Cleveland Cavaliers vs LA Clippers Match Player Stats
Cleveland Cavaliers vs LA Clippers match player stats from February 5, 2026, tell the story of a one-sided 124-91 Cleveland victory at Intuit Dome. The Cavaliers controlled the game from the opening quarter, built a 20-point halftime lead, and continued to increase the margin after the break. Donovan Mitchell led Cleveland with 29 points and 9 assists, while Jaylon Tyson added 17 points on highly efficient shooting. For Los Angeles, Kawhi Leonard finished with 25 points, 7 rebounds, and 4 assists, while John Collins contributed 19 points and 7 rebounds.
The final 33-point margin was not simply the result of one hot shooting night. Cleveland combined efficient field-goal shooting, strong ball security, aggressive defense, rebounding, and balanced offensive production. The Cavaliers finished with 50 made field goals on 98 attempts, 16 three-pointers on 41 attempts, 44 rebounds, 30 assists, 17 steals, and only 9 turnovers.
Los Angeles had respectable overall field-goal efficiency at 46 percent, but the Clippers struggled badly from three-point range. They made only 6 of 28 attempts from beyond the arc, while Cleveland converted 16 of 41. The Clippers also committed 24 turnovers, creating another major advantage for Cleveland.
Cleveland Cavaliers vs LA Clippers Match Player Stats: Game Overview
The February 5 meeting took place at Intuit Dome in Inglewood, California, with an announced attendance of 17,927. Cleveland entered the contest with a 31-21 record and a 14-10 road record. Los Angeles entered at 23-27 and had a 13-11 home record.
The Cavaliers won all four quarters:
| Quarter | Cleveland | LA Clippers |
| 1st | 36 | 18 |
| 2nd | 26 | 24 |
| 3rd | 32 | 26 |
| 4th | 30 | 23 |
| Final | 124 | 91 |
The opening quarter was particularly important. Cleveland scored 36 points while limiting Los Angeles to only 18. That 18-point advantage established the tone for the rest of the game.
Rather than allowing the Clippers to recover in the second quarter, Cleveland added another two points to its lead. The Cavaliers went into halftime ahead 62-42.
The third quarter produced another strong Cleveland offensive performance. The Cavaliers scored 32 points compared with 26 from Los Angeles, pushing the advantage to 26 points entering the final period.
Cleveland then scored 30 points in the fourth quarter. Los Angeles managed 23, leaving the Cavaliers with a 124-91 victory.
Donovan Mitchell Drives Cleveland’s Offense
Donovan Mitchell was the central offensive figure in this matchup. He finished with 29 points, making him the game’s leading scorer.
His shooting line was:
| Statistic | Donovan Mitchell |
| Points | 29 |
| Field Goals | 10-19 |
| Three-Pointers | 3-9 |
| Free Throws | 6-6 |
| Rebounds | 5 |
| Assists | 9 |
| Steals | 4 |
Mitchell’s value went beyond scoring. His 9 assists were the most on either team, giving Cleveland an important secondary source of offensive creation.
His 10-for-19 shooting also meant that he did not need an unusually high number of attempts to reach 29 points. He converted all six of his free throws and added three three-pointers.
The four steals were another major part of his contribution. Cleveland finished with 17 steals as a team, and Mitchell accounted for four of them.
This combination of scoring, playmaking, and defensive activity made Mitchell one of the defining players of the contest.
Jaylon Tyson Provides Efficient Secondary Scoring
Jaylon Tyson was Cleveland’s second-leading scorer with 17 points.
His offensive numbers were particularly efficient:
| Statistic | Jaylon Tyson |
| Points | 17 |
| Field Goals | 7-10 |
| Three-Pointers | 3-3 |
Tyson converted seven of his ten field-goal attempts and made all three of his three-point attempts.
That efficiency mattered because Cleveland did not need Mitchell to carry the entire scoring load. Tyson’s production gave the Cavaliers another reliable offensive option and helped maintain pressure on the Clippers.
A 7-for-10 shooting performance combined with perfect three-point shooting also demonstrates how Cleveland’s offense benefited from multiple players converting their opportunities.
Jarrett Allen Controls the Glass
Jarrett Allen led Cleveland in rebounding with 11 boards.
While Mitchell supplied the scoring and playmaking, Allen’s rebounding helped Cleveland finish the game with a 44-37 advantage on the glass.
Rebounding can become particularly important in games where one team is shooting significantly better from outside. Cleveland not only created scoring opportunities through its own offense, but also limited the Clippers’ ability to gain additional possessions through offensive rebounds.
Allen’s 11 rebounds therefore contributed to a broader team advantage rather than existing as an isolated individual statistic.
Cleveland’s Starting Lineup
Cleveland started:
- Dean Wade
- Jarrett Allen
- Donovan Mitchell
- Sam Merrill
- Jaylon Tyson
The starting group combined frontcourt size with perimeter shooting and Mitchell’s primary creation responsibilities.
Mitchell was the leading scorer and assist leader, Allen supplied interior rebounding, and Tyson provided highly efficient scoring. Together, the starters established the foundation for Cleveland’s 124-point performance.
Cleveland’s Bench Production
The Cavaliers also received useful contributions from their second unit.
| Cavaliers Bench Player | Points |
| Dennis Schroder | 11 |
| Larry Nance Jr. | 8 |
| Thomas Bryant | 8 |
| Craig Porter Jr. | 7 |
| Keon Ellis | 6 |
| Tyrese Proctor | 6 |
| Nae’Qwan Tomlin | 4 |
| Tristan Enaruna | 2 |
Dennis Schroder was Cleveland’s highest-scoring bench player with 11 points.
Larry Nance Jr. and Thomas Bryant each added 8, while Craig Porter Jr. scored 7. Keon Ellis and Tyrese Proctor each contributed 6.
The distribution is significant because Cleveland’s offense did not depend exclusively on its starting five. The bench supplied additional scoring while the Cavaliers maintained their large lead.
Kawhi Leonard Leads the Clippers
Kawhi Leonard was Los Angeles’ leading scorer, finishing with 25 points.
His complete line from the game was:
| Statistic | Kawhi Leonard |
| Points | 25 |
| Field Goals | 10-20 |
| Three-Pointers | 2-6 |
| Free Throws | 3-3 |
| Rebounds | 7 |
| Assists | 4 |
Leonard shot 10-for-20 from the field and made two three-pointers. He also converted all three free throws.
His 25 points represented a substantial portion of the Clippers’ offensive output. However, Cleveland’s defensive pressure and the Clippers’ turnover problems prevented Leonard’s scoring from translating into a competitive team total.
Leonard also collected 7 rebounds and recorded 4 assists, making him one of Los Angeles’ most productive all-around players on the night.
John Collins Adds 19 Points
John Collins finished second among Clippers scorers with 19 points.
He shot 8-for-11 from the field and added 7 rebounds.
| Statistic | John Collins |
| Points | 19 |
| Field Goals | 8-11 |
| Rebounds | 7 |
Collins’ 8-for-11 shooting was efficient, but his production was not enough to offset Cleveland’s broader statistical advantages.
The Clippers needed more offensive support across the lineup, particularly from three-point range and from players handling the ball.
Clippers Rebounding and Playmaking
Yanic Konan Niederhauser led Los Angeles in rebounding with 8 boards.
Kris Dunn was the Clippers’ assist leader with 6 assists.
The team also received scoring from several reserves:
| Clippers Bench Player | Points |
| Yanic Konan Niederhauser | 10 |
| Kobe Brown | 10 |
| Derrick Jones Jr. | 7 |
| Jordan Miller | 5 |
| Bogdan Bogdanovic | 2 |
| Cam Christie | 2 |
| Nicolas Batum | 0 |
| TyTy Washington Jr. | 0 |
Niederhauser and Kobe Brown each scored 10 points from the bench. Derrick Jones Jr. added 7, while Jordan Miller contributed 5.
The bench scoring distribution shows that Los Angeles had several players contributing, but no reserve approached the scoring level needed to close the large gap created during the first half.
Clippers Starting Lineup
Los Angeles started:
- Kawhi Leonard
- John Collins
- Brook Lopez
- Kris Dunn
- Kobe Sanders
Leonard and Collins were the primary scoring contributors among the starters.
Kris Dunn led the team in assists with 6, while Leonard contributed 4 assists. The lineup had experienced scoring and playmaking options, but Cleveland’s defensive activity created problems throughout the game.
Team Shooting Comparison
Shooting efficiency provides one of the clearest explanations for the final result.
| Team | FG | 3PT | FT |
| Cavaliers | 50-98, 51% | 16-41, 39% | 8-13, 62% |
| Clippers | 37-80, 46% | 6-28, 21% | 11-12, 92% |
Cleveland made 50 field goals compared with 37 for Los Angeles.
The Cavaliers also made ten more three-pointers. Cleveland connected on 16 three-point attempts, while Los Angeles made only 6.
That produced a 30-point difference in made three-point baskets alone when measured by the extra points those makes generated: Cleveland’s 16 threes accounted for 48 points, while the Clippers’ 6 accounted for 18.
Los Angeles did shoot free throws more efficiently, converting 11 of 12 attempts for 92 percent. Cleveland made 8 of 13 for 62 percent.
However, the free-throw advantage was nowhere near large enough to compensate for Cleveland’s superior three-point production and overall field-goal output.
Turnovers Become a Major Factor
One of the biggest statistical differences was turnover control.
Cleveland committed only 9 turnovers.
Los Angeles committed 24.
That means the Clippers recorded 15 more turnovers than Cleveland.
For a game decided by 33 points, this is an important statistic. Turnovers can end offensive possessions without a shot attempt and can also create transition opportunities for the opposing team.
Cleveland’s 17 steals further highlight its defensive pressure. The Cavaliers were active in passing lanes and consistently disrupted Los Angeles possessions.
The Clippers had 6 steals, meaning Cleveland generated 11 more steals than Los Angeles.
Rebounding Comparison
Cleveland also held a 44-37 rebounding advantage.
| Rebounding Category | Cavaliers | Clippers |
| Total Rebounds | 44 | 37 |
The seven-rebound difference was not as dramatic as the turnover or three-point gaps, but it still favored Cleveland.
Jarrett Allen’s 11 rebounds led the Cavaliers, while Yanic Konan Niederhauser’s 8 led Los Angeles.
Cleveland’s rebounding advantage also helped support its ability to control the game’s pace and limit second-chance opportunities.
Passing and Ball Movement
Cleveland recorded 30 assists.
Los Angeles recorded 20.
That ten-assist difference provides another useful way to understand the offensive separation.
Mitchell alone produced 9 assists, almost half of Los Angeles’ entire team total.
The Cavaliers’ 30 assists also indicate that their 50 made field goals were frequently supported by team ball movement rather than isolated scoring possessions.
The combination of 30 assists and only 9 turnovers is particularly notable. Cleveland maintained a strong assist-to-turnover profile while continuing to generate high-volume offense.
Los Angeles, in contrast, produced 20 assists while turning the ball over 24 times.
Defensive Activity Defines the Game
The defensive numbers strongly favored Cleveland.
| Defensive Stat | Cavaliers | Clippers |
| Steals | 17 | 6 |
| Blocks | 5 | 4 |
| Turnovers | 9 | 24 |
Cleveland’s 17 steals were the most striking defensive number.
The Cavaliers also recorded 5 blocks compared with 4 for the Clippers. Although the difference in blocks was small, Cleveland’s much higher steal total shows that its defense was particularly effective at disrupting ball handlers and passing lanes.
The result was a difficult environment for Los Angeles to maintain consistent offensive possessions.
Why the First Quarter Mattered So Much
The Cavaliers scored 36 points in the first quarter while holding Los Angeles to 18.
That 18-point opening advantage immediately changed the structure of the game.
A team trailing by that amount has to decide whether to increase offensive pace, take more difficult shots, or rely on defensive adjustments. Los Angeles scored 24 points in the second quarter, but Cleveland scored 26 and therefore extended the halftime lead.
The Clippers never produced a quarter in which they outscored Cleveland.
That is important. The final margin was not created by one isolated late-game run. Cleveland won all four quarters.
The Halftime Difference
At halftime, Cleveland led 62-42.
The 20-point halftime advantage was built from several areas:
- Cleveland started with a 36-18 first quarter.
- Cleveland continued to outscore Los Angeles in the second quarter.
- The Cavaliers were more efficient from three-point range.
- Cleveland committed substantially fewer turnovers.
- Mitchell was already contributing as both scorer and creator.
- Cleveland’s defensive pressure produced steals and disrupted possessions.
A 20-point halftime lead also gave Cleveland room to manage the second half without needing to rely on one player for every possession.
Third Quarter Extends Cleveland’s Control
Cleveland scored 32 points in the third quarter.
Los Angeles scored 26.
The Cavaliers therefore added another six points to their lead and entered the final period ahead by 26.
This quarter was important because the Clippers had an opportunity to reduce the deficit after halftime. Instead, Cleveland continued producing efficient offense.
Mitchell’s creation, Tyson’s shooting, and Cleveland’s overall ball movement kept the offense functioning even as Los Angeles attempted to respond.
Fourth Quarter Closes Out the Result
Cleveland scored 30 points in the fourth quarter, while Los Angeles scored 23.
The Cavaliers therefore finished the game without a significant offensive decline.
The final score of 124-91 produced a 33-point margin.
Because Cleveland remained productive through the fourth quarter, the final result reflected sustained control rather than a narrow victory that became larger only during the closing minutes.
Cleveland’s Statistical Profile
Several numbers stand out when examining the Cavaliers’ complete performance:
- 124 total points
- 50 made field goals
- 51 percent field-goal shooting
- 16 made three-pointers
- 39 percent three-point shooting
- 44 rebounds
- 30 assists
- 17 steals
- 5 blocks
- 9 turnovers
The most impressive combination is the relationship between assists and turnovers.
Cleveland generated 30 assists while committing only 9 turnovers. That represents a significant level of offensive organization.
The team also produced 17 steals, which helped turn defensive activity into additional possession opportunities.
Los Angeles Statistical Profile
The Clippers finished with:
- 91 points
- 37 made field goals
- 46 percent field-goal shooting
- 6 made three-pointers
- 21 percent three-point shooting
- 37 rebounds
- 20 assists
- 6 steals
- 4 blocks
- 24 turnovers
The Clippers were not completely ineffective from the field. Their 46 percent overall field-goal percentage was respectable.
The major problem was the combination of poor three-point shooting and excessive turnovers.
Making only 6 of 28 three-point attempts limited the team’s ability to keep pace with Cleveland’s perimeter production. The 24 turnovers then reduced the number of clean offensive opportunities available to Los Angeles.
Comparing the Leading Players
The leading scorers on each side were Donovan Mitchell and Kawhi Leonard.
| Category | Donovan Mitchell | Kawhi Leonard |
| Points | 29 | 25 |
| FG | 10-19 | 10-20 |
| 3PT | 3-9 | 2-6 |
| FT | 6-6 | 3-3 |
| Rebounds | 5 | 7 |
| Assists | 9 | 4 |
| Steals | 4 | Not listed |
Both players scored efficiently from the field.
Mitchell had four more points and five more assists, while Leonard collected two more rebounds.
Mitchell’s contribution was particularly influential because his scoring was combined with high-level playmaking and defensive activity.
Leonard remained the Clippers’ primary offensive threat, but the supporting statistical environment was less favorable for Los Angeles.
Season Series: Cleveland Goes 2-0
Cleveland completed a 2-0 season series sweep over Los Angeles.
The teams had previously met on November 24, 2025, when Cleveland won 120-105.
The February 5 victory therefore followed another double-digit Cleveland win.
The two meetings produced a combined picture of Cleveland’s ability to generate offense against the Clippers while maintaining a significant scoring margin.
The February meeting was particularly decisive, with Cleveland winning by 33 points.
Previous Meeting Comparison
The November 24 meeting ended:
Cleveland Cavaliers 120, LA Clippers 105
The February 5 meeting ended:
Cleveland Cavaliers 124, LA Clippers 91
| Meeting | Cavaliers | Clippers | Margin |
| November 24, 2025 | 120 | 105 | Cleveland +15 |
| February 5, 2026 | 124 | 91 | Cleveland +33 |
Cleveland scored four more points in the second meeting while the Clippers scored 14 fewer.
As a result, the margin increased from 15 points in November to 33 points in February.
What the Player Stats Reveal
Raw scoring totals are useful, but they do not fully explain a basketball game.
The deeper statistical picture shows several important themes.
Cleveland Created More Efficient Possessions
The Cavaliers shot 51 percent from the field and 39 percent from three-point range.
They also generated 30 assists.
This combination suggests an offense that was consistently producing quality scoring opportunities.
Cleveland Protected the Basketball
Nine turnovers over a full game is a strong team possession statistic.
The Clippers, meanwhile, committed 24 turnovers.
The 15-turnover difference created a major possession advantage for Cleveland.
Cleveland Won the Perimeter Battle
The Cavaliers made 16 three-pointers.
The Clippers made 6.
That 10-made-three difference was one of the clearest statistical gaps in the game.
Cleveland Applied Defensive Pressure
The Cavaliers recorded 17 steals.
That figure was almost three times Los Angeles’ total of 6.
The defensive activity helped Cleveland disrupt Los Angeles’ offensive rhythm and contributed to the turnover gap.
Understanding the Box Score Without Overlooking Context
A box score should be read as a collection of connected statistics rather than a list of isolated numbers.
For example, Mitchell’s 29 points are important, but his 9 assists explain why his overall offensive influence was larger than his scoring total alone.
Similarly, Allen’s 11 rebounds are more meaningful when considered alongside Cleveland’s 44 total rebounds.
The Clippers’ 25 points from Leonard and 19 from Collins show that Los Angeles had productive individual performances. However, those numbers must be considered alongside 24 team turnovers and 21 percent three-point shooting.
This is why team-level statistics are essential when interpreting individual player production.
Game Officials
The game officials listed for the February 5 contest were:
- Kevin Cutler
- Scott Twardoski
- Brandon Adair
The game time was listed as 8:30 AM on February 5, 2026, with the contest taking place at Intuit Dome in Inglewood, California.
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was the top scorer in the Cavaliers vs Clippers game?
Donovan Mitchell was the game’s leading scorer with 29 points for Cleveland. He shot 10-for-19 from the field, made 3 of 9 three-point attempts, and converted all 6 free throws.
How many points did Kawhi Leonard score against Cleveland?
Kawhi Leonard scored 25 points for the Clippers. He made 10 of 20 field-goal attempts, 2 of 6 three-pointers, and all 3 of his free throws.
What was the final score between Cleveland and the Clippers?
The Cleveland Cavaliers defeated the LA Clippers 124-91 on February 5, 2026, at Intuit Dome.
Who led the Cavaliers in assists?
Donovan Mitchell led Cleveland with 9 assists. He also scored 29 points, collected 5 rebounds, and recorded 4 steals.
Who led the Cavaliers in rebounds?
Jarrett Allen led the Cavaliers with 11 rebounds.
How many turnovers did each team commit?
Cleveland committed 9 turnovers, while the Clippers committed 24. The 15-turnover difference was one of the largest statistical advantages in the game.
Conclusion
The February 5, 2026 matchup provides a clear example of how multiple statistical advantages can combine into a decisive NBA result.
Cleveland finished with 124 points while shooting 51 percent from the field and 39 percent from three-point range. The Cavaliers also recorded 30 assists, 44 rebounds, and 17 steals while committing only 9 turnovers.
Donovan Mitchell led the scoring with 29 points and added 9 assists and 4 steals. Jaylon Tyson contributed 17 points on 7-for-10 shooting and perfect three-point shooting. Jarrett Allen controlled the boards with 11 rebounds.
For Los Angeles, Kawhi Leonard led the team with 25 points, 7 rebounds, and 4 assists. John Collins added 19 points on 8-for-11 shooting and collected 7 rebounds.
The most important team differences were Cleveland’s 16 made three-pointers compared with 6 for Los Angeles, 17 steals compared with 6, and 9 turnovers compared with 24.
Cleveland also won every quarter, meaning the 124-91 result was built through sustained control rather than one isolated scoring run.
The season series finished 2-0 in Cleveland’s favor, following the Cavaliers’ 120-105 victory over the Clippers on November 24, 2025.
For anyone studying the Cleveland Cavaliers vs LA Clippers match player stats, the key lesson is that the final score becomes easier to understand when scoring, shooting efficiency, ball security, assists, rebounding, and defensive pressure are examined together.
