San Antonio Spurs vs Denver Nuggets Match Player Stats

The san antonio spurs vs denver nuggets match player stats from the March 2026 meeting tell the story of one of the most dramatic comebacks of the season. Denver defeated San Antonio 136-131 at Frost Bank Center after the Spurs built a 20-point lead. Jamal Murray led all scorers with 39 points, while Nikola Jokic produced a remarkable 31-point, 20-rebound, 12-assist triple-double. For San Antonio, Stephon Castle answered with 30 points, 11 rebounds and 10 assists, giving the Spurs a major individual performance despite the loss. The official NBA game record confirms the final score and the statistical profile of the contest.

This was more than a simple high-scoring game. San Antonio controlled the first half, Denver responded with a huge third quarter, and the Nuggets then completely flipped the game in the fourth. The final quarter ended 42-25 in Denver’s favor, turning a game that appeared to belong to the Spurs into a five-point Nuggets victory.

For readers looking for the san antonio spurs vs denver nuggets match player stats, this breakdown covers the complete player production, team numbers, key turning points, efficiency differences and the individual performances that actually shaped the result.

San Antonio Spurs vs Denver Nuggets Match Player Stats

The game was played at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio, Texas, with an announced attendance of 19,038. The NBA’s official game record lists the contest as Thursday, March 12, 2026, while its game information section displays Friday, March 13 in the event’s local listing. This difference is consistent with a game that crossed midnight in some time references, so the safest identification is the March 12/13, 2026 meeting between the Nuggets and Spurs.

Denver entered the game at 41-26 overall and 23-13 on the road according to the supplied matchup data. San Antonio entered at 48-18 and 25-7 at home. Those records make the result particularly notable because Denver won in San Antonio despite the Spurs’ strong home record.

Final Score

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Final
Denver Nuggets	25	28	41	42	136
San Antonio Spurs	37	32	37	25	131

San Antonio led 37-25 after the opening quarter and extended that advantage to 69-53 at halftime. Denver then scored 41 points in the third quarter and 42 in the fourth to complete the comeback. The official NBA game page confirms that Denver overcame a 20-point deficit.

Denver Nuggets Player Stats

Denver’s victory was driven by a combination of elite production from its stars and efficient contributions from its supporting players.

Nikola Jokic: 31 Points, 20 Rebounds, 12 Assists

Nikola Jokic was the central figure in Denver’s statistical response.

He finished with:

• 31 points
• 20 rebounds
• 12 assists
• 39 minutes
• 11 field goals made on 21 attempts
• 1 three-pointer on 4 attempts
• 8 free throws on 8 attempts

That performance gave Jokic a triple-double while also making him the game’s leading rebounder and leading assist provider. The official box score confirms the 31-20-12 line.

The most important aspect of Jokic’s performance was not simply the number of points. His 20 rebounds helped Denver control the defensive glass, while his 12 assists reflected how much of the Nuggets’ offense moved through him.

Jokic also helped Denver survive a first half in which San Antonio appeared to have control. His ability to create offense without needing every possession to end in a shot was important against a Spurs team that recorded 34 assists.

Jamal Murray: 39 Points

Jamal Murray was Denver’s leading scorer and the highest-scoring player on either team.

His final line was:

• 39 points
• 40 minutes
• 13 field goals made on 24 attempts
• 3 three-pointers on 8 attempts
• 10 free throws made on 10 attempts
• 2 rebounds
• 7 assists

The 39 points were especially important because Murray became the primary scoring force during Denver’s comeback. The NBA’s recap notes that his three-pointer with 4:38 remaining gave Denver its first lead at 121-119, after which the Nuggets went on an 11-0 run.

That sequence illustrates why raw scoring totals can sometimes miss the most important part of a player’s performance. Murray’s production was not evenly distributed across the game. His late-game scoring arrived when Denver needed to convert a comeback into a win.

Spencer Jones: 19 Points

Spencer Jones supplied an important secondary scoring performance.

He recorded:

• 19 points
• 32:47 minutes
• 8-of-13 shooting
• 3-of-6 from three-point range
• 4 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 2 steals
• 2 blocks

His 61.5% field-goal percentage was one of the strongest shooting performances among Denver’s regular contributors. The official box score also credits Jones with a +14 plus-minus, the best mark among Denver’s listed players.

That combination of efficient shooting and positive impact made Jones more than a simple supporting scorer.

Cameron Johnson: 15 Points

Cameron Johnson scored 15 points in 30:48 minutes.

He shot 6-of-8 from the field and 1-of-2 from three-point range. He also grabbed five rebounds and finished with a +8 plus-minus.

His 75% field-goal shooting was particularly useful because Denver needed efficient offense while trying to erase San Antonio’s early advantage.

Christian Braun: 11 Points, 9 Rebounds

Christian Braun produced a balanced line:

• 11 points
• 9 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 38 minutes

Braun did not need to be Denver’s primary scorer. His nine rebounds and heavy workload helped support the Nuggets’ stars, particularly during the second half.

Denver’s Remaining Player Production

The rest of Denver’s rotation contributed as follows:

Player	Minutes	Points	Rebounds	Assists
Cameron Johnson	31	15	5	1
Spencer Jones	33	19	4	2
Nikola Jokic	39	31	20	12
Jamal Murray	40	39	2	7
Christian Braun	38	11	9	2
Jonas Valanciunas	5	4	2	1
Tim Hardaway Jr.	19	1	2	1
Tyus Jones	3	0	0	0
Bruce Brown	17	6	1	0
Julian Strawther	15	10	2	1

The official NBA box score provides the detailed shooting, rebounding, assist, defensive and plus-minus information behind these totals.

San Antonio Spurs Player Stats

San Antonio produced several outstanding individual performances, but its fourth-quarter offensive decline ultimately prevented the team from protecting its lead.

Stephon Castle: 30 Points, 11 Rebounds, 10 Assists

Stephon Castle was the standout player for San Antonio.

His final line was:

• 30 points
• 11 rebounds
• 10 assists
• 35 minutes
• 30 points on 12-of-21 shooting
• 3-of-7 from three-point range
• 3-of-4 at the free-throw line

Castle recorded his third career triple-double, according to the NBA’s game recap.

The importance of Castle’s performance becomes clearer when the game is viewed from San Antonio’s perspective. The Spurs were without Victor Wembanyama, and Castle responded by taking on a major share of the team’s scoring, rebounding and playmaking responsibilities.

His 30-11-10 line shows that San Antonio still had a primary creator capable of producing at an elite level without Wembanyama on the floor.

De’Aaron Fox: 27 Points, 9 Assists

De’Aaron Fox added 27 points and nine assists in 36 minutes.

His scoring gave San Antonio another high-level offensive option alongside Castle. Nine assists also show that his contribution was not limited to scoring.

The combination of Fox and Castle gave the Spurs two players capable of creating offense. That helped explain how San Antonio reached 131 points despite eventually losing the game.

Harrison Barnes: 20 Points, 7 Rebounds

Harrison Barnes scored 20 points, grabbed seven rebounds and added one assist.

He shot 6-of-10 from the field, including 2-of-5 from three-point range, and converted six of seven free throws.

Barnes’ efficiency was valuable because San Antonio needed reliable scoring beyond Castle and Fox.

Devin Vassell: 18 Points

Devin Vassell scored 18 points in 32 minutes.

He also contributed three assists and one rebound. His scoring gave San Antonio another perimeter threat, particularly during the strong opening half.

Dylan Harper: 13 Points, 5 Rebounds, 5 Assists

Dylan Harper produced a useful all-around performance with:

• 13 points
• 5 rebounds
• 5 assists
• 24 minutes

His five assists were particularly relevant on a Spurs team that finished with 34 total assists.

Carter Bryant: 10 Points in Limited Minutes

Carter Bryant scored 10 points in only nine minutes.

He shot 4-of-6 from the field and 1-of-2 from three-point range. That made his scoring output one of the most efficient short-minute contributions on the San Antonio side.

San Antonio’s Remaining Player Production

Player	Minutes	Points	Rebounds	Assists
Julian Champagnie	23	8	7	1
Luke Kornet	25	0	3	0
De’Aaron Fox	36	27	3	9
Devin Vassell	32	18	1	3
Stephon Castle	35	30	11	10
Harrison Barnes	27	20	7	1
Keldon Johnson	22	5	7	3
Carter Bryant	9	10	3	1
Mason Plumlee	8	0	2	1
Dylan Harper	24	13	5	5

The complete official box score provides the underlying shooting and defensive figures for the Spurs rotation.

Team Statistics That Decided the Game

Looking only at points can make the result seem surprising. San Antonio shot 40.4% from three-point range compared with Denver’s 33.3%, collected two more rebounds and recorded seven more assists.

Yet Denver won.

The explanation is found in several other areas.

Field-Goal Efficiency

Denver shot:

• 44-of-88 overall
• 50.0% from the field
• 12-of-36 from three
• 33.3% from three

San Antonio shot:

• 43-of-95 overall
• 45.3% from the field
• 19-of-47 from three
• 40.4% from three

The Spurs attempted seven more field goals but made only one fewer basket.

That is an important distinction. San Antonio had more volume, but Denver was more efficient overall.

Free-Throw Shooting

This was one of the clearest statistical advantages for Denver.

The Nuggets went 36-of-38 from the free-throw line, or 94.7%.

The Spurs went 26-of-32, or 81.3%.

That produced a 10-point difference in made free throws.

In a five-point game, that margin is enormous.

Denver’s ability to convert nearly every free-throw opportunity gave the team a significant scoring advantage even though San Antonio had the better three-point percentage.

Rebounding

San Antonio actually won the total rebounding battle:

• San Antonio: 49
• Denver: 47

The Spurs also collected 12 offensive rebounds compared with seven for Denver.

At first glance, that suggests a clear San Antonio advantage. However, Denver’s 40 defensive rebounds helped limit the damage from missed shots and allowed the Nuggets to finish defensive possessions.

Jokic’s 20 rebounds were especially important in that context.

Assists

San Antonio recorded 34 assists compared with Denver’s 27.

That is another area where the Spurs had the statistical advantage.

Castle’s 10 assists and Fox’s nine assists accounted for 19 of San Antonio’s 34 assists.

Denver’s assists were more concentrated around Jokic and Murray, who combined for 19 assists.

The difference was not that one team passed the ball and the other did not. Both teams generated significant playmaking. The more important distinction was how efficiently Denver converted its possessions late in the game.

Turnovers

Both teams committed 10 turnovers.

This is another reason the game was decided elsewhere.

Neither side created a meaningful advantage through ball security. Instead, shooting efficiency, free throws and the fourth-quarter scoring explosion became more decisive.

Why Denver Won Despite Falling Behind by 20

The most interesting part of these san antonio spurs vs denver nuggets match player stats is the change in scoring distribution.

San Antonio scored 37 points in the first quarter and 32 in the second.

Denver scored only 25 and 28.

That created a 16-point halftime deficit.

But Denver did not simply chip away at the lead.

The Nuggets scored 41 points in the third quarter.

Then they scored 42 in the fourth.

That means Denver produced 83 points after halftime.

San Antonio scored 62 over the same span.

That 21-point second-half scoring advantage was enough to erase the deficit and produce a five-point victory.

The NBA’s official recap describes Denver’s fourth-quarter surge as the key to the comeback, with Murray, Jokic, Spencer Jones, Cameron Johnson and Christian Braun all contributing.

The Fourth Quarter Was the Turning Point

San Antonio entered the final period with a 106-94 lead.

A 12-point advantage with only 12 minutes remaining normally puts a team in a strong position.

Instead, Denver outscored San Antonio 42-25.

That is a 17-point swing in one quarter.

Murray’s late-game scoring was central to that reversal. His three-pointer with 4:38 remaining gave Denver its first lead at 121-119. The Nuggets then went on an 11-0 run.

San Antonio still had opportunities.

With the Spurs trailing 132-129, Castle attempted a three-pointer with 20 seconds left, but the shot rattled out. Murray then closed the game with four consecutive free throws.

This sequence captures the game perfectly.

San Antonio had enough offensive talent to remain competitive, but Denver was more effective in the decisive possessions.

Comparing the Biggest Individual Performances

Three players stand out immediately when comparing the box score.

Jamal Murray vs. Stephon Castle

Murray won the scoring battle 39-30.

Castle won the rebounding battle 11-2 and the assist battle 10-7.

That means Castle produced the more balanced statistical line, while Murray supplied the larger scoring burden.

Castle also recorded a triple-double.

Still, Murray’s late scoring made his performance especially influential to the final result.

Nikola Jokic vs. Stephon Castle

This is perhaps the most interesting statistical comparison.

Jokic:

• 31 points
• 20 rebounds
• 12 assists

Castle:

• 30 points
• 11 rebounds
• 10 assists

Castle was just one point behind Jokic while recording a triple-double of his own.

Jokic, however, dominated the rebounding category and finished with two more assists.

The difference was not simply individual talent. Jokic’s rebounding and playmaking helped Denver control the game as it shifted toward the Nuggets in the second half.

Murray vs. Jokic

Murray scored eight more points than Jokic.

Jokic collected 18 more rebounds and five more assists than Murray.

Their roles were complementary rather than identical.

Murray was the primary scoring closer.

Jokic was the central all-around engine.

That combination is a major reason Denver was able to recover from such a large deficit.

San Antonio’s Offense Was Not the Problem

It would be easy to describe the Spurs’ loss as an offensive failure because they lost a game in which they led by 20.

The numbers do not support that conclusion.

San Antonio scored 131 points.

The team made 19 three-pointers.

The Spurs recorded 34 assists.

They grabbed 49 rebounds.

They committed only 10 turnovers.

Those are not poor offensive numbers.

The bigger issue was the dramatic drop in fourth-quarter scoring.

San Antonio scored 25 points in the final period after producing at least 32 points in each of the first three quarters.

That decline coincided with Denver’s strongest defensive and offensive stretch.

Denver’s Supporting Cast Deserves More Attention

Murray and Jokic naturally dominate the headlines, but Denver’s comeback was not created by two players alone.

Spencer Jones scored 19 points on 8-of-13 shooting.

Cameron Johnson scored 15 on 6-of-8 shooting.

Christian Braun scored 11 and grabbed nine rebounds.

Julian Strawther added 10 points.

Bruce Brown contributed six points.

Those performances mattered because San Antonio could not focus exclusively on Murray and Jokic.

When secondary players convert open opportunities efficiently, double-teaming or overloading against the stars becomes more difficult.

Denver’s 50% overall field-goal shooting demonstrates that the Nuggets were not relying entirely on difficult isolation shots from their two leading scorers.

San Antonio’s Depth Also Produced Useful Numbers

The Spurs had a similar story.

Castle and Fox carried major playmaking responsibility, but Barnes scored 20, Vassell scored 18 and Harper scored 13.

Carter Bryant added 10 points in only nine minutes.

The Spurs therefore had several players producing meaningful offensive numbers.

The issue was not a complete lack of secondary scoring.

Instead, Denver’s fourth-quarter surge arrived at the worst possible time for San Antonio.

What the Game Says About Shot Quality

The shooting percentages offer an important lesson.

San Antonio was the better three-point shooting team:

40.4% vs. 33.3%.

But Denver was the better overall shooting team:

50.0% vs. 45.3%.

The Nuggets also converted 94.7% of their free throws.

This means San Antonio’s three-point advantage did not compensate for Denver’s overall field-goal efficiency and free-throw accuracy.

For analysts, that is an important distinction. A team can shoot better from three and still lose because the overall possession profile favors its opponent.

What the Game Says About Late-Game Execution

The scoreline also highlights the value of execution.

Denver entered the fourth quarter trailing by 12.

Instead of rushing possessions, the Nuggets steadily increased their scoring output.

Murray eventually gave Denver its first lead.

Then the Nuggets protected that lead through free throws.

San Antonio’s final missed three-point attempt from Castle was a high-leverage moment, while Murray’s four free throws afterward effectively closed the contest.

That is the difference between a comeback and a near-comeback.

Denver did not merely erase the deficit. It executed the final possessions well enough to prevent San Antonio from recovering.

The Absence of Victor Wembanyama

Any discussion of this game needs to acknowledge the biggest lineup factor.

Victor Wembanyama did not play because of right ankle soreness. The NBA’s game recap reported that he was ruled out after going through pregame warmups.

That does not diminish San Antonio’s performance.

Castle still produced a 30-point triple-double.

Fox scored 27.

Barnes scored 20.

Vassell scored 18.

But Wembanyama’s absence changed the structure of the Spurs’ offense and defense.

The Spurs still built a huge lead, but Denver’s ability to attack and eventually control the game became more difficult for San Antonio to counter without its elite interior presence.

A Closer Look at the Team Shooting Battle

Statistic	Denver	San Antonio
Field Goals	44-88	43-95
FG%	50.0%	45.3%
3PT	12-36	19-47
3PT%	33.3%	40.4%
Free Throws	36-38	26-32
FT%	94.7%	81.3%
Rebounds	47	49
Assists	27	34
Turnovers	10	10
Steals	8	8
Blocks	4	4
Personal Fouls	20	25

The official box score confirms these team totals.

The table shows why this was not a straightforward statistical matchup.

San Antonio won or tied several categories.

Denver won the most consequential scoring-efficiency categories.

What Fantasy Basketball Managers Can Take From the Box Score

Although one game should never be treated as a complete projection of future performance, the box score provides useful context for fantasy analysis.

Jokic’s 31-20-12 performance demonstrates elite production across three major categories.

Castle’s 30-11-10 line is similarly valuable because it combines scoring, rebounding and playmaking.

Murray’s 39 points show his scoring ceiling, especially when Denver needs perimeter offense.

Fox’s 27 points and nine assists highlight his dual scoring and playmaking role.

The supporting players also demonstrate why minutes matter. Jones produced 19 points in nearly 33 minutes, while Bryant scored 10 points in only nine minutes. Efficiency and playing time must therefore be considered together rather than judged from points alone.

What the Box Score Says About Both Teams

The san antonio spurs vs denver nuggets match player stats reveal two teams with very different paths to offensive success.

San Antonio generated more assists, more rebounds and more three-pointers.

Denver generated superior overall field-goal efficiency and dramatically better free-throw shooting.

The Nuggets also received an extraordinary combination from Jokic and Murray.

Together they scored 70 points, collected 22 rebounds and recorded 19 assists.

That is an enormous share of Denver’s offensive creation.

For San Antonio, Castle and Fox combined for 57 points and 19 assists.

The similarity is striking.

Both teams relied heavily on two primary creators.

The difference was that Denver’s two stars had more support from efficient second-unit and complementary production during the comeback.

Why the Game Was Statistically Close Despite a Huge Swing

A 20-point deficit suggests that one team dominated for a long stretch.

But the final statistics show a much closer contest.

Denver finished with 136 points.

San Antonio finished with 131.

Denver shot 50%.

San Antonio shot 45.3%.

San Antonio made 19 threes.

Denver made 12.

San Antonio had 49 rebounds.

Denver had 47.

• Both teams had 10 turnovers.
• Both teams recorded eight steals.
• Both teams recorded four blocks.

This was therefore not a game decided by one overwhelming statistical category.

It was a game decided by the timing of those numbers.

San Antonio’s advantages were strongest early.

Denver’s advantages became strongest late.

That distinction is one of the most important lessons from this matchup.

Season Series Context

The matchup section supplied with the game data lists the season series as tied 1-1.

That adds another layer to the result.

Rather than one team completely dominating the season matchup, the two games produced a split.

For evaluating future meetings, the individual performances are therefore more useful than simply looking at the season-series record.

Jokic’s ability to control the glass, Murray’s scoring, Castle’s development as a creator and San Antonio’s perimeter shooting are all factors worth monitoring in future matchups.

Where to Find the Official Box Score

For readers who want to verify individual shooting percentages, minutes, plus-minus figures and other details, the official NBA box score is the most authoritative reference for this game.

Using the official game record is especially important when comparing player statistics because secondary websites can sometimes display different date formats or incomplete rotation information.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who scored the most points in the Spurs vs Nuggets game?

Jamal Murray was the game’s leading scorer with 39 points for Denver. Stephon Castle led San Antonio with 30 points.

What were Nikola Jokic’s stats against the Spurs?

Nikola Jokic finished with 31 points, 20 rebounds and 12 assists in 39 minutes.

Did Stephon Castle record a triple-double?

Yes. Stephon Castle recorded 30 points, 11 rebounds and 10 assists, giving him the third triple-double of his career according to the NBA game recap.

What was the final score between Denver and San Antonio?

Denver defeated San Antonio 136-131 at Frost Bank Center.

How did Denver come back from a 20-point deficit?

Denver dramatically improved its scoring after halftime, scoring 41 points in the third quarter and 42 in the fourth. Jamal Murray’s late scoring and Denver’s fourth-quarter execution completed the comeback.

Why did San Antonio lose despite shooting better from three?

San Antonio shot 40.4% from three compared with Denver’s 33.3%, but Denver shot better overall from the field and made 36 of 38 free throws. The Nuggets also received 70 combined points from Jokic and Murray.

Conclusion

The san antonio spurs vs denver nuggets match player stats show how a game can change completely without either team having a disastrous overall box score.

San Antonio had a strong statistical foundation. The Spurs shot 40.4% from three, grabbed 49 rebounds and recorded 34 assists. Stephon Castle delivered a 30-point triple-double, De’Aaron Fox scored 27 points, Harrison Barnes added 20 and Devin Vassell contributed 18.

Denver simply became better when the game reached its most important stage.

Jamal Murray’s 39 points provided the scoring punch. Nikola Jokic added 31 points, 20 rebounds and 12 assists. Spencer Jones scored 19 on efficient shooting, while Cameron Johnson and Christian Braun supplied valuable secondary production.

The biggest number may be the fourth quarter.

Denver scored 42 points.

San Antonio scored 25.

That 17-point difference erased a double-digit deficit and turned a Spurs-controlled game into a Nuggets victory.

The matchup is therefore best understood not as a story of one team dominating from start to finish, but as a lesson in efficiency, star creation, late-game execution and momentum. San Antonio produced enough offense to win many games, but Denver’s combination of Jokic’s all-around control and Murray’s late scoring proved decisive.

The final san antonio spurs vs denver nuggets match player stats ultimately reflect a contest in which individual brilliance existed on both sides, but Denver executed better when the result was still in doubt.