San Antonio Spurs vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats
The san antonio spurs vs dallas mavericks match player stats from April 11, 2026, tell a much bigger story than the final score alone. San Antonio defeated Dallas 139-120 at Frost Bank Center, completing a 4-0 season-series sweep. The Spurs combined efficient shooting, superior rebounding, excellent free throw accuracy, and another dominant performance from Victor Wembanyama to control the game.
For anyone studying NBA box scores, this matchup is a useful example of why player statistics should be viewed together rather than as isolated numbers. Wembanyama’s 40 points and 13 rebounds immediately stand out, but De’Aaron Fox’s 10 assists, San Antonio’s 48 rebounds, and the team’s 54 percent field-goal shooting explain why the Spurs were able to create such a large offensive advantage.
Dallas still produced several strong individual performances. Cooper Flagg led the Mavericks with 33 points, Dwight Powell grabbed 11 rebounds, and Ryan Nembhard recorded seven assists. However, San Antonio received more production across several statistical categories, and that balance ultimately separated the teams.
San Antonio Spurs vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The matchup took place on April 11, 2026, at Frost Bank Center in San Antonio, Texas. The Spurs entered the game with a 62-19 record, including an impressive 32-7 mark at home. Dallas came in at 25-56 overall and 10-31 on the road.
San Antonio eventually won 139-120.
The quarter-by-quarter scoring shows that the Spurs established control early:
| Quarter | Dallas Mavericks | San Antonio Spurs |
| 1st | 26 | 37 |
| 2nd | 39 | 31 |
| 3rd | 28 | 40 |
| 4th | 27 | 31 |
| Final | 120 | 139 |
The 37-26 first quarter gave San Antonio an early 11-point advantage. Dallas responded with a strong 39-point second quarter, cutting into the deficit. That comeback attempt, however, did not last. San Antonio scored 40 points in the third quarter and rebuilt its advantage.
The final quarter then allowed the Spurs to maintain control rather than giving Dallas an opportunity to make another serious push.
The season-series result is also important. San Antonio won all four meetings against Dallas, making the matchup particularly one-sided from a season-long perspective.
Final Score and Team Statistical Comparison
A box score becomes more meaningful when the team totals are placed side by side.
| Statistic | Dallas Mavericks | San Antonio Spurs |
| Points | 120 | 139 |
| Field Goals | 45-98 | 50-92 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 46% | 54% |
| Three-Pointers | 15-40 | 13-32 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 38% | 41% |
| Free Throws | 15-19 | 26-27 |
| Free Throw Percentage | 79% | 96% |
| Rebounds | 35 | 48 |
| Assists | 26 | 30 |
| Turnovers | 7 | 10 |
| Steals | 7 | 4 |
| Blocks | 6 | 6 |
One of the clearest differences is shooting efficiency.
Dallas attempted 98 field goals and made 45, while San Antonio attempted 92 and made 50. That means the Spurs made five more field goals despite taking six fewer attempts.
That is an important distinction.
The Spurs were not simply winning because they shot more often. They were converting their opportunities at a higher rate.
San Antonio also had a major advantage at the free throw line. The Spurs converted 26 of 27 attempts, an exceptional 96 percent. Dallas went 15 for 19.
The rebounding margin is even more striking. San Antonio collected 48 rebounds compared with Dallas’s 35, giving the Spurs a 13-rebound advantage.
That extra possession potential, combined with superior shooting efficiency, helps explain the 19-point final margin.
Victor Wembanyama Leads San Antonio
The most important individual number in the matchup was Victor Wembanyama’s 40 points.
Wembanyama also led San Antonio with 13 rebounds, giving him a major impact on both ends of the floor. His statistical contribution was not limited to scoring.
A 40-point performance is significant in any NBA game, but the context matters. San Antonio scored 139 points as a team, meaning Wembanyama accounted for a substantial portion of the Spurs’ offense while also controlling the glass.
His 13 rebounds were also part of San Antonio’s 48 total rebounds.
This combination is what makes his performance especially important when examining the san antonio spurs vs dallas mavericks match player stats. A player who scores 40 points but contributes little elsewhere can have a very different overall impact from someone who scores 40 while also dominating rebounding and creating defensive pressure.
Wembanyama’s Offensive Impact
Wembanyama’s scoring performance forced Dallas to account for him throughout the game.
When a high-impact scorer attracts defensive attention, the value can extend beyond his own points. Defensive help can create passing lanes, open perimeter opportunities, and better driving angles for teammates.
San Antonio’s 30 assists suggest that the offense was not dependent on individual isolation possessions alone.
The Spurs were able to combine Wembanyama’s scoring presence with broader team ball movement.
Wembanyama on the Boards
His 13 rebounds were equally important.
Dallas finished with 35 rebounds as a team, while Wembanyama alone collected 13 for San Antonio. That gave the Spurs an important interior presence and contributed to their 48-35 team rebounding advantage.
Rebounding can sometimes be overlooked when a game features a 40-point scorer, but this was one of the statistical areas where San Antonio clearly separated itself.
De’Aaron Fox Controls the Offense
De’Aaron Fox recorded 10 assists for San Antonio.
Double-digit assists are important because they indicate that a player’s influence extended into the team’s offensive creation. Fox’s role complemented Wembanyama rather than competing with him for offensive responsibility.
The Spurs’ starting lineup included:
- Julian Champagnie
- Victor Wembanyama
- De’Aaron Fox
- Devin Vassell
- Dylan Harper
Fox’s 10 assists were particularly valuable because San Antonio finished with 30 assists overall.
That means one-third of the Spurs’ assists came from Fox.
The relationship between scoring and playmaking is one of the most useful elements to examine when analyzing NBA player statistics. Wembanyama provided the major scoring explosion, while Fox helped organize opportunities for teammates.
This balance makes the Spurs’ offensive performance more difficult to defend.
Dallas Mavericks Player Performance
Dallas did not leave the game without positive individual performances.
Cooper Flagg led the Mavericks with 33 points, making him the team’s primary offensive threat. His scoring output was substantial in a game where Dallas reached 120 points.
Dwight Powell led the Mavericks with 11 rebounds, while Ryan Nembhard finished with seven assists.
Those three statistical leaders reveal how Dallas distributed its strongest individual contributions:
| Category | Dallas Leader |
| Points | Cooper Flagg, 33 |
| Rebounds | Dwight Powell, 11 |
| Assists | Ryan Nembhard, 7 |
Flagg’s 33 points were especially important because Dallas scored 120 points overall. His offensive production gave the Mavericks a reliable scoring source, particularly during Dallas’s 39-point second quarter.
Cooper Flagg’s 33 Points
Flagg was Dallas’s leading scorer with 33 points.
The Mavericks needed that type of offensive production because San Antonio created a high-scoring environment. A 120-point total would normally represent an excellent offensive night, but San Antonio’s 139 points made it insufficient.
This is an important lesson when reading player stats: a strong individual scoring performance does not necessarily translate into a team victory.
Flagg’s 33 points were productive, but San Antonio had a 19-point advantage by the final buzzer.
Dwight Powell’s Rebounding
Dwight Powell collected 11 rebounds, leading Dallas in that category.
His rebounding performance helped the Mavericks compete on the glass, but the overall team numbers show the difference between the sides.
Dallas recorded 35 total rebounds.
San Antonio recorded 48.
Therefore, Powell’s individual rebounding effort was not enough to overcome the Spurs’ collective work on the boards.
Ryan Nembhard’s Playmaking
Ryan Nembhard led Dallas with seven assists.
Seven assists represent meaningful playmaking production, especially when paired with Dallas’s 26 total assists.
Nembhard’s role helped Dallas generate scoring opportunities, but San Antonio had a four-assist advantage as a team.
The Spurs finished with 30 assists.
That difference was not enormous, but it contributed to the broader picture of San Antonio’s offensive organization.
Starting Lineups
The starting lineups provide useful context for understanding each team’s approach.
Dallas Mavericks Starters
Dallas started:
- Khris Middleton
- Marvin Bagley III
- Cooper Flagg
- Max Christie
- Ryan Nembhard
Flagg was the leading scorer among the group, while Nembhard provided the primary assist production and Powell supplied the strongest rebounding contribution among Dallas players listed in the game data.
San Antonio Spurs Starters
San Antonio started:
- Julian Champagnie
- Victor Wembanyama
- De’Aaron Fox
- Devin Vassell
- Dylan Harper
This lineup combined Wembanyama’s interior and scoring presence with Fox’s playmaking ability.
The starting group also benefited from San Antonio’s overall shooting efficiency. The team made 50 of 92 field-goal attempts.
Bench Production Matters
The game also illustrates why looking only at starters can provide an incomplete picture.
Dallas received:
- Dwight Powell: 4 points and 11 rebounds
- AJ Johnson: 13 points
- John Poulakidas: 12 points
San Antonio’s bench leaders included:
- Keldon Johnson: 17 points
- Harrison Barnes: 15 points
- Carter Bryant: 12 points
San Antonio therefore had several meaningful scoring contributions outside Wembanyama and Fox.
Keldon Johnson’s 17 points were particularly useful because they provided additional scoring support behind the team’s primary stars.
Harrison Barnes added 15 points, while Carter Bryant contributed 12.
This type of secondary scoring can be critical in high-scoring NBA games. If a defense successfully limits the primary scorer, another player needs to provide enough offense to prevent the entire attack from slowing down.
San Antonio demonstrated that depth during this matchup.
Why San Antonio Scored 139 Points
The 139-point total was not the result of one statistical factor.
Several elements worked together.
1. Better Field-Goal Efficiency
San Antonio shot 54 percent from the field.
Dallas shot 46 percent.
The Spurs made 50 field goals on 92 attempts, while Dallas made 45 on 98 attempts.
That six-attempt difference is important because Dallas actually took more shots but converted fewer.
2. Free Throw Accuracy
San Antonio went 26 for 27 at the free throw line.
That is a 96 percent conversion rate.
Dallas converted 15 of 19.
The 11-point difference in made free throws represents a meaningful portion of the final 19-point margin.
3. Rebounding Advantage
San Antonio won the rebounding battle 48-35.
A 13-rebound advantage gives a team more opportunities to finish defensive possessions and potentially generate additional offensive possessions.
4. Strong Ball Movement
San Antonio recorded 30 assists.
That figure suggests a well-connected offensive performance rather than an attack built exclusively around individual scoring.
Fox’s 10 assists were a major part of that total.
5. Balanced Scoring
Wembanyama scored 40, but he was not the only Spurs player producing offense.
Keldon Johnson scored 17.
Harrison Barnes scored 15.
Carter Bryant scored 12.
The presence of multiple scoring contributors made San Antonio’s offense more difficult to contain.
Dallas’s 120 Points Were Not Enough
It would be easy to look at Dallas’s 120 points and conclude that the Mavericks played poorly offensively.
The box score does not support that simple interpretation.
Scoring 120 points is a strong offensive output in many NBA environments. Dallas also shot 38 percent from three-point range and 79 percent from the free throw line.
The main problem was that San Antonio was even more efficient and scored 19 more points.
Dallas’s 46 percent field-goal shooting was respectable, but San Antonio’s 54 percent was clearly better.
This is why matchup analysis should focus on relative performance rather than absolute numbers.
A team can score 120 points and still lose comfortably when the opponent reaches 139.
Three-Point Shooting Comparison
Three-point shooting was relatively competitive.
Dallas:
- 15 made
- 40 attempts
- 38 percent
San Antonio:
- 13 made
- 32 attempts
- 41 percent
Dallas actually made two more three-pointers.
That is an important detail because it shows that San Antonio’s victory was not driven by simply making more three-pointers.
Instead, the Spurs gained their edge through a combination of better overall field-goal efficiency, more free throws made, stronger rebounding, and interior production.
This is exactly why a complete box-score analysis is more useful than focusing on one popular statistic.
Turnovers and Possession Management
Dallas committed seven turnovers.
San Antonio committed 10.
On this specific metric, Dallas had the advantage.
That is another reason the final score cannot be explained by claiming San Antonio won every statistical category.
The Mavericks protected the ball effectively.
San Antonio’s three additional turnovers were a weakness in an otherwise efficient performance.
However, the Spurs compensated in other areas.
Their 48 rebounds, 54 percent shooting, 30 assists, and 26 made free throws outweighed the turnover disadvantage.
This is an excellent example of why basketball analysis requires multiple metrics.
San Antonio’s Defensive Numbers
The defensive statistics were also balanced in some areas.
Both teams recorded six blocks.
Dallas had seven steals compared with four for San Antonio.
Therefore, San Antonio did not dominate the traditional defensive counting stats across the board.
Instead, the Spurs’ defensive impact can also be understood through defensive rebounding and efficiency.
Holding Dallas to 46 percent shooting while scoring at 54 percent themselves created a major efficiency gap.
The Spurs did not need to win every defensive statistic to control the game.
What the Quarter Scores Reveal
The quarter breakdown provides one of the clearest narratives from the matchup.
San Antonio started with a 37-point first quarter.
Dallas answered with 39 points in the second, showing that the Mavericks could generate offense and briefly reduce the deficit.
The third quarter was decisive.
San Antonio scored 40 points while Dallas scored 28.
That 12-point difference essentially restored and expanded the Spurs’ control.
The fourth quarter finished 31-27 in San Antonio’s favor.
This sequence demonstrates that Dallas’s best scoring quarter was not enough to overcome San Antonio’s more consistent production.
The Importance of the 13-Rebound Margin
The 48-35 rebounding difference deserves special attention.
A 13-rebound margin is substantial.
Rebounding affects both sides of the possession battle. Defensive rebounds end an opponent’s offensive opportunity, while offensive rebounds can create additional chances for the team collecting them.
Even without detailed offensive and defensive rebounding splits, the total margin demonstrates that San Antonio controlled the glass collectively.
Wembanyama’s 13 rebounds were central to that performance.
The Meaning of the 4-0 Season Series
San Antonio’s 4-0 season-series record against Dallas adds another layer to the analysis.
One game can be influenced by shooting variance, injuries, unusual foul situations, or late-game circumstances.
Winning all four meetings provides a stronger indication that the Spurs consistently handled this particular matchup.
It does not automatically prove that San Antonio would beat Dallas in every future situation. Basketball outcomes remain dependent on roster availability, tactics, player development, and game conditions.
Still, a 4-0 season series is meaningful evidence of matchup superiority during that season.
How to Read NBA Player Stats More Effectively
For readers who regularly search for player statistics, this matchup provides a practical framework.
Start With the Team Result
First identify the final score and game context.
Here, San Antonio won 139-120.
Identify the Main Individual Contributors
Next, look at the leading scorers, rebounders, and assist leaders.
For this matchup:
- Wembanyama led San Antonio in scoring and rebounding.
- Fox led San Antonio in assists.
- Flagg led Dallas in scoring.
- Powell led Dallas in rebounds.
- Nembhard led Dallas in assists.
Compare Efficiency
Field-goal percentage often adds important context to scoring totals.
San Antonio shot 54 percent.
Dallas shot 46 percent.
Examine Possession-Related Statistics
Rebounds and turnovers help explain how teams create and protect possessions.
San Antonio had 48 rebounds and 10 turnovers.
Dallas had 35 rebounds and seven turnovers.
Look Beyond the Stars
Bench scoring can reveal whether a team received enough secondary production.
San Antonio’s bench leaders supplied 44 combined points among the three listed contributors, while Dallas’s three listed bench leaders produced 29 points.
That difference provides additional context for the final margin.
Key Statistical Takeaways
The most important numbers from the game can be summarized as follows:
- San Antonio won 139-120.
- The Spurs completed a 4-0 season-series sweep.
- Victor Wembanyama scored 40 points.
- Wembanyama also grabbed 13 rebounds.
- De’Aaron Fox recorded 10 assists.
- Cooper Flagg led Dallas with 33 points.
- Dwight Powell led Dallas with 11 rebounds.
- Ryan Nembhard led Dallas with seven assists.
- San Antonio shot 54 percent from the field.
- Dallas shot 46 percent.
- San Antonio made 26 of 27 free throws.
- Dallas made 15 of 19 free throws.
- San Antonio outrebounded Dallas 48-35.
- The Spurs recorded 30 assists compared with Dallas’s 26.
- Both teams recorded six blocks.
- Dallas had seven steals compared with San Antonio’s four.
Together, these statistics explain why the game ended with a 19-point San Antonio victory.
What This Matchup Teaches About Basketball Analysis
One of the biggest mistakes in sports-stat analysis is reducing an entire game to its leading scorer.
Wembanyama’s 40 points were spectacular, but they were only one part of the story.
San Antonio won because several statistical advantages aligned.
The Spurs shot more efficiently.
They dominated the rebounding battle.
They made nearly every free throw.
They generated more assists.
They received strong secondary scoring.
Dallas also had an effective offensive night, but its 46 percent shooting and 35 rebounds were not enough to match San Antonio’s overall efficiency.
The most useful analysis therefore connects individual statistics with team-level outcomes.
A Practical Box Score Checklist
When analyzing a future NBA matchup, use this checklist:
- Record the final score.
- Check the starting lineups.
- Identify leading scorers.
- Compare field-goal percentages.
- Compare three-point efficiency.
- Check free throw attempts and percentage.
- Compare total rebounds.
- Review assists and turnovers.
- Check steals and blocks.
- Review bench production.
- Examine quarter-by-quarter scoring.
- Consider the broader season-series context.
This approach prevents one statistic from dominating the entire interpretation.
San Antonio Spurs vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats: Overall Assessment
The san antonio spurs vs dallas mavericks match player stats show a matchup in which San Antonio combined elite individual production with strong team execution.
Victor Wembanyama was the headline performer with 40 points and 13 rebounds. De’Aaron Fox added 10 assists, helping organize an offense that finished with 30 total assists.
Dallas had its own standout performance from Cooper Flagg, who scored 33 points. Dwight Powell’s 11 rebounds and Ryan Nembhard’s seven assists also gave the Mavericks meaningful individual contributions.
But the team comparison favored San Antonio in several critical areas.
The Spurs shot 54 percent from the field compared with Dallas’s 46 percent. They outrebounded the Mavericks 48-35 and converted 26 of 27 free throws. They also scored 40 points in the third quarter, responding decisively after Dallas’s 39-point second period.
The result was a 139-120 victory and a 4-0 season-series sweep.
For anyone studying san antonio spurs vs dallas mavericks match player stats, the main lesson is that individual numbers become much more informative when placed inside the complete team context. Wembanyama’s scoring, Fox’s playmaking, the Spurs’ rebounding, and their shooting efficiency all worked together to produce the final result.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the top scorer in the game?
Victor Wembanyama was the top scorer, finishing with 40 points for San Antonio. Cooper Flagg led Dallas with 33 points.
Who led the game in rebounds?
Victor Wembanyama led the game with 13 rebounds. Dwight Powell was Dallas’s top rebounder with 11.
Who had the most assists?
De’Aaron Fox led all listed players with 10 assists for San Antonio. Ryan Nembhard led Dallas with seven assists.
What was the final score?
San Antonio defeated Dallas 139-120 at Frost Bank Center on April 11, 2026.
Which team shot better?
San Antonio shot 54 percent from the field and 41 percent from three-point range. Dallas shot 46 percent overall and 38 percent from three-point range.
Did San Antonio win the season series?
Yes. San Antonio won all four meetings against Dallas during the season, finishing the series with a 4-0 record.
Conclusion
The April 11, 2026 matchup was a strong example of how a team can win through several complementary statistical advantages rather than relying on a single category.
Victor Wembanyama’s 40-point, 13-rebound performance was the centerpiece, while De’Aaron Fox’s 10 assists helped keep San Antonio’s offense organized. Dallas received 33 points from Cooper Flagg, 11 rebounds from Dwight Powell, and seven assists from Ryan Nembhard, but those performances could not overcome San Antonio’s overall efficiency.
The biggest team differences were clear: San Antonio shot 54 percent compared with Dallas’s 46 percent, won the rebounding battle 48-35, made 26 of 27 free throws, and produced 30 assists.
The 139-120 result therefore reflects more than a high-scoring Spurs offense. It reflects efficient shooting, rebounding control, strong playmaking, and contributions from multiple players. The 4-0 season-series sweep further reinforces how effectively San Antonio handled this matchup during the season.
For readers reviewing the san antonio spurs vs dallas mavericks match player stats, the complete box score provides a much more useful picture than the headline score or one player’s point total alone.
