Baltimore Ravens vs Kansas City Chiefs Match Player Stats
The Baltimore Ravens vs Kansas City Chiefs match player stats from September 29, 2025, tell a detailed story about how Kansas City turned a close opening quarter into a 37-20 victory. The Chiefs finished with 264 passing yards, four passing touchdowns, and no interceptions. Baltimore produced 166 rushing yards and 199 receiving yards, but turnovers and Kansas City’s passing efficiency changed the game.
This matchup is especially useful for readers who want more than the final score. The individual numbers show where each team created opportunities, which players generated explosive plays, and how the statistical balance shifted during the game.
Kansas City entered the contest with a 1-2 record before improving to 2-2. Baltimore dropped to 1-3 after the loss. The Ravens were also 0-2 on the road at that point, while Kansas City moved to 1-1 at home.
Baltimore Ravens vs Kansas City Chiefs Match Player Stats
The final score was Kansas City Chiefs 37, Baltimore Ravens 20.
The quarter-by-quarter scoring explains how the game developed:
| Quarter | Baltimore Ravens | Kansas City Chiefs |
| 1st | 7 | 3 |
| 2nd | 3 | 17 |
| 3rd | 3 | 10 |
| 4th | 7 | 7 |
| Final | 20 | 37 |
Baltimore opened with a seven-point first quarter while Kansas City managed only three points.
The second quarter produced the biggest swing. Kansas City scored 17 points, while Baltimore added only three.
The Chiefs continued that momentum after halftime by scoring another 10 points in the third quarter. Both teams scored seven points in the final period.
That scoring pattern is important because the final margin was not created by one isolated play. Kansas City built its advantage through sustained offensive production after the opening quarter.
Game Overview and Statistical Context
The Chiefs finished with stronger passing production and significantly more passing touchdowns.
Kansas City completed 25 of 37 passes for 264 team passing yards, averaging 7.3 yards per attempt. The team recorded four passing touchdowns and no interceptions.
Baltimore completed 23 of 33 passes for 194 yards. The Ravens averaged 6.0 yards per attempt and recorded one passing touchdown and one interception.
The rushing numbers moved in the opposite direction.
Baltimore ran for 166 yards on 17 attempts, producing an outstanding 9.8 yards per carry. Kansas City rushed 32 times for 118 yards, averaging 3.7 yards per carry.
This created an interesting statistical contrast. Baltimore generated more rushing yards and a better rushing average, while Kansas City produced the more productive passing performance.
The receiving totals also favored Kansas City in efficiency and scoring output.
Baltimore recorded 23 receptions for 199 yards and one touchdown. Kansas City produced 25 receptions for 270 yards and four touchdowns.
Lamar Jackson Passing Performance
Lamar Jackson completed 14 of 20 passes for 147 yards, averaging 7.4 yards per attempt.
He threw one touchdown and one interception.
His listed passer rating was 86.9, while his QBR was 29.8.
Jackson also carried the ball six times for 48 yards, averaging 8.0 yards per attempt. His longest run was 17 yards.
The passing statistics show that Jackson was relatively efficient on a per-attempt basis. However, the total production remained below Patrick Mahomes’ output.
Jackson was also listed with three to five sacks in the game data. His lost fumble was another important negative play for Baltimore.
When examining his complete statistical line, it is useful to separate his passing and rushing contributions. His 48 rushing yards added another dimension to the Ravens offense, but Baltimore still struggled to match Kansas City’s touchdown production through the air.
Patrick Mahomes Passing Performance
Patrick Mahomes completed 25 of 37 passes for 270 yards, averaging 7.3 yards per attempt.
He threw four touchdown passes without an interception.
Mahomes recorded a 124.8 passer rating and a 73.8 QBR in the supplied game data.
His 270 passing yards were slightly higher than Kansas City’s listed team passing total of 264 yards. This difference reflects the distinction between individual passing statistics and team statistical presentation in the supplied source.
The most significant number is the touchdown total.
Mahomes produced four touchdown passes compared with Jackson’s one. That five-to-one difference in passing touchdowns was central to the offensive contrast between the teams.
Mahomes also contributed five rushing yards on four attempts.
Baltimore’s Rushing Production
Baltimore’s rushing attack was one of the most productive statistical areas of the game.
The Ravens finished with:
- 17 rushing attempts
- 166 rushing yards
- 9.8 yards per carry
- 1 rushing touchdown
- 71-yard longest run
Justice Hill led the group with an unusually explosive statistical line.
Justice Hill
Hill carried the ball only three times, but he gained 76 yards.
That produced an average of 25.3 yards per carry.
His longest run covered 71 yards, and he scored one rushing touchdown.
Hill also contributed as a receiver with five catches for 41 yards and one touchdown.
His overall contribution therefore extended beyond his limited rushing workload. He created explosive yardage on the ground and added receiving production.
Lamar Jackson
Jackson rushed six times for 48 yards, averaging 8.0 yards per attempt.
His longest run was 17 yards.
That rushing contribution helped Baltimore produce its impressive 166-yard team total despite relatively few attempts.
Derrick Henry
Derrick Henry carried eight times for 42 yards.
He averaged 5.3 yards per carry, with a longest run of 14 yards.
Henry also caught two passes for 16 yards.
His rushing volume was higher than Hill’s, but Hill produced substantially more rushing yardage because of the 71-yard explosive play.
Kansas City Rushing Production
Kansas City rushed 32 times for 118 yards, averaging 3.7 yards per carry.
Unlike Baltimore, the Chiefs did not produce a rushing touchdown.
The longest Kansas City rushing play covered 35 yards.
The main contributors included Xavier Worthy, Isiah Pacheco, Kareem Hunt, Brashard Smith, Patrick Mahomes, and Gardner Minshew II.
Xavier Worthy
Worthy was Kansas City’s leading rusher by average and explosive impact.
He carried twice for 38 yards, averaging 19.0 yards per carry.
His longest run was 35 yards.
Worthy also led the Chiefs in receiving yardage with 83 yards, making him one of the most significant all-purpose statistical contributors in the matchup.
Isiah Pacheco
Pacheco carried seven times for 35 yards.
He averaged 5.0 yards per attempt, with a longest run of 12 yards.
He also caught two passes for 13 yards and one touchdown.
Kareem Hunt
Hunt received the highest rushing workload among Kansas City’s listed running backs.
He carried 13 times for 34 yards, averaging 2.6 yards per attempt.
His longest run was seven yards.
Hunt also recorded one reception for 13 yards.
Baltimore Receiving Statistics
Baltimore’s receivers combined for 23 receptions and 199 yards, averaging 8.7 yards per reception.
The team recorded one receiving touchdown.
Zay Flowers
Zay Flowers led Baltimore in receiving.
He caught seven passes for 74 yards on eight targets.
His average was 10.6 yards per reception, and his longest catch went for 21 yards.
Flowers was therefore involved heavily in the passing game. His eight targets were tied for the highest individual target total on Baltimore’s side.
Mark Andrews
Mark Andrews finished with six receptions for 30 yards on eight targets.
He averaged 4.3 yards per reception.
His longest reception was seven yards.
The number of receptions shows consistent involvement, although the average gain per catch was modest.
Justice Hill
Hill’s receiving contribution was particularly notable.
He caught five passes for 41 yards and scored one receiving touchdown.
His longest reception covered 13 yards.
Combining his rushing and receiving numbers, Hill recorded 117 yards from scrimmage and two touchdowns based on the supplied player statistics.
Other Baltimore Receivers
Rashod Bateman caught one pass for 24 yards.
Tylan Wallace recorded one reception for 14 yards.
Derrick Henry caught two passes for 16 yards.
DeAndre Hopkins was targeted once but did not record a reception.
These figures show that Baltimore distributed the ball across several players, although Flowers remained the leading receiving option.
Kansas City Receiving Statistics
Kansas City recorded 25 receptions for 270 yards.
The Chiefs averaged 10.8 yards per reception and produced four receiving touchdowns.
Xavier Worthy
Worthy led the Chiefs with five receptions for 83 yards.
He averaged 16.6 yards per catch and produced a 37-yard long reception.
He was targeted eight times.
His combined rushing and receiving numbers demonstrate his explosive role in the offense. He gained 38 rushing yards and 83 receiving yards.
Travis Kelce
Travis Kelce caught five passes for 48 yards.
He averaged 9.6 yards per reception and recorded a 15-yard long.
Kelce received five targets.
His five receptions tied Worthy’s reception total, although Worthy generated considerably more receiving yardage.
Hollywood Brown
Hollywood Brown caught three passes for 38 yards.
He averaged 12.7 yards per reception and scored one touchdown.
His longest reception was 18 yards.
JuJu Smith-Schuster
JuJu Smith-Schuster recorded four receptions for 36 yards.
He averaged 9.0 yards per catch and scored one touchdown.
He was targeted six times.
Isiah Pacheco
Pacheco added two receptions for 13 yards and one touchdown.
His longest reception was eight yards.
Brashard Smith
Smith caught three passes for 27 yards.
He averaged 9.0 yards per reception, with a 17-yard long.
Tyquan Thornton
Thornton recorded one catch for 11 yards and scored one touchdown.
His lone reception also represented his longest play.
Passing Comparison
The passing comparison provides one of the clearest explanations for Kansas City’s victory.
| Passing Category | Ravens | Chiefs |
| Completions | 23 | 25 |
| Attempts | 33 | 37 |
| Passing Yards | 194 | 264 |
| Yards Per Attempt | 6.0 | 7.3 |
| Passing TDs | 1 | 4 |
| Interceptions | 1 | 0 |
| Sacks | 3-5 | 1-6 |
The completion totals were relatively close.
Kansas City attempted four more passes and completed two more.
The larger difference came from yardage and touchdowns.
The Chiefs generated 70 more passing yards and three more passing touchdowns.
Kansas City also avoided an interception, while Baltimore threw one and recorded a lost fumble through Lamar Jackson.
These details matter because raw passing yardage alone does not explain the result. The touchdown and turnover figures show how Kansas City converted its passing opportunities into points.
Rushing Comparison
The rushing comparison tells a different story.
| Rushing Category | Ravens | Chiefs |
| Attempts | 17 | 32 |
| Yards | 166 | 118 |
| Average | 9.8 | 3.7 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 0 |
| Long | 71 | 35 |
Baltimore gained 48 more rushing yards despite making 15 fewer rushing attempts.
The Ravens also averaged 6.1 yards more per carry than Kansas City.
That difference was driven partly by explosive runs. Justice Hill’s 71-yard run was the biggest rushing play in the game.
Kansas City’s rushing attack was more volume-oriented. The Chiefs ran 32 times but averaged only 3.7 yards per attempt.
The result therefore demonstrates why a team can dominate one statistical category and still lose the game.
Receiving Comparison
Kansas City’s passing attack also produced more receiving yardage.
| Receiving Category | Ravens | Chiefs |
| Receptions | 23 | 25 |
| Receiving Yards | 199 | 270 |
| Average | 8.7 | 10.8 |
| Touchdowns | 1 | 4 |
| Long | 24 | 37 |
| Targets | 30 | 35 |
The Chiefs had only two more receptions.
Yet they produced 71 more receiving yards.
The difference in average yards per reception was also substantial.
Kansas City averaged 10.8 yards per catch compared with Baltimore’s 8.7.
Most importantly, the Chiefs converted their receiving production into four touchdowns.
Defensive Player Statistics
Baltimore recorded 73 total tackles, including 41 solo tackles.
The Ravens also recorded one sack, two tackles for loss, two passes defended, and three quarterback hits.
Kyle Hamilton led Baltimore with eight total tackles, including three solo tackles.
Kansas City recorded 53 total tackles and 42 solo tackles.
The Chiefs produced three sacks, three tackles for loss, four passes defended, and eight quarterback hits.
Drue Tranquill led Kansas City with seven total tackles, including four solo tackles.
The defensive difference in quarterback pressure is worth noting.
Kansas City recorded eight quarterback hits compared with Baltimore’s three.
That pressure statistic provides useful context alongside the passing numbers. The Chiefs not only produced four passing touchdowns, but their defense also generated more disruption against Baltimore’s quarterbacks.
Turnovers and Defensive Plays
Turnovers were another important part of the statistical picture.
Baltimore recorded one fumble by Lamar Jackson, and it was lost.
The Ravens did not record an interception.
Kansas City recorded one interception by Leo Chenal.
Chenal finished with one interception, zero return yards, and zero interception touchdowns.
Drue Tranquill also recovered a fumble, with zero fumbles of his own recorded.
The turnover statistics therefore show Kansas City producing two listed takeaways while Baltimore had one lost fumble and no interceptions.
Even when turnover totals are small, individual possessions can have a major effect on scoring opportunities.
Special Teams Player Statistics
Special teams also contributed measurable value during the game.
Baltimore Kicking
Tyler Loop was perfect on his listed kicking opportunities.
He made:
- 2 of 2 field goals
- 2 of 2 extra points
- 8 total points
- 43-yard longest field goal
Kansas City Kicking
Harrison Butker converted:
- 3 of 4 field goals
- 4 of 4 extra points
- 13 total points
- 38-yard longest field goal
Butker therefore scored 13 points, five more than Loop.
Kick Returns
Justice Hill was highly productive on Baltimore’s kick returns.
He returned five kicks for 133 yards, averaging 26.6 yards per return.
His longest return was 30 yards.
Rasheen Ali added two returns for 31 yards.
Baltimore finished with 164 kick-return yards.
Kansas City recorded 132 kick-return yards.
Nikko Remigio had one 47-yard kick return, while Brashard Smith averaged 27.5 yards on two returns.
Why the Final Score Was 37-20
The statistical story becomes clearer when the major categories are considered together.
Baltimore had advantages in rushing production and rushing efficiency.
The Ravens gained 166 rushing yards compared with Kansas City’s 118.
However, Kansas City created a much larger advantage through the passing game.
The Chiefs produced 270 passing yards from Mahomes and four touchdown passes.
Baltimore produced 194 team passing yards and one passing touchdown.
Kansas City also had the advantage in defensive pressure, recording eight quarterback hits and three sacks compared with Baltimore’s three quarterback hits and one sack.
Turnovers added another layer.
Baltimore lost one fumble and threw one interception, while Kansas City avoided an interception in the supplied passing statistics.
The biggest difference was therefore not simply total yardage.
It was how effectively Kansas City converted its offensive opportunities into touchdowns while limiting turnovers.
Explosive Plays That Shaped the Statistics
Explosive plays can dramatically change a box score, and this game included several notable examples.
For Baltimore, Justice Hill’s 71-yard rushing play was the largest rushing gain listed for either team.
For Kansas City, Xavier Worthy recorded a 35-yard rushing play and a 37-yard reception.
These plays help explain why both players appear prominently in the statistical breakdown.
Hill finished with 76 rushing yards on only three attempts.
Worthy finished with 38 rushing yards and 83 receiving yards.
The difference is that Kansas City had several players contributing to a four-touchdown passing attack, while Baltimore’s biggest offensive contributions did not produce the same overall scoring volume.
Player Production at a Glance
The most useful way to read the individual numbers is to look at the players who contributed across multiple categories.
Baltimore:
- Lamar Jackson: 147 passing yards, 1 passing TD, 1 INT, 48 rushing yards
- Justice Hill: 76 rushing yards, 41 receiving yards, 2 total TDs
- Zay Flowers: 74 receiving yards
- Derrick Henry: 42 rushing yards
- Mark Andrews: 30 receiving yards
- Kyle Hamilton: 8 total tackles
Kansas City:
- Patrick Mahomes: 270 passing yards, 4 passing TDs, 0 INTs
- Xavier Worthy: 38 rushing yards, 83 receiving yards
- Travis Kelce: 48 receiving yards
- Hollywood Brown: 38 receiving yards, 1 TD
- JuJu Smith-Schuster: 36 receiving yards, 1 TD
- Drue Tranquill: 7 total tackles
- Leo Chenal: 1 interception
This list should not be treated as a ranking. It simply highlights the major statistical contributors recorded in the supplied box score.
What the Box Score Reveals About Offensive Strategy
The Ravens’ statistical profile suggests a strong emphasis on explosive rushing opportunities.
The team averaged 9.8 yards per rushing attempt. That is a remarkable figure, especially with only 17 attempts.
However, the passing game produced fewer touchdowns.
Baltimore had 30 listed targets spread among its receivers, with Flowers and Andrews each receiving eight.
Kansas City’s offensive distribution produced a different result.
The Chiefs threw 37 passes and completed 25. They spread production across Worthy, Kelce, Brown, Smith-Schuster, Pacheco, Smith, and others.
Four different Kansas City receivers recorded touchdown catches in the supplied data.
That distribution made the passing attack productive across several areas of the field.
What the Box Score Reveals About Defensive Pressure
The defensive numbers also deserve attention.
Baltimore’s defense recorded 73 tackles, which was considerably more than Kansas City’s 53.
But tackle volume does not automatically mean greater defensive effectiveness.
Kansas City recorded:
- 3 sacks
- 8 quarterback hits
- 3 tackles for loss
- 4 passes defended
Baltimore recorded:
- 1 sack
- 3 quarterback hits
- 2 tackles for loss
- 2 passes defended
The quarterback-hit difference is especially notable.
Kansas City generated five more quarterback hits than Baltimore.
That pressure helped distinguish the defensive statistical profiles even though Baltimore recorded more total tackles.
For readers analyzing a box score, this is a useful reminder that one statistic rarely tells the entire defensive story.
Understanding the Most Important Numbers
For someone researching this game, several figures deserve particular attention.
Four Passing Touchdowns
Mahomes’ four touchdown passes were the clearest scoring advantage.
Baltimore recorded one passing touchdown.
166 Rushing Yards
The Ravens were highly productive on the ground.
Justice Hill’s 71-yard run had a major effect on that total.
270 Passing Yards
Kansas City’s passing production was the highest major yardage total among the two teams’ passing attacks.
8 Quarterback Hits
Kansas City’s eight quarterback hits were more than double Baltimore’s three.
1 Interception
Leo Chenal recorded Kansas City’s lone interception.
1 Lost Fumble
Lamar Jackson was listed with one fumble, and it was lost.
These figures together provide a more complete picture than the final score alone.
How to Read These Player Stats Correctly
When evaluating a football box score, it is useful to separate volume, efficiency, and scoring.
Volume tells you how frequently a player was involved.
Targets, carries, receptions, and pass attempts belong in this category.
Efficiency shows what happened with those opportunities.
Yards per carry, yards per reception, and yards per pass attempt are useful measures.
Scoring impact tells you whether production became points.
Touchdowns and field goals are particularly important here.
For example, Justice Hill’s three carries produced 76 yards. That is extraordinary efficiency, but his workload was small.
Kareem Hunt’s 13 carries produced 34 yards. His volume was much higher, but his average was lower.
Both statistics can be true at the same time.
This is why player analysis should consider workload alongside efficiency rather than relying on a single number.
Source and Data Notes
The statistics in this article are based on the supplied ESPN NFL box score data for Game ID 401772741, dated September 29, 2025.
For readers who want to cross-check the official game record, the relevant information can be reviewed through ESPN NFL scores and box scores.
The article keeps the supplied figures as the primary statistical reference. Where team totals and individual figures differ slightly in the supplied data, the figures are presented as provided rather than attempting to reconstruct or alter the original box score.
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the final score between the Ravens and Chiefs?
The Kansas City Chiefs defeated the Baltimore Ravens 37-20 on September 29, 2025.
How many passing yards did Patrick Mahomes have?
Patrick Mahomes completed 25 of 37 passes for 270 yards, with four touchdowns and no interceptions in the supplied player statistics.
How many rushing yards did the Ravens have?
Baltimore recorded 166 rushing yards on 17 attempts, averaging 9.8 yards per carry.
Who led Baltimore in receiving?
Zay Flowers led Baltimore with seven receptions for 74 yards on eight targets.
Who led Kansas City in receiving?
Xavier Worthy led Kansas City with five receptions for 83 yards on eight targets.
Who recorded the interception?
Kansas City’s Leo Chenal recorded one interception. Baltimore did not record an interception.
Conclusion
The Baltimore Ravens vs Kansas City Chiefs match player stats from September 29, 2025, provide a detailed example of how different statistical strengths can coexist in one NFL game.
Baltimore’s rushing production was particularly strong. The Ravens gained 166 rushing yards and averaged 9.8 yards per carry. Justice Hill was the biggest explosive contributor, gaining 76 yards on only three carries and adding receiving production.
Kansas City created its biggest advantage through the passing game. The Chiefs recorded 264 team passing yards in the supplied data, while Patrick Mahomes was credited with 270 passing yards, four touchdowns, and no interceptions.
The receiving numbers also favored Kansas City. The Chiefs produced 270 receiving yards and four touchdowns, compared with Baltimore’s 199 receiving yards and one touchdown.
Defensively, Kansas City recorded three sacks and eight quarterback hits. Baltimore recorded one sack and three quarterback hits. The Chiefs also recorded an interception through Leo Chenal.
The final 37-20 score therefore reflects several connected statistical differences rather than one category alone. Baltimore generated explosive rushing numbers, while Kansas City paired efficient passing production with stronger touchdown output, defensive pressure, and turnover creation.
