Jacksonville Jaguars vs 49ers Match Player Stats
The jacksonville jaguars vs 49ers match player stats from September 28, 2025, tell the story of a game that was much more competitive than the final margin suggests. Jacksonville defeated San Francisco 26-21 at Levi’s Stadium, improving to 3-1 while the 49ers also moved to 3-1 after the loss. The Jaguars built their advantage through a strong rushing performance, two interceptions from Devin Lloyd, a huge punt-return touchdown by Parker Washington, and enough late-game execution to protect a five-point lead. San Francisco moved the ball efficiently through the air, but two interceptions and a costly late fumble helped Jacksonville preserve the victory.
For readers looking beyond the final score, this game offers several useful statistical lessons. Trevor Lawrence was not asked to produce a massive passing total because Jacksonville’s running game was effective. Travis Etienne Jr. supplied 124 rushing yards and a 48-yard touchdown, while Jacksonville’s defense repeatedly created problems for Brock Purdy.
At the same time, Purdy’s 309 passing yards and Christian McCaffrey’s 92 receiving yards show why the 49ers remained within striking distance throughout the second half.
The result was a game in which Jacksonville won several important statistical battles without dominating every category.
Jacksonville Jaguars vs 49ers Match Player Stats
The final score was Jacksonville 26, San Francisco 21. Jacksonville scored 17 points in the second quarter and another nine in the third, while San Francisco answered with eight points in the third and seven in the fourth.
| Quarter | Jaguars | 49ers |
| Q1 | 0 | 3 |
| Q2 | 17 | 3 |
| Q3 | 9 | 8 |
| Q4 | 0 | 7 |
| Final | 26 | 21 |
The official NFL schedule confirms the September 28 result and the records at the time of the game. NFL 2025 Jacksonville Jaguars Schedule
The quarter-by-quarter scoring is important because Jacksonville did not win by steadily adding points every period. Instead, the Jaguars created a decisive middle-game advantage and then survived San Francisco’s fourth-quarter push.
That pattern also explains why the player statistics deserve more attention than a simple final-score recap.
Trevor Lawrence Passing Performance
Trevor Lawrence finished the game with:
| Passing Statistic | Trevor Lawrence |
| Completions | 21 |
| Attempts | 31 |
| Completion Rate | 67.7% |
| Passing Yards | 174 |
| Yards per Attempt | 5.6 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 0 |
| Sacks | 0 |
| QBR | 67.2 |
| Passer Rating | 92.7 |
Lawrence completed 21 of 31 passes for 174 yards and one touchdown. He did not throw an interception and was not sacked.
Those numbers may look modest next to Purdy’s 309 passing yards, but context matters.
Jacksonville did not need Lawrence to throw 300 yards because the offense found considerable success on the ground. A quarterback’s value in a particular game cannot always be measured by raw passing yardage alone.
Lawrence’s 21 completions also helped Jacksonville maintain possession and move the chains without putting the ball in unnecessary danger.
The most important statistical feature of his performance was the absence of turnovers. San Francisco’s defense failed to intercept him, while Jacksonville’s defense intercepted Purdy twice.
That difference became especially important in a five-point game.
Lawrence’s Efficiency Versus Volume
The 174 passing yards represented only 5.6 yards per attempt, so this was not an explosive passing performance.
Instead, Jacksonville used Lawrence as part of a balanced offensive structure.
The quarterback completed short and intermediate throws, while the running game handled a substantial portion of the workload. That approach reduced the need for high-volume passing and helped Jacksonville control important stretches of the game.
His 92.7 passer rating also reflects the value of avoiding interceptions while producing a touchdown.
Brock Purdy Passing Statistics
Brock Purdy produced significantly more passing yardage but also had a much more difficult turnover profile.
| Passing Statistic | Brock Purdy |
| Completions | 22 |
| Attempts | 38 |
| Completion Rate | 57.9% |
| Passing Yards | 309 |
| Yards per Attempt | 8.1 |
| Touchdowns | 2 |
| Interceptions | 2 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Sacks Taken | 3 yards listed in supplied data |
| QBR | 53.7 |
| Passer Rating | 79.8 |
Purdy completed 22 of 38 attempts for 309 yards and two touchdowns.
His 8.1 yards per attempt was considerably higher than Lawrence’s 5.6. That indicates San Francisco generated more yardage per passing attempt when its throws were completed.
However, Purdy also threw two interceptions.
Both interceptions came from Devin Lloyd, who became one of the defining defensive players of the game.
This is a useful example of why box-score analysis should consider both production and efficiency. Purdy’s passing yardage was excellent in isolation, but the two turnovers had a direct impact on Jacksonville’s ability to control the game.
Devin Lloyd’s Two-Interception Performance
Devin Lloyd recorded two interceptions and added eight total tackles, including six solo tackles, one tackle for loss, and two passes defended.
His interceptions came at important moments.
The first occurred in the second quarter when Purdy’s pass intended for Christian McCaffrey was intercepted by Lloyd. Jacksonville subsequently maintained its advantage and entered halftime ahead 17-6.
Lloyd’s second interception came in the third quarter on a pass intended for Jauan Jennings. Jacksonville turned that turnover into another scoring opportunity.
For defensive analysis, this is one of the clearest examples of impact not fully captured by tackle totals.
A defender can finish a game with a modest number of tackles but still dramatically affect the result through turnovers. Lloyd did both.
His eight tackles provided consistent involvement, while the two interceptions directly disrupted San Francisco’s passing attack.
Travis Etienne Jr. Was the Key Rushing Weapon
Travis Etienne Jr. produced one of the strongest individual rushing performances of the game.
| Rushing Statistic | Travis Etienne Jr. |
| Carries | 19 |
| Rushing Yards | 124 |
| Average | 6.5 |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
| Long Run | 48 yards |
Etienne averaged 6.5 yards per carry and scored on a 48-yard touchdown run.
That explosive play was particularly significant because it immediately changed the scoring situation after Jacksonville recovered a San Francisco fumble early in the second quarter.
Etienne’s performance was not based entirely on one run, either.
His 19 carries produced 124 yards, meaning Jacksonville consistently relied on him to establish offensive rhythm.
The 48-yard touchdown was the highlight, but the overall rushing volume is equally important.
Jacksonville finished with 151 team rushing yards on 32 attempts, averaging 4.7 yards per carry.
Etienne accounted for most of that production.
Jacksonville’s Rushing Approach
Jacksonville’s rushing distribution included:
- Travis Etienne Jr.: 19 carries, 124 yards, 1 touchdown
- Bhayshul Tuten: 4 carries, 14 yards
- Brian Thomas Jr.: 1 carry, 7 yards
- Trevor Lawrence: 7 carries, 7 yards
- Parker Washington: 1 carry, minus-1 yard
The team total was 151 rushing yards.
This balance between rushing volume and passing efficiency helped Jacksonville avoid becoming dependent on Lawrence’s arm.
The Jaguars could keep attacking with Etienne, use Lawrence on designed or situational runs, and rely on shorter passing concepts when necessary.
Christian McCaffrey’s All-Around Production
Christian McCaffrey was one of San Francisco’s most productive players despite the team’s defeat.
His rushing statistics were:
| Rushing Statistic | Christian McCaffrey |
| Carries | 17 |
| Rushing Yards | 49 |
| Average | 2.9 |
| Touchdowns | 0 |
| Long Run | 11 yards |
McCaffrey averaged only 2.9 yards per carry, and San Francisco’s entire rushing attack generated 83 yards on 24 attempts.
That was one of the clearest statistical differences between the teams.
Jacksonville averaged 4.7 yards per rushing attempt.
San Francisco averaged 3.5.
The 1.2-yard difference may appear small, but across dozens of rushing attempts it becomes meaningful.
McCaffrey’s greater impact came as a receiver.
He caught six passes for 92 yards and one touchdown on 11 targets.
His receiving line included a 29-yard gain and a 15.3-yard average per reception.
That production explains how San Francisco accumulated 309 passing yards even though Jacksonville held the 49ers to only 83 rushing yards.
San Francisco’s Receiving Production
The 49ers finished with 22 receptions for 309 yards and two touchdowns.
Their leading receiving figures were:
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Targets |
| Christian McCaffrey | 6 | 92 | 15.3 | 1 | 11 |
| Jake Tonges | 3 | 58 | 19.3 | 1 | 5 |
| Ricky Pearsall | 4 | 46 | 11.5 | 0 | 5 |
| Kyle Juszczyk | 3 | 32 | 10.7 | 0 | 3 |
| Jauan Jennings | 2 | 24 | 12.0 | 0 | 4 |
| Demarcus Robinson | 1 | 20 | 20.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Luke Farrell | 2 | 20 | 10.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kendrick Bourne | 1 | 17 | 17.0 | 0 | 4 |
Jake Tonges delivered an especially efficient performance, catching three passes for 58 yards and a touchdown.
His 19.3 yards per reception was the highest average among the primary San Francisco receivers listed in the supplied statistics.
His 21-yard touchdown reception in the fourth quarter brought the 49ers within five points.
That score made the closing stages much more competitive.
Jacksonville’s Receiving Statistics
Jacksonville’s passing attack produced 174 receiving yards from 21 receptions.
| Player | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Targets |
| Brian Thomas Jr. | 5 | 49 | 9.8 | 0 | 7 |
| Brenton Strange | 6 | 45 | 7.5 | 0 | 7 |
| Travis Hunter | 3 | 42 | 14.0 | 0 | 5 |
| Hunter Long | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 1 | 3 |
| Bhayshul Tuten | 1 | 8 | 8.0 | 0 | 1 |
| LeQuint Allen Jr. | 1 | 7 | 7.0 | 0 | 1 |
| Travis Etienne Jr. | 1 | 1 | 1.0 | 0 | 2 |
| Tim Patrick | 1 | -1 | -1.0 | 0 | 1 |
Brenton Strange led Jacksonville with six receptions.
Brian Thomas Jr. followed with five catches for 49 yards.
Travis Hunter recorded three receptions for 42 yards and averaged 14.0 yards per catch.
Hunter Long also produced a touchdown reception.
The distribution shows that Jacksonville did not rely on one receiver for most of its passing production. Instead, Lawrence spread the ball across several players.
Parker Washington’s 87-Yard Punt Return
One of the most important individual plays was not part of the conventional passing or rushing statistics.
Parker Washington returned a punt 87 yards for a touchdown.
His return statistics were:
| Punt Return Statistic | Parker Washington |
| Returns | 1 |
| Yards | 87 |
| Average | 87.0 |
| Long | 87 yards |
| Touchdowns | 1 |
An 87-yard punt return touchdown is a major field-position swing.
It gave Jacksonville seven points without requiring the offense to run an offensive play.
This is precisely why special teams should be included when evaluating the overall player statistics from an NFL game.
A team can win the offensive yardage battle or lose it and still determine the outcome through returns, field position, turnovers, and kicking.
Washington’s return was a perfect example.
Jacksonville’s Defensive Statistics
Jacksonville finished with 66 total tackles, including 34 solo tackles.
The defensive totals included:
- 1 sack
- 3 tackles for loss
- 4 passes defended
- 3 quarterback hits
- 2 interceptions
- 1 defensive touchdown listed in the team statistics
The leading Jacksonville tacklers were:
| Player | Tackles | Solo | Other |
| Tyson Campbell | 9 | 4 | |
| Devin Lloyd | 8 | 6 | 1 TFL, 2 PD, 2 INT |
| Foyesade Oluokun | 7 | 2 | |
| Andrew Wingard | 5 | 3 | 1 PD |
| Antonio Johnson | 5 | 2 | |
| DaVon Hamilton | 4 | ||
| Dennis Gardeck | 3 | 3 | |
| Arik Armstead | 2 | 2 | 1 sack, 1 TFL |
| Jourdan Lewis | 2 | 2 | |
| Josh Hines-Allen | 2 | 2 | 1 TFL, 1 QB hit |
Tyson Campbell led the Jaguars with nine tackles.
Lloyd followed with eight.
Arik Armstead registered Jacksonville’s listed sack, while Josh Hines-Allen contributed a tackle for loss and quarterback hit.
The combination of tackles, interceptions, and pressure helped Jacksonville contain San Francisco’s offense at critical moments.
San Francisco Defensive Statistics
The 49ers recorded 66 tackles, matching Jacksonville’s team tackle total.
San Francisco had:
- 40 solo tackles
- 0 sacks
- 6 tackles for loss
- 2 passes defended
- 0 quarterback hits
- 0 interceptions
Dee Winters led the team with 10 tackles, including nine solo tackles.
Other notable defensive totals included:
| Player | Tackles | Solo | Other |
| Dee Winters | 10 | 9 | 1 TFL, 1 PD |
| Marques Sigle | 8 | 6 | 1 PD |
| Fred Warner | 8 | 5 | |
| Deommodore Lenoir | 6 | 5 | 1 TFL |
| Jason Pinnock | 6 | 2 | |
| Darrell Luter Jr. | 5 | 3 | 1 TFL |
| Sam Okuayinonu | 4 | 2 | 1 TFL |
| Yetur Gross-Matos | 3 | ||
| Bryce Huff | 2 | 2 | 1 TFL |
| Brayden Willis | 2 | 2 | |
| Mykel Williams | 2 | 1 |
San Francisco’s defense produced six tackles for loss, which was more than Jacksonville’s three.
However, the 49ers did not record a sack or interception.
That difference is important because Jacksonville’s defense generated two interceptions and a late fumble recovery.
Turnovers Changed the Game
Turnovers were one of the strongest statistical themes.
Jacksonville recorded two interceptions and recovered two fumbles according to the supplied individual statistics, while San Francisco lost two fumbles.
The most significant San Francisco mistakes were connected to Brock Purdy and Luke Farrell.
Purdy lost a fumble late in the fourth quarter after being sacked by Arik Armstead. Foyesade Oluokun recovered the ball for Jacksonville.
That recovery occurred with the 49ers still trailing 26-21.
Jacksonville was then able to run out the remaining clock.
This sequence demonstrates how one defensive play can become more important than a large collection of ordinary statistics.
Purdy had already thrown for 309 yards and two touchdowns, but the late fumble prevented San Francisco from getting another possession.
Jacksonville’s Special Teams Impact
Jacksonville also generated meaningful value in the kicking and return game.
Cam Little finished 2-for-3 on field goals and converted both extra-point attempts for eight total points.
His longest successful field goal was 44 yards.
Jacksonville’s punting numbers were:
- 5 punts
- 237 total yards
- 47.4-yard average
- 58-yard long
- 2 touchbacks
- 1 punt inside the 20
Logan Cooke handled the punting.
The Jaguars also returned four kickoffs for 103 yards.
Bhayshul Tuten was particularly effective as a kick returner, recording two returns for 78 yards with a 39.0-yard average and a long of 54 yards.
Those returns contributed to Jacksonville’s field-position advantage.
San Francisco Special Teams Statistics
San Francisco’s kicking production came from Eddy Pineiro.
He converted both field-goal attempts and his lone extra-point attempt:
| Kicking Statistic | Eddy Pineiro |
| Field Goals | 2/2 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 100% |
| Long | 26 yards |
| Extra Points | 1/1 |
| Points | 7 |
San Francisco also recorded three kickoff returns for 80 yards.
Skyy Moore handled those returns, averaging 26.7 yards per return with a 29-yard long.
The 49ers had two punts for 91 yards, averaging 45.5 yards.
The Most Important Statistical Differences
Looking at the entire box score reveals several important contrasts.
1. Jacksonville Won the Rushing Efficiency Battle
Jacksonville:
151 yards on 32 carries, 4.7 average
San Francisco:
83 yards on 24 carries, 3.5 average
The Jaguars produced 68 more rushing yards.
That difference allowed Jacksonville to reduce pressure on Lawrence and maintain offensive balance.
2. San Francisco Won the Passing Yardage Battle
Jacksonville:
174 passing yards
San Francisco:
309 passing yards
The 49ers produced 135 more passing yards.
That is a substantial advantage.
However, passing yardage did not translate into a victory because San Francisco also committed turnovers.
3. Jacksonville Won the Interception Battle
Jacksonville intercepted Purdy twice.
San Francisco did not intercept Lawrence.
That is one of the clearest differences in the game.
4. Jacksonville Had the Bigger Special Teams Play
Parker Washington’s 87-yard punt return touchdown produced seven points without requiring an offensive possession.
That type of play can dramatically alter a close game.
5. Jacksonville Created the Critical Late Turnover
The Armstead sack and Oluokun recovery ended San Francisco’s final meaningful opportunity.
The timing was just as important as the play itself.
Why the Final Score Does Not Tell the Entire Story
A five-point victory can be interpreted incorrectly if the analysis only focuses on the final score.
San Francisco accumulated more passing yards.
Purdy threw for 309 yards compared with Lawrence’s 174.
The 49ers also had 22 receptions compared with Jacksonville’s 21.
Yet Jacksonville controlled other parts of the game.
The Jaguars rushed for 151 yards compared with San Francisco’s 83.
Jacksonville also produced two interceptions.
The Jaguars scored a punt-return touchdown.
Etienne generated a 48-yard rushing touchdown.
These plays created points and field position without requiring Jacksonville to win every statistical category.
That is one of the most useful lessons from this matchup.
What the Player Statistics Reveal About Jacksonville
The numbers point to a balanced Jacksonville performance.
Lawrence did not need to carry the offense through a high-volume passing attack.
Etienne handled the primary rushing workload.
The receiving production was spread across multiple targets.
The defense created turnovers.
Special teams produced an 87-yard touchdown.
This is a complete-game profile rather than a performance dependent on one statistical category.
The most important individual contributors were therefore not limited to the quarterback.
Etienne’s 124 rushing yards, Lloyd’s two interceptions, and Washington’s 87-yard punt return each addressed different parts of the game.
Together, those contributions explain the final result more effectively than Lawrence’s passing line alone.
What the Player Statistics Reveal About San Francisco
San Francisco’s statistics reveal an offense capable of producing explosive passing yardage but vulnerable to mistakes.
Purdy averaged 8.1 yards per attempt.
McCaffrey generated 92 receiving yards.
Tonges averaged 19.3 yards per reception.
The 49ers produced 309 passing yards.
Those numbers demonstrate significant passing efficiency.
The problem was that San Francisco could not pair that passing production with enough rushing efficiency or turnover protection.
The 49ers managed only 83 rushing yards.
Purdy threw two interceptions and later lost a fumble.
The result was an offense that produced plenty of yardage but failed to convert enough of that production into a winning scoring margin.
Player Stats Worth Remembering From the Game
Several individual numbers stand above the rest:
Trevor Lawrence
21 completions on 31 attempts, 174 yards, 1 touchdown, 0 interceptions.
Brock Purdy
22 completions on 38 attempts, 309 yards, 2 touchdowns, 2 interceptions.
Travis Etienne Jr.
19 carries, 124 yards, 6.5 yards per carry, 1 touchdown.
Christian McCaffrey
17 carries for 49 rushing yards, plus 6 receptions for 92 yards and 1 touchdown.
Devin Lloyd
8 tackles, 6 solo tackles, 2 interceptions.
Parker Washington
1 punt return, 87 yards, 1 touchdown.
Jake Tonges
3 receptions, 58 yards, 1 touchdown.
These numbers provide a concise statistical snapshot of how the game developed.
How to Read NFL Match Player Stats More Effectively
A common mistake is to look only at the highest yardage totals.
A better method is to examine five areas.
Start With Efficiency
- For quarterbacks, compare completion percentage, yards per attempt, touchdowns, interceptions, sacks, and passer rating.
- For running backs, examine yards per carry alongside total rushing yards.
- For receivers, look at receptions, targets, yards per reception, and touchdowns.
Then Examine Volume
A player with 20 carries has a different workload from a player with five carries.
Similarly, 11 targets tell a different story from two targets.
Volume provides context for efficiency.
Look at Turnovers
Turnovers can have an immediate effect on possession and scoring opportunities.
In this game, Jacksonville’s two interceptions and late fumble recovery were particularly important.
Include Special Teams
Kick returns, punt returns, field goals, and punting can all affect the outcome.
Washington’s 87-yard touchdown is an excellent example.
Finally, Consider Game Situation
A player can accumulate statistics while his team trails by multiple scores.
Late-game yardage does not always have the same significance as production that directly changes the score or field position.
Common Mistakes When Comparing These Stats
One of the easiest mistakes is to declare that the quarterback with more passing yards automatically played the better statistical game.
The numbers here show why that approach is incomplete.
Purdy threw for 309 yards.
Lawrence threw for 174.
But Jacksonville won.
The difference was not simply quarterback production.
Rushing efficiency, turnovers, defensive plays, special teams, and scoring opportunities all mattered.
Another mistake is ignoring the timing of statistics.
An interception in the second quarter and an interception in the final minutes can have different effects on game strategy.
The same is true of a fumble recovered when the opponent is attempting a comeback.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who won the Jaguars vs 49ers game on September 28, 2025?
The Jacksonville Jaguars defeated the San Francisco 49ers 26-21 on September 28, 2025.
How many passing yards did Trevor Lawrence have?
Trevor Lawrence completed 21 of 31 passes for 174 yards, one touchdown, and no interceptions.
How many passing yards did Brock Purdy have?
Brock Purdy completed 22 of 38 passes for 309 yards and two touchdowns. He also threw two interceptions.
How many rushing yards did Travis Etienne Jr. have?
Travis Etienne Jr. rushed 19 times for 124 yards, averaging 6.5 yards per carry, and scored one touchdown.
How did Christian McCaffrey perform?
McCaffrey rushed 17 times for 49 yards and added six receptions for 92 yards and one receiving touchdown.
Who had two interceptions for Jacksonville?
Devin Lloyd recorded both of Jacksonville’s interceptions. He finished with eight tackles and two interceptions.
Conclusion
The jacksonville jaguars vs 49ers match player stats from September 28, 2025, show a game decided by balance, turnovers, rushing efficiency, and key special-teams plays.
Trevor Lawrence delivered an efficient turnover-free passing performance, while Travis Etienne provided 124 rushing yards and a 48-yard touchdown. Jacksonville’s defense created two interceptions through Devin Lloyd and recovered a crucial late fumble after Arik Armstead’s sack.
San Francisco produced the larger passing total. Brock Purdy threw for 309 yards and two touchdowns, while Christian McCaffrey contributed 92 receiving yards and a touchdown. Jake Tonges also delivered a highly efficient receiving performance with 58 yards and a score.
However, San Francisco’s 83 rushing yards, two interceptions, and late fumble recovery by Jacksonville created a difficult path to victory.
The biggest statistical takeaway is that yardage alone did not determine the game. Jacksonville won through a combination of 151 rushing yards, defensive turnovers, a game-changing 87-yard punt return touchdown, and late-game ball control.
For anyone studying the jacksonville jaguars vs 49ers match player stats, the most useful approach is therefore to look beyond the headline numbers. Lawrence’s 174 passing yards were only one part of Jacksonville’s performance, just as Purdy’s 309 yards were only one part of San Francisco’s. The complete box score shows how rushing efficiency, turnovers, defensive production, receiving contributions, and special teams combined to produce a 26-21 Jacksonville victory.
