Oklahoma City Thunder vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats

The oklahoma city thunder vs dallas mavericks match player stats from March 2, 2026, tell a clear story of defensive control, efficient scoring, and superior ball security. Oklahoma City defeated Dallas 100-87 at American Airlines Center, improving to 47-15 while extending its season series advantage to 3-0. The Mavericks fell to 21-39 after another difficult result against the Thunder.

This was not simply a game decided by one outstanding scorer. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander led Oklahoma City with 30 points, but Chet Holmgren added 19 points and 9 rebounds, while Isaiah Joe provided 14 points off the supporting group. The Thunder also forced Dallas into 17 turnovers and recorded nine steals.

Dallas had several productive individual performances. Caleb Martin scored 18 points, while Brandon Williams, Max Christie, and other contributors helped keep the Mavericks competitive. However, Dallas struggled to generate consistent offense, shooting only 39% from the field.

The final score was Oklahoma City Thunder 100, Dallas Mavericks 87.

Oklahoma City Thunder vs Dallas Mavericks Match Player Stats

The individual numbers provide the best starting point for understanding how this game developed. Oklahoma City combined star production with contributions across its rotation, while Dallas relied heavily on several secondary scorers.

Oklahoma City Thunder Player Statistics

Player	PTS	REB	AST	TO	STL	BLK	FG
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander	30	4	5	3	4	0	12-20
Chet Holmgren	19	9	1	2	2	2	8-14
Isaiah Joe	14	5	0	0	0	0	5-9
Jared McCain	11	1	1	0	0	0	5-11
Isaiah Hartenstein	7	5	4	0	1	2	3-8
Aaron Wiggins	6	0	0	0	1	0	2-7
Luguentz Dort	5	4	0	0	0	0	2-6
Cason Wallace	4	6	8	1	1	1	2-7
Alex Caruso	4	6	1	1	0	1	1-5
Jaylin Williams	0	5	2	1	0	2	Not listed
Kenrich Williams	0	1	0	0	0	0	Not listed

The Thunder’s statistical profile was balanced. Gilgeous-Alexander supplied the headline scoring, but the team’s defensive activity and passing were equally important.

Dallas Mavericks Player Statistics

Player	PTS	REB	AST	TO	STL	BLK	FG
Caleb Martin	18	3	0	1	1	0	6-11
Brandon Williams	14	3	3	1	0	0	5-12
Max Christie	14	7	0	2	2	0	5-11
Dwight Powell	9	9	2	1	1	1	4-5
Daniel Gafford	8	7	2	1	1	0	3-9
Klay Thompson	7	0	1	2	0	0	3-8
Ryan Nembhard	7	2	5	5	0	0	2-9
AJ Johnson	6	4	4	1	1	0	3-9
Khris Middleton	4	2	3	1	0	0	2-10
Moussa Cisse	0	12	0	2	0	0	Not listed

Dallas had several players reach double figures, but the offense lacked the overall efficiency needed to match Oklahoma City.

Game Summary: Thunder 100, Mavericks 87

Oklahoma City started strongly and established control during the opening period.

The Thunder scored 36 points in the first quarter while Dallas managed 25. That nine-point advantage became an important foundation for the rest of the game.

The second quarter was much closer. Oklahoma City scored 22 points, while Dallas answered with 24. Even though the Mavericks won the quarter, they did not erase the early deficit.

At halftime, Oklahoma City maintained its advantage.

The Thunder then scored 25 points in the third quarter and held Dallas to 20. That five-point swing gave Oklahoma City additional separation before the final period.

The fourth quarter was relatively even. Oklahoma City scored 17 points and Dallas scored 18.

The quarter-by-quarter scoring was:

Quarter	Oklahoma City	Dallas
1st	36	25
2nd	22	24
3rd	25	20
4th	17	18
Total	100	87

The numbers show why the first and third quarters were so important. Dallas was competitive in the second and fourth periods, but could not overcome Oklahoma City’s stronger stretches.

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander Leads Oklahoma City

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander was the biggest individual offensive factor in the game.

He finished with 30 points, 4 rebounds, 5 assists, and 4 steals<span style=”font-weight: 400;”>. He shot 12-of-20 from the field, giving him a 60% field-goal rate based on the supplied box score.

Also he made 5 of 6 free throws.</span>

His three-point shooting was less effective. He made only 1 of 5 attempts from beyond the arc. However, that did not prevent him from producing an efficient overall scoring night.

His final statistical line was:

• 30 points
• 4 rebounds
• 5 assists
• 4 steals
• 3 turnovers
• 12-of-20 field goals
• 1-of-5 three-pointers
• 5-of-6 free throws
• +13 plus/minus

The four steals stand out because they demonstrate how his impact extended beyond scoring.

A 30-point performance can attract most of the attention, but the combination of scoring, playmaking, and defensive disruption made his contribution much broader.

His +13 plus/minus also showed that Oklahoma City performed well during his minutes.

Chet Holmgren Provides Two-Way Impact

Chet Holmgren was another major factor for Oklahoma City.

He recorded 19 points and 9 rebounds, finishing just one rebound short of a double-double.

His defensive numbers were particularly useful. Holmgren recorded 2 steals and 2 blocks, giving him four combined defensive plays in the supplied statistics.

He shot 8-of-14 from the field.

That represents a 57.1% field-goal rate.

Holmgren’s three-point shooting was not a major part of his offensive success. He made 1 of 5 attempts from deep and converted both of his free throws.

His +13 plus/minus matched Gilgeous-Alexander’s mark.

The important point is that Holmgren did not need to lead the Thunder in scoring to have a major influence. His rebounding, rim protection, and efficient interior scoring complemented the team’s lead guard.

Isaiah Joe Adds Important Scoring

Isaiah Joe gave Oklahoma City another efficient scoring option.

He finished with 14 points, 5 rebounds, and no turnovers.

His shooting line was particularly impressive:

• 5-of-9 field goals
• 3-of-7 three-pointers
• 1-of-1 free throws

His three-point percentage was 42.9%.

Joe’s 3-of-7 shooting from outside helped compensate for the Thunder’s overall struggles from three-point range.

Oklahoma City finished only 8-of-39 from beyond the arc, or approximately 20.5%.

That makes Joe’s outside shooting even more valuable within the context of the game.

Cason Wallace’s Passing Stands Out

Cason Wallace scored only 4 points, but judging his game purely by scoring would miss one of the most useful supporting performances.

Wallace recorded 8 assists, which was the highest assist total among the supplied Oklahoma City players.

He also collected 6 rebounds, 1 steal, and 1 block.

Most importantly, he committed only 1 turnover.

That combination gave Oklahoma City a reliable secondary ball-handler who helped keep possessions organized.

The Thunder finished with 22 assists and only 8 turnovers as a team. Wallace’s 8 assists were therefore a major part of the team’s overall ball movement.

Isaiah Hartenstein Adds Rebounding and Interior Defense

Isaiah Hartenstein produced a well-rounded line with:

• 7 points
• 5 rebounds
• 4 assists
• 1 steal
• 2 blocks
• 0 turnovers

He shot 3-of-8 from the field.

The most interesting element is the combination of four assists and two blocks.

Hartenstein contributed as a passer while also providing interior defensive value.

His zero turnovers were another positive element.

The Thunder did not need every player to score heavily. Several players contributed in other ways, which helped create a balanced team performance.

Dallas Mavericks Scoring Leaders

Caleb Martin was Dallas’ leading scorer with 18 points.

He shot 6-of-11 from the field and 3-of-5 from three-point range.

That gave him a 54.5% field-goal rate and a 60% three-point rate.

Martin also converted 3 of 6 free throws.

His scoring was one of the strongest individual offensive performances for Dallas, but his -10 plus/minus reflected the Mavericks’ overall difficulty during his minutes.

Brandon Williams and Max Christie each scored 14 points.

Williams finished 5-of-12 from the field and made all four of his free throws.

Christie also scored 14 points, adding 7 rebounds and 2 steals. He shot 5-of-11 overall and 4-of-8 from three-point range.

Christie’s outside shooting was particularly useful because Dallas made 9 of 31 three-point attempts as a team.

Dwight Powell Provides Efficient Interior Production

Dwight Powell had an efficient offensive game for Dallas.

He scored 9 points on 4-of-5 shooting.

He also collected 9 rebounds, recorded 2 assists, 1 steal, and 1 block.

His shooting percentage was 80% from the field.

Powell’s performance demonstrates an important difference between individual efficiency and team efficiency. One player can shoot extremely well while the team still struggles because of inefficient production elsewhere.

Dallas finished at only 39% from the field overall.

Powell’s rebounding also helped Dallas win the overall rebounding battle.

Moussa Cisse Controls the Offensive Glass

Moussa Cisse did not score, but his rebounding numbers deserve attention.

He grabbed 12 rebounds, the highest total for any player in the supplied game data.

That included part of Dallas’ nine offensive rebounds as a team.

Cisse’s +1 plus/minus was also the only positive plus/minus among the listed Dallas contributors apart from Ryan Nembhard’s +1.

This is a good example of why box-score analysis should not focus exclusively on points.

A zero-point performance can still influence possessions through rebounding and defensive work.

Oklahoma City’s Defensive Advantage

One of the clearest themes in the oklahoma city thunder vs dallas mavericks match player stats is defensive activity.

The Thunder recorded:

• 9 steals
• 8 blocks
• 8 turnovers committed
• 17 personal fouls

Dallas recorded:

• 6 steals
• 1 block
• 17 turnovers
• 18 personal fouls

The turnover difference was significant.

Oklahoma City committed fewer than half as many turnovers as Dallas.

That gave the Thunder a major possession-management advantage.

The Thunder also recorded eight blocks compared with one from Dallas.

That 7-block difference shows how much more disruptive Oklahoma City was around the basket.

Turnovers Were a Major Difference

Dallas committed 17 turnovers, while Oklahoma City committed only 8.

That nine-turnover difference is one of the strongest statistical explanations for the final result.

Turnovers do more than reduce a team’s own scoring opportunities. They can also create transition chances for the opponent.

Oklahoma City’s nine steals further support this point.

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander alone produced four steals.

Chet Holmgren added two.

Other Thunder players also contributed to the defensive pressure.

Dallas’ highest individual turnover total came from Ryan Nembhard, who committed five turnovers while recording five assists.

That creates an interesting statistical contrast.

Nembhard was one of Dallas’ better passers, but his five turnovers reduced the value of that playmaking.

Shooting Comparison

The team shooting numbers were:

Category	Thunder	Mavericks
Field Goals	41-92	33-85
Field Goal %	45%	39%
Three-Pointers	8-39	9-31
Three-Point %	21%	29%
Free Throws	10-15	12-16
Free Throw %	67%	75%

Dallas actually shot better from three-point range and from the free-throw line.

However, Oklahoma City was considerably better from the field overall.

The Thunder made eight more field goals than Dallas.

That difference outweighed Dallas’ advantage in three-point percentage.

Oklahoma City’s 45% field-goal rate compared with Dallas’ 39%.

The Thunder also attempted seven more field goals.

Those additional attempts mattered because Dallas had to overcome both an efficiency disadvantage and a turnover disadvantage.

Rebounding Comparison

Dallas finished with 49 rebounds compared with 46 for Oklahoma City.

That gives the Mavericks a three-rebound advantage.

The team totals were:

Rebounding Category	Thunder	Mavericks
Total Rebounds	46	49
Offensive Rebounds	7	9
Defensive Rebounds	39	40

This is important because the Mavericks did not lose the game because they were dominated on the glass.

In fact, Dallas won the rebounding battle.

Moussa Cisse had 12 rebounds, while Dwight Powell added 9 and Daniel Gafford collected 7.

The Thunder received 9 rebounds from Holmgren, while Wallace and Caruso each had 6.

The broader lesson is that rebounding alone could not offset Dallas’ shooting and turnover problems.

Passing and Ball Movement

Oklahoma City finished with 22 assists.

Dallas had 20.

The two teams were relatively close in total assists, but their turnover numbers were very different.

This creates a useful efficiency distinction.

The Thunder produced:

22 assists with 8 turnovers.

Dallas produced:

20 assists with 17 turnovers.

The difference is striking.

Cason Wallace led Oklahoma City with 8 assists and only 1 turnover.

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander added 5 assists.

Hartenstein contributed 4 assists.

For Dallas, Ryan Nembhard had 5 assists but also 5 turnovers. AJ Johnson had 4 assists with 1 turnover, while Khris Middleton recorded 3 assists.

The Thunder therefore achieved better ball security while maintaining a similar level of assisted offense.

Quarter-by-Quarter Tactical Breakdown

First Quarter: Oklahoma City Sets the Tone

The opening quarter was the most important scoring period.

Oklahoma City scored 36 points.

Dallas scored 25.

That 11-point difference gave the Thunder early control.

The Thunder’s ability to score efficiently while generating defensive pressure prevented Dallas from establishing a comfortable offensive rhythm.

Second Quarter: Dallas Responds

Dallas won the second quarter 24-22.

This was a positive response from the Mavericks.

However, the two-point advantage was not enough to eliminate the first-quarter deficit.

Oklahoma City entered halftime with control of the game.

Third Quarter: Thunder Reassert Control

The third quarter became another important separation period.

Oklahoma City scored 25 points while Dallas managed 20.

The Thunder added another five points to their advantage.

This prevented Dallas from turning its second-quarter improvement into a sustained comeback.

Fourth Quarter: Dallas Finishes Stronger

Dallas scored 18 points in the fourth quarter.

Oklahoma City scored 17.

The Mavericks therefore won the final quarter by one point.

But by that stage, the damage from the earlier quarters was too significant.

This is an important part of interpreting the final score. Dallas was not completely outplayed for all 48 minutes. Oklahoma City simply built advantages during the periods that mattered most.

Plus/Minus Analysis

Plus/minus can be useful when interpreted alongside the rest of the box score.

For Oklahoma City, several players posted strong numbers:

• Shai Gilgeous-Alexander: +13
• Chet Holmgren: +13
• Luguentz Dort: +11
• Isaiah Hartenstein: +10
• Cason Wallace: +8
• Aaron Wiggins: +4
• Alex Caruso: +4
• Jaylin Williams: +4

Kenrich Williams was listed at -1.

For Dallas, the supplied figures included:

• Moussa Cisse: +1
• Ryan Nembhard: +1
• AJ Johnson: 0
• Dwight Powell: -4
• Klay Thompson: -3
• Daniel Gafford: -9
• Caleb Martin: -10
• Max Christie: -12
• Brandon Williams: -14
• Khris Middleton: -15

The distribution shows how consistently Oklahoma City’s main rotation pieces performed during their minutes.

Dallas had fewer positive plus/minus results despite several players posting respectable offensive numbers.

Why the Thunder Won

Several factors explain Oklahoma City’s 13-point victory.

1. Superior Field-Goal Efficiency

The Thunder shot 45% from the field.

Dallas shot 39%.

That six-percentage-point difference was significant.

2. Much Better Ball Security

Oklahoma City committed only 8 turnovers.

Dallas committed 17.

The nine-turnover difference was one of the game’s clearest statistical advantages.

3. Defensive Disruption

The Thunder recorded 9 steals and 8 blocks.

Dallas had 6 steals and only 1 block.

The Thunder generated far more defensive events.

4. Star Production

Gilgeous-Alexander scored 30 points on 12-of-20 shooting.

Holmgren added 19 points on 8-of-14 shooting.

That gave Oklahoma City a reliable scoring foundation.

5. Balanced Supporting Contributions

Isaiah Joe scored 14 points.

Jared McCain scored 11.

Wallace provided 8 assists.

Hartenstein contributed 7 points, 5 rebounds, 4 assists, and 2 blocks.

The Thunder did not rely entirely on one scorer.

Why Dallas Lost

Dallas had enough individual production to stay competitive, but several team-level issues worked against them.

Inefficient Overall Shooting

The Mavericks made only 33 of 85 field-goal attempts.

That produced a 39% field-goal rate.

Too Many Turnovers

Seventeen turnovers were costly against a Thunder team that recorded nine steals.

Limited Rim Protection

Dallas recorded only one block.

Oklahoma City recorded eight.

That difference suggests the Thunder were much more effective at disrupting attempts around the basket.

Slow Start

The 36-25 first quarter put Dallas behind immediately.

The Mavericks responded, but the early deficit remained important throughout the game.

What the Team Totals Reveal

The team totals provide a broader perspective than individual player lines.

Oklahoma City recorded:

• 100 points
• 41-of-92 field goals
• 8-of-39 three-pointers
• 10-of-15 free throws
• 46 rebounds
• 22 assists
• 8 turnovers
• 9 steals
• 8 blocks

Dallas recorded:

• 87 points
• 33-of-85 field goals
• 9-of-31 three-pointers
• 12-of-16 free throws
• 49 rebounds
• 20 assists
• 17 turnovers
• 6 steals
• 1 block

The most important numbers are not necessarily the largest ones.

The Thunder’s three-point shooting was poor at 21%, yet they still won comfortably.

That happened because they compensated with better overall field-goal efficiency, defensive activity, and ball security.

Dallas shot 29% from three and 75% from the free-throw line, but those advantages were not enough.

A Deeper Look at Shot Efficiency

One useful way to interpret the box score is to separate volume from efficiency.

Oklahoma City attempted 92 field goals.

Dallas attempted 85.

The Thunder made 41.

Dallas made 33.

That means Oklahoma City generated seven more attempts and converted eight more field goals.

Dallas did have a better three-point percentage.

However, three-point efficiency alone did not define the game.

Oklahoma City’s interior and mid-range scoring efficiency helped offset the poor long-range shooting.

Gilgeous-Alexander’s 12-of-20 shooting was particularly important because it provided efficient high-volume scoring without requiring the Thunder to make a large percentage of their three-point attempts.

Individual Matchup: Gilgeous-Alexander vs Dallas Defense

Gilgeous-Alexander’s 30-point performance placed constant pressure on Dallas.

He made 60% of his field-goal attempts.

He also reached the free-throw line six times.

His five assists showed that Dallas could not simply focus on preventing his scoring.

When a primary scorer can both score and create opportunities for teammates, defensive pressure becomes harder to sustain.

His four steals added another layer to his performance.

This was therefore a complete star performance rather than a scoring-only display.

Individual Matchup: Holmgren’s Interior Presence

Holmgren’s 19 points were supported by 9 rebounds and 2 blocks.

That combination helped Oklahoma City control the defensive interior.

Dallas had good rebounding numbers overall, but the Mavericks did not match Holmgren’s defensive impact.

The 8-1 team block difference is particularly significant.

Holmgren’s presence allowed Oklahoma City to challenge shots without needing every possession to become a perimeter defensive battle.

The Importance of Supporting Players

A common mistake when reading NBA box scores is focusing only on the leading scorer.

This game provides a strong example of why supporting players matter.

Wallace had only 4 points but produced 8 assists and 6 rebounds.

Hartenstein had 7 points but added 4 assists and 2 blocks.

Joe scored 14 points while making 3 of 7 three-point attempts.

Caruso scored 4 points but contributed 6 rebounds and a block.

These contributions made the Thunder more difficult to defend.

The team had multiple players filling different roles.

Dallas Had Useful Individual Performances

The Mavericks should not be judged only by the final score.

Caleb Martin had 18 points on efficient shooting.

Max Christie scored 14 points and made 4 of 8 three-pointers.

Brandon Williams scored 14 points.

Powell shot 4-of-5 and grabbed 9 rebounds.

Cisse collected 12 rebounds.

These numbers show that Dallas had several productive individual performances.

The problem was that those contributions did not combine into an efficient team offense.

The 17 turnovers and 39% overall field-goal rate were difficult to overcome.

Season Series Context

The supplied data lists Oklahoma City as winning the season series 3-0 against Dallas.

That makes the result more significant than a single isolated game.

A 3-0 season series indicates that Oklahoma City consistently found ways to solve the matchup.

Dallas therefore entered this game with a difficult challenge.

The March 2 result continued that trend rather than reversing it.

Home and Away Records

The Thunder entered the game with a 47-15 overall record and a 22-8 away record.

Dallas entered at 21-39 overall and 14-19 at home.

Those records provide context for the result.

Oklahoma City had already demonstrated strong road performance.

Dallas had struggled to turn home games into consistent wins.

The final result followed those broader season patterns.

What Fans Can Learn From the Box Score

The biggest lesson from these oklahoma city thunder vs dallas mavericks match player stats is that winning basketball is rarely about one category.

Oklahoma City did not dominate every statistical area.

Dallas actually had more rebounds.

Dallas also shot better from three and from the free-throw line.

Yet Oklahoma City won by 13 points.

Why?

Because the Thunder performed better in several high-impact areas at the same time.

• They shot better overall.
• They protected the ball.
• They created turnovers.
• They protected the rim.
• They received efficient scoring from their leading players.
• They also maintained strong assist-to-turnover balance.

That combination created a more complete performance.

Official Basketball Data and Verification

For readers who want to compare this box score with broader league information, the official NBA platform is a useful reference for schedules, statistics, standings, and player information. NBA.com

The player statistics and team totals analyzed in this article are based on the supplied game data for March 2, 2026.

Frequently Asked Questions

Who led the Thunder in scoring against the Mavericks?

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander led Oklahoma City with 30 points. He shot 12-of-20 from the field and added 5 assists and 4 steals.

Who was Oklahoma City’s second-leading scorer?

Chet Holmgren scored 19 points. He also recorded 9 rebounds, 2 steals, and 2 blocks.

Who led Dallas in scoring?

Caleb Martin led the Mavericks with 18 points. He shot 6-of-11 from the field and 3-of-5 from three-point range.

How many turnovers did each team commit?

Oklahoma City committed 8 turnovers, while Dallas committed 17 turnovers.

Which team won the rebounding battle?

Dallas won the rebounding battle 49-46. The Mavericks also had a 9-7 advantage in offensive rebounds.

What was the final score?

The Oklahoma City Thunder defeated the Dallas Mavericks 100-87 on March 2, 2026, at American Airlines Center in Dallas.

Conclusion

The oklahoma city thunder vs dallas mavericks match player stats show why Oklahoma City controlled the game despite struggling from three-point range.

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander delivered the headline performance with 30 points, while Chet Holmgren added 19 points and 9 rebounds. Isaiah Joe provided efficient perimeter scoring, and Cason Wallace supplied eight assists with only one turnover.

Dallas received strong individual efforts from Caleb Martin, Brandon Williams, Max Christie, Dwight Powell, and Moussa Cisse. The Mavericks also won the rebounding battle and shot better from three-point range.

However, the Thunder were more efficient from the field and much more secure with the ball. Oklahoma City’s 45% shooting, 8 turnovers, 9 steals, and 8 blocks created a statistical profile that was difficult for Dallas to overcome.

The 36-25 first quarter gave Oklahoma City an early advantage. The Thunder then added separation in the third quarter by outscoring Dallas 25-20. Although Dallas won the second and fourth quarters, those smaller advantages could not erase the earlier deficit.

The final 100-87 score reflected a game in which Oklahoma City combined star power with defensive pressure, passing, and disciplined possession management. The 3-0 season-series record further underlined the Thunder’s success in this matchup.