Los Angeles Rams vs Arizona Cardinals Match Player Stats
The los angeles rams vs arizona cardinals match player stats from January 5, 2026, tell a clear story about how the Los Angeles Rams turned an efficient passing performance, a balanced rushing attack, and consistent defensive pressure into a 37-20 victory over the Arizona Cardinals. Matthew Stafford led the Rams with four touchdown passes and no interceptions, while Arizona received strong receiving production from Michael Wilson and Trey McBride but struggled to protect Jacoby Brissett against a Rams defense that recorded six sacks.
This matchup is useful to study because the final score alone does not explain how the game developed. Arizona produced 271 receiving yards, including 99 yards and a touchdown from Wilson, while the Rams finished with 259 receiving yards and four touchdown receptions. Los Angeles also ran for 143 yards compared with Arizona’s 79, giving the Rams another reliable way to control possessions.
The numbers also reveal an interesting contrast between the two teams. Arizona’s passing attack generated respectable yardage, but six sacks and a lost fumble created costly negative plays. Los Angeles, meanwhile, kept its passing game clean. Stafford completed 25 of 40 attempts for 259 yards, four touchdowns, and zero interceptions.
For readers searching for a complete statistical breakdown, this article examines the passing, rushing, receiving, defensive, kicking, return, and punting numbers from the game. It also explains which statistics mattered most and how individual performances fit into the larger team result.
Los Angeles Rams vs Arizona Cardinals Match Player Stats
The Los Angeles Rams defeated the Arizona Cardinals 37-20 on January 5, 2026. Los Angeles entered the game with a 12-5 record and a 7-1 home record, while Arizona finished with a 3-14 record and was 2-7 on the road.
The score shows a 17-point difference, but the statistical picture is more detailed.
Game Overview
| Category | Arizona Cardinals | Los Angeles Rams |
| Final Score | 20 | 37 |
| Record | 3-14 | 12-5 |
| Away/Home Record | 2-7 Away | 7-1 Home |
| Team Rushing | 79 yards | 143 yards |
| Team Receiving | 271 yards | 259 yards |
| Passing TDs | 2 | 4 |
| Sacks Allowed | 6 | 1 |
| Defensive Sacks | 1 | 6 |
| Interceptions | 0 | 1 |
| Fumbles Lost | 1 | 0 |
One of the most important observations is the difference in defensive pressure. Arizona recorded one sack, while Los Angeles recorded six. That five-sack gap had a direct effect on the way the quarterbacks operated.
The Rams also had a substantial advantage on the ground. Their 143 rushing yards came on 31 attempts, compared with 79 yards on 15 attempts for Arizona.
That means Los Angeles did not need to depend entirely on Stafford’s arm. The Rams had enough rushing production from Kyren Williams and Blake Corum to keep their offense balanced.
Passing Stats: Matthew Stafford Controls the Game
Matthew Stafford was the central figure in the Rams’ offensive performance.
He completed 25 of 40 passes for 259 yards. More importantly, he threw four touchdowns without an interception. His passer rating was listed at 114.5, and he was sacked only once.
That combination is important because touchdown production and turnover avoidance can dramatically change the efficiency of an offense.
Matthew Stafford
- Completions: 25
- Attempts: 40
- Completion percentage: 62.5%
- Passing yards: 259
- Passing touchdowns: 4
- Interceptions: 0
- Sacks: 1
- Passer rating: 114.5
Stafford’s 259 yards were not an unusually high total by themselves. The more significant part of his performance was how efficiently he converted his opportunities into touchdowns.
He averaged 6.5 yards per passing attempt based on the listed 259 yards over 40 attempts. He also avoided an interception despite throwing 40 passes.
That gave Los Angeles a strong combination of volume and scoring efficiency.
The four touchdown passes were distributed across three primary receiving targets in the supplied statistics. Tyler Higbee caught one touchdown, Puka Nacua caught one, and Colby Parkinson caught two.
This distribution made the Rams’ passing game difficult to reduce to one receiver.
Jacoby Brissett
Arizona’s primary quarterback, Jacoby Brissett, completed 22 of 31 passes for 243 yards, two touchdowns, and one interception.
His listed passer rating was 101.9.
- Completions: 22
- Attempts: 31
- Completion percentage: 71.0%
- Passing yards: 243
- Passing touchdowns: 2
- Interceptions: 1
- Sacks: 6
- Passer rating: 101.9
Brissett’s completion percentage was higher than Stafford’s, and his 243 passing yards were only 16 fewer than Stafford’s total.
However, the six sacks stand out.
A quarterback can produce solid passing numbers while still facing major offensive problems if the offense repeatedly loses yards through sacks. In this game, Arizona’s passing production was therefore more complicated than the basic completion and yardage totals suggest.
Brissett also lost a fumble, adding another turnover to Arizona’s offensive problems.
Matt Haack’s Passing Appearance
Arizona also recorded a passing line for Matt Haack.
He completed his only pass attempt for 28 yards, with no touchdown and no interception. His listed passer rating was 118.8.
The one-attempt sample is far too small to compare meaningfully with the two starting quarterbacks, but the 28-yard completion contributed to Arizona’s overall offensive production.
Rushing Stats: The Rams Establish a Major Advantage
The rushing statistics provide one of the clearest differences between the teams.
Arizona finished with 15 rushing attempts for 79 yards, an average of 5.3 yards per carry.
Los Angeles recorded 31 rushing attempts for 143 yards, averaging 4.6 yards per carry.
The Rams therefore ran the ball twice as many times as Arizona while gaining 64 more rushing yards.
Arizona Cardinals Rushing
Arizona’s leading rusher in the supplied statistics was Emari Demercado.
He had only two carries but gained 29 yards, producing a remarkable 14.5 yards per carry.
His numbers show why rushing averages must always be viewed alongside workload. A player with two carries can have a much higher average than a player with 10 or 15 attempts, but the smaller sample provides less information about sustained production.
Arizona’s rushing leaders were:
- Emari Demercado: 2 carries, 29 yards, 14.5 average
- Jacoby Brissett: 3 carries, 19 yards, 6.3 average
- Michael Carter: 7 carries, 18 yards, 2.6 average
- Corey Kiner: 3 carries, 13 yards, 4.3 average
The Cardinals’ rushing production was spread among four players, but no player received a large rushing workload.
Michael Carter had the most attempts with seven, but his 18 yards produced only 2.6 yards per carry.
Los Angeles Rams Rushing
The Rams had a more concentrated and productive rushing attack.
Kyren Williams led Los Angeles with 12 carries for 60 yards, averaging 5.0 yards per carry.
Blake Corum was almost equally productive. He carried the ball 13 times for 59 yards, averaging 4.5 yards per carry.
Puka Nacua also contributed two rushing attempts for 24 yards, averaging 12.0 yards per carry.
The Rams’ rushing leaders were:
- Kyren Williams: 12 carries, 60 yards, 5.0 average
- Blake Corum: 13 carries, 59 yards, 4.5 average
- Puka Nacua: 2 carries, 24 yards, 12.0 average
Williams and Corum combined for 119 rushing yards on 25 attempts.
That is significant because it means the Rams had two running backs producing almost identical yardage totals while sharing the workload.
Instead of relying on one player to carry the rushing attack, Los Angeles generated production through both backs.
Receiving Stats: Michael Wilson Leads Arizona
Arizona actually finished with more team receiving yards than Los Angeles according to the supplied statistics.
The Cardinals recorded 23 receptions for 271 yards and two touchdowns.
The Rams recorded 25 receptions for 259 yards and four touchdowns.
That is an important detail when looking beyond the final score.
Arizona had 12 more receiving yards despite scoring two fewer passing touchdowns.
Michael Wilson
Michael Wilson was Arizona’s leading receiver by yardage.
He caught five passes for 99 yards and one touchdown. His longest reception covered 43 yards.
His average came to 19.8 yards per reception.
That is a substantial figure, especially considering that he produced those 99 yards on only five receptions.
Wilson’s performance demonstrates why a team’s receiving total can remain strong even when its offense struggles in other areas. A handful of explosive plays can account for a large percentage of a team’s passing production.
Trey McBride
Trey McBride caught seven passes for 65 yards.
He did not record a touchdown in the supplied statistics, but his seven receptions were the highest reception total among Arizona’s listed receivers.
His longest reception was 29 yards.
McBride’s role was therefore more volume-oriented than Wilson’s. Wilson generated more yardage per reception, while McBride recorded more catches.
Emari Demercado
Demercado added one reception for 28 yards.
That single catch produced 28 receiving yards, matching the yardage from his one pass reception and making him another source of explosive production.
Arizona Team Receiving
Arizona’s complete listed receiving line was:
- 23 receptions
- 271 yards
- 2 touchdowns
The receiving production was good enough to keep Arizona within reach offensively, but the six sacks and turnover issues prevented that yardage from translating into the same scoring output as Los Angeles.
Rams Receiving Stats
The Rams recorded 25 receptions for 259 yards and four touchdowns.
The most notable part of the Rams receiving numbers was touchdown distribution.
Tyler Higbee
Tyler Higbee caught five passes for 91 yards and one touchdown.
His longest reception was 22 yards.
Higbee therefore accounted for more than one-third of the Rams’ receiving yardage while also finding the end zone.
His 91 yards were only eight fewer than Wilson’s 99, despite Higbee having the same number of receptions.
Puka Nacua
Puka Nacua led the Rams with 10 receptions.
He finished with 76 receiving yards and one touchdown, with a long reception of 17 yards.
Nacua’s contribution was particularly notable because he also had two rushing attempts for 24 yards.
Combining his listed rushing and receiving yardage gives him 100 yards from scrimmage based on the supplied figures.
That makes him one of the more versatile contributors in the game.
Colby Parkinson
Colby Parkinson caught four passes for 36 yards and two touchdowns.
His longest reception was 21 yards.
The two touchdown receptions were important because Parkinson produced 50 percent of the Rams’ listed receiving touchdowns despite recording fewer catches than Nacua or Higbee.
Los Angeles Team Receiving
The Rams finished with:
- 25 receptions
- 259 yards
- 4 touchdowns
The most striking feature was scoring efficiency. Los Angeles converted its receiving production into four touchdowns, twice Arizona’s total.
Defensive Stats Tell Another Part of the Story
Offensive statistics receive most of the attention, but the defensive numbers help explain the 37-20 result.
Arizona recorded 75 total tackles, including 39 solo tackles. The Cardinals also recorded one sack, four tackles for loss, four passes defended, and four quarterback hits.
Los Angeles recorded 52 tackles, including 40 solo tackles. The Rams produced six sacks, seven tackles for loss, three passes defended, and 12 quarterback hits.
The quarterback-hit difference is particularly notable.
Arizona had four quarterback hits.
Los Angeles had 12.
That means the Rams did not simply record six sacks. They were consistently able to pressure the quarterback.
Rams Pass Rush
Los Angeles’ six sacks were the highest-impact defensive statistic in the supplied numbers.
The Rams also recorded seven tackles for loss and 12 quarterback hits.
This combination suggests that Arizona’s offensive line and passing structure faced sustained pressure throughout the contest.
A sack is more than a negative rushing play. It can also interrupt a drive, push an offense out of field-goal range, create difficult down-and-distance situations, and increase the likelihood of future passing situations.
In this game, the six-sack difference helped distinguish the teams despite Arizona producing 271 receiving yards.
Interceptions
Los Angeles recorded one interception through Ahkello Witherspoon.
His listed interception statistics were:
- Interceptions: 1
- Return yards: 0
- Interception touchdowns: 0
Arizona recorded no interceptions.
This gave Los Angeles another advantage in the turnover battle.
Fumbles
Arizona’s Jacoby Brissett was credited with one fumble and one lost fumble.
Los Angeles had one listed fumble recovery associated with Kobie Turner, who recorded zero fumbles and zero lost fumbles in the supplied statistics.
Turnovers are particularly important in a game where the teams produced relatively close passing yardage totals.
Arizona had 271 receiving yards, but losing possession through a fumble and interception-related defensive pressure reduced the value of that production.
Special Teams Player Stats
Special teams can easily disappear from a basic box-score discussion, but the numbers from this game show several useful contributions.
Arizona Kicking
Chad Ryland was perfect on his listed kicks.
He made:
- 2 of 2 field goals
- Long field goal: 56 yards
- 2 of 2 extra points
- 8 total points
The 56-yard field goal was Arizona’s longest successful kick in the supplied statistics.
Rams Kicking
Harrison Mevis also had a perfect kicking day.
He made:
- 3 of 3 field goals
- Long field goal: 42 yards
- 4 of 4 extra points
- 13 total points
His 13 points represented a substantial contribution to the Rams’ 37-point total.
Kick Returns
Arizona’s Steven Sims handled the listed kick-return production.
He recorded three kick returns for 49 yards, averaging 16.3 yards per return.
Los Angeles’ Ronnie Rivers and Xavier Smith combined for five kick returns and 134 yards, averaging 26.8 yards per return.
That gave the Rams a clear advantage in kick-return yardage.
Punt Returns
Steven Sims also recorded two punt returns for Arizona, gaining 27 yards at an average of 13.5 yards per return.
Xavier Smith recorded one punt return for Los Angeles for nine yards.
The return numbers show that Arizona had an individual contributor in Sims, while Los Angeles gained more overall kick-return yardage through its return combination.
Punting Stats
Arizona’s Matt Haack punted twice for 109 yards.
His average was 54.5 yards per punt, with a long of 57 yards.
Los Angeles punter Ethan Evans also had two punts.
He recorded 117 total yards, averaged 58.5 yards per punt, and had a long of 64 yards.
The difference was modest in sample size because both players punted only twice, but Evans had the higher average and longer punt.
Punting Comparison
| Statistic | Matt Haack | Ethan Evans |
| Punts | 2 | 2 |
| Total yards | 109 | 117 |
| Average | 54.5 | 58.5 |
| Long | 57 | 64 |
These numbers should not be interpreted as a complete measure of punting quality because field position, return opportunities, and situational decisions also matter. Still, the listed figures show that Evans generated more yardage per punt in this game.
What the Numbers Say About the Game
The most useful way to understand this matchup is to look at the relationships between the statistics rather than treating each number separately.
1. Passing Yardage Was Not the Main Difference
Arizona had 271 receiving yards compared with 259 for Los Angeles.
That means the Rams won despite having 12 fewer receiving yards.
This is one of the clearest examples of why total passing or receiving yardage does not automatically determine the winner.
Los Angeles scored four passing touchdowns.
Arizona scored two.
The Rams also avoided an interception from Stafford, while Arizona lost a fumble and surrendered six sacks.
2. The Rams Had a Stronger Rushing Foundation
Los Angeles rushed for 143 yards.
Arizona rushed for 79.
The 64-yard difference gave the Rams another method of moving the football.
Williams and Corum were especially important because they combined for 119 yards.
Their production helped reduce the pressure on Stafford to win every offensive series through the air.
3. Defensive Pressure Was a Major Separator
The Rams recorded six sacks and 12 quarterback hits.
Arizona recorded one sack and four quarterback hits.
That is a difference of five sacks and eight quarterback hits.
For a passing offense, repeated pressure can disrupt timing even when the quarterback still completes a high percentage of his throws.
Brissett completed 71 percent of his listed attempts, but the six sacks show that completion percentage alone does not capture the entire passing experience.
4. Touchdown Efficiency Favored Los Angeles
Arizona generated 271 receiving yards and two receiving touchdowns.
Los Angeles generated 259 receiving yards and four receiving touchdowns.
The Rams therefore produced fewer receiving yards but twice as many receiving touchdowns.
This is one of the most important statistical lessons from the game: yardage and scoring efficiency are separate measurements.
Key Player Performances
Several individual performances deserve special attention when reviewing the complete player statistics.
Matthew Stafford
Stafford’s 25 completions for 259 yards were supported by four touchdowns and zero interceptions.
His performance was defined more by scoring efficiency and ball security than by raw yardage volume.
Michael Wilson
Wilson was Arizona’s leading receiver by yardage, with 99 yards and a touchdown on five catches.
His 43-yard longest reception highlights his ability to generate significant gains on limited volume.
Trey McBride
McBride recorded seven receptions for 65 yards.
His seven catches made him an important part of Arizona’s possession passing game.
Kyren Williams
Williams carried 12 times for 60 yards.
His 5.0-yard rushing average gave Los Angeles a dependable source of ground production.
Blake Corum
Corum nearly matched Williams’ rushing output with 59 yards on 13 carries.
The fact that both running backs exceeded 50 yards made the Rams’ rushing attack more balanced.
Puka Nacua
Nacua recorded 10 receptions for 76 yards and one receiving touchdown, plus 24 rushing yards on two carries.
His combined role made him one of the most versatile offensive contributors in the supplied statistics.
Colby Parkinson
Parkinson caught four passes for 36 yards and two touchdowns.
His two touchdown receptions were a major part of Los Angeles’ scoring efficiency.
Ahkello Witherspoon
Witherspoon’s interception was the Rams’ only listed interception.
The play added to Los Angeles’ advantage in creating defensive takeaways.
How to Read These Player Stats Correctly
A common mistake when analyzing an NFL box score is to identify the player with the largest yardage total and assume that player had the most important performance.
The better approach is to consider several categories together.
For quarterbacks, examine:
- Completion percentage
- Passing yards
- Touchdowns
- Interceptions
- Sacks
- Passer rating
For running backs, look at:
- Carries
- Rushing yards
- Yards per carry
- Workload distribution
- Explosive runs
For receivers, consider:
- Receptions
- Receiving yards
- Touchdowns
- Yards per reception
- Longest reception
For defenses, focus on:
- Sacks
- Quarterback hits
- Tackles for loss
- Interceptions
- Fumbles and recoveries
- Passes defended
Using those categories together gives a more complete picture than focusing on one statistic.
Important Statistical Context
There are also limitations to consider when interpreting individual numbers.
A two-carry performance such as Demercado’s 29 rushing yards produces an impressive 14.5-yard average, but it does not necessarily indicate the same sustained impact as 60 yards on 12 carries or 59 yards on 13 carries.
Likewise, a receiver can lead a team in yardage without leading it in receptions or touchdowns.
Wilson’s 99 receiving yards came on five catches.
McBride had seven catches but 65 yards.
Those are different types of production.
The same principle applies to quarterbacks. Brissett’s 71.0 percent completion rate was higher than Stafford’s 62.5 percent, yet Stafford threw four touchdowns without an interception while Brissett threw two touchdowns, one interception, and absorbed six sacks.
The context around every number matters.
A Compact Player Stat Reference
Arizona Cardinals
Passing
- Jacoby Brissett: 22/31, 243 yards, 2 TD, 1 INT, 6 sacks, 101.9 rating
- Matt Haack: 1/1, 28 yards, 0 TD, 0 INT, 118.8 rating
Rushing
- Emari Demercado: 2 carries, 29 yards
- Jacoby Brissett: 3 carries, 19 yards
- Michael Carter: 7 carries, 18 yards
- Corey Kiner: 3 carries, 13 yards
- Team: 15 carries, 79 yards
Receiving
- Michael Wilson: 5 receptions, 99 yards, 1 TD
- Trey McBride: 7 receptions, 65 yards
- Emari Demercado: 1 reception, 28 yards
- Team: 23 receptions, 271 yards, 2 TD
Defense
- 75 tackles
- 39 solo tackles
- 1 sack
- 4 tackles for loss
- 4 passes defended
- 4 quarterback hits
- 0 interceptions
Special Teams
- Chad Ryland: 2/2 field goals, 2/2 extra points, 8 points
- Steven Sims: 3 kick returns for 49 yards
- Steven Sims: 2 punt returns for 27 yards
- Matt Haack: 2 punts for 109 yards
Los Angeles Rams
Passing
- Matthew Stafford: 25/40, 259 yards, 4 TD, 0 INT, 1 sack, 114.5 rating
Rushing
- Kyren Williams: 12 carries, 60 yards
- Blake Corum: 13 carries, 59 yards
- Puka Nacua: 2 carries, 24 yards
- Team: 31 carries, 143 yards
Receiving
- Tyler Higbee: 5 receptions, 91 yards, 1 TD
- Puka Nacua: 10 receptions, 76 yards, 1 TD
- Colby Parkinson: 4 receptions, 36 yards, 2 TD
- Team: 25 receptions, 259 yards, 4 TD
Defense
- 52 tackles
- 40 solo tackles
- 6 sacks
- 7 tackles for loss
- 3 passes defended
- 12 quarterback hits
- Ahkello Witherspoon: 1 interception
Special Teams
- Harrison Mevis: 3/3 field goals, 4/4 extra points, 13 points
- Ronnie Rivers and Xavier Smith: 5 kick returns for 134 yards
- Xavier Smith: 1 punt return for 9 yards
- Ethan Evans: 2 punts for 117 yards
FAQs
Who won the Rams vs Cardinals game on January 5, 2026?
The Los Angeles Rams defeated the Arizona Cardinals 37-20.
How many touchdowns did Matthew Stafford throw?
Matthew Stafford threw four touchdown passes and had zero interceptions. He completed 25 of 40 attempts for 259 yards.
Who was Arizona’s leading receiver?
Michael Wilson led Arizona with 99 receiving yards and one touchdown on five receptions. His longest reception was 43 yards.
How many sacks did the Rams record?
The Los Angeles Rams recorded six sacks against Arizona. The team also recorded 12 quarterback hits and seven tackles for loss.
How many rushing yards did the Rams have?
Los Angeles recorded 143 rushing yards on 31 attempts. Kyren Williams had 60 yards and Blake Corum had 59 yards.
Did Arizona have more receiving yards than Los Angeles?
Yes. Arizona recorded 271 receiving yards, while Los Angeles recorded 259. However, the Rams had four receiving touchdowns compared with Arizona’s two.
Conclusion
The los angeles rams vs arizona cardinals match player stats provide a detailed explanation of the 37-20 Rams victory on January 5, 2026.
Matthew Stafford delivered four touchdown passes without an interception, giving Los Angeles efficient scoring production through the air. The Rams also received strong rushing performances from Kyren Williams and Blake Corum, who combined for 119 yards.
Arizona’s passing attack produced 271 receiving yards, with Michael Wilson reaching 99 yards and Trey McBride catching seven passes for 65 yards. Those numbers show that the Cardinals were capable of moving the ball through the air.
The biggest statistical differences appeared in defensive pressure, rushing production, and scoring efficiency. Los Angeles recorded six sacks compared with Arizona’s one, produced 12 quarterback hits compared with four, and gained 143 rushing yards compared with Arizona’s 79.
The game is therefore a useful example of why a complete box-score analysis needs more than passing yards or total offensive yardage. The Rams had fewer receiving yards but produced twice as many receiving touchdowns. They also created more defensive pressure, protected Stafford more effectively, and generated significantly more rushing volume.
Taken together, the player and team statistics provide a much clearer picture of how Los Angeles reached 37 points and why Arizona finished with 20 despite several productive individual performances.
