Dallas Mavericks vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats
The dallas mavericks vs utah jazz match player stats from January 18, 2026, tell the story of a high-scoring game in which the Dallas Mavericks defeated the Utah Jazz 138-120 at American Airlines Center in Dallas, Texas. Dallas built its advantage early, scoring 42 points in the opening quarter, and maintained enough offensive pressure to finish with an 18-point victory.
The final score was Dallas Mavericks 138, Utah Jazz 120, but the box score shows more than just the difference on the scoreboard. Both teams shot 54 percent from the field, while Dallas created a clear separation through three-point shooting, ball movement, turnovers, and free-throw volume. Utah also had several strong individual performances, led by Keyonte George with 29 points and Brice Sensabaugh with 25 points and 8 assists.
For anyone researching dallas mavericks vs utah jazz match player stats, this game provides a useful example of how individual production and team-level efficiency can tell different parts of the same story. Utah produced 30 assists and shot 54 percent overall, yet Dallas generated 36 assists, made 18 three-pointers, and committed only 11 turnovers.
Game Overview
The matchup took place on January 18, 2026, at American Airlines Center in Dallas. The Mavericks entered the game with a 17-26 record and a 13-11 home record. Utah came into the contest at 14-28 overall and 5-16 on the road.
Dallas ultimately controlled the game from the opening minutes.
The Mavericks scored 42 points in the first quarter while Utah scored 29. That 13-point difference immediately created pressure for the Jazz, who spent the rest of the game trying to reduce the deficit.
Utah responded with 30 points in the second quarter, while Dallas added 29. The Jazz therefore gained one point on the Mavericks during the second period, but Dallas still entered halftime with a substantial advantage.
The third quarter was evenly matched at 35 points apiece. Utah then scored 26 points in the fourth quarter compared with 32 from Dallas.
Final Score by Quarter
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| Utah Jazz | 29 | 30 | 35 | 26 | 120 |
| Dallas Mavericks | 42 | 29 | 35 | 32 | 138 |
The quarter breakdown is important because Dallas did not need one dominant second-half period to win. Instead, its 42-point first quarter established the foundation for the victory.
Dallas Mavericks vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats: Key Numbers
The dallas mavericks vs utah jazz match player stats show that Dallas and Utah were surprisingly similar in several traditional shooting categories.
Both teams made 54 percent of their field-goal attempts. Utah converted 48 of 89 shots, while Dallas made 49 of 91.
The major difference came from beyond the three-point line.
Dallas made 18 of 41 three-point attempts, good for 44 percent. Utah made 10 of 31, or 32 percent.
That produced a significant scoring advantage from long range. Dallas made eight more three-pointers than Utah, and each made three-pointer is worth three points. That difference alone represents 24 additional points before considering any other scoring differences.
Team Statistical Comparison
| Statistic | Utah Jazz | Dallas Mavericks |
| Points | 120 | 138 |
| Field Goals | 48-89 | 49-91 |
| Field-Goal Percentage | 54% | 54% |
| Three-Pointers | 10-31 | 18-41 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 32% | 44% |
| Free Throws | 14-20 | 22-36 |
| Free-Throw Percentage | 70% | 61% |
| Rebounds | 41 | 44 |
| Assists | 30 | 36 |
| Turnovers | 15 | 11 |
| Steals | 5 | 8 |
| Blocks | 3 | 2 |
| Offensive Rebounds | 11 | 13 |
| Defensive Rebounds | 30 | 31 |
| Fouls | 27 | 18 |
The comparison demonstrates why field-goal percentage alone does not explain the result.
Both teams shot 54 percent overall, but Dallas had greater three-point efficiency and more three-point makes. Dallas also had more assists, more rebounds, more steals, fewer turnovers, and fewer fouls.
Keyonte George Leads Utah With 29 Points
Keyonte George was Utah’s leading scorer with 29 points.
His scoring output represented the biggest individual point total for the Jazz in the game. George’s production helped Utah reach 120 points despite falling behind significantly during the first quarter.
A 29-point performance is especially notable in a game where the opposing team scored 138 points. Utah needed sustained scoring to remain competitive, and George supplied a major portion of that production.
His performance should therefore be considered alongside Utah’s overall offensive efficiency. The Jazz finished with 48 made field goals and 30 assists, suggesting that their offense was capable of producing quality scoring opportunities.
The problem was not simply a lack of scoring.
Dallas produced even more offensive output while generating better results from three-point range.
Brice Sensabaugh Provides 25 Points and 8 Assists
Brice Sensabaugh was another major contributor for Utah.
He finished with 25 points and led the Jazz with 8 assists. That combination makes his performance one of the more complete individual contributions in the box score.
Scoring 25 points gave Utah another high-volume scoring option behind George. The 8 assists were equally important because they indicate that Sensabaugh was involved in creating opportunities for teammates rather than contributing only as a scorer.
Utah finished with 30 assists as a team. Sensabaugh’s 8 assists therefore accounted for a meaningful portion of the Jazz’s total playmaking production.
For readers examining player statistics, this is an important distinction. A player’s impact cannot always be understood through points alone. Assists provide additional context about how an offensive player contributed to team possessions.
Kyle Filipowski Controls the Glass for Utah
Kyle Filipowski led Utah with 12 rebounds.
The Jazz finished with 41 total rebounds, including 11 offensive rebounds and 30 defensive rebounds. Filipowski’s 12-rebound performance therefore represented a substantial individual contribution to Utah’s work on the glass.
Offensive rebounding is particularly valuable because it creates additional possessions after missed shots.
Utah’s 11 offensive rebounds show that the Jazz were able to extend some possessions and generate second opportunities. However, Dallas collected 13 offensive rebounds and 44 total rebounds, giving the Mavericks a modest overall rebounding advantage.
The rebounding numbers were not dramatically different, but Dallas consistently maintained a small edge.
Klay Thompson Leads Dallas With 23 Points
Klay Thompson led the Mavericks in scoring with 23 points.
His scoring total was lower than George’s 29-point performance, but Dallas did not rely on one player to carry the entire offensive load.
Instead, the Mavericks received substantial contributions from several players.
Thompson’s 23 points were part of a balanced scoring attack that also included 22 points from Brandon Williams and 22 points from Max Christie.
This distribution matters when analyzing the game because Dallas scored 138 points without needing a single player to approach 40 points.
The Mavericks’ offense was therefore built around multiple contributors.
Brandon Williams and Max Christie Add 22 Points Each
Brandon Williams scored 22 points, while Max Christie also scored 22.
Having two players produce 22 points each gave Dallas additional scoring depth behind Thompson.
Williams also finished among Dallas’ leaders in steals, recording 2. Christie likewise had 2 steals.
This combination of scoring and defensive activity added value on both sides of the floor.
Dallas scored 138 points as a team, meaning the Mavericks needed contributions from multiple players. Thompson, Williams, and Christie combined for 67 points, accounting for nearly half of Dallas’ final total.
That is a useful statistic for understanding the structure of the Mavericks’ offense.
Jeremiah Robinson-Earl Leads Dallas in Rebounds
Jeremiah Robinson-Earl finished as Dallas’ rebounding leader with 10 rebounds.
Dallas collected 44 rebounds overall, including 13 offensive rebounds and 31 defensive rebounds.
Robinson-Earl’s 10 rebounds were particularly important because Utah had its own strong rebounding performance from Filipowski.
The two teams were relatively close in total rebounding, with Dallas holding a three-rebound advantage.
This means rebounding was not the main reason for the 18-point difference. The more meaningful separation came from other categories, particularly three-point production and turnovers.
Naji Marshall Leads Dallas in Assists
Naji Marshall led Dallas with 6 assists.
The Mavericks finished with 36 assists, compared with 30 for Utah.
That six-assist team advantage provides evidence of Dallas’ stronger ball movement during the contest.
Assists do not automatically translate into victories, but they can help explain how a team creates efficient scoring opportunities. Dallas’ combination of 36 assists and 18 made three-pointers indicates that the Mavericks were able to generate a large amount of scoring through shared offensive possessions.
The six-assist advantage also fits the broader statistical picture. Dallas scored 138 points while shooting the same overall field-goal percentage as Utah.
Dallas Had a Major Three-Point Advantage
Three-point shooting was one of the clearest statistical differences in the game.
Dallas made 18 of 41 attempts from three-point range. Utah made 10 of 31.
| Three-Point Statistic | Utah | Dallas |
| Makes | 10 | 18 |
| Attempts | 31 | 41 |
| Percentage | 32% | 44% |
Dallas therefore made eight more three-pointers and attempted 10 more.
This is significant because three-point makes provide more scoring value than two-point field goals.
Dallas did not simply attempt more threes. The Mavericks also converted them at a higher rate.
Their 44 percent three-point shooting was 12 percentage points higher than Utah’s 32 percent.
This is arguably the most important statistical contrast in the game.
Free Throws Tell a Different Story
The free-throw numbers provide another interesting layer.
Utah made 14 of 20 free throws for 70 percent.
Dallas made 22 of 36 for 61 percent.
So Utah was more accurate at the free-throw line, but Dallas attempted 16 more free throws and made 8 more.
The Mavericks’ greater volume compensated for their lower percentage.
This is a useful reminder that shooting percentage and total scoring contribution are different measurements. A team can shoot a lower percentage from the line but still gain more points if it earns substantially more attempts.
Dallas scored 22 free-throw points compared with 14 for Utah.
Turnovers Favored Dallas
Dallas committed 11 turnovers, while Utah committed 15.
That four-turnover difference may appear small, but it matters in a game decided by 18 points.
Every lost possession can remove an opportunity to score and potentially create an opportunity for the opponent.
Dallas also recorded 8 steals compared with Utah’s 5.
The combination of fewer turnovers and more steals suggests that the Mavericks were more effective in the possession battle.
This does not mean every Dallas steal directly produced a score. Rather, the numbers show that Dallas finished with more defensive takeaways while protecting its own possessions better.
Rebounding Was Close
Rebounding was one of the more balanced categories.
Dallas had 44 rebounds.
Utah had 41.
The three-rebound difference was relatively small compared with the 18-point final margin.
Dallas also led in both offensive and defensive rebounding:
- Dallas offensive rebounds: 13
- Utah offensive rebounds: 11
- Dallas defensive rebounds: 31
- Utah defensive rebounds: 30
These numbers indicate that Dallas had a slight advantage on the glass, but it was not overwhelming.
The game was therefore not decided simply by second-chance opportunities.
Dallas Created a Faster Scoring Separation
The first quarter deserves special attention.
Dallas scored 42 points in the opening period, compared with Utah’s 29.
That 13-point advantage represented most of the eventual 18-point margin.
After the first quarter, the scoring was much closer.
Dallas scored 29 points in the second quarter and Utah scored 30.
Both teams scored 35 in the third.
Dallas then outscored Utah 32-26 in the fourth.
This quarter-by-quarter pattern shows that the Mavericks’ biggest advantage came at the beginning of the game rather than from a single late-game surge.
The First Quarter Changed the Game
A 42-point opening quarter creates several challenges for the trailing team.
Utah had to spend the remainder of the game attacking a deficit instead of playing from an even starting point.
The Jazz did respond offensively, especially in the third quarter when they scored 35 points. However, Dallas continued to score efficiently enough to prevent Utah from making the game close.
This is why quarter splits are valuable when studying player statistics. A final score tells you the outcome, but quarter-by-quarter data provides context about when the separation occurred.
Dallas’ Ball Movement Stood Out
The Mavericks finished with 36 assists.
Utah finished with 30.
The difference was six assists, or 20 percent more assists for Dallas compared with Utah.
That additional passing production fits with Dallas’ overall scoring output.
The Mavericks made 49 field goals and recorded 36 assists. While assists do not correspond one-to-one with field goals, the ratio illustrates how frequently made baskets were connected to team playmaking.
Naji Marshall led Dallas with 6 assists.
Brice Sensabaugh led Utah with 8 assists.
Interestingly, Utah’s leading individual assist total was higher than Dallas’ leading total, yet Dallas had more assists as a team.
That is another example of why team totals and individual totals should be considered separately.
Utah’s 120 Points Should Not Be Overlooked
The final score can make it easy to focus exclusively on Dallas’ offense.
However, Utah still scored 120 points.
The Jazz shot 54 percent from the field and made 48 shots.
Those numbers indicate that Utah was not completely ineffective offensively.
The Jazz also produced 30 assists and made 10 three-pointers.
The issue was that Dallas produced even more offensive efficiency and volume.
In other words, Utah’s 120-point output was strong in isolation, but Dallas’ 138-point performance set a much higher scoring standard.
What the Team Stats Reveal
When the major statistical categories are placed together, several patterns become clear.
1. Overall Shooting Was Equal
Both teams shot 54 percent from the field.
This means the final result cannot be explained simply by saying Dallas shot better overall.
2. Dallas Was Much Better From Three
Dallas made 18 threes at 44 percent.
Utah made 10 at 32 percent.
This was a major scoring advantage.
3. Dallas Created More Free-Throw Opportunities
Dallas attempted 36 free throws.
Utah attempted 20.
The Mavericks therefore had substantially more opportunities at the line.
4. Dallas Protected the Ball Better
Dallas had 11 turnovers.
Utah had 15.
Four additional turnovers gave Dallas a modest possession advantage.
5. Dallas Moved the Ball More
Dallas recorded 36 assists compared with Utah’s 30.
6. Rebounding Was Relatively Even
Dallas led 44-41.
The difference was not large enough to explain the entire result.
Previous Meetings and the Season Series
The January 18 matchup was part of a four-game season series between the Mavericks and Jazz.
According to the supplied game data, the series finished tied 2-2.
The four listed results were:
| Date | Result |
| December 16 | Dallas 140, Utah 133, OT |
| January 9 | Dallas 116, Utah 114 |
| January 16 | Utah 144, Dallas 122 |
| January 18 | Dallas 138, Utah 120 |
These games show how closely the teams competed across the season series.
The December meeting required overtime, while the January 9 matchup was decided by only two points. Utah then produced a 22-point victory on January 16 before Dallas responded with an 18-point victory on January 18.
That sequence provides useful context for the January 18 statistics.
The final game was not an isolated meeting. It was the fourth matchup between the teams during the season.
A Closer Look at the Scoring Leaders
The leading scorers from both teams demonstrate two different offensive structures.
Utah
- Keyonte George: 29 points
- Brice Sensabaugh: 25 points
George and Sensabaugh combined for 54 points.
Dallas
- Klay Thompson: 23 points
- Brandon Williams: 22 points
- Max Christie: 22 points
Those three Dallas players combined for 67 points.
This comparison illustrates Dallas’ broader distribution of scoring among its leading contributors.
Utah had two players above 25 points, while Dallas had three players between 22 and 23 points.
Neither approach is inherently better in every game, but in this matchup Dallas’ balanced production helped support its 138-point total.
Defensive Contributions
The box score also records defensive activity.
Utah finished with:
- 5 steals
- 3 blocks
Dallas finished with:
- 8 steals
- 2 blocks
Utah had one more block, while Dallas had three more steals.
Dallas’ advantage in steals is consistent with its lower turnover total and suggests a stronger overall result in disruptive defensive possessions.
Still, blocks and steals should not be interpreted in isolation. Defensive performance includes positioning, contests, communication, rebounding, and limiting efficient attempts, much of which is not captured fully by a traditional box score.
Fouls and Game Control
Dallas committed 18 fouls.
Utah committed 27.
That nine-foul difference is substantial.
It also helps explain why Dallas attempted more free throws. Fouls can give opponents additional scoring opportunities, particularly when they occur during shooting actions.
Utah’s higher foul total did not necessarily cause every difference in free-throw attempts, but the two statistics are connected enough to deserve attention.
Dallas’ lower foul total also suggests that the Mavericks avoided giving away as many opportunities at the line.
How to Read Player Stats Beyond Points
Readers often begin with points when researching a box score, but a more complete approach is to examine several categories together.
For example, Brice Sensabaugh’s 25 points become more informative when combined with his 8 assists.
Kyle Filipowski’s 12 rebounds provide more context when compared with Utah’s 41 total rebounds.
Klay Thompson’s 23 points are more meaningful when viewed alongside Dallas’ 138 total points and the 22-point performances from Brandon Williams and Max Christie.
Jeremiah Robinson-Earl’s 10 rebounds matter because Dallas had 44 rebounds as a team.
This approach prevents the common mistake of treating one statistic as a complete measure of a player’s contribution.
Why the Exact Box Score Matters
Searchers looking for dallas mavericks vs utah jazz match player stats may want different information depending on their purpose.
Some readers want the leading scorer.
Others are interested in rebounds or assists.
Fantasy basketball readers may be looking for individual production.
Sports writers may need team comparisons.
Fans may simply want to understand why one team won.
A useful box-score analysis should therefore make all of these perspectives accessible without forcing readers to search through multiple pages.
The January 18 game provides enough statistical information to understand the main story directly.
Dallas won because it combined a huge first quarter with stronger three-point shooting, more assists, fewer turnovers, more steals, slightly better rebounding, and substantially more free-throw attempts.
Utah still produced 120 points and shot 54 percent from the field, but Dallas generated enough additional scoring opportunities to create the final 18-point difference.
Dallas Mavericks vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats: Quick Reference
For readers who want the most important information in one place, here is a condensed summary.
| Category | Utah Jazz | Dallas Mavericks |
| Final Score | 120 | 138 |
| Leading Scorer | Keyonte George, 29 | Klay Thompson, 23 |
| Second Key Scorer | Brice Sensabaugh, 25 | Brandon Williams, 22 |
| Another Key Scorer | Kyle Filipowski, 12 rebounds | Max Christie, 22 |
| Leading Rebounder | Kyle Filipowski, 12 | Jeremiah Robinson-Earl, 10 |
| Leading Assists | Brice Sensabaugh, 8 | Naji Marshall, 6 |
| Field Goal % | 54% | 54% |
| Three-Point % | 32% | 44% |
| Rebounds | 41 | 44 |
| Assists | 30 | 36 |
| Turnovers | 15 | 11 |
| Steals | 5 | 8 |
| Blocks | 3 | 2 |
What Stands Out Most From the Box Score?
The strongest takeaway is that Dallas did not need superior overall field-goal accuracy to win.
Both teams shot 54 percent.
Instead, Dallas separated itself through the composition of its offense.
The Mavericks made eight more three-pointers, attempted 10 more threes, made eight more free throws, and produced six more assists.
At the same time, Dallas committed four fewer turnovers and recorded three more steals.
The combination of these smaller advantages created a much larger difference on the scoreboard.
This is one of the most useful lessons from the game for anyone learning how to interpret basketball statistics. A team’s advantage can emerge from several categories simultaneously rather than from one spectacular statistical difference.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the top scorer in the Dallas Mavericks vs Utah Jazz game?
Keyonte George was Utah’s leading scorer with 29 points. Klay Thompson led Dallas with 23 points.
What was the final score of the game?
The Dallas Mavericks defeated the Utah Jazz 138-120 on January 18, 2026, at American Airlines Center.
Who led the Jazz in rebounds?
Kyle Filipowski led Utah with 12 rebounds.
Who led the Mavericks in rebounds?
Jeremiah Robinson-Earl was Dallas’ leading rebounder with 10 rebounds.
Which team shot better from three-point range?
Dallas shot 44 percent from three-point range, making 18 of 41 attempts. Utah shot 32 percent, making 10 of 31.
How many assists did each team record?
Dallas recorded 36 assists, while Utah recorded 30 assists.
Conclusion
The dallas mavericks vs utah jazz match player stats from January 18, 2026, provide a detailed picture of how Dallas secured a 138-120 victory.
Utah received strong individual scoring from Keyonte George and Brice Sensabaugh, while Kyle Filipowski controlled the rebounding category. The Jazz also shot 54 percent from the field and produced 120 points.
Dallas answered with a more balanced offensive attack. Klay Thompson led the team with 23 points, while Brandon Williams and Max Christie each added 22. Jeremiah Robinson-Earl led the Mavericks in rebounds, and Naji Marshall finished as their assist leader.
The largest statistical separation came from three-point shooting. Dallas made 18 three-pointers at a 44 percent rate compared with Utah’s 10 at 32 percent. Dallas also recorded more assists, rebounds, steals, and free throws while committing fewer turnovers and fouling less often.
The 42-29 first quarter was another defining part of the game. Dallas established a substantial early advantage and maintained enough offensive production through the remaining three quarters to preserve the victory.
Looking at the complete box score rather than only the final score or leading scorer gives a clearer understanding of the matchup. The game was shaped by several connected factors, with Dallas’ perimeter shooting and overall possession management standing out among the most important statistical details.
