Bengals vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats
The bengals vs baltimore ravens match player stats from the November 27, 2025 Thanksgiving matchup tell a much deeper story than the 32-14 final score alone. Cincinnati defeated Baltimore at M&T Bank Stadium by combining timely quarterback play, five forced turnovers, six field goals from Evan McPherson, and a second-half offensive surge. Joe Burrow returned from a long absence and finished with 261 passing yards and two touchdowns, while Ja’Marr Chase led all Bengals receivers with 110 yards. Baltimore produced 346 total yards, but its five turnovers, including four lost fumbles and one interception, repeatedly ended promising possessions.
Game Overview
The Bengals entered the contest at 3-8 and the Ravens at 6-5 according to the game context, with both teams needing a strong result in the AFC North race. Cincinnati ultimately moved to 4-8, while Baltimore fell to 6-6 after the 32-14 defeat. The game was played at M&T Bank Stadium, and the Bengals controlled the scoreboard after falling behind 7-3 in the first quarter.
The scoring pattern is especially important when evaluating the player numbers.
| Quarter | Cincinnati Bengals | Baltimore Ravens |
| 1st | 3 | 7 |
| 2nd | 9 | 0 |
| 3rd | 14 | 7 |
| 4th | 6 | 0 |
| Final | 32 | 14 |
Cincinnati did not immediately dominate offensively. In fact, the Bengals went into halftime without a touchdown and relied heavily on Evan McPherson’s kicking performance. They then scored 20 points after halftime and pulled away from Baltimore. NFL’s official recap also highlighted that Burrow’s return became more effective as the game progressed.
That progression matters because raw yardage does not completely explain this game. Baltimore averaged more yards per play than Cincinnati, 6.1 to 4.8, yet the Ravens lost by 18 points. Cincinnati ran 80 offensive plays compared with Baltimore’s 57 and held the ball for 38:46. Those additional possessions and the turnover difference were decisive.
Bengals vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats
The most useful way to read this matchup is to separate passing, rushing, receiving, defense, turnovers, and special teams. Looking at only the quarterbacks or leading receivers would miss several of the biggest reasons Cincinnati won.
Joe Burrow’s Return Was Central to Cincinnati’s Win
Joe Burrow completed 24 of 46 passes for 261 yards, averaging 5.7 yards per attempt. He threw two touchdowns and no interceptions while being sacked once for seven yards. His ESPN passer rating was 83.7, with a 53.9 QBR.
The completion percentage was 52.2%, so this was not an overwhelmingly efficient passing performance by traditional standards. Burrow also attempted 46 passes, meaning Cincinnati asked him to throw frequently.
What made the performance valuable was his ability to avoid the turnover that Baltimore could not avoid.
Burrow’s two touchdown passes both arrived in the second half. He connected with Tanner Hudson for a 14-yard touchdown in the third quarter and Andrei Iosivas for a 29-yard touchdown later in the same quarter.
That second-half improvement is one of the clearest insights in the game. Burrow was returning after missing nine games with a toe injury, and the early portion of the contest naturally involved some rust. NFL’s coverage noted that he appeared to settle into a rhythm as the game developed.
For someone studying the box score, the important takeaway is not simply “Burrow threw for 261 yards.” The more meaningful observation is that he produced 261 yards without throwing an interception while his defense repeatedly created extra opportunities.
Lamar Jackson’s Numbers Were Productive in Yardage but Costly in Possessions
Lamar Jackson completed 17 of 32 passes for 246 yards, averaging 7.7 yards per attempt. He did not throw a touchdown and was intercepted once. He was also sacked three times for a combined loss of 23 yards. His ESPN rating was 65.4 and his QBR was 21.3.
On the surface, Jackson’s 246 passing yards and 7.7 yards per attempt look respectable. The problem was what happened when Baltimore needed to turn those yards into points.
Jackson’s interception came on a pass that was deflected and picked off by rookie linebacker Demetrius Knight Jr. Knight returned the interception 39 yards, giving Cincinnati another short-field opportunity. NFL’s official game summary specifically identified the interception as a key moment in the fourth quarter.
Jackson also lost two fumbles. Those turnovers were part of Baltimore’s total of five giveaways.
This is why quarterback evaluation in a single game should not stop at passing yards. Jackson generated explosive yardage, but Cincinnati consistently converted Baltimore mistakes into opportunities.
Cincinnati Rushing Performance
Cincinnati finished with 33 rushing attempts for 128 yards, averaging 3.9 yards per carry. The Bengals did not score a rushing touchdown, but their ground game helped them maintain possession and support the passing attack.
Chase Brown
Chase Brown was Cincinnati’s leading rusher:
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Chase Brown | 15 | 78 | 5.2 | 0 | 18 |
| Samaje Perine | 14 | 39 | 2.8 | 0 | 12 |
| Joe Burrow | 3 | 8 | 2.7 | 0 | 3 |
| Drew Sample | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 |
| Team | 33 | 128 | 3.9 | 0 | 18 |
Brown’s 78 rushing yards were particularly important because he also contributed 35 receiving yards on seven catches. That gave him 113 yards from scrimmage.
NFL’s official game summary noted that Brown had surpassed 100 yards from scrimmage for a sixth consecutive game, making his all-around contribution more significant than his rushing total alone.
Samaje Perine
Perine carried the ball 14 times for 39 yards, averaging 2.8 yards per carry. He also caught two passes for 15 yards.
His offensive workload was substantial, but his biggest negative moment came when he lost a fumble. Cincinnati still controlled the game because the Bengals defense generated more turnovers than the offense surrendered.
That contrast is important. A team can survive one lost possession when its defense consistently wins the turnover battle. It becomes much harder when both sides of the ball are making mistakes.
Baltimore Rushing Performance
Baltimore ran the ball 22 times for 123 yards, averaging 5.6 yards per carry. The Ravens scored two rushing touchdowns, one by Derrick Henry and one by Keaton Mitchell.
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD | Long |
| Derrick Henry | 10 | 60 | 6.0 | 1 | 28 |
| Lamar Jackson | 6 | 27 | 4.5 | 0 | 11 |
| Keaton Mitchell | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 1 | 18 |
| Rasheen Ali | 4 | 17 | 4.3 | 0 | 9 |
| Team | 22 | 123 | 5.6 | 2 | 28 |
The rushing numbers reveal something unusual. Baltimore averaged 5.6 yards per carry, substantially better than Cincinnati’s 3.9, but still lost by 18 points.
That tells us the game was not decided simply by rushing efficiency.
Derrick Henry
Henry carried 10 times for 60 yards and a touchdown. His 28-yard touchdown run gave Baltimore its only first-quarter touchdown and helped the Ravens take an early 7-3 lead.
Henry also caught one pass for 44 yards, giving him 104 total yards from scrimmage.
That 44-yard reception was Baltimore’s longest receiving play of the night and showed how dangerous Henry remained when the Ravens found space for him in the passing game.
Keaton Mitchell
Mitchell carried twice for 19 yards and scored on an 18-yard run in the third quarter. He also caught two passes for 12 yards.
His 18-yard touchdown temporarily reduced Cincinnati’s lead to 19-14, but the Bengals answered with another touchdown before the end of the third quarter.
That response was a major turning point.
Cincinnati Receiving Stats
Ja’Marr Chase was the clear receiving leader for Cincinnati.
| Receiver | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Long | Targets |
| Ja’Marr Chase | 7 | 110 | 15.7 | 0 | 43 | 14 |
| Chase Brown | 7 | 35 | 5.0 | 0 | 9 | 7 |
| Andrei Iosivas | 1 | 29 | 29.0 | 1 | 29 | 2 |
| Mitchell Tinsley | 2 | 22 | 11.0 | 0 | 14 | 9 |
| Mike Gesicki | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 0 | 11 | 4 |
| Samaje Perine | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 0 | 9 | 2 |
| Tanner Hudson | 1 | 14 | 14.0 | 1 | 14 | 2 |
| Drew Sample | 1 | 14 | 14.0 | 0 | 14 | 2 |
| Noah Fant | 1 | 3 | 3.0 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
| Team | 24 | 261 | 10.9 | 2 | 43 | 44 |
Ja’Marr Chase
Chase caught seven passes for 110 yards on 14 targets. His 43-yard reception was Cincinnati’s longest completion.
The target volume is especially noteworthy. Burrow looked toward Chase 14 times, meaning Chase accounted for a large portion of the Bengals’ passing focus.
Yet Cincinnati did not need Chase to score a touchdown to benefit from his performance. His ability to repeatedly create receiving yardage helped keep Baltimore’s coverage focused on one of the league’s most dangerous offensive weapons.
Andrei Iosivas and Tanner Hudson
The touchdown catches came from players other than Chase.
Tanner Hudson scored on a 14-yard reception in the third quarter, while Andrei Iosivas caught a 29-yard touchdown pass later in the quarter.
This was important from a defensive perspective. Baltimore could not simply concentrate on Chase and expect Cincinnati’s passing game to disappear.</p></p>
Baltimore Recei
ving Stats
<p>Baltimore finished with 17 receptions for 246 yards and no receiving touchdowns. The Ravens averaged 14.5 yards per reception, which was higher than Cincinnati’s 10.9.
| Receiver | Receptions | Yards | Average | TD | Long | Targets |
| Isaiah Likely | 5 | 95 | 19.0 | 0 | 43 | 6 |
| Mark Andrews | 4 | 47 | 11.8 | 0 | 19 | 6 |
| Derrick Henry | 1 | 44 | 44.0 | 0 | 44 | 1 |
| DeAndre Hopkins | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 0 | 15 | 3 |
| Charlie Kolar | 1 | 17 | 17.0 | 0 | 17 | 1 |
| Keaton Mitchell | 2 | 12 | 6.0 | 0 | 12 | 3 |
| Zay Flowers | 2 | 6 | 3.0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
| Rashod Bateman | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Devontez Walker | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Team | 17 | 246 | 14.5 | 0 | 44 | 30 |
Isaiah Likely
Likely led Baltimore with five receptions for 95 yards. He averaged 19 yards per reception and produced a 43-yard gain.
That is a strong statistical performance for a tight end, but it did not result in a touchdown.
Likely’s night also included a lost fumble, adding to Baltimore’s turnover problems.
Mark Andrews
Andrews caught four passes for 47 yards on six targets. He provided a reliable secondary option, but Cincinnati prevented Baltimore’s receiving production from turning into enough scoring drives.
Zay Flowers
Flowers caught two passes for only six yards despite receiving seven targets.
That is one of the clearest examples of why targets alone do not equal offensive success. Flowers was involved in the passing plan, but the production per target was extremely low.
Bengals Defensive Performance
Cincinnati’s defense recorded 56 total tackles, 32 solo tackles, two sacks, two tackles for loss, six passes defended, and five quarterback hits.
Most importantly, the Bengals forced five turnovers.
| Defensive Player | Tackles | Solo | Key Production |
| Jordan Battle | 10 | 6 | Team tackle leader |
| Dax Hill | 6 | 3 | Six tackles |
| Demetrius Knight Jr. | 5 | 3 | Interception, 39-yard return |
| Barrett Carter | 5 | 3 | Five tackles |
Jordan Battle led Cincinnati with 10 tackles, while Dax Hill added six.
Demetrius Knight Jr. provided perhaps the most important individual defensive play with his interception and 39-yard return. That takeaway helped Cincinnati protect and extend its advantage.
The Bengals also recorded two sacks. The official team summary specifically credited Joseph Ossai with two sacks in the first half.
Baltimore Defensive Performance
Baltimore recorded 81 tackles, 44 solo tackles, one sack, four tackles for loss, six passes defended, and seven quarterback hits.
| Defensive Player | Tackles | Solo | Key Production |
| Roquan Smith | 11 | 3 | Team tackle leader |
| Marlon Humphrey | 9 | 7 | 1 sack, 1 TFL, 2 QB hits |
| Alohi Gilman | 8 | 5 | 1 pass defended |
| Teddye Buchanan | 7 | 5 | Seven tackles |
| Kyle Hamilton | 7 | 4 | 1 TFL, 1 PD |
Roquan Smith led the Ravens with 11 tackles.
Marlon Humphrey produced nine tackles, one sack, one tackle for loss, and two quarterback hits. Baltimore’s defense was active throughout the game, but the number of defensive snaps was also high because Cincinnati possessed the ball for nearly 39 minutes.
This is an important statistical distinction. A defense can accumulate a large tackle total in a game where the opposing offense controls possession.
The Turnover Battle Explains the Final Score
The single biggest statistical difference was turnovers.
Cincinnati committed one turnover.
Baltimore committed five.
That produced a four-turnover advantage for Cincinnati.
| Team | Total Turnovers | Fumbles Lost | Interceptions Thrown |
| Cincinnati | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Baltimore | 5 | 4 | 1 |
Baltimore lost fumbles by Lamar Jackson, Isaiah Likely, and Zay Flowers, while Jackson also threw an interception. Cincinnati lost one fumble by Samaje Perine.
The final score becomes much easier to understand when these numbers are placed beside the yardage totals.
Baltimore actually gained 346 total yards to Cincinnati’s 382. Baltimore also averaged 6.1 yards per play compared with Cincinnati’s 4.8.
Yet Baltimore had only 21:14 of possession compared with Cincinnati’s 38:46 and ran 57 plays compared with Cincinnati’s 80. Cincinnati also converted eight of 19 third downs, while Baltimore converted only three of 10.
This is why the final score should not be interpreted as a simple statement that Cincinnati dominated every statistical category.
The Bengals dominated the categories that directly influenced possession and scoring opportunities.
Evan McPherson Was a Major Difference Maker
Evan McPherson delivered one of the most important kicking performances of the game.
He made all six of his field-goal attempts and both extra-point attempts, scoring 20 points.
His field goals came from 31, 42, 24, 33, 52, and 41 yards.
A six-field-goal performance is particularly valuable in a game where the offense struggled to finish early drives.
NFL’s official game summary reported that Cincinnati reached the red zone four times in the first half without scoring a touchdown, while McPherson kept the Bengals on the scoreboard.
That gives the kicking statistics real context. McPherson was not simply adding extra points after touchdowns. He was converting drives that otherwise might have ended without points.
His 52-yard field goal in the fourth quarter also helped Cincinnati maintain a three-score advantage.
Special Teams Comparison
Cincinnati and Baltimore also produced useful field-position numbers.
Cincinnati’s Gary Brightwell returned three kickoffs for 59 yards, averaging 19.7 yards per return.
Baltimore’s Keaton Mitchell returned three kickoffs for 91 yards, averaging 30.3 yards per return, while Rasheen Ali returned three for 71 yards.
Baltimore therefore had the stronger kickoff-return production.
Cincinnati’s punt-return group produced 19 yards on two returns, while Baltimore had no punt returns.
On punts, Ryan Rehkow averaged 52.5 yards on two Cincinnati punts, while Jordan Stout averaged 49.7 yards on three Baltimore punts.
The special-teams numbers were not the main reason for Cincinnati’s win, but they show that Baltimore was capable of generating good field position in isolated situations.
Third Down and Possession Were More Important Than Raw Yardage
One of the strongest lessons from this matchup is the value of third-down efficiency.
Cincinnati converted 8 of 19 third downs, while Baltimore converted only 3 of 10.
That difference helped Cincinnati sustain drives.
The Bengals also ran 80 plays compared with 57 for Baltimore.
More plays mean more opportunities to:
- Keep the defense on the field
- Convert third downs
- Create scoring chances
- Recover from inefficient individual plays
- Force the opponent to defend for longer periods
The possession difference was dramatic.
Cincinnati: 38:46
Baltimore: 21:14
That 17-minute-plus advantage is one of the most revealing numbers in the entire box score.
Red Zone Performance Was Strange for Both Teams
Cincinnati won despite scoring only one touchdown on six red-zone opportunities.
Baltimore scored one touchdown on two red-zone opportunities.
At first glance, this seems like an advantage for Baltimore. But Cincinnati created far more scoring opportunities and compensated for red-zone inefficiency through McPherson’s perfect kicking performance.
The Bengals therefore demonstrated two different forms of offensive production.
Inside the red zone, they often settled for field goals.
Outside the red zone, Burrow’s second-half touchdown passes to Hudson and Iosivas created the separation the team needed.
For analysts, this is a useful reminder that red-zone percentage should be read together with the number of opportunities and field-goal reliability.
Bengals vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats: What the Numbers Really Say
The deeper interpretation of these bengals vs baltimore ravens match player stats is that Cincinnati won through complementary football rather than one overwhelming statistical category.
Burrow did not throw for 400 yards.
Chase did not score a touchdown.
Brown did not reach 100 rushing yards.
The Bengals did not average four yards per rushing attempt.
Instead, Cincinnati combined several good elements:
- Burrow avoided interceptions.
- Chase generated 110 receiving yards.
- Brown produced 113 yards from scrimmage.
- Cincinnati’s defense forced five turnovers.
- McPherson scored 20 points.
- Cincinnati controlled possession.
- The Bengals converted more third downs.
- Cincinnati scored 20 second-half points.
That combination was enough to turn a relatively competitive opening quarter into an 18-point victory.
Why Lamar Jackson’s 246 Passing Yards Did Not Translate Into Victory
Jackson’s 246 passing yards are a useful example of why yardage totals can be misleading.
His 7.7 yards per attempt were actually better than Burrow’s 5.7.
Baltimore also averaged 6.1 yards per play.
But the Ravens repeatedly lost possessions through turnovers.
Five turnovers are difficult to overcome against any NFL opponent, especially when the opponent has a quarterback who can protect the football and a kicker who converts every field-goal attempt.
The Ravens also failed to score after halftime except for Mitchell’s rushing touchdown.
After taking a 7-3 first-quarter lead, Baltimore was outscored 29-7 over the rest of the game.
That second-half collapse is arguably more revealing than Jackson’s passing total.
Why Joe Burrow’s 261 Yards Matter
Burrow’s 261 yards were not simply a volume statistic.
He was returning after missing a significant portion of the season, and he had to manage a difficult game environment while facing a Baltimore defense that produced seven quarterback hits.
The performance was imperfect, especially in completion percentage, but the absence of an interception was critical.
His two touchdown passes arrived in the third quarter, helping Cincinnati transform a 12-7 halftime lead into a 26-14 advantage by the end of the quarter.
That sequence effectively decided the game.
NFL’s coverage described Burrow as becoming more comfortable as the game progressed after initially dealing with rust.
Biggest Individual Performances
Best Cincinnati Passing Performance
Joe Burrow: 24 completions on 46 attempts, 261 yards, two touchdowns, zero interceptions.
Best Cincinnati Receiving Performance
Ja’Marr Chase: seven receptions, 110 yards, 15.7 yards per reception.
Best Cincinnati Rushing Performance
Chase Brown: 15 carries, 78 yards, 5.2 yards per carry, plus 35 receiving yards.
Best Cincinnati Special Teams Performance
Evan McPherson: six field goals, two extra points, 20 total points.
Best Cincinnati Defensive Impact
Demetrius Knight Jr.: five tackles and an interception returned 39 yards.
Best Baltimore Passing Performance
Lamar Jackson: 17 completions on 32 attempts, 246 yards.
Best Baltimore Rushing Performance
Derrick Henry: 10 carries, 60 yards, one touchdown.
Best Baltimore Receiving Performance
Isaiah Likely: five receptions, 95 yards.
Best Baltimore Defensive Performance
Roquan Smith: 11 tackles.
What Fantasy Football Managers Can Learn From This Box Score
Although a single game should not dictate future fantasy decisions, this matchup provides several useful lessons.
Chase remained heavily involved with 14 targets and 110 yards, making his volume particularly important.
Brown was also valuable because his production came through both rushing and receiving. His 113 yards from scrimmage demonstrate how an all-purpose workload can matter even when a running back does not score.
Henry produced 104 yards from scrimmage and a rushing touchdown, showing that Baltimore could still generate explosive plays through him.
Likely’s 95 receiving yards were impressive, but his lost fumble reduced the overall value of his performance.
Flowers’ seven targets produced only two catches for six yards, demonstrating the danger of assuming that target volume automatically translates into fantasy production.
What the Game Says About Team Efficiency
The game provides a useful lesson in the difference between efficiency and winning football.
Baltimore was more efficient on a per-play basis.
Cincinnati was more effective at controlling the game.
Those are not always the same thing.
The Bengals created 22 first downs compared with Baltimore’s 16. Cincinnati also produced 11 passing first downs and eight rushing first downs, while Baltimore had seven passing and eight rushing first downs.
Cincinnati’s offense also benefited from three first downs generated by penalties.
That helped extend drives and contributed to the substantial difference in total plays.
A Practical Method for Reading NFL Player Stats
If you are analyzing an NFL box score for betting research, fantasy football, historical analysis, or content creation, do not begin with the final score.
A stronger process is:
Step 1: Check the Quarter-by-Quarter Score
This tells you whether the game was close early and when momentum changed.
Step 2: Compare Turnovers
Turnovers can explain large score differences even when total yardage is relatively close.
Step 3: Review Possession and Plays
Long possession advantages often reveal which team controlled the rhythm.
Step 4: Examine Third Downs
Third-down conversion shows whether an offense consistently extended drives.
Step 5: Separate Passing and Rushing
Look for whether the quarterback carried the offense or whether the running game provided balance.
Step 6: Study Targets
Receiving targets can reveal offensive priorities that raw receptions do not show.
Step 7: Look at Defensive Impact
Tackles are useful, but sacks, interceptions, forced turnovers, quarterback hits, and tackles for loss often provide more context.
Step 8: Check Special Teams
Field goals, return yardage, and punting can become decisive when offensive production is inconsistent.
This approach gives a much more complete picture than simply listing the leading scorers.
Historical Context of the Matchup
The Bengals and Ravens are AFC North rivals, so their games often carry additional importance beyond a normal regular-season matchup.
The November 2025 meeting was particularly notable because Burrow returned to the field after his injury absence. NFL reported that he had missed nine games before returning against Baltimore.
That context changes how his statistics should be evaluated.
A quarterback returning from a long layoff should not automatically be judged against the same expectations as a quarterback who has played every week.
Burrow’s early struggles were followed by two touchdown passes in the third quarter and a Cincinnati victory.
For a player returning from injury, the ability to improve throughout the game can be more informative than a single efficiency statistic.
Key Takeaways From the Bengals vs Baltimore Ravens Match Player Stats
The biggest lessons from this game are straightforward.
Cincinnati won the turnover battle by four.
The Bengals held the ball for more than 38 minutes.
They ran 80 offensive plays.
They converted eight third downs.
McPherson scored 20 points.
Burrow threw two touchdowns without an interception.
Chase produced 110 receiving yards.
Brown contributed 113 yards from scrimmage.
Baltimore still produced 346 total yards and averaged 6.1 yards per play, which shows that the 32-14 score was not simply the result of Cincinnati completely shutting down the Ravens offense.
The difference was execution at critical moments.
Final Assessment
The bengals vs baltimore ravens match player stats show a game where Cincinnati’s most important advantage was not total yardage. It was possession control, turnover creation, third-down execution, and reliable scoring.
Joe Burrow’s return was the headline story, but the victory required much more than quarterback production. Ja’Marr Chase consistently moved the ball, Chase Brown contributed as both a runner and receiver, and Evan McPherson converted every field-goal attempt.
Baltimore had several impressive individual numbers. Lamar Jackson passed for 246 yards, Derrick Henry produced 104 yards from scrimmage, and Isaiah Likely gained 95 receiving yards. Yet those performances were undermined by five turnovers and limited second-half scoring.
The most useful conclusion from this box score is therefore simple: NFL games are often decided by the quality of possessions rather than the number of yards gained.
Cincinnati turned Baltimore’s mistakes into points, protected the football better, stayed on the field longer, and finished the game strongly. The 32-14 result reflected that combination of execution.
For readers comparing individual performances, Burrow and Chase led the offensive story for Cincinnati, Henry and Likely provided Baltimore’s strongest production, and McPherson was arguably the most direct scoring difference maker. On defense, Cincinnati’s five takeaways were the statistic that changed the game most dramatically.
The official NFL game report provides additional context for the matchup and its major developments. NFL official game coverage
