Mets vs Phillies Match Player Stats - The Queens Lovely Things

The mets vs phillies match player stats from June 19, 2026, tell the story of a competitive game at Citizens Bank Park where the New York Mets defeated the Philadelphia Phillies 6-4. The Mets collected 11 hits and two home runs, while the Phillies finished with seven hits and no home runs. Despite Philadelphia winning the three-game series 2-1, New York took the final game by converting key opportunities into runs and producing enough late offense to hold off the Phillies.

The game featured several important individual performances. J. Soto hit two home runs for the Mets and finished with two RBI. M. Semien added two RBI and delivered a two-run triple in the seventh inning. For Philadelphia, A. Bohm drove in two runs and recorded both a single and a double. On the mound, S. Manaea and A. Nola both worked five or more innings, while the Mets bullpen ultimately protected the lead through the final innings.

For anyone researching Mets and Phillies player statistics, this game offers more than a simple final score. The box score shows how hits, extra-base hits, pitching efficiency, errors, runners in scoring position, and late-inning execution combined to determine the result.

Table of Contents

mets vs phillies match player stats at a glance

The final score was Mets 6, Phillies 4.

The game was played on June 19, 2026, at Citizens Bank Park in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, with an attendance of 39,767. The listed game time was 3 hours and 9 minutes.

Category	New York Mets	Philadelphia Phillies
Runs	6	4
Hits	11	7
Errors	3	1
Home Runs	2	0
RBI	6	4
At Bats	38	34
Walks	3	3
Strikeouts	9	10
RISP	2-7	4-14
Left on Base	8	7
Total Pitching IP	9.0	9.0
Earned Runs Allowed	2	5

One of the clearest differences in the box score is the combination of power and total hits. New York had four more hits than Philadelphia and hit two home runs. Philadelphia did not record a home run, meaning all four of its runs came through other offensive sequences.

The Mets also overcame three errors, compared with one Philadelphia error. That makes the 6-4 result particularly useful to analyze because New York did not win simply by playing a mistake-free game. Instead, its offense and pitching were strong enough to offset the defensive miscues.

How the Mets built the six-run total

New York’s scoring was spread across several innings, but J. Soto immediately established himself as one of the central figures in the game.

Soto hit a home run in the first inning and another in the third. Those two home runs accounted for a major part of the Mets’ offensive production and gave New York an early power advantage.

A.J. Ewing also contributed with an RBI double in the opening inning. Later, M. Semien delivered a two-run triple in the seventh inning, giving the Mets an important burst of offense during the middle-late stages of the game.

The supplied scoring summary lists the Mets’ scoring events as follows:

J. Soto home run in the first inning
A.J. Ewing RBI double in the first inning
J. Soto home run in the third inning
M. Semien two-run triple in the seventh inning
M. Semien was credited with two RBI overall

The Mets also recorded an RBI single from Wagaman in the seventh inning according to the supplied scoring summary.

The overall pattern is important. New York did not depend on one type of offensive play. The club combined home-run power, doubles, a triple, and run-producing singles.

That variety helped produce 11 hits and six runs.

J. Soto’s two-home-run performance

Soto was the most obvious power contributor in the supplied Mets statistics.

His two home runs came in the first and third innings. He also finished with two RBI.

Two home runs in a single game can dramatically change how a pitching staff approaches the middle of a lineup. In this particular game, Soto’s production gave the Mets early scoring opportunities and helped establish a lead before Philadelphia’s offense could fully respond.

The important statistical point is that Soto’s contribution was not simply measured by total bases. The timing of the home runs mattered as well.

His first home run came in the first inning, immediately putting pressure on Philadelphia’s pitching. His second came in the third, reinforcing New York’s offensive advantage.

Because the supplied data does not include his complete plate appearance breakdown, such as walks, strikeouts, or total bases, those statistics should not be assumed beyond the information provided.

M. Semien provides the late offensive push

Semien played another major role in the Mets’ offensive production.

The supplied statistics credit Semien with two RBI and a triple. His two-run triple came in the seventh inning, which was one of the game’s most important scoring sequences.

Extra-base hits are especially valuable in close games because they can move runners multiple bases with one swing. In this case, Semien’s triple produced two runs and helped New York extend its advantage.

The seventh inning therefore stands out as a turning point in the scoring summary.

Instead of relying exclusively on the home runs hit earlier by Soto, the Mets generated another significant scoring burst late in the game.

That balance is one of the strongest features of the offensive box score.

A.J. Ewing’s contribution

A.J. Ewing recorded a double that drove in a run.

The double came during the first inning, when the Mets were already creating pressure against Philadelphia’s starter.

Extra-base hits such as doubles and triples are important when evaluating offensive efficiency because they can generate scoring chances without requiring several consecutive singles.

Ewing’s RBI double helped New York take advantage of an early opportunity and contributed to the team’s 11-hit performance.

Other Mets offensive statistics

The supplied Mets batting line shows:

38 at bats
6 runs
11 hits
6 RBI
2 home runs
3 walks
9 strikeouts
1 stolen base
8 runners left on base
2-for-7 with runners in scoring position

Benge recorded the Mets’ stolen base.

The 11-hit total was the highest offensive hit count between the two teams. New York also produced two home runs, a double, and a triple.

At the same time, the 2-for-7 performance with runners in scoring position shows that the Mets did not convert every opportunity. They left eight runners on base.

This is an important distinction when reading a box score. A team can score six runs while still leaving several potential scoring opportunities unused.

Philadelphia Phillies offensive performance

Philadelphia scored four runs on seven hits.

Bohm was one of the most productive Phillies hitters, driving in two runs and recording a double. The supplied scoring summary credits Bohm with an RBI single and later an RBI double.
Sosa added a triple, while D. Hill and J. Crawford each contributed one RBI.

Philadelphia’s offensive statistics were:

34 at bats
4 runs
7 hits
4 RBI
0 home runs
3 walks
10 strikeouts
1 stolen base
7 runners left on base
4-for-14 with runners in scoring position

Stott recorded Philadelphia’s stolen base.

The Phillies’ 4-for-14 performance with runners in scoring position is an interesting part of the game because it was statistically better than the Mets’ 2-for-7 mark in that category.

However, Philadelphia had fewer overall hits and did not hit a home run. The Mets therefore produced more total offense despite the Phillies converting a greater percentage of their listed opportunities with runners in scoring position.

A. Bohm’s two-RBI contribution

Bohm was Philadelphia’s leading RBI producer in the supplied data.

He drove in two runs and recorded a double. His offensive contributions came during different scoring sequences, helping Philadelphia remain within reach of New York.

The scoring summary credits Bohm with an RBI single in the first inning and an RBI double in the third.

That gave Philadelphia an immediate response to New York’s early offense.

Although the Phillies eventually lost 6-4, Bohm’s production was one of the reasons the game remained competitive.

E. Sosa and the Phillies’ extra-base hits

Sosa recorded Philadelphia’s triple.

Philadelphia’s offense produced a double from Bohm and a triple from Sosa, meaning the Phillies did create significant extra-base opportunities even without hitting a home run.

That is worth noting because the box score does not indicate that Philadelphia lacked all forms of power. Instead, the difference was that the Mets converted extra-base production into six runs while Philadelphia finished with four.

The Phillies had seven total hits compared with 11 for New York, creating a four-hit difference.

Mets pitching: S. Manaea’s start

Manaea started for New York and worked 5.1 innings.

His supplied pitching line was:

5.1 innings
6 hits allowed
3 runs allowed
2 earned runs
1 walk
5 strikeouts
0 home runs allowed

The distinction between total runs and earned runs is particularly important.

Manaea allowed three runs, but only two were earned. That indicates that at least one of the runs charged to the Mets’ pitching line was not classified as earned under the scoring rules reflected in the box score.

Manaea also avoided allowing a home run despite Philadelphia producing several extra-base hits.

His five strikeouts and one walk produced a 5-to-1 strikeout-to-walk ratio in the supplied line.

A. Nola’s outing for Philadelphia

Nola started for Philadelphia and pitched five innings.

His line was:

5.0 innings
7 hits allowed
3 runs allowed
2 earned runs
1 walk
6 strikeouts
2 home runs allowed

Nola struck out six batters and walked only one.

The major difference in his line was the two home runs allowed. Both of those home runs were hit by J. Soto.

Nola’s six strikeouts show that he was able to miss bats, but New York still generated seven hits against him over five innings and produced three runs.

The two home runs were particularly costly because they accounted for a large portion of the Mets’ scoring against the Philadelphia starter.

Comparing the starting pitchers

The starting pitching lines were relatively similar in several categories.

Statistic	S. Manaea	A. Nola
Innings	5.1	5.0
Hits Allowed	6	7
Runs Allowed	3	3
Earned Runs	2	2
Walks	1	1
Strikeouts	5	6
Home Runs Allowed	0	2

Both starters allowed three total runs and two earned runs.

Nola recorded one more strikeout, while Manaea worked one-third of an inning longer. Each pitcher issued one walk.

The clearest difference was the home-run column. Manaea allowed none, while Nola allowed two.

That difference is significant because the two Mets home runs became central to the final scoring margin.

Mets bullpen and the final innings

After Manaea left the game, the Mets’ pitching staff completed the final innings without allowing Philadelphia to take the lead.

Brazoban received the win and was credited with a 4-1 record.

His line was:

1.0 inning
0 hits
0 earned runs
1 strikeout
1 walk

Williams recorded the save, his 11th according to the supplied data.

Williams’ line was:

1.0 inning
1 hit
0 earned runs
1 strikeout
1 walk

The Mets’ complete pitching line was:

9.0 innings
7 hits allowed
4 runs allowed
2 earned runs
3 walks
10 strikeouts
0 home runs allowed

The zero home runs allowed by the full Mets pitching staff is a notable contrast with Philadelphia’s two home runs allowed.

Phillies pitching statistics

Philadelphia’s complete pitching line was:

9.0 innings
11 hits allowed
6 runs allowed
5 earned runs
3 walks
9 strikeouts
2 home runs allowed

The Phillies pitching staff struck out nine Mets hitters, one fewer than the Mets pitching staff struck out Phillies hitters.

Both teams issued three walks.

The largest statistical differences were hits, runs, earned runs, and home runs allowed.

Philadelphia allowed 11 hits and six runs. New York allowed seven hits and four runs.

What the team totals reveal

Looking beyond individual players provides a clearer explanation of the final score.

New York held a 11-7 advantage in hits.

That four-hit advantage was the largest basic offensive difference between the teams.

The Mets also had a 2-0 advantage in home runs.

Philadelphia’s 4-for-14 mark with runners in scoring position was better than New York’s 2-for-7 mark, but the Mets created more total offensive production through additional hits and home-run power.

This is a useful reminder that one statistic rarely explains an entire baseball game.

A team can perform well in one category and still lose because the overall combination of offensive and pitching results favors the opponent.

Defensive mistakes mattered too

The Mets committed three errors, while the Phillies committed one.

On a basic box-score level, this means Philadelphia had the cleaner defensive game.

Yet the Mets still won.

The supplied scoring summary includes a fourth-inning RBI single by D. Hill with an error, showing that a defensive mistake was directly connected to a Philadelphia scoring sequence.

That makes the final score more nuanced than simply saying New York dominated.

The Mets won despite committing two more errors than Philadelphia.

Their advantage came from the offensive production and pitching results being strong enough to overcome those mistakes.

RISP statistics need context

Runners in scoring position statistics are often among the first numbers people look for after a game.

Here, the numbers were:

Mets: 2-for-7
Phillies: 4-for-14

Philadelphia had four hits in 14 opportunities with runners in scoring position, while New York had two hits in seven.

At first glance, Philadelphia’s percentage was higher.

However, the sample sizes are relatively small, and RISP performance alone does not describe the entire offensive process.

New York produced 11 hits overall, including two home runs, while Philadelphia produced seven hits without a home run.

The Mets also scored six runs compared with four for Philadelphia.

For this game, the broader offensive totals provide important context for the RISP numbers.

Why the seventh inning stands out

The seventh inning deserves special attention because it appears prominently in the scoring sequence.

New York added an RBI single from Wagaman and a two-run triple from Semien.

That sequence produced multiple runs at an important stage of the game.

Late scoring can be especially meaningful in a close contest because it changes the amount of pressure placed on the opposing offense in the remaining innings.

The Mets entered the final portion of the game with enough of an advantage for their pitching staff to protect the lead.

Philadelphia did score in the ninth inning through an RBI single by J. Crawford, but the Phillies did not complete the comeback.

The final scoring sequence

The supplied scoring summary provides a concise picture of how the game developed.

First inning

Soto hit a home run for New York.

A.J. Ewing then delivered an RBI double.

Philadelphia answered with an RBI single from A. Bohm.

Third inning

Soto hit his second home run of the game.

Philadelphia responded with an RBI double from Bohm.

Fourth inning

Hill produced an RBI single, with an error involved in the scoring sequence.

Seventh inning

Wagaman delivered an RBI single.

Semien then hit a two-run triple.

Ninth inning

Crawford recorded an RBI single for Philadelphia.

Despite the late Phillies run, the Mets maintained their advantage and completed the 6-4 victory.

Mets vs Phillies match player stats and the series result

The individual game result should be separated from the overall series result.

The Mets won this game 6-4, but the supplied data states that the Phillies won the three-game series 2-1.

That distinction is important for readers searching for a specific game’s player statistics.

A team can lose one game while winning the series. Likewise, the team that wins a particular matchup is not necessarily the series winner.

For this June 19 game, New York’s victory came through stronger overall offensive production and effective run prevention, while Philadelphia still secured the series.

Key player statistics table

Player	Team	Key contribution
J. Soto	Mets	2 home runs, 2 RBI
M. Semien	Mets	2 RBI, triple
A.J. Ewing	Mets	RBI double
C. Benge	Mets	Stolen base
S. Manaea	Mets	5.1 IP, 6 H, 3 R, 2 ER, 5 K
H. Brazoban	Mets	1.0 IP, 0 H, 0 ER, 1 K
D. Williams	Mets	Save, 1.0 IP, 1 H, 0 ER, 1 K
A. Bohm	Phillies	2 RBI, double
E. Sosa	Phillies	Triple
D. Hill	Phillies	RBI
J. Crawford	Phillies	RBI
B. Stott	Phillies	Stolen base
A. Nola	Phillies	5.0 IP, 7 H, 3 R, 2 ER, 6 K

This table is useful for readers who want the major individual contributions without having to scan the complete box score.

Important lessons from the box score

Several broader observations emerge from the supplied statistics.

Power can change a close game

The Mets hit two home runs, both by Soto.

Philadelphia hit none.

The final difference was two runs.

That does not mean the home runs alone determined the result, but they were a major component of New York’s six-run total.

Total hits created a significant gap

The Mets recorded 11 hits compared with seven for Philadelphia.

A four-hit advantage is substantial in a game decided by two runs.

Pitching limited the damage

The Mets allowed four runs but only two earned runs across nine innings.

Their pitchers also allowed zero home runs.

Philadelphia’s pitching staff allowed six runs, including five earned, and surrendered two home runs.

Philadelphia had opportunities

The Phillies went 4-for-14 with runners in scoring position.

That shows they were able to generate productive situations.

The Mets’ advantage came from the combination of total hits, home-run power, and keeping Philadelphia’s overall run total below their own.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the final score of the Mets vs Phillies game on June 19, 2026?

The New York Mets defeated the Philadelphia Phillies 6-4 at Citizens Bank Park in Philadelphia.

Who hit the most home runs in the game?

Soto hit two home runs for the Mets. Philadelphia did not hit a home run.

Who were the leading RBI players?

Soto and M. Semien each had two RBI for New York, while A. Bohm had two RBI for Philadelphia.

Who were the starting pitchers?

Manaea started for the Mets, while A. Nola started for the Phillies. Manaea pitched 5.1 innings, while Nola worked five innings.

Who earned the win and save?

Brazoban was credited with the win for the Mets, improving to 4-1 according to the supplied data. D. Williams recorded his 11th save.

Did the Mets win the series?

No. Although the Mets won this game 6-4, the supplied data states that the Phillies won the three-game series 2-1.

Conclusion

The mets vs phillies match player stats from June 19, 2026, show a game decided by a combination of timely power, extra-base hitting, pitching, and late offensive execution.

New York finished with 11 hits and six runs, compared with seven hits and four runs for Philadelphia. J. Soto’s two home runs were among the most significant individual contributions, while M. Semien added two RBI and a two-run triple. A.J. Ewing also contributed an RBI double.

Philadelphia received important production from A. Bohm, who drove in two runs and recorded a double. E. Sosa added a triple, while D. Hill and J. Crawford each contributed an RBI.

The starting pitchers produced similar earned-run totals, with both Manaea and Nola allowing two earned runs. Nola struck out six, while Manaea struck out five and worked slightly longer. The biggest difference between the starting pitching lines was Nola allowing two home runs while Manaea allowed none.

The Mets bullpen then protected the advantage. H. Brazoban earned the victory, and D. Williams closed the game for his 11th save.

The defensive numbers add another layer. New York committed three errors compared with Philadelphia’s one, yet still won because its offensive output and overall pitching results were sufficient to overcome those mistakes.

Ultimately, the 6-4 result represents one game within a series that Philadelphia won 2-1. For readers examining the player statistics, the most useful approach is to consider the complete box score rather than focusing on one isolated number. Hits, home runs, RBI, pitching lines, errors, runners in scoring position, and late-inning scoring all contributed to the final outcome.