston had more passing attempts, more rushing attempts, more completions, more receiving yards, and more total yards.
The second factor is scoring efficiency.
Houston made four field goals, while San Francisco attempted none.
The third factor is defensive pressure.
Houston recorded two sacks and six quarterback hits, compared with zero sacks and two quarterback hits for San Francisco.
The fourth factor is offensive balance.
Houston’s 157 rushing yards complemented its 318 passing yards.
San Francisco’s 48 rushing yards placed greater pressure on its passing attack.
Together, these factors provide a more complete explanation for the 26-15 result.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score of the 49ers vs Texans game?
The Houston Texans defeated the San Francisco 49ers 26-15 on October 26, 2025.
Who was the leading passer in the game?
C.J. Stroud was the leading passer. He completed 30 of 39 attempts for 318 yards, two touchdowns and one interception.
Who led the Texans in receiving?
Xavier Hutchinson led Houston with five receptions for 69 yards and one touchdown.
Who led the 49ers in receiving?
Jauan Jennings led San Francisco in receiving yardage with four catches for 45 yards.
How many rushing yards did Christian McCaffrey have?
Christian McCaffrey rushed eight times for 25 yards, averaging 3.1 yards per carry. He also caught three passes for 43 yards.
Which team had more total offense?
Houston had 475 total yards, while San Francisco had 241. The Texans therefore produced 234 more yards of total offense.
Conclusion
The 49ers vs texans match player stats show that Houston’s 26-15 victory was built on broad statistical advantages rather than one isolated performance.
C.J. Stroud completed 30 of 39 passes for 318 yards and two touchdowns, while the Texans’ rushing attack added 157 yards on 36 attempts. Woody Marks contributed both on the ground and through the air, Xavier Hutchinson led the receiving group, and Ka’imi Fairbairn converted four field goals to finish with 14 points.
San Francisco received productive moments from Mac Jones, George Kittle, Jauan Jennings, Christian McCaffrey and its special teams unit. Deommodore Lenoir also recorded an interception. However, the 49ers finished with only 241 total yards and 48 rushing yards.
The biggest statistical takeaway is the difference in offensive volume. Houston produced 475 total yards compared with San Francisco’s 241. The Texans also generated two sacks and six quarterback hits while maintaining a much more balanced offensive attack.
Looking at the complete box score therefore provides a clearer picture than the final score alone. The passing numbers, rushing workload, receiving production, defensive pressure, turnovers and special teams all contributed to understanding how Houston produced a 26-15 victory.
