Toronto Raptors vs Washington Wizards Match Player Stats

The toronto raptors vs washington wizards match player stats from the October 12, 2025 NBA preseason meeting tell a much more interesting story than the final 113-112 score suggests. Toronto escaped Capital One Arena with a one-point victory, but Washington controlled important stretches of the game, won the rebounding battle, shot a better overall field-goal percentage, and pushed the Raptors into a tense finish. Toronto’s advantage came from a combination of free-throw accuracy, offensive rebounding, fewer turnovers, and timely scoring from Immanuel Quickley and the supporting cast. NBA.com records the game as a preseason contest at Capital One Arena with an attendance of 9,403.

The date is worth clarifying because some references may display the matchup differently depending on scheduling or indexing. The official NBA game page lists the contest as Sunday, October 12, 2025, while ESPN also records Toronto’s 113-112 victory on October 12.

This article breaks down the complete team numbers, leading performers, shooting efficiency, rebounding battle, ball security, defensive activity, and the late-game sequence that ultimately decided the result.

Toronto Raptors vs Washington Wizards Match Player Stats: Game Overview

Toronto entered the game with a 2-1 preseason record and improved to 3-1 after the victory. Washington began its preseason schedule with the loss. ESPN’s schedule data lists Toronto at 3-1 and 2-0 on the road following the game, while Washington was 0-1 and 0-1 at home.

The final score was:

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Final
Toronto Raptors	26	26	35	26	113
Washington Wizards	20	33	26	33	112

Toronto’s 35-point third quarter proved particularly important. Washington answered with 33 points in the fourth, but Toronto had enough of a cushion to survive the final push.

NBA.com identifies the contest as a preseason game and lists the officials as Matt Myers, Dedric Taylor, and Ray Acosta.

Team statistical comparison

Category	Toronto Raptors	Washington Wizards
Points	113	112
Field Goals	36-107	35-89
Field-Goal Percentage	34%	39%
3-Pointers	14-49	9-31
3-Point Percentage	29%	29%
Free Throws	27-30	33-41
Free-Throw Percentage	90%	80%
Rebounds	59	63
Assists	21	21
Turnovers	10	19
Steals	12	5
Blocks	4	11
Offensive Rebounds	17	15
Defensive Rebounds	42	48
Fouls	32	24

The numbers reveal why this game remained close despite Toronto’s victory.

Washington shot 39% from the field compared with Toronto’s 34%. The Wizards also collected four more total rebounds and blocked seven more shots. Those are meaningful advantages.

Toronto, however, made 14 three-pointers compared with nine for Washington, converted 90% of its free throws, grabbed two more offensive rebounds, and committed only 10 turnovers compared with Washington’s 19.

That turnover difference is especially important. Toronto gave Washington fewer opportunities to score in transition while also creating 12 steals. NBA.com’s game summary shows Toronto scoring 25 fast-break points compared with 12 for Washington.

Toronto Raptors Player Statistics

Toronto’s starting group consisted of Sandro Mamukelashvili, RJ Barrett, Scottie Barnes, Immanuel Quickley, and Ja’Kobe Walter.

The starters did not dominate the scoring column individually, but several contributed in multiple statistical categories.

Immanuel Quickley

Quickley led Toronto with 18 points in 24 minutes.

He shot 6-for-16 from the field and made 5 of his 10 three-point attempts. He also finished 1-for-2 at the free-throw line.

His shooting line was:

• 18 points
• 6-for-16 field goals
• 5-for-10 from three
• 1-for-2 free throws
• 3 rebounds
• 3 assists
• 1 turnover

The most notable part of Quickley’s performance was his three-point shooting. Toronto attempted 49 threes as a team, and Quickley converted five of them. That made his outside shooting an important part of the Raptors’ offensive attack.

ESPN’s play-by-play record also shows Quickley hitting a deep three during the game, illustrating how Toronto generated scoring from beyond the arc.

Scottie Barnes

Scottie Barnes produced one of the most complete stat lines of the night despite scoring only 10 points.

He finished with:

• 10 points
• 3-for-11 shooting
• 0-for-3 from three
• 4-for-4 free throws
• 12 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 3 steals
• 1 turnover

The 12 rebounds led all Toronto players. His four assists also tied for the team lead, while his three steals were the highest total for either Toronto player.

This is an important example of why a box score cannot be judged by points alone. Barnes was inefficient as a scorer, but his rebounding, passing, and defensive activity gave Toronto value in several areas.

His +22 plus-minus was also the highest among Toronto players shown in the box score.

RJ Barrett

Barrett played 24 minutes and finished with 15 points.

His line included:

• 15 points
• 4-for-12 field goals
• 2-for-5 from three
• 5-for-5 free throws
• 3 rebounds
• 1 assist
• 2 steals
• 2 turnovers

His perfect 5-for-5 performance at the free-throw line helped Toronto maintain its strong overall free-throw percentage.

Barrett also contributed two steals, adding to Toronto’s defensive pressure.

Ja’Kobe Walter

Walter started and played 22 minutes.

He recorded:

• 10 points
• 3-for-10 field goals
• 1-for-6 from three
• 3-for-3 free throws
• 4 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 2 steals
• 1 turnover

Walter’s shooting from outside was not efficient, but he contributed in several other areas. His two steals were particularly useful within a Toronto defense that forced Washington into 19 turnovers.

Sandro Mamukelashvili

Mamukelashvili started at center and finished with eight points and nine rebounds.

He shot 4-for-11 from the field and added three assists and two steals.

His nine rebounds were second among Toronto’s starters behind Barnes. He also collected four offensive rebounds, helping Toronto create additional possessions.

Toronto’s bench production

Toronto’s bench provided several important contributions.

Jamal Shead scored seven points and supplied four assists in 13 minutes. Jamison Battle added seven points, while Ochai Agbaji scored five.

Olivier Sarr finished with four points, four rebounds, and three blocks in 18 minutes.

Gradey Dick scored eight points and grabbed one rebound, while Chucky Hepburn scored 12 points in only 11 minutes. Hepburn shot 4-for-6 overall and 3-for-4 from three.

That short burst from Hepburn was significant because it gave Toronto additional perimeter scoring beyond its primary rotation.

NBA’s official box score confirms the individual minutes, shooting figures, rebounds, assists, steals, blocks, turnovers, and plus-minus totals for the Toronto roster.

Washington Wizards Player Statistics

Washington started Khris Middleton, Kyshawn George, Alex Sarr, CJ McCollum, and Bub Carrington.

The Wizards’ starting lineup produced several strong individual performances, especially from McCollum and Middleton.

CJ McCollum

McCollum led Washington with 19 points.

He shot 7-for-14 from the field and 5-for-9 from three-point range.

His complete line was:

• 19 points
• 7-for-14 field goals
• 5-for-9 from three
• 5 rebounds
• 2 assists
• 4 turnovers
• 1 steal

His 5-for-9 three-point shooting was one of the most efficient individual scoring performances of the game.

McCollum’s outside shooting helped Washington stay competitive even though Toronto created more three-point makes overall.

ESPN lists McCollum as Washington’s leading scorer for the contest.

Khris Middleton

Middleton finished with 11 points, nine rebounds, and five assists.

He was extremely efficient from the field, making all four of his attempts.

His line included:

• 11 points
• 4-for-4 field goals
• 1-for-1 from three
• 2-for-2 free throws
• 9 rebounds
• 5 assists
• 2 turnovers

The nine rebounds tied Kyshawn George for Washington’s team lead.

Middleton’s five assists were also the most on the Wizards.

Kyshawn George

George produced one of the more unusual statistical lines of the game.

He scored 11 points while shooting 3-for-14 from the field and 1-for-7 from three.

However, he grabbed nine rebounds and recorded four blocks.

That defensive production was especially notable because Washington finished with 11 blocks as a team, compared with only four for Toronto.

George’s four blocks were the most by any player in the game.

Alex Sarr

Sarr scored 12 points and collected eight rebounds.

He shot 4-for-5 from the field and made his only three-point attempt.

He also recorded two assists, one steal, and two blocks.

His 4-for-5 shooting made him one of Washington’s most efficient scorers among the starters.

Bub Carrington

Carrington struggled to score efficiently.

He finished with four points on 0-for-8 shooting and missed all five of his three-point attempts.

He did make four free throws from six attempts and added one rebound and two assists.

His four turnovers were tied with McCollum for the most on Washington.

That contributed to the Wizards’ overall turnover problem.

Washington’s Bench Impact

Washington received 10 points from Marvin Bagley III, nine from Tristan Vukcevic, and 10 from Cam Whitmore.

Bagley III shot 3-for-8 and grabbed seven rebounds.

Vukcevic was perfect from the field at 2-for-2 and converted all five of his free throws, finishing with nine points.

Whitmore scored 10 points on 4-for-7 shooting and also recorded a block.

Malaki Branham added four points, while Jamir Watkins scored three.

Will Riley contributed four points and two rebounds.

The Wizards therefore had several productive reserve performances, but the team’s 19 turnovers remained a major issue.

What the Team Numbers Really Say

Looking only at the final score makes this game appear almost perfectly balanced.

The deeper numbers show a different picture.

Washington won the shooting efficiency battle

Washington made 35 of 89 field-goal attempts, good for 39%.

Toronto made 36 of 107 attempts, or 34%.

That means Toronto took 18 more shots but made only one more field goal.

This is an important distinction when analyzing preseason games. Shot volume and shooting efficiency are separate elements.

Toronto’s large number of attempts came partly from its 17 offensive rebounds and Washington’s 19 turnovers.

Toronto won the three-point volume battle

Toronto made 14 three-pointers from 49 attempts.

Washington made nine from 31.

Both teams shot 29% from three, so the difference was not accuracy. It was volume.

Toronto attempted 18 more three-pointers and made five more.

Those five additional three-point makes accounted for 15 points, which is larger than the final one-point margin.

Free throws favored Toronto’s efficiency

Toronto made 27 of 30 free throws.

Washington made 33 of 41.

Washington actually attempted 11 more free throws and made six more free throws.

However, Toronto converted at 90%, while Washington shot 80%.

The free-throw battle therefore produced more total points for Washington, but Toronto was considerably more efficient when reaching the line.

Rebounding favored Washington overall

Washington grabbed 63 rebounds compared with Toronto’s 59.

The Wizards also collected 48 defensive rebounds against Toronto’s 42.

However, Toronto won the offensive-rebounding comparison 17-15.

That small difference mattered because offensive rebounds create second-chance opportunities.

Toronto’s 107 field-goal attempts compared with Washington’s 89 show just how important additional possessions were.

Turnovers were one of the biggest differences

Toronto committed only 10 turnovers.

Washington committed 19.

That is a nine-turnover difference.

Toronto also recorded 12 steals compared with Washington’s five.

The combination meant Toronto generated more defensive events while protecting its own possessions better.

NBA.com’s summary records Toronto with 25 fast-break points compared with Washington’s 12, supporting the idea that Toronto’s defensive activity translated into transition opportunities.

The Biggest Statistical Contrast: Shot Quality vs Shot Volume

One of the most useful ways to understand this matchup is to separate shot quality from shot volume.

Washington shot the ball better overall.

Toronto created more attempts.

The Raptors took 107 field-goal attempts, compared with 89 for the Wizards.

That 18-shot difference is enormous in a game decided by one point.

Toronto’s 17 offensive rebounds helped create some of those additional opportunities. Washington’s 19 turnovers also allowed Toronto to gain possessions without necessarily needing to win every half-court matchup.

This is why simply saying that Washington shot 39% while Toronto shot 34% would provide an incomplete analysis.

The Raptors compensated for lower field-goal efficiency by generating more possessions and making more threes.

Why Scottie Barnes’ Rebounding Mattered

Barnes’ 12 rebounds were particularly important because Washington had a strong overall rebounding advantage.

He collected 10 defensive rebounds, helping Toronto limit second opportunities after Washington’s missed shots.

His four assists and three steals further demonstrate how his contribution extended beyond scoring.

The 10 points on 3-for-11 shooting were not spectacular offensively, but the complete statistical contribution was much broader.

For anyone studying player performance, Barnes is a useful example of why points per game should not be treated as the only measure of impact.

Why Immanuel Quickley’s Shooting Was Important

Quickley’s 18 points were the highest total for Toronto.

His five made three-pointers were particularly valuable because Toronto relied heavily on perimeter attempts.

He attempted 10 threes by himself.

Toronto ultimately made 14 threes as a team, meaning Quickley accounted for more than one-third of the Raptors’ successful three-point shots.

His performance also helped offset the inefficient shooting of several teammates.

Washington’s Defense Created Problems

Washington’s 11 blocks were a major statistical highlight.

Kyshawn George had four.

Alex Sarr had two.

Several reserve players also recorded blocks.

Toronto therefore faced legitimate resistance around the basket.

Despite that, the Raptors found other ways to generate offense through three-point attempts, offensive rebounds, transition opportunities, and free throws.

This creates an important tactical contrast.

Washington’s defensive activity was visible in the block total, while Toronto’s defensive impact showed up more clearly in steals and turnovers.

The Fourth Quarter and Late Finish

The fourth quarter was one of the most competitive periods of the game.

Washington scored 33 points in the final quarter.

Toronto scored 26.

That allowed the Wizards to erase much of Toronto’s advantage and bring the contest down to the final possessions.

NBA.com’s official game summary identifies Olivier Sarr as the player who scored the game-winning basket at the buzzer.

That detail is important because the final score alone does not communicate how dramatically the game ended.

Toronto’s 113-112 victory was therefore not a comfortable preseason win. Washington had opportunities to take control late, but Toronto ultimately produced the decisive final play.

Comparing the Leading Players

A useful way to summarize the major individual performances is to place the leading contributors side by side.

Player	Team	Points	Rebounds	Assists	Other Key Stats
Immanuel Quickley	Toronto	18	3	3	5 threes
Scottie Barnes	Toronto	10	12	4	3 steals
RJ Barrett	Toronto	15	3	1	5-for-5 FT
CJ McCollum	Washington	19	5	2	5 threes
Khris Middleton	Washington	11	9	5	4-for-4 FG
Kyshawn George	Washington	11	9	3	4 blocks
Alex Sarr	Washington	12	8	0	2 blocks

The table demonstrates why the matchup cannot be reduced to the top scorer.

McCollum had the highest individual scoring total at 19, but Quickley led Toronto with 18.

Barnes had the most rebounds for Toronto, Middleton and George tied for Washington’s lead with nine, and Middleton led all players in assists with five.

Toronto Raptors vs Washington Wizards Match Player Stats and What They Reveal

The toronto raptors vs washington wizards match player stats show two teams winning different statistical categories.

Toronto won the final score.

Washington won field-goal percentage.

Washington won total rebounds.

Washington produced more blocks.

Toronto won three-point makes.

Toronto won offensive rebounds.

Toronto committed nine fewer turnovers.

Toronto recorded seven more steals.

Those differences explain the one-point result better than any single scoring statistic.

The game was essentially a contest between Washington’s shooting efficiency and Toronto’s possession creation.

Previous Matchup Context

The supplied matchup data also references three previous meetings in the season series:

• Toronto 140, Washington 110 on November 22
• Washington 117, Toronto 138 on December 27
• Washington 134, Toronto 125 on March 1

Those results indicate that the teams had already produced several high-scoring games in their broader matchup history.

However, it is important not to mix those later or earlier regular-season results with the October preseason box score when analyzing individual player performance.

The October contest should be evaluated on its own statistical record.

Preseason rotations can also differ substantially from regular-season rotations, making direct comparisons less straightforward.

Important Context About Preseason Statistics

Preseason numbers are useful, but they should be interpreted carefully.

Coaches often use preseason games to evaluate combinations, distribute minutes, test defensive schemes, and give opportunities to players competing for rotation roles.

That means a player’s statistical line does not necessarily represent how that player will be used during the regular season.

The October 12 contest is particularly useful for examining individual skill contributions such as shooting, rebounding, passing, ball security, and defensive activity.

It should not automatically be treated as a prediction of regular-season usage.

This distinction is especially important for readers searching player stats because a box score tells you what happened in one game, not everything about a player’s long-term role.

Key Takeaways From the Box Score

Several conclusions stand out from the numbers.

1. Toronto’s ball security was decisive

The Raptors committed 10 turnovers while Washington committed 19.

Nine extra turnovers can create a substantial possession advantage.

2. Toronto created more offensive opportunities

Toronto grabbed 17 offensive rebounds and attempted 107 field goals.

Washington had 15 offensive rebounds and 89 field-goal attempts.

The Raptors therefore generated many more shooting opportunities.

3. Washington shot more accurately

The Wizards made 39% of their field goals.

Toronto made 34%.

That advantage helped Washington remain competitive throughout the game.

4. Toronto’s three-point volume mattered

Toronto made 14 threes.

Washington made nine.

Both teams shot 29%, making volume the key difference.

5. Barnes affected the game in several ways

His 12 rebounds, four assists, and three steals were important contributions despite his 10-point scoring total.

6. McCollum provided Washington’s primary scoring punch

His 19 points came on 7-for-14 shooting, including 5-for-9 from three.

7. The game came down to the final possession

NBA.com records Olivier Sarr’s buzzer-beating basket as the decisive play.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score between Toronto and Washington?

The Toronto Raptors defeated the Washington Wizards 113-112 in the preseason game at Capital One Arena.

Who led Toronto in scoring?

Immanuel Quickley led Toronto with 18 points. He made five three-pointers in the contest.

Who led Washington in scoring?

CJ McCollum led Washington with 19 points on 7-for-14 shooting, including 5-for-9 from three-point range.

Who had the most rebounds?

Scottie Barnes led Toronto with 12 rebounds. Khris Middleton and Kyshawn George each collected nine rebounds for Washington.

Who led the game in assists?

Khris Middleton led all players with five assists. Scottie Barnes and several other players contributed four or fewer assists.

Who scored the game-winning basket?

Olivier Sarr scored the game-winning basket at the buzzer, according to NBA.com’s official game summary.

Conclusion

The toronto raptors vs washington wizards match player stats provide a detailed picture of a preseason game decided by a single point.

Washington was more efficient from the field and won the overall rebounding battle. The Wizards also produced 11 blocks, with Kyshawn George leading the way with four.

Toronto countered with better ball security, more offensive rebounds, more three-point makes, and significantly more steals. Immanuel Quickley led the Raptors with 18 points, while Scottie Barnes contributed 12 rebounds, four assists, and three steals. CJ McCollum led all scorers with 19 points for Washington, and Khris Middleton supplied nine rebounds and five assists.

The most revealing statistic may be the turnover difference. Toronto gave the ball away only 10 times while Washington committed 19 turnovers. Combined with Toronto’s 17 offensive rebounds and 14 made three-pointers, that possession advantage helped compensate for the Raptors’ lower overall field-goal percentage.

The result was a tightly contested 113-112 game in which Washington’s shooting efficiency and defensive presence were balanced by Toronto’s ability to create additional possessions and capitalize on them.

For readers analyzing the box score beyond the headline result, this game is a useful example of how basketball outcomes are shaped by several interconnected categories. Scoring matters, but shooting volume, turnovers, offensive rebounds, free throws, three-point production, and defensive events can collectively determine the result when two teams are separated by only one point.