Golden State Warriors vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats
The golden state warriors vs utah jazz match player stats from January 4, 2026, tell a much more interesting story than the 123-114 final score suggests. Golden State won at Chase Center, but Utah controlled long stretches of the game and actually led after three quarters before the Warriors produced a decisive fourth-quarter response. Stephen Curry finished with 31 points, including six three-pointers, while Lauri Markkanen led all scorers with 35 points for Utah. The Warriors ultimately separated themselves through superior three-point shooting, rebounding, free-throw efficiency, and a huge third-quarter performance from Curry.
This article breaks down the complete player statistics, team numbers, scoring patterns, efficiency, bench production, and the individual performances that shaped the result. Rather than simply repeating the box score, the goal is to explain what the numbers actually mean and why Golden State was able to overcome Utah’s strong offensive start.
Golden State Warriors vs Utah Jazz Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The Warriors defeated the Jazz 123-114 at Chase Center in San Francisco. Golden State entered the game with a 19-17 overall record and an 11-5 home record, while Utah came in at 12-22 overall and 4-11 on the road.
The game was competitive for three quarters. Utah scored 29 points in the opening period and followed that with 36 points in the second. Golden State responded with 33 points in the second quarter, but the Jazz still held a narrow advantage at halftime.
The third quarter became the turning point.
Golden State exploded for 42 points while Utah scored 31. That 11-point swing changed the direction of the game. The Warriors then held Utah to only 18 points in the fourth quarter while scoring 23 themselves.
The final quarter was not an offensive explosion from Golden State. Instead, it was a controlled closing period after the Warriors had already created separation.
Final Score
| Team | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final |
| Utah Jazz | 29 | 36 | 31 | 18 | 114 |
| Golden State Warriors | 25 | 33 | 42 | 23 | 123 |
The Warriors won by nine points.
The most important scoring difference came in the third quarter, where Golden State turned a seven-point halftime deficit into a four-point lead entering the fourth.
The Story Behind the Score
A basic box score tells us Golden State scored 123 and Utah scored 114. A deeper look shows that the game was decided by several smaller advantages working together.
Golden State shot 49% from the field compared with Utah’s 52%, so field-goal percentage alone does not explain the result.
Utah also scored 62 points in the paint compared with Golden State’s 46. That means the Jazz were effective attacking inside.
The difference came elsewhere.
Golden State made 19 three-pointers on 45 attempts, shooting 42% from beyond the arc. Utah made 13 threes on 35 attempts, shooting 37%.
That gave the Warriors 18 more points from three-point range.
Golden State also shot 75% from the free-throw line compared with Utah’s 65%.
The Warriors grabbed 45 rebounds compared with 37 for Utah. That eight-rebound advantage gave Golden State additional possessions and helped offset Utah’s strong interior scoring.
Golden State also committed 14 turnovers compared with Utah’s 15, although the Warriors still allowed Utah to score 22 points from turnovers. This was one of the less efficient parts of Golden State’s performance and remains an important lesson when evaluating the game beyond the final score.
Stephen Curry’s 31-Point Performance
Stephen Curry was the most important player for Golden State.
He finished with:
| Statistic | Stephen Curry |
| Points | 31 |
| Field Goals | 8-18 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 44.4% |
| Three-Pointers | 6-12 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 50% |
| Free Throws | 9-9 |
| Rebounds | 2 |
| Assists | 5 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Turnovers | 2 |
| Plus/Minus | +5 |
The raw 31 points are impressive, but his third-quarter production is the most important part of the performance.
Curry scored 20 points in the third quarter. According to the game recap, he made six of seven shots during that period and hit a go-ahead three-pointer with 7:01 remaining in the quarter before hitting another three on the following possession.
That stretch explains why the Warriors were able to move from trailing Utah to controlling the game.
Curry’s six made three-pointers also gave Golden State a major spacing advantage. Utah had to defend him far beyond the traditional three-point line, creating additional room for Golden State’s other players.
His nine-for-nine free-throw shooting was another efficient element of the performance.
Curry did not need to dominate every statistical category. His value came from high-impact scoring at the exact point when Golden State needed to change the game’s momentum.
Lauri Markkanen Leads Utah With 35 Points
Lauri Markkanen was Utah’s leading scorer and the highest-scoring player in the game.
His final line was:
| Statistic | Lauri Markkanen |
| Points | 35 |
| Field Goals | 15-27 |
| Field Goal Percentage | 55.6% |
| Three-Pointers | 2-8 |
| Three-Point Percentage | 25% |
| Free Throws | 3-4 |
| Rebounds | 6 |
| Assists | 1 |
| Turnovers | 1 |
| Plus/Minus | -2 |
Markkanen was particularly effective early.
He scored 21 points in the first half and shot 9-for-12 during that stretch. That early efficiency helped Utah establish its advantage before Golden State adjusted.
His final 15-for-27 shooting performance shows that Golden State did not completely shut him down.
However, Markkanen’s three-point shooting was less efficient than his overall field-goal shooting. He made only two of eight attempts from outside.
That distinction matters because Utah needed more perimeter efficiency to match Golden State’s three-point volume.
Keyonte George’s 22 Points and 9 Assists
Keyonte George provided Utah with an important combination of scoring and playmaking.
He recorded:
| Statistic | Keyonte George |
| Points | 22 |
| Field Goals | 7-18 |
| Three-Pointers | 4-9 |
| Free Throws | 4-5 |
| Rebounds | 2 |
| Assists | 9 |
| Steals | 1 |
| Turnovers | 7 |
| Plus/Minus | -5 |
The nine assists were valuable because George was responsible for creating opportunities for Utah’s other scorers.
His four made three-pointers also helped Utah stay competitive from the perimeter.
The major weakness was turnovers. Seven turnovers from one primary ball handler is significant, especially against a team capable of converting mistakes into transition opportunities.
George’s performance therefore had two sides. He created offense and scored efficiently enough to remain a major threat, but his turnovers reduced some of that value.
Jimmy Butler III’s All-Around Contribution
Jimmy Butler III scored 15 points for Golden State and added seven assists.
His statistical line included:
- 15 points
- 4-for-9 shooting
- 1-for-2 from three-point range
- 6-for-8 free throws
- 3 rebounds
- 7 assists
- 3 steals
- 2 turnovers
- +9 plus/minus
Butler’s scoring was not the headline of the night, but his seven assists and three steals added value in other areas.
This is a good example of why looking only at points can give an incomplete picture of player impact.
Golden State already had Curry handling a large portion of the scoring burden. Butler could therefore contribute through passing, defensive activity, and free-throw generation.
His +9 also indicates that Golden State outscored Utah by nine points during his time on the floor.
Quinten Post Provides Efficient Scoring
Quinten Post had one of the most efficient offensive performances among Golden State’s supporting players.
He finished with:
- 15 points
- 6-for-9 field goals
- 3-for-6 three-pointers
- 5 rebounds
- 2 assists
- +14 plus/minus
His 66.7% field-goal shooting was excellent.
More importantly, he converted three of six attempts from three-point range. That gave Golden State another frontcourt player capable of stretching the floor.
Post’s +14 was also one of the strongest plus/minus figures among Warriors players who played meaningful minutes.
His performance demonstrates the importance of secondary scoring. Curry was the star, but Golden State did not need Curry to generate every point.
Draymond Green’s Short but Important Appearance
Draymond Green played only 12 minutes and scored eight points.
His statistical line was:
- 8 points
- 3-for-4 shooting
- 1-for-2 from three
- 3 rebounds
- 2 assists
- 1 block
- 1 turnover
- -15 plus/minus
The unusual aspect of his line was his limited playing time.
Green was ejected after receiving consecutive technical fouls in the second quarter. The incident occurred after he argued with officials over what he believed should have been a three-second violation.
Because Green left early, his plus/minus must be interpreted carefully.
A -15 does not mean he individually caused a 15-point loss. Plus/minus measures the team’s point differential while a player is on the court. His limited minutes and the timing of his exit make the figure less useful than it might be in a normal full-game appearance.
Brandin Podziemski’s Playmaking Impact
Brandin Podziemski scored only six points, but his passing was highly valuable.
He finished with:
- 6 points
- 6 rebounds
- 8 assists
- 0 turnovers
- +6 plus/minus
Eight assists without a turnover is particularly noteworthy.
This is one of the strongest examples in the game of why a player’s contribution cannot be judged by scoring alone.
Podziemski helped keep Golden State’s offense moving without adding another major scoring burden. His six rebounds also contributed to the Warriors’ overall advantage on the glass.
Gary Payton II’s Defensive and Rebounding Value
Gary Payton II added 10 points and eight rebounds in 21 minutes.
His final line also included two assists and one steal.
The eight rebounds were particularly useful from a guard or wing perspective.
Golden State finished with 45 total rebounds, eight more than Utah. Contributions from players such as Payton helped create that advantage.
His 10 points also gave the Warriors efficient secondary scoring without requiring a large number of shots.
Trayce Jackson-Davis Adds Interior Energy
Trayce Jackson-Davis scored nine points and collected six rebounds.
He shot 4-for-5 from the field and also grabbed four offensive rebounds.
Those offensive rebounds are important because they represent extra possessions.
Golden State finished with 13 offensive rebounds compared with 10 for Utah. Jackson-Davis was a meaningful part of that effort.
His performance was not spectacular in terms of raw scoring, but his efficiency and work on the offensive glass helped strengthen the Warriors’ overall possession battle.
Utah’s Supporting Cast
Utah’s supporting players helped keep the game close.
Kevin Love
Kevin Love finished with five points, 10 rebounds, and five assists.
His scoring was limited, but his rebounding and passing were valuable.
A 10-rebound, five-assist line from a veteran frontcourt player demonstrates that Utah received meaningful contributions beyond its leading scorers.
Brice Sensabaugh
Brice Sensabaugh scored 12 points while shooting 5-for-8 from the field.
He also made two of four three-point attempts and added two assists and two steals.
His 12 points were efficient, and his two steals contributed to Utah’s defensive activity.
Svi Mykhailiuk
Svi Mykhailiuk scored 10 points on 4-for-6 shooting.
He made two of four three-point attempts and added three rebounds and two assists.
His 66.7% shooting was one of Utah’s most efficient individual performances.
Isaiah Collier
Isaiah Collier led Utah’s bench with eight points, five rebounds, and seven assists.
He also recorded three steals.
His seven assists were especially important because Utah needed secondary creation behind George.
However, Collier finished with a -14 plus/minus, showing that Utah’s overall team performance during his minutes was negative despite his individual playmaking contribution.
Team Shooting Comparison
The shooting numbers reveal one of the clearest reasons Golden State won.
| Category | Utah Jazz | Golden State Warriors |
| Field Goals | 45-86 | 43-87 |
| FG% | 52% | 49% |
| Three-Pointers | 13-35 | 19-45 |
| 3PT% | 37% | 42% |
| Free Throws | 11-17 | 18-24 |
| FT% | 65% | 75% |
Utah made two more field goals than Golden State.
That fact alone might make the result surprising.
The Warriors overcame that disadvantage through three-point volume and efficiency.
Golden State attempted 45 threes compared with Utah’s 35. The Warriors made six more three-pointers.
Six additional three-point makes are worth 18 points.
That difference was larger than the final nine-point margin.
In simple terms, Utah was more efficient on two-point field goals, but Golden State generated more high-value perimeter scoring.
Rebounding Was Another Major Difference
Golden State collected 45 rebounds compared with Utah’s 37.
That is an eight-rebound advantage.
The Warriors also had 13 offensive rebounds compared with Utah’s 10.
Offensive rebounding does more than add to the rebound column. It creates opportunities for a team to extend possessions after missed shots.
This was particularly useful because Golden State shot 49% overall, meaning the Warriors had a significant number of missed field-goal attempts.
Recovering some of those misses helped create additional possessions.
Assists Were Even
Both teams recorded 32 assists.
That makes the game more interesting because Golden State did not win through a huge passing advantage.
Instead, the Warriors matched Utah’s assist total while gaining advantages in other categories.
Golden State’s 32 assists came alongside 14 turnovers.
Utah’s 32 assists came alongside 15 turnovers.
The difference is small, but Golden State did slightly better at protecting the ball.
Turnovers and the Possession Battle
Turnovers were not a strength for either team.
Utah committed 15.
Golden State committed 14.
However, the Warriors still allowed Utah to score 22 points off turnovers.
That was one of the areas Golden State would have wanted to improve.
The positive side was that the Warriors created nine steals compared with seven for Utah.
That two-steal difference helped compensate somewhat for the turnovers.
The broader lesson is that Golden State won despite giving Utah opportunities from mistakes.
That matters because a cleaner offensive performance could have produced an even larger margin.
The Third Quarter Changed Everything
If someone wants to understand this game quickly, the third quarter is the best place to start.
At halftime, Utah had scored 65 points and Golden State had scored 58.
The Jazz were ahead by seven.
Then Golden State scored 42 points in the third quarter.
Utah scored 31.
The Warriors therefore gained 11 points in one period.
Curry was the central figure.
His 20-point third quarter transformed the game.
This was not simply a case of Golden State slowly improving. The Warriors produced a concentrated offensive burst that changed the scoreboard and forced Utah to play from behind.
That is why Curry’s 31-point final total does not fully capture the importance of his performance.
Timing matters.
Why Utah Could Not Protect Its Lead
Utah’s early success came from excellent shooting and strong interior scoring.
Markkanen was highly efficient.
The Jazz also scored 62 points in the paint.
However, Utah’s offense became less effective late in the game.
The fourth-quarter numbers are especially revealing.
Utah scored only 18 points.
Golden State scored 23.
The Jazz’s offensive efficiency dropped at the same time Golden State was protecting its lead.
Another issue was three-point efficiency.
Utah shot 37% from three overall, which is respectable, but Markkanen shot only 25% from deep and the team made 13 threes.
Golden State made 19.
When a team is trying to overcome a late deficit against a team with Curry, the margin for missed perimeter opportunities becomes much smaller.
Why Golden State Won Despite Shooting a Lower Field-Goal Percentage
This is one of the most useful lessons from the box score.
Golden State shot 49% from the field.
Utah shot 52%.
Yet Golden State won.
That happened because field-goal percentage does not account for the additional value of three-point shots.
Golden State made 19 threes.
Utah made 13.
The Warriors also made 18 free throws compared with Utah’s 11.
The combination of three-point production and free-throw efficiency compensated for Utah’s better overall field-goal percentage.
This is why advanced game analysis should not rely on one shooting statistic.
A team can shoot worse overall and still produce more points per possession if it generates more efficient scoring opportunities.
Plus/Minus: Who Had the Biggest Positive Impact?
Golden State’s strongest plus/minus figures included:
- Moses Moody: +16
- Quinten Post: +14
- Trayce Jackson-Davis: +10
- Jimmy Butler III: +9
- Brandin Podziemski: +6
- Stephen Curry: +5
Moody’s +16 was particularly notable.
He scored eight points, grabbed two rebounds, and recorded two assists, but his biggest contribution was his overall impact while on the court.
Quinten Post’s +14 was another major positive.
For Utah, the team had few strong plus/minus results.
Brice Sensabaugh finished +1.
Most of Utah’s main contributors were negative or near neutral.
However, plus/minus should always be used alongside other statistics. It measures the team’s net scoring margin while the player is on the floor and does not isolate individual performance.
Full Golden State Warriors Player Production
The main Warriors numbers were:
| Player | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | +/- |
| Stephen Curry | 31 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 0 | +5 |
| Jimmy Butler III | 15 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 0 | +9 |
| Quinten Post | 15 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 | +14 |
| Gary Payton II | 10 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| Trayce Jackson-Davis | 9 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | +10 |
| Draymond Green | 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | -15 |
| Moses Moody | 8 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +16 |
| Brandin Podziemski | 6 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 0 | +6 |
| Gui Santos | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | +4 |
The table highlights how balanced Golden State’s supporting production was.
Curry led the scoring, but six other Warriors reached at least eight points.
That balance reduced the pressure on Curry to create every possession.
Full Utah Jazz Player Production
Utah’s main statistical contributors were:
| Player | PTS | REB | AST | STL | BLK | +/- |
| Lauri Markkanen | 35 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | -2 |
| Keyonte George | 22 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 0 | -5 |
| Brice Sensabaugh | 12 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | +1 |
| Svi Mykhailiuk | 10 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -6 |
| Isaiah Collier | 8 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 1 | -14 |
| Kyle Filipowski | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -4 |
| Walter Clayton Jr. | 8 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | -6 |
| Kevin Love | 5 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 | -4 |
Markkanen and George accounted for 57 of Utah’s 114 points.
That means exactly half of Utah’s scoring came from its two leading scorers.
Golden State had more distributed scoring around Curry.
Golden State’s Three-Point Strategy
The Warriors attempted 45 three-pointers.
That was 10 more attempts than Utah.
This was not just about Curry.
Curry made six.
Post made three.
Moody made two.
Several other Warriors also converted from deep.
The result was a team total of 19 made threes.
Golden State’s 42% three-point shooting was strong enough to turn high-volume perimeter offense into a major scoring advantage.
The important strategic point is that the Warriors did not simply depend on difficult Curry shots.
They generated multiple perimeter threats.
That makes defending Golden State much harder because sending extra defenders toward Curry can create open opportunities elsewhere.
Utah’s Interior Advantage Was Not Enough
Utah scored 62 points in the paint.
Golden State scored 46.
That 16-point advantage shows that Utah was successful attacking inside.
Yet it was not enough to overcome Golden State’s perimeter production.
This creates an interesting contrast.
Utah’s offense was effective in a traditional sense because it could generate high-percentage interior opportunities.
Golden State’s offense was more dependent on perimeter value.
The Warriors’ approach produced fewer total field goals but more three-point makes.
This is a clear example of how different offensive styles can produce a close game even when the final efficiency profile looks very different.
The Role of Free Throws
Free throws also favored Golden State.
The Warriors made 18 of 24.
Utah made 11 of 17.
Golden State therefore scored seven more points at the free-throw line.
Curry was perfect at 9-for-9.
Butler also made six of eight.
Those two players combined for 15 of Golden State’s 18 made free throws.
That is an important detail because free-throw efficiency gave the Warriors another reliable source of scoring when Utah was trying to recover.
What the Player Stats Say About Both Teams
The numbers suggest two different team identities in this particular matchup.
Utah demonstrated strong half-court scoring through Markkanen, interior production, and effective field-goal shooting.
Golden State demonstrated greater perimeter volume, better three-point efficiency, stronger rebounding, and more balanced scoring.
Neither team completely dominated the other.
The Warriors simply accumulated enough advantages in high-value categories to win.
What Stands Out Most From the Match
Several numbers deserve special attention.
1. Curry’s 20-Point Third Quarter
This was the biggest individual swing of the game.
2. Golden State’s 19 Three-Pointers
The Warriors made six more threes than Utah.
3. Utah’s 62 Paint Points
The Jazz were highly effective inside.
4. Golden State’s 45 Rebounds
The eight-rebound advantage helped create additional possessions.
5. Markkanen’s 35 Points
He was Utah’s offensive leader and the game’s highest scorer.
6. Butler’s 15 Points and 7 Assists
His production went beyond scoring.
7. Podziemski’s 8 Assists With 0 Turnovers
His playmaking was one of Golden State’s most efficient supporting contributions.
8. Green’s Early Ejection
His limited playing time changed Golden State’s rotation and forced other players to absorb additional minutes.
Season Series Context
The Warriors led the season series 2-0 based on the supplied game data.
The earlier meeting was a 134-117 Golden State victory on November 25, 2025.
The January matchup was therefore another win for Golden State, although the game itself was much more competitive.
The Warriors’ two victories show that Golden State had repeatedly found ways to generate enough offense against Utah.
The later listed meeting in the supplied data was scheduled for January 29, 2026.
For readers studying the season series, comparing the two games is more useful than looking at one box score in isolation. It can reveal whether a team’s approach changed or whether the same matchup advantages continued to appear.
What Readers Should Look For in These Stats
If you are using game statistics for fantasy analysis, basketball research, sports writing, or simply trying to understand the game, there are several useful habits.
First, look beyond points.
A player scoring 15 points with seven assists and three steals can be more influential than another player scoring 20 points on poor efficiency.
Second, compare shooting volume with shooting percentage.
Curry’s six made threes were important, but Golden State’s 45 attempts also mattered.
Third, examine possessions.
Rebounds and turnovers help explain how many opportunities each team created.
Fourth, study timing.
Curry’s 20-point third quarter was much more consequential than if the same 20 points had been spread evenly across a comfortable game.
Finally, use plus/minus carefully.
It can provide useful context, but it should never be treated as a complete measure of individual performance.
A Practical Way to Analyze Any NBA Box Score
The same approach used for this matchup can be applied to almost any basketball game.
Start with the final score.
Then compare quarter-by-quarter scoring.
Next, examine field-goal percentage, three-point shooting, and free throws.
After that, compare rebounds and turnovers.
Then identify the top individual scorers.
Finally, examine assists, steals, blocks, and plus/minus to understand contributions that do not appear in the scoring column.
This method provides a much more complete picture than simply asking who scored the most points.
For this matchup, that process immediately reveals why Markkanen’s 35 points did not produce a Utah victory.
His scoring was excellent, but Golden State’s collective three-point production and Curry’s third-quarter explosion changed the game.
Final Assessment of the Match
The golden state warriors vs utah jazz match player stats show a game in which both teams had clear strengths.
Utah shot better overall and dominated points in the paint.
Markkanen was outstanding, George combined scoring with nine assists, and the Jazz received useful contributions from Love, Sensabaugh, Mykhailiuk, and Collier.
Golden State, however, had the more valuable combination of perimeter shooting, rebounding, free-throw efficiency, and balanced secondary scoring.
Curry was the decisive individual factor.
His 31 points were impressive, but the 20-point third quarter was the defining sequence. He turned a seven-point halftime deficit into a Golden State advantage.
The supporting cast then helped protect that advantage.
Post shot efficiently.
Butler created opportunities and generated steals.
Podziemski provided eight assists without a turnover.
Payton contributed eight rebounds.
Jackson-Davis added offensive rebounding and efficient scoring.
Moody posted the team’s best plus/minus.
Together, those contributions explain why Golden State could win even though Utah had a higher overall field-goal percentage.
The final 123-114 score therefore represents more than a nine-point victory. It reflects a matchup between Utah’s interior and mid-range scoring strength and Golden State’s perimeter-oriented offensive pressure.
For anyone researching golden state warriors vs utah jazz match player stats, the most important takeaway is that the box score should be read as a connected system. Curry’s shooting, Golden State’s three-point volume, the rebounding advantage, Utah’s paint scoring, and the late-game defensive improvement all interacted to produce the final result.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who scored the most points in the Warriors vs Jazz game?
Lauri Markkanen was the game’s leading scorer with 35 points for Utah. Stephen Curry led Golden State with 31 points.
How many points did Stephen Curry score against the Utah Jazz?
Stephen Curry scored 31 points. He made eight of 18 field-goal attempts, six of 12 three-point attempts, and all nine of his free throws.
How many points did Lauri Markkanen score against Golden State?
Lauri Markkanen scored 35 points on 15-for-27 shooting. He also recorded six rebounds and two made three-pointers.
Which team won the game?
The Golden State Warriors defeated the Utah Jazz 123-114 at Chase Center.
How many three-pointers did Golden State make?
Golden State made 19 three-pointers on 45 attempts, shooting 42% from beyond the arc. Utah made 13 three-pointers on 35 attempts.
Who had the most assists for Golden State?
Brandin Podziemski recorded eight assists, the most for Golden State. Jimmy Butler III had seven assists, while Stephen Curry had five.
Conclusion
The golden state warriors vs utah jazz match player stats provide a strong example of why a basketball game cannot be explained by the final score or leading scorer alone.
Utah had the better overall field-goal percentage and scored 62 points in the paint. Markkanen produced 35 points, while George added 22 points and nine assists. The Jazz showed that they could create efficient offense and compete with Golden State for extended periods.
Golden State’s response was built around three-point shooting, rebounding, free throws, and timely playmaking.
Curry’s 31 points were the headline performance, but his 20-point third quarter was the moment that changed the contest. The Warriors’ supporting players then supplied enough scoring, rebounding, passing, and defensive activity to maintain the advantage.
The final numbers show a team victory rather than a one-player victory. Golden State made 19 threes, collected 45 rebounds, recorded 32 assists, and converted 18 free throws. Those advantages were enough to overcome Utah’s superior field-goal percentage and interior scoring.
For readers studying player statistics, this matchup is a useful reminder to evaluate efficiency, volume, possessions, timing, and role together. That approach gives a much clearer understanding of what actually happened on the court.
