Philadelphia Eagles vs Chargers Match Player Stats
The philadelphia eagles vs chargers match player stats tell the story of a tightly contested NFL showdown that was decided only after overtime. Played on December 8, 2025, this game featured outstanding defensive performances, explosive rushing plays, clutch special teams execution, and several momentum swings that kept both teams in contention until the final kick. The Los Angeles Chargers eventually secured a 22 to 19 overtime victory over the Philadelphia Eagles, improving their record to 9 and 4, while the Eagles fell to 8 and 5.
Although the final score was close, the statistics reveal two very different approaches. Philadelphia dominated several offensive categories, especially through Saquon Barkley’s rushing performance and A.J. Brown’s receiving production. Meanwhile, Los Angeles relied on timely defensive plays, four interceptions, disciplined ball control, and a perfect kicking display from Cameron Dicker to secure an important home victory.
This detailed breakdown examines every major aspect of the game, including quarterback performances, rushing leaders, receiving production, defensive standouts, special teams contributions, and the statistics that ultimately determined the outcome.
Match Overview
| Match Detail | Result |
| Sport | NFL |
| Date | December 8, 2025 |
| Venue | Chargers Home Stadium |
| Final Score | Los Angeles Chargers 22, Philadelphia Eagles 19 (OT) |
| Philadelphia Record | 8 and 5 |
| Los Angeles Record | 9 and 4 |
Quarter by Quarter Score
| Quarter | Philadelphia Eagles | Los Angeles Chargers |
| First | 3 | 7 |
| Second | 3 | 3 |
| Third | 3 | 3 |
| Fourth | 10 | 6 |
| Overtime | 0 | 3 |
| Final | 19 | 22 |
The Chargers established an early advantage by scoring a touchdown during the opening quarter. Philadelphia responded steadily throughout regulation and eventually forced overtime after a strong fourth quarter. However, Los Angeles remained composed in the extra period, converting the decisive field goal to seal the victory.
Philadelphia Eagles vs Chargers Match Player Stats Breakdown
A closer examination of the philadelphia eagles vs chargers match player stats highlights how individual performances shaped the contest. Philadelphia generated more explosive offensive plays, but turnovers and missed scoring opportunities prevented them from capitalizing fully. On the other side, Los Angeles maximized field position, protected key moments despite offensive struggles, and leaned on outstanding defensive execution.
Several statistical categories immediately stand out.
- Philadelphia gained 240 passing yards compared to Los Angeles’ 139 passing yards.
- The Eagles also produced 134 rushing yards, while the Chargers accumulated 169 rushing yards.
- Philadelphia recorded seven sacks, placing constant pressure on Justin Herbert.
- Los Angeles intercepted Jalen Hurts four times, completely changing the flow of the game.
- Cameron Dicker scored 16 points, making every field goal attempt.
These numbers explain why a team that produced fewer passing yards still managed to leave the field victorious.
Game Flow and Momentum
The opening quarter belonged to Los Angeles.
An early touchdown gave the Chargers confidence while forcing Philadelphia to chase the game from the beginning. Although the Eagles answered with a field goal, their offense struggled to convert promising drives into touchdowns during the first three quarters.
Philadelphia’s defense consistently created pressure by collapsing the pocket around Justin Herbert. Seven sacks limited the Chargers’ passing rhythm and prevented explosive downfield opportunities.
Despite that defensive dominance, the Eagles offense repeatedly handed momentum back through costly interceptions.
The fourth quarter completely changed the atmosphere.
Philadelphia finally established offensive rhythm behind Saquon Barkley’s rushing ability and A.J. Brown’s receiving production. The Eagles scored ten points during the period and tied the contest, forcing overtime.
Once overtime began, both defenses remained aggressive. The Chargers ultimately produced the final scoring drive before Cameron Dicker delivered another accurate field goal to end the game.
Quarterback Performance Analysis
Quarterback play became one of the defining themes of this matchup.
Neither passer delivered his cleanest statistical performance, yet each influenced the outcome in very different ways.
Jalen Hurts Performance
| Statistic | Value |
| Completions | 21 |
| Attempts | 40 |
| Passing Yards | 240 |
| Average | 6.0 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 0 |
| Interceptions | 4 |
| Times Sacked | 1 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 9 |
| QBR | 25.1 |
| Passer Rating | 31.2 |
At first glance, Hurts’ passing yardage appears respectable.
His 240 passing yards exceeded Justin Herbert’s total by more than one hundred yards, and he successfully connected with multiple receivers throughout the game.
However, the four interceptions overshadowed nearly every positive aspect of his performance.
Each turnover either ended a promising drive or gave Los Angeles favorable field position. Even though the Eagles moved the football effectively between the twenties, they struggled to finish drives because of these costly mistakes.
Interestingly, Hurts absorbed only one sack throughout the contest. Philadelphia’s offensive line generally protected him well, but protection alone could not overcome the impact of multiple interceptions.
His passer rating of 31.2 reflects one of the most difficult outings of his season.
Justin Herbert Performance
| Statistic | Value |
| Completions | 12 |
| Attempts | 26 |
| Passing Yards | 139 |
| Average | 5.3 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 1 |
| Interceptions | 1 |
| Times Sacked | 7 |
| Sack Yards Lost | 33 |
| QBR | 32.5 |
| Passer Rating | 59.6 |
Justin Herbert endured relentless pressure throughout the evening.
Being sacked seven times would normally prevent most offenses from winning. Philadelphia’s defensive front consistently disrupted passing lanes and forced Herbert into uncomfortable situations.
Despite those challenges, Herbert avoided the catastrophic mistakes that hurt Philadelphia.
His lone touchdown pass provided valuable points early in the contest, while his single interception proved far less damaging than Hurts’ four turnovers.
Another overlooked contribution came through Herbert’s mobility.
Rather than forcing risky throws, he frequently escaped pressure and converted critical rushing opportunities that kept Chargers drives alive.
From an efficiency standpoint, Herbert’s passing numbers were modest.
Yet his decision making during high pressure situations contributed significantly to Los Angeles earning the overtime victory.
Comparing the Two Quarterbacks
Looking beyond total passing yards reveals why the Chargers won despite producing fewer aerial yards.
| Category | Jalen Hurts | Justin Herbert |
| Passing Yards | 240 | 139 |
| Passing TD | 0 | 1 |
| Interceptions | 4 | 1 |
| Sacks Taken | 1 | 7 |
| Passer Rating | 31.2 | 59.6 |
Philadelphia won the yardage battle.
Los Angeles won the turnover battle.
In close NFL games, turnovers frequently outweigh total offensive production, and this matchup served as another strong example of that principle.
Rushing Attack Sets the Tone
One of the most impressive performances from the entire game belonged to Saquon Barkley.
The Eagles running back consistently broke tackles, created explosive runs, and gave Philadelphia offensive balance whenever the passing attack stalled.
His longest run of 52 yards completely shifted momentum during one drive and demonstrated why he remains one of the league’s most dangerous runners in open space.
The Chargers, however, responded with a balanced rushing approach rather than relying on one featured back.
Justin Herbert surprisingly finished as Los Angeles’ leading rusher, showcasing both toughness and athleticism while extending drives under constant defensive pressure.
Leading Rushers
| Player | Carries | Yards | Average | TD |
| Saquon Barkley | 20 | 122 | 6.1 | 1 |
| Justin Herbert | 10 | 66 | 6.6 | 0 |
Barkley’s efficiency stood out throughout regulation, while Herbert’s scrambling ability became a hidden factor in the Chargers’ eventual overtime success.
Complete Team Rushing Comparison
The ground game played a significant role throughout this matchup. While Philadelphia relied heavily on Saquon Barkley to generate explosive gains, Los Angeles spread rushing attempts across multiple players, creating a balanced attack that consistently moved the chains.
Although the Eagles produced the game’s most impressive individual rushing performance, the Chargers finished with more total rushing yards as a team. Their commitment to running the football helped control the clock, reduced pressure on Justin Herbert during obvious passing situations, and created manageable third downs.
| Team | Carries | Rushing Yards | Average | Touchdowns |
| Philadelphia Eagles | 25 | 134 | 5.4 | 1 |
| Los Angeles Chargers | 38 | 169 | 4.4 | 0 |
Philadelphia averaged more yards per rushing attempt, but Los Angeles accumulated a higher overall rushing total because of its greater number of carries. That balance became increasingly valuable during the fourth quarter and overtime, when maintaining possession proved just as important as generating explosive plays.
Receiving Leaders
Passing statistics only tell part of the story. Examining the receiving numbers provides a clearer understanding of how each offense attacked the opposing defense.
Philadelphia relied heavily on A.J. Brown, who consistently created separation and delivered timely receptions. Los Angeles, meanwhile, spread the football among several targets, with Kimani Vidal producing the game’s longest reception for the Chargers.
Philadelphia Eagles Receiving Leader
A.J. Brown once again demonstrated why he is among the NFL’s premier wide receivers.
| Statistic | Value |
| Receptions | 6 |
| Receiving Yards | 100 |
| Average | 16.7 |
| Targets | 13 |
Brown reached the 100 yard milestone despite facing consistent defensive attention. His ability to gain yards after the catch and stretch the field helped Philadelphia sustain several important drives.
However, the offense struggled to convert those opportunities into touchdowns because turnovers repeatedly interrupted offensive momentum.
Los Angeles Chargers Receiving Leader
Kimani Vidal made the most of his limited opportunities.
| Statistic | Value |
| Receptions | 1 |
| Receiving Yards | 60 |
| Long Reception | 60 |
Although Vidal recorded only one catch, it immediately changed field position and highlighted the Chargers’ ability to produce explosive plays even with limited passing volume.
Team Receiving Statistics
The overall receiving numbers further emphasize the contrasting offensive approaches used by both teams.
| Team | Receptions | Yards | Average | Targets | Receiving TD |
| Philadelphia Eagles | 21 | 240 | 11.4 | 38 | 0 |
| Los Angeles Chargers | 12 | 139 | 11.6 | 23 | 1 |
Philadelphia completed nearly twice as many passes and gained significantly more receiving yards.
Despite that advantage, Los Angeles finished with the only passing touchdown of the game, illustrating the importance of efficiency inside scoring territory.
Turnovers That Changed Everything
When reviewing the philadelphia eagles vs chargers match player stats, no category had a greater influence than turnovers.
Philadelphia moved the football effectively for much of the game, but every interception shifted momentum toward Los Angeles.
Jalen Hurts threw four interceptions, allowing the Chargers defense to erase promising scoring opportunities while consistently giving its offense favorable field position.
Los Angeles committed only one interception, limiting the damage from its offensive struggles.
Interception Summary
| Team | Total Interceptions |
| Philadelphia Eagles | 1 |
| Los Angeles Chargers | 4 |
Chargers Defensive Interceptions
The Chargers secondary delivered one of its strongest collective performances of the season.
Each defender contributed at a crucial moment.
| Player | Interception |
| Cam Hart | 1 |
| Da’Shawn Hand | 1 |
| Donte Jackson | 1 |
| Tony Jefferson | 1 |
Rather than relying on one standout defender, Los Angeles received impact plays from multiple members of its defense.
That balanced effort prevented Philadelphia from finding offensive rhythm during critical moments.
Eagles Defensive Interception
Philadelphia recorded one interception during the game.
| Player | Interception |
| Adoree’ Jackson | 1 |
Although Jackson’s takeaway provided an important defensive highlight, it could not offset the four interceptions generated by the Chargers.
Fumble Statistics
Ball security remained another storyline throughout the contest.
Both teams put the football on the ground multiple times, although neither suffered catastrophic consequences from fumbles alone.
Philadelphia
| Statistic | Value |
| Total Fumbles | 2 |
| Lost | 1 |
| Recovered | 3 |
Los Angeles
| Statistic | Value |
| Total Fumbles | 3 |
| Lost | 2 |
| Recovered | 2 |
While both offenses experienced moments of instability, the Chargers managed to overcome their mistakes because their defense consistently forced even more damaging turnovers.
Defensive Performance Analysis
Although the offensive statistics attract much of the attention, this game was ultimately defined by defensive execution.
Philadelphia’s pass rush dominated the line of scrimmage, while Los Angeles excelled in coverage and created game changing takeaways.
Each unit succeeded in different areas, making this one of the more balanced defensive contests of the season.
Philadelphia Eagles Defensive Statistics
| Category | Total |
| Total Tackles | 85 |
| Solo Tackles | 49 |
| Sacks | 7 |
| Tackles for Loss | 7 |
| Pass Deflections | 5 |
| Quarterback Hits | 11 |
The Eagles consistently pressured Justin Herbert throughout the evening.
Seven sacks and eleven quarterback hits demonstrate just how disruptive Philadelphia’s defensive front became.
Despite this dominance, the offense could not fully capitalize because repeated turnovers prevented the team from building momentum.
Chargers Defensive Statistics
| Category | Total |
| Total Tackles | 65 |
| Solo Tackles | 47 |
| Sacks | 1 |
| Tackles for Loss | 7 |
| Pass Deflections | 10 |
| Quarterback Hits | 6 |
Los Angeles generated only one sack, yet its secondary consistently disrupted passing lanes.
Ten pass deflections combined with four interceptions highlight outstanding coverage throughout the game.
Instead of relying on pressure alone, the Chargers won through disciplined positioning and excellent ball awareness.
Defensive Leaders
Individual performances also deserve recognition.
Reed Blankenship
Philadelphia’s leading tackler displayed consistency from start to finish.
| Statistic | Value |
| Total Tackles | 8 |
| Solo Tackles | 6 |
Blankenship frequently arrived first at the football and helped limit gains after the catch.
Daiyan Henley
Henley led the Chargers defensive effort with another efficient performance.
| Statistic | Value |
| Total Tackles | 7 |
| Solo Tackles | 6 |
His ability to diagnose running plays and contribute in coverage made him one of the Chargers’ most reliable defenders throughout the contest.
Defensive Comparison
Looking at the overall defensive production shows that each unit excelled in different situations.
Philadelphia dominated the pass rush.
Los Angeles dominated turnovers.
Both approaches proved effective, but forcing four interceptions ultimately had the greater impact on the final score.
Special Teams Performance
Special teams quietly became one of the deciding factors in this closely contested matchup. While offensive production received most of the attention, both kickers and punters consistently influenced field position throughout regulation and overtime.
The Chargers gained a significant advantage thanks to Cameron Dicker’s flawless kicking performance. Every scoring opportunity resulted in points, including the game winning field goal in overtime. Philadelphia’s Jake Elliott also performed well, but a missed field goal proved costly in a game decided by only three points.
Kicking Statistics
Philadelphia Eagles
Jake Elliott continued to demonstrate why he is regarded as one of the NFL’s most dependable kickers.
| Statistic | Value |
| Field Goals | 4 of 5 |
| Long Field Goal | 54 Yards |
| Extra Points | 1 of 1 |
| Total Points | 13 |
Converting four field goals kept Philadelphia within striking distance throughout the game. His 54 yard kick also highlighted his long range accuracy.
However, the single missed attempt became increasingly significant as the contest extended into overtime.
Los Angeles Chargers
Cameron Dicker delivered one of the most valuable individual performances of the evening.
| Statistic | Value |
| Field Goals | 5 of 5 |
| Long Field Goal | 54 Yards |
| Extra Points | 1 of 1 |
| Total Points | 16 |
A perfect five for five performance under pressure is difficult to overlook.
Every successful kick increased the Chargers’ confidence, and his overtime field goal ultimately secured the victory.
When examining the philadelphia eagles vs chargers match player stats, Dicker’s consistency stands out as one of the game’s defining factors.
Punting Performance
Field position remained important throughout the contest, making both punters valuable contributors.
Philadelphia Eagles
| Statistic | Value |
| Punts | 3 |
| Total Yards | 155 |
| Average | 51.7 |
| Long | 60 |
Braden Mann produced excellent hang time and distance, averaging more than fifty one yards per punt.
Los Angeles Chargers
| Statistic | Value |
| Punts | 5 |
| Total Yards | 256 |
| Average | 51.2 |
| Long | 57 |
JK Scott matched Mann’s consistency, helping Los Angeles consistently flip field position during defensive battles.
Both punters exceeded fifty one yards per punt on average, demonstrating impressive efficiency throughout the game.
Kick Return Statistics
Strong kick returns allowed both teams to begin drives with favorable field position.
Philadelphia Eagles
| Statistic | Value |
| Returns | 6 |
| Return Yards | 159 |
| Average | 26.5 |
| Long Return | 30 |
Philadelphia consistently gained solid starting position after kickoffs, averaging more than twenty six yards per return.
Los Angeles Chargers
| Statistic | Value |
| Returns | 7 |
| Return Yards | 167 |
| Average | 23.9 |
| Long Return | 28 |
The Chargers handled a slightly greater workload while maintaining dependable production.
Although neither team returned a kickoff for a touchdown, both special teams units consistently avoided costly mistakes.
Punt Return Statistics
Philadelphia Eagles
| Statistic | Value |
| Returns | 3 |
| Return Yards | 54 |
| Average | 18.0 |
| Long Return | 22 |
Philadelphia gained a noticeable advantage in punt returns by creating positive field position on multiple occasions.
Los Angeles Chargers
| Statistic | Value |
| Returns | 1 |
| Return Yards | -10 |
The Chargers struggled to generate production in the punt return game, largely because of Philadelphia’s effective coverage.
Team Statistics Comparison
Looking beyond individual performances provides a clearer picture of how evenly matched these teams were.
| Category | Philadelphia Eagles | Los Angeles Chargers |
| Final Score | 19 | 22 |
| Passing Yards | 240 | 139 |
| Team Rushing Yards | 134 | 169 |
| Total Receptions | 21 | 12 |
| Passing Touchdowns | 0 | 1 |
| Rushing Touchdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Interceptions Thrown | 4 | 1 |
| Team Sacks | 7 | 1 |
| Field Goals Made | 4 | 5 |
| Leading Rusher | Saquon Barkley 122 Yards | Justin Herbert 66 Yards |
| Leading Receiver | A.J. Brown 100 Yards | Kimani Vidal 60 Yards |
This comparison reveals an interesting contrast.
Philadelphia led several major statistical categories, including passing yards, receptions, sacks, and individual offensive performances.
Los Angeles, however, excelled in the categories that most directly influence winning close football games.
These included:
- Winning the turnover battle.
- Scoring the only passing touchdown.
- Producing more total rushing yards.
- Converting every field goal opportunity.
- Executing efficiently during overtime.
Why the Chargers Won
The final score alone does not fully explain how Los Angeles secured victory.
Several factors combined to determine the outcome.
Four Defensive Takeaways
The Chargers defense repeatedly ended promising Philadelphia drives.
Four interceptions created additional possessions and prevented the Eagles from converting yardage into points.
Perfect Kicking Performance
Cameron Dicker’s flawless accuracy ensured every scoring opportunity counted.
His overtime field goal ultimately became the winning points.
Effective Ball Control
Although the Chargers did not dominate through the air, their commitment to the running game helped control possession and reduce unnecessary risks.
Timely Execution
Los Angeles consistently performed well in high pressure situations.
Rather than chasing explosive plays, they accepted short gains, trusted their defense, and capitalized on Philadelphia’s mistakes.
Why Philadelphia Fell Short
The Eagles produced enough offense to win.
Unfortunately, several costly mistakes outweighed their statistical advantages.
Turnovers
Throwing four interceptions proved impossible to overcome against a disciplined defense.
Missed Opportunities
Philadelphia repeatedly crossed midfield but struggled to finish drives with touchdowns.
Defensive Effort Deserved Better
Recording seven sacks and limiting Justin Herbert to only 139 passing yards would normally position a team for victory.
Instead, offensive mistakes prevented the defense from receiving adequate support.
Offensive Balance Was Not Rewarded
Saquon Barkley rushed for more than one hundred twenty yards while A.J. Brown surpassed one hundred receiving yards.
Performances of that quality often lead to victories, but turnovers completely changed the game’s direction.
Biggest Individual Performances
Several players stood above the rest because of their impact on the outcome.
Saquon Barkley
Barkley delivered the game’s best offensive performance.
His combination of vision, patience, and explosive acceleration allowed Philadelphia to establish an effective rushing attack.
Cameron Dicker
No player contributed more points than Dicker.
His perfect kicking display accounted for sixteen points and included the game winner in overtime.
A.J. Brown
Brown remained Philadelphia’s most reliable receiving option throughout the contest, reaching the century mark despite constant defensive attention.
Chargers Secondary
Rather than relying on one standout defender, the entire secondary contributed.
Four different players intercepted passes, demonstrating outstanding communication and discipline in coverage.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Eagles and Chargers?
The Los Angeles Chargers defeated the Philadelphia Eagles 22 to 19 in overtime on December 8, 2025.
Who had the most rushing yards in the game?
Saquon Barkley led all players with 122 rushing yards on 20 carries while scoring one rushing touchdown.
How many interceptions did Jalen Hurts throw?
Jalen Hurts threw four interceptions during the game, which became one of the biggest factors in the Chargers’ victory.
Who was the leading receiver?
A.J. Brown led all receivers with six catches for 100 receiving yards.
Which quarterback threw a touchdown pass?
Justin Herbert threw the game’s only passing touchdown, while Jalen Hurts finished without a passing touchdown.
Who scored the most points?
Cameron Dicker led all scorers with 16 points after making all five field goal attempts and his extra point.
Conclusion
The philadelphia eagles vs chargers match player stats reveal far more than the final 22 to 19 overtime score. This matchup demonstrated how efficiency, discipline, and timely execution can outweigh advantages in total offensive production. Philadelphia generated more passing yards, recorded seven sacks, and received outstanding performances from Saquon Barkley and A.J. Brown, yet four costly interceptions prevented the Eagles from turning those strengths into a victory.
Los Angeles approached the game differently. The Chargers relied on balanced rushing, opportunistic defense, and flawless special teams to capitalize on every important moment. Cameron Dicker’s perfect kicking performance, combined with four interceptions by the Chargers’ defense, ultimately proved decisive in an evenly contested game.
From an analytical perspective, this contest serves as an excellent example of why raw yardage alone does not determine NFL outcomes. Winning the turnover battle, protecting field position, and executing under pressure often separate victory from defeat. For fans, coaches, and analysts, these statistics provide valuable insight into how every phase of the game contributed to one of the most competitive matchups of the season.
