Lakers vs Pacers Match Player Stats

Lakers vs Pacers match player stats from the March 25, 2026 meeting at Gainbridge Fieldhouse tell the story of a high-scoring game that the Los Angeles Lakers controlled early and then had to defend against a major Indiana Pacers comeback attempt. Los Angeles finished with a 137-130 victory, led by Luka Doncic’s 43 points, while Austin Reaves added 25 and LeBron James finished with 23 points, nine rebounds, and nine assists. On the Indiana side, Pascal Siakam led the team with 20 points, while Andrew Nembhard produced a career-high 19 assists alongside 14 points.

The game was played at Gainbridge Fieldhouse in Indianapolis before an announced attendance of 17,274. The Lakers shot 56.2% from the field and made 50 of 89 attempts, while Indiana shot 55.8% on 48 of 86 shooting. The difference came through several smaller areas of the box score, including turnovers, free throws, rebounds, and the Lakers’ ability to build a substantial early lead.

For anyone studying Lakers vs Pacers match player stats, this game is particularly useful because the final score alone does not explain how the contest developed. Los Angeles built a 29-point advantage, Indiana won the fourth quarter 45-32, and the Pacers eventually reduced the deficit to six points before the Lakers closed the game.

Table of Contents

The most important numbers from the game are shown below.

Category	Los Angeles Lakers	Indiana Pacers
Final Score	137	130
Field Goals	50/89	48/86
Field Goal %	56.2%	55.8%
Three-Pointers	9/23	16/39
Three-Point %	39.1%	41.0%
Free Throws	28/34	18/23
Free Throw %	82.4%	78.3%
Rebounds	39	34
Assists	30	35
Turnovers	13	18
Steals	15	7
Blocks	4	2
Offensive Rebounds	7	5
Defensive Rebounds	32	29
Fouls	22	25

The numbers show a fascinating contrast. Indiana actually made more three-pointers and recorded more assists, but Los Angeles generated advantages in free throws, rebounding, turnovers, and steals.

The Lakers’ 15 steals were especially significant. Indiana committed 18 turnovers compared with 13 by Los Angeles, giving the Lakers more opportunities to score without relying entirely on half-court offense.

Lakers Player Stats

Luka Doncic was the clear scoring leader for Los Angeles. He finished with 43 points on 15-of-30 shooting, including four three-pointers, and made nine of his 10 free throws. He also contributed six rebounds, seven assists, and one steal.

LeBron James added 23 points, nine rebounds, and nine assists. Austin Reaves contributed 25 points and eight assists, while Jaxson Hayes posted 21 points and 10 rebounds.

Here is the Lakers’ main statistical breakdown:

Lakers Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists
Luka Doncic	43	6	7
Austin Reaves	25	1	8
LeBron James	23	9	9
Jaxson Hayes	21	10	1
Luke Kennard	8	2	2
Jake LaRavia	6	5	1
Jarred Vanderbilt	5	1	0
Bronny James	4	1	1
Maxi Kleber	2	4	1

The official box score confirms that Doncic led all scorers with 43 points, while Reaves scored 25 and James scored 23. Hayes was also highly efficient, making nine of 11 field-goal attempts while recording a double-double with 21 points and 10 rebounds.

Luka Doncic’s 43-Point Performance

Doncic’s performance was the central feature of the game.

He attempted 30 field goals and made 15, giving him a 50% field-goal percentage. He also converted four of 11 attempts from three-point range and nine of 10 free throws.

His 43 points were not simply a product of high-volume shooting. Doncic also created opportunities for teammates, finishing with seven assists. His ability to combine scoring and playmaking made it difficult for Indiana to completely shift its defensive attention toward him.

The first quarter was especially important. Doncic scored 21 points in the opening period, which the Pacers’ official game rewind noted was the third-most points scored against Indiana in a single quarter that season at that point.

That explosive beginning helped Los Angeles establish its early advantage.

LeBron James Near Triple-Double

LeBron James delivered one of the most balanced stat lines of the game.

He finished with:

23 points
9 rebounds
9 assists
1 steal
52.9% field-goal shooting
100% free-throw shooting

James made nine of 17 field-goal attempts and all five of his free throws.

The nine assists were particularly important because Los Angeles did not need him to carry the entire scoring load with Doncic producing 43 points. Instead, James could contribute as a scorer, rebounder, and facilitator.

His nine rebounds also helped the Lakers finish with a 39-34 advantage on the glass.

Austin Reaves Adds 25 Points

Austin Reaves gave Los Angeles another major scoring option.

He scored 25 points on seven-of-16 shooting and added eight assists. He also made nine of nine free throws.

That free-throw performance mattered because Indiana could not completely erase Los Angeles’ scoring advantage by forcing the Lakers away from the three-point line.

Reaves’ eight assists also reinforced the broader theme of the Lakers’ offense. The team did not depend on one player to create every possession. Doncic, James, and Reaves all contributed significantly as playmakers.

Jaxson Hayes Controls the Interior

Jaxson Hayes finished with 21 points and 10 rebounds.

His nine-of-11 shooting was one of the most efficient individual performances on the Lakers’ roster. Hayes also recorded two blocks and two steals.

His offensive efficiency helped Los Angeles maintain pressure around the basket. While Indiana made 16 three-pointers, the Lakers produced 70 points in the paint according to the official game summary.

That contrast is important when examining the complete statistical picture. Indiana’s perimeter shooting was strong, but Los Angeles repeatedly generated interior scoring.

Indiana Pacers Player Stats

The Pacers had several productive individual performances even though they finished on the losing side.

Pascal Siakam led Indiana with 20 points. Jay Huff scored 18, T.J. McConnell added 17, and Jarace Walker and Obi Toppin each scored 15.

Andrew Nembhard was the standout playmaker, recording 19 assists and 14 points.

Pacers Player	Points	Rebounds	Assists
Pascal Siakam	20	8	0
Jay Huff	18	6	0
T.J. McConnell	17	2	3
Jarace Walker	15	6	4
Obi Toppin	15	3	2
Andrew Nembhard	14	2	19
Aaron Nesmith	14	3	1
Ben Sheppard	13	2	2
Micah Potter	4	2	0
Kobe Brown	0	0	1
Quenton Jackson	0	0	1

The official NBA box score confirms Nembhard’s 19 assists, which represented a career high, while Siakam finished with 20 points and eight rebounds.

Andrew Nembhard’s 19 Assists

Nembhard produced one of the most unusual statistical performances of the night.

He finished with:

14 points
2 rebounds
19 assists
33.3% field-goal shooting
33.3% three-point shooting
100% free-throw shooting

His 19 assists were a career high. Indiana also finished with 35 total assists on 48 made field goals, demonstrating how much passing contributed to the Pacers’ offensive production.

Nembhard’s performance is important when interpreting the game beyond the final result. Indiana generated excellent ball movement and created enough offensive opportunities to score 130 points.

The problem was that Los Angeles created even more scoring opportunities and protected its early advantage well enough to survive Indiana’s fourth-quarter push.

Pascal Siakam Leads Indiana in Scoring

Siakam finished as Indiana’s leading scorer with 20 points and added eight rebounds.

He played 30 minutes and eventually fouled out with roughly five minutes remaining, according to the Pacers’ official game recap.

His eight rebounds were also important because Indiana needed additional interior production against a Lakers team that finished with 39 rebounds.

Jay Huff Provides Efficient Scoring

Jay Huff scored 18 points and collected six rebounds.

His outside shooting was particularly useful early. The Pacers’ official recap noted that Huff hit back-to-back three-pointers after Indiana fell behind 10-0 at the start of the game.

Huff’s ability to score from outside gave Indiana another way to attack a Lakers defense that was trying to protect the paint.

T.J. McConnell Gives the Bench a Boost

McConnell scored 17 points in just over 14 minutes.

He made eight of 10 field-goal attempts, an extremely efficient shooting performance. He also recorded three assists and one steal.

His scoring helped Indiana’s bench contribute to the fourth-quarter comeback, although the Lakers ultimately maintained enough separation to secure the win.

How the Game Developed Quarter by Quarter

The scoring pattern provides one of the clearest explanations of the result.

Quarter	Lakers	Pacers	Lakers Lead
Q1	45	28	17
Q2	30	31	16
Q3	30	26	20
Q4	32	45	7
Final	137	130	7

Los Angeles dominated the first quarter, scoring 45 points compared with Indiana’s 28.

Indiana responded in the second quarter by winning the period 31-30, but that was not enough to erase the deficit.

The Lakers then restored control in the third quarter, outscoring Indiana 30-26.

The fourth quarter was where the game became genuinely competitive. Indiana scored 45 points, compared with 32 for Los Angeles.

That 13-point fourth-quarter advantage reduced what had been a much larger Lakers lead.

The 29-Point Lead That Nearly Disappeared

One of the most revealing statistics from this matchup is the Lakers’ 29-point maximum lead.

Los Angeles never trailed after taking an early 10-0 advantage. However, Indiana kept competing and eventually turned the fourth quarter into a pressure situation.

The Pacers reduced the deficit to 124-131 with 45 seconds remaining. Jarace Walker then hit a three-pointer that made the score 133-127 with 28 seconds left.

The Lakers responded effectively enough to close the game without allowing the comeback to reach its final stage.

This is why the final seven-point margin can be misleading if viewed without the game flow.

The Lakers were in control for most of the contest, but Indiana’s fourth-quarter offense was strong enough to create a legitimate late-game threat.

Shooting Comparison

Both teams shot almost identically from the field.

Los Angeles:

50 of 89
56.2% field goals
9 of 23 from three
39.1% three-point shooting
28 of 34 free throws
82.4% free-throw shooting

Indiana:

48 of 86
55.8% field goals
16 of 39 from three
41.0% three-point shooting
18 of 23 free throws
78.3% free-throw shooting

Indiana actually had the better three-point percentage and made seven more three-pointers.

That makes the Lakers’ victory more interesting. Los Angeles did not win because it dominated the perimeter shooting category.

Instead, the Lakers compensated through volume inside the arc, free throws, rebounding, and turnover creation.

Why Free Throws Mattered

Los Angeles attempted 34 free throws and made 28.

Indiana attempted only 23 and made 18.

That created a 10-point difference in made free throws.

The Lakers’ 82.4% accuracy from the line also meant they converted most of the opportunities they earned.

In a seven-point game, a 10-point free-throw advantage is significant. It helped offset Indiana’s superior three-point volume.

Rebounding Battle

The Lakers won the rebounding battle 39-34.

Los Angeles collected:

7 offensive rebounds
32 defensive rebounds

Indiana recorded:

5 offensive rebounds
29 defensive rebounds

The five-rebound overall advantage was not enormous, but it contributed to the Lakers’ ability to generate additional possessions and finish defensive sequences.

Jaxson Hayes led the Lakers with 10 rebounds, while LeBron James added nine.

Pascal Siakam led Indiana with eight.

Turnovers and Steals

Turnovers were another important difference.

The Lakers committed 13 turnovers.

The Pacers committed 18.

Los Angeles also recorded 15 steals, more than double Indiana’s seven.

That combination gave the Lakers additional opportunities to attack before Indiana could establish its half-court defense.

The official game summary shows that Los Angeles produced 22 fast-break points, while Indiana scored 23.

The fast-break numbers were therefore relatively close, but the Lakers’ turnover advantage still mattered because every lost Indiana possession reduced the number of chances available for its high-powered offense.

Points in the Paint

Los Angeles scored 70 points in the paint.

Indiana recorded 54.

That 16-point difference is one of the clearest explanations for the final result.

Indiana compensated with perimeter shooting, making 16 three-pointers. Los Angeles, however, repeatedly attacked inside and generated efficient scoring opportunities around the basket.

This also helps explain Jaxson Hayes’ 21 points on 81.8% shooting.

The Lakers did not need to win every statistical category. Their interior scoring gave them a reliable source of offense that complemented Doncic’s perimeter and isolation scoring.

Lakers Offensive Structure

The Lakers’ offensive production was spread across several primary creators.

Doncic scored 43 and recorded seven assists.

James scored 23 and recorded nine assists.

Reaves scored 25 and recorded eight assists.

Together, those three players accounted for 91 points and 24 assists.

That combination demonstrates how Los Angeles could create offense in different ways.

Doncic provided high-volume scoring and playmaking. James contributed across multiple areas. Reaves added efficient scoring and secondary creation.

This distribution made it difficult for Indiana to rely on one defensive solution.

Pacers Offensive Structure

Indiana’s offense was more heavily connected to ball movement.

The Pacers finished with 35 assists, five more than Los Angeles.

Nembhard was responsible for 19 of those assists.

That means more than half of Indiana’s team assists came from one player.

His passing allowed the Pacers to generate shots for several contributors, including Siakam, Huff, Toppin, Nesmith, Walker, and McConnell.

Indiana also made 16 three-pointers, giving the team a strong perimeter scoring base.

However, the 18 turnovers limited the efficiency of that offensive approach.

What the Advanced Box Score Tells Us

A simple look at points might suggest that Doncic’s 43 points were the entire story.

The broader statistical profile says something more nuanced.

Los Angeles won because several moderate advantages worked together.

The Lakers:

Shot 56.2% from the field.
Made 28 free throws.
Won the rebounding battle.
Committed five fewer turnovers.
Recorded eight more steals.
Scored 70 points in the paint.
Built a 29-point lead.
Had three major offensive contributors.

Indiana:

Shot 55.8% from the field.
Made 16 three-pointers.
Recorded 35 assists.
Won the fourth quarter 45-32.
Received 19 assists from Nembhard.
Had five players score at least 14 points.

The final score therefore reflects a game where both offenses were highly productive, but Los Angeles created enough separation during the first three quarters to withstand Indiana’s late surge.

Season Series and Previous Meeting

The Lakers completed a 2-0 season-series sweep over Indiana.

The previous meeting listed in the provided game data was a 128-117 Lakers victory on March 7, 2026.

The second meeting was even more offensively productive, with Los Angeles scoring 137 and Indiana scoring 130.

The two results also provide useful context for readers researching the matchup over the course of the season rather than looking at one isolated box score.

Lakers vs Pacers Match Player Stats: Key Takeaways

For readers searching Lakers vs Pacers match player stats, several individual and team-level conclusions stand out.

1. Luka Doncic was the game’s leading scorer

Doncic finished with 43 points, the highest individual scoring total in the game.

His 15 made field goals and nine made free throws accounted for much of his production.

2. Andrew Nembhard produced a career-best passing performance

Nembhard finished with 19 assists and 14 points.

The official Pacers recap identifies the 19 assists as a new career high.

3. LeBron James nearly recorded a triple-double

James finished with 23 points, nine rebounds, and nine assists.

He fell one rebound and one assist short of a triple-double.

4. Jaxson Hayes produced a double-double

Hayes scored 21 points and grabbed 10 rebounds while shooting nine of 11 from the field.

5. Indiana won the fourth quarter but not the game

The Pacers scored 45 points in the final period, compared with 32 for Los Angeles.

The comeback reduced the margin substantially, but the early deficit was too large to overcome.

6. The Lakers won despite making fewer three-pointers

Indiana made 16 three-pointers.

Los Angeles made nine.

The Lakers compensated with stronger free-throw production and interior scoring.

7. Turnovers favored Los Angeles

The Lakers committed 13 turnovers compared with 18 for Indiana.

That five-possession difference was meaningful in a game decided by seven points.

How to Read This Box Score Correctly

A common mistake when reviewing a basketball box score is to focus only on the top scorer.

That approach would identify Doncic’s 43 points but miss several factors that shaped the game.

A better method is to examine the box score in layers.

First, check the final score and shooting percentages.

Next, compare free throws and three-pointers because these categories explain how teams generate efficient points.

Then examine rebounds and turnovers to estimate possession advantages.

Finally, look at individual playmaking and scoring distribution.

Using that method for this game reveals why Indiana remained competitive despite falling behind early.

The Pacers had better three-point volume and more assists, but the Lakers had a strong interior attack, fewer turnovers, more steals, more rebounds, and a substantial free-throw advantage.

Full Statistical Context for the Matchup

The game also provides a useful example of why a team can score 130 points and still lose by seven.

Indiana’s 55.8% shooting was excellent.

Its 41% three-point shooting was also strong.

The team recorded 35 assists, which indicates effective passing.

Yet Indiana’s 18 turnovers created unnecessary lost possessions. The Pacers also gave up 70 points in the paint and allowed Los Angeles to attempt 34 free throws.

Los Angeles, meanwhile, shot 56.2% and made 28 free throws.

The Lakers did not need a major shooting advantage because their possession management and interior scoring helped create enough separation.

Player Impact Beyond the Scoring Column

Another important lesson from this matchup is that scoring totals should not be viewed independently.

James’ nine assists helped organize the Lakers’ offense.

Reaves’ eight assists provided additional playmaking.

Hayes’ 10 rebounds supported second-chance opportunities and defensive possessions.

Doncic’s seven assists meant that his 43-point scoring night also included substantial involvement in creating shots for teammates.

On Indiana’s side, Nembhard’s 19 assists were arguably the most unusual statistical achievement of the game.

Toppin scored 15 points on seven-of-10 shooting.

McConnell scored 17 on eight-of-10 shooting.

Ben Sheppard scored 13 and made four of five three-point attempts.

These performances show that Indiana received meaningful contributions from multiple players despite the defeat.

The Importance of the First Quarter

The first quarter deserves special attention because it established the basic structure of the game.

Los Angeles scored 45 points.

Indiana scored 28.

That 17-point difference immediately forced the Pacers to play from behind.

Doncic’s 21 first-quarter points were central to that start. The Lakers also entered the game aggressively, taking a 10-0 lead before Indiana responded.

Once a team falls that far behind, even an efficient offense must spend the remainder of the game recovering ground.

Indiana eventually did exactly that, but it ran out of time.

Why the Fourth Quarter Was Different

The Pacers scored 45 points in the fourth quarter.

That was their best offensive quarter of the game by a wide margin.

Los Angeles still scored 32, which is a strong offensive output, but Indiana’s 45-point period cut deeply into the Lakers’ advantage.

The late sequence demonstrated the importance of game management.

Indiana continued applying pressure after falling behind by a large margin. Los Angeles then needed to make enough plays at the free-throw line and in half-court possessions to prevent the comeback from becoming a tie game.

James’ late free throws were part of the closing sequence described in the official game recap.

Where to Find the Official Box Score

Readers who want to verify individual minutes, shooting percentages, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, turnovers, and plus-minus figures can consult the official NBA game record.

For publication purposes, using the official league box score as the primary statistical reference is preferable to relying on social media graphics or unsourced stat summaries.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between the Lakers and Pacers?

The Los Angeles Lakers defeated the Indiana Pacers 137-130 at Gainbridge Fieldhouse.

Who led the Lakers in scoring?

Luka Doncic led all players with 43 points. He also recorded six rebounds and seven assists.

Who led the Pacers in scoring?

Pascal Siakam led Indiana with 20 points and also recorded eight rebounds.

How many assists did Andrew Nembhard have?

Andrew Nembhard recorded 19 assists, which was a career high according to the Pacers’ official game recap.

Did LeBron James record a triple-double?

No. James finished with 23 points, nine rebounds, and nine assists, leaving him one rebound and one assist short of a triple-double.

Which team made more three-pointers?

The Indiana Pacers made more three-pointers. Indiana converted 16 of 39 attempts, while Los Angeles made nine of 23.

Conclusion

The Lakers vs Pacers match player stats from this matchup show a game that was much closer in overall shooting efficiency than the final seven-point margin might suggest.

Los Angeles shot 56.2% from the field, Indiana shot 55.8%, and both offenses produced more than 130 points. The difference came from how each team generated and protected possessions.

Luka Doncic’s 43 points were the headline performance, while LeBron James contributed 23 points, nine rebounds, and nine assists. Austin Reaves added 25 points and eight assists, and Jaxson Hayes delivered 21 points and 10 rebounds.

Indiana had its own standout performances. Pascal Siakam led the team with 20 points, Jay Huff scored 18, T.J. McConnell added 17, and Andrew Nembhard created a career-high 19 assists.

The statistical contrast is particularly interesting. Indiana made 16 three-pointers and finished with 35 assists, but the Pacers also committed 18 turnovers. Los Angeles made only nine threes but produced 70 points in the paint, made 28 free throws, collected 39 rebounds, and recorded 15 steals.

The Lakers’ 45-28 opening quarter ultimately provided the cushion that mattered most. Indiana responded throughout the game and dominated the fourth quarter 45-32, but Los Angeles had already created enough separation to withstand the late push.

For anyone analyzing this matchup through individual statistics, the biggest lesson is that no single box-score category explains the result. Doncic’s scoring, James’ all-around production, Hayes’ interior efficiency, Nembhard’s playmaking, Indiana’s three-point shooting, and the turnover and free-throw differences all contributed to the final outcome.